No, you said that you call bullshit that *any* plant can absorb more carbon than it releases when it dies or is burned. You are completely wrong, even burned plants leave some carbon behind, it does not all go into CO2. So rather than admit that you are completely full of shit....you move the goalposts.
@ReignbowSmite Forest ecosystems can store quite considerable amounts of CO2 in the roots and soil. It's one reason why clear-cutting forests and replanting with other crops may not achieve equilibrium
@dookiecheez but the developed nations produce the most per ca-pita. China and India have almost 1/3 of the worlds population, of course they will use more energy resources. however the US, Europe and fully developed nations tend to use far more per person than China and India.
@GRO5002 Let's consider your logic reagarding per-capita energy use. Imagine living in a world in which most countries have millions of people, but there's a very small country called "Consumia" (which I made up) with only 100 people. Consumians LOVE using energy. They drive cars that get 1 MPG and they burn down forests as part of their annual "forest burnfest". Naturally, they have the world's highest per-capita energy use.
But with only 100 people, are THEY the major problem in the world?
@dookiecheez The Guardian published historical CO2 emissions a couple of years ago for 1900-2004; don't know how the numbers are calculated but the US is way, way, WAY out in front.
@dookiecheez The CDN gov't has been in bed with the province of Alberta and the oil industry for a while - it's one of the power bases of the current administration; it's easy to comply with regs when you wrote the script and they've been weakened far below what could be remotely be considered reasonable.
Conventional oil processing uses about 1/2 gal. water per gallon oil - shale oil needs about 2-3x the amount of water and tar sands about 4-6x
How can a country be in bed with one of it's provinces?
I wonder if the country with the most fresh water in the world, probably the least used source, can deal with a higher level of water consumption.
I'd be more worried about the way oil is processed in Africa and the middle east. There's a very high human cost, it may not be all paid in lives but it is surely paid in depreciating it.
Not to say that the oil sands can't improve, they can, and it's my understanding that they are.
@dookiecheez No matter how much we have of something, we can always waste or contaminate it. The Athabasca river, downstream of the tar sands, have elevated levels of over a dozen toxic substances, mercury, cadmium, etc. The ponds hold a TRILLION gallons and LEAK about 1 billion gals/yr - over 1500 Olympic sized swimming pools of filthy, toxic "water". Also, it appears the amount of water needed to process the bitumen is grossly underestimated; the true number is 10-12:1 not 4-6
@dookiecheez Do you think you can just skim the dark stuff off the top and it'll all be okay? Some companies got fined because some ducks landed in a pond and died. I guess somebody could make a few bucks selling Canuck spring water but they'd quickly lose customers unless they also own funeral homes. If the US wants to take the contaminated water as well as the oil, I'm sure Canada would give a sizable discount off the price.
@dookiecheez Water processing? They'd better get busy - so far 4 cubic miles of contaminated water and growing at the rate of hundreds of thousands to a million gallons daily
Canada produces only 2% of the world's C02 and the oil sands 0.8 % of that. The video is all propaganda for AGW, morphed to Climate Change out of necessity and then morphed to Climate disruption. What a climate deception.
copy to youtube search.. ( Newt Rips Gore's 'Facts' To Pieces ) .................
( Unstoppable Solar Cycles ) ....
This video is from Stanford University talk of loads of oil .. loads of gas..loads of coal worldwide ..and pumping millions of tons? of Co2 into the ground.. a drilling for oil technique ( Carbon Capture & Sequestration 101 | GCEP Symposium 2010 ) ....
@redrik09 Yeah, there's plenty of oil, gas and coal but the easy, light, sweet crude seems to be a thing of the past, the US massive gas reserves seem to be only recoverable using fracking which poisons the water table and, well, coal's problems - where to begin? The Stanford videos on energy are very informative but CCS is so untried and expensive (as are scrubbers for the other nasties in the coal exhaust), you might as well stop building coal plants and start building more nuclear reactors.
"Summer is rapidly winding down in the Arctic, and (based on DMI graphs) the region north of 80N appears set to finish the summer as the coldest on record. So far, there have only been a small handful of days which made it up to normal temperatures. The Arctic is one of many places described by climate scientists as “the fastest warming place on earth."
Ice melt during July was the slowest in the JAXA record.
global warming is real for the past but what is the cause. If you are implying that it is caused by humans you are wrong. Look at the NASA data proving the incidence and magnitude of sunspots controlling how hot it is on earth.......look it up and stop spreading propaganda......they want you to so they can tax you everytime you exhale
You are aware that climatologists are completely aware of the suns role in heating the earth? Or do you expect that they do as little research before coming to a conclusion as you do?
@ReignbowSmite I am very much a chemtrail skeptic but someone sent me a video I have to admit - that's no normal contrail. Not at all. As a fellow skeptic I invite your visual inspection of the claim: /watch?v=eb0J83blpTA
@zalida100 have you seen this video? This may address some of your questions about climate change & global warming not being a hoax.
I also forgot to mention many fish we eat (or what they eat, or where they live like in corals) are threatened by an acidic ocean (carbonic acid: too much CO2 is dissolved into the sea water from the atmosphere). That's not a temperature-problem, it's a chemistry problem from CO2 emissions. Bad for our food; nature can adapt but we get to die that way.
I think when the term "chem trail" is used; it is in referring to "cloud seeding" and or "geoengineering". Neither of these are new technologies or a conspiracy.
Where I live (central Canada) insurance companies cloud seed to prevent hail on crops thus insurance payouts on crops.
Scientist can't explain why humans blush, sneeze or yawn. I am going to be very skeptical on the 'plan' to control the weather on our rock spinning in space.
@ReignbowSmite You are confusing contrails with chemtrails. Contrails do not trail many miles behind the plane, and clouding the whole sky after an hour or so. They evaporate very quickly. Members of Parliament in the UK that have asked questions about this matter, have been warned off this subject. Why? You should ask your own legislator to do the same.....
The scientific consensus is that temperatures are rising and will continue to do so.
There is a minority who disagrees with the scale of the anthropogenic emissions and their effect, BUT NO REPUTABLE SCIENTIST DISAGREES WITH WARMING.
If there is some profit to be made from hyping global warming, it is simply dwarfed by the profits reaped by oil, coal and gas industries, plus all those who use cheap carbon-fuels in their industry.
@hyperboreean "The scientific consensus is that temperatures are rising"
When did facts become a matter of consensus? Is the truth a poll? I'd rather see a graph of average global temperature from at least 50 years ago to today. Why didn't you link him a graph via PM? However, there is a margin of error and it would be good to know what it is given that there are reservations about the state of many weather stations around the globe and thus the validity of the data they contribute
@hyperboreean additionally, any graph plotting from 1880 is essentially a propaganda chart since temperature readings from the end of the 19th century into the beginning of the 20th are essentially quasi-global. They're marginally useful as a rough guide but far from being acutely accurate
@BOZ11 Stop making silly equivocations and also stop sniping relevant parts of sentences. Scientific consensus is not reached by staging a popularity contest any more than theory is some shit you make up. It means all available data supports this position.
Why didn't you provide links?
And for pity's sake try to refrain from using expressions like "acutely accurate".
Anybody notice the weather? Florida's freezing. the Metrodome just collapsed by the weight of snow. When Long Island becomes a skinny sandbar, I'll admit that the water levels are rising. But then you'll have to prove that it's our fault.
@bammbamm12 You'll notice no one ever gives a shit what you think because your head is clogged with nonsense. So no, no one will be bothering to keep you posted.
Strange .. ! All Daphne's body language , hand gestures etc. seem to indicate evasion or deception when she addresses the chem-trail question. This could be because she is trying to sound knowledgeable about something of which she knows nothing. Or ..... ?
@ReignbowSmite "Idiotic" is talking out your ass not knowing in fact that Hemp absorbs metric shit-loads of Co2 all night long more than any other plant.
More than can be produced by the burning of it..
... and so you were imagining what???
"There is so much wrong with this idea."
