uDaMaGeD? LOOK AGAIN. Note the SHADOWS before the head shot & AFTER the head $hot; it's not normal. Also, this 'version' dose not have the motorcade when it turns on to ELM, when there's a 'break' in the filming. 'They' $tarted $hooting when the limo turned on to Elm. Note the 'family' thats calmly standing in foreground while Jackie is already climbing on the back, & others around them are diving for cover. The guy diving to the grounds shadow is DIFFERENT than those standing nearby.
How was standing to the left of Mary Morman, he has a movie camera rolling, where is that film, also all the other filim that day, beverey oliver's film, the Z flim is faked to show, like only 3 shots were fired, yet the GC 000, was hit a least 7 times including the person's inside, unless the guilty can be brought to justice and the laws in dallas alow that the family members of the guilty can pay for the crime, then it's all a waste of time.
@7071t6 That was a Mr. Nix and his film has been shown and it is on here. But Beverly Oliver was filming too, she was to the right of Mary Moorman, FBI came and took her film and it hasn't been seen since.
0:50 holy shit guys..william cooper was right..is it me or do you guys clearly see the driver turn around and pull out a gun when kennedy is shot? Look closely at the driver..WTF
@Godcaly123 No he does look back but trust me, he does not have a gun, it is a reflection of sunlight on Kellerman's head. It had me fooled at first too. Don't buy into that theory, it is bogus.
watch this! search on youtube this --------> Zapruder Film with Dictabelt Recording 2 - YouTube.flv" i didnt believe the limo driver but maybe this can change your mind
nah i think the undamaged part still belongs 2 either the FBI, CIA, the Lyndon Johnson family Estate, the Pentagon, the MOB, or maybe Castro had it framed and put on his loungeroom wall...lol
so how do you explain the Associated Press releasing a patsy bio of Oswald minutes after he's arrested in a theatre? Who paid these so called French Mafia in heroin to kill JFK?
@LarryCarterCenter back when american justice with bill curtis first came out and it and other news agencies wasnt controlled by the 6 corps. (disney , GE , CBS , viacom and 2 others ) they did a show on this. . . they never did find out where the contract came from but in my opinion it was the world banks , the BIG money look at history , whoever prints debt free money gets killed or almost in jacksons case . . i have never seen this show since then and ive researched other sources
@LarryCarterCenter Either HL Hunt or Clint Murchison or both. Also George HW Bush big CIA at that time, probably had some role in it. CIA is one of biggest drug dealers in the world, has been since the 60s. Google Iran Contra
@LarryCarterCenter the french mafia supplied the heroin to its shooters , research it and let me know what u find , and from what i,ve researched whoever is really in power( the world banks , rothchilds ect ) has people in key positions throughout the military industrial complex look i dont want to get into a big debate with you if you dont believe what i do thats fine i respect that ok?
The truth . . . . The italian maffia turned down the contract on JFK and the french maffia accepted it there were 4 shooters who were all paid with pounds of heroin whoever the contract came from had people in the texas state police the CIA and the military among other agencies . . . listen im tired of hearing from nonbelievers do your damn homework the truth is out there you just gotta find i
@songcollector07 Thank you I feel the same way. Have been researching since 1992. I didn't know about the Italian Mafia turning down contract though. Thanks for that. You know about more than one Oswald right?
@TakeBackAmerica2012 i have heard something but share whith me what you know please . . . and i heard the italian mafia turned the contract down on american justice , also it was never said where the contract came from , the high profile reporter that did the piece handed his research over to the FBI and nothing ever happened after that i've only seen this episode once back in the late 90's /early 2000's now they just show murder and drug stories
@songcollector07 The book, Harvey and Lee by John Armstrong. I don't have it anymore but you may be able to get a copy on the internet. You will be convinced but really if you look at all the photos of him, the ones from Dallas and the ones from Russian clearly show two different men. I will send you a link I have on my hard drive to your message box. Also, have you heard of Robert Morningstar's research on J.D. Tippit??? It will knock your socks off.
I DONT NEED YOUR PERMISSION TO SPEAK FOR EVERYONE DOLTBOY. NOT ARROGANT CERTAIN YOU ARROGANT DOLT. WILLIAM COOPER WAS FAR BEYOND YOUR PETTY IDIOCIES SON YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT HE COULD OR COULD NOT HAVE SEEN. YOU ALSO DO NOT KNOW THE LAW ENFORCEMENT PEOPLE I KNOW AND WHO HAVE REVEALED TONS TO ME AND ITS ALL TRUE DOLT BOYS. NOW GET YER TERLET PAPER AND LETS BEND OVER SO YOU CAN GET THAT CHIT OUTA YOUR ACE CRACK AND EARS OK ONE TWO THREE WIPE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FUNKDOLT BALLLONEY thats all i have to say BULLONEY. YOUR AS UNOBSERVANT AS THE FLEAS ON YOUR CROTCH! LMAO. WHAT A BUNCH OF DOLTS. You balless twiddly dees cannot venture beyond whats OK to believe you sheeple politician terd eating twits! WILLIAM GREER SHOT KENNEDY WHETHER YOU BELIEVE IT OR NOT I DONT SPEAK TO ARGUE WITH DOLTS I AM HERE TO SPEAK THE TRUTH AND BE A VOICE FOR IT IN A FORUM OF DOLTNESS AND STUPIDITY. WAKE UP DOLTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
oswald did and it was impossible NOW HEAR THIS YOU ACEWIPES you werent even crapping diapers when this happened and i dont care how damned blind you are or how stupid NONE OF YOUR SILLY CRAP LACKING OF INTELLIGENCE COMMENTS OR YOUR BLIND OBSERVATIONS MATTER THERE IS NOTHING IN THE WORLD YOU CAN DO OR SAY THAT WILL MAKE YOUR SILLY STORY VALID TO YOU YES YOU DOLTS ARE AFRAID TO SEE THE LIES YOUR TESTICULARLY CHALLENGED THATS APPARENT BUT DONT THINK BECAUSE YOU SPEW SOME SENSLESS BALONEY it matters
no one needs to stop SQUAT you dolts dont know your buttholes from your nose. BALONEY the film you dolts see is the one they want you to see dolt boys you havent heard the confession? WHat a bunch of twiddly dees. no the film doesnt prove jack because its not the right one. Thousands have seen the real untouched zapruder film but not you dolts. an jesse ventura a navy seal and qualified sniper for the military took the very same rifle and tried to fire off three shots in the time they say
You need to stop this conspiracy theory nonsense. No genuine evidence of any other weapons or shooters or shots. All genuine evidrnce shows without a doubt thst Owald acting alone shot JFK.
The film proves no shot fron the front. The film proves the wounding shot and tbe killing shot came from behind. Recreations prove all wounds could only be caused by Oswalds rifle from the Schoolbook Depository.
HEY FUNKTWIDDLYDEE we dont give a damn if you comment your ignorant remarks arent needed COOPER WAS A YALE GRAD AND NONE OF YOUR SILLY CRAP MEANS SQUAT dolt. They shot him with poison to be sure he would die in case the shot didnt kill him you stupid retard. I cant help it if your silly made up logic doesnt jive with what happened DOLT@! william greer shot kennedy right there in the car just like william cooper said he did. And the damned film was edited and retouched.
@aacrowley897 Who are YOU to speak on behalf of everyone that looks at these comments. You arrogant prick. Look at the head wound, - explosive bullet. NO toxin needed. Cooper also claimed to have access to documents that he could never have been able to see at his level of rank. Greer DID not kill JFK. The so called gun is the shine of the slicked down hair of the agent next to him and the 'recoil' is that agent lurching forward as the limo almost slows to a halt
9 is a false quote LBJ had no knowledge of when the assassination attempt was going to be. Ed Clark wanted it that way so that goes out the door and i cant see his 10th point. To answer your previous question about to "junior" he is and always will be known as that. Clark wanted his identity kept secret. Only LBJ, Clark, and Mac Wallace knew who he truly was.
@mrbouff4855 LBJ DID have prior knowledge. The statement from his former mistress clearly indicates that the night before, he knew it was going to be the next day in Dallas. The video of the interview with her is on Youtube. Either you believe her or you don't. I have no reason to disbelieve her.
