911 Mysteries - WTC 7 new flashes bigger & slower

[MrEnterthehole]

Incredible how people with no understanding of the most basics of physics will assure others of the truth in something easily disproved.

[Haxor1021]

This collapse of WTC 7 is evidence that was inside job. Bush, Silverstein etc. They are Terrorists!

[BIGINSF]

again, this does not mean that I believe the building was not brought down by explosives or other method.

[BIGINSF]

I believe this building was imploded purposely, but the flashes you see are just windows being blown out and dust being forced out of them with the 100mph winds caused by the pressure increase inside the building. Think of it like an accordian with a hole in it's side. The air escapes from the whole when pressure is applied.

[1WildlandFirefighter]

@BIGINSF

Why didn't the other ones in the middle do that at the same time then since each level is collapsed at the same time? Hm

[tryithere]

That's the sunlight reflecting off of window panels blown out by the air pressure from inside the falling building and caught in the winds outside of the building. Do you have any common sense?

[BlisterHiker]

Oh boy, another "truther" who sees flashes of explosions where in fact large pieces of glass from windows were flying and reflecting light like glass usually does.

This video is worthless garbage. Well deserved thumb down.

[splendid1000]

Uhh, the base is taken out first you moron. The lower half is collapsed bottom to top, before the upper levels. Thats how it achieves free fall speed for the first couple seconds and avoids any local collapse.

[MrNoblemanoflove]

Makes you feel like your living in cartoonland don't it folks? Don't focus on the color of the turd we've been handed. Just know it is a turd. All but a few held this turd long enough. Time to put it down. Whatever was used blew it to hell.

[MrManilla09]

did you ever think that windows could reflect sunlight. minute details about bullshit. you people who find this shit are fucking stupid for even thinking its demo. its a fucking building with hundreds of windows collapsing. the windows were obviously blowing out. dumb fucks

[bambam9969]

I agree anyone with eyes can see that building was imploded. just like the towers.

[CrazyRay7979]

@bambam9969

How about anyone with PROOF?

If it's "so obvious" then why is there no proof?

You Truthers are so blinded by the lies of the people that are profiting off of the conspiracy theories with their organizations, websites, public appearances, videos, and books...anyone at the head of a conspiracy group is making money off of the conspiracy theories and are feeding you lies that you are buying.

Maybe one day Truthers will smarten up and look at the real facts

[biggbrattz]

@bambam9969 You eyesight is so good you can see stuff that isn't even there!! Do your homework. The reasons for the collapse of WTC 7 are not being questioned by anyone with proper credentials. We know why it fell. Why do you keep disregarding the hard evidence, and spewing foolish nonsense? To those who have followed the analyses right to the end, you sound very silly.

[WilliamAztech]

@biggbrattz I have solid information that alien laser beams were used to weaken the structures the night before.

[biggbrattz]

@WilliamAztech Oh yaaa? COOOOL!! ...Tell me more. I just knew it was aliens all along!!

[WilliamAztech]

@biggbrattz I'm glad you believe me, although there is a school of thought that claim to have solid evidence it was Satan himself that pulled it down from hell.

[biggbrattz]

@WilliamAztech Hmmmm...Satan or aliens....? That must be a tough choice for some people.

[drugwhore]

you dont need to see a single flash to know it was bombs that took that building down 

[davisotj1]

okay, i was there the whole time from the moment the first plane hit to the collapse of bldg 7. i didnt hear a single goddamn explosion in any of the buildings before or while they fell. and besides, setting up that many charges would require many weeks to set up, not to mention they would have to knock through walls to access the support beams in all of the towers PRIOR to 9/11. i think some of the tenants would have noticed all that noise

[Headshothorror4488]

U hear them on another vid, and u hear people saying wow, 2 pops, flash, its not a argument anymore so just say you have no brain instead of its not true, everyone knows so if you dont your a moron

[Headshothorror4488]

Masterod, you know this was on other buildings and above the crash so the window glass shit is bullshit made up to make u say o well ok if thats what they say. Dont be blind , u trust the gov ? U r a moron then, proof is all over its not a argument anymore

[masterod1]

you know.. glass..breaks..and reflex's light.. and video.. distorts..