Yes it is true, Hemp would ruin the TOXIC monopoly production base of everything; from plastics, fuel, clothes, concrete, housing lumber, medicine et al.
@ReignbowSmite I spend 8 years living in Europe and the sky was full of chemtrails all the time, then move to India, no chemtrails, now I'm in Argentina, no chemtrails, so yes, there are chemtrails in the NATO countries, what they are I don't know, but they are there
@kurydebarcelona Yeah , I've seen them in England. Something I observed before I had heard anyone talking about them. I spend time outdoors looking at things. It is surprising how few people look and see what is happening in their environment, yet the people who not go out and wander and gaze do love to have an opinion about such things.
it can be part, in some aspects of its potential uses, of the anti missile shield system. It is said they can elevate the conductivity of the atmosphere by spraying certain metal particles so their new ELF detection and communication system are enhanced. Now ionizing a jet plane's frame will no longer make it stealth like with the older radars.
all these systems are very destructive to health and are the true cause of illness attributed to climate change(cancers)
I'm unsubscribing... the "real" news is far too one-sided. there's never any debate. While I am concerned about pollution, I'm no longer concerned over so-called warming...
@Timeofflux Before any air breathing animal walked the earth, the oxygen level on earth could not sustain any mammals. The atmosphere was saturated with CO2.Then plants and marine algae started trapping the CO2 and the millions of year latter it was buried for ever in the dept of the earth, or was it. Then men started taking it back out (oil) and so we are re-releasing it back in the atmosphere. Why don't we just keep on sucking that CO2 out of the ground and see what will happens.
The question should have been about stratospheric geo-engineering
con-trails evaporate behind the plane
It has nothing to do with 'altitude'
chem trails are due to the 'pollutants' creating a 'seed' for the moisture to form a droplet & thus man-made clouds
Even the climate change 'sceptics' argue that water vapour is the biggest greenhouse gas so even if they're just 'con' trails, it MUST have an effect.
The number of con-trails worldwide must reflect sunlight to space & so less gets to ground
@redrik09 only low-level cloud... cumulus... Stratospheric clouds (sirrus) actually do more to reflect sunlight back into space (especially when it's just a 'haze' & then of course less sunlight reaches the ground so the lady's comments about plants was also correct.
@redrik09 yes I picked up on that. zero point trees obviously. lol
However the natural carbon cycle is well understood... & we are even a part of it in more ways than the air we breathe. The whole cycle of food/energy we get to live & the air we breath & the carbon gas we breath out are all connected. Even the rotting food we don't eat releases carbon gas (Methane). In fact if we took all the bio-gas from our rubbish it would produce as much natural gas as we use today
@ejbh3160 Thankfully some cities are taking that garbage and getting the methane. If we combined that methane collection with composting we could do a lot
@ytgv3fc7 totally agree dude... imo bio-degradable stuff could be sorted in the home. Once the rotting stuff has been removed from 'garbage' it is much easier to sort the rest mechanically or by hand because it's dry.
In fact if all our 'food waste' & biodegradables were mixed with sewage in anaerobic digesters we could stop using gas from the ground! Have you seen the video on 'Fracking'? But then the fosil fuel cartels won't get a 'Bonus' at Christmas eh?
@Verdenfell You're on drugs - this lady told you what's really happening and like a sheeple puppet you screamed and covered your eyes and said "NO TRUTH FOR ME! NOOOOOOO"
very weird put possible...I have seen myself the ''orbs '' on four occasion and have taken pictures of them. always near or when a screen of aerosols have been sprayed...the so-called ''project blue beam'' sounds far off, but the technologies are in place for such a grand subterfuge...our microwave cellphones towers have many potential uses...from crowd control to direct tower to eardrums bone communications...oh and microwaves interact with water in the air ofc...spammersDIE
@ReignbowSmite The very same type and group of people who are carrying america into this climate change are the same type and group of people who allowed and created the atomic bomb, then dropped it on innocent people. Weapons of mass destruction exist all over and in the hands of people not afraid to use them, but you so eagerly defend them. I guess questioning authority is bad right? The IPCC fraud came out in 26,000 emails. I don't think that is going away any time soon, even if you want it.
@ReignbowSmite Scientist have found sulfate, aluminum dioxide, Bromium and other dangerous chems from chemtrails over Mt. Shasta. So why the little concern from the guest? The chemtrails are obviously not contrail which disapear right away. The chemtrails leave an yellow, mucky sky -covering in the evening. I have been seeing this for years now. Maybe people should look up.
Simple science for simple people tells you that ice crystals form which is true. They also dissipate quickly. If you see one still in the air after a few minutes and think that is a contrail then you should get off youtube and spend more time learning some science.
Jeeze again, - the length of time it takes to disipate a contrail is determined by the conditions in the atmosphere. In the right temperature and humidity they can stick around for some time; you should "spend more time learning some science." yourself.
@ReignbowSmite wrongo hemp oil is carbon neutral unlike crude oil its a very simple process and you don't have to use hemp oil the first diesel engine ran on peanut oil it was designed for any oil and saying it would take up too much land is idiotic in the extreme it takes around 3 months from seed to harvest and the by products are better than crude yes use wind and solar but this would bridge between the crude and renewable peace
first call-------------chemtrails---well, well--------------no scientific proof---guess you would have to do the studies-----please see "what in the world are they spraying"
@ReignbowSmite well she has a point with the abnormal airplane trails that dont dissipate until after like 30minutes. I have seen these things first hand. now the top of it making the days shorter....I dont think that there is a link up with that.
Sigh, - The length of time it takes for contrails to dissipate is determined by the conditions of the atmosphere. No mystery about it, just science. Under the correct conditions they can persist for some time. And as Reighbow stated already, it is impossible for the length of the days to change by spraying anything in the atmosphere, you would need a shift in the rotation of the planet.
These particles are not naturally forming, nor are Contrails that last 10+ hours forming a dull grayish haze in rare cases dropping a web-like snot upon the Earth casing a rampant epidemic of Flu-like symptoms where it lands.
What is this blaming Canada for the tar sands. I believe that they are representing the interests of US owned oil companies. Canada does not even get enough oil revenue to cover the infrastructure upgrade costs that will accompany the tar sands development.
Yes Reignbow... that must be why all our soil samples show barium and aluminum oxide in our soils and air quality. It's all our imagination... I've been on 4 antibiotics and nothing gets rid of this crap living in our bodies. Barium and aluminum oxide plaque the lungs and cause cancer, this is why many of the nuts who are spraying this on us via Evergreen Aviation here in the US are getting cancer from handling this crap on their planes. Sounds like pure Karma to me.
"Barium is surprisingly abundant in the Earth's crust, being the 14th most abundant element. High amounts of barium may only be found in soils and in food, such as nuts, seaweed, fish and certain plants.
Because of the extensive use of barium in the industries human activities add greatly to the release of barium in the environment. As a result barium concentrations in air, water and soil may be higher than naturally occurring concentrations on many locations.
Barium enters the air during mining processes, refining processes, and during the production of barium compounds. It can also enter the air during coal and oil combustion."
-
So if you're concerned about Barium in the environment it's not because of spraying it in the air but industrialization and it's use. So you should support alternative energy like Solar. Otherwise just put your tinfoil hat back or you only prove your deluded.
@bammbamm12 Don't get caught up in there propaganda man. There is global warming and there is global cooling, but the constant misuse of these common terms create this type of issue we have now with extremist environmentalism. Next they'll call me out on it all, but I'm merely agreeing with you in the sense that what mainstream says is utterly false. These cheese heads on the other hand apparently believe everything at face value. Agenda, Agenda, Agenda. The hockey stick graph is bullshit.
@bammbamm12 ... take no notice of ReignbowSmite .." You can lead a horse to water.. but you can't make it drink.." .. " If everyone is pointing at the sky.. only a fool would not look up .."
