Four witnesses out of how many? Where were they when it happened? If they didn't see the planes, then it would be logical for them to think that the explosion was caused by a bomb. There are thousands of other witnesses that say it was a plane.
The "no planes theory" is absolutely one of the stupidest 9/11 conspiracy theories. Right up there with "the Jews did it" theory. How hard is it to accept the obvious cause of these events? Al Qaeda hijacked four planes and crashed them into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and the field in Pennsylvania. Any other explanations are just ridiculous.
@TimothyRaymond1 Yeah.. and the hijackers were not on the passengerlists and magically later they were. They managed to hijack 4 planes with boxcutters, tear gass and plastic knives, and none of the pilots were able to send the 4 digit emergency code that a hijacking was going on? They used tear gass inside a small space. Well, then they probably would have gassmasks on them, don't you think? They managed to get all this shit through the US customs... Good luck with your fairytale!
WHY ? Is The Reporter Asking everyone to Spell their Last name ??? He sounds like a Government Plant ! No normal reporter would be interested in that detail. He's a fucken employee of the Scumbags who blew up the towers !
we should not only think about 9/11 we should talk about whats coming next !? what did the secret services planted next ... and why did they melt down the euro ? stop the war were in
stop the false media .. dont believe anything of that crap
the real human media .. with clearly information about what people need
and how we can respect eachother ... that is what the world needs !
and not any wapons or nuclear strikes ! thats insane
1:22 "we went to the stair case, to try to get down, we were going down, we got stuck on the floor because the door to the stair case woudn't open"
People question the story of William Rodriguez who was a janitor for WTC 1 and saved 15 people. He had one of the keys for the stair case exits because only 1 fire exit would open out of 4. This was to maintain the flow of people out of the building.
im not even american but i get pissed off at the people who still think it was a terrorist attack, you dumb fucks need to open your ears and listen to what the actual experts have to say not what the tv tells you, brainwashed idoits!
remember we Americans are the same nation that voted for that fraudulent phony elitist stooge Osama Obama as our president , the most inexperienced unqualified president in American history
Has anyone noticed that there is only one man w soot around his nose & mouth, who seems shaken? in '93 (btw, 93 is masonic number) I was made aware that people exiting the fiery blg had soot under his/her nose & mouth. 2 witnesses seem too calmn, 1 gets in an SUV (delivery person?), 1 is sweaty, looks like Central Park.
@SpecAgentRPMcMurphy i agree with you 100%...everyone always calls us "sheep" for "believing everything we're told," well the conspiracy theorists were "told" its a conspiracy as well...they're believing everything they're told too
@poonkinator Sorry pook....I believed what the government told me at first...then I studied and researched things for myself and came to the realization the "official" story does not add up. Do I want to believe our leaders lied to cover things up? No I dont WANT to believe it...but there are too many instances in the past that MAKE me believe something was covered up. Too many unanswered questions...too amny things not addressed...too many things left out of the explanation.
@unafraidtruther all you did was do research on OTHER peoples work. Did you go to NYC make measurements, plug them into physical equations, interview eyewitnesses and politicians? If you did that by yourself then no youre not believing what people told you. Im not saying it wasnt some sort of conspiracy because yes there are things that don't add up, but some of things people are proposing are the most retarded things Ive ever heard IN MY LIFE. And I'm a volunteer for the special olympics lol
@poonkinator I totally agree some things are preposterous and no I did not do any scientific research nor interview any politicians. I'm going on the non-included testimonies, the obvious video inconsistencies and facts that are left out or plainly ignored. The 9/11 commission admitted to having their hands tied and the media has undoubtedly shown what they seem to have been told to show. As I said too many unanswered questions.
Siiiiiiiiiigh 8 years and counting... almost 9 now an the 9/11 bowel movement has yet to provide a SINGLE DEINITIVE ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION for the events of 9/11 despite the mountains of SHIT they call evidence of an inside job
You guys, I've had a thought, and if your ever losing hope in society because our news stations still refuse to expose September 11th, then read on.
All the angry people you see fighting so desperately to deny it being the government one day HAVE to realize it was a demolition job because it's obvious. When all these people have realized they've been double-crossed, I'm happy that their anger will be on our side. Peace.
And at the pentagon, the only witnesses to a plane were all producers from USATODAY who were all conveniently late to work, and who were all conveniently within 1/4 mile from each other. And the video tape that had been confiscated by FBI and was returned by Freedom of information act SHOWED ZERO PLANES, but was aimed at where they claim the plane wen.
