NSX is faster than a ws6, the NSX from the factory is lighter and has almost same HP and the NSX is MR, on a highway the NSX will eat the WS-6 all day long.
Fuck Domestics, If the Japs really wanted to build V8's V12's ect. they would and can and i bet they would be way better than any American piece of shit engine. It just a wast of time, If you really know how to design a car and engine you don't need the extra weight plus its a waste of fuel.
LOL 3L V-6 smokes a 6L V-8 muscle in a roll-on... pretty sad when you consider the fact that the NSX was made for superior handling, not drag racing (like the Ws6)
the ws6 is a 5.7 L for one. And this is an lt1 that is inferior to the ls1 by miles. Plus the lt1 is a 2 valve per cylinder pushrod engine. The nsx is dohc 4 valve per cylinder. stfu
@bliglum You assume the WS6 is "muscle" and built for drag racing because it has a V8. How amusing. Did you know that the NSX costed a shit load more than the WS6? And it just barely beats it. What a piece of shit.
@OsakaBancho Is a Trans am not a "muscle" car? And yes, I am aware of the road racing series for which it was named, but times have changed, trans am didn't. Also, I did'nt know NSX costed alot more!! I thot it was tha same price.!!! I mean, it's made of aluminum like cheap cans, and only has a V-6!! You're RIGHT! What a piece of shit!!!!!.... No, not really. What an ignorant thing to say.
@Model192 Thats because the cars they are racing have engines that are about half the size... Also, being fast on a nice smooth racetrack is pretty easy for a live axle car. However, things get unnecessarily tricky when things get uneven. Finally, don't believe everything you see on tv ; )
@Model192 hmm.... so because a professional driver can handle a extremely tuned one-purpose car on a track they practice on you think any one can take there mustangs out and do what they do?....its easier handling a stock nsx like a pro than a heavily modded american track car..and thats not because american cars need more skill its because japanese cars handle better....overall they are better...less expensive,more reliable,better economy,better performance,easier to work with
@KOOPA1020 I think you missed the part where it says AMATEUR. You're wrong on all accounts, regardless, because I have a track car with 226,000 miles on it and my pistons tops are STILL shiny and I'm STILL getting 53 PSI oil pressure. Shut the fuck up about what you don't know.
@Model192 "shut the fuck up about what you don't know".... it sounds like to me like you don't know proper grammar... that is a plus and negative for you.. negative ,you sound like an uneduacated idiot.. ,positive, i won't argue with you because debates with dumb people get no where...
@Model192 or maybe the correct answer is i am corrrect and don't feel i have to humilate you to prove something to an idiot... don't reply.. your late arguements are as useless as ricer fly-by's... just pointless after you've lost
@KOOPA1020 And at the end of the day I'm the one with the track car at 226,000 miles. Living, empirical proof for all the reasons you're wrong. Grats.
I don't think that was a WS6 because it had the older front end onit. Maybe it was but that car didn't have a LS1 it had the LT1 wich was a shitty engine. But good kill NSX.
Its a fact I can't state a fact. All I meant about that is that the Mclaren F1 was modeled off of the NSX. The NSX was one of the fastest things to come out in its day, The only problem with it is they never made any improvements on it. It is a fine vehicle.
I like NSX's. I miss the 90's. The NSX, the TT Supra, the Corvette ZR1. Yes, I realize they are all different classes but I'm just saying like "hey, hey. the 90's were cool:)"
The only thing that video told me was the nsx had more horsepower ... go from a dig and lets see all the torque from that lt1 put about 2 cars on that nsx. That is if the ws6 driver knows how to launch
excuses.. it lost this was from a roll sticky tires.? the nsx does 4.6 0-60 the LS1 aint gionne beat that. the LS! might get inthe low 5 second range no excuses it lost to a 292 low trq car.
Everyone takes offense when someone's opinion on here doesn't match theirs. Why argue that hp matters but torque doesn't? That doesn't even make sense. They're both important but in lower revving cars Torque is more important cause that's the powerband the car stays in. I'm not trying to start fights with anyone. Bottom line, Fastest stock NSX runs a 13.3 in the 1/4, WS6s have run in the 12s bone stock. If you wanna pay $80,000 for a 13 second car be my guest. 175 mph isn't impressive either.
yeah my 99 camaro runs 13.07 in the 1/4 and that was a lt1 car chisel nose! ls1 kill those cars so im guessing it would be diffrent with a ls1 if its barley out running the lt1 i know my b4c car will smoke it!!! hands down
trq is for american who believe trq wins races. dont gimmie no shit about weight oranything else. the S2000 has a measly 153lb of trq while a mustang GT and camaro put wellover 300LB of trq and the s2000 beats both. HP&gears win races you really need tostop believe what you hear.
What do you mean weight has no bearing?? A 600cc Yamaha R6 has less wheel hp & ft.lbs and rapes an S2k in every single aspect.