@ytgv3fc7 Can you explain then why Phil Jones (creator of Gores hockey stick) said in a BC interview over how he managed to lose all that data that there has been no global warming since 1995 and global cooling since 2003?
@Smarterthanyouarable of course I can explain it - it's a huge lie. The data is NOT missing and there has been global warming the whole time. Check with NASA, the data is public, it is available. Check with NOAA, public and available. Check with Environment Canada, public and available. No secrets here - to not understand this is public and available and has been the entire time is nonsensical. There has not been global cooling and all claims there have been are a fraud and a farce.
@ytgv3fc7 Phil Jones BBC Feb 13 2010 :B - Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming. "Yes, but only just." There is a little find it kind of thingy called a search engine. Play with one sometimes.
@Smarterthanyouarable epic fail - search engines can bring you any false result you want by going to nonsense quotes.
I just flagged your name in a reply to another video you didn't look at and in your email notification you can go TO the video (young turks) and this will clarify your fantasy nonsense there has been global cooling. There has not been.
@ytgv3fc7 If you are to lazy to get off your happy ass to learn something then warn us before we waste any time with you. You could have searched the BBC site just as easily. That is the lamest excuse for mental laziness I have heard. A google search can bring a million hits and it does not take much effort to find one you deem credible. To make that argument and use TYT as an example of a credible source is just fucking embarrassing. You should delete your comment in my opinion.
@ytgv3fc7 Mark as spam? I cut a fucking bullet out of leg with a pocket knife. How much of a pussy do you have to be to flag someone because they disagree with you?
@GnosticNinja cold snaps in winter, not summer, are part of global warming as part of the average increase - e.g. if this year is average warmer +1 and summer is average warmer by 5 degrees then you can expect something like a -4 in the winter compared to the previous year.
It has to be cold every summer and every winter every year for you to be right and it isn't so you're not.
Summer brought record heat and the year over-all is record hotter and has been every year so you're still wrong.
@bofors7715 get off the drugs, retard! No one made up global warming, it's a proven fact. I replied to you in another video which points it out as it has been pointed out OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN - GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL AND MORONS WHO DRINK DRAINO AND HIT THEIR SKULLS WITH HAMMERS, such as yourself are the ONLY MORONS ON THE ENTIRE PLANET WHO SAY global warming is not real.
of humanity fix Global War...erm... (I mean) "Climate Change ™"??
How does graciously showering the inbred self appointed "rulers" of Earths inhabitants with even more ill gotten gains EVER going to fix the factually recorded yet ending cycle of the SAME EXACT occurrence found on all the other planets in our Solar System???
@gavhof really: you need peer reviewed evidence to show the planets ARE heating, not the other way around. The burden of proof is on you, the claimant. The only source of heating energy is the sun in our solar system. We'd be charred black before pluto got any heat increase; same for Neptune to get a 1 degree increase. Inverse square law: go look it up. For every linear distance closer, the power increase is SQUARED (watts per meter squared of solar energy).
@ytgv3fc7 It's also worth pointing out that the surface temperature on Venus is greater than on Mercury despite Mercury being much closer to the sun because of, gasp/shock/horror/, the greenhouse effect.
@cory2146 we have no refineries in Canada. I insist we should have them, other people say No. It's nonsense and it's costing our economy DEARLY. WE could cut our gasoline costs in half by having our own refineries.
er...I don't like this chick already. sounds a little like controlled opposition to be able to dismiss the geoengineered chemtrails, with her answer. That did not answer that lady' question at all. If you would like some info try "what in the world are they spraying?". Talks about geoengineering, that IS going on regardless of this UN treaty to ban them(which btw proved they exist). You can also try Dennis Kucinichs' HR2977 for some official use of chemtrail usage(was not signed into law).
HR2977 had NOTHING to do with your silly tin foil hat stuff. It was about not being able to base weapons in space like Nuclear platforms and satellite destroyers.
From the Bill stating its purpose:
"To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons."
@Rundstedt1 Ok, but however it does put emphasis on the term "CHEMTRAILS". So apparently I'm using a tin foil hat when I speak about that? It is talking about technotronic weapons. I'm merely pointing to the FACT they exist. Try getting a copy of ecoscience, from obama czar John Holdren or The grand checkboard. Perhaps you need to reread my post. Geoengineering exists dude and not to mention the U.N. and it's moratorium on it all. Keep sleeping harcore man, it'll make you happy in the end.
Its important that people learn real facts. This Church of Consperiology and its dogma of Denialism will bring the extinction of the human race if they win.
Reignbow those are contrails. They evaporate in about 20 minutes. "Chemtrails" stay in the sky for many hours. There are about 8 million pictures online of them criss crossing the sky. WAKE UP!! Forget simple science and find common sense
How long a vapor trail stays around depends on the condintions of the atmposphere. If condensation trail sticks around depends on the ambient humidity. If humidity is low, contrails will rapidly dissipate, looking like a comet's tail. The ice particles sublimate; meaning to go straight from ice to vapor; and you're back to blue sky. If humidity is high, however, contrails can persist quite a long time. All you are seeing is vapor trails and don't understand the sceince behind it.
okay... what happens to climate chem trails? nobody seems to know or they certainly do not know... yet no questions are asked debated and spoken... if you want to talk about neural toxins look at chem trails...
So you are saying that the climate will warm up by 4 degrees Celsius in 100 years. Wow. Meteorology has really improved since I am used to not knowing what the weather will be like next week. You know when the meteorologist on the news claims that tomorrow will be clear and sunny, when it turns out to be cold and rainy.
@raguila11 Climate and weather while related, are VERY different. Weather is what is going on now and in a day or two. Climate is a pattern of weather over very long extended measurable periods.
I was going to un subscribe from this dis information channel a while ago but its done now. They know what is going on, please tell me everyone else can see through their BS. He pretended he didn't know what they were! If you subscribe, un subscribe, you dont need another avenue of BS! If anyone one wants more info please ask. Keep Sharp people and don't be fooled
It's good to see someone rational and reality based here. Keep it up. I know it's not easy and frustrating. I mean, good grief, they don't even know what condensation is; let alone global climate change. I suppose when they see an old documentary about the bombing of Germany and see the waves of planes with vapor trails that those bombers were somehow also carrying tons of some chemical to spray. People who lost their tin-foil hats should just stay away from ANYTHING marked a REAL
@Timeofflux Well my grandmother has been smoking since the age of 19 and she's 78 now. And that is true. And she has not been diagnosed with cancer yet so that means scientists are wrong.Cigarettes doesn't cause cancer. Right. So they must be wrong about climate change too!
@ReignbowSmite I am not trolling you. I am just dumbfounded by the attitude of some skeptics like you,that since what they know is true and based on evidence,they expect the world should suddenly all get it at once.Yeah wake up,War is obviously madness yet it is still there, Politicians are fraudsters but they still have their Job. Knowing something is not enough if you are a bloody rude and arrogant person. I wont comment on you anymore, you can save your efforts for the Lulz only. thinking
@ReignbowSmite Check out 300 times more aluminum in drinking water.. or something like that.. 2.10am in the Uk.. I'm to tired to Carry on chatting with you.. if you wish I will check-out the aluminum thing and get back with a link.. later.
@ReignbowSmite I assume the woman has some intelligence.. she must of ment the daylight hours seem shorter.. I don't think she means they are pulling the world of it's axis..maybe she feels.. she used to have more sun.. and can't describe her natural feelings.. for it.
@ReignbowSmite Okays then, before I kindly fuck off, one last thing. If you kept trying and nothing came out of it, did it occur to you you and others similarly did something very wrong in the process? If you just repeat what you hold true to people that dont, they will not suddenly change beliefs. Certain penetrative and social skills are required. If you dont have the patience or the skill to do that, then you kindly fuck off, cause you are making things worse rather than better.
@ReignbowSmite .... then you should watch the video I personally took.. on my Phone in cornwall uk .. I think I posted it here earlier.. we have large open skies herein cornwall.. you can see for miles.. you can see the chemtrail.. trails across the sky.. maybe you live in the city and only see 30-40 foot of sky at a time..or maybe you know it's true.. but it's too frightening..