Ok. I can buy the Pentagon attack was very weird. All the information about it that is out there to provide answers has just raised more questions.
But come on. Do you really believe in some massive worldwide conspiracy that controls the media? You (and all the other "truthers") would have been excellent script writers for the X-Files.
Not even Fox Mulder or the Lone Gunman were that paranoid.
You need to say...That you are a shill. A person paid to spread the official lie. You know people who actually saw the "plane" crash at the exact moment of impact are all connected to the Media. Everyone else just saw planes fly by. There were definitely planes in the sky-that's no lie, but zero planes impacted the twin towers. And yet 3 ,yes 3 giant skyscrapers fell down at the World Trade Center. INVESTIGATE. ACT.
So I am being paid to spread lies? Damn. Guess my secret is out now.
Seriously though do you honestly believe that everyone who was in New York and saw it happen are lying? Thats crazy. Thousands witnessed it right in front of their eyes and millions were watching it on TV.
I am no fan of the government especially politicians but they are not the enemy.
al-Qaeda is and don't try and tell me that radical islam is made up too because they do exist and they hate this country.
@sir4ki the government would not be able to pay MILLIONS of people enough to keep their mouths shut...millions of New yorkers said they legitimately saw planes hit the towers (and don't start with this new holographic plane bullshit) the others (the ones in which YOU are saying said "I saw a little something") probably didnt actually see the event take place, they probably heard the explosion, looked up and saw the towers on fire. Simple as that
The witnesses at 2:29 says "there was a big impact" that would be the plane, then says "we were below the explosion", that would be the fuel in the plane exploding on "impact". When he talks about the "last one" he is speaking of the last terriorist attack.
Not difficult to understand people.
These people were interviewed within moments and were inside the building not seeing the plane. You could very well assume a bomb thinking back to the first bombing in early 90s.
Why do Americans believe this was caused by planes? You will be hard pressed to find anyone outside the US who believes that this was the cause.
Most International media outlets were there for the second explosion and none of us saw a plane. Here in Australia people quickly concluded from the evidence that it was an inside job and time has only confirmed the suspicion.
Its an unfortunate truth that if you want to know what is going on in America you have to step outside of it.
No. As i just said, that is not what we saw (live) at all. We certainly saw nothing else but that later in the day and forever since - but, no, my friend, i watched the live coverage and not even those on the scene reported seeing a plane until much later - including NBC's own anchors.
i was 6 years old and my dad was walking to school with me and flight 11 flew right over us. it was unusually low. so i watched it and we saw it fly right into the tower and explode. we were already late so we went to battery park and watched from there. a few minutes later the other plane hit. thats when we realized it was terrorists. we ran back to our apartment and watched the rest from my bedroom window. there was so much dust from the collapse we were trapped inside until later that night.
yes, FOUR people say they didnt see any planes but four MILLION other people (such as myself) can tell you different!!! shithead. god im so sick of people find the most trivial details they can and basing their entire opinion on them and proceed to try to make everyone else agree with them.
Why do all people who say 911 fake inside job always shout abuse on here to others that have the opion it wasnt? as u can tell none of the pople in this video was in view of the outside and there fore didnt see the planes ! i cant see me arse hole but i have one! back ur therories up instead of slaggin peopke who dont agree with them no evidence of fake planes
And what evidence you have ? did they give the whole of new york lsd or somthing ? cgi a hlogram of planes commin in so the whole of new york can see bit far fetched to say the least and another thing i will even take into the consideraion of inside job ie they new it was comming ect but please face facts planes tookj those buildings down not cgi i have yet to hear 1 credible explosive expert say it was thermite as i know fam members who take buildings down ur vids give no vaild evidence
What an asshole reporter for channel 7 eyewitness news. Fucking people are hurt and bleeding and all they can do is stick a mike in their face. SCUMBAGS!
Anyone who thinks CNN and all other stations can edit live footage (including private camcorders) on the day with CGI planes is something of a lunatic..
And you got this "absolute proof" from whom.. a friend of yours or some official document stamped and approved by all concerned? This video chose 4 witnesses who didn't see planes. Many didn't, but most did. This story is biased without presenting both sides of the story. There's also some bull story about weapons from space that did it. So the stations somehow managed to edit the footage on private camcorders too now? C'mon..