A S2k won't beat a Camaro in a drag race, unless the Camaro driver is absolutely horrible. An LS1 Camaro is a solid mid/low 13 second car with a decent driver, where as the S2k runs in the mid14's as well as the '99-'04 Mustang GT's with a decent driver.
Yeah everyone knows that in stock form there really not quick if you think about it a k-swaped ek with a good tune and some minor bolt ons would walk nsx all day. There really kind of heavy and underpowered. Now you put a blower or turbo on that nsx and you got your self a hella fast car.
was lucky? it won period. bototm line your 5.7 liter lost to a 3.2 liter. dont get mad dont hate dont do anything but all you fuckin GM bankrupt mother fuckes whine and bytch. u lost and that NSX will flip 0-60 in about 4.7 seconds. its 292 HP at 3000lb. ur shitty cars are 5.7 liters pushing what 350HP? u giot engine size more torqie and more HP there isnt a reason you shoudl of won. guess all that toriqe didnt win that race LMAO trq dont win its called HP/gears win races. fuck GM shitboxes
First of all you dip shit, that is an LT1 5.7 285 hp Trans Am, you fucking idiot. and it costs a fraction of what you shitty as ricer does. now, if you would of raced an LS1 Trans Am WS6, your ricer would have shit against it you fucking dumb ass get out of here with your shitty 4 and 6 cylinder cars, those are for women and kids not for men. There is nothing better than a V8 spanking on ricers and European V10 and V12. lol
u my moronic barbaric poor excuse for a american. lets get some facst right. 1st your gm, dodge, ford all all junk the govcernment owns gm well 60%+ your interiors are plastic parts from dollar general. dodge is terrible. your 5.7 liter pushign what 300HP 350? weak sauce. imports get 330 HP out of 3.7 liters. the bototm line is this a ricer 3.2 stock 2 liter smoked your car. get over you lost. and son, dont talk shit to me cuz face to face u would shake my hand. u aint gonna do shit.
you are wrong again buddy, I've seen Dodge Neons making like 550 Hp and running 10's in the quarter mile. we can make powerful four cylinder cars also, but a V8 is an American tradition you moron. pluse out V8 ZR1 is making as much hp as a V12 Lambo or Ferrari, so I don't know what you are trying to prove to me. and plastic... well I like plastic it looks nice.
yeah with 30lb of boost and dont gimmie no shit about oh yeah i had this neon with 550 HP and it holds up great and its reliable blahblah blah neons and srt-4 are very problematic. its a known fact i have fri\ends who have them they have shit from engine issues to losing oil, boost leak, etc.etc..etc.. while my import has no issues. and modded.
you know I've been shopping around for another 2002 Trans Am or a Corvette, and I haven't seen any of them with leaking parts. I've had my T/A since 2000 and it's a 1998 and I have never had any issues from the engine, transmission, axle, drive train or suspension. only problem was the waterpump seals went bad and the knock sensors and that is it. and it's still running like new with170k mile. Take that bitch! lol
Dude. I have a 98 Grand prix GTP. 200k on it runs like new, no leaks, no problems. By the way I get 30-36mpg on the highway in a heavy ass car with a boosted V6
yeah, ok LMAO gtp grand prix whats it worth a dime quarter? get the fuck out of here man. car is a POS and u and i both know it. only a fool talks shit abotu a car he cant afford. the nsx is byf ar superior then most american cars.
Learn to read. I didn't talk shit about any car. I'm sorry if you think my car's a piece of shit, but no, I've beaten a lot of imports. Imports that are slower and get worse gas mileage and probably won't last as long. Pull the stick out of your ass and stop being a dick.
No they're supercharged 3.8L. Yes, around where I live (omaha nebraska) I get about 36 on the highway. doing 80 up to colorado I got 30-33, depending on whether or not I was driving through heavy construction.
0-60 in 4.7 seconds isn't very impressive for a 292hp car weighing 3000 lbs. Mach 1 Mustangs (03-04) put down 305hp and weigh just shy of 3500 lbs and match that 0-60. NSX would be a much better contender if it didn't have pizza cutter tires and put down more than 220 lbs of torque. I would guess a stock WS6 would eat a stock NSX alive. It has over 100 more lbs of torque for the first 5200 rpms and over 50 more hp throughout the entire rpm range. Only weighs like 400 lbs more.
imagine that not very impressive but impressive enough to beat a LS1 GREAT chevy motor. the bottomline is this nsx>chevy ws6 both are cars the nsx is a great cxar the ws6 is a good car. it lost take it like a man. your talking about a 292 HP rev line of 8300 revs all this on a stock 3.2 liter. u need togive credit whendue and not only that the nsx would whoop a WS6 on a track straight lineor with turns. the ws6 is a good car but hardly the car the nsx is.
ur the stupidest shit to ever talk. the king of racing Carol Shelby said "Horsepower sales cars, but torque wins races"...puya go play need for speed lil douche
Lol. Ok I'd say 5.6 is pretty good. Im just happy knowing I have a nice car. So the nsx is better? ummm Are you trying to prove something because I couldnt care less. Grow up.
ur the stupidest shit to ever talk. the king of racing Carol Shelby said "Horsepower sales cars, but torque wins races"...puya go play need for speed lil douche
v10viper04 said TORQUE doesnt matter hes a dumbass. you dont know shit about cars you only think its about hoesepower when its to about torque, weight, handling.......
