I hate to to say it but RP will more than not be eliminated by the back shadow of creatures as these b/c of the division that was created some MANY decades ago... HE IS THE ULTIMATE CANDIDATE!!! (FOR AMERICA)
Hippie... Obviously he believes everything he sees in loosely edited videos from crap root corporately funded video internet "providers".... HAVE A MIND FOLKS!
the only real argument against Ron Paul that I can see in anyway are either progressives, who support subsides for everything and don't care about the consequences like inflation, stagnation from high taxes, etc. Also Neocons who can't stop supporting ongoing wars with no end and no spending cap. and lastly, those who refuse to vote, not solely because they don't think Ron Paul can win, but because he won't be the end of our worries and problems in America, and I tend to agree with them.
I will be voting for Ron Paul because I dont want the IRS nor do I dont want the Federal government to tell me how to live my life. States can regulate themselves.
That is the great thing about Ron Paul he has a belief in some thing .He doesn`t tell you a lie he tells you his opinion and he lets you have yours on the main issues he is still the Man.
Good video, I hate that fat fuck he is an Obama drone. 'Terroja' also forgets to mention that his lovely liberal fuhrer O-Bomber is anti-gay, pro-Christian, hardcore neoconservative according to Bill Kristol (famous neocon). He supports military interventionism he was given the Nobel prize & that was the worst mistake since they gave it to Kissinger. I agree with your assessment however I think you could have went further into some the main issues. Ron Paul doesn't support the police state etc.
I think Ron Paul's position on evolution is not young earth creationism. its skepticism. which is closer to the scientific position that the dogmatic position many atheist take. Before going to medical school, he got a bachelor in biology. I wonder what TheAmazingAtheist degree is in... He definitely has a BS.
@wizkid2000 true in his last book he agrees with evolution, the video which amazing atheist showed hes disagreeing with one of theories of evolution, for his opinion on evolution hes same as Al Gore evolution trough God, yes hes Christian but all candidates are so don't see the problem really
I think it is odd to even ask candidates whether or not they believe in the theory of Evolution. What does it matter? Does believing we evolved from lower animals help a president run the country? Or this is just a way to quickly dismiss someone because they believe in God, out of just plain laziness, saying, "This guy believes in God, so I don't need to know anything more about him...next."
Civil liberties are not granted by a government. You don't have rights because some group of people in another state GAVE them to you. You have them because you were born. You only forfeit them when you abuse others rights or when you don't defend them. Oh, notice you did not respond to any of my post. . . your denial must be how you sleep through the night!
Also about TJ's point about seperation of church and state, he (probably) intentionally left out the last part of the paragraph where RP talks about seperation of church and state which says "The establishment clause of the First Amendment was simply intended to forbid the creation of an official state church like the Church of England, not to drive religion out of public life." Doesn't really sound like he is against it.
1:17 - You want evidence. From the Ron Paul 2012 site:
"Dr. Paul’s experience in science and medicine only reinforced his belief that life begins at conception, and he believes it would be inconsistent for him to champion personal liberty and a free society if he didn’t also advocate respecting the God-given right to life—for those born and unborn."
Go ahead, tell me how I've 'taken this out of context' or how it doesn't qualify as smothering people with religious beliefs of others.
@Xerock What he believes and what he votes for are two mutually exclusive things. I conducted a brief survey into his voting history and so far just about everything he has signed clearly points to the fact he doesn't wants to leave things up to the federal government, instead state or local and if possible up to you.
Because that state rights thing worked so well with interracial marriages and "separate but equal" state laws in American history. You dumb libertarian fuck.
@Xerock Yes, because if we let states have rights again, obviously we'd go back to slavery and Jim Crow laws.... Fuck worrying about state elections, vote for the pres every 4 years and pretend you are making a difference.
@Xerock Big government and laws don't cure racism, you ignorant cunt muffin. State rights are the only thing that protect people from tyranny. It is the only thing that allows people the power to do something locally. If a person hates blacks, they're going to hate them whether or not your retarded ass and big government pass a law.
And yes, the system of federal control over everything has worked so fucking well. Let's continue doing the same thing over and expecting different results. Idiot.
Pfft.. same old bullshit from you libertarian dumbfucks. "Winning elections" means that the free market of ideas works, but "Losing elections" means an "oppressive mob" is limiting your "personal freedoms". Dry up and die. You Douche.
