my favorite version of sleeping beauty - austrilian ballet company! i grew up watching it since i was six or seven xD that was sooo long ago. but i haven't seen any version danced better than theirs!
yeah i'm on the fence 2... i'm not all that fond of this version but the sharpness of it does have a certain appeal. she looks more like a gladiator tho in that headpiece.
This is my favorite variation of this. She's not quite as good as Sarah Lamb is at it, but she did it to the speed I learned it, so I like it slightly better for that reason.
I'm not sure what to think! It was certainly very fast, but she had good technique and looked quite happy. Same choreography as Sarah Lamb, but this girl seemed to do it very differently somehow. Maybe it's just the speed.
Weird costume though. Not sure if I like the gold under the tutu or tall headpeice.
Odd echappes; she seemed to be very far back on her feet during that part. Maybe it's just the choreoghraphy.
No, its not just the speed. This video is like the young hyper, excited little bluebird, and Sarah Lambs performance is like the older wiser, graceful bluebird. ^^ I love them both!
The costume seems fine to me, not its not as pretty as others I've seen, but it does its job. XD If I were the dancer I would certainly like Sarah Lambs costume better, but then again- each to their own. This costume fits the younger style of dance, while Sarahs fits the wiser bluebird. :)
that's the speed I learned it at, Sarah Lamb does the slower version with a very slightly different choreography. That's my favorite version of the variation. I think the biggest difference was on her fouttes . It seemed like she didn't turn around all the way, like she stopped facing the audience, rather than the opposite side of the stage... and I also agree about her being back on her feet on the eshapes.
she might have been trying to imitate a bird, some people like to interpret it as this variation should be more darty and bird-like. each interpretation is different.
she might have been trying to imitate a bird, some people like to interpret it as this variation should be more darty and bird-like. each interpretation is different.
As one of her students at this present time...I can truelly say that she still is a technition and that of her lovely standard and technique from her time she carries that across in her teaching, which is invalid and worthy of todays much higher standard and expectations. She is not too small!!! And she doesn't have awful feet....as has already been pointed out, this is form over 20 yeats now. Do not be so cocky!!! Just appreciate this eautiful art!!!
I know her personally.If you think you can do better... then where is your footage. She is a beautiful dancer, with passion and energy take into concideration that this footage is from over twenty years ago.. sure put it up against today's standards and you may have a valid point, however it is timeless. everyone has there good and bad points. stop being hyper critical and have something positive to admire in other dancers.
I think she leans forward too much..
aselby478 2 months ago
look who is gracious and it isn´t a pro!!
watch?v=IdGtoXfwjcM
mrsquim1 6 months ago
watch?v=IdGtoXfwjcM
mrsquim1 6 months ago
@Jairdan The name is "Florine", Florestan is the name of the king (Aurora's father).
theamazingsoter 7 months ago
this is actually a pretty hard variation. it takes a lot of effort to make your arms look that graceful. the music is quite fast, though
fyshdanser 9 months ago 2
Where is the grace?! The beauty!?
101dancerdiva 9 months ago
she hops onto pointe too much, and her additudes are no good /:
sherbert981 10 months ago
She's pretty good :) her arms are kinda weird
thefourandonly1 11 months ago
woah shes like a stick eh?
danzemuzik 1 year ago
her arems are much too robotic. its very good though. shes verry precice.
ballerina0215 1 year ago
her arems are much too robotic.
ballerina0215 1 year ago
my favorite version of sleeping beauty - austrilian ballet company! i grew up watching it since i was six or seven xD that was sooo long ago. but i haven't seen any version danced better than theirs!
youyouooxx 1 year ago
I thought it was Florine, not Florestine. Correct me if I'm wrong.
watermelon2014 1 year ago
pretty tutu...ugly headpiece..
abbysfrennd40 1 year ago
I love this variation!:( Very georgeouse!
ballarinamom1 1 year ago
I love this varition!:) Very pretty!
ballarinamom1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Faster than the speed of light...