@ReignbowSmite Yeah, only you are both wrong. Neither the video constitutes evidence, nor evidence of any activity of this nature would ever become public. ReignBow you seem to expect people to Be judges and prosecutors if they wanna express an opinion. Since evidence is neither conclusive nor available, they only rational path is to pressure politicians and organizations to have a transparent inquiry. Saying "there is no evidence" in such matters is like saying you do not give a shit.
@ReignbowSmite I am practising what I "preach" to you. Problem is I am only one asshole. I would prefer that less arrogant, more contructive efforts were carried out by ALL sceptics, cause that would make a real change in the world, far beyond any effect I can have by myself. Your fucking YT armchair is a war chariot if you use it correctly. Telling others they are idiots and they believe in bullshit is not constructive. Trying to stand honestly in one's shoes and then discuss with them does.
All comes down to money.
vinsong 5 months ago
watch the movie, what in the world are they spraying.
chem trails are REAL and are killing the earth and civilization;
FIXWCBCANADA 8 months ago
@ReignbowSmite
No, you said that you call bullshit that *any* plant can absorb more carbon than it releases when it dies or is burned. You are completely wrong, even burned plants leave some carbon behind, it does not all go into CO2. So rather than admit that you are completely full of shit....you move the goalposts.
kshackleton 11 months ago
@ReignbowSmite
All plants release their carbon when they die? Really? How does that account for coal?
kshackleton 11 months ago
@ReignbowSmite Forest ecosystems can store quite considerable amounts of CO2 in the roots and soil. It's one reason why clear-cutting forests and replanting with other crops may not achieve equilibrium
R4t10n4L 1 year ago
KILLuminati
killeraz623 1 year ago
um accaully, wikileaks is releasing chem trail documents, the thing causing most problems since 1998
naternatedowg 1 year ago
If by the richest countries produce the most carbon emissions you mean China and India then yeah they do.
dookiecheez 1 year ago
@dookiecheez but the developed nations produce the most per ca-pita. China and India have almost 1/3 of the worlds population, of course they will use more energy resources. however the US, Europe and fully developed nations tend to use far more per person than China and India.
GRO5002 1 year ago
@GRO5002
Energy is one thing, we're talking about emissions. And last time I checked Europe and North America have to deal with winter.
dookiecheez 1 year ago
@GRO5002 Let's consider your logic reagarding per-capita energy use. Imagine living in a world in which most countries have millions of people, but there's a very small country called "Consumia" (which I made up) with only 100 people. Consumians LOVE using energy. They drive cars that get 1 MPG and they burn down forests as part of their annual "forest burnfest". Naturally, they have the world's highest per-capita energy use.
But with only 100 people, are THEY the major problem in the world?
pburto 1 year ago
@dookiecheez The Guardian published historical CO2 emissions a couple of years ago for 1900-2004; don't know how the numbers are calculated but the US is way, way, WAY out in front.
R4t10n4L 1 year ago
@R4t10n4L
In terms of many factors yes, they are grossly inefficient for their population density and affluence.
dookiecheez 1 year ago
Uh...it's not really a cover up. The cdn gov just had a study done, and the oil sands are complying with the environmental recommendations made.
More renewable energy?? Canada runs largely on hydro power, the surplus of which is sold to the states.
And isn't there a way to get the unrefined oil from said sands to be on par with regular oil? Gee I wonder.. :O
dookiecheez 1 year ago
@dookiecheez The CDN gov't has been in bed with the province of Alberta and the oil industry for a while - it's one of the power bases of the current administration; it's easy to comply with regs when you wrote the script and they've been weakened far below what could be remotely be considered reasonable.
Conventional oil processing uses about 1/2 gal. water per gallon oil - shale oil needs about 2-3x the amount of water and tar sands about 4-6x
R4t10n4L 1 year ago
@R4t10n4L
How can a country be in bed with one of it's provinces?
I wonder if the country with the most fresh water in the world, probably the least used source, can deal with a higher level of water consumption.
I'd be more worried about the way oil is processed in Africa and the middle east. There's a very high human cost, it may not be all paid in lives but it is surely paid in depreciating it.
Not to say that the oil sands can't improve, they can, and it's my understanding that they are.
dookiecheez 1 year ago
@dookiecheez No matter how much we have of something, we can always waste or contaminate it. The Athabasca river, downstream of the tar sands, have elevated levels of over a dozen toxic substances, mercury, cadmium, etc. The ponds hold a TRILLION gallons and LEAK about 1 billion gals/yr - over 1500 Olympic sized swimming pools of filthy, toxic "water". Also, it appears the amount of water needed to process the bitumen is grossly underestimated; the true number is 10-12:1 not 4-6
bannor99 1 year ago
@bannor99
Have you ever heard of the dose makes the poison, or water processing?
I'm getting a strong alarmist vibe here.
dookiecheez 1 year ago
@dookiecheez Do you think you can just skim the dark stuff off the top and it'll all be okay? Some companies got fined because some ducks landed in a pond and died. I guess somebody could make a few bucks selling Canuck spring water but they'd quickly lose customers unless they also own funeral homes. If the US wants to take the contaminated water as well as the oil, I'm sure Canada would give a sizable discount off the price.
bannor99 1 year ago
@dookiecheez Water processing? They'd better get busy - so far 4 cubic miles of contaminated water and growing at the rate of hundreds of thousands to a million gallons daily
bannor99 1 year ago
@bannor99
Do you think that water has memory and is forever turned into sludge when in contact with a toxic natural resource?
Are you familiar with water recycling or what?
Somehow I'm not too worried about < 1% of the water of a single river when we have modern processing and recycling technology.
All I'm hearing is the same out of context alarm-ism that we hear about nuclear power.
dookiecheez 1 year ago
@dookiecheez Why isn't the vaunted "modern processing and recycling technology" being used?
bannor99 1 year ago
@bannor99
It is? They're already using mostly recycled water.
dookiecheez 1 year ago
Canada produces only 2% of the world's C02 and the oil sands 0.8 % of that. The video is all propaganda for AGW, morphed to Climate Change out of necessity and then morphed to Climate disruption. What a climate deception.
HSEHL 1 year ago
( Medieval Climate Change, ObamaCare Unconstitutional, Gootube Censorship - New World Next Week )
redrik09 1 year ago
copy to youtube search.. ( Newt Rips Gore's 'Facts' To Pieces ) .................
( Unstoppable Solar Cycles ) ....
This video is from Stanford University talk of loads of oil .. loads of gas..loads of coal worldwide ..and pumping millions of tons? of Co2 into the ground.. a drilling for oil technique ( Carbon Capture & Sequestration 101 | GCEP Symposium 2010 ) ....
redrik09 1 year ago
@redrik09 Yeah, there's plenty of oil, gas and coal but the easy, light, sweet crude seems to be a thing of the past, the US massive gas reserves seem to be only recoverable using fracking which poisons the water table and, well, coal's problems - where to begin? The Stanford videos on energy are very informative but CCS is so untried and expensive (as are scrubbers for the other nasties in the coal exhaust), you might as well stop building coal plants and start building more nuclear reactors.
R4t10n4L 1 year ago
This may interest some of you..copy to youtube search ..( John Coleman - Global Warming Scam )
redrik09 1 year ago
Comment removed
redrik09 1 year ago
(no h t t p or W's)
blogs*latimes*com/lanow/2010/09/las-
summer-ends-with-a-chill-it-was-the-coldest-in-decades*html
@ytgv3fc7 says: "NO TRUTH FOR ME! NOOOOOOO"
"June-August 2009 summer temperature for the contiguous
USA was below average, the 34th coolest on record."