And torque really doesn't matter you fuckin jerkoff, Torque gets you going horsepower keeps you going. Look it up dumbass, thats why V8's alwasy rape imports off the line. The torque! (which imports DON'T have) Learn your facts stupid ass.
Do you really think i care that you talk shit about stangs? They ARE slow. Plus the NSX and M3 are how much more money? Your an idiot, learn about cars in the same price range dumbass.
ur the stupidest shit to ever talk. the king of racing Carol Shelby said "Horsepower sales cars, but torque wins races"...puya go play need for speed lil douche
theres no need to talk shit. Horsepower gets you in the top end. And go play need for speed? Lol, if you havent noticed I OWN a 95 trans am. hahah good one.
the nsx is a fast car and so is the ws6. but lets face it. nobody was ever inspired to build what used to be the world's fastest production car because of a ws6. the mclaren F1 was the car inspired by the nsx. if you honda haters knew anything about the nsx other than what you read in magazines then you'd bow down. remember that next time you see an nsx. and just look the other way cause you are not worthy.
haha you suck at life. that is all. my info comes straight from the man's mouth himself. gordan murray the creator of the f1. why don't you just put your hand down. cause schools in session...honda style!!!
mystang 115 haha u and ur v6 stang will never come close to beating an nsx.. u almost beat him? lol lol lol lol as in he pulled 8 10 cars on u... that s not almost buddy.. wake up lil guy
How did that NSX win?? Is it modded?? I almost beat one in my V6 stang! I thought this WS6 would walk that overpriced(but kickass and gorgeous) Acura. All nice cars tho!
I think you need to research the NSX a little more. If you look here on Youtube, you will see the NSX beating many different mustangs, 5.0 and MACHs. The NSX might not be as slow as you think ;-)
ummmm lol you deff wouldnt almost beat one in a v6 stang nsx are now joke there light as hell all carbo fiber hahaha v6 stang u guys will say u beat anything the other day i beat a bugatti it was crazy dude
I traveled here through many Prelude videos, which led me to the NSX pages, I see countless comments about american cars and how great they are, but when it comes to the video where the other side wins, these clowns don't say anything.
I see that the neanderthawl rednecks defend breathlessly the american car, but have no idea that Ford, GM, and Chrysler are more foreign than Toyota, and Honda, and even a shitty Hyundai!
not all of us are rednecks. i for one know that me and a vast majority of other ls1 owners understand that power is power no matter what its in. the only difference is the potential of power and price. the ultimate goal for an nsx (road track) for example would be much different than the goal of a muscle car owner(straight line). anything can go fast, quit bashin it just because of where its from.
this is true, I for one do not DISlike transams, they're the ONLY american cars I like, I HATE camaro's save for the old ones, and Mustang's? Well they're just over-rated, and weigh too much, and no I don't like them, Ford is too much of a liability when it comes to reliability. And all I gotta say is, that is the SMARTEST reply I have ever seen ANYONE give! KUDOS!! I stand corrected, and forfeit my previous remark! I was bashing the idiots though, not the cars.
NSX= very underrated car. All because of the 0-60 thing.
chuckmekere 5 months ago
Does the T/A have any mods?
Mr73360 7 months ago
for real my two fav cars, well R31s and R32s but im to poor
st3v3n98 8 months ago
The NSX is WAY overpriced for its performance. And this is a LT1 TA, so not overly impressive
Punisher7121 8 months ago 4
@Punisher7121 seriously. i bet an ls1 would be walking the nsx
onquarter 8 months ago
i feel bad
miketheman4190 11 months ago
if that's ur definition for honda racing then i guess lol.
unwantedguysss 1 year ago
Comment removed
Schnookynibbles 1 year ago
Both cars are sick and have alot if potential
widebodyhatchback96 1 year ago
don't mess with v6 haha. honda power bby!!!
unwantedguysss 1 year ago
@unwantedguysss If nismo stands for nissan motor sports, does homo stand for honda motor sports?
Ludwigdrummer616 1 year ago 10
NSX is faster than a ws6, the NSX from the factory is lighter and has almost same HP and the NSX is MR, on a highway the NSX will eat the WS-6 all day long.
FACT!
killakdc5 1 year ago
@killakdc5 only if it was an ls trans am
ls2transam 1 year ago
@ls2transam NSX runs high 12's, WS-6 runs low 13's, and from a roll its NSX.
killakdc5 1 year ago
@killakdc5 my t/a runs high elevens so i guess not against mine
ls2transam 1 year ago
@ls2transam
yea but thats your car with mods, a modded and cammed NSX runs mid 11's.
killakdc5 1 year ago
Fuck Domestics, If the Japs really wanted to build V8's V12's ect. they would and can and i bet they would be way better than any American piece of shit engine. It just a wast of time, If you really know how to design a car and engine you don't need the extra weight plus its a waste of fuel.
jh4dc5s 1 year ago
@jh4dc5s BUT WE LIKE OUR ENGINES TO BE NASTY GAS BURIN LOUD POWER HOUSES! SUMTHIN THE OTHER COUNTRYS CANT DO.
