One and a half years after this interview Senna rang Stewart to apologise , admitted he had lied and that he DID intentionally smash in to Prost on that first corner in Suzuka.
Jackie had every right to ask the question that no other journo would ask at that time for fear that Senna would not speak with them ever again. He told Stewart just that after this interview. Senna is my favorite driver ever but the question was a valid one and Jackie had every right to ask it .
@thehitchrules true... but he could have been less of an ass... but then again its quite difficult to make a question like that without mentioning "the crash"... so... I guess that wasn't tooooooooooo rude then... mmmh.
It's weird how Senna, whose native language was Portugese, was more articulate and had a greater command of the English language than some British sportsmen. That tit David Beckham makes me cringe everytime he opens his mouth.
Isn't it funny? When senna intentionally crashes into his teammate and he is a hero and "doing what he was born to do" yet when schumacher does it then he is a cheating bastard. lol Now i know why people compare hamilton with him. The only problem is that your not fooling anybody except yourselves because we all know what happened that day.
You can't argue with either of these guys. Neither are right or wrong, Stewart and Senna are legends in their own right, and have got to that status via two different approaches, but that does not make one's achievement greater or lesser than the other.
I get wood every time I listen to this. Senna told it like it is because he was the best. He died because the car was too slow for him...not because the car was too fast.
@thehitchrules If your English is so perfect, please tell me what uncooth means. You fail at life. Please kill yourself. Remember, it's down the road, not across the tracks.
@thehitchrules You use the same punctuation that my 14 year old cousin uses on Facebook. What is ? ! supposed to mean? Oh wait, that must be your perfect English.
stewarts right in many things is racing. but he is a bit of an idiot here. senna did what racing drivers should do best. he was ruthless, but he didn't do what stewart suggests. though senna was an arrogant sod
@Balnazzardi Hans would have made no difference whatsoever because Senna's forehead was pierced in two places by the wheel suspension rods . Plus wheel hitting him full force in the head . A raised cock-pit area like they have today may have saved him but Hans wouldn't have .
@thehitchrules Ah I see...oh well if only the cars of that day had been as safe as they are now =(...Senna still would have had many great years ahead of him
Some people are Idoits Dont you relise the senna and prost crashes senna never did prost couldnt put up with the fact hes not top dog any more he didnt like the fact that some young driver came in to beat him so his only option cheat
Silly question in my view..Senna was born to race.He had one speed..fast.His clashes with Prost were racing incidents,nothing more.He was never reckless as Stewart seems to imply.He was the greatest racing driver of all time.Stewart was good but not good enough to chastise Senna for doing what he was born to do.
@rananim3 Senna is my favorite driver ever but to say he was never reckless is ridiculous . He barged Prost off the track first corner of Suzuka at 150mph in 1990 if you remember . If that isn't reckless then I don't know what is . Pay-back or not he could have kllled or seriously injured himself and/or Prost . He really was no angel on the race track . Amazing, skilled and the fastest there ever was but no angel .
@rananim3 Your being to harsh on Stewart he was as good in my opinion as Senna,Stewart won 3 world titles while racing in Can-am, also racing in touring cars in indy 500 ad le-man and retired while at his peak at the age of 34.And was racing in an era alot more dangerous then the 80s or the 90s that Senna raced in. Also he raced against Jim clark,Graham hill,Niki Lauda,Emerson Fittipaldi and other world champions. So i think he deserves more respect then your giving him.
@rananim3 Sir Jackie Stewart was and is an absoulte legend. He won 27 races out of 99 starts and three WDCs at a time when if you made a mistake, more often than not, you died. To imply Senna is at the same level is absolutely beneath contempt. Sir Jackie Stewart was and is the best of all time. I'd like to see you drive some of the cars Jackie had to contend with, let alone drive them as fast as he did. In 1968, he won a race at the old Nurburgring in the rain, by 4 MINUTES!
@TimBrewin Stewart was a great driver but not quite on the same level as Senna who is regarded by fans and fellow drivers alike as the greatest of all time.Senna never held back,his car control was simply awesome and he made ordinary cars look good.But certainly no disrespect to Stewart who is a top ten driver of all time no doubt.Senna paid for his 110% commitment to race and never back down..with his life.So please dont talk about Stewart's era being more dangerous.RIP Ayrton Senna da Silva.
@rananim3 I don't disagree that Senna's loss was a tragedy. However, Roland Ratzenberger's fatal accident was the first in the sport since the mid 1980s. When Stewart was racing, during 99 starts, the chances of being killed at the wheel of an F1 car were 2 in 3. The odds of surviving a race were 1 in 3. Of course it was more dangerous, you fool.
@TimBrewin Your stats are wrong.That would mean that 66% of F1 drivers died in the 1970's you idiot.Anyway,we're comparing Senna and Stewart.Senna is dead.Stewart is living a comfortable retirement.And no matter what you say,theres no way Stewart was a better driver than Senna.Fangio is his closest rival for all time best.Then Clark.
@rananim3 My stats are not wrong. In the period 1965 - 1973, that's actually what happened in F1. And 27 wins from 99 starts against the likes of Jimmy Clark, Graham Hill, Emmerson Fittipaldi, Jochen Rindt and Nikki Lauda makes Stewart pretty dam good in my book.
@rananim3 If you want a list of F1 fatalites in the period, here goes. Taylor, Bandini, Anderson, Schlesser, Mitte, Courage, Rindt, Siffert, Williamson & Cevert. In Senna's career, 2 other men perished. de Angelis, Ratzenberger and Senna. Which period was more dangerous then? 1984 - 1994, really? pull the other one.
@TimBrewin Thats not 66%.A driver was more likely to be killed in Stewart's era than Senna's.For obvious reasons.What we are trying to establish here though is what right does Stewart have to accuse Senna of recklessness?You cant be reckless and a great driver..thats a contradiction in terms.You can be clinically ruthless and a great driver.And yet he had great compassion and integrity in life but on the track he was ruthless..but never reckless.And thats the difference.Stewart should know that.
@rananim3 Either way, I'm glad you stopped saying F1 was more dangerous in the 90's than the 60's, which you were previously. Stewart has every right to accuse Senna of reckless driving. How many crashes did Senna have which could have been avoided? How many did, for example, Prost have? Prost won 51 races without feeling the need to crash into everyone, unlike Senna. Senna was reckless. Period.
@rananim3 Stewart was ruthless. Senna was reckless. Senna thought nothing of putting a rival off if he couldn't beat him in a fair fight. Stewart would (rightly) have parked up and walked away rather than compromise his integrity. Racers in Stewart's day were fair. Senna, Piquet, Schumacher and Alonso disregarded fairness.
