He said it was "a recession is suppose to be two negative months of GDP"... which proves he doesn't know what a recession is. It is commonly defined as 'two Consequitive QUARTERS of a DECLINE in GDP....' What an imbecile.
Asking the President hard questions is unpatriotic, Fight them there so we don't have to fight them here. Yeah, George Orwell was a real Nostrildammits, wasn't he. Next on the agenda....Thought Crimes!!!
Rupert Murdoch doesn't want to lose money and the RNC has been rejected by the majority of Americans. I read a headline yesterday saying "Henpecked Murdoch turning to a liberal slant"... I've heard it all now.
yes there was a dispute over what was a recession and you sourced Greenspan in support of your arguement when in fact HIS(Greenspan) opinion was that we were in a recession. You used that to argue that we were not, may not or that the definition was vague, just like every rubber stamp Republican for Bush who were spinning that the economy was good.
You were wrong, very wrong and should admit it. Get this schmuck out of office.
Chambliss still gets it wrong. A recession IS NOT "two consecutive months of negative growth." A recession is defined as "two consecutive QUARTERS of negative growth." There is NO DISAGREEMENT among economists about thus definition. It IS THE DEFINITION.
chris wallace is one of the actual reporters at Fox News
chrisbotron 2 years ago
He said it was "a recession is suppose to be two negative months of GDP"... which proves he doesn't know what a recession is. It is commonly defined as 'two Consequitive QUARTERS of a DECLINE in GDP....' What an imbecile.
Axekick11 3 years ago
Wow i guess someone has to be "fair and balanced" at Fixed News
beserker45 3 years ago
Notice the pattern.
"We're A Nation of Whiners" ... "We May Not Be In A Recession"
lapdogs 3 years ago
Asking the President hard questions is unpatriotic, Fight them there so we don't have to fight them here. Yeah, George Orwell was a real Nostrildammits, wasn't he. Next on the agenda....Thought Crimes!!!
Plutonwolf 3 years ago
I can't believe Chris Wallace acted like a real and honest reporter! I'm shocked. Maybe Obama fever has spread a tad to the Fake News Channel...
johnnycash1 3 years ago
Rupert Murdoch doesn't want to lose money and the RNC has been rejected by the majority of Americans. I read a headline yesterday saying "Henpecked Murdoch turning to a liberal slant"... I've heard it all now.
Axekick11 3 years ago
Wow! Chris Wallace actually did something good!
crimsong19 3 years ago
Thats my senator. sigh.
StephinRazin 3 years ago
Don't feel bad, I had slick Rick Santorum for far too long. Just keep trying, sooner or later you CAN hit the wicked witch with a pail full of water!
Plutonwolf 3 years ago
Maybe we're being too hard on him. Maybe what it is is that Saxby Chambliss just doesn't know what a 'fiscal quarter' is. Not everyone does.
It's not one month; it's three.
ReliableInsider 3 years ago
yes there was a dispute over what was a recession and you sourced Greenspan in support of your arguement when in fact HIS(Greenspan) opinion was that we were in a recession. You used that to argue that we were not, may not or that the definition was vague, just like every rubber stamp Republican for Bush who were spinning that the economy was good.
You were wrong, very wrong and should admit it. Get this schmuck out of office.
daderone 3 years ago
He just exposed himself.
bestservice1983 3 years ago
Chambliss still gets it wrong. A recession IS NOT "two consecutive months of negative growth." A recession is defined as "two consecutive QUARTERS of negative growth." There is NO DISAGREEMENT among economists about thus definition. It IS THE DEFINITION.
Chambliss is an idiot and a liar,
Richardgwm 3 years ago 2
The problem is not the politicans; the problem is the people. Numb and dumb. This country is finished.
VeracityMedia 3 years ago
I thought it was 2 consecutive quarters of 'negative growth'.
leitermann 3 years ago 3