@avedic Thanks for your feedback :) consciousness and mind power is incredible! I'm surprised that so many people haven't uncovered what power they have within!
So you mean... "nothing occurs until a conscious being sees it"... 99% professional scientists don't subscribe to that opinion but that's cool beans, you can believe that if you like.
Just be aware that a whole group of people much smarter than you or I don't believe it.
@astudyofeverything 99% of science is becoming as inflexible as religion. Scientists are terrified of keeping their minds open to alternative ideas, in case their whole framework collapses. They can keep of searching aimlessly for answers, if they enjoy it ... they can keep breaking matter down into smaller bits - but there still needs to be consciousness to observe this, otherwise it doesn't really exist.
I can't response because "my simple point was that the point of anything occuring is for consciousness." is not a sentence. I have no idea what that means.
Your query is simply the old adage... if a tree falls in the forrest, but no one sees it, does it make a sound? Cosmologists assume induction (predictability) of Universe. Just because we can't go back to the age of the dinosaurs, doesn't mean they don't exist, we can infer their existence from secondary evidence (fossils etc). The same goes for the start of the universe - the state of our universe suggests a beginning, we don't need an 'observer' to be there for it to have actually occurred.
@astudyofeverything no, your comparison to dinasours is incorrect because thats a creature that has consciousness of life, and there were other forms of life back then. comparing that to the big bang is a bad comparisson because there were no forms of life to observe it. whats the point of something happening if its never experienced in any way and has no effect on anything?
@astudyofeverything You're saying that dinosaurs exist because there was a raptor that was alive to see it? No consciousness has never 'seen' an electron but we can make supercomputers. In astronomy, there is this little thing called concordance. Many pieces of completely different evidence, pointing to the same conclusion. e.g. Stellar evolution models the CMB, galaxy positions, absorption characteristics in the IGM all simultaneously point to a big bang having occurred. We can't *see* them.
I'm glad there are others that are asking the same questions i ask everyday, The Big Bang did take place, and you’re right, scientist are currently studying this area, trying to work out the reason this singularity started to expand. Einstein's law of general relativity first described what we now know as a black hole, it’s this area that scientist are researching heavily, because every black hole has a single point at its core, a singularity.
But i think that they are looking in the wrong area, if everything we know came from this one singularity, then we must have all been one, everything that as been, is now, and will be in the future, we were all as one. Maybe your missing element is simply consciousness? Everyone has consciousness, and we have always and will always be conscious, consciously observing.
i think we all collectively decided that we wanted to separate from one another, and by choosing this, we started the big bang, pushing away from everything around us, and we have been on this journey ever since, but we will consciously choose to become as one again, the universe will stop expanding at this time and will start to contract, contract back to a singularity, we are fundamentally alone separated, coming back to one is the key to happiness!
Well, you can't really answer those questions because the questionning is basicaly wrong. There is no such thing as matter! There is no universe! Only consciousness. The leap of faith scientists make is that they believe there is a dead universe out there that creates us. Non-sense. What do you imagine when thinking about the universe? Brilliant hot stars, colorful planets, huge galaxies, tiny rocks, empty space... But YOU are the one that gives all of these color, heat, size, bundaries...
... So without a consious observer, by itself, the "raw" universe is completely unformated. No colors, no sounds, no smells, no heat/cold, no sizes, no bondaries, no things, no movement, no time. No-thing exists! For a universe to be, someone must be thinking it into existance. The dead universe is the scientists' God. You can't proove something is out there when no one is there to... approve! Science today lacks a lot of spirituality. I mean, you're alive, that's how weird reality is!
you're beautiful. so my type. and your video is quite interesting. consciousness is the most fascinating thing there is.
avedic 4 weeks ago
@avedic Thanks for your feedback :) consciousness and mind power is incredible! I'm surprised that so many people haven't uncovered what power they have within!
Uncoverself 2 weeks ago
So you mean... "nothing occurs until a conscious being sees it"... 99% professional scientists don't subscribe to that opinion but that's cool beans, you can believe that if you like.