If you were in the building you are not going see anything you moron. I was fucking three blocks away and saw the planes going into the buildings. If you can project visions into my eyes or CGI my eyesight then you are a better man than me. Typical fucking moron who thinks man did not land on the moon. Probablt live in BF no where. If you weren't there the shut the f up about cause you don't know !!!
ppls will believe everything tv say! if the Tv told them 1000 elephant hit the WTc they will believe it! Anyone with half a brain know that no plane hit the WTC it's graphic illusion!
These people are talking about the sounds of the collapse, they dont say anything about "no planes"! Why would the govt try to fake planes crashing in the most densely populated city in the US? Did they think "Nobody will notice"??? There were thousands and thousands of people looking DIRECTLY at the WTC when the 2nd plane crashed, how the hell can you honestly say that there were no planes? NO LOGIC!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
No-planers are discrediting the entire 9/11 truth movement. There were definitely planes crashing into the Twin Towers, though they weren't conventional airliners.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
can't believe how stupid people get.
just about every TV in the world aired the second crash live! and there were witnesses that saw the planes I've got relatives that saw the second plane. they said it's not a U.S. airliner tho.
Nobody has asked about the first video of the first plane. Go back and watch the video. Why is there a freaken cameraman there filming firemen staring at a stupid manhole! This seems suspicious in itself. Look at this! The cameraman just happens to be there whilst the first plane flies into the tower and he also is able to look up in the sky zoom the camera over to the tower and in the right direction to film the plane going in. Isn't city plumbing the NY works dept's job and not firemen's jobs?
Or even just to check wether they are in a good medical condition or not, when I crashed my bike the police asked me all those questions, just like: What date is it?, I'm not sure though
why do you think the people that say they heard the plane coming are actors?? What makes you think they aren't the ones telling the truth? THere is footage. I guess the world is flat too despite proof.
How do we know who is telling the truth unless we were actually there. I'm sure most of the actual victims were in too much shock to be of any valuable intelligence. There is way too much propaganda spread on both sides, but the simple fact is: the 9/11 commission report lacks intracacy and leaves many unanswered questions. Like the Warren Commision, this report in itself brings suspiscion upon the government and it's closest allies..
everyone keep saying 'there was a big impact'. but none says there was a sound of a airplane coming, or there was huge engine roaring before the explosion, but there was not! never less,only the paid actor aka witnesses said there was, there was, planes hitting the building. piece of sheet, check other videos where there is this one guy witnesses the plane hits wtc. but what's funny, he said he heard the airplane coming towards them because of the loud sound of the engines attract him ;-p actor'
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
of course there were planes, if there werent, then what happened to the planes that took off that day. did they just disapear? they found debris from the plane in the wreck afterward. this is so stupid
Check out the very EXISTENCE of the planes and LAX airport where relatives of the passengers families were to go to see what happened to their family members...also check out the video September Clues. I was on the fence til I saw that video. It will open your eyes to media involvement in a major way.
They easily can plant broken parts of planes, I feel bad for whoever still believes this had anything to do with planes and any government but our own.
this is the very reason why it's very easy to DUPE people like you.. you watch too much TV and became oblivious to the OVERWHELMING proof that 9/11 was Government Job supported by the Elites.
Thanks for the reply.. Well, actually, the Elites know very well that it ain't gonna be a perfect crime.. I always keep in mind that they are always 20 steps ahead of us.. And they hire the most brilliant minds in the world..
exacty! i mean, why do they have to make it so obvious all the time? 911, the first wtc bombing (was admitted by cia) london, madrid, oklahoma city, pentagon, pensylvania, princess diana ... i mean really?! cant they do just one thing right without a trace?
And one last thing u only showing what people saying frst hand and when in shock u dont get me wrong i will belive once i see sommat that backs the theory up with solid evidence
'Why do they have to make it so obvious all the time?
I think there are two reasons.
1. A conspiracy of this magnitude would be almost impossible to pull off without a trace.
2. I think they want us to know. It's like kicking a man when he's down. Millions know they did it, but by leaving so many clues, they're laughing in our faces.
@acorntechnique my god that is actually the best comment ive ever read here on youtube about 9-11. that totally sumz up evrything in one go, well dun, thats exactly wat ive bin tryin 2 tell these foolz. keep in tuch my frend, u seem intelligent like me.