BLACKLACDTS 1 year ago
@BLACKLACDTS Look up TVR.
10072018 1 year ago
@10072018 i know what tvr is. they have a nasty v12 but not the same as our big cubic inch v8's.
BLACKLACDTS 1 year ago
@jh4dc5s Lol damn settle down. You get hit by a domestic in your younger years or something? Its going to be all right.
SkeenDogger 1 year ago
@SkeenDogger lol i wrote that after my car got stolen.
jh4dc5s 1 year ago
@jh4dc5s Oh no. Yeah that sucks well in that case id be livid too!
SkeenDogger 1 year ago
@jh4dc5s fag
OsakaBancho 1 year ago
@OsakaBancho Thanks for the comment.
jh4dc5s 1 year ago
I dont like em... They look like a Honda Accord that rear ended a vette. LOL!
JayGeePee1 2 years ago
i love my muscle but a nsx is one car id love to get my hands on ohhh so sexy
CantBeatMuscle 2 years ago
Lots of idiots posting on this video... does anyone understand that the NSX was a track car not a strip car?
SonWayward 2 years ago
@SonWayward
nah man ppl are ignorant...
TheBox67 1 year ago
Lol little adrenaline talks alot of shit. Man who cares who's better? Their both very good cars. Just grow up bro. You'll make alot less enemies.
95WhiteTransam 2 years ago
LOL 3L V-6 smokes a 6L V-8 muscle in a roll-on... pretty sad when you consider the fact that the NSX was made for superior handling, not drag racing (like the Ws6)
bliglum 2 years ago
the ws6 is a 5.7 L for one. And this is an lt1 that is inferior to the ls1 by miles. Plus the lt1 is a 2 valve per cylinder pushrod engine. The nsx is dohc 4 valve per cylinder. stfu
dylandavey 2 years ago 2
Yeah, you're right.. the lt1 is an inferior engine.
bliglum 2 years ago
@bliglum You assume the WS6 is "muscle" and built for drag racing because it has a V8. How amusing. Did you know that the NSX costed a shit load more than the WS6? And it just barely beats it. What a piece of shit.
OsakaBancho 1 year ago
@OsakaBancho Is a Trans am not a "muscle" car? And yes, I am aware of the road racing series for which it was named, but times have changed, trans am didn't. Also, I did'nt know NSX costed alot more!! I thot it was tha same price.!!! I mean, it's made of aluminum like cheap cans, and only has a V-6!! You're RIGHT! What a piece of shit!!!!!.... No, not really. What an ignorant thing to say.
bliglum 1 year ago
@bliglum I know, it's very ignorant to realize that more expensive things are better than cheaper things.
OsakaBancho 1 year ago
@OsakaBancho Yeah, you got me there. I had no idea.
bliglum 1 year ago
@bliglum If you think F-bodies can't turn you're an idiot. They dominate amateur race series.
Model192 9 months ago
@Model192 Thats because the cars they are racing have engines that are about half the size... Also, being fast on a nice smooth racetrack is pretty easy for a live axle car. However, things get unnecessarily tricky when things get uneven. Finally, don't believe everything you see on tv ; )
bliglum 9 months ago
@bliglum Which car has a live axle rear? Rofl.
Model192 9 months ago
@Model192 hmm.... so because a professional driver can handle a extremely tuned one-purpose car on a track they practice on you think any one can take there mustangs out and do what they do?....its easier handling a stock nsx like a pro than a heavily modded american track car..and thats not because american cars need more skill its because japanese cars handle better....overall they are better...less expensive,more reliable,better economy,better performance,easier to work with
KOOPA1020 7 months ago
@KOOPA1020 I think you missed the part where it says AMATEUR. You're wrong on all accounts, regardless, because I have a track car with 226,000 miles on it and my pistons tops are STILL shiny and I'm STILL getting 53 PSI oil pressure. Shut the fuck up about what you don't know.
Model192 7 months ago
@Model192 "shut the fuck up about what you don't know".... it sounds like to me like you don't know proper grammar... that is a plus and negative for you.. negative ,you sound like an uneduacated idiot.. ,positive, i won't argue with you because debates with dumb people get no where...
KOOPA1020 7 months ago
@KOOPA1020 Or you're just wrong and are falling back on the "lol you can't spell on the interwebs" insult.
Model192 6 months ago
@Model192 or maybe the correct answer is i am corrrect and don't feel i have to humilate you to prove something to an idiot... don't reply.. your late arguements are as useless as ricer fly-by's... just pointless after you've lost
KOOPA1020 6 months ago
@KOOPA1020 And at the end of the day I'm the one with the track car at 226,000 miles. Living, empirical proof for all the reasons you're wrong. Grats.
