Added: 3 years ago
From: Amishman35
Views: 1,814
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • All the negative comments prove that you did a good job Amishman35 xD

  • You didn't explain why.It should be because of aliases.Ugh

  • Yes, but that doesn't explain why we'd have to sample double what we can hear?!

  • also...could we tweek our brain to catch frequencies we sould not? This theory is a pandora box for metaphisical, paranormal and spiritual understanding....Have i smoked too much weed ? Now you tell me. =)

  • if i get it right ...i could use this to create an hologram of some sort to cover my real identity. If the frequency is not stable enough due to magnetic or supra phisical phenomenas...could i shiftshape ? Very interesting !

  • This is actually really good, in a backwards sort of way.

    Very good point: we may miss subtle ultra subsonic frequencies, which would help to fill music. Hmn....

  • what a waist of time

  • The sampling frequency should be greater than twice the bandwidth of the input signal in order to reconstruct the orignal signal as an output signal from the sampled version.

    That is alllllllllllllllllllllll i know,

  • The actual requirement is for the sampling rate is to be greater than twice the signal bandwidth.

  • bad joke...lol

  • you talk funny

  • Incredible

  • wtf?

  • I wonder if Shannon Nyquist from Bells labs would find this funny.

  • that's "Claude Shannon", dumbass.

  • I was talking about two people...

    No need for you slander thank you

  • shame your genius in Avionics doesn't extend into grammar.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more