@rananim3 He was reckless and ruthless. Like most racing drivers in that era, they only wanted to win. Schumi was the same, Prost. The list can go on and on. He wanted to win, which is why he took out Prost, and also the reason why Prost took out Senna. They both wanted to win and to guarentee the win, take out your main contender so that mathematically he won't have a chance of winning the championship. I'd do the same, and if the rules were the same now as back then, so would everyone else.
@TimBrewin Oh for fuck's sake! Lighten up you bed wetter. I bet you're the sort of person who writes a letter to the Guardian every week bleating racism, sexism & discrimination.
@whitbyjet65 Actually I don't read any newspaper. I don't like being told what I should believe by anyone, least of all (in the case of the Guardian, or Grauniad as it once spelt it's name) a bunch of left wing knee jerk liberals who think that animals are more important than people.
@TimBrewin Oh the irony of it! You don't like being told what you should believe by anyone but you go around Youtube telling other people what they should & shouldn't think. Oh & you're one of those 'people vs animal' types, are you? You really are a feeble little individual, aren't you?
@whitbyjet65 No I'm not a people vs animal person. Not that it's relevant to this discussion, but I personally think anything that lives has an equal right to inhabit their own part of our planet. Does that really make me feeble? Do one.
And now almost two decades later Steward says the same shit to Lewis. You already got your answers years before now from the great Ayrton, now shut-up and enjoy watching great racers like them drive.
As a diehard Senna fan, this video among others actually made me rethink my opinion about Schumacher. I think Senna would have been among the first to understand and appreciate what the man's been doing in the past two years. "Competing to win," "going for a gap that might no longer exist."
@metatube1 Senna appreciate Shumacher? Don't make me laugh. Senna hated Prost for his ties with the FIA and Shumi is quite famous for using Ferrari and his name. Let's not forget that during his rain at Ferrari the famous motto of FIA=Ferrari International assistance. Senna didn't like plotters and skimmers and Shumi was from the big ones.
well. today, tons of drivers race for a paycheck, instead of trying to be the very best. hes basically saying, if youre not striving to be the best, you shouldnt be driving. noone should stand in your way in being the best you can be
Both of them are right. As Senna said, ou should go for a gap and try to overtake as many cars as possible, because your objective is to win. That's the true spirit of racing. But, for Jackie point of view, you should also respect the other drivers, while caring for your life and their lives. At that time, F1 was much dangerous than it is today. It's hard to find a balance between safety and aggression, so both of them are right.
Stewart has done more for F1 safety than anyone else ever. So for all his hard work on track & car safety, now he see's drivers intentionally crashing into eachother...
I wonder if Senna would have had the balls to do a "suzuka 90" in Jackie Stewarts era.... no fucking way he would have, because people in Jackies era would get killed for being stupid like senna!
@ProudConfederateSon If you seriously think Senna "owned" Sir Jackie Stewart here you need to stop jerking off over Senna and watch F1 as a whole instead of watching 1 man!
@Tyler83Mr Trust me Jackie was not 'just' a driver. He was the class driver of his era, winning 3 WDCs. Anyone who knows anything about formula knows that Jackie Stewart was not 'just a great driver'. Do your homework.
@flipsidedogchop Oh i get it. Senna said this after intentionaly crashing into prost at japan 1990. It was a silly excuse to justify his disgusting driving. You're taking something that senna said and twisting it to suit your arguement in favour of lewis. Senna never said that a driver has to go for EVERY single gap to be considered a racing driver which is what your trying to say. He doesn't say that most likely because no driver goes for every single gap.
It is very obvious to anyone who was actually watching F1 at the time that Jackie Stewart was biased against Senna and favored Prost. It is funny how Stewart poses this question to Senna, but never asked such a question to Prost who intentionally crashed into Senna at Suzuka in 1989. In any case Senna's answer is awesome, he remains totally calm and puts Stewart in his place telling him if you do not go for a gap you are not a racer. Give me a guy like Senna over Stewart (or Prost) anytime.
I am a fan of Senna but he gets on like a prick here. he knew he was in the wrong and calling JS 'Stewart' just because he's touched a nerve was a tad rude. let's not forget he could easily have killed Prost or a spectator with his driving in the 90 Japanese GP, if things had gone slightly wrong.
At 0:26 he does not look impressed! His response was truly epic, this man inspires me so much. His speeches/quotes have so much depth....he truly is one of a kind. The greatest driver EVER in Formula One! R.I.P. Ayrton x
@steviegbcool Of course he has depth, he knew what it took to be the best and always thought deeply about everything he did - he had passion and intelligence. When I said 'depth' before, I wasn't just referring to this interview, I meant more generally.
Is everyone fucking stupid? I liked Ayrton but he admitted a year later to intentionally driving into Alain....So in case any of you fucking retards dont get it, Jackie was right to front him about it! Ayrton knew he couldnt admit to it just a few weeks after the incident so he lied through his back teeth rambling on about " if you no longer go for a gap, you no longer racing driver".
He might fool the "new age" F1 fans & the Ayrton Senna fan club.... but not me!
@flipsidedogchop haha. immature young fuck who wasn't there.... if u were there for a second , u would know during the early '90( presemi gearbox) Senna was unequaled in the history of F1.
Senna,Montoya,Hamilton and other aggressive racers who speak their mind and keep us entertained will always be labelled as a "danger to other drivers" and hated & criticized by the media & by the likes of Jackie Stewart, Mansell or Lauda. True fans of F1 know that Montoya was as good or even better than Schumacher, but we´ll never know coz he never had the car and the FIA made sure he didn´t win in 2003 like he would have without the stewards intervention. /watch?v=RAaBiLauXxQ&feature=related
How anyone here would not understand the complete common sense from were Senna is speaking from here make makes me realise how many stupid people there are. U take the risk, that;s racing, theres a Gap, you try to push through cos you want to win, yes? Although agressive and a little crazy, he never did anything that wasn't acceptable. You either go for it or you dont, how the fuck else are you supposed to get passed! that's the risk. What he did was what made him superior to any driver, ever.
@forzaazzurino1 what made him superior is the same thing that maked all other sports stars, movie actors , musicans ,rock starts ect Superior, die in their prime.
Delibiratly Crashing into Prost at a 170mph risking Death and injury to others seemed pretty unaceptable to a lot of people.
Stewart was as successful as Senna in his era, the class of his generation, yet he didn't had an over agressive style that involved him in many collisions. Stewart is telling a FACT to Ayrton, and sadly Ayrton's only answer is "i have won a lot, i am champion". J. Stewart was giving Senna a warning, and if Ayrton had listened to him more, he would be alive today.