Model192 6 months ago
The WS6 was the older LT1 version. The LS1 WS6 (98-02) would easily hang with an NSX both being stock
dplej 2 years ago
Damn! What a nice NSX.
BlazinChikn23 2 years ago
please take note camera man. KEEP THE FUCKING CAMERA INSIDE. it's a simple concept even the most new to filming can achieve.
darcnytemare 2 years ago 5
@darcnytemare - She was a first time camera person, she didnt know. Sorry!
ARFNSX 2 years ago 6
I retract my previous aggression :). sorry man :thumbsup:. I didn't know. Hope to see more vids though :-D
darcnytemare 2 years ago
I correct my self they did have the WS6 in the older trans ams.
workensmart 2 years ago
I don't think that was a WS6 because it had the older front end onit. Maybe it was but that car didn't have a LS1 it had the LT1 wich was a shitty engine. But good kill NSX.
workensmart 2 years ago
forget all this bullshit bottom line is the nsx is faster
nsxracersb 2 years ago
Were they even racing?
xzaero0 2 years ago
NSX ..... poser car numero uno. LOL
merlingt1 2 years ago
poser car = over 25K? Damn expensive "poser" car
SonWayward 2 years ago
If there was no NSX there would be no McLaren F1.
kageryu311 2 years ago
and What would we do without the F1 lol
Localdrummerweb 2 years ago
Its a fact I can't state a fact. All I meant about that is that the Mclaren F1 was modeled off of the NSX. The NSX was one of the fastest things to come out in its day, The only problem with it is they never made any improvements on it. It is a fine vehicle.
kageryu311 2 years ago
I like NSX's. I miss the 90's. The NSX, the TT Supra, the Corvette ZR1. Yes, I realize they are all different classes but I'm just saying like "hey, hey. the 90's were cool:)"
sexxiadrian 2 years ago
The only thing that video told me was the nsx had more horsepower ... go from a dig and lets see all the torque from that lt1 put about 2 cars on that nsx. That is if the ws6 driver knows how to launch
eXpLoiTeD420 2 years ago
Yeah man..If that fbody has a pair of sticky tires and a set of gears forget about the nsx all together.
Nick98Z28 2 years ago
excuses.. it lost this was from a roll sticky tires.? the nsx does 4.6 0-60 the LS1 aint gionne beat that. the LS! might get inthe low 5 second range no excuses it lost to a 292 low trq car.
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
Everyone takes offense when someone's opinion on here doesn't match theirs. Why argue that hp matters but torque doesn't? That doesn't even make sense. They're both important but in lower revving cars Torque is more important cause that's the powerband the car stays in. I'm not trying to start fights with anyone. Bottom line, Fastest stock NSX runs a 13.3 in the 1/4, WS6s have run in the 12s bone stock. If you wanna pay $80,000 for a 13 second car be my guest. 175 mph isn't impressive either.
Slaby86 2 years ago
yeah my 99 camaro runs 13.07 in the 1/4 and that was a lt1 car chisel nose! ls1 kill those cars so im guessing it would be diffrent with a ls1 if its barley out running the lt1 i know my b4c car will smoke it!!! hands down
bighead29058 2 years ago
It wasnt an LS1 it was an LT1
Dhotmoney 2 years ago
trq is for american who believe trq wins races. dont gimmie no shit about weight oranything else. the S2000 has a measly 153lb of trq while a mustang GT and camaro put wellover 300LB of trq and the s2000 beats both. HP&gears win races you really need tostop believe what you hear.
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
What do you mean weight has no bearing?? A 600cc Yamaha R6 has less wheel hp & ft.lbs and rapes an S2k in every single aspect.
A S2k won't beat a Camaro in a drag race, unless the Camaro driver is absolutely horrible. An LS1 Camaro is a solid mid/low 13 second car with a decent driver, where as the S2k runs in the mid14's as well as the '99-'04 Mustang GT's with a decent driver.
inspector13jjf 2 years ago
pretty quik for an LT, nsx's are weak as fuck tho, ive never raced one that impressed me lol
jcrohm88 2 years ago
Yeah everyone knows that in stock form there really not quick if you think about it a k-swaped ek with a good tune and some minor bolt ons would walk nsx all day. There really kind of heavy and underpowered. Now you put a blower or turbo on that nsx and you got your self a hella fast car.
jdmfreak1992 2 years ago
Lt1 FTW. haha NSXs are so under powered for the price. it may have barely beat the ws6, but id rather save my money and keep my 96 ws6. :)
LT1berad 2 years ago 2
Im surprised the lt1 did that good haha. When i saw the title for the video i thought it would be a ls1. Ls1 would have eaten the nsx!