I wasn't going to comment on this again but @funkmasterjee is killing me...The Zapruder film was never edited only refined for clarity. Do I believe their is a conspiracy yea but funks 1-10 points are absurd. I'm not even going to touch on 3-6 because they are almost irrelevant. 1 is true 2 i honestly dont know 7 is false 2 eye witnesses saw oswald light up tippet and then run 8 is untrue because the film wasnt edited.... cont
@mrbouff4855 I think it's pretty obvious that the Zapruder film was tampered with. There are film experts who have said so. There are just too many suspicious things involving the film. Why was it hidden from the public for so many years? Why was it originally published backwards? Why did Dan Rather misdescribe it to the public and then have to admit later he was wrong?
@mrbouff4855 There are film anomalies that just do NOT occur with any camera, camera malfunction or not. I have been over these already in detail. . Point 6 is HIGHLY relevant, Point 7: Bullet grooves are like fingerprints. They couldn't be matched. It would be thrown out of court. Point 7: there are also witnesses to the Tippet shooting who gave descriptions that contradict Oswald's appearance (height, clothing etc) Point 8: Yes the film WAS edited (ref. earlier details)
@mrbouff4855 All in all, if Oswald were tried on ALL the evidence we have today he would almost certainly be acquitted. There were multiple witnesses from the street to a second person on the 6th floor. Once you accept that, you have to accept there WAS a conspiracy
Anybody care to comment on Oswald's taking a "Getaway Bus" that was headed right back to the scene of the crime of the century? Hah! Or then giving up the cab to a lady after the bus was stalled in traffic? This is The Warren Commission's story? Really? Or that the entire police department and assistant DA dropped everything concerning a presidential assassination to descend upon a movie theater to capture a patron who was reported to have NOT paid his 25 cent admission fee? Really? Wake Up!
@glendonj "Or that the entire police department and assistant DA dropped everything concerning a presidential assassination to descend upon a movie theater to capture a patron who was reported to have NOT paid his 25 cent admission fee" - precisely. They knew Oswald was a missing employee, but so what? How would they know he was hiding in a movie theatre? Not paying a 25 cent admission fee?...they would probably expect the staff to remove him and might not even send one cop. Ridiculous
@59Fiftyrox -_-. When in the film does the driver turn around and point a pistol at kennedy or conally? besides, the wounds they recieved isn't consistant with that of a pistol that the driver may or may not've concealed. The rounds that damaged Kennedy and conally came from an upward trajectory, and from behind, most importantly. The bullets used were 6.5 millimeter steel core centerfire rifle rounds, Which could not've been fired from a pistol, as a pistol could not house this sort of round.
@ninjax261 The round that hit Conally most certainly did NOT come from an upward trajectory. That's BS. The round went through a rib and then his wrist and ended up in his thigh. That's a DOWNWARD trajectory.
Proof that the Zapruder film has been deliberately altered (and of CONSPIRACY) -
Take a look at the lamp post at 0:41 to 0:45. Does it look a little odd? Like it's been cut out or something ? That's because the part of the film has been cut out and re-timed to create the impression that the limo kept going and didn't virtually stop. It was done also to hide TWO almost simultaneous head shots. Almost simultaneous means Oswald could NOT have acted alone - hence CONSPIRACY PROVEN.
There are other anomalies like shadows of observers becoming sharp and then soft again and an anomaly where a man appears to move his legs from close together to standing legs slightly apart in less than one frame (1/18th of a second) - evidence of frame removal
@funkmasterjee Lies. WHO THE FUCK would say two people shot Kennedy and all this other shit oh and i bet you think that9/11 was an inside job . Go tell your BULLSHIT lies and theorys elsewhere dumbass
@TheAmazemanjr1 Wooohoo! looks like I struck a raw nerve with YOU. :oD It's reassuring to get confirmation from obvious disinfo shills like yourself that I am very close to the truth. True to form you use aggression, ridicule and insult as a substitute for rational argument. Classic behaviour. Thank you for your confirmation.
@funkmasterjee . How the hell would you know what happened back in 1963. YOU are the one misinformed.what you are saying is like saying the Titanic never sank or Steve Jobs or Michael Jackson never died. Get your damn facts straight
@funkmasterjee How do you know what they hid, then? were you there? did you see the original? So, instead of sitting at your computer theorizing about soemthing you know nothing about, go read the fucking warren commission, or get a firsthand account. Your claim is nothing but assumption, and assertion, without any evidence. Sorry, you're not as smart as you'd like to think you are.
@funkmasterjee I've seen the anomalies. Just because there's an anomaly doesn't mean there is a conspiracy. Besides, even if there was a conspiracy, and the footage was tampered with, which is very unlikely, as cameras from then are known to skip frames, there is not enough evidence-- scratch that, there is NO evidence to conclude a conspiracy. You cant make an assertion like that based solely on assumption, and a malfunctioning camera.
@ninjax261 There are certain anomalies that cannot be put down to camera malfunction. The only explanation for those is tampering, i.e editing. Once you accept that evidence has been edited in ANY way you have to ask yourself WHAT is being hidden, and WHY?
You are entitled to believe that the film has not been tampered with. That's your right, but I think you're kidding yourself. I make assertions based on what my own two eyes see, not assumption.
@ninjax261 "How do you know what they hid, then? " - simple deduction. If you separate out a film and rescale and re-edit part of it - it's for a reason. I didn't need to be there. Examining a film in detail is hardly assumption. You seem to have swallowed the warren Report hook line and sinker. That's a massive assumption rather than using free thought.
@funkmasterjee 'simple deduction'? You can't deduce a conspiracy from a small edit in a clip, and look, i'm not saying there is or isn't a conspiracy, all I'm saying is that, This film can not, and will not provide enough evidence to say so or otherwise. Besides, it may not be an edit at all, it might be a skip in the film, which, as i said before isn't uncommon of the time, especially with 8mm film.
@ninjax261 It's not a simple as a skipped frame or two. There are shadows that go from soft to sharp and back again, evidence of a the lamp post being 'cut out' and being part of one half of a 'composite'. Search for ' JFK's revenge part 1- the Zapruder film was altered ' on Youtube for all the details
@funkmasterjee I'd like to know, who declared you omnipotent? Just because the film is altered, Oswald didn't shoot him? Just because there is a se of 'altered frames' means there's a conspiracy? who feed you your information? You can't make an assumption, or 'deduction' from a film with missing frames. I'm sorry, but it doesn't work that way. And your theory is full of holes, besides the fact that it creates more questions than it answers. It's a small, hole-riddled assumption, and nothing more
@ninjax261 Who said I was omnipotent?? ...I didn't. The fact that the film was altered means there HAS to be a conspiracy. If it happened exactly as the WC said, why tamper with the Z film ?? I grant you anything is hard to prove conclusively, but there are just too many anomalies (not just with with the Z film) to believe the findings of the WC. By the way it's not just missing frames with the Z film, there are far more anomalies
@funkmasterjee Well, look. I'm not saying that it's one way or another. I'm not saying i do or don't believe there's a conspiracy, i'm jus pointing out the holes in your theory. I mean, the film obviously has anomalies, But it may have even been tampered with by the owner, and cameras like that missing frames isn't uncommon. Maybe he had faulty film to begin with? I'm not saying your theory isn't viable, im just saying its... holey. And it certainly creates more questions than it answers.
@funkmasterjee Besides; what you're implying is that someone deliberately edited the film, and if that's even true, it still creates more unanswered questions, such as who edited it? who had their hand on the film that could've edited it? Your 'deduction' is nothing but an assumption based off of a skipped frame or two.
I had never actually taken the time to watch this famous film before, but the part at 0:53 where the shot hits and Kennedy's brains go spraying out the front is chilling.