balletlol 1 year ago
stiff
xXHateCommentXx 1 year ago
We used to call them spatula hands. Great for flipping pancakes but not for ballet. Not my most favorite dancer performing this.
hamcknight 1 year ago 2
shes hardly up on pointe on her echappes! and the arms were extremely awkward. not my fave
keeleyann34 1 year ago 3
this would have worked....if she were coppelia
jk okay that was mean hahaha
mysweetsmile23 1 year ago 2
could it be just a tad faster? i don't think it broke the sound barrier!
threefourninetyfour 1 year ago
I dıdnt lıke ://
likeafirstday 1 year ago
Wow...this is awful. I would be embarrassed if I was her teacher. She's jumping onto her echappes!!! Sarah Lamb's is so much better!
snowleopard89 1 year ago
this really isnt good at all....
babyblueboxers 1 year ago
Где такие коротконожки танцуют?
rudakova1102 1 year ago
ella é demaiis *-*-* dança com mtaa leveza !
andressasantos27 1 year ago
so fast! looks a little comical, like a silent movie! lol
yelenazerk 1 year ago
Didn't like it. Too fast and she is like puppet. Australian version.
SJS404 1 year ago
mt mt mt boom .. melhor variação *0*
andressasantos27 1 year ago
she's great.
555Fiver555 2 years ago 2
the ugliest one i ever seen
birbanto24 2 years ago
she needs to keep her fucking elbows up!!!?!?!?!?!?!
compgeeek 2 years ago
too static
sbiccam 2 years ago
uhm i didn't like it at all!!!!!!!!!!
tutigoingcrazy 2 years ago 3
ı realy dıdnt lıke anythıng sorryyy ..
likeafirstday 2 years ago 2
yeah i'm on the fence 2... i'm not all that fond of this version but the sharpness of it does have a certain appeal. she looks more like a gladiator tho in that headpiece.
LiveAndBreatheBallet 2 years ago 3
i didnt like it. i felt like she wasnt giving her movements the full potential
dancebea92 2 years ago 3
the music might have been fast, but she was very sharp, and she had a great spot. :)
balletrixlestrange 2 years ago
This is my favorite variation of this. She's not quite as good as Sarah Lamb is at it, but she did it to the speed I learned it, so I like it slightly better for that reason.
tinkerbellerina134 2 years ago
the music is just a bit faster.
pinkmercy123456789 2 years ago 2
I'm not sure what to think! It was certainly very fast, but she had good technique and looked quite happy. Same choreography as Sarah Lamb, but this girl seemed to do it very differently somehow. Maybe it's just the speed.
Weird costume though. Not sure if I like the gold under the tutu or tall headpeice.
Odd echappes; she seemed to be very far back on her feet during that part. Maybe it's just the choreoghraphy.
Liked it, though!
tobyMacBallerina 2 years ago 2
I agree completely!
No, its not just the speed. This video is like the young hyper, excited little bluebird, and Sarah Lambs performance is like the older wiser, graceful bluebird. ^^ I love them both!
The costume seems fine to me, not its not as pretty as others I've seen, but it does its job. XD If I were the dancer I would certainly like Sarah Lambs costume better, but then again- each to their own. This costume fits the younger style of dance, while Sarahs fits the wiser bluebird. :)
eamileak 2 years ago 2
that's the speed I learned it at, Sarah Lamb does the slower version with a very slightly different choreography. That's my favorite version of the variation. I think the biggest difference was on her fouttes . It seemed like she didn't turn around all the way, like she stopped facing the audience, rather than the opposite side of the stage... and I also agree about her being back on her feet on the eshapes.
tinkerbellerina134 2 years ago
why is it SO fast??? lol
KittyUSF 2 years ago
she is like a robot!!
migi1994 2 years ago 26
@migi1994 i agree!!
cswmovies 1 year ago
i agree
Dancehappy911 2 years ago
eh, i really didn't like her arms or hands.
effinkiller424 2 years ago 3
dont understand all the bad rap, she had phenominal control and moved in a very interesting way. I loved it.
natasjasproat 2 years ago 2
she's just like a wooden stick or something.
what's up with the hands?
moves like a robot
leentjjj 2 years ago
ı dıdnt lıke sorry ..
likeafirstday 2 years ago 2
i dont like her headdress
lemonduh 2 years ago 2
wow, she has very tiny feet
livelovedance1294 3 years ago
I think it would have been better a little slower and slightly less stiff. she looked like she was rushing everything
ihateplaincheese11 3 years ago 3
I think its too fast! Sarah Lamb is much better!