You're right, a failed steering column was caused by his over agressive driving. Don't let the fact that his crash was more or less a "perfect storm" of events that lead to his dead. The angle that he hit the wall and where the debris hit him.
@BiscuitMcgriddleson Dude, the steering column didn't fail. The telemetry showed that the steering was working right up to the impact. The reason he crashed so fatally was either because he ran over debris on the track left from an accident, or because of the safety car his tyres lost temperature, the ride height of the car lowered significantly and the bottom scraped the track for a split second, enough for the back end to flick out. He steered into it, quite rightly, and went off the track.
@longde Not true. Jackie was thinking of his friend Prost. Ayrton is telling a FACT to JS. He is a racer. You have taken from this interview what you choose. Not the facts. Listen again you will hear the facts.
@longde Rubbish, and oversiplified. Senna's deadly crash had nothing to do with an aggressive driving style, it was a non-driver failure on a fairly straightforward (but fast) corner. Stewart had to ask him the tough question, and Senna's response was EPIC.
@longde Senna is telling Stewart his own approach to racing it is as simple as that. In the end Senna accomplished far more (wins, poles, etc.) than Stewart did in F1 and Senna was definitely the class of his generation and the best of all time. It is utter and complete nonsense to say that had Senna "listened" to him he would be alive today ... his death had nothing to do with contact of another driver. Get a clue.
@Senna458 What a ridiculous analogy, to compare Senna's career to Stewart's. Jackie raced in an era where two fatalities a year were not uncommon, cars were unreliable, and there were fewer races to compete in. Don't compare Jackie with Ayrton. They are both legends of their own respective era's and should be recognised as such.
@sodazman Nothing proven . LIKELY to have been a broken component. Senna was known for pushing beyond the limit, for his aggressive style and his iron-will to win. Stewart saw many of his contemporaries die on a race-track. Different drivers, different era but Stewart has every right to question Ayrton and Ayrton was defensive because this is just after he smashed in to Prost deliberately at 170 mph .
@longde the accident that killed Senna was not caused by any contact with another driver. Any F1 driver is in danger by racing at those high speeds. Sorry, I don't agree with your statement.
@longde " J. Stewart was giving Senna a warning, and if Ayrton had listened to him more, he would be alive today." What a stupid comment is this!!!!!! Senna died because his fkn car was damaged and not because of his style of driving a car. Senna is more than just a Legend, he is the best ever.
I like how Senna has absolutely no hesitation in questioning Stewart's question's relevance. Stewart must've been ashamed at hearing such true words being spoken in answer to his question. And Senna is SO charismatic, it's unreal.
@hugolafhugolaf I'm a massive fan of Senna but Stewart has nothing to feel ashamed about .In Jackie Stewart'sday driving like Senna meant death, that's the bottom line.Jackie is a champion not only as driver but also for pushing for for safety measures in the sport. Stewart lost MANY friends who were killed racing and experienced the fall-out.Senna was a game changer but Stewart deserves some respect and Senna was v.defensive because this came after the dreadful he pulled on Prost at Suzuka.
At the time this interview took place, Jackie Stewart was acting as nothing less than Jean-Marie Balestre's political henchman. The FIA threw all of it's support behind Alain Prost and set out on a campaign to discredit Senna as a driver and a person. Balestre used Stewart's legitimate desire to improve F1 safety as a way to sandbag Senna in an interview. It was a sad display that reveals the shady underbelly of Formula 1 racing. Not too unlike what has gone on with Lewis Hamilton recently.
Formula One has always been a dangerous sport, dangerous for the aggressive drivers and dangerous for the less aggressive and all know the field they play on! All the safety measures in today's modern race format will not stop crashes because of the limitless amount of variables to be factored into the grand scheme of things. I have the greatest amount of respect for Senna because he was capable of pulling off spectacular driving that only few were capable of. He drove to win...period!
Sometimes you get it wrong? No one was faster than Senna,to be sure, but Jackie Stewart has got a point about the crashing.. The same can be said for Schumacher.
As for who's 'the best", i'm not going to argue with F1 pilots themselves, who last year voted guess-who as the best of all time ;)
Which does not make Fangio or Stewart less great, just more forgotten. In 10 years Schumacher will be The Greatest and Senna will be "the one who died". But not for me.
@martytc afaik, senna was disqualified for shortcutting chikane, not for a push-start. this penalty was not often applied, but for him an exception was made. so he felt that he was denied a chance to win the championship, and again, in this race, despite senna's pole position, prost had a better placement on the grid. i don't want to sound like what senna did was justified, but i know for myself, when you are enraged for being treated unfairly, you may make ugly and stupid things.
Anyone who talks about how Schumi was a "bad guy" for whatever action needs to take a closer look at this vid. All top-level drivers are ruthlessly competitive, because if they're not, the person slipstreaming to pass them is. Some of them have been smoother, and have likely gotten away with more, but to think they weren't pushing the limits of the technical and the legal is naive.
@steviegbcool Comment has nothing to do with Prost. If you'd followed F1 you'd know that Senna crashed into Prost because Jean-Marie Balestre the president of the FIA vetoed the decision of the race director who allowed Senna to start the 1990 race at Suzuka from pole on the clean side of the track. Balestre in a bid to help Prost win the title moved pole back to the dirty side. You should rethink your comment given the fact that Prost deliberately crashed into Senna at the chicane in 1989.
@steviegbcool He did indeed, just as Prost purposely crashed into him the previous year. By your logic, had Senna died in 1989 Prost would have been held for manslaughter. So what is your point? Prost crashed into Senna to win the title, a dirty tactic without question. Senna crashed into Prost because he was being treated unfairly by the FIA president whom Prost was manipulating to gain an advantage he could not gain through skill and talent. You cannot condemn Senna and absolve Prost mate.
@Senna458 1. Prost said He didn't Crash on purpose and a lot of people believe him,
2. Even if it was on purpose you are not really risking another persons life crashing at 35mph At 160mph you very much are, That day Senna was the luckiest man alive.
@hamishdipp I have to disagree....Senna had way more personality and depth, Hamilton, to me, is petulant and makes stupid errors. He never admits to his mistakes, and instead blames other people. Senna stood for his beliefs and when he was wrong he admitted it. Hamilton.....blah......not a fan tbh. In my opinion t
Senna OWNED HIM
hahahomi 1 day ago
One and a half years after this interview Senna rang Stewart to apologise , admitted he had lied and that he DID intentionally smash in to Prost on that first corner in Suzuka.