@acorntechnique Absolutely..They expect people to b to lame to do anything. And thats their excuse to..And actually now 9 years after it looks like they are right..Buisness as ussual..Almost makes me wanna jump their wagon...I dont,, but man &%¤#&/%¤#&¤#
There is a huge truth movement going on - but like anything in this life, unless you get the support of the mass media, your movement has got almost no chance of making huge strides into the public domain.
The result?
9 years on and still most Americans truly believe that 911 was caused by 'foreign terrorists.'
911 was a staged event, conceived and enacted by the power elite in an effort to rally support from US citizens so that congress would agree to fund the Iraq war.
only reason i beleive this no plane story, is cuz in none of the live broadcast do you hear the reporter or anybody on the ground mention even seeing a plane.its only the ones in the newsroom who mention it,a plane that big and that loud had to get somebody's attention before impact but none of the videos show it.and you could digitally remove the plane from the film,but that means you can place a plane on the film also.
Umm, the plane hit so quickly that if you werent in its line of sight, or if you were INSIDE the building, you didnt see it. Pretty simple. And yet ANOTHER 9/11 conspiracy that looks stupid.
explain why the media fucked about with the images that day (watch September Clues) After the first ´plane´ hit surely more people would have been looking up no? Thats pretty simple too. And the footage of the second plane crashing was blurred out under headline banners...the live scoop of the century....cmon man somethin stunk there. Im jst askin wtf was all that shit about.
The City of New York does not imply approval of the listed destinations, warrant the accuracy of any information set out in those destinations, or endorse any opinions expressed therein. Like NYCgov, all other web sites operate under the auspices and at the direction of their respective owners who should be contacted directly with questions regarding the content of these sites.
The bit in the info bout the video that says check out the interview with guy who said it was a bomb, not worth anything, he said he saw everything etc but remember what just happened here! Watching live on TV, the first tower collapsed while bbc news was at the pentagon, angle of camera when it came back to NY obscured the collapse except for the dust and smoke and the reporter said about a bomb, seconds later footage quickly rewound live and then played forward to show what happened.confusion.
But if this is right, your whole system is fake. Not only the government, but the media too. Do you realize what that means?? Maybe the military wasn t involved, as high ranked generals denied cheynes theories. There is a war going on in america. Something has overtaken your country, but there are still forces who are against em.
Grock and how do you know it was his purpose? Why would he have to get the names right on a VIDEO INTERVIEW? Was he doing the video interview and then translating to a column in a rag? Does that make sense?
because the towers were empty at the time of the demolition and these people simulate a catastrophy, its a propaganda drill, its so obvious, i was in the swiss army and i did play the part of a victim in war game, same atmosphere of lazyness, people in real shock can't speak, and surely not with good grammar and technical terms
common man..i believe that it was an inside job but u go too far..we are not same..some people can take stress better than the others..somebody can watch blood somebody can kill someone else..so dont mystify the thing too much..then it looks stupid..
Why is this reporter asking for last names and telling them to spell it? Was he there getting them on camera so they could tell them what "really happened' later? Why would they need them to spell out their names? Was this "reporter" just collecting names? Very odd.
Note these witnesses are bloody and were actually on the scene. They saw NO PLANES! They were not in a "news" studio talking about "planes hit the buildings".These clips were not aired nation wide(local broadcast)only the big networks broadcast was seen.
The media is no damn good; they 100 percent (including NWO Alex "Abraham" Jones and loose change part 225 re-edit Dillion "Israel" Avery)vested in lying to all of us.
Where are these wiynesses whom saw planes; I have not seen any.
JASSM MISSILE FTW, and yes many of the videos have been proven to be fakes, I would trust science and physics over libel and hearsay any day. And this is coming from a person who 16 months ago wouldn't not even entertain the notion of no planes. The only road to the truth about 911 is an open mind.
People INSIDE the building did not see the planes. Why is this surprising and why is it proof that there were no planes?
If you had twenty people in a room. Had ten close their eyes and then you held up an object...ten people would tell you what object you held up, and ten people would say they didnt see the object. To a no planer that is evidence that there was no object. So stupid!
"People INSIDE the building did not see the planes. Why is this surprising and why is it proof that there were no planes?"
The Amazing Stanley saw a plane come right at him and is not deaf or burned all over.
/watch?v=T7Q1KxgeGZQ
If giant, commercial airliners hit the WTC, why are there multiple official dispatch reports saying it was a helicopter crash? Why did multiple people see a missile? And a small plane?
Using the Bureau of Transport Safety website, can you prove Flight 11 took off?