I'm italian and I'm 15. Today I had to prepare a project for school. I chose to study JFK's life. I didn't know who he was before, now I totally appreciate him, he was a great man and It's sad to see this video, people fear the greatest man, he was one of them. He will never be forget. RIP
But you're right it appears that the frames are not missing, as in many versions, but undamaged? It looks like its 100 years old and left outside, there's shit flying everywhere and its still been boxed out. The only thing it proves is someone did cut the frames and this one is repaired nice.
i agree the head shot could have come from anywhere, but where it definitely didnt come from is behind. it's unbelieveable that the american public let themselves be sold such lies
@stoneeh errr.. it's totally obvious if you just view the blast to his head? take a look at slow motion versions of the film if you have to. one should also add that definitely no normal bullet was used in this, as it obviously used all of its energy on impact and there is no defined exit wound
@stoneeh "definitely no normal bullet was used in this, as it obviously used all of its energy on impact and there is no defined exit wound" - I have to agree with that. It makes sense. If you're going to kill the president of the United States you use the most powerful destructive ammo ....exploding bullet, hollow point or some kind of specialist 'dum dum' round.
@stoneeh The majority of the American public has never believed it. Polls as far back as the 1960's show that two-thirds of people didn't believe the Warren Report, so the public wasn't entirely fooled. Both then and now, most people know it was a conspiracy, and recent books document LBJ's own involvement in it.
If you watch closely, or search-up an enlarged slow-motion version, EVERYONE in the vehicle moves briefly forward. Why would they do that? Because, even as many witnesses reported, the driver abruptly stopped the vehicle.
There was actually more to be seen between the time of the forward motion and the point at which the fatal wound was incurred.
The fact that Mrs. Kennedy went onto the trunk to retrieve a piece of her husband's brain could be used to get an angle of the head shot. There are a couple of pieces on the trunk. Why would a rear angle shot leave pieces of his brain and skull on the trunk?
@rogerscottq You do not understand physics. Any shot could cause brain matter to travel in the same direction the shot came from.
The brain cavity is an enclosed area. And every motion has an equal and opposite reaction.
When a bullet enters the brain cavity it increases the pressure from the sudden enterance of the bullet's weight traveling at a high velocity, and causes material to exit the enterance of the bullet.
Example: Stab a soda can and see if soda doesn't spray on your hand.
@rogerscottq when a bullet passes through it creates a pressure wave in the skull - which blows the skull and brain matter out - like a small explosion.
They kiled Kennedy! You bastards! I think we all know why this great man was killed. He was dangerous material to the "united states"...no i wont say to the "united states". I'll say, "to the gov't". Who was the last President to actually ever mention God. Or wat was ACTUALLY just? He was used for a moment but when he was done with wat the system needed him for, well he just wasnt of any value to the govt anymore. on contrary, didnt fit in the plans of the Rulers. This country is F&*#%D
See Evidence of Revision on You Tube, it's long but it's amazing. One speech that Kennedy made attacking the Steel corporations for profiteering is a good example. Can you imagine a President doing that? Also, the documentary, that is in 6 parts, doesn't use sound bites but chunks of speeches by many involved in the US at that time.
@GeppettoBrett He was bumped off because he was trying to do good for the American people, instead of bending over backwards for big-money special interests...
"Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country..."
That statement goes against everything Congress and politicians stand for. They enter office with modest or comfortable means, and leave millionaires and billionaires. They are VERY interested in what their country can do for them.
@dreaminvasion they skim off the top. i know several of these guys. including the bush-babies. what happens is the money circuklating around the globe tends to increase, unless a financial disaster occurs. then they take chunks off the profits. but i hear ya. they got lots of dosh.
@GeppettoBrett Johnny Roselli was Sam Giancana;s right hand man and had been (as he saw it) persecuted and forced into exiled by RFK. All the mafia were being targeted at this time. More than enough reason to have JFK killed - catholic or not.
Mafia, CIA, Castro, Cuban exiles, Hoover, LBJ. ALL had good reasons for wanting JFK dead.
(Part 2).Of which, the third was the fatal head shot. The head shot is an exit wound, the forehead peels back to knock the cheekbones backwards violently. There was no other gunman.
Because Oswal is an activist, a self-confessed communist, you can only agree with that. It is pointless to say, 'yeah, but he could just be saying that.'
Oswald had the technical skill to pull off the shot, the area is tiny something like ninety feet. From an elevated position. This way Gravity hes less effect.
Here's what happened...Ed Clark organized the entire plan to kill JFK. Although Oswald was involved in the conspiracy the two shots he fired missed JFK badly due to his excitement. Oswald was a patsy. Mac Wallace was in the TSBD with Oswald and fired one shot. That shot hit Kennedy in the shoulder exiting through his throat. The shot was not fatal. "Junior" was in the grassy tree covered area 150 yds straight away. He fired the one fatal shot striking JFK in the head.
They should have back tracked Oswalds activities and whom he was associating with months before the incident. Someone set him up as the fall guy i have no doubt. You find out who he was associating with and youll have your answer of who was behind this murder.
@pntdblack you might find it interesting to know that Oswald actually defected to the soviet union before he returned to the U.S. and shot JFK, I am not and have never been big into conspiracy theories especially when such an obvious motive, although in a somewhat unknown fact, is presented and is totally logical (more so in my opinion than a conspiracy within the secret service)
@pntdblack Many researchers have done so. Oswald had connections to both the FBI & CIA, as well as to Jack Ruby, David Ferrie, Clay Shaw & Guy Bannister. He was set up to be the fall guy for the assassination - thus a 'patsy'.
since the blood explodes outward on his front right side, wouldn't that mean that the bullet exited from there? which would mean that it entered from the back?
I don't know about his stuff . . . that's just how I'd imagine it.
I have read the Warren Commission report on the subsequent inquest. Believe me when I say that Oswald and Oswald alone was responsible for the assassination.
The question that doesnt get answered is who was he working for?
It is quite possible that he was working alone.
It is also possible that he was working for the CIA, but not the Russians or Mafia.
@GeppettoBrett yeah they dug his grave up in the early 80s and . . . drum roll . . . it was oswald in it. what a surprise. His brother has a court case going because the funeral compnay took the original casket after they exhumed him and auctioned it off.
@GeppettoBrett Oswalds grave was dug up in 1981 because some person claimed that it was not Oswald in it. But dental records proved it was. What reason were you curious as to to the grave being dug up if i may ask?
@ngagemydude13 You're a fucking retard. At least come up with some original "secret societies". Let's be honest: how long have the Illumiati been inactive? How many charities have the Freemasons started? And do you even know what the Illuminati stood for? Seriously, read a history book.
Zapruder was a cool guy. Of the money he made after selling the film to Life Magazine (equal to a little over a million dollars - in today's value), he gave $25,000 to the widow of the Dallas cop also shot that day. Decent dude.
@pellebravesskylar Well, the stupidest thing he did was to sell it to LIFE. He should have hung onto it - by selling it to them it allowed the conspirators to take possession of the film and alter it.
@TheLensSolution He should have made four copies and kept two for himself. Then if any editing was done he had the original to reference it against. But you can't really blame him, those times were different. People trusted government and authority
@cronechach head actually is moving forward a down a bit, you can find nice demonstrations of this by frame analysis and the explosion of right side of skull pushes head leftward after.
@abennett4 You are obvoiusly very well-read on this subject, so let me ask you this: How do you explain the fact that Lee Harvey Oswald was a "below-average sniper" according to his fellow marines, and also when the top Marine Corps sniper was given the same rifle, he could not perform the feat that was performed on that day? Also, please explain why the bullet that they found on JFK's gurney was in pristene condition- no evidence what-so-ever of it ever being fired.
@drakkoli1 i didn't say that lee harvey oswald for sure killed jfk, i just said there is no way it was the driver. there are a lot of very fishy things about the whole thing but that driver being the shooter thing is really ridiculous to me. you can see both his hands on the steering wheel plus, the way jfk recoils is incongruent with that idea.
@TheSagethomas i didn't know the driver didn't like him ... how do we know that? or why didn't he? but still that doesn't mean much. i don't like a lot of people but it doesn't mean i killed them.
Yeah because you know you watch the video and yeah... Damn shiny hair on peoples neck when you turn around when have your left hand up to fix that shiny hair on your neck... Oops?