~ (source NOAA)
GnosticNinja 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
summer-ends-with-a-chill-it-was-the-coldest-in-decades*html : fraud
"June-August 2009 summer temperature for the contiguous
USA was below average, the 34th coolest on record." nope, fraud
ytgv3fc7 9 months ago
"Summer is rapidly winding down in the Arctic, and (based on DMI graphs) the region north of 80N appears set to finish the summer as the coldest on record. So far, there have only been a small handful of days which made it up to normal temperatures. The Arctic is one of many places described by climate scientists as “the fastest warming place on earth."
Ice melt during July was the slowest in the JAXA record.
(noW's)wattsupwiththat*com/2010/08/01/sea-ice-news-16/#more-22877
GnosticNinja 1 year ago
global warming is real for the past but what is the cause. If you are implying that it is caused by humans you are wrong. Look at the NASA data proving the incidence and magnitude of sunspots controlling how hot it is on earth.......look it up and stop spreading propaganda......they want you to so they can tax you everytime you exhale
starkman79 1 year ago 3
@starkman79
You are aware that climatologists are completely aware of the suns role in heating the earth? Or do you expect that they do as little research before coming to a conclusion as you do?
dookiecheez 1 year ago
@starkman79 show your sources please. don't just direct people to NASA's webiste. please show your sources
gavhof 8 months ago
It's a madhouse!! A madhouse!!
bammbamm12 1 year ago
Global warming the big lie
hanksnow82 1 year ago
Heres something crazy for you..( Gold Bars-- with Tungsten Cores ) copy to youtube search..
redrik09 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite I am very much a chemtrail skeptic but someone sent me a video I have to admit - that's no normal contrail. Not at all. As a fellow skeptic I invite your visual inspection of the claim: /watch?v=eb0J83blpTA
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@Timeofflux 2010 is the hottest year on record. There is no cooling. You don't check the thermometer much.
Nor do you check NASA reporting the temperatures around the world on a regular basis. Or the weathernetwork web site.
The idea the earth is cooling is a redneck hoax.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@zalida100 have you seen this video? This may address some of your questions about climate change & global warming not being a hoax.
I also forgot to mention many fish we eat (or what they eat, or where they live like in corals) are threatened by an acidic ocean (carbonic acid: too much CO2 is dissolved into the sea water from the atmosphere). That's not a temperature-problem, it's a chemistry problem from CO2 emissions. Bad for our food; nature can adapt but we get to die that way.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite I agree. Planes make contrails.
I think when the term "chem trail" is used; it is in referring to "cloud seeding" and or "geoengineering". Neither of these are new technologies or a conspiracy.
Where I live (central Canada) insurance companies cloud seed to prevent hail on crops thus insurance payouts on crops.
Scientist can't explain why humans blush, sneeze or yawn. I am going to be very skeptical on the 'plan' to control the weather on our rock spinning in space.
general010 1 year ago
Conspiracy theory becomes conspiracy fact!
SuperXwriter 1 year ago
@reignbowsmite lol man when contrails linger for half the day and then expand into clouds theres somthing messed up about that.
lewallen86 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite You are confusing contrails with chemtrails. Contrails do not trail many miles behind the plane, and clouding the whole sky after an hour or so. They evaporate very quickly. Members of Parliament in the UK that have asked questions about this matter, have been warned off this subject. Why? You should ask your own legislator to do the same.....
remfrancis 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
....... ( iPhone Snitch Network Launched - Alex Jones Tv 2/2 ) what a great idea ehh..!
redrik09 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Copy to youtube search.. ( Special Lord Monckton Interview: Scientific Misconduct Needed to Push Nwo Objective 1/5 ) ...
redrik09 1 year ago
This report is blatant & brazen propaganda posing as hidden truth.
The woman talks like a U.N. zombie.
Verdenfell 1 year ago
@Verdenfell You're so quaint.
nilbud 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Copy to your youtube search.... ( 4409 -- They Spray you because they Love YOU? )
redrik09 1 year ago
@Timeofflux
The Earth is NOT cooling.
The scientific consensus is that temperatures are rising and will continue to do so.
There is a minority who disagrees with the scale of the anthropogenic emissions and their effect, BUT NO REPUTABLE SCIENTIST DISAGREES WITH WARMING.
If there is some profit to be made from hyping global warming, it is simply dwarfed by the profits reaped by oil, coal and gas industries, plus all those who use cheap carbon-fuels in their industry.
So, get a clue fucktard.
hyperboreean 1 year ago 19
@hyperboreean
actually global temperature is cooling, but it is warming at the polar regions.
EasternGateGuardian 1 year ago
@EasternGateGuardian
google "global_cooling_is_bunk_draft_nasa_study_finds"
BTW youtube blocks certain links, MOTHERFUCKERS
hyperboreean 1 year ago
@hyperboreean "The scientific consensus is that temperatures are rising"
When did facts become a matter of consensus? Is the truth a poll? I'd rather see a graph of average global temperature from at least 50 years ago to today. Why didn't you link him a graph via PM? However, there is a margin of error and it would be good to know what it is given that there are reservations about the state of many weather stations around the globe and thus the validity of the data they contribute
BOZ11 1 year ago
@hyperboreean additionally, any graph plotting from 1880 is essentially a propaganda chart since temperature readings from the end of the 19th century into the beginning of the 20th are essentially quasi-global. They're marginally useful as a rough guide but far from being acutely accurate
BOZ11 1 year ago
@BOZ11 Stop making silly equivocations and also stop sniping relevant parts of sentences. Scientific consensus is not reached by staging a popularity contest any more than theory is some shit you make up. It means all available data supports this position.
Why didn't you provide links?
And for pity's sake try to refrain from using expressions like "acutely accurate".
hyperboreean 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hyperboreean "Scientific consensus is not reached by staging a popularity contest"
Consensus is about popularity. Would be good of of you to consult a dictionary rather than tell me how to write.
"Why didn't you provide links?"
I will, if I make any vacuous assertions.
BOZ11 1 year ago
@Timeofflux ...and there's more even...
MustacheVerra 1 year ago
Anybody notice the weather? Florida's freezing. the Metrodome just collapsed by the weight of snow. When Long Island becomes a skinny sandbar, I'll admit that the water levels are rising. But then you'll have to prove that it's our fault.
bammbamm12 1 year ago
@bammbamm12 You'll notice no one ever gives a shit what you think because your head is clogged with nonsense. So no, no one will be bothering to keep you posted.
nilbud 1 year ago
@nilbud - you're a loser. It's written all over you.
bammbamm12 1 year ago 2
Strange .. ! All Daphne's body language , hand gestures etc. seem to indicate evasion or deception when she addresses the chem-trail question. This could be because she is trying to sound knowledgeable about something of which she knows nothing. Or ..... ?
soulwam 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite says:
"I looked all of this up already thank you very much."
"what scientists have found are just industrial pollutants."
Yes, Nano sized aluminum particles with live viruses in them have been gathered from directly behind the planes and Independently lab tested.
Verified, confirmed, ignored.
Just like those RIFD Chips.... all crazy, impossible, doesn't exist.
watch?v=_pi21hdVv1k
GnosticNinja 1 year ago
@GnosticNinja ROFL, what's it like being a retard?
nilbud 1 year ago
@nilbud I'm sure only you would know.
I'm so stupid I'm not qualified to answer.
GnosticNinja 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite "Idiotic" is talking out your ass not knowing in fact that Hemp absorbs metric shit-loads of Co2 all night long more than any other plant.
More than can be produced by the burning of it..
... and so you were imagining what???
"There is so much wrong with this idea."
Yes it is true, Hemp would ruin the TOXIC monopoly production base of everything; from plastics, fuel, clothes, concrete, housing lumber, medicine et al.
More pollution & Co2 please!