Apocalyps, can you show me the official dispatch reports that said it was a helicopter crash? Can you show me one instance of a witness saying that they saw a missle? Not that they think they saw a missle, that they saw a missle.
Here's air traffic control flight information on flight 11: gwu*edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc05*pdf
Make sure to get me that data on the 'helicopter crash' and witnesses who 'saw a missle'.
Right away, Sir! 0859 hours, 46 seconds OPERATOR: 8621, this is 1821 in Manhattan for the One World Trade... ...CRO: No problem. Did you hear it was a confirmed helicopter or a plane? OPERATOR: They said it's a helicopter. CRO: Helicopter; right? Yeah. OPERATOR: Yeah, yeah. They're not sure. But most people are saying helicopter... FIRE3.pdf [CALL BEGINS AT 08:48:20] DISPATCHER: Fire Department 408. OPERATOR: 408, this is 1981. I have a helicopter crash, One World Trade.
Apocalyps, citations are your friend. Don't just make things up. Provide citaitons of where you're claims came from so that I don't think you are just making them up.
I will not accept any 'evidence' from nico haupt. He's a little.....weird.
I *did* provide my source (Washington Post), but obviously you didn't do the quick search. Click on "complete transcripts", go to EMS Part 1, then pgs. 18 & 19.
"I will not accept any 'evidence' from nico haupt. He's a little.....weird."
So, is that why u didn't read my dispatch source? 'cuz
Nico has cited it? :)
Einstein was dissheveled & posed for a photo with his tongue sticking out. Freud was a coke addict. Newsflash:Groundbreaking Work is Often Done by Weirdos.
You need to get your eyes tested, my friend....you need to be able to spot the myriad manipulations, CGI insertions, layering screwups, forgeries and doctorings in the official news and amateur footage from 9/11. :)
In review:
"google: 'washington post 911 calls from september 11 2001', then click on the blue links within the article.
Click on 'complete transcripts', go to EMS Part 1, then pgs. 18 & 19."
Ok, Apocalyp, here in lies the problem..... There are videos of the planes hitting the towers. That's all the evidence I need to know that there were planes. Do get me to believe that there was something odd about the video clips you will need a video professional to show that there are anomolies. To date not one video expert has come forward to state that they have discrepencies with the videos.
"That's all the evidence I need" The perps rely on people like u. UA175's flightpath: perfectly straight & steep dive? watch?v=gOLdfbK7iec Looped screams @ 1:40 watch?v=XW18k8EoJb4 Fake nuke explosion on live TV defensetech*org/archives/004146*html watch?v=MzaN2x8qXcM CBS/NBC/AP video fakery bloglines*com/blog/ewing2001?id=4690
It's not surprising that different camera angles show different flight paths. I would be more suprised if each camera angle showed the same flight path. This is not evidence.
In your second video 'evidence' I have no idea what you mean by looped screams. It's just a woman saying 'my god' over and over again.
The fake nuke explosion was determined to be just that...fake. To date, no video expert has had an issue with the video coverage of the WTC crashes.
And again in your last 'evidence'. Experts can deem if something is manipulated in videos or not. I repeat, no video expert has come forward to claim anomolies with the video coverage of the WTC crashes.
google: "washington post 911 calls from september 11 2001", then click on the blue links within the article.
"No single transcript includes any witness w/in the building who stated that they actually saw w/ their own eyes, that a plane crashed into the building. No matter which transcript you read (almost 800 pages), it's only the operator which briefs the dispatcher or vice versa, but never a "caller"" ---Nico Haupt
Do you find it odd that all the call-in plane crash "eyewitnesses" except one, between plane crashes, worked for the news media?
/watch?v=AU9607IVOiY
There is a compilation of live, no-plane shots called....the name escapes me and I can't remember who made it. (It's done in gameshow style....can anyone help me out here?)
Of course they aren't going to witness the planes, they were inside the building. I mean if a pain suddenly hit a very tall virtical building and your on the 55th floor and the crash site on the 79th floor above you, all your going to hear is an explosion and maybe feel the building shake from the impact. Its all about perspective. they didn't even know what hit them until they got out of the buuilding.
Until they saw it on TV! Right? Please, make sense with a uniform trajectory of all the videos aired on 9/11 of the WTC2 attack by the mainstream TV deception.
merfwriter - (pt1) Mr RESCKA (as seen on this video) was on the 82nd FLOOR. He reports hearing 'like a sonic boom almost then a blast(...) the building shook (makes a swaying action with his hands...) saw papers flying out of the middle of the building' (does NOT report these as being on fire). What sounds almost like a sonic boom and is followed by a blast? A BOMB!
merfwriter - (pt2)A plane would have sounded like a loud crash followed by an explosion. By the way... The decompression wave that precedes a blast has very similar properties to those of a sonic boom. So get your physics straight.