@dorisblake Yeah I don't see how anyone can actually believe that lol.. Don't you think someone close by would have noticed? They were only surrounded by dozens/hundreds of people...
@moguy200979 heheh that's the best plan he could come up with, shoot jfk real quick while trying to drive with the whole country watching. yeah, i don't think so.
watch clearer films and you'll see for sure the driver had a gun and it kicks before he pulls it away,it was a co2 gun with exploding round ...watch jackie try to escape the driver and secret service preventing her
@poortogee77 The ' gun ' was the reflection off the slicked down hair of the passenger sat alongside (Roy Kellerman ?). The 'recoil' is merely the passenger's head lurching forward as the driver brakes. Watch it again and you will see what I mean.
OMFG ive just noticed the driver pulls out something shiny and very eye catching, and holds it over his sholder and people will say how did he know where to aim the gun, i think he looked into the windscreen of the car and lined it up
It's not a gun. It's the very shiny hair of the passenger next to him. Trust me I thought it was a gun too but I looked at some brightened images and you can clearly see it's the other dude's shiny ass hair. Bummer.
@JdScooterClips The ' gun ' was the reflection off the slicked down hair of the passenger sat alongside (Roy Kellerman ?). The 'recoil' is merely the passenger's head lurching forward as the driver brakes. Watch it again and you will see what I mean.
THE BULLET THAT GOT HIM IN THE NECK --COULD-- HAVE BEEN FIRED FROM BEHIND AND PASSED THREW HIS THROAT OR WHERE EVER,, JUST BECAUSE HE HELD HIS NECK DOSNT MEAN IT CAME FROM THE FRONT BUT I DEF THINK IT WASNT OSWALD --IF-- HE HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT, BUT HE PROB WAS INVOLVED IN SOME WAY,
@aacrowley897 Cooper was a fool. He also said that JFK was shot with a pellet containing fish toxin. Why shoot toxin into someone's head when you're blasting away a quarter of their skull with an exploding round ? ...DUMB
The reason he was bent over right before the shot to the head is because he was already shot through the front of the neck indicating more than one shooter. If you look closely you can see Kennedy use both hands in reaching for his throat. Then Jackie leans closer to him because she knew something was wrong. Then the fatal bullet strikes him in the head and it was over. I'm not sure who exactly killed him but I know there had to be more than one shooter.
Why was he bending over like in a trance before he was shot? He was obviuosly kind of bent over before the shot... In any case FUCK the US for doing this to the ONLY real president of the USA!!!
Comment removed
TheAmbassador11 4 days ago
uDaMaGeD? LOOK AGAIN. Note the SHADOWS before the head shot & AFTER the head $hot; it's not normal. Also, this 'version' dose not have the motorcade when it turns on to ELM, when there's a 'break' in the filming. 'They' $tarted $hooting when the limo turned on to Elm. Note the 'family' thats calmly standing in foreground while Jackie is already climbing on the back, & others around them are diving for cover. The guy diving to the grounds shadow is DIFFERENT than those standing nearby.
AnitaCock 1 week ago
How was standing to the left of Mary Morman, he has a movie camera rolling, where is that film, also all the other filim that day, beverey oliver's film, the Z flim is faked to show, like only 3 shots were fired, yet the GC 000, was hit a least 7 times including the person's inside, unless the guilty can be brought to justice and the laws in dallas alow that the family members of the guilty can pay for the crime, then it's all a waste of time.
7071t6 1 week ago
@7071t6 That was a Mr. Nix and his film has been shown and it is on here. But Beverly Oliver was filming too, she was to the right of Mary Moorman, FBI came and took her film and it hasn't been seen since.
TakeBackAmerica2012 3 days ago
Look up Executive Order 11110 then look at the Federal Reserve
jonathanpascal25 1 week ago
Back and to the left
briangoldfarb 1 week ago
0:50 holy shit guys..william cooper was right..is it me or do you guys clearly see the driver turn around and pull out a gun when kennedy is shot? Look closely at the driver..WTF
Godcaly123 1 week ago
@Godcaly123 No he does look back but trust me, he does not have a gun, it is a reflection of sunlight on Kellerman's head. It had me fooled at first too. Don't buy into that theory, it is bogus.
TakeBackAmerica2012 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch this! search on youtube this --------> Zapruder Film with Dictabelt Recording 2 - YouTube.flv" i didnt believe the limo driver but maybe this can change your mind
XxTAY1ORG4NGxX 2 weeks ago
nah i think the undamaged part still belongs 2 either the FBI, CIA, the Lyndon Johnson family Estate, the Pentagon, the MOB, or maybe Castro had it framed and put on his loungeroom wall...lol
andyww68 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
elfving73 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
elfving73 3 weeks ago
so how do you explain the Associated Press releasing a patsy bio of Oswald minutes after he's arrested in a theatre? Who paid these so called French Mafia in heroin to kill JFK?
LarryCarterCenter 3 weeks ago
@LarryCarterCenter back when american justice with bill curtis first came out and it and other news agencies wasnt controlled by the 6 corps. (disney , GE , CBS , viacom and 2 others ) they did a show on this. . . they never did find out where the contract came from but in my opinion it was the world banks , the BIG money look at history , whoever prints debt free money gets killed or almost in jacksons case . . i have never seen this show since then and ive researched other sources
songcollector07 3 weeks ago
@LarryCarterCenter Either HL Hunt or Clint Murchison or both. Also George HW Bush big CIA at that time, probably had some role in it. CIA is one of biggest drug dealers in the world, has been since the 60s. Google Iran Contra
TakeBackAmerica2012 1 week ago
@LarryCarterCenter the french mafia supplied the heroin to its shooters , research it and let me know what u find , and from what i,ve researched whoever is really in power( the world banks , rothchilds ect ) has people in key positions throughout the military industrial complex look i dont want to get into a big debate with you if you dont believe what i do thats fine i respect that ok?
songcollector07 1 week ago
The truth . . . . The italian maffia turned down the contract on JFK and the french maffia accepted it there were 4 shooters who were all paid with pounds of heroin whoever the contract came from had people in the texas state police the CIA and the military among other agencies . . . listen im tired of hearing from nonbelievers do your damn homework the truth is out there you just gotta find i
songcollector07 3 weeks ago
@songcollector07 how do you know this?
eb081530 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Israeli Mossad killed JFK,(Catholic), Israel got Nukes soon after,which JFK prevented.
JFK also pushed interest free Currency & Deescalating 'Nam,Jewry expanded War with Him Dead.
FINAL JUDGMENT book By Michael C. Piper was BANNED-Indicts Israel.
Zapruder (a Jew),got to 'film' & made millions & (CIA/Mossad) could edit the film. Jack Ruby Rubenstein=Patsy
Jews promote/were behind Communism & run a Fascist Israeli state-Apartheid.
Israel=World capital of Organ,Arms,drug,Porn trafficking.
StSimonMartyr 2 weeks ago
@songcollector07 Thank you I feel the same way. Have been researching since 1992. I didn't know about the Italian Mafia turning down contract though. Thanks for that. You know about more than one Oswald right?
TakeBackAmerica2012 1 week ago
@TakeBackAmerica2012 i have heard something but share whith me what you know please . . . and i heard the italian mafia turned the contract down on american justice , also it was never said where the contract came from , the high profile reporter that did the piece handed his research over to the FBI and nothing ever happened after that i've only seen this episode once back in the late 90's /early 2000's now they just show murder and drug stories
songcollector07 1 week ago
@songcollector07 The book, Harvey and Lee by John Armstrong. I don't have it anymore but you may be able to get a copy on the internet. You will be convinced but really if you look at all the photos of him, the ones from Dallas and the ones from Russian clearly show two different men. I will send you a link I have on my hard drive to your message box. Also, have you heard of Robert Morningstar's research on J.D. Tippit??? It will knock your socks off.