Jackie had every right to ask the question that no other journo would ask at that time for fear that Senna would not speak with them ever again. He told Stewart just that after this interview. Senna is my favorite driver ever but the question was a valid one and Jackie had every right to ask it .
thehitchrules 3 days ago
@thehitchrules true... but he could have been less of an ass... but then again its quite difficult to make a question like that without mentioning "the crash"... so... I guess that wasn't tooooooooooo rude then... mmmh.
ChuckNorrisOfF1 3 hours ago
It's weird how Senna, whose native language was Portugese, was more articulate and had a greater command of the English language than some British sportsmen. That tit David Beckham makes me cringe everytime he opens his mouth.
TheBlimp888 4 days ago
"If you no longer go for a gap that exists, you are no longer a racing driver." Great quote and very true. R.I.P.
chunkyscotty 1 week ago
R.I.P.
95m26 2 weeks ago
If you no longer go for a gap that exists, you're no longer a racing drive - Ayrton Senna
20827722 3 weeks ago
"I race, designed to win"...truer words have never been spoken! RIP AYRTON, #1 OF F1 FOREVER
22astonmartin 4 weeks ago
Isn't it funny? When senna intentionally crashes into his teammate and he is a hero and "doing what he was born to do" yet when schumacher does it then he is a cheating bastard. lol Now i know why people compare hamilton with him. The only problem is that your not fooling anybody except yourselves because we all know what happened that day.
aieljose 4 weeks ago
You can't argue with either of these guys. Neither are right or wrong, Stewart and Senna are legends in their own right, and have got to that status via two different approaches, but that does not make one's achievement greater or lesser than the other.
xUNKNOWNSH4DOWx 1 month ago
THE SENNA FILM IS NOW ON NETFLIX AND ITUNES
22astonmartin 1 month ago
Steward is an Asshole !
0000Lance0000 1 month ago
I get wood every time I listen to this. Senna told it like it is because he was the best. He died because the car was too slow for him...not because the car was too fast.
natestarider 1 month ago in playlist Ayrton Senna - Entrevistas (Interviews)
@natestarider Too much information and very uncooth .
thehitchrules 1 month ago
@thehitchrules Un what? Try learning English before you post something.
natestarider 1 month ago
@natestarider My English is perfect thank you very much . Yours on the other hand ...? !
thehitchrules 1 month ago
@thehitchrules If your English is so perfect, please tell me what uncooth means. You fail at life. Please kill yourself. Remember, it's down the road, not across the tracks.
natestarider 1 month ago
@natestarider Priceless . I have to say it you sound like a complete prick .
thehitchrules 1 month ago
@thehitchrules Just count this as a loss and move on. Like I said before, you fail at life. Go find a shoulder to cry on.
natestarider 1 month ago
@natestarider Brilliant !! You're on fire aren't you ? !
thehitchrules 1 month ago
@thehitchrules You use the same punctuation that my 14 year old cousin uses on Facebook. What is ? ! supposed to mean? Oh wait, that must be your perfect English.
natestarider 1 month ago
stewarts right in many things is racing. but he is a bit of an idiot here. senna did what racing drivers should do best. he was ruthless, but he didn't do what stewart suggests. though senna was an arrogant sod
jblegend1000 1 month ago
I love Jackie Stewart but he gets owned by senna here.
provibesprint 1 month ago 2
Is it me or is Senna the only person that made Stewart sound like an Idiot...?
ChuckNorrisOfF1 2 months ago 2
@ChuckNorrisOfF1 It's you . Stewart most definitely not an idiot . You on the other hand ..... ?
thehitchrules 1 month ago
@thehitchrules at what point did I say he IS an idiot...?
ChuckNorrisOfF1 1 month ago
@ChuckNorrisOfF1 Fuck off you tit .
thehitchrules 1 month ago
@thehitchrules ...um? okay then...? I was just saying that stewart's question was very stupid for he's standard, and Senna's response was epic.
ChuckNorrisOfF1 1 month ago
Senna could have accomplished so much more in F1....if only F1 had the HANS device back then, Ayrton would most likely still live =(
Balnazzardi 2 months ago 2
@Balnazzardi Hans would have made no difference whatsoever because Senna's forehead was pierced in two places by the wheel suspension rods . Plus wheel hitting him full force in the head . A raised cock-pit area like they have today may have saved him but Hans wouldn't have .
thehitchrules 1 month ago 3
@thehitchrules Ah I see...oh well if only the cars of that day had been as safe as they are now =(...Senna still would have had many great years ahead of him
Balnazzardi 1 month ago
running drivers off the track is not the way too win. he was a great driver but he should of handled things differently on the track.
refleXstarr 2 months ago
Jackie, need some ice for that burn???
ryang5598 2 months ago 3
Sizzzzzled!!!!! Jackie wa
ryang5598 2 months ago
the best definition of racing !
2aloos 2 months ago 2
Love U Ayrton!!!!
RYnMZ 2 months ago
ayrton was so COOL and yet so HOT!! the rest just bullshit.
alynadance 2 months ago 8
@alynadance ...amen to that!
22astonmartin 2 months ago
"I race, designed to win"... thats why he's the best f1 driver of all times.
xLordKakashi 2 months ago
0:13 Incident face… wtf seriously
Vyny92vsTheWarrior73 2 months ago
Stewart was a very good driver, but senna was... amazing^^ and faster^^
MEDEIROSJR007 2 months ago
My favourite Senna quote: "If you no longer go for a gap, then you're no longer a racing driver"
insimonia1990 2 months ago
@insimonia1990 And my favorite Senna quote is - " I race, designed to win " . !!
thehitchrules 2 months ago
this is why Senna is #1. he goes for the win, no matter what
IMS181 3 months ago 2
This is not golf it is motor racing. Thus, I want to see drivers take risks and go for a win. And not processions and polite “after you, sir”.
RYnMZ 3 months ago
Stewart ist absolutely right :)
husky2202 3 months ago
@husky2202 only in your fucking small poor world.
Tyler83Mr 3 months ago
Some people are Idoits Dont you relise the senna and prost crashes senna never did prost couldnt put up with the fact hes not top dog any more he didnt like the fact that some young driver came in to beat him so his only option cheat
MWRTGaming 3 months ago
Silly question in my view..Senna was born to race.He had one speed..fast.His clashes with Prost were racing incidents,nothing more.He was never reckless as Stewart seems to imply.He was the greatest racing driver of all time.Stewart was good but not good enough to chastise Senna for doing what he was born to do.
rananim3 3 months ago 20
@rananim3 Senna is my favorite driver ever but to say he was never reckless is ridiculous . He barged Prost off the track first corner of Suzuka at 150mph in 1990 if you remember . If that isn't reckless then I don't know what is . Pay-back or not he could have kllled or seriously injured himself and/or Prost . He really was no angel on the race track . Amazing, skilled and the fastest there ever was but no angel .
thehitchrules 2 months ago
@rananim3 Your being to harsh on Stewart he was as good in my opinion as Senna,Stewart won 3 world titles while racing in Can-am, also racing in touring cars in indy 500 ad le-man and retired while at his peak at the age of 34.And was racing in an era alot more dangerous then the 80s or the 90s that Senna raced in. Also he raced against Jim clark,Graham hill,Niki Lauda,Emerson Fittipaldi and other world champions. So i think he deserves more respect then your giving him.