That didn't look like a Plane that smacked right into the World Trade Centre more was hard to tell from looking underneath it could have been a Military Fighter Plane from Area 51 or something like that. That UFO probably was a top secret aircraft to divert us from the truth or possibably from out of space desguised as an earth manmade object. The circle on the microphone when he was interviewing that women in the car reminds me of that G in cicle compass symbol of the Freemasons.
That was no Plane that smacked right into the World Trade Centre looked like one from underneath could be a camouflage Military Fighter Plane from Area 51 or something like that. The UFO was probably a top secret aircraft from somewhere maybe from out of space. You see that circle on the Microphone when interviewing that women in the Car reminded me of the Freemason symbol like a compass that has the G in the middle of it.
The consfusion about the planes is intended. It's a part of the mind game the covert operation has with it. Learn about it from John Coleman and Tavistock. also check september clues - focus on the confusion and factof manipulated vids.
The military talked about using TV fakery since 1995.
Digitally altering live TV broadcasts has been feasible since 1998.
/watch?v=wpkqomUc7Xs
Strategic Communications Laboratories (SCLdotCC), a private military contractor which specializes in "psychological warfare" (their own words), says their "OpCentre" can:
"be designed to override all national radio and TV broadcasts, allowing the government and military to communicate with the public as the need arises."
Bob & Bri's video conveniently has an edit at the time of hit, so u don't see a plane. The Naudet shot of the second hit has MANY frames edited out of the 2nd plane hit. Why?
3 different channels showing 3 different realities.
/watch?v=aAMm3PBBCCs "The Allegory of the Cave" (describes) people basing their perception of reality on mere shadows of the true reality. You may also want to view..."Matrix"...and "Wag the Dog"." ---from military "perception warfare" paper
When some footage shows NO PLANES, and other footage shows 'plane', then the ONLY CONCLUSION on this issue, that one can come to is that ANY PLANE shown is DUBBED IN!
Well, that's what one can fairly safely assume after studying the evidence that the videos were not live when it said "live" and that the planes in the video are CGI.
Planes were flown by.
/watch?v=iNzIcy08Nyc
"Incidents to establish a credible attack...Start rumors (many)....Start fires....Conduct funerals for mock-victims....parts of aircraft (could be) found." -----Northwoods document, 1962
Please watch all parts of "September Clues" (including 'epilogue').
There were victims indeed, remember Edna Cintron. There were no real planes smashing onto solid materials on 9/11. Any true witness of victims counts. I need you to reason and to write three paramount characteristics of the cointels to fight against them to let justice reach the real criminals Cheney, Rumsfeld, Bush and their bosses the military industrial complex. Not in vain Ike denounced them. They finally did their deed on 9/11.
9/11 = Inside Job - Al Quaida = Cia - 9/11 = No Plane 9/11 = biggest lie ever ! 9/11 = Controlled demolition 9/11 1990 exaktly 11 years bevor ... google " 9/11 1990 nwo "
ganzegal77 4 months ago
Already Hitler knew: "The people will more willingly believe the big lie than the small lie."
vinzhell 6 months ago
Four witnesses out of how many? Where were they when it happened? If they didn't see the planes, then it would be logical for them to think that the explosion was caused by a bomb. There are thousands of other witnesses that say it was a plane.
alkon455 6 months ago
The "no planes theory" is absolutely one of the stupidest 9/11 conspiracy theories. Right up there with "the Jews did it" theory. How hard is it to accept the obvious cause of these events? Al Qaeda hijacked four planes and crashed them into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and the field in Pennsylvania. Any other explanations are just ridiculous.
TimothyRaymond1 7 months ago
@TimothyRaymond1 Yeah.. and the hijackers were not on the passengerlists and magically later they were. They managed to hijack 4 planes with boxcutters, tear gass and plastic knives, and none of the pilots were able to send the 4 digit emergency code that a hijacking was going on? They used tear gass inside a small space. Well, then they probably would have gassmasks on them, don't you think? They managed to get all this shit through the US customs... Good luck with your fairytale!