TakeBackAmerica2012 1 week ago
I DONT NEED YOUR PERMISSION TO SPEAK FOR EVERYONE DOLTBOY. NOT ARROGANT CERTAIN YOU ARROGANT DOLT. WILLIAM COOPER WAS FAR BEYOND YOUR PETTY IDIOCIES SON YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT HE COULD OR COULD NOT HAVE SEEN. YOU ALSO DO NOT KNOW THE LAW ENFORCEMENT PEOPLE I KNOW AND WHO HAVE REVEALED TONS TO ME AND ITS ALL TRUE DOLT BOYS. NOW GET YER TERLET PAPER AND LETS BEND OVER SO YOU CAN GET THAT CHIT OUTA YOUR ACE CRACK AND EARS OK ONE TWO THREE WIPE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
aacrowley897 3 weeks ago
FUNKDOLT BALLLONEY thats all i have to say BULLONEY. YOUR AS UNOBSERVANT AS THE FLEAS ON YOUR CROTCH! LMAO. WHAT A BUNCH OF DOLTS. You balless twiddly dees cannot venture beyond whats OK to believe you sheeple politician terd eating twits! WILLIAM GREER SHOT KENNEDY WHETHER YOU BELIEVE IT OR NOT I DONT SPEAK TO ARGUE WITH DOLTS I AM HERE TO SPEAK THE TRUTH AND BE A VOICE FOR IT IN A FORUM OF DOLTNESS AND STUPIDITY. WAKE UP DOLTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
aacrowley897 3 weeks ago
oswald did and it was impossible NOW HEAR THIS YOU ACEWIPES you werent even crapping diapers when this happened and i dont care how damned blind you are or how stupid NONE OF YOUR SILLY CRAP LACKING OF INTELLIGENCE COMMENTS OR YOUR BLIND OBSERVATIONS MATTER THERE IS NOTHING IN THE WORLD YOU CAN DO OR SAY THAT WILL MAKE YOUR SILLY STORY VALID TO YOU YES YOU DOLTS ARE AFRAID TO SEE THE LIES YOUR TESTICULARLY CHALLENGED THATS APPARENT BUT DONT THINK BECAUSE YOU SPEW SOME SENSLESS BALONEY it matters
aacrowley897 3 weeks ago
no one needs to stop SQUAT you dolts dont know your buttholes from your nose. BALONEY the film you dolts see is the one they want you to see dolt boys you havent heard the confession? WHat a bunch of twiddly dees. no the film doesnt prove jack because its not the right one. Thousands have seen the real untouched zapruder film but not you dolts. an jesse ventura a navy seal and qualified sniper for the military took the very same rifle and tried to fire off three shots in the time they say
aacrowley897 3 weeks ago
You need to stop this conspiracy theory nonsense. No genuine evidence of any other weapons or shooters or shots. All genuine evidrnce shows without a doubt thst Owald acting alone shot JFK.
oriolesfan61 3 weeks ago
The film proves no shot fron the front. The film proves the wounding shot and tbe killing shot came from behind. Recreations prove all wounds could only be caused by Oswalds rifle from the Schoolbook Depository.
oriolesfan61 3 weeks ago
HEY FUNKTWIDDLYDEE we dont give a damn if you comment your ignorant remarks arent needed COOPER WAS A YALE GRAD AND NONE OF YOUR SILLY CRAP MEANS SQUAT dolt. They shot him with poison to be sure he would die in case the shot didnt kill him you stupid retard. I cant help it if your silly made up logic doesnt jive with what happened DOLT@! william greer shot kennedy right there in the car just like william cooper said he did. And the damned film was edited and retouched.
aacrowley897 3 weeks ago
@aacrowley897 Who are YOU to speak on behalf of everyone that looks at these comments. You arrogant prick. Look at the head wound, - explosive bullet. NO toxin needed. Cooper also claimed to have access to documents that he could never have been able to see at his level of rank. Greer DID not kill JFK. The so called gun is the shine of the slicked down hair of the agent next to him and the 'recoil' is that agent lurching forward as the limo almost slows to a halt
funkmasterjee 3 weeks ago
9 is a false quote LBJ had no knowledge of when the assassination attempt was going to be. Ed Clark wanted it that way so that goes out the door and i cant see his 10th point. To answer your previous question about to "junior" he is and always will be known as that. Clark wanted his identity kept secret. Only LBJ, Clark, and Mac Wallace knew who he truly was.
mrbouff4855 4 weeks ago
@mrbouff4855 LBJ DID have prior knowledge. The statement from his former mistress clearly indicates that the night before, he knew it was going to be the next day in Dallas. The video of the interview with her is on Youtube. Either you believe her or you don't. I have no reason to disbelieve her.
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
I wasn't going to comment on this again but @funkmasterjee is killing me...The Zapruder film was never edited only refined for clarity. Do I believe their is a conspiracy yea but funks 1-10 points are absurd. I'm not even going to touch on 3-6 because they are almost irrelevant. 1 is true 2 i honestly dont know 7 is false 2 eye witnesses saw oswald light up tippet and then run 8 is untrue because the film wasnt edited.... cont
mrbouff4855 4 weeks ago
@mrbouff4855 I think it's pretty obvious that the Zapruder film was tampered with. There are film experts who have said so. There are just too many suspicious things involving the film. Why was it hidden from the public for so many years? Why was it originally published backwards? Why did Dan Rather misdescribe it to the public and then have to admit later he was wrong?
TheLensSolution 4 weeks ago
@mrbouff4855 There are film anomalies that just do NOT occur with any camera, camera malfunction or not. I have been over these already in detail. . Point 6 is HIGHLY relevant, Point 7: Bullet grooves are like fingerprints. They couldn't be matched. It would be thrown out of court. Point 7: there are also witnesses to the Tippet shooting who gave descriptions that contradict Oswald's appearance (height, clothing etc) Point 8: Yes the film WAS edited (ref. earlier details)
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mrbouff4855 All in all, if Oswald were tried on ALL the evidence we have today he would almost certainly be acquitted. There were multiple witnesses from the street to a second person on the 6th floor. Once you accept that, you have to accept there WAS a conspiracy
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
Anybody care to comment on Oswald's taking a "Getaway Bus" that was headed right back to the scene of the crime of the century? Hah! Or then giving up the cab to a lady after the bus was stalled in traffic? This is The Warren Commission's story? Really? Or that the entire police department and assistant DA dropped everything concerning a presidential assassination to descend upon a movie theater to capture a patron who was reported to have NOT paid his 25 cent admission fee? Really? Wake Up!
glendonj 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@glendonj "Or that the entire police department and assistant DA dropped everything concerning a presidential assassination to descend upon a movie theater to capture a patron who was reported to have NOT paid his 25 cent admission fee" - precisely. They knew Oswald was a missing employee, but so what? How would they know he was hiding in a movie theatre? Not paying a 25 cent admission fee?...they would probably expect the staff to remove him and might not even send one cop. Ridiculous
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
look at the driver at :51 hes holding a gun
59Fiftyrox 1 month ago
@59Fiftyrox do u mean the reflection off the guy in the passenger seats hair?
gracom1977 1 month ago
@59Fiftyrox -_-. When in the film does the driver turn around and point a pistol at kennedy or conally? besides, the wounds they recieved isn't consistant with that of a pistol that the driver may or may not've concealed. The rounds that damaged Kennedy and conally came from an upward trajectory, and from behind, most importantly. The bullets used were 6.5 millimeter steel core centerfire rifle rounds, Which could not've been fired from a pistol, as a pistol could not house this sort of round.
ninjax261 4 weeks ago
@ninjax261 The round that hit Conally most certainly did NOT come from an upward trajectory. That's BS. The round went through a rib and then his wrist and ended up in his thigh. That's a DOWNWARD trajectory.