[ViperXXXXXXX]

Whatever is actually happening here is much bigger than 9/11 and it's much bigger than any of us are probably going to get the privilege to know.

[guitarpick1994]

type in obama deception on google and yahoo

[Bragzz]

Dude its a building coming down. There are bound to be things inside of it that will make some sort of flash. We all know it was controlled, however, when you post videos like this as if it were the proof, you give debunkers a fucking boner.

And then you went and embarrassed yourself on AboveTopSecret.

[michaeledith]

Well done footjob56 nice zoom-in, 7 was a demo job, towers where bomb as well...Nixon empowered E.P.A. 1970, 911 E.P.A. said the air was safe to breath, April 2010 Judge Alvin Hellerstein ruled that the air was not safe to breath the air was toxic at ground zero 10000 workers are sick or dying from this (safe) toxic air.E.P.A. LIED ,E.P.A. IS GOV. CONTROL DEP. and we are to trust N.I.S.T is telling the truth..

[Skeptic121]

Let us say these flashes were objects being ejected from the windows. Debunkers claim that WTC7 compressed its inside air by dropping, and claim that the compressed air blew these objects out the windows. Fine, but how is such an explanation consistent with the official NIST version of the collapse? NIST claims the interior of WTC7 was gutted, and the roof open to the sky, before WTC7 started to drop. How could an open-top, gutted WTC7 compress air as it fell?

[missjamespage]

my god, this is frightening. the lid is going to blow of 9/11 in the next few years. I cant see how ppl can tell themselves fires brought down this building and WTC 1&2. Look at how all the building feel in practically the same manner. Our GOVERNMENT not only fialed us, they did this

[RobertMOdell]

@missjamespage "The government" did not do this. Criminals did this. Were some of them working in government? Most likely. But don't blame the government itself.

[bingcrosbie1]

@missjamespage yes they did indeed its a fact

[choclatesaltyballz]

americans are the stupidest fucking people on earth

[Spherian7]

This is a great one - you can actually see the chunk of whatever with the cutting charge flying towards the camera and then exploding, leaving a tight cloud of black smoke. Now go to "New collapse footage of WTC7 and North Tower" and you can see the SAME charge going off high and proud and as brilliant as any 4th of July firework. Then go to "Some Building Demolitions" which shows a Ft Worth skyscraper demolition which throws off two cutting charges up over the collapse EXACTLY like this 1.

[zenoist2]

Freefall in any language implies it is collapsing into a vacuum.

For this this to happen the normal air has to be removed exactly like in an explosion which is expelling everything outwards..

A normal collapse would build up a lot of air pressure beneath as the floors fell down and create some resistance,but this didnt happen as NIST freely admits.

They are obviously at a loss to explain it ruling out explosives, bombs or whatever.

7 was a controlled demolition.

[robertaklinck]

There are flashes in the air above the building as it drops.

[zenoist2]

I saw those too robertaklinck.

I have to be honest and say I have no idea what they are.

Cool video BTW footjob and good evidence.

[mootness]

Can someone explain the pop / puff of black smoke at .06, .22 and .39 Any speculation as to what this is?

[garrus92]

All this guy has done is zoom in the video and make it go slower

[HauntedBlueEyes]

Interesting how the video mentions pops, but there's no audio.

[hgfbob]

American Institute of Architects (AIA) 2009 National Convention and Design Exposition,

"We have a structural engineer who is also an architect stop by and sign our petition who has worked on 50 to 60 story buildings. He was completely unaware of the FREE FALL ACCELERATION of building 7 and immediately acknowledged that this implies a 'controlled demolition'."

ae911truth. org

[hgfbob]

as soon as the kink is formed, the HVAC, 'other'PentHouse, roof, facade, within 0.5 seconds from each other, have free fall ACCELERATION for 100+ft. ALL support was INSTANTLY taken away, AS WE SEE by the EVEN decent

if there was a progression from east to west

WE WOULD SEE IT

the roof WILL NOT support itself while columns fail below it. the facade is a non supporting structure, and IS attached to the perimeter columns it will not stand while the columns fail behind it.