Fakers911 7 months ago 2
@TimothyRaymond1
its you who are ridiculous chump
thisisyourwakeup 7 months ago
FUCK THE PHARAOHS
DaCube83 10 months ago
WHY ? Is The Reporter Asking everyone to Spell their Last name ??? He sounds like a Government Plant ! No normal reporter would be interested in that detail. He's a fucken employee of the Scumbags who blew up the towers !
BrikSwoony 1 year ago 3
we should not only think about 9/11 we should talk about whats coming next !? what did the secret services planted next ... and why did they melt down the euro ? stop the war were in
stop the false media .. dont believe anything of that crap
the real human media .. with clearly information about what people need
and how we can respect eachother ... that is what the world needs !
and not any wapons or nuclear strikes ! thats insane
DaCube83 1 year ago 2
@DaCube83 AGREED 1000%
ClintsFitness 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why did they ask his name?
2020starman 1 year ago
why do they have to spell out there name?
so the goverment can go to their home's later on and tell that person to lie? or they just going to kill them in their sleep?
monkeyjeroen 1 year ago
1:22 "we went to the stair case, to try to get down, we were going down, we got stuck on the floor because the door to the stair case woudn't open"
People question the story of William Rodriguez who was a janitor for WTC 1 and saved 15 people. He had one of the keys for the stair case exits because only 1 fire exit would open out of 4. This was to maintain the flow of people out of the building.
Tzimnewman3 1 year ago
im not even american but i get pissed off at the people who still think it was a terrorist attack, you dumb fucks need to open your ears and listen to what the actual experts have to say not what the tv tells you, brainwashed idoits!
westryder121 1 year ago 5
@westryder121 you are totally right
johnshredder1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@johnshredder1
make sure you watch
THEORY OF GHOSTPLANE
LegPains 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@westryder121
remember we Americans are the same nation that voted for that fraudulent phony elitist stooge Osama Obama as our president , the most inexperienced unqualified president in American history
so what else would you expect ?, watch
911 PASSENGERS FICTITIOUS
LegPains 1 year ago
@westryder121 i agreeee!!!!!
shamizene 1 year ago
did anyone die?
abercrombieToronto 1 year ago
@abercrombieToronto Almost 3,000 people died dude.
prozie286 1 year ago
Has anyone noticed that there is only one man w soot around his nose & mouth, who seems shaken? in '93 (btw, 93 is masonic number) I was made aware that people exiting the fiery blg had soot under his/her nose & mouth. 2 witnesses seem too calmn, 1 gets in an SUV (delivery person?), 1 is sweaty, looks like Central Park.
074August 1 year ago
Ok hear me out. Who's not to say that perhaps you guys are the ones who have been lied to by people who want to make this country look evil?
SpecAgentRPMcMurphy 1 year ago
@SpecAgentRPMcMurphy i agree with you 100%...everyone always calls us "sheep" for "believing everything we're told," well the conspiracy theorists were "told" its a conspiracy as well...they're believing everything they're told too
poonkinator 1 year ago
@poonkinator Sorry pook....I believed what the government told me at first...then I studied and researched things for myself and came to the realization the "official" story does not add up. Do I want to believe our leaders lied to cover things up? No I dont WANT to believe it...but there are too many instances in the past that MAKE me believe something was covered up. Too many unanswered questions...too amny things not addressed...too many things left out of the explanation.
unafraidtruther 1 year ago
@unafraidtruther all you did was do research on OTHER peoples work. Did you go to NYC make measurements, plug them into physical equations, interview eyewitnesses and politicians? If you did that by yourself then no youre not believing what people told you. Im not saying it wasnt some sort of conspiracy because yes there are things that don't add up, but some of things people are proposing are the most retarded things Ive ever heard IN MY LIFE. And I'm a volunteer for the special olympics lol
poonkinator 1 year ago
@poonkinator I totally agree some things are preposterous and no I did not do any scientific research nor interview any politicians. I'm going on the non-included testimonies, the obvious video inconsistencies and facts that are left out or plainly ignored. The 9/11 commission admitted to having their hands tied and the media has undoubtedly shown what they seem to have been told to show. As I said too many unanswered questions.
unafraidtruther 1 year ago
Siiiiiiiiiigh 8 years and counting... almost 9 now an the 9/11 bowel movement has yet to provide a SINGLE DEINITIVE ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION for the events of 9/11 despite the mountains of SHIT they call evidence of an inside job
SWEP2AOTC2002 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SWEP2AOTC2002
You guys, I've had a thought, and if your ever losing hope in society because our news stations still refuse to expose September 11th, then read on.