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
Proof that the Zapruder film has been deliberately altered (and of CONSPIRACY) -
Take a look at the lamp post at 0:41 to 0:45. Does it look a little odd? Like it's been cut out or something ? That's because the part of the film has been cut out and re-timed to create the impression that the limo kept going and didn't virtually stop. It was done also to hide TWO almost simultaneous head shots. Almost simultaneous means Oswald could NOT have acted alone - hence CONSPIRACY PROVEN.
funkmasterjee 1 month ago
There are other anomalies like shadows of observers becoming sharp and then soft again and an anomaly where a man appears to move his legs from close together to standing legs slightly apart in less than one frame (1/18th of a second) - evidence of frame removal
funkmasterjee 1 month ago
@funkmasterjee Lies. WHO THE FUCK would say two people shot Kennedy and all this other shit oh and i bet you think that9/11 was an inside job . Go tell your BULLSHIT lies and theorys elsewhere dumbass
TheAmazemanjr1 1 month ago
@TheAmazemanjr1 Wooohoo! looks like I struck a raw nerve with YOU. :oD It's reassuring to get confirmation from obvious disinfo shills like yourself that I am very close to the truth. True to form you use aggression, ridicule and insult as a substitute for rational argument. Classic behaviour. Thank you for your confirmation.
funkmasterjee 1 month ago
@funkmasterjee . How the hell would you know what happened back in 1963. YOU are the one misinformed.what you are saying is like saying the Titanic never sank or Steve Jobs or Michael Jackson never died. Get your damn facts straight
TheAmazemanjr1 4 weeks ago
@TheAmazemanjr1 Check out the anomalies in the Zapruder film. If you examine it closely enough you have to conclude there had to be a conspiracy
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
@TheAmazemanjr1 Everything I have said is based on evidence and reasonable deduction. Nothing more, nothing less
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
@funkmasterjee How do you know what they hid, then? were you there? did you see the original? So, instead of sitting at your computer theorizing about soemthing you know nothing about, go read the fucking warren commission, or get a firsthand account. Your claim is nothing but assumption, and assertion, without any evidence. Sorry, you're not as smart as you'd like to think you are.
ninjax261 4 weeks ago
@ninjax261 Check out the anomalies in the Zapruder film. I bet you haven't even done that
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
@funkmasterjee I've seen the anomalies. Just because there's an anomaly doesn't mean there is a conspiracy. Besides, even if there was a conspiracy, and the footage was tampered with, which is very unlikely, as cameras from then are known to skip frames, there is not enough evidence-- scratch that, there is NO evidence to conclude a conspiracy. You cant make an assertion like that based solely on assumption, and a malfunctioning camera.
ninjax261 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ninjax261 There are certain anomalies that cannot be put down to camera malfunction. The only explanation for those is tampering, i.e editing. Once you accept that evidence has been edited in ANY way you have to ask yourself WHAT is being hidden, and WHY?
You are entitled to believe that the film has not been tampered with. That's your right, but I think you're kidding yourself. I make assertions based on what my own two eyes see, not assumption.
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
@ninjax261 "How do you know what they hid, then? " - simple deduction. If you separate out a film and rescale and re-edit part of it - it's for a reason. I didn't need to be there. Examining a film in detail is hardly assumption. You seem to have swallowed the warren Report hook line and sinker. That's a massive assumption rather than using free thought.
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
@funkmasterjee 'simple deduction'? You can't deduce a conspiracy from a small edit in a clip, and look, i'm not saying there is or isn't a conspiracy, all I'm saying is that, This film can not, and will not provide enough evidence to say so or otherwise. Besides, it may not be an edit at all, it might be a skip in the film, which, as i said before isn't uncommon of the time, especially with 8mm film.
ninjax261 4 weeks ago
@ninjax261 It's not a simple as a skipped frame or two. There are shadows that go from soft to sharp and back again, evidence of a the lamp post being 'cut out' and being part of one half of a 'composite'. Search for ' JFK's revenge part 1- the Zapruder film was altered ' on Youtube for all the details
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
@funkmasterjee I'd like to know, who declared you omnipotent? Just because the film is altered, Oswald didn't shoot him? Just because there is a se of 'altered frames' means there's a conspiracy? who feed you your information? You can't make an assumption, or 'deduction' from a film with missing frames. I'm sorry, but it doesn't work that way. And your theory is full of holes, besides the fact that it creates more questions than it answers. It's a small, hole-riddled assumption, and nothing more
ninjax261 3 weeks ago
@ninjax261 Who said I was omnipotent?? ...I didn't. The fact that the film was altered means there HAS to be a conspiracy. If it happened exactly as the WC said, why tamper with the Z film ?? I grant you anything is hard to prove conclusively, but there are just too many anomalies (not just with with the Z film) to believe the findings of the WC. By the way it's not just missing frames with the Z film, there are far more anomalies
funkmasterjee 3 weeks ago
@funkmasterjee Well, look. I'm not saying that it's one way or another. I'm not saying i do or don't believe there's a conspiracy, i'm jus pointing out the holes in your theory. I mean, the film obviously has anomalies, But it may have even been tampered with by the owner, and cameras like that missing frames isn't uncommon. Maybe he had faulty film to begin with? I'm not saying your theory isn't viable, im just saying its... holey. And it certainly creates more questions than it answers.
ninjax261 3 weeks ago
@funkmasterjee Besides; what you're implying is that someone deliberately edited the film, and if that's even true, it still creates more unanswered questions, such as who edited it? who had their hand on the film that could've edited it? Your 'deduction' is nothing but an assumption based off of a skipped frame or two.
ninjax261 4 weeks ago
he kind a desrved it becuz of water gate an shit
datash105 1 month ago
@datash105 hahahahahahaha... dumb
1800Snikers 1 month ago
@datash105 Watergate was Nixon. 1972-1973
funkmasterjee 1 month ago
@datash105 Retard....
Warlock952 1 month ago
@datash105 I hope you are not an American,if you are I fear for my countrymen.
OurOxygen 1 month ago
@datash105 Holy shit, you're absolutely retarded. Wrong candidate, dumbfuck.
ninjax261 4 weeks ago
Yes, you can actually see the 3 bullet holes in the
Stemmons freeway sign
but only if you freeze frame # 209.
Needs verbal wording to describe the 3 holes
Youtube paul8kangas
paul8kangas 1 month ago
I had never actually taken the time to watch this famous film before, but the part at 0:53 where the shot hits and Kennedy's brains go spraying out the front is chilling.
Thrifty032781 1 month ago
@ubtoby Hahahahahaha.
ZombieEater2010 1 month ago
I'm italian and I'm 15. Today I had to prepare a project for school. I chose to study JFK's life. I didn't know who he was before, now I totally appreciate him, he was a great man and It's sad to see this video, people fear the greatest man, he was one of them. He will never be forget. RIP
xohbieber 1 month ago 3
But you're right it appears that the frames are not missing, as in many versions, but undamaged? It looks like its 100 years old and left outside, there's shit flying everywhere and its still been boxed out. The only thing it proves is someone did cut the frames and this one is repaired nice.
anewgift4u 1 month ago in playlist JFK assassination videos
The frames were gone before Time bought it. Duh.
anewgift4u 1 month ago in playlist JFK assassination videos
Not tonight dear, I have a headache...
ubtoby 1 month ago
@ubtoby You're an asshole.
SamuelJacobMcMichael 1 month ago
i agree the head shot could have come from anywhere, but where it definitely didnt come from is behind. it's unbelieveable that the american public let themselves be sold such lies
stoneeh 1 month ago
@stoneeh And you base this observation on what? Be specific.
cookiepush1 1 month ago
@stoneeh errr.. it's totally obvious if you just view the blast to his head? take a look at slow motion versions of the film if you have to. one should also add that definitely no normal bullet was used in this, as it obviously used all of its energy on impact and there is no defined exit wound
stoneeh 1 month ago
@stoneeh "definitely no normal bullet was used in this, as it obviously used all of its energy on impact and there is no defined exit wound" - I have to agree with that. It makes sense. If you're going to kill the president of the United States you use the most powerful destructive ammo ....exploding bullet, hollow point or some kind of specialist 'dum dum' round.
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
@stoneeh The majority of the American public has never believed it. Polls as far back as the 1960's show that two-thirds of people didn't believe the Warren Report, so the public wasn't entirely fooled. Both then and now, most people know it was a conspiracy, and recent books document LBJ's own involvement in it.
TheLensSolution 1 month ago
look he was shot with a 6.5 mm that a big round that why are pieces every were
ledzep22100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I said we need to get the guys at CERN on this.
jduplechin 1 month ago
We need to get the guys at CERN on this.
jduplechin 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Frames of the film were removed.