[hgfbob]

as soon as the kink is formed, the top 2/3 of the 'ENTIRE" building, AT THE SAME TIME, is falling at a rate, equivalent to the acceleration of gravity. This occurs at t=1.75s and t=4.0s of the collapse...over 1/3 of the collapse time, the building is falling, with 'NOTHING' underneath it. That is the 'ONLY' way to achieve the rate of 9.8m/s^2

Vertical support was 'REMOVED', not weakened

If the columns were weakened, they still 'HAVE' to offer resistance...then there would be 'NO' free fall

[hgfbob]

-then, how do you get,'EVERY' column to act the same way, at the same time, unless they are under the 'SAME' conditions, and acted on by the 'SAME' force???

as soon as the kink is formed, the 'ENTIRE' building,evenly falls at 9.8m/s^2 for 2.25 seconds,(t=1.75s to t=4.0s [NICSTAR 1A 3.6])

Acceleration of gravity...at 4.0s of the collapse, the 'ENTIRE'building is falling faster than 80 ft.a second...'ONLY' possible by removing 'ALL' resistance...nothing in the way

[xoxAshh137]

this is prob a dumb question but im not too sure,

would you die instantly if you were standing on top of the building or would you die once it hit the groud

[pask54]

I think you would be crushed. I often wondered if someone could have held on to the radio transmitter and ridden it as it came down. If the stop wasn't abrupt, you could just step off it. Why weren't more people rescued by helicopter from the top?

[Skeptic121]

In the high def version of the "VEOH video" one can see that the "flashes" are really windows and papers and maybe drywall being blown out.

The official story believers say it blew out because of an "accordion effect" of the falling building. However, they also say the roof had collapsed and the interior was gutted before it fell. It seems to me they want it both ways!

I have to figure out how to post high-def on YouTube and not lose the detail...

[marek0086]

i know that 9/11 was an inside job...but these 'flashes' are just light reflection from the moving windows.

[hgfbob]

i know that 9/11 was an inside job...but these 'flashes' are just light reflection from the moving windows.

that side of the building is in the shade of the sun..there is no light reflection on the windows...and you don't see reflection till pieces of debris get above the falling building in the sun light

[marek0086]

these "flashes" are clearly the windows reflecting the light!

Who cares about this shit anyway..... there are MANY other more damning pieces of evidence out there.

[hgfbob]

"there are MANY other more damning pieces of evidence out there"-

-100% correct

-[NICSTAR 1A 3.6]"constant, downward acceleration during this time interval. This acceleration was 32f/s^2 (9.8m/s^2), equivalent to the acceleration of gravity.

This free fall drop continues for approximately 8 stories or 32 meters,(105ft.), the distance traveled between t=1.75s and t=4.0 s.

[pask54]

but that doesn't answer the squibs going off prematurely and blowing out the side.

[richardcameron]

debris. wow.

[hgfbob]

as soon as the kink is formed, the building is 'falling through the AIR', [NICSTAR 1A 3.6]

over 100 ft. of vertical supporting structure, instantly, removed, across the 'WHOLE' building....to produce a symeterical free fall, straight down

[FalconXE302]

Maybe they were silent explosives... hang on... ALL explosions make sound...

WTC North and South towers DID NOT fall like a controlled demolition.. watch the video's and you can see the upper floors collapsing one upon another and then quite quickly started spreading out in an uncontrolled manner, because the floors beneath them were not being blown up by demolition charges.

WTC 7 did fall very much like a controlled demolition... But does that mean it was??? Simply put NO. "cause and effect"!

[marek0086]

do u know how stupid u are??

Even after seeing WTC7 crumble the way it did....you still dont think its an inside job?!

I think you're just trying to lie to yourself... so your world seems much safer than it really is. Either that, or your just really stupid and cant discern whats going on around u.

[FalconXE302]

I smart enough to know that sheep like you are so easily led astray and convinced of things with no proof what-so-ever.

Get a grip of real-life reality... not "YouTube reality" Einstein...

People like you are such good value on YouTube... you make us all laugh...

Please feel free to share your theories with us all... are they your own original theories or just a re-hash of some old theory...

[marek0086]

here we go....another dumb ass!.

Come back when u know something about physics.

You're the sheep!

[FalconXE302]

Still waiting for your theories Einstein????

[marek0086]

you're a total retard.

look at all the evidence and its as clear as day that it was an inside job.