@Xerock gay marriage - banned, drugs - banned, corporatism - emraced, wars - embracred, military industrial complex - embraced, balloning debt, embraced. We are such dumfucks to support marriage equality, civil liberties, balanced budgets, peaceful interactions with other countries instead of war. Spot on brilliant Xerock!!!
The civil liberties of black people didn't come about through state laws, dumbfuck. It came about when actions against those civil liberties were criminalized by the FEDERAL MANDATE. None of those other things will change with "state laws" either.
And for all your posturing, Ron will NEVER get more than 2% of the vote. Because there aren't enough batshit idiots like you. He ranks lower than Ross Perot.
And that's the reality you'll have go to bed with every night.
@Xerock Same old bullshit, cool story. You answered jack shit, and yet again show why liberty always win, and morons who spout bull shit lose. Look at your original comment.
Enjoy being a moron. When you can actually factually address something coherently, let me know kiddo. Oh noes, Libertarians are so bad. Protecting liberty of all people, not groping rights in accordance to class and creating racism via collectivist mentality
This country has followed people like you. We're doing well, eh
@xKenseixX SOmeone who gropes peoples rights is not libertarian. Someone who fights at the drop of a hat is not a pacifist. Libertarian means something. It means socially tolerant and fiscally responsible. You STILL have not addressed Ron Paul's attack on corporations. THe ones you claim are Libertarian. If this country followed Libertarians we would not need Ron Paul.
@ballarditecheese Who the hell are you and what are you blabbering on about? What rights are being stripped? What attack on corporations? The corporatism intertwined with government that any sane person can see?
Instead of retarded analogies, try to bring up something specific. Show one thing Paul voted on or introduced that was ever anti-liberty or against businesses.
Take a deep breath, grow the fuck up, and actually learn someones position. It takes more than 30 second sound clips kiddo.
@xKenseixX Wait, since when does it matter who of these speakers are? Are you saying the weight of what is said varies on the one saying it? Yes, the corporatism intertwined with government is what Ron Paul is attacking. You obviously have not watched this video or anything that Ron Paul has said because he oppose the corporate abuse and his voting record reflects that.
Paul NEVER introduced anything that was anti-liberty, so there are no examples of that. Why are you discounting him.
@ballarditecheese Again, what are you talking about? When did I ever state the weight of what is said varies on the one saying it? The only relevance I see that applying to is when the NeoCon canidates start talking about the federal reserve. Suddenly, they change their policies to meet what the people now support... convenient And only there, would the weight of what is being said, be in any difference.
Next, you have me confused with someone else. I'm pro-Ron Paul, what are you going on about
@ballarditecheese You should be replying to the person I was replying to, not me. Apparently your original comment towards me was in a direction totally different than what I thought, since you've confused me with Xerock.
@Xerock He does not support a federal ban on abortion. He has made this clear. Where is the smothering people? He wants states to decide, and this video says that indivduals should decide. Are you going to address the rest of the video about the weight of the benefit from an RP presidency far outweighs the downside.Sorry I did not swear, hope that's okay.
No, none other should impose their ideal upon others. Simply, to me, that would be fascism. Imo, we should respect the fact that Dr. Ron Paul respects us enough to tell us his opinions; while defending our right to opinions.
I hate to to say it but RP will more than not be eliminated by the back shadow of creatures as these b/c of the division that was created some MANY decades ago... HE IS THE ULTIMATE CANDIDATE!!! (FOR AMERICA)
nviso209 2 months ago
Hippie... Obviously he believes everything he sees in loosely edited videos from crap root corporately funded video internet "providers".... HAVE A MIND FOLKS!
nviso209 2 months ago
by the way great video
sinisamicic1983 2 months ago
I'm an atheist that supports gay marriage and abortion and Ron Paul is by far the best candidate for president in my opinion.
Amazing Atheist isn't very bright.
ComicPenius 4 months ago 3
the only real argument against Ron Paul that I can see in anyway are either progressives, who support subsides for everything and don't care about the consequences like inflation, stagnation from high taxes, etc. Also Neocons who can't stop supporting ongoing wars with no end and no spending cap. and lastly, those who refuse to vote, not solely because they don't think Ron Paul can win, but because he won't be the end of our worries and problems in America, and I tend to agree with them.
sil3ntxOblivion 5 months ago
This is probably one of the best responses to AA's video and probably one of the best responses to Ron Critiques I've heard in general
AwesomeMullet69 5 months ago
Please go and post this as a video response to jaklu4 video on Ron Paul.
tstatech 5 months ago
Get used to big government. It's here to stay. We will be Europe in 10 years.