ILL INFORMED
GnosticNinja 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite I spend 8 years living in Europe and the sky was full of chemtrails all the time, then move to India, no chemtrails, now I'm in Argentina, no chemtrails, so yes, there are chemtrails in the NATO countries, what they are I don't know, but they are there
kurydebarcelona 1 year ago
@kurydebarcelona Yeah , I've seen them in England. Something I observed before I had heard anyone talking about them. I spend time outdoors looking at things. It is surprising how few people look and see what is happening in their environment, yet the people who not go out and wander and gaze do love to have an opinion about such things.
soulwam 1 year ago
@soulwam you are so right on point
kurydebarcelona 1 year ago
@kurydebarcelona
it can be part, in some aspects of its potential uses, of the anti missile shield system. It is said they can elevate the conductivity of the atmosphere by spraying certain metal particles so their new ELF detection and communication system are enhanced. Now ionizing a jet plane's frame will no longer make it stealth like with the older radars.
all these systems are very destructive to health and are the true cause of illness attributed to climate change(cancers)
EasternGateGuardian 1 year ago 2
@ReignbowSmite
lmfao
you are sadly misinformed
do some history
before hemp was prohibited it was a major competitor of the oil industry
it can be turned into food fuel and burns carbon neutral so no green house effect
learn about henry fords hemp powered fleet
before cars hemp was the required crop on a percentage of every farm because it was so important in use for everything from cancer cure to sail cloth
you are really misinformed and i suggest you learn more about hemps uses
peace
psychodrilla 1 year ago
I'm unsubscribing... the "real" news is far too one-sided. there's never any debate. While I am concerned about pollution, I'm no longer concerned over so-called warming...
funnyguise 1 year ago
@Timeofflux Before any air breathing animal walked the earth, the oxygen level on earth could not sustain any mammals. The atmosphere was saturated with CO2.Then plants and marine algae started trapping the CO2 and the millions of year latter it was buried for ever in the dept of the earth, or was it. Then men started taking it back out (oil) and so we are re-releasing it back in the atmosphere. Why don't we just keep on sucking that CO2 out of the ground and see what will happens.
boumar19721972 1 year ago
@boumar19721972 Watch: /watch?v=jqxENMKaeCU
boumar19721972 1 year ago
@TheRealNews why not collaborate with greenman3610 if you want to do climate change stuff.
check out his YouTube channel & the videos he makes.
ejbh3160 1 year ago
The question should have been about stratospheric geo-engineering
con-trails evaporate behind the plane
It has nothing to do with 'altitude'
chem trails are due to the 'pollutants' creating a 'seed' for the moisture to form a droplet & thus man-made clouds
Even the climate change 'sceptics' argue that water vapour is the biggest greenhouse gas so even if they're just 'con' trails, it MUST have an effect.
The number of con-trails worldwide must reflect sunlight to space & so less gets to ground
ejbh3160 1 year ago
@ejbh3160 .... but don't cloud cover keep the heat in..!
redrik09 1 year ago 2
@redrik09 only low-level cloud... cumulus... Stratospheric clouds (sirrus) actually do more to reflect sunlight back into space (especially when it's just a 'haze' & then of course less sunlight reaches the ground so the lady's comments about plants was also correct.
ejbh3160 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@ejbh3160 . What about the plants..? don't you try telling me.. "trees release alot more carbon than they store.." .. as stated by the lady.
redrik09 1 year ago
@redrik09 yes I picked up on that. zero point trees obviously. lol
However the natural carbon cycle is well understood... & we are even a part of it in more ways than the air we breathe. The whole cycle of food/energy we get to live & the air we breath & the carbon gas we breath out are all connected. Even the rotting food we don't eat releases carbon gas (Methane). In fact if we took all the bio-gas from our rubbish it would produce as much natural gas as we use today
ejbh3160 1 year ago
@ejbh3160 Thankfully some cities are taking that garbage and getting the methane. If we combined that methane collection with composting we could do a lot
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7 totally agree dude... imo bio-degradable stuff could be sorted in the home. Once the rotting stuff has been removed from 'garbage' it is much easier to sort the rest mechanically or by hand because it's dry.
In fact if all our 'food waste' & biodegradables were mixed with sewage in anaerobic digesters we could stop using gas from the ground! Have you seen the video on 'Fracking'? But then the fosil fuel cartels won't get a 'Bonus' at Christmas eh?
ejbh3160 1 year ago
@Verdenfell You're on drugs - this lady told you what's really happening and like a sheeple puppet you screamed and covered your eyes and said "NO TRUTH FOR ME! NOOOOOOO"
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@ejbh3160
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
AgothInnCloth
very weird put possible...I have seen myself the ''orbs '' on four occasion and have taken pictures of them. always near or when a screen of aerosols have been sprayed...the so-called ''project blue beam'' sounds far off, but the technologies are in place for such a grand subterfuge...our microwave cellphones towers have many potential uses...from crowd control to direct tower to eardrums bone communications...oh and microwaves interact with water in the air ofc...spammersDIE
EasternGateGuardian 1 year ago
wikileaks is a BIG SCAM...watch?v=0fVyhfNNgrQ (Sex, Lies, Iran, Israel and WikiLeaks)
the truth is out finally!!! open thy eyes wide if you have them to see!
EasternGateGuardian 1 year ago 2
Oh no! Chemtrail bullshit again. The real danger is coming out of your cars rear. And the atomic waste we will dump someday somewhere.
pcuimac 1 year ago
i.ve watched them spraying, you got a lot to learn about chemtrails.
BluesdesJours 1 year ago 3
If jessy the body vantura says its true....... its true, end of story
YamaKazoo 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite The very same type and group of people who are carrying america into this climate change are the same type and group of people who allowed and created the atomic bomb, then dropped it on innocent people. Weapons of mass destruction exist all over and in the hands of people not afraid to use them, but you so eagerly defend them. I guess questioning authority is bad right? The IPCC fraud came out in 26,000 emails. I don't think that is going away any time soon, even if you want it.
Jbarrtndrsr 1 year ago
Daphne Wysham is quite the hotty! A well versed and informed one to boot.
6of6 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite Scientist have found sulfate, aluminum dioxide, Bromium and other dangerous chems from chemtrails over Mt. Shasta. So why the little concern from the guest? The chemtrails are obviously not contrail which disapear right away. The chemtrails leave an yellow, mucky sky -covering in the evening. I have been seeing this for years now. Maybe people should look up.
outthr 1 year ago
@outthr They don't exist you clown. Your "evidence" is nonsense.
nilbud 1 year ago
Simple science for simple people tells you that ice crystals form which is true. They also dissipate quickly. If you see one still in the air after a few minutes and think that is a contrail then you should get off youtube and spend more time learning some science.
Smarterthanyouarable 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Smarterthanyouarable
Jeeze again, - the length of time it takes to disipate a contrail is determined by the conditions in the atmosphere. In the right temperature and humidity they can stick around for some time; you should "spend more time learning some science." yourself.
Rundstedt1 1 year ago
@Smarterthanyouarable No you ignorant savage it's a contrail you gullible paranoid shithead. Who told you school was optional?
nilbud 1 year ago
@nilbud Go play a video game adults are trying to talk here. If you don't remember what contrails look like you can't be over 15.
Smarterthanyouarable 1 year ago
psychodrilla 1 year ago
first call-------------chemtrails---well, well--------------no scientific proof---guess you would have to do the studies-----please see "what in the world are they spraying"
HappyTeacherESQ 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite well she has a point with the abnormal airplane trails that dont dissipate until after like 30minutes. I have seen these things first hand. now the top of it making the days shorter....I dont think that there is a link up with that.
lasheron 1 year ago
@lasheron
Sigh, - The length of time it takes for contrails to dissipate is determined by the conditions of the atmosphere. No mystery about it, just science. Under the correct conditions they can persist for some time. And as Reighbow stated already, it is impossible for the length of the days to change by spraying anything in the atmosphere, you would need a shift in the rotation of the planet.
Rundstedt1 1 year ago
@Rundstedt1
These particles are not naturally forming, nor are Contrails that last 10+ hours forming a dull grayish haze in rare cases dropping a web-like snot upon the Earth casing a rampant epidemic of Flu-like symptoms where it lands.
"No mystery about it, just science."