Just be aware that a whole group of people much smarter than you or I don't believe it.
astudyofeverything 3 months ago
@astudyofeverything 99% of science is becoming as inflexible as religion. Scientists are terrified of keeping their minds open to alternative ideas, in case their whole framework collapses. They can keep of searching aimlessly for answers, if they enjoy it ... they can keep breaking matter down into smaller bits - but there still needs to be consciousness to observe this, otherwise it doesn't really exist.
Uncoverself 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I can't response because "my simple point was that the point of anything occuring is for consciousness." is not a sentence. I have no idea what that means.
astudyofeverything 3 months ago
Your query is simply the old adage... if a tree falls in the forrest, but no one sees it, does it make a sound? Cosmologists assume induction (predictability) of Universe. Just because we can't go back to the age of the dinosaurs, doesn't mean they don't exist, we can infer their existence from secondary evidence (fossils etc). The same goes for the start of the universe - the state of our universe suggests a beginning, we don't need an 'observer' to be there for it to have actually occurred.
astudyofeverything 4 months ago
@astudyofeverything no, your comparison to dinasours is incorrect because thats a creature that has consciousness of life, and there were other forms of life back then. comparing that to the big bang is a bad comparisson because there were no forms of life to observe it. whats the point of something happening if its never experienced in any way and has no effect on anything?
TheChriscruse1989 3 months ago
Comment removed
astudyofeverything 3 months ago
@astudyofeverything You're saying that dinosaurs exist because there was a raptor that was alive to see it? No consciousness has never 'seen' an electron but we can make supercomputers. In astronomy, there is this little thing called concordance. Many pieces of completely different evidence, pointing to the same conclusion. e.g. Stellar evolution models the CMB, galaxy positions, absorption characteristics in the IGM all simultaneously point to a big bang having occurred. We can't *see* them.
astudyofeverything 3 months ago
@astudyofeverything wow your lost, my simple point was that the point of anything occuring is for consciousness. what other reason would there be?
TheChriscruse1989 3 months ago
I'm glad there are others that are asking the same questions i ask everyday, The Big Bang did take place, and you’re right, scientist are currently studying this area, trying to work out the reason this singularity started to expand. Einstein's law of general relativity first described what we now know as a black hole, it’s this area that scientist are researching heavily, because every black hole has a single point at its core, a singularity.
joels79newy 5 months ago
But i think that they are looking in the wrong area, if everything we know came from this one singularity, then we must have all been one, everything that as been, is now, and will be in the future, we were all as one. Maybe your missing element is simply consciousness? Everyone has consciousness, and we have always and will always be conscious, consciously observing.
joels79newy 5 months ago
i think we all collectively decided that we wanted to separate from one another, and by choosing this, we started the big bang, pushing away from everything around us, and we have been on this journey ever since, but we will consciously choose to become as one again, the universe will stop expanding at this time and will start to contract, contract back to a singularity, we are fundamentally alone separated, coming back to one is the key to happiness!
joels79newy 5 months ago
Comment removed
Melki 11 months ago
you look tired
ravenvlucht 1 year ago
Well, you can't really answer those questions because the questionning is basicaly wrong. There is no such thing as matter! There is no universe! Only consciousness. The leap of faith scientists make is that they believe there is a dead universe out there that creates us. Non-sense. What do you imagine when thinking about the universe? Brilliant hot stars, colorful planets, huge galaxies, tiny rocks, empty space... But YOU are the one that gives all of these color, heat, size, bundaries...
JayQuebec116 1 year ago
... So without a consious observer, by itself, the "raw" universe is completely unformated. No colors, no sounds, no smells, no heat/cold, no sizes, no bondaries, no things, no movement, no time. No-thing exists! For a universe to be, someone must be thinking it into existance. The dead universe is the scientists' God. You can't proove something is out there when no one is there to... approve! Science today lacks a lot of spirituality. I mean, you're alive, that's how weird reality is!
JayQuebec116 1 year ago
oowww i learn something new today mate
Ashton5TV 1 year ago