++ telkines --- IF ever comes to that ... I think it will ... USA showing real face in the time of economic crisis ...
Where are Russian Submarines , They carry , ICBM's with multiple H-bomb warheads , EVERY USA city will receive one , Lets be honest , You may destroy , Russian NAVY , But you will not have people to fight FOR ... Forget IT . IF it was that easy to CONQUER Russia , I am telling you USA would be first to try IT.
Moskva carries cruise missles that strike at like 3,000 mph and is just at advanced at targeting and attacking multiple ships simulataneously as any US or any other missle cruiser. The US ships are weaker actually in some respects- Tomohawks suck- they are sub sonic and go around 600 mph which make them extremely easy to shoot out of the sky.
The ships are also off Russias large coast in the black sea and can be targeting and hit by cruise missle bombers, land base cruise, you name it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
russia is so stupid they need to stop all that propaganda bull and just leave georgia completly. there doing this now because they think there a super power again but there have to realize that as long as the U.S is still here there will always be second to America as being the most dominate force in the world.
the Russians are concerned, but all is propaganda to deflect the genocide in Caucasus. The NATO ships (U.S., U.K. ,german and spanish) is much powerful than russian ships (from 70´s and 80´s ) The F-102 spanish frigate with aegys system is launched in 2004 and one of the most advanced ships in the world .
You're talking out of your behind! The Moskva alone, can literally destroy a carrier group by itself! Those NATO ships aren't much of a challenge for this ONE ship, let alone the Black Sea Fleet.
Unfortunately i don´t agree with you my friend. The USS Theodore Roosevelt task force with the new spanish Aegis F 100 armed with harpoons and tomahawks could sink four or five Moskvas without any problem.
You can think whatever you want, but the Moskva is armed with similar weapon systems, and has been constantly upgraded through the years to keep it in top combat readiness. What ever "floats your boat" pal.
The "Moskva" (like in the past the "Bismarck" or the "Yamato", were also sunk by combined allied fleets ) are an iron monster-ship of thousands of sailors served in , but , truly, in serious combat, is no match for an combined NATO Fleet with modern Aircrafts, launch-rocket frigates and submarines guided by satellite .
Your replies are filled with ignorance. The Moskva was designed to "kill" carrier battle groups. All of it's weapons, such as the P-500 Bazalt Surface to Surface Missile (SSM) canisters with their 4K80 missiles, and the 64S-300MPU/3R41 SAMS, have no equal in the West. Go ahead, and "Google" Moskva, and you'll soon find out how puny an Aegis Class vessel is in comparison to the Slava Class Moskva.
no my friend. The rockets of the Moskva are ancient Soviet firecrackers in comparison with the modern tomahawks. The nations worldwide desires the American technology and resources, not the Russian military . The Moskva is an ancient carrier of the 80´s (Soviet times) .
12 U.S. modern aircrafts + 2 French aircrafts + 1 Italian modern aircraft + 2 Spanish modern aircrafts + 4 British modern aircrafts against an old Russian aircraft.
NATO is Bilderberg, which owns the EU. Russia is a Superpower so they can do a lot to stop NATO from expanding. I oppose NATO as this is just the US using NATO to bully countries in and make money in US selling military arsenals weaking the US military even more. NATO is evil, it needs to stop expanding.
You people are idiots. Why don't you mention Israel's role in creating a post-Soviet world?
khavarian 1 year ago
++ telkines --- IF ever comes to that ... I think it will ... USA showing real face in the time of economic crisis ...
Where are Russian Submarines , They carry , ICBM's with multiple H-bomb warheads , EVERY USA city will receive one , Lets be honest , You may destroy , Russian NAVY , But you will not have people to fight FOR ... Forget IT . IF it was that easy to CONQUER Russia , I am telling you USA would be first to try IT.
aviomaster 2 years ago
Moskva carries cruise missles that strike at like 3,000 mph and is just at advanced at targeting and attacking multiple ships simulataneously as any US or any other missle cruiser. The US ships are weaker actually in some respects- Tomohawks suck- they are sub sonic and go around 600 mph which make them extremely easy to shoot out of the sky.
The ships are also off Russias large coast in the black sea and can be targeting and hit by cruise missle bombers, land base cruise, you name it.