GnosticNinja 1 year ago
What is this blaming Canada for the tar sands. I believe that they are representing the interests of US owned oil companies. Canada does not even get enough oil revenue to cover the infrastructure upgrade costs that will accompany the tar sands development.
asoon1 1 year ago
be wary of disinformation ops
zachariahiawatha 1 year ago
Yes Reignbow... that must be why all our soil samples show barium and aluminum oxide in our soils and air quality. It's all our imagination... I've been on 4 antibiotics and nothing gets rid of this crap living in our bodies. Barium and aluminum oxide plaque the lungs and cause cancer, this is why many of the nuts who are spraying this on us via Evergreen Aviation here in the US are getting cancer from handling this crap on their planes. Sounds like pure Karma to me.
tondalea 1 year ago
@tondalea (1/2)
"Barium is surprisingly abundant in the Earth's crust, being the 14th most abundant element. High amounts of barium may only be found in soils and in food, such as nuts, seaweed, fish and certain plants.
Because of the extensive use of barium in the industries human activities add greatly to the release of barium in the environment. As a result barium concentrations in air, water and soil may be higher than naturally occurring concentrations on many locations.
Rundstedt1 1 year ago
@tondalea (2/2)
Barium enters the air during mining processes, refining processes, and during the production of barium compounds. It can also enter the air during coal and oil combustion."
-
So if you're concerned about Barium in the environment it's not because of spraying it in the air but industrialization and it's use. So you should support alternative energy like Solar. Otherwise just put your tinfoil hat back or you only prove your deluded.
Rundstedt1 1 year ago
@tondalea You need HSO's from
'Garden of Life' formula.
Anti-Biotics are exactly the opposite of Pro-Biotics.
Like using a hammer to get bird shit off of your car.
GnosticNinja 1 year ago
@tondalea 4 anti-biotics? Do you even know what those are for? For bacterial infections. So barium and aluminum have nothing to do with that.
You need to see a real doctor, not a witch-doctor.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
Comment removed
lllraverslll 1 year ago
There is no global warming. So all this is ridiculous.
bammbamm12 1 year ago
@bammbamm12 Don't get caught up in there propaganda man. There is global warming and there is global cooling, but the constant misuse of these common terms create this type of issue we have now with extremist environmentalism. Next they'll call me out on it all, but I'm merely agreeing with you in the sense that what mainstream says is utterly false. These cheese heads on the other hand apparently believe everything at face value. Agenda, Agenda, Agenda. The hockey stick graph is bullshit.
Jbarrtndrsr 1 year ago 2
@Jbarrtndrsr gobal warming is a real fact. The hockey-stick graph is, however, total bullshit - good call
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@bammbamm12 ... take no notice of ReignbowSmite .." You can lead a horse to water.. but you can't make it drink.." .. " If everyone is pointing at the sky.. only a fool would not look up .."
redrik09 1 year ago
@redrik09 If you can con everyone into looking at the sky they will not notice what is going on here on the ground.
Smarterthanyouarable 1 year ago
@bammbamm12 there is more global warming now than ever before in human history.
Get off the drugs.
And get a thermometer. And check the real data from NASA - it shows 2010 is the hottest year on record for human history. PERIOD.
Wake up sheeple you are a zombie obeying your orders to Consume and Obey and Breed. Obey. Moron !!
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7 Can you explain then why Phil Jones (creator of Gores hockey stick) said in a BC interview over how he managed to lose all that data that there has been no global warming since 1995 and global cooling since 2003?
Smarterthanyouarable 1 year ago
@Smarterthanyouarable of course I can explain it - it's a huge lie. The data is NOT missing and there has been global warming the whole time. Check with NASA, the data is public, it is available. Check with NOAA, public and available. Check with Environment Canada, public and available. No secrets here - to not understand this is public and available and has been the entire time is nonsensical. There has not been global cooling and all claims there have been are a fraud and a farce.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago 2
@ytgv3fc7 Phil Jones BBC Feb 13 2010 :B - Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming. "Yes, but only just." There is a little find it kind of thingy called a search engine. Play with one sometimes.
Smarterthanyouarable 1 year ago
@Smarterthanyouarable epic fail - search engines can bring you any false result you want by going to nonsense quotes.
I just flagged your name in a reply to another video you didn't look at and in your email notification you can go TO the video (young turks) and this will clarify your fantasy nonsense there has been global cooling. There has not been.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago 3
@ytgv3fc7 If you are to lazy to get off your happy ass to learn something then warn us before we waste any time with you. You could have searched the BBC site just as easily. That is the lamest excuse for mental laziness I have heard. A google search can bring a million hits and it does not take much effort to find one you deem credible. To make that argument and use TYT as an example of a credible source is just fucking embarrassing. You should delete your comment in my opinion.
Smarterthanyouarable 1 year ago
@Smarterthanyouarable My comment is so incredibly important I think I will give it a thumbs up and flag yours for spam.
ytgv3fc7 9 months ago
@ytgv3fc7 Mark as spam? I cut a fucking bullet out of leg with a pocket knife. How much of a pussy do you have to be to flag someone because they disagree with you?
Smarterthanyouarable 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Smarterthanyouarable You're full of shit. You're a fraud & a liar so you get marked as spam
ytgv3fc7 8 months ago
"In fact, dozens of cities set cold-weather records for July 2009,
according to the National Weather Service."
(no W's)blog*cleveland*com/metro/2009/08/coldest_july_on_record_through*html
W's*skepticalscience*com/December-2009-record-cold-spells*htm
W's*ncdc*noaa*gov/sotc/national/2009/10
W's*newser*com/story/77439/cold-spell-sets-record-lows*html
W's*stuff*co*nz/world/europe/4401189/Britain-gripped-by-cold-snap
GnosticNinja 1 year ago
@GnosticNinja cold snaps in winter, not summer, are part of global warming as part of the average increase - e.g. if this year is average warmer +1 and summer is average warmer by 5 degrees then you can expect something like a -4 in the winter compared to the previous year.
It has to be cold every summer and every winter every year for you to be right and it isn't so you're not.
Summer brought record heat and the year over-all is record hotter and has been every year so you're still wrong.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago 2
ytgv3fc7 says: "over-all is record hotter and has been every year so you're still wrong."
(noW's)boards*fool*com/arctic-summer-coldest-on-record-28672191*aspx
W's*portlandtribune*com/news/story*php?story_id=128336409146164600
W's*topix*com/forum/world/australia/TA0062TF9AAEMDSV9
GnosticNinja 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7
Give it up, you deluded green jackass!
There is no man-made global warming!
They just made it up because morons like you would believe it!
bofors7715 1 year ago
@bofors7715 get off the drugs, retard! No one made up global warming, it's a proven fact. I replied to you in another video which points it out as it has been pointed out OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN - GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL AND MORONS WHO DRINK DRAINO AND HIT THEIR SKULLS WITH HAMMERS, such as yourself are the ONLY MORONS ON THE ENTIRE PLANET WHO SAY global warming is not real.
2 teeth, 50 IQ or less. Hoaxers are a hoax
GET OFF THE DRUGS YOU IDIOT
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7 says: "It has to be cold every summer"
(noW's)wattsupwiththat*com/2010/08/01/sea-ice-news-16/#more-22877
HOW does furthering the economic subjugation
of humanity fix Global War...erm... (I mean) "Climate Change ™"??
How does graciously showering the inbred self appointed "rulers" of Earths inhabitants with even more ill gotten gains EVER going to fix the factually recorded yet ending cycle of the SAME EXACT occurrence found on all the other planets in our Solar System???
GnosticNinja 1 year ago
@GnosticNinja "SAME EXACT occurrence found on all the other planets in our Solar System???"