MmeMarmelade 3 years ago 8
@MmeMarmelade Your right too fast and yes Sarah Lambs' version is much better,but check out Leanne Benjamins' performance its pretty good also.
oneill9875 1 month ago
@MmeMarmelade One more Bluebird to check out,Yuria Bolshakova,her version is also good maybe a tad slow but nice.
oneill9875 1 month ago
it's in fast camera.
yorouichi17 3 years ago
wow
this is old
dancingmansam 3 years ago
are her shoes dead?
moosterjj21 3 years ago
Beautiful
WDWlover97 3 years ago
very very robotic..
i didn't like it
rubiaa06 3 years ago 2
she is kinda stiff, i think.
LePetitDanseur2010 3 years ago
she might have been trying to imitate a bird, some people like to interpret it as this variation should be more darty and bird-like. each interpretation is different.
THEpozzle 3 years ago
BAD FEET BUT GOOD
seigrandeale 3 years ago
i really dont like her
-her arms are too stiff..
- not great feet
and - bad arabesques
britanyyyyxxx 3 years ago
she might have been trying to imitate a bird, some people like to interpret it as this variation should be more darty and bird-like. each interpretation is different.
THEpozzle 3 years ago 2
I agree.
indierocker321 3 years ago
She doesn't have the ideal body but she has excellent technique and style. She is beatiful
egomi24 3 years ago
she is very good its one of my favourite dances
minkadapink 3 years ago
Who is this?
katyisgone 4 years ago
This is Terese Power
Marika885 3 years ago
ahh, and where does she teach nowdays? i have a feeling iv had a class with her. Does she teach at the Oz?
katyisgone 3 years ago
She teaches at The National Theatre Ballet School
Marika885 3 years ago
As one of her students at this present time...I can truelly say that she still is a technition and that of her lovely standard and technique from her time she carries that across in her teaching, which is invalid and worthy of todays much higher standard and expectations. She is not too small!!! And she doesn't have awful feet....as has already been pointed out, this is form over 20 yeats now. Do not be so cocky!!! Just appreciate this eautiful art!!!
Marika885 4 years ago
Isn't it Princess Flourine?
Kaderderz137 4 years ago
she's an excellent dancer. its just her arms are a bit to stiff.
anonymouslyunique 4 years ago
I know her personally.If you think you can do better... then where is your footage. She is a beautiful dancer, with passion and energy take into concideration that this footage is from over twenty years ago.. sure put it up against today's standards and you may have a valid point, however it is timeless. everyone has there good and bad points. stop being hyper critical and have something positive to admire in other dancers.
blondekrys 4 years ago
Man, i dont think her feet are too bad!!! I like her energy, she performs it well
boggabloke 4 years ago
She's too stiff... :(
afnan1028 4 years ago
wretched feet. wretched technique. how was this put on stage?
Fattyshack 4 years ago
You guys are so mean, i bet everyone of you can do this variation better... Let's see, you all should post your fierce blue bird variations.
icarrus4u 4 years ago
She has nice turn out but shes so short and her feet are just AWFUL! and her lines! eeeek
egomi24 4 years ago
This is awful, look at the royal ballet version is much much better than this one...
Batavia007 5 years ago
gross shes barely on the block of her pointe shoes
heyyouarestupid 5 years ago
omg who is this? i must say its not very nice...
sugar45 5 years ago
meh
mipi33 5 years ago