Likei said....u either havnt looked into it much OR you're just supremely stupid. End of story.

[pask54]

What would you care about us anyway? Yer an aussy! You are entitled to your opinion, but so are we and if you don't like that you know where you can go!

[FalconXE302]

I care about it because the day it happened my heart wept for days and days. Plus a lot of tears. Aussies and Americans are very much alike. we live similar lives, in free countries.

Aussies with a heart really felt for all Americans on 9/11. I know everyone will believe what they want on how 9/11 happened. For me, I get a little angry when I see blatantly silly theories on 9/11, that have NO sensible proof, so I state my opinion. It happened in USA, but it affected all the free world.

[jesterua67]

Buddy , you are such a fall down , if you believe that story you're exactely what GWB wants you to be. A yes man that doesnt question the world around him , just jumps off the cliff with the rest of the lemmings.

[ChrisJ4567]

No, it's not possible, because you would see the explosions, and even if they were difficult to see, there's absolutely no doubt that you would HEAR the explosions prior to collapse, and after watching every video of the towers' collapse I could possibly find, I've never heard any explosions.

[moviedude111]

NIST states "No steel was recovered from WTC 7" while FEMA section C.2 shows that at least one piece of WTC 7 steel was tested, with the results being alarming, considering the highly unusual formation of a liquid eutectic, intergranular melting, and erosion. Features not seen before, by the experienced investigators, in steel subject to common office fires.

[moviedude111]

FEMA Section C.6 Suggestions for Future Research states "It is also possible that the intergranular melting, eutectic formation, and erosion phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel structure."

[moviedude111]

any scientists working for and associated with NIST have experience with nanoenergetic compounds, or nanothermites, that have the potential to be used for building demolitions. And because nanothermites are primarily high-temperature incendiaries rather than explosives, they could cause damage to steel structures without producing the sound and destruction levels associated with RDX.

[ScaryKid1015]

@moviedude111 in my mind this makes a lot more sense than explosives being used. charges weren't even heard before or during WTC7's collapse. i've always been confused about buildings 1 and 2. there seems to be a fair deal of evidence suggesting explosives there, but they wouldn't be needed with top of the line incendiaries.

[rubeeye127]

@ScaryKid1015 "charges weren't even heard before or during WTC7's collapse"

Sorry bro but you're very wrong.

watch?v=FLqb-Qyz0CI

[ScaryKid1015]

@rubeeye127 very wrong? i wouldn't use such emphasis. in that video, separate explosions are heard at different times. whether 9/11 debunkers use very crisp and loud demolition example clips or not is kind of immaterial. for a demolition of such magnitude to be carried out with such explosives, a LOT more would have been heard, even in the quiet collapse clip. i know 9/11 was an inside job, but i find it VERY unlikely that conventional methods were used, such as "normal" explosives.

[cornskid]

@moviedude111 if you think the collapse of WTC1-2 looked anything remotely like the collapse of 7 then I strongly suggest you visit your occulist.

[usindependent50]

@moviedude111

Thermitic materials are terrible for controlled demolitions. That's why they dont use them for controlled demolitions. They are chaotic and unprecise.

[WhatsReallyGoingOnUS]

@usindependent50 See the videos by engineer John Cole, who uses normal thermite to cut through A36 structural steel beams. His experiments are just a backyard experiment. I'm sure that our govt could come up with more sophisticated, and much more precise cutter charges than Cole.

watch?v=Qamecech9m4&feature=re­sults_video&playnext=1&list=PL­250BEBF8FB141E71

[VCat2006]

My eyes aren't washed with brain... where are those videos?

[ChrisJ4567]

Wow, there is not one single cutter charge displayed in this video. Thank you for clearing up the fact that there were no cutter charges fired prior or during the collapse of WTC7. Also, thank you for editing out the sound. By doing this you've demonstrated how conspiracy theorists distort evidence to make a point. Why not leave in the audio if you have nothing to hide? It's because we will not hear any explosions, that's why.

[theairupthere8]

So, footjob56, why do the "cutting charges" fire AFTER the building has begun to fall? You're a moron. End of story.

[footjob56]

You too, thanks anyway.

