4/4 is called "common time," however, the big "C" is NOT a letter. It's a half-circle, which is a symbol. It doesn't even refer to the fact that 4/4 is common, but that it is not perfect time - in fact it can also be correctly called "imperfect time."
This terminology has historical precedence and is derived from 14th century music. During this time; 3/4, represented by a circle, was referred to as "perfect time." Groups of threes perfect.... trinity... the church and music... You get the idea.
This is a nice basic video for anyone starting off, but he fails to focus closely enough on the "ictus". Thankfully, he is employing it, but he needs to make it clear that conducting does not involve merely moving your hand "Down, right, left", etc. The purpose of the "ictus", i.e. bouncing back from the beat, is to make the beat very clear – it makes it clear where the bottom of the conducting frame is. I highly recommend a book which is now out of print called the Complete Conductor.
@onfiremusicman I would recommend "Vertical Plane Focal Point Conducting" by Atherton, also out of print. This concept utilizes more of the wrist and enables you to give a clearer ictus on the up beat as well as the down beat. Very economical approach.
@chackyjazz You mean people should know what their talking about before posting a video series about conducting on YouTube! But history and theory are so boring, I don't want to study...
Doesn't it depend on the tempo of the piece? If it's a fast tempo you use "2/4" thing, if it's a slow tempo you use the "1,2,3,4,5,6" to keep the tempo better, isn't it like this?
I'm not a conductor or anything similar (even if i hope I'll be a conductor/composer myself) but subdividing tempo like that sounded to me pretty reasonable.
Anyway i don't like that much those videos, this guy isn't a great orator...
@JohnThePetru Yes, it does depend on the tempo, but it is far more common for 6/8 to be played fairly fast, and therefore the most common way to conduct it is in two.
4/4 is called "common time," however, the big "C" is NOT a letter. It's a half-circle, which is a symbol. It doesn't even refer to the fact that 4/4 is common, but that it is not perfect time - in fact it can also be correctly called "imperfect time."
This terminology has historical precedence and is derived from 14th century music. During this time; 3/4, represented by a circle, was referred to as "perfect time." Groups of threes perfect.... trinity... the church and music... You get the idea.
kenalebla 9 months ago
where can i find true conducting tutorials ?
Kliwadenko 10 months ago
This is a nice basic video for anyone starting off, but he fails to focus closely enough on the "ictus". Thankfully, he is employing it, but he needs to make it clear that conducting does not involve merely moving your hand "Down, right, left", etc. The purpose of the "ictus", i.e. bouncing back from the beat, is to make the beat very clear – it makes it clear where the bottom of the conducting frame is. I highly recommend a book which is now out of print called the Complete Conductor.
onfiremusicman 1 year ago
@onfiremusicman I would recommend "Vertical Plane Focal Point Conducting" by Atherton, also out of print. This concept utilizes more of the wrist and enables you to give a clearer ictus on the up beat as well as the down beat. Very economical approach.
karnak472 9 months ago
@karnak472 Many thanks, I'll make sure to check it out.
onfiremusicman 9 months ago
The "C" used for 4/4 is not for "common time"..... you need a little more of history, dont you think so??
chackyjazz 1 year ago
@chackyjazz yes it is
kranxta 1 year ago
Comment removed
kenalebla 9 months ago
@chackyjazz You mean people should know what their talking about before posting a video series about conducting on YouTube! But history and theory are so boring, I don't want to study...
kenalebla 9 months ago
Thanks. I've always wanted to conduct an orchestra but never knew what the top number in a 4/4 time signature meant. Carnegie Hall, here I come!
atpal 2 years ago
I dunno, I found it helpful...
makthnife 2 years ago
I am sorry, but your ellbow is way to high ... Looks not too elegant ...
christophspengler 2 years ago
Learning people? They teach, the don't "learn" people.
toptierproduction 2 years ago 2
this helps alot!
khmerviolinist 3 years ago
i think he conducts his 6/8 like a 6/4....6/8 should be conducted like a 2/4, but subdivided into triplets.
MilknCookies414 3 years ago 2
Doesn't it depend on the tempo of the piece? If it's a fast tempo you use "2/4" thing, if it's a slow tempo you use the "1,2,3,4,5,6" to keep the tempo better, isn't it like this?
JohnThePetru 2 years ago
hmmm that may be true
MilknCookies414 2 years ago
I'm not a conductor or anything similar (even if i hope I'll be a conductor/composer myself) but subdividing tempo like that sounded to me pretty reasonable.
Anyway i don't like that much those videos, this guy isn't a great orator...
JohnThePetru 2 years ago
@JohnThePetru Yes, it does depend on the tempo, but it is far more common for 6/8 to be played fairly fast, and therefore the most common way to conduct it is in two.
LOTRzagorath 1 year ago
@MilknCookies414 There are different possibilities.
My conductor sometimes does your version you mention above but you can also do it like he does. There are even more possibilities...
sjoerdvdongen 1 year ago
@MilknCookies414 it depends on the tempo of the piece. .
if the tempo is fast, it is appropriate to use the 2/4 pattern but if the tempo is slow, better to use the original in 6 pattern.
iohannesjavier 1 year ago