SombraWS6 2 years ago
cast iron LT1 held its own pretty decent hahaha if that were an ls1 ws.6 it would be the one getting smaller and smaller hahaha
NUNPUNCHER714 2 years ago
the nsx was lucky he wan't racing an LS1
ZR1Terror 2 years ago
was lucky? it won period. bototm line your 5.7 liter lost to a 3.2 liter. dont get mad dont hate dont do anything but all you fuckin GM bankrupt mother fuckes whine and bytch. u lost and that NSX will flip 0-60 in about 4.7 seconds. its 292 HP at 3000lb. ur shitty cars are 5.7 liters pushing what 350HP? u giot engine size more torqie and more HP there isnt a reason you shoudl of won. guess all that toriqe didnt win that race LMAO trq dont win its called HP/gears win races. fuck GM shitboxes
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
First of all you dip shit, that is an LT1 5.7 285 hp Trans Am, you fucking idiot. and it costs a fraction of what you shitty as ricer does. now, if you would of raced an LS1 Trans Am WS6, your ricer would have shit against it you fucking dumb ass get out of here with your shitty 4 and 6 cylinder cars, those are for women and kids not for men. There is nothing better than a V8 spanking on ricers and European V10 and V12. lol
ZR1Terror 2 years ago
u my moronic barbaric poor excuse for a american. lets get some facst right. 1st your gm, dodge, ford all all junk the govcernment owns gm well 60%+ your interiors are plastic parts from dollar general. dodge is terrible. your 5.7 liter pushign what 300HP 350? weak sauce. imports get 330 HP out of 3.7 liters. the bototm line is this a ricer 3.2 stock 2 liter smoked your car. get over you lost. and son, dont talk shit to me cuz face to face u would shake my hand. u aint gonna do shit.
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
you are wrong again buddy, I've seen Dodge Neons making like 550 Hp and running 10's in the quarter mile. we can make powerful four cylinder cars also, but a V8 is an American tradition you moron. pluse out V8 ZR1 is making as much hp as a V12 Lambo or Ferrari, so I don't know what you are trying to prove to me. and plastic... well I like plastic it looks nice.
ZR1Terror 2 years ago
yeah with 30lb of boost and dont gimmie no shit about oh yeah i had this neon with 550 HP and it holds up great and its reliable blahblah blah neons and srt-4 are very problematic. its a known fact i have fri\ends who have them they have shit from engine issues to losing oil, boost leak, etc.etc..etc.. while my import has no issues. and modded.
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
you know I've been shopping around for another 2002 Trans Am or a Corvette, and I haven't seen any of them with leaking parts. I've had my T/A since 2000 and it's a 1998 and I have never had any issues from the engine, transmission, axle, drive train or suspension. only problem was the waterpump seals went bad and the knock sensors and that is it. and it's still running like new with170k mile. Take that bitch! lol
ZR1Terror 2 years ago 2
Dude. I have a 98 Grand prix GTP. 200k on it runs like new, no leaks, no problems. By the way I get 30-36mpg on the highway in a heavy ass car with a boosted V6
bassbone21 2 years ago
yeah, ok LMAO gtp grand prix whats it worth a dime quarter? get the fuck out of here man. car is a POS and u and i both know it. only a fool talks shit abotu a car he cant afford. the nsx is byf ar superior then most american cars.
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
Learn to read. I didn't talk shit about any car. I'm sorry if you think my car's a piece of shit, but no, I've beaten a lot of imports. Imports that are slower and get worse gas mileage and probably won't last as long. Pull the stick out of your ass and stop being a dick.
bassbone21 2 years ago
There is a BIG difference between the "imports" you beat and a NSX.
SonWayward 2 years ago
@bassbone21
dont know much shit for pontiac but are u sayin ur GTP with 200 k is a boosted v6 thats gets 30-35mpg?
arent GTP supercharged v8's?
jDmEj7617 2 years ago
no the GTP are supercharged V6's the GXP models of Pontiacs are V8's no supercharger or turbo
7GNRSLASH7 2 years ago 2
idk when i see new pontiac GTP's is says v8
jDmEj7617 2 years ago
@jDmEj7617 FROM 06 TILL NOW THE GTP'S HAVE THE SAME 5.3 303HP AS THE IMPALA SS. BUT BEFORE THAT THEY WERE SUPERCHARGERD 3.8 V6
BLACKLACDTS 1 year ago
@jDmEj7617
No they're supercharged 3.8L. Yes, around where I live (omaha nebraska) I get about 36 on the highway. doing 80 up to colorado I got 30-33, depending on whether or not I was driving through heavy construction.
bassbone21 2 years ago
0-60 in 4.7 seconds isn't very impressive for a 292hp car weighing 3000 lbs. Mach 1 Mustangs (03-04) put down 305hp and weigh just shy of 3500 lbs and match that 0-60. NSX would be a much better contender if it didn't have pizza cutter tires and put down more than 220 lbs of torque. I would guess a stock WS6 would eat a stock NSX alive. It has over 100 more lbs of torque for the first 5200 rpms and over 50 more hp throughout the entire rpm range. Only weighs like 400 lbs more.