[theairupthere8]

Haha you have absolutely nothing to say. That is a definite twoofer first. No longer arguing because he knows he's been had. I'll be here all week.

[tornadomad]

@theairupthere8 OMG that's what i've been trying to explain!!! THANK YOU FOR NOT BEING A CONSPIRATOR. you are FUCKING AWESOME

[arisuta2]

@theairupthere8, because, unlike a normal CD where the whole lot go off at once with a tremendous bang, this was meant to be more surrepticious so the charges went off in a rolling wave, starting at the bottom.

[aubney1]

@theairupthere8 because they start at the bottom and work up 

[saxoniano]

@theairupthere8

wtc 7 was a bottom/top controlled demolition...

therfore the charges started from the lower floor ....hence you can see the charges going off on the top floors when building already collapsing....

that allowed the building to collapse on its own footprint......

they wanted NOT to damage other buildings around...

YOU ARE THE MORON HERE...

end of story

[SAYYOURROSARY]

@theairupthere8 To break it up into managable sections . That's why they were still popping off on the way down . Without that it would be a big solid square sitting there like it should be . When #7 fell down

a bunch of government problems went away . That's why you see those blasts ....no more problems .

and a bonus "war" to spread Demonacracy and abortion boot !

[tryithere]

@SAYYOURROSARY What government problems went away? Do you think they couldn't have just taken paperwork out of the building and burned it or shredded it. Do you think the government doesn't have shredders? Don't you think they would be more worried about secret documents flying out of the building and scattering all over the place? My mom had WTC papers in her yard and that was in south Brooklyn.

[SAYYOURROSARY]

@tryithere The building contained the case against ENRON and many other high profile cases .

That's why they imploded it . No they could not just shred it fool !. It's just like the Pentacon the alleged

"airplane flew right into the window where they were looking for the missing 2 .3 TRILLION that went missing on 9-10-01 2..3 TRILLION ! Those "evil Muslims" sure were smart and acurate 3 times

in one day ! lol You are a Fool !

[q41n]

@theairupthere8 they don't silly child

[topcoatpaver]

@theairupthere8 You have blinders on. Take them off and see what happened...

[patriot4u]

Thought the fire was at lower floor what are puffs of smoke doing at top floors?? Wow a close inspection shows the cutting charges going off in rapid sequence. A 47 story class-A buld falling from fire on 8 sec is a joke. BBC announced it falling 25 before it happened now that is news!

[VCat2006]

Firefighters knew it was gonna fall. Silverstein said so.

What i'm wondering is why were more heavily hit buildings in better shape after 9/11, and where i can find a clear image of the WTC7 south side damage caused by the North Tower collapse.

[bweazel]

To my knowledge there are no shots of the damage sustained to the south side. There are however, videos of the south side of 7WTC prior to the collapse. It is covered in a thick sheet of smoke coming out of all floors. You can tell there has been some damage, but I have yet to see any serious damage that would cause the building to fall uniformly as it did. Check my page later. I'll post the two vids of the south side.

[oxus72]

footjob56, thanks to you I don't have to make this exact enlargement video! I'm waiting for the "window reflection" ppl to come here and explain what kind of reflection it is that produces black spherical puffs in the air.

[Beto805Cali]

WTC7 had pull down blinds, wat u see is a series of windows breaking and their blinds billowing in the wind

[oxus72]

Billowing blinds are not typically famous for producing flashes followed by black spherical puffs 10 meters above building roofs. Maybe an (airborne) transformer station again...

[Beto805Cali]

no, but a falling building is, there is no dust at da windows like the puffs of dust on the 2 towers when they are falling down, there is dust on top of the buliding, but just because its falling, what da fuck do u expect from a falling building, and what flashes jackass?

[oxus72]

Beto805Cali, I first intended to go on debating with you, but then I realised the truth of it all -- a guy who speaks such impressive big words and insults as you just has to be a genius and per consequence I must be way out there. You've opened my eyes, and I love you. Kiss on the mouth!

[Beto805Cali]

naw man, shit, naw, i was wrong, sorry but your right, i now see that your right, it MUST have beed the government, there is absolutely no possible way it was structural damage, besides all the facts disproving it, and me ignoring it, it must have been demolished.thank you