TheLloydA1 2 months ago
Senna was one of the greatest,but certainly not THE greatest.
Ungeziefer23 1 month ago
@rananim3 Sir Jackie Stewart was and is an absoulte legend. He won 27 races out of 99 starts and three WDCs at a time when if you made a mistake, more often than not, you died. To imply Senna is at the same level is absolutely beneath contempt. Sir Jackie Stewart was and is the best of all time. I'd like to see you drive some of the cars Jackie had to contend with, let alone drive them as fast as he did. In 1968, he won a race at the old Nurburgring in the rain, by 4 MINUTES!
TimBrewin 1 month ago
@TimBrewin Stewart was a great driver but not quite on the same level as Senna who is regarded by fans and fellow drivers alike as the greatest of all time.Senna never held back,his car control was simply awesome and he made ordinary cars look good.But certainly no disrespect to Stewart who is a top ten driver of all time no doubt.Senna paid for his 110% commitment to race and never back down..with his life.So please dont talk about Stewart's era being more dangerous.RIP Ayrton Senna da Silva.
rananim3 1 month ago
@rananim3 I don't disagree that Senna's loss was a tragedy. However, Roland Ratzenberger's fatal accident was the first in the sport since the mid 1980s. When Stewart was racing, during 99 starts, the chances of being killed at the wheel of an F1 car were 2 in 3. The odds of surviving a race were 1 in 3. Of course it was more dangerous, you fool.
TimBrewin 1 month ago
@TimBrewin Your stats are wrong.That would mean that 66% of F1 drivers died in the 1970's you idiot.Anyway,we're comparing Senna and Stewart.Senna is dead.Stewart is living a comfortable retirement.And no matter what you say,theres no way Stewart was a better driver than Senna.Fangio is his closest rival for all time best.Then Clark.
rananim3 1 month ago
@rananim3 My stats are not wrong. In the period 1965 - 1973, that's actually what happened in F1. And 27 wins from 99 starts against the likes of Jimmy Clark, Graham Hill, Emmerson Fittipaldi, Jochen Rindt and Nikki Lauda makes Stewart pretty dam good in my book.
TimBrewin 1 month ago
@rananim3 If you want a list of F1 fatalites in the period, here goes. Taylor, Bandini, Anderson, Schlesser, Mitte, Courage, Rindt, Siffert, Williamson & Cevert. In Senna's career, 2 other men perished. de Angelis, Ratzenberger and Senna. Which period was more dangerous then? 1984 - 1994, really? pull the other one.
TimBrewin 1 month ago
@TimBrewin Thats not 66%.A driver was more likely to be killed in Stewart's era than Senna's.For obvious reasons.What we are trying to establish here though is what right does Stewart have to accuse Senna of recklessness?You cant be reckless and a great driver..thats a contradiction in terms.You can be clinically ruthless and a great driver.And yet he had great compassion and integrity in life but on the track he was ruthless..but never reckless.And thats the difference.Stewart should know that.
rananim3 1 month ago
@rananim3 Either way, I'm glad you stopped saying F1 was more dangerous in the 90's than the 60's, which you were previously. Stewart has every right to accuse Senna of reckless driving. How many crashes did Senna have which could have been avoided? How many did, for example, Prost have? Prost won 51 races without feeling the need to crash into everyone, unlike Senna. Senna was reckless. Period.
TimBrewin 1 month ago
@rananim3 Stewart was ruthless. Senna was reckless. Senna thought nothing of putting a rival off if he couldn't beat him in a fair fight. Stewart would (rightly) have parked up and walked away rather than compromise his integrity. Racers in Stewart's day were fair. Senna, Piquet, Schumacher and Alonso disregarded fairness.
TimBrewin 1 month ago
@rananim3 No answer to the stats then? :-)
TimBrewin 1 month ago
@rananim3 He was reckless and ruthless. Like most racing drivers in that era, they only wanted to win. Schumi was the same, Prost. The list can go on and on. He wanted to win, which is why he took out Prost, and also the reason why Prost took out Senna. They both wanted to win and to guarentee the win, take out your main contender so that mathematically he won't have a chance of winning the championship. I'd do the same, and if the rules were the same now as back then, so would everyone else.
Pistola84 1 month ago
Senna was the best ever. I've never liked Stewart, the pompous, tweed wearing broth guzzling Scottish twat.
whitbyjet65 3 months ago
@whitbyjet65
Nobody who knows what Jackie Stewart actually did with his career calls him a twat. You're just under informed :P
dienkonig33 3 months ago
@dienkonig33 I know exactly what Stewart did. That doesn't mean I have to like him.
whitbyjet65 3 months ago
@whitbyjet65 So no ignorant prejudice there then? I love an open mind...
TimBrewin 1 month ago
@TimBrewin Oh so suddenly having an open mind means having no strong opinions, does it? Strange world you live in, there.
whitbyjet65 1 month ago
@whitbyjet65 No it means accepting that not all Scottish people (to take your example) are pompous, wear tweed or eat broth.
TimBrewin 1 month ago
@TimBrewin Oh for fuck's sake! Lighten up you bed wetter. I bet you're the sort of person who writes a letter to the Guardian every week bleating racism, sexism & discrimination.
whitbyjet65 1 month ago
@whitbyjet65 Actually I don't read any newspaper. I don't like being told what I should believe by anyone, least of all (in the case of the Guardian, or Grauniad as it once spelt it's name) a bunch of left wing knee jerk liberals who think that animals are more important than people.
TimBrewin 1 month ago
@TimBrewin Oh the irony of it! You don't like being told what you should believe by anyone but you go around Youtube telling other people what they should & shouldn't think. Oh & you're one of those 'people vs animal' types, are you? You really are a feeble little individual, aren't you?
whitbyjet65 1 month ago
@whitbyjet65 No I'm not a people vs animal person. Not that it's relevant to this discussion, but I personally think anything that lives has an equal right to inhabit their own part of our planet. Does that really make me feeble? Do one.
