Added: 5 years ago
From: Jairdan
Views: 94,457
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (104)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I think she leans forward too much..

  • look who is gracious and it isn´t a pro!!

    watch?v=IdGtoXfwjcM

  • watch?v=IdGtoXfwjcM

  • @Jairdan The name is "Florine", Florestan is the name of the king (Aurora's father).

  • this is actually a pretty hard variation. it takes a lot of effort to make your arms look that graceful. the music is quite fast, though

  • Where is the grace?! The beauty!?

  • she hops onto pointe too much, and her additudes are no good /:

  • She's pretty good :) her arms are kinda weird

  • woah shes like a stick eh?

  • her arems are much too robotic. its very good though. shes verry precice.

  • her arems are much too robotic.

  • my favorite version of sleeping beauty - austrilian ballet company! i grew up watching it since i was six or seven xD that was sooo long ago. but i haven't seen any version danced better than theirs!

  • I thought it was Florine, not Florestine.  Correct me if I'm wrong.

  • pretty tutu...ugly headpiece..

  • I love this variation!:( Very georgeouse!

  • I love this varition!:) Very pretty!

  • stiff

  • We used to call them spatula hands. Great for flipping pancakes but not for ballet. Not my most favorite dancer performing this.

  • shes hardly up on pointe on her echappes! and the arms were extremely awkward. not my fave

  • this would have worked....if she were coppelia

    jk okay that was mean hahaha

  • could it be just a tad faster? i don't think it broke the sound barrier!

  • I dıdnt lıke ://

  • Wow...this is awful. I would be embarrassed if I was her teacher. She's jumping onto her echappes!!! Sarah Lamb's is so much better!

  • this really isnt good at all....

  • Где такие коротконожки танцуют?

  • ella é demaiis *-*-* dança com mtaa leveza !

  • so fast! looks a little comical, like a silent movie! lol

  • Didn't like it. Too fast and she is like puppet. Australian version.

  • mt mt mt boom .. melhor variação *0*

  • she's great.

  • the ugliest one i ever seen

  • she needs to keep her fucking elbows up!!!?!?!?!?!?!

  • too static

  • uhm i didn't like it at all!!!!!!!!!!

  • ı realy dıdnt lıke anythıng sorryyy ..

  • yeah i'm on the fence 2... i'm not all that fond of this version but the sharpness of it does have a certain appeal. she looks more like a gladiator tho in that headpiece.

  • i didnt like it. i felt like she wasnt giving her movements the full potential

  • the music might have been fast, but she was very sharp, and she had a great spot. :)

  • This is my favorite variation of this. She's not quite as good as Sarah Lamb is at it, but she did it to the speed I learned it, so I like it slightly better for that reason.

  • the music is just a bit faster.

  • I'm not sure what to think! It was certainly very fast, but she had good technique and looked quite happy. Same choreography as Sarah Lamb, but this girl seemed to do it very differently somehow. Maybe it's just the speed.

    Weird costume though. Not sure if I like the gold under the tutu or tall headpeice.

    Odd echappes; she seemed to be very far back on her feet during that part. Maybe it's just the choreoghraphy.

    Liked it, though!

  • I agree completely!

    No, its not just the speed. This video is like the young hyper, excited little bluebird, and Sarah Lambs performance is like the older wiser, graceful bluebird. ^^ I love them both!

    The costume seems fine to me, not its not as pretty as others I've seen, but it does its job. XD If I were the dancer I would certainly like Sarah Lambs costume better, but then again- each to their own. This costume fits the younger style of dance, while Sarahs fits the wiser bluebird. :)

  • that's the speed I learned it at, Sarah Lamb does the slower version with a very slightly different choreography. That's my favorite version of the variation. I think the biggest difference was on her fouttes . It seemed like she didn't turn around all the way, like she stopped facing the audience, rather than the opposite side of the stage... and I also agree about her being back on her feet on the eshapes.

  • why is it SO fast??? lol

  • she is like a robot!!

  • @migi1994 i agree!!

    

  • i agree

  • eh, i really didn't like her arms or hands.

  • dont understand all the bad rap, she had phenominal control and moved in a very interesting way. I loved it.

  • she's just like a wooden stick or something.

    what's up with the hands?

    moves like a robot

  • ı dıdnt lıke sorry ..

  • i dont like her headdress

  • wow, she has very tiny feet

  • I think it would have been better a little slower and slightly less stiff. she looked like she was rushing everything

  • I think its too fast! Sarah Lamb is much better!

  • @MmeMarmelade Your right too fast and yes Sarah Lambs' version is much better,but check out Leanne Benjamins' performance its pretty good also.

  • @MmeMarmelade One more Bluebird to check out,Yuria Bolshakova,her version is also good maybe a tad slow but nice.

  • it's in fast camera.

  • wow

    this is old

  • are her shoes dead?

  • Beautiful

  • very very robotic..

    i didn't like it

  • she is kinda stiff, i think.

  • she might have been trying to imitate a bird, some people like to interpret it as this variation should be more darty and bird-like. each interpretation is different.

  • BAD FEET BUT GOOD

  • i really dont like her

    -her arms are too stiff..

    - not great feet

    and - bad arabesques

  • she might have been trying to imitate a bird, some people like to interpret it as this variation should be more darty and bird-like. each interpretation is different.

  • I agree.

  • She doesn't have the ideal body but she has excellent technique and style. She is beatiful

  • she is very good its one of my favourite dances

  • Who is this?

  • This is Terese Power

  • ahh, and where does she teach nowdays? i have a feeling iv had a class with her. Does she teach at the Oz?

  • She teaches at The National Theatre Ballet School

  • As one of her students at this present time...I can truelly say that she still is a technition and that of her lovely standard and technique from her time she carries that across in her teaching, which is invalid and worthy of todays much higher standard and expectations. She is not too small!!! And she doesn't have awful feet....as has already been pointed out, this is form over 20 yeats now. Do not be so cocky!!! Just appreciate this eautiful art!!!

  • Isn't it Princess Flourine?

  • she's an excellent dancer. its just her arms are a bit to stiff.

  • I know her personally.If you think you can do better... then where is your footage. She is a beautiful dancer, with passion and energy take into concideration that this footage is from over twenty years ago.. sure put it up against today's standards and you may have a valid point, however it is timeless. everyone has there good and bad points. stop being hyper critical and have something positive to admire in other dancers.

  • Man, i dont think her feet are too bad!!! I like her energy, she performs it well

  • She's too stiff... :(

  • wretched feet. wretched technique. how was this put on stage?

  • You guys are so mean, i bet everyone of you can do this variation better... Let's see, you all should post your fierce blue bird variations.

  • She has nice turn out but shes so short and her feet are just AWFUL! and her lines! eeeek

  • This is awful, look at the royal ballet version is much much better than this one...

  • gross shes barely on the block of her pointe shoes

  • omg who is this? i must say its not very nice...

  • meh

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more