Killazer 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
russia is so stupid they need to stop all that propaganda bull and just leave georgia completly. there doing this now because they think there a super power again but there have to realize that as long as the U.S is still here there will always be second to America as being the most dominate force in the world.
ROEDIZEM 3 years ago
the Russians are concerned, but all is propaganda to deflect the genocide in Caucasus. The NATO ships (U.S., U.K. ,german and spanish) is much powerful than russian ships (from 70´s and 80´s ) The F-102 spanish frigate with aegys system is launched in 2004 and one of the most advanced ships in the world .
telkines 3 years ago
propaganda...yes, western anti-Russian propaganda works very well
TomaSkTemplar 3 years ago
You're talking out of your behind! The Moskva alone, can literally destroy a carrier group by itself! Those NATO ships aren't much of a challenge for this ONE ship, let alone the Black Sea Fleet.
edwong3 3 years ago
Unfortunately i don´t agree with you my friend. The USS Theodore Roosevelt task force with the new spanish Aegis F 100 armed with harpoons and tomahawks could sink four or five Moskvas without any problem.
telkines 3 years ago
You can think whatever you want, but the Moskva is armed with similar weapon systems, and has been constantly upgraded through the years to keep it in top combat readiness. What ever "floats your boat" pal.
edwong3 3 years ago
The "Moskva" (like in the past the "Bismarck" or the "Yamato", were also sunk by combined allied fleets ) are an iron monster-ship of thousands of sailors served in , but , truly, in serious combat, is no match for an combined NATO Fleet with modern Aircrafts, launch-rocket frigates and submarines guided by satellite .
telkines 3 years ago
Your replies are filled with ignorance. The Moskva was designed to "kill" carrier battle groups. All of it's weapons, such as the P-500 Bazalt Surface to Surface Missile (SSM) canisters with their 4K80 missiles, and the 64S-300MPU/3R41 SAMS, have no equal in the West. Go ahead, and "Google" Moskva, and you'll soon find out how puny an Aegis Class vessel is in comparison to the Slava Class Moskva.
edwong3 3 years ago
no my friend. The rockets of the Moskva are ancient Soviet firecrackers in comparison with the modern tomahawks. The nations worldwide desires the American technology and resources, not the Russian military . The Moskva is an ancient carrier of the 80´s (Soviet times) .
telkines 3 years ago
I think the only thing "ancient" here is your mind, even though you're probably a kid who knows no better about modern military hardware. Good bye!
edwong3 3 years ago
Good bye and good retirement as pensioneer , Moskva !
telkines 3 years ago
12 U.S. modern aircrafts + 2 French aircrafts + 1 Italian modern aircraft + 2 Spanish modern aircrafts + 4 British modern aircrafts against an old Russian aircraft.
telkines 3 years ago
Independence to the republics of Russia:
1)Adygea 2)Altai 3)Bashkortostan 4)Buryatia
5)Dagestan 6)Ingushetia 7)Kabardino-Balkaria
8)Kalmykia 9)Karachay-Cherkessia 10)Karelia 11)Komi 12)Mari El 13)Mordovia 14)Sakha (Yakutia) 15)North Ossetia-Alania 16)Tatarstan 17)Tuva 18)Udmurtia 19)Khakassia 20)Chechnya (Ichkeria) 21)Chuvashia
georgianborat 3 years ago
They don't ask for independence except part of Chechnia.
Globalizator1 3 years ago
Freedom to California(it's multiethnic),Havaii,Alaska from USA
Globalizator1 3 years ago
NATO is Bilderberg, which owns the EU. Russia is a Superpower so they can do a lot to stop NATO from expanding. I oppose NATO as this is just the US using NATO to bully countries in and make money in US selling military arsenals weaking the US military even more. NATO is evil, it needs to stop expanding.
oxforduniversity 3 years ago 3
watch?v=H0XgXJAYxZM
dibblydooda 3 years ago
I dont belive in America.
prokurtan 3 years ago 4
Yes, US and NATO doing all to begin war with Russia (which defending people in S. Ossetia and Russia's safety).
It's terrible how world mass media now accuse Russians actions and support US military help for Georgia!
But all normal, adequate and clever people already understand the real situation, that only aggressors in this war is Georgia, with US mercenaries!
So let's stop this US "democracy", which killed thousands of civillians in many countries! World will live in peace without them
igorvasilevsky 3 years ago 7