TimBrewin 1 month ago
0:43 - 1:01 - NOT BLINKING! - best concentration....
R.I.P. from Ukraine
denreal 3 months ago
And now almost two decades later Steward says the same shit to Lewis. You already got your answers years before now from the great Ayrton, now shut-up and enjoy watching great racers like them drive.
SIPEROTH 3 months ago 4
Thats tellin him, Ayrton, lol.
I8ASUPRAforLUNCH 3 months ago
As a diehard Senna fan, this video among others actually made me rethink my opinion about Schumacher. I think Senna would have been among the first to understand and appreciate what the man's been doing in the past two years. "Competing to win," "going for a gap that might no longer exist."
Two greats cut out of the same cloth.
metatube1 3 months ago
@metatube1 Senna appreciate Shumacher? Don't make me laugh. Senna hated Prost for his ties with the FIA and Shumi is quite famous for using Ferrari and his name. Let's not forget that during his rain at Ferrari the famous motto of FIA=Ferrari International assistance. Senna didn't like plotters and skimmers and Shumi was from the big ones.
SIPEROTH 3 months ago
well. today, tons of drivers race for a paycheck, instead of trying to be the very best. hes basically saying, if youre not striving to be the best, you shouldnt be driving. noone should stand in your way in being the best you can be
Slidingmy240sx 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Both of them are right. As Senna said, ou should go for a gap and try to overtake as many cars as possible, because your objective is to win. That's the true spirit of racing. But, for Jackie point of view, you should also respect the other drivers, while caring for your life and their lives. At that time, F1 was much dangerous than it is today. It's hard to find a balance between safety and aggression, so both of them are right.
Paellain 4 months ago
Comment removed
Paellain 4 months ago
Lewis to a tea
skaterlukeH 4 months ago
@skaterlukeH Similar helmets but thats about it...
gnarkillkicksass 4 months ago
@gnarkillkicksass ....How you work that out?
skaterlukeH 4 months ago
dissssssssssssssss
ryang5598 4 months ago in playlist ryang5598's Favorited Videos
Stewart has done more for F1 safety than anyone else ever. So for all his hard work on track & car safety, now he see's drivers intentionally crashing into eachother...
I wonder if Senna would have had the balls to do a "suzuka 90" in Jackie Stewarts era.... no fucking way he would have, because people in Jackies era would get killed for being stupid like senna!
flipsidedogchop 4 months ago
How many people could ever OWN Stewart ... Well Senna sure did. RIP Hero
ProudConfederateSon 4 months ago 3
@ProudConfederateSon If you seriously think Senna "owned" Sir Jackie Stewart here you need to stop jerking off over Senna and watch F1 as a whole instead of watching 1 man!
flipsidedogchop 4 months ago
@ProudConfederateSon
He did? When? Oh you mean OWN PROST into a wall? Oh yeah i see… :O
Vyny92vsTheWarrior73 2 months ago
@Vyny92vsTheWarrior73
R.i.p tho
Vyny92vsTheWarrior73 2 months ago
Jackie has just said the same thing to Hamilton(Singapure 2011 GP)
Senna is probably the greatest of all time, Jackie ... just a great driver ! Who is right ?
Tyler83Mr 4 months ago
@Tyler83Mr Trust me Jackie was not 'just' a driver. He was the class driver of his era, winning 3 WDCs. Anyone who knows anything about formula knows that Jackie Stewart was not 'just a great driver'. Do your homework.
thehitchrules 4 months ago 2
If you no longer go for gap you no longer racing driver?
So that means lewis hamilton had an excellent monaco 2011, then!
flipsidedogchop 4 months ago
@flipsidedogchop Of course! Being involved in multiple collisions in a single race is something that all drivers aspire to achieve.
aieljose 4 months ago
@aieljose well like Senna said, if you no longer go for a gap, you no longer racing driver
So now everyone must go for every single little gap they ever see or they are not a racing driver!
flipsidedogchop 4 months ago
@flipsidedogchop I guess lewis isn't a racing driver then.
aieljose 4 months ago
@aieljose Huh???
Dont you get it? Lewis went for every single little gap possible, so according to Senna, he's the ONLY racing driver!
flipsidedogchop 4 months ago
@flipsidedogchop Oh i get it. Senna said this after intentionaly crashing into prost at japan 1990. It was a silly excuse to justify his disgusting driving. You're taking something that senna said and twisting it to suit your arguement in favour of lewis. Senna never said that a driver has to go for EVERY single gap to be considered a racing driver which is what your trying to say. He doesn't say that most likely because no driver goes for every single gap.
aieljose 4 months ago
It is very obvious to anyone who was actually watching F1 at the time that Jackie Stewart was biased against Senna and favored Prost. It is funny how Stewart poses this question to Senna, but never asked such a question to Prost who intentionally crashed into Senna at Suzuka in 1989. In any case Senna's answer is awesome, he remains totally calm and puts Stewart in his place telling him if you do not go for a gap you are not a racer. Give me a guy like Senna over Stewart (or Prost) anytime.
Senna458 4 months ago 3
@Senna458 you mean a guy with no respect for human life?
steviegbcool 3 months ago
I am a fan of Senna but he gets on like a prick here. he knew he was in the wrong and calling JS 'Stewart' just because he's touched a nerve was a tad rude. let's not forget he could easily have killed Prost or a spectator with his driving in the 90 Japanese GP, if things had gone slightly wrong.
ReverendFrogF1 4 months ago
At 0:26 he does not look impressed! His response was truly epic, this man inspires me so much. His speeches/quotes have so much depth....he truly is one of a kind. The greatest driver EVER in Formula One! R.I.P. Ayrton x
TheRoxy6 4 months ago
@TheRoxy6 depth? lol , it was a blanket statment that that doesn't address the issue or even make sense.
steviegbcool 3 months ago
@steviegbcool Of course he has depth, he knew what it took to be the best and always thought deeply about everything he did - he had passion and intelligence. When I said 'depth' before, I wasn't just referring to this interview, I meant more generally.
TheRoxy6 3 months ago
Simply the best and the guy who was being racist about hamilton below i would like to break your neck
380dm1 4 months ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Lewis Hamilton is a nigger faggot.
UberLifeTroll 4 months ago
@UberLifeTroll And you're a racist low-life . You little turd.
thehitchrules 4 months ago 9
@UberLifeTroll I'm not a fan of Hamilton......but that comment was just harsh.
TheRoxy6 4 months ago
he believed he could walk on water, and many times he did.... I still mourn him..
alexaadap 4 months ago
Is everyone fucking stupid? I liked Ayrton but he admitted a year later to intentionally driving into Alain....So in case any of you fucking retards dont get it, Jackie was right to front him about it! Ayrton knew he couldnt admit to it just a few weeks after the incident so he lied through his back teeth rambling on about " if you no longer go for a gap, you no longer racing driver".