Andreas748 5 months ago
I will be voting for Ron Paul because I dont want the IRS nor do I dont want the Federal government to tell me how to live my life. States can regulate themselves.
aaronandnicole 6 months ago
That is the great thing about Ron Paul he has a belief in some thing .He doesn`t tell you a lie he tells you his opinion and he lets you have yours on the main issues he is still the Man.
kjp68 6 months ago
Good video, I hate that fat fuck he is an Obama drone. 'Terroja' also forgets to mention that his lovely liberal fuhrer O-Bomber is anti-gay, pro-Christian, hardcore neoconservative according to Bill Kristol (famous neocon). He supports military interventionism he was given the Nobel prize & that was the worst mistake since they gave it to Kissinger. I agree with your assessment however I think you could have went further into some the main issues. Ron Paul doesn't support the police state etc.
MadXMax187 6 months ago
Awesome Video!
I think Ron Paul's position on evolution is not young earth creationism. its skepticism. which is closer to the scientific position that the dogmatic position many atheist take. Before going to medical school, he got a bachelor in biology. I wonder what TheAmazingAtheist degree is in... He definitely has a BS.
wizkid2000 6 months ago 7
@wizkid2000 true in his last book he agrees with evolution, the video which amazing atheist showed hes disagreeing with one of theories of evolution, for his opinion on evolution hes same as Al Gore evolution trough God, yes hes Christian but all candidates are so don't see the problem really
sinisamicic1983 2 months ago
Great Video! I think you make so much sense! I hope TJ watches this..
DonSolo52 6 months ago
awesome video! you said it right on the spot!
iNNoCeNttDReAMs 6 months ago
Freedom from government. Bring the power to the states then to the county then to the city then the homes.
idahoman325 6 months ago
Ron paul makes a whole lot of sense to me... especially compared to the rest of the idiots running
aucaleb2 6 months ago
I say who cares on his views about abortion! If someone decides not to vote for Ron Paul solely on abortion is a moron.
Tr0llinator 6 months ago 7
I think it is odd to even ask candidates whether or not they believe in the theory of Evolution. What does it matter? Does believing we evolved from lower animals help a president run the country? Or this is just a way to quickly dismiss someone because they believe in God, out of just plain laziness, saying, "This guy believes in God, so I don't need to know anything more about him...next."
sablechicken 6 months ago
Oh sorry, you did mention civil liberties, but missed that RP wants to protect them.
ballarditecheese 6 months ago
Civil liberties are not granted by a government. You don't have rights because some group of people in another state GAVE them to you. You have them because you were born. You only forfeit them when you abuse others rights or when you don't defend them. Oh, notice you did not respond to any of my post. . . your denial must be how you sleep through the night!
ballarditecheese 6 months ago
Also about TJ's point about seperation of church and state, he (probably) intentionally left out the last part of the paragraph where RP talks about seperation of church and state which says "The establishment clause of the First Amendment was simply intended to forbid the creation of an official state church like the Church of England, not to drive religion out of public life." Doesn't really sound like he is against it.
philateliceun 6 months ago
1:17 - You want evidence. From the Ron Paul 2012 site:
"Dr. Paul’s experience in science and medicine only reinforced his belief that life begins at conception, and he believes it would be inconsistent for him to champion personal liberty and a free society if he didn’t also advocate respecting the God-given right to life—for those born and unborn."
Go ahead, tell me how I've 'taken this out of context' or how it doesn't qualify as smothering people with religious beliefs of others.
Xerock 6 months ago
@Xerock What he believes and what he votes for are two mutually exclusive things. I conducted a brief survey into his voting history and so far just about everything he has signed clearly points to the fact he doesn't wants to leave things up to the federal government, instead state or local and if possible up to you.
skyler114 6 months ago
@skyler114
Because that state rights thing worked so well with interracial marriages and "separate but equal" state laws in American history. You dumb libertarian fuck.
Xerock 6 months ago
@Xerock Yes, because if we let states have rights again, obviously we'd go back to slavery and Jim Crow laws.... Fuck worrying about state elections, vote for the pres every 4 years and pretend you are making a difference.
MagnificentSeanT 6 months ago
@Xerock Big government and laws don't cure racism, you ignorant cunt muffin. State rights are the only thing that protect people from tyranny. It is the only thing that allows people the power to do something locally. If a person hates blacks, they're going to hate them whether or not your retarded ass and big government pass a law.