Slaby86 2 years ago
imagine that not very impressive but impressive enough to beat a LS1 GREAT chevy motor. the bottomline is this nsx>chevy ws6 both are cars the nsx is a great cxar the ws6 is a good car. it lost take it like a man. your talking about a 292 HP rev line of 8300 revs all this on a stock 3.2 liter. u need togive credit whendue and not only that the nsx would whoop a WS6 on a track straight lineor with turns. the ws6 is a good car but hardly the car the nsx is.
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
how did i know that nsx was going to be ahead? and guess what, if they stayed WOT, that nsx would of gotten smaller and smaller
Dickotine 2 years ago
that is just an lt1. an ls1 car would have destroyed the nsx
pinchnloaf 2 years ago
nsx is such a great car
knowledge198405 2 years ago
love that nsx
blaket327 3 years ago 6
noshabibis shut up and guys look at the hood scoops and front bumper thats an lt1
mstl314 3 years ago
you dudes are gay, that is G-A-Y.
davoe1976 3 years ago
Fact Still Remains. the Ls Series motors Have way more potential... hondas an economy car sry... Tha NSX just never took off...lol
OhioTech08 3 years ago
ur the stupidest shit to ever talk. the king of racing Carol Shelby said "Horsepower sales cars, but torque wins races"...puya go play need for speed lil douche
noshabibis 3 years ago
Lol. Ok I'd say 5.6 is pretty good. Im just happy knowing I have a nice car. So the nsx is better? ummm Are you trying to prove something because I couldnt care less. Grow up.
95WhiteTransam 3 years ago
pretty bad for a big engine thats a V8 shame that a V6 kick your V8's ass.
noshabibis 3 years ago
*5.7. And ok. What do you have?
95WhiteTransam 3 years ago
i have a 16 year old brain that knows about cars more than you.
noshabibis 3 years ago
Lol ok. Have a nice life with no car.
95WhiteTransam 3 years ago
rather have a brain then a car. :)
NSX rules.
noshabibis 3 years ago
you have a 16 year old brain that is ignorant thats all.
shawnshawn426 3 years ago
amen...
ILoveXANAXbarz 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
NSX sux cock its a chicks car
chrisroll92 3 years ago
plus the 95 nsx is better in handling and it has low maintenance and its faster.
the 95 trans am sucks in handling its heavy waste to much gas and its high on maintenance.
noshabibis 3 years ago
ahahaha people v10viper04 and 95whitetransam say that torque doesnt mean nothing in racing.
they think they know about cars when they own cheap cars.
noshabibis 3 years ago
v10viper04 is right. Torque just gets you off the line. Once you get around 40-50, Thats when you horsepower takes over.
95WhiteTransam 3 years ago
damn straight.
v10viper04 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ur the stupidest shit to ever talk. the king of racing Carol Shelby said "Horsepower sales cars, but torque wins races"...puya go play need for speed lil douche
noshabibis 3 years ago
nsx had serious mods
Aaronlt1 3 years ago
Really?
Unless you consider E/H/I serious mods, I do not know what you are talking about.
The WS6 had cams and E/LP/I.
ARFNSX 3 years ago
@ARFNSX The WS6 had "cams" though? lol
N20LT4 1 year ago
the nsx is light thats the only reason its quick
csfocus65 3 years ago
NSX aren't even fast they make mid 200 hp, bs
v10viper04 3 years ago
dumb butt the NSX on the vid has 290 stock search it up on google put 2004 NSX.
oh and for your information horsepower is not everything you forgot about Torque.
noshabibis 3 years ago
Haha i'm sure the NSX makes SO MUCH TORQUE! and also idiot torque doesn't matter any higher than about 40mph its all HP up there.
v10viper04 3 years ago
v10viper04 said TORQUE doesnt matter hes a dumbass. you dont know shit about cars you only think its about hoesepower when its to about torque, weight, handling.......
noshabibis 3 years ago
And torque really doesn't matter you fuckin jerkoff, Torque gets you going horsepower keeps you going. Look it up dumbass, thats why V8's alwasy rape imports off the line. The torque! (which imports DON'T have) Learn your facts stupid ass.
v10viper04 3 years ago
haha u r mad. thats a shame import cars like the M3 and like the NSX RAPE your mustangs with V8's!!!!!!
noshabibis 3 years ago
Do you really think i care that you talk shit about stangs? They ARE slow. Plus the NSX and M3 are how much more money? Your an idiot, learn about cars in the same price range dumbass.
v10viper04 3 years ago
ur the stupidest shit to ever talk. the king of racing Carol Shelby said "Horsepower sales cars, but torque wins races"...puya go play need for speed lil douche
noshabibis 3 years ago
theres no need to talk shit. Horsepower gets you in the top end. And go play need for speed? Lol, if you havent noticed I OWN a 95 trans am. hahah good one.