He might fool the "new age" F1 fans & the Ayrton Senna fan club.... but not me!
flipsidedogchop 4 months ago
@flipsidedogchop haha. immature young fuck who wasn't there.... if u were there for a second , u would know during the early '90( presemi gearbox) Senna was unequaled in the history of F1.
gotherealex 4 months ago
@gotherealex what the fuck has that got to do with this video?!
flipsidedogchop 4 months ago
Senna,Montoya,Hamilton and other aggressive racers who speak their mind and keep us entertained will always be labelled as a "danger to other drivers" and hated & criticized by the media & by the likes of Jackie Stewart, Mansell or Lauda. True fans of F1 know that Montoya was as good or even better than Schumacher, but we´ll never know coz he never had the car and the FIA made sure he didn´t win in 2003 like he would have without the stewards intervention. /watch?v=RAaBiLauXxQ&feature=related
Euclides287 4 months ago 2
@Euclides287 lol whatever, Montoya was Matched by Ralf Shumacher and beaten By Raikonen so he quit
steviegbcool 3 months ago
How anyone here would not understand the complete common sense from were Senna is speaking from here make makes me realise how many stupid people there are. U take the risk, that;s racing, theres a Gap, you try to push through cos you want to win, yes? Although agressive and a little crazy, he never did anything that wasn't acceptable. You either go for it or you dont, how the fuck else are you supposed to get passed! that's the risk. What he did was what made him superior to any driver, ever.
forzaazzurino1 4 months ago 2
@forzaazzurino1 what made him superior is the same thing that maked all other sports stars, movie actors , musicans ,rock starts ect Superior, die in their prime.
Delibiratly Crashing into Prost at a 170mph risking Death and injury to others seemed pretty unaceptable to a lot of people.
steviegbcool 3 months ago
Where is the full footage of this interview please. Do you have it and/or link to it, please. Great extrait, all the same. Thx.
culturehorse 5 months ago
i love ayrton senna i truly believe we are kindred spirits and brothers from another mother
blackflagqwerty 5 months ago
@blackflagqwerty Then you need psychiatric help.
thehitchrules 5 months ago
Stewart was as successful as Senna in his era, the class of his generation, yet he didn't had an over agressive style that involved him in many collisions. Stewart is telling a FACT to Ayrton, and sadly Ayrton's only answer is "i have won a lot, i am champion". J. Stewart was giving Senna a warning, and if Ayrton had listened to him more, he would be alive today.
longde 5 months ago 3
@longde Agree. I love Senna but he was way too defensive in his response and he should have showed Stewart some respect .
thehitchrules 5 months ago
@longde
You're right, a failed steering column was caused by his over agressive driving. Don't let the fact that his crash was more or less a "perfect storm" of events that lead to his dead. The angle that he hit the wall and where the debris hit him.
BiscuitMcgriddleson 5 months ago 2
@BiscuitMcgriddleson Dude, the steering column didn't fail. The telemetry showed that the steering was working right up to the impact. The reason he crashed so fatally was either because he ran over debris on the track left from an accident, or because of the safety car his tyres lost temperature, the ride height of the car lowered significantly and the bottom scraped the track for a split second, enough for the back end to flick out. He steered into it, quite rightly, and went off the track.
TheRoxy6 4 months ago
@longde Not true. Jackie was thinking of his friend Prost. Ayrton is telling a FACT to JS. He is a racer. You have taken from this interview what you choose. Not the facts. Listen again you will hear the facts.
the1truebeliever 4 months ago 3
@longde Rubbish, and oversiplified. Senna's deadly crash had nothing to do with an aggressive driving style, it was a non-driver failure on a fairly straightforward (but fast) corner. Stewart had to ask him the tough question, and Senna's response was EPIC.
FormulaKimball 4 months ago
@longde he says he races to win, he never talks about his own personal successes
tangywangyify 4 months ago 2
@longde brave thing to say considering the fact that you don't know what killed him.
ChuckNorrisOfF1 4 months ago 2
@longde Senna is telling Stewart his own approach to racing it is as simple as that. In the end Senna accomplished far more (wins, poles, etc.) than Stewart did in F1 and Senna was definitely the class of his generation and the best of all time. It is utter and complete nonsense to say that had Senna "listened" to him he would be alive today ... his death had nothing to do with contact of another driver. Get a clue.
Senna458 4 months ago 13
@Senna458 What a ridiculous analogy, to compare Senna's career to Stewart's. Jackie raced in an era where two fatalities a year were not uncommon, cars were unreliable, and there were fewer races to compete in. Don't compare Jackie with Ayrton. They are both legends of their own respective era's and should be recognised as such.
ROONTANG 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ROONTANG Try reading the post in the context that it was written in and you might have a clue as to what my point was.
Senna458 2 months ago
@longde His death had nothing to do with his driving style. It was related to a failed component in his car.
sodazman 4 months ago 2
@sodazman Nothing proven . LIKELY to have been a broken component. Senna was known for pushing beyond the limit, for his aggressive style and his iron-will to win. Stewart saw many of his contemporaries die on a race-track. Different drivers, different era but Stewart has every right to question Ayrton and Ayrton was defensive because this is just after he smashed in to Prost deliberately at 170 mph .
thehitchrules 4 months ago
@longde the accident that killed Senna was not caused by any contact with another driver. Any F1 driver is in danger by racing at those high speeds. Sorry, I don't agree with your statement.
roshiro 4 months ago
@longde how would he have he still crashed into a wall threw no fault of his own
TheMonsterCable 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@longde " J. Stewart was giving Senna a warning, and if Ayrton had listened to him more, he would be alive today." What a stupid comment is this!!!!!! Senna died because his fkn car was damaged and not because of his style of driving a car. Senna is more than just a Legend, he is the best ever.
bozzrk 3 months ago in playlist Ayrton Senna - Entrevistas (Interviews)
名言やな( ´ ▽ ` )ﾉ
sas1whus214nylasd 5 months ago
I like how Senna has absolutely no hesitation in questioning Stewart's question's relevance. Stewart must've been ashamed at hearing such true words being spoken in answer to his question. And Senna is SO charismatic, it's unreal.
hugolafhugolaf 5 months ago
@hugolafhugolaf I'm a massive fan of Senna but Stewart has nothing to feel ashamed about .In Jackie Stewart'sday driving like Senna meant death, that's the bottom line.Jackie is a champion not only as driver but also for pushing for for safety measures in the sport. Stewart lost MANY friends who were killed racing and experienced the fall-out.Senna was a game changer but Stewart deserves some respect and Senna was v.defensive because this came after the dreadful he pulled on Prost at Suzuka.
thehitchrules 5 months ago
LET THE SPIRIT LIVE ON ! ! !
ayrtonsennaonline 5 months ago
Stewarts is a twat...
windex1234 5 months ago
@windex1234 @00:35 Hmmm very.