If you watch closely, or search-up an enlarged slow-motion version, EVERYONE in the vehicle moves briefly forward. Why would they do that? Because, even as many witnesses reported, the driver abruptly stopped the vehicle.
There was actually more to be seen between the time of the forward motion and the point at which the fatal wound was incurred.
shortist2003 1 month ago
40-50 secs you can see the driver pull the gun
datboylunadoe 1 month ago
@datboylunadoe It was a glare on the passengers head.
WhosBrons 1 month ago
that second shot was on the money.
spankydarko 1 month ago
The fact that Mrs. Kennedy went onto the trunk to retrieve a piece of her husband's brain could be used to get an angle of the head shot. There are a couple of pieces on the trunk. Why would a rear angle shot leave pieces of his brain and skull on the trunk?
rogerscottq 1 month ago
@rogerscottq You do not understand physics. Any shot could cause brain matter to travel in the same direction the shot came from.
The brain cavity is an enclosed area. And every motion has an equal and opposite reaction.
When a bullet enters the brain cavity it increases the pressure from the sudden enterance of the bullet's weight traveling at a high velocity, and causes material to exit the enterance of the bullet.
Example: Stab a soda can and see if soda doesn't spray on your hand.
BowskiBig 1 month ago
@BowskiBig such matter would also be liquefied by that same force and the bullet.
any solid chunks can only be expelled along the path of the bullet.
Whisper6911 1 month ago
@rogerscottq when a bullet passes through it creates a pressure wave in the skull - which blows the skull and brain matter out - like a small explosion.
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
fake and gay
AverageTerror 1 month ago
@AverageTerror do you just randomly say such things? like burping and farting? not all the time just when you're full of it?
TeslaKuhn33 1 month ago
Why wasn't the driver driving faster?
Th3Trooper 1 month ago
They kiled Kennedy! You bastards! I think we all know why this great man was killed. He was dangerous material to the "united states"...no i wont say to the "united states". I'll say, "to the gov't". Who was the last President to actually ever mention God. Or wat was ACTUALLY just? He was used for a moment but when he was done with wat the system needed him for, well he just wasnt of any value to the govt anymore. on contrary, didnt fit in the plans of the Rulers. This country is F&*#%D
theolide07 1 month ago 2
See Evidence of Revision on You Tube, it's long but it's amazing. One speech that Kennedy made attacking the Steel corporations for profiteering is a good example. Can you imagine a President doing that? Also, the documentary, that is in 6 parts, doesn't use sound bites but chunks of speeches by many involved in the US at that time.
martynhanson 1 month ago
Anybody notice what the driver does between 0:49 and 0:53?
liexcheatxnxsteal 1 month ago
@liexcheatxnxsteal WTF...
dreaminvasion 1 month ago
@liexcheatxnxsteal he dont do nothing except react to the situation behind him.
GeppettoBrett 1 month ago
(part 3) The question is, is Who the fuck was Oswald working for?
But you can work it out. The Mob would never in a million years kill a Catholic President.
Can you see a black killing Obama? Think about it.
The rest is history. easy.
GeppettoBrett 2 months ago
@GeppettoBrett He was bumped off because he was trying to do good for the American people, instead of bending over backwards for big-money special interests...
"Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country..."
That statement goes against everything Congress and politicians stand for. They enter office with modest or comfortable means, and leave millionaires and billionaires. They are VERY interested in what their country can do for them.
dreaminvasion 1 month ago
@dreaminvasion they skim off the top. i know several of these guys. including the bush-babies. what happens is the money circuklating around the globe tends to increase, unless a financial disaster occurs. then they take chunks off the profits. but i hear ya. they got lots of dosh.
GeppettoBrett 1 month ago
@GeppettoBrett Johnny Roselli was Sam Giancana;s right hand man and had been (as he saw it) persecuted and forced into exiled by RFK. All the mafia were being targeted at this time. More than enough reason to have JFK killed - catholic or not.
Mafia, CIA, Castro, Cuban exiles, Hoover, LBJ. ALL had good reasons for wanting JFK dead.
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
(Part 2).Of which, the third was the fatal head shot. The head shot is an exit wound, the forehead peels back to knock the cheekbones backwards violently. There was no other gunman.
Because Oswal is an activist, a self-confessed communist, you can only agree with that. It is pointless to say, 'yeah, but he could just be saying that.'
Oswald had the technical skill to pull off the shot, the area is tiny something like ninety feet. From an elevated position. This way Gravity hes less effect.
GeppettoBrett 2 months ago
If Oswald was dug up in '81, his body was killed in Dallas. By Jack Ruby. Presumably a Catholic retaliation, and nothing more.
Oswald either worked alone, or the CIA employed Ruby to kill him afterwards.
He could not have been a Double Agent BECAUSE his body was killed in Dallas.
The CIA, IF they employed him, had him killed for a previous defection, with Jack Ruby.
Three shots were fired over the course of six seconds. The barrel was ready for use. This leaves six seconds to fire 2 shots.
GeppettoBrett 2 months ago
ouch
snownball122 2 months ago
LBJ killed JFK
o0soda0o 2 months ago
Here's what happened...Ed Clark organized the entire plan to kill JFK. Although Oswald was involved in the conspiracy the two shots he fired missed JFK badly due to his excitement. Oswald was a patsy. Mac Wallace was in the TSBD with Oswald and fired one shot. That shot hit Kennedy in the shoulder exiting through his throat. The shot was not fatal. "Junior" was in the grassy tree covered area 150 yds straight away. He fired the one fatal shot striking JFK in the head.
mrbouff4855 2 months ago
@mrbouff4855 when you say "Junior" who are you referring to ?
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
its like seeing videos of the twin towers collapsing,its still shocking every time
aerlingus18 2 months ago 17
@aerlingus18 well said...very numbing and heartbreaking
neilzep 1 month ago
the driver did it. watch as soon as he gets shot he jolts back. blood comes out the front because it brakes skin and causes blood to spurt
omfgitsciso 2 months ago
@omfgitsciso Yeah the driver shot JFK and NOT a single one of the thousands of people watching the event as it unfolded say him do it... Moron.
NowKillYourself 2 months ago
They should have back tracked Oswalds activities and whom he was associating with months before the incident. Someone set him up as the fall guy i have no doubt. You find out who he was associating with and youll have your answer of who was behind this murder.
pntdblack 2 months ago
@pntdblack you might find it interesting to know that Oswald actually defected to the soviet union before he returned to the U.S. and shot JFK, I am not and have never been big into conspiracy theories especially when such an obvious motive, although in a somewhat unknown fact, is presented and is totally logical (more so in my opinion than a conspiracy within the secret service)
CaptainKzer 2 months ago
@pntdblack Many researchers have done so. Oswald had connections to both the FBI & CIA, as well as to Jack Ruby, David Ferrie, Clay Shaw & Guy Bannister. He was set up to be the fall guy for the assassination - thus a 'patsy'.
TheLensSolution 1 month ago
Why was Kennedy looking down prior to getting shot?
connzz420 2 months ago
@connzz420 He was after been shot in the throat and in the back, he was dying or dead and never felt the head shot, i hope.
cruisersism 2 months ago
@connzz420 im pretty sure he was hit in the neck by a bullet before the shot to the head
devpoke513 2 months ago
@connzz420 he was shot in the neck
bob1you0 2 months ago
since the blood explodes outward on his front right side, wouldn't that mean that the bullet exited from there? which would mean that it entered from the back?
I don't know about his stuff . . . that's just how I'd imagine it.
Thanks to anyone who can answer my question!
macdaddylorenzo 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You would have to be blind or stupid not see that was a frontal head shot
that came from JFK.s 2:00 position who what why or whatever i do not know what i know is that was in fact a frontal head shot ....
DOGGREEN131 2 months ago
You would have to be blind or stupid not see that was a
that came from JFK.s 2:00 position who what why or whatever i do not know what i know is that was in fact a frontal head shot ....
DOGGREEN131 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He was shot from the front! The warren commission was full of shit!
02WIFE 2 months ago
he was shot from the front1 The warren commission was full of shit!
02WIFE 2 months ago
I have read the Warren Commission report on the subsequent inquest. Believe me when I say that Oswald and Oswald alone was responsible for the assassination.