Fraud. None of this is true. The other planets are not in any way heating or cooling as the Earth is.
ytgv3fc7 9 months ago
@ytgv3fc7 really? please show your sources ie: the scientific peer reviewed publications
gavhof 8 months ago
@gavhof really: you need peer reviewed evidence to show the planets ARE heating, not the other way around. The burden of proof is on you, the claimant. The only source of heating energy is the sun in our solar system. We'd be charred black before pluto got any heat increase; same for Neptune to get a 1 degree increase. Inverse square law: go look it up. For every linear distance closer, the power increase is SQUARED (watts per meter squared of solar energy).
ytgv3fc7 6 months ago
@ytgv3fc7 It's also worth pointing out that the surface temperature on Venus is greater than on Mercury despite Mercury being much closer to the sun because of, gasp/shock/horror/, the greenhouse effect.
MechanizedCaffeine 4 months ago
@MechanizedCaffeine THANK you, I've been so busy with my stock market & fraud-analysis stuff I have not recalled that fact in quite some time ;)
ytgv3fc7 4 months ago
Does Canada not have its own refineries? Why send it to Texas?
cory2146 1 year ago
@cory2146 Stupidity, that's what oil is all about.
yuri35435 1 year ago
@yuri35435 best get a replacement for oil, then, or get rid of a lot of the world's population. no other way. Go on then.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@cory2146 we have no refineries in Canada. I insist we should have them, other people say No. It's nonsense and it's costing our economy DEARLY. WE could cut our gasoline costs in half by having our own refineries.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
Comment removed
jag10 1 year ago
er...I don't like this chick already. sounds a little like controlled opposition to be able to dismiss the geoengineered chemtrails, with her answer. That did not answer that lady' question at all. If you would like some info try "what in the world are they spraying?". Talks about geoengineering, that IS going on regardless of this UN treaty to ban them(which btw proved they exist). You can also try Dennis Kucinichs' HR2977 for some official use of chemtrail usage(was not signed into law).
Jbarrtndrsr 1 year ago
@Jbarrtndrsr
HR2977 had NOTHING to do with your silly tin foil hat stuff. It was about not being able to base weapons in space like Nuclear platforms and satellite destroyers.
From the Bill stating its purpose:
"To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons."
Rundstedt1 1 year ago
@Rundstedt1 Ok, but however it does put emphasis on the term "CHEMTRAILS". So apparently I'm using a tin foil hat when I speak about that? It is talking about technotronic weapons. I'm merely pointing to the FACT they exist. Try getting a copy of ecoscience, from obama czar John Holdren or The grand checkboard. Perhaps you need to reread my post. Geoengineering exists dude and not to mention the U.N. and it's moratorium on it all. Keep sleeping harcore man, it'll make you happy in the end.
Jbarrtndrsr 1 year ago
Its important that people learn real facts. This Church of Consperiology and its dogma of Denialism will bring the extinction of the human race if they win.
TheNewRenaissance 1 year ago
Reignbow those are contrails. They evaporate in about 20 minutes. "Chemtrails" stay in the sky for many hours. There are about 8 million pictures online of them criss crossing the sky. WAKE UP!! Forget simple science and find common sense
15jstone 1 year ago
@15jstone
How long a vapor trail stays around depends on the condintions of the atmposphere. If condensation trail sticks around depends on the ambient humidity. If humidity is low, contrails will rapidly dissipate, looking like a comet's tail. The ice particles sublimate; meaning to go straight from ice to vapor; and you're back to blue sky. If humidity is high, however, contrails can persist quite a long time. All you are seeing is vapor trails and don't understand the sceince behind it.
Rundstedt1 1 year ago
okay... what happens to climate chem trails? nobody seems to know or they certainly do not know... yet no questions are asked debated and spoken... if you want to talk about neural toxins look at chem trails...
ceomeye 1 year ago
So you are saying that the climate will warm up by 4 degrees Celsius in 100 years. Wow. Meteorology has really improved since I am used to not knowing what the weather will be like next week. You know when the meteorologist on the news claims that tomorrow will be clear and sunny, when it turns out to be cold and rainy.
raguila11 1 year ago
@raguila11 Climate and weather while related, are VERY different. Weather is what is going on now and in a day or two. Climate is a pattern of weather over very long extended measurable periods.
dvictorbrown 1 year ago
I was going to un subscribe from this dis information channel a while ago but its done now. They know what is going on, please tell me everyone else can see through their BS. He pretended he didn't know what they were! If you subscribe, un subscribe, you dont need another avenue of BS! If anyone one wants more info please ask. Keep Sharp people and don't be fooled
OlisharV 1 year ago 2
Ok, We call yur bluff Duhmeruka, go git yur oil frum the Middle Esat.
Well B here when you come back to yur senses but the price will have gone up!
Sincerely,
KANADA
Darkhorse21x 1 year ago
Crank it up 15 degrees I live in Northern Canada
dave777blaster 1 year ago
@Reignbow
It's good to see someone rational and reality based here. Keep it up. I know it's not easy and frustrating. I mean, good grief, they don't even know what condensation is; let alone global climate change. I suppose when they see an old documentary about the bombing of Germany and see the waves of planes with vapor trails that those bombers were somehow also carrying tons of some chemical to spray. People who lost their tin-foil hats should just stay away from ANYTHING marked a REAL
Rundstedt1 1 year ago
@Rundstedt1
S/B - "it's not easy and [can be] frustrating..."
Rundstedt1 1 year ago
@Timeofflux Well my grandmother has been smoking since the age of 19 and she's 78 now. And that is true. And she has not been diagnosed with cancer yet so that means scientists are wrong.Cigarettes doesn't cause cancer. Right. So they must be wrong about climate change too!
boumar19721972 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite I am not trolling you. I am just dumbfounded by the attitude of some skeptics like you,that since what they know is true and based on evidence,they expect the world should suddenly all get it at once.Yeah wake up,War is obviously madness yet it is still there, Politicians are fraudsters but they still have their Job. Knowing something is not enough if you are a bloody rude and arrogant person. I wont comment on you anymore, you can save your efforts for the Lulz only. thinking
graphattic 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite ... as for the trails of vapour.. when I grow up.. they would disappear within 3-5 mins... now they are there for hours and hours..
redrik09 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite Check out 300 times more aluminum in drinking water.. or something like that.. 2.10am in the Uk.. I'm to tired to Carry on chatting with you.. if you wish I will check-out the aluminum thing and get back with a link.. later.
redrik09 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite I assume the woman has some intelligence.. she must of ment the daylight hours seem shorter.. I don't think she means they are pulling the world of it's axis..maybe she feels.. she used to have more sun.. and can't describe her natural feelings.. for it.
redrik09 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite Okays then, before I kindly fuck off, one last thing. If you kept trying and nothing came out of it, did it occur to you you and others similarly did something very wrong in the process? If you just repeat what you hold true to people that dont, they will not suddenly change beliefs. Certain penetrative and social skills are required. If you dont have the patience or the skill to do that, then you kindly fuck off, cause you are making things worse rather than better.
graphattic 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite .... then you should watch the video I personally took.. on my Phone in cornwall uk .. I think I posted it here earlier.. we have large open skies herein cornwall.. you can see for miles.. you can see the chemtrail.. trails across the sky.. maybe you live in the city and only see 30-40 foot of sky at a time..or maybe you know it's true.. but it's too frightening..
redrik09 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite Yeah, only you are both wrong. Neither the video constitutes evidence, nor evidence of any activity of this nature would ever become public. ReignBow you seem to expect people to Be judges and prosecutors if they wanna express an opinion. Since evidence is neither conclusive nor available, they only rational path is to pressure politicians and organizations to have a transparent inquiry. Saying "there is no evidence" in such matters is like saying you do not give a shit.
graphattic 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite I am practising what I "preach" to you. Problem is I am only one asshole. I would prefer that less arrogant, more contructive efforts were carried out by ALL sceptics, cause that would make a real change in the world, far beyond any effect I can have by myself. Your fucking YT armchair is a war chariot if you use it correctly. Telling others they are idiots and they believe in bullshit is not constructive. Trying to stand honestly in one's shoes and then discuss with them does.
graphattic 1 year ago