Mightierthanever 5 months ago in playlist Ayrton Senna
At the time this interview took place, Jackie Stewart was acting as nothing less than Jean-Marie Balestre's political henchman. The FIA threw all of it's support behind Alain Prost and set out on a campaign to discredit Senna as a driver and a person. Balestre used Stewart's legitimate desire to improve F1 safety as a way to sandbag Senna in an interview. It was a sad display that reveals the shady underbelly of Formula 1 racing. Not too unlike what has gone on with Lewis Hamilton recently.
downforcemedia 5 months ago
@downforcemedia Brilliant comment!
BiggerThinking1 5 months ago
@downforcemedia Good comment . Senna was cast as the villain of the peace no doubt .
thehitchrules 5 months ago
Love that he calls him Stewart haha
Jazfonz 5 months ago
legendary..Nothing can replace this loss.. RIP
acv318 5 months ago in playlist Ayrton Senna
Thank you for posting this!
krimreaper 5 months ago
Formula One has always been a dangerous sport, dangerous for the aggressive drivers and dangerous for the less aggressive and all know the field they play on! All the safety measures in today's modern race format will not stop crashes because of the limitless amount of variables to be factored into the grand scheme of things. I have the greatest amount of respect for Senna because he was capable of pulling off spectacular driving that only few were capable of. He drove to win...period!
tommynnocker 5 months ago
"If you no longer go for a gap that exists, You are no longer a racing driver"
Loved that line :P.
megarastek 5 months ago 34
"I race to win... I race designed to win."
- Ayrton Senna
6704superveloce 5 months ago 4
LEGEND
2fast012 5 months ago
Sometimes you get it wrong? No one was faster than Senna,to be sure, but Jackie Stewart has got a point about the crashing.. The same can be said for Schumacher.
spmauzy 6 months ago
As for who's 'the best", i'm not going to argue with F1 pilots themselves, who last year voted guess-who as the best of all time ;)
Which does not make Fangio or Stewart less great, just more forgotten. In 10 years Schumacher will be The Greatest and Senna will be "the one who died". But not for me.
victordk13 6 months ago
@martytc afaik, senna was disqualified for shortcutting chikane, not for a push-start. this penalty was not often applied, but for him an exception was made. so he felt that he was denied a chance to win the championship, and again, in this race, despite senna's pole position, prost had a better placement on the grid. i don't want to sound like what senna did was justified, but i know for myself, when you are enraged for being treated unfairly, you may make ugly and stupid things.
victordk13 6 months ago
Anyone who talks about how Schumi was a "bad guy" for whatever action needs to take a closer look at this vid. All top-level drivers are ruthlessly competitive, because if they're not, the person slipstreaming to pass them is. Some of them have been smoother, and have likely gotten away with more, but to think they weren't pushing the limits of the technical and the legal is naive.
7j8i9m 6 months ago
AYRTON SENNA = MASTER YODA
ALAIN PROST = DARTH SIDIOUS
MICHAEL SCHUMACHER = OBI WAN KENOBI
2007 SEASON = A NEW HOPE
FERNANDO ALONSO = DARTH VADER
LEWIS HAMILTON = LUKE SKYWALKER
SEBASTIEN BIEBER VETTEL = HAN SOLO
MARK WEBBER = CHEWBACCA
Euclides287 6 months ago 10
@Euclides287 LMAO !! XDDDDDDDDDDD
hamiltonfan4eva 3 months ago
Jackie, You no longer a racing driver!
tincstincs 6 months ago 3
watch complete interview here: watch?v=m9GPBKpEFtc
swallowAyrtonSenna 6 months ago
in short....f**k you Stewart!! hahaha
rapidtranq 6 months ago
"if you no fill in the gap in racing, you no longer a racing driver"
brianjgtc90s 6 months ago
was this is excuse for trying to kill Prost?
steviegbcool 6 months ago
@steviegbcool Comment has nothing to do with Prost. If you'd followed F1 you'd know that Senna crashed into Prost because Jean-Marie Balestre the president of the FIA vetoed the decision of the race director who allowed Senna to start the 1990 race at Suzuka from pole on the clean side of the track. Balestre in a bid to help Prost win the title moved pole back to the dirty side. You should rethink your comment given the fact that Prost deliberately crashed into Senna at the chicane in 1989.
Senna458 4 months ago
@Senna458 exactly he did it purpose , if prost died senna would of been held for manslaughter.
steviegbcool 4 months ago
@steviegbcool He did indeed, just as Prost purposely crashed into him the previous year. By your logic, had Senna died in 1989 Prost would have been held for manslaughter. So what is your point? Prost crashed into Senna to win the title, a dirty tactic without question. Senna crashed into Prost because he was being treated unfairly by the FIA president whom Prost was manipulating to gain an advantage he could not gain through skill and talent. You cannot condemn Senna and absolve Prost mate.
Senna458 3 months ago 3
@Senna458 1. Prost said He didn't Crash on purpose and a lot of people believe him,
2. Even if it was on purpose you are not really risking another persons life crashing at 35mph At 160mph you very much are, That day Senna was the luckiest man alive.
steviegbcool 3 months ago
@steviegbcool You are absolutely kidding yourself. Prost = hypocrite, Senna = the best ever. Deal with it.
Senna458 3 months ago in playlist Ayrton Senna
@Senna458 The best ever at deliberatly crashing into someone at high speed.
steviegbcool 3 months ago
@steviegbcool Poor boy, pretending to know everything about something you obviously know nothing about.
Senna458 3 months ago
@steviegbcool You're just bitter !!
thehitchrules 3 months ago
@thehitchrules your just retarded.
steviegbcool 3 months ago
@steviegbcool Learn to spell. It is 'you're' NOT your . Oh dear, not as clever as you think you are !!!
thehitchrules 3 months ago
Lewis Hamilton and Ayrton Senna are cut from the same cloth.
hamishdipp 6 months ago 7
@hamishdipp I have to disagree....Senna had way more personality and depth, Hamilton, to me, is petulant and makes stupid errors. He never admits to his mistakes, and instead blames other people. Senna stood for his beliefs and when he was wrong he admitted it. Hamilton.....blah......not a fan tbh. In my opinion t