95WhiteTransam 3 years ago
This guy is right, STFU noshabibis, you don't know jack shit about cars.
v10viper04 3 years ago
ahahahaha a 95 white trans am? ahahaha it goes in 0-60 in 5.6 seconds and it has a V8 and 5.7 liters!!!! thats sucks ass!!!
a 95 NSX it goes in 0-60 in 5.2 and its a V6 and has 3 liters (almost half of your shitty trans-am)
noshabibis 3 years ago
that wasn't even a ls1 trans am that was an lt1 and im surprised it kept up. love f-bodys
gc302047 3 years ago
the nsx is a fast car and so is the ws6. but lets face it. nobody was ever inspired to build what used to be the world's fastest production car because of a ws6. the mclaren F1 was the car inspired by the nsx. if you honda haters knew anything about the nsx other than what you read in magazines then you'd bow down. remember that next time you see an nsx. and just look the other way cause you are not worthy.
eludethis 3 years ago 3
Ricer elitest. I highly doubt that the McLaren was inspired by the NSX. If you can't read it in a magazine where did you learn it?
hjjfffaa 3 years ago
haha you suck at life. that is all. my info comes straight from the man's mouth himself. gordan murray the creator of the f1. why don't you just put your hand down. cause schools in session...honda style!!!
eludethis 3 years ago
honda's are a joke besides the k20. and the nsx is way over priced and a corvette wanna be
mlite2go 3 years ago
eludethis thats exactly what im talking about!!! some people even argue that the NSX is the best sports car ever made. NSX rule!!!
noshabibis 3 years ago
any nsx will beat a gm product
jacked080 3 years ago
you must either be stupid or ignorant..or both..
the NSX costs 90K and has 270hp, 210 lbs of torque.
the new Z06 cost 70k has 505 hp and 400+lbs of torque
NSX 0-60 time is 5.8 seconds, 1/4 high 13s low 14s
Z06 0-60 time is 3.7 seconds, 1/4 11.7s
Firebird ws6/ camaro SS 0-60 is 5.2 seconds, 1/4 mid low 13s
look it up yourself
Ev0Vii 3 years ago
nsx's do NOT cost 90k!!!!
a guy came to my shop that had one, and he bought his for 35k!
and that was 5 years ago...
RubberDuckieXcore 3 years ago
Im talking about new.. they cost 90K new.. my friend got one for 25K a while back but it was used.
the MSRP on all the NSX's were 89,000
google "NSX MSRP"
Ev0Vii 3 years ago
yup, cept some people can make it 5.0 for the ls1. I know mine did that stock.
PeteDragoon 3 years ago
you are retarded... my trans am eats nsx's for dessert! heads and cam!
nathanblakeslee 3 years ago
mystang 115 haha u and ur v6 stang will never come close to beating an nsx.. u almost beat him? lol lol lol lol as in he pulled 8 10 cars on u... that s not almost buddy.. wake up lil guy
joelopes23 3 years ago
you didn't almsot beat one in your V6 shitty Mustang. The NSX can do 12.9 in the 1.4 stock with the 3.2 manual
MaddDogg81 3 years ago
How did that NSX win?? Is it modded?? I almost beat one in my V6 stang! I thought this WS6 would walk that overpriced(but kickass and gorgeous) Acura. All nice cars tho!
mystang115 3 years ago
I think you need to research the NSX a little more. If you look here on Youtube, you will see the NSX beating many different mustangs, 5.0 and MACHs. The NSX might not be as slow as you think ;-)
ARFNSX 3 years ago
that NSX u "raced" must have been messing with u lol.
xJayFitz 3 years ago
ummmm lol you deff wouldnt almost beat one in a v6 stang nsx are now joke there light as hell all carbo fiber hahaha v6 stang u guys will say u beat anything the other day i beat a bugatti it was crazy dude
bigradke17 3 years ago
i watched a hyundai tiburon beat a v6 mustang. it was a first gen tiburon too. that nsx must have only had two working cylinders or something.
incubusmv66 3 years ago
No, that was a stock NSX running as good as it can. What are you talking about?
fasthonda 3 years ago 3
I traveled here through many Prelude videos, which led me to the NSX pages, I see countless comments about american cars and how great they are, but when it comes to the video where the other side wins, these clowns don't say anything.
I see that the neanderthawl rednecks defend breathlessly the american car, but have no idea that Ford, GM, and Chrysler are more foreign than Toyota, and Honda, and even a shitty Hyundai!
htownh22lude 3 years ago
not all of us are rednecks. i for one know that me and a vast majority of other ls1 owners understand that power is power no matter what its in. the only difference is the potential of power and price. the ultimate goal for an nsx (road track) for example would be much different than the goal of a muscle car owner(straight line). anything can go fast, quit bashin it just because of where its from.
tcamaro7 3 years ago 3
this is true, I for one do not DISlike transams, they're the ONLY american cars I like, I HATE camaro's save for the old ones, and Mustang's? Well they're just over-rated, and weigh too much, and no I don't like them, Ford is too much of a liability when it comes to reliability. And all I gotta say is, that is the SMARTEST reply I have ever seen ANYONE give! KUDOS!! I stand corrected, and forfeit my previous remark! I was bashing the idiots though, not the cars.
htownh22lude 3 years ago
Nice, get those three on a track and see what the outcome would be like then.
tuor1984 4 years ago