And yes, the system of federal control over everything has worked so fucking well. Let's continue doing the same thing over and expecting different results. Idiot.
xKenseixX 6 months ago
@xKenseixX
Pfft.. same old bullshit from you libertarian dumbfucks. "Winning elections" means that the free market of ideas works, but "Losing elections" means an "oppressive mob" is limiting your "personal freedoms". Dry up and die. You Douche.
Xerock 6 months ago
@Xerock gay marriage - banned, drugs - banned, corporatism - emraced, wars - embracred, military industrial complex - embraced, balloning debt, embraced. We are such dumfucks to support marriage equality, civil liberties, balanced budgets, peaceful interactions with other countries instead of war. Spot on brilliant Xerock!!!
ballarditecheese 6 months ago
The civil liberties of black people didn't come about through state laws, dumbfuck. It came about when actions against those civil liberties were criminalized by the FEDERAL MANDATE. None of those other things will change with "state laws" either.
And for all your posturing, Ron will NEVER get more than 2% of the vote. Because there aren't enough batshit idiots like you. He ranks lower than Ross Perot.
And that's the reality you'll have go to bed with every night.
Xerock 6 months ago
@Xerock Same old bullshit, cool story. You answered jack shit, and yet again show why liberty always win, and morons who spout bull shit lose. Look at your original comment.
Enjoy being a moron. When you can actually factually address something coherently, let me know kiddo. Oh noes, Libertarians are so bad. Protecting liberty of all people, not groping rights in accordance to class and creating racism via collectivist mentality
This country has followed people like you. We're doing well, eh
xKenseixX 6 months ago
@xKenseixX SOmeone who gropes peoples rights is not libertarian. Someone who fights at the drop of a hat is not a pacifist. Libertarian means something. It means socially tolerant and fiscally responsible. You STILL have not addressed Ron Paul's attack on corporations. THe ones you claim are Libertarian. If this country followed Libertarians we would not need Ron Paul.
ballarditecheese 6 months ago
@ballarditecheese Who the hell are you and what are you blabbering on about? What rights are being stripped? What attack on corporations? The corporatism intertwined with government that any sane person can see?
Instead of retarded analogies, try to bring up something specific. Show one thing Paul voted on or introduced that was ever anti-liberty or against businesses.
Take a deep breath, grow the fuck up, and actually learn someones position. It takes more than 30 second sound clips kiddo.
xKenseixX 6 months ago
@xKenseixX Wait, since when does it matter who of these speakers are? Are you saying the weight of what is said varies on the one saying it? Yes, the corporatism intertwined with government is what Ron Paul is attacking. You obviously have not watched this video or anything that Ron Paul has said because he oppose the corporate abuse and his voting record reflects that.
Paul NEVER introduced anything that was anti-liberty, so there are no examples of that. Why are you discounting him.
ballarditecheese 6 months ago
@ballarditecheese Again, what are you talking about? When did I ever state the weight of what is said varies on the one saying it? The only relevance I see that applying to is when the NeoCon canidates start talking about the federal reserve. Suddenly, they change their policies to meet what the people now support... convenient And only there, would the weight of what is being said, be in any difference.
Next, you have me confused with someone else. I'm pro-Ron Paul, what are you going on about
xKenseixX 6 months ago
@ballarditecheese You should be replying to the person I was replying to, not me. Apparently your original comment towards me was in a direction totally different than what I thought, since you've confused me with Xerock.
xKenseixX 6 months ago
@Xerock He does not support a federal ban on abortion. He has made this clear. Where is the smothering people? He wants states to decide, and this video says that indivduals should decide. Are you going to address the rest of the video about the weight of the benefit from an RP presidency far outweighs the downside.Sorry I did not swear, hope that's okay.
ballarditecheese 6 months ago
@ballarditecheese
Congratulations, you're proud Ron Paul is a hypocrite.
Xerock 6 months ago
@Xerock
moron, find a dictionary and look up the difference between "advocate" and "legislate".
wizkid2000 6 months ago
No, none other should impose their ideal upon others. Simply, to me, that would be fascism. Imo, we should respect the fact that Dr. Ron Paul respects us enough to tell us his opinions; while defending our right to opinions.
Let us get active; Dr. Ron Paul 2012!!
ch2iss 6 months ago