The question that doesnt get answered is who was he working for?
It is quite possible that he was working alone.
It is also possible that he was working for the CIA, but not the Russians or Mafia.
Also has anyone dug his grave up?
which is interesting.......
GeppettoBrett 2 months ago
@GeppettoBrett yeah they dug his grave up in the early 80s and . . . drum roll . . . it was oswald in it. what a surprise. His brother has a court case going because the funeral compnay took the original casket after they exhumed him and auctioned it off.
andrelebaron 2 months ago
@GeppettoBrett Oswalds grave was dug up in 1981 because some person claimed that it was not Oswald in it. But dental records proved it was. What reason were you curious as to to the grave being dug up if i may ask?
shannonm75 2 months ago
@dorisblake Hm. Fair point.
@ngagemydude13 You're a fucking retard. At least come up with some original "secret societies". Let's be honest: how long have the Illumiati been inactive? How many charities have the Freemasons started? And do you even know what the Illuminati stood for? Seriously, read a history book.
drakkoli1 2 months ago 4
Zapruder was a cool guy. Of the money he made after selling the film to Life Magazine (equal to a little over a million dollars - in today's value), he gave $25,000 to the widow of the Dallas cop also shot that day. Decent dude.
pellebravesskylar 2 months ago 2
@pellebravesskylar Well, the stupidest thing he did was to sell it to LIFE. He should have hung onto it - by selling it to them it allowed the conspirators to take possession of the film and alter it.
TheLensSolution 1 month ago
@TheLensSolution He should have made four copies and kept two for himself. Then if any editing was done he had the original to reference it against. But you can't really blame him, those times were different. People trusted government and authority
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
:52 the plume goes up 6 feet in the air. That strongly supports a shot from the rear that bent upward on impact.
DCUPtoejuice 2 months ago
@DCUPtoejuice if it was from behind then why did he get thrown backwards?
cronechach 2 months ago
@cronechach head actually is moving forward a down a bit, you can find nice demonstrations of this by frame analysis and the explosion of right side of skull pushes head leftward after.
DCUPtoejuice 2 months ago
... ILLUMINATE ...FREEMASONS... DONT BELIEVE ME TYPE IN : No secret societies speach JFK ... he knew theyre secret
ngagemydude13 2 months ago
scumbag family.
895prem 2 months ago
@abennett4 No disrespect intended, I merely wish to hear your point of view on the subject.
drakkoli1 2 months ago
@abennett4 You are obvoiusly very well-read on this subject, so let me ask you this: How do you explain the fact that Lee Harvey Oswald was a "below-average sniper" according to his fellow marines, and also when the top Marine Corps sniper was given the same rifle, he could not perform the feat that was performed on that day? Also, please explain why the bullet that they found on JFK's gurney was in pristene condition- no evidence what-so-ever of it ever being fired.
drakkoli1 2 months ago
@drakkoli1 i didn't say that lee harvey oswald for sure killed jfk, i just said there is no way it was the driver. there are a lot of very fishy things about the whole thing but that driver being the shooter thing is really ridiculous to me. you can see both his hands on the steering wheel plus, the way jfk recoils is incongruent with that idea.
dorisblake 2 months ago
@dorisblake You know the driver did't like JFK
TheSagethomas 2 months ago
@TheSagethomas i didn't know the driver didn't like him ... how do we know that? or why didn't he? but still that doesn't mean much. i don't like a lot of people but it doesn't mean i killed them.
dorisblake 2 months ago
this talk about the driver having a gun is retarded.
dorisblake 2 months ago 2
@dorisblake
Yeah because you know you watch the video and yeah... Damn shiny hair on peoples neck when you turn around when have your left hand up to fix that shiny hair on your neck... Oops?
panzeraid 2 months ago
@dorisblake
0:48- 0:53 Didn't happen right comrade? ;D
panzeraid 2 months ago
@dorisblake Yeah I don't see how anyone can actually believe that lol.. Don't you think someone close by would have noticed? They were only surrounded by dozens/hundreds of people...
moguy200979 2 months ago 2
@moguy200979 heheh that's the best plan he could come up with, shoot jfk real quick while trying to drive with the whole country watching. yeah, i don't think so.
dorisblake 2 months ago
watch clearer films and you'll see for sure the driver had a gun and it kicks before he pulls it away,it was a co2 gun with exploding round ...watch jackie try to escape the driver and secret service preventing her
poortogee77 2 months ago
@poortogee77 The ' gun ' was the reflection off the slicked down hair of the passenger sat alongside (Roy Kellerman ?). The 'recoil' is merely the passenger's head lurching forward as the driver brakes. Watch it again and you will see what I mean.
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
@funkmasterjee I see now i agree with you,those grainy films are decieving..thanks for the info
poortogee77 4 weeks ago
search: "doug stanhope - how should i know" regarding strong opinions. i found it interesting
RedStateRoy 2 months ago
murderers
jerzy862 2 months ago
OMFG ive just noticed the driver pulls out something shiny and very eye catching, and holds it over his sholder and people will say how did he know where to aim the gun, i think he looked into the windscreen of the car and lined it up
JdScooterClips 2 months ago
@JdScooterClips
It's not a gun. It's the very shiny hair of the passenger next to him. Trust me I thought it was a gun too but I looked at some brightened images and you can clearly see it's the other dude's shiny ass hair. Bummer.
leelustig 2 months ago
@leelustig bummer? wtf?
JdScooterClips 2 months ago
@JdScooterClips Bummer because a lot of people wish the driver Bill Greer killed him
leelustig 2 months ago
@leelustig i dont wish he killed him i just thought he did
JdScooterClips 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JdScooterClips The ' gun ' was the reflection off the slicked down hair of the passenger sat alongside (Roy Kellerman ?). The 'recoil' is merely the passenger's head lurching forward as the driver brakes. Watch it again and you will see what I mean.
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
overlayes hence the white strippy lines.......
SuperBandstand 2 months ago
did the driver have a gun, or was it the sun reflecting off the person in the passenger sides head ? watch a closeup.
MrCalling4blackup 2 months ago
@MrCalling4blackup
You're right. Not a gun. Shiny hair.
leelustig 2 months ago
@leelustig Shiny hair that some think is a gun. They'll believe what they want to believe but the driver did not have a gun.
shannonm75 2 months ago
Please read "Crossfire the plot that killed Kennedy" by Jim Marrs.
smokinaltima 2 months ago
THE BULLET THAT GOT HIM IN THE NECK --COULD-- HAVE BEEN FIRED FROM BEHIND AND PASSED THREW HIS THROAT OR WHERE EVER,, JUST BECAUSE HE HELD HIS NECK DOSNT MEAN IT CAME FROM THE FRONT BUT I DEF THINK IT WASNT OSWALD --IF-- HE HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT, BUT HE PROB WAS INVOLVED IN SOME WAY,
Flamez201195 2 months ago
its very easy to see the driver with a gun shooting kennedy William cooper was correct.
aacrowley897 2 months ago
@aacrowley897 what kind of hand cannon could the driver have to do that to jfk's head.
DreadLordSkeez 2 months ago
@aacrowley897 Cooper was a fool. He also said that JFK was shot with a pellet containing fish toxin. Why shoot toxin into someone's head when you're blasting away a quarter of their skull with an exploding round ? ...DUMB
funkmasterjee 4 weeks ago
*front of the neck meaning throat
thebigcheese92 2 months ago
The reason he was bent over right before the shot to the head is because he was already shot through the front of the neck indicating more than one shooter. If you look closely you can see Kennedy use both hands in reaching for his throat. Then Jackie leans closer to him because she knew something was wrong. Then the fatal bullet strikes him in the head and it was over. I'm not sure who exactly killed him but I know there had to be more than one shooter.
thebigcheese92 2 months ago
Why was he bending over like in a trance before he was shot? He was obviuosly kind of bent over before the shot... In any case FUCK the US for doing this to the ONLY real president of the USA!!!
ekphotography 2 months ago
I can't tell if frames 208 thru 212 are here, if someone can help confirm?
Nominay 3 months ago