also...could we tweek our brain to catch frequencies we sould not? This theory is a pandora box for metaphisical, paranormal and spiritual understanding....Have i smoked too much weed ? Now you tell me. =)
if i get it right ...i could use this to create an hologram of some sort to cover my real identity. If the frequency is not stable enough due to magnetic or supra phisical phenomenas...could i shiftshape ? Very interesting !
The sampling frequency should be greater than twice the bandwidth of the input signal in order to reconstruct the orignal signal as an output signal from the sampled version.
All the negative comments prove that you did a good job Amishman35 xD
mabonvin3 9 months ago
You didn't explain why.It should be because of aliases.Ugh
ofembe 1 year ago
Yes, but that doesn't explain why we'd have to sample double what we can hear?!
TheMrChugger 1 year ago
also...could we tweek our brain to catch frequencies we sould not? This theory is a pandora box for metaphisical, paranormal and spiritual understanding....Have i smoked too much weed ? Now you tell me. =)
Lepiratepoulpe 2 years ago
if i get it right ...i could use this to create an hologram of some sort to cover my real identity. If the frequency is not stable enough due to magnetic or supra phisical phenomenas...could i shiftshape ? Very interesting !
Lepiratepoulpe 2 years ago
This is actually really good, in a backwards sort of way.
Very good point: we may miss subtle ultra subsonic frequencies, which would help to fill music. Hmn....
kurisux 2 years ago
what a waist of time
wereismyballoon 2 years ago
The sampling frequency should be greater than twice the bandwidth of the input signal in order to reconstruct the orignal signal as an output signal from the sampled version.
That is alllllllllllllllllllllll i know,
Xiyad 2 years ago
The actual requirement is for the sampling rate is to be greater than twice the signal bandwidth.
Myrtone 2 years ago
bad joke...lol
deshawnpenrose 2 years ago
you talk funny
roflcopterdeluxe 2 years ago
Incredible
timdrage 2 years ago
wtf?
rafail18 3 years ago 2
I wonder if Shannon Nyquist from Bells labs would find this funny.
Avionicgenius 2 years ago
that's "Claude Shannon", dumbass.
hypnotekk 2 years ago
I was talking about two people...
No need for you slander thank you
Avionicgenius 2 years ago
shame your genius in Avionics doesn't extend into grammar.
hypnotekk 2 years ago