All the angry people you see fighting so desperately to deny it being the government one day HAVE to realize it was a demolition job because it's obvious. When all these people have realized they've been double-crossed, I'm happy that their anger will be on our side. Peace.
emusheen 1 year ago
And at the pentagon, the only witnesses to a plane were all producers from USATODAY who were all conveniently late to work, and who were all conveniently within 1/4 mile from each other. And the video tape that had been confiscated by FBI and was returned by Freedom of information act SHOWED ZERO PLANES, but was aimed at where they claim the plane wen.
beastshawnee 2 years ago
Ok. I can buy the Pentagon attack was very weird. All the information about it that is out there to provide answers has just raised more questions.
But come on. Do you really believe in some massive worldwide conspiracy that controls the media? You (and all the other "truthers") would have been excellent script writers for the X-Files.
Not even Fox Mulder or the Lone Gunman were that paranoid.
SpecAgentRPMcMurphy 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Witnesses who did not see a plane - 4
Witnesses who saw a plane - 1,000,000+
Need I say more...
SpecAgentRPMcMurphy 2 years ago
You need to say...That you are a shill. A person paid to spread the official lie. You know people who actually saw the "plane" crash at the exact moment of impact are all connected to the Media. Everyone else just saw planes fly by. There were definitely planes in the sky-that's no lie, but zero planes impacted the twin towers. And yet 3 ,yes 3 giant skyscrapers fell down at the World Trade Center. INVESTIGATE. ACT.
beastshawnee 2 years ago
So I am being paid to spread lies? Damn. Guess my secret is out now.
Seriously though do you honestly believe that everyone who was in New York and saw it happen are lying? Thats crazy. Thousands witnessed it right in front of their eyes and millions were watching it on TV.
I am no fan of the government especially politicians but they are not the enemy.
al-Qaeda is and don't try and tell me that radical islam is made up too because they do exist and they hate this country.
SpecAgentRPMcMurphy 2 years ago
@SpecAgentRPMcMurphy
uh.. excuse me.. but it is not hard to see at all.. two buildings crumbling to dust... in a demolition like fashion. Peace.
emusheen 1 year ago
u mean TV-WITNESS...
every TV-WITNESS SAW PLANES
REAL witness, which where on 9/11 at the place, NOONE SAW a plane... "i saw a little something".... this doesnt sound like an commercial plane...
sir4ki 1 year ago
So according to you, all the people
who were at the base of the WTC didn't see a plane
Not one of them? And the ones who were there and saw it
are all on some secret government payroll
to spread lies? Ah. I get it now. That makes sense.
SpecAgentRPMcMurphy 1 year ago
@sir4ki the government would not be able to pay MILLIONS of people enough to keep their mouths shut...millions of New yorkers said they legitimately saw planes hit the towers (and don't start with this new holographic plane bullshit) the others (the ones in which YOU are saying said "I saw a little something") probably didnt actually see the event take place, they probably heard the explosion, looked up and saw the towers on fire. Simple as that
poonkinator 1 year ago
@SpecAgentRPMcMurphy
absolutely right
lolhahalol2 1 year ago
I have known for years that 9/11 was a controlled demolition job.
Joefreiheit 2 years ago
The witnesses at 2:29 says "there was a big impact" that would be the plane, then says "we were below the explosion", that would be the fuel in the plane exploding on "impact". When he talks about the "last one" he is speaking of the last terriorist attack.
Not difficult to understand people.
These people were interviewed within moments and were inside the building not seeing the plane. You could very well assume a bomb thinking back to the first bombing in early 90s.
glennwa11 2 years ago
Why do Americans believe this was caused by planes? You will be hard pressed to find anyone outside the US who believes that this was the cause.
Most International media outlets were there for the second explosion and none of us saw a plane. Here in Australia people quickly concluded from the evidence that it was an inside job and time has only confirmed the suspicion.
Its an unfortunate truth that if you want to know what is going on in America you have to step outside of it.
daveymaxine 2 years ago 2
@daveymaxine
"Why do Americans believe this was caused by planes"
Let me expalin something to you. The entire world saw the 2nd plane hit the 2nd tower live on television. Is that not enough proof for you?
minwild30 1 year ago
@minwild30
No. As i just said, that is not what we saw (live) at all. We certainly saw nothing else but that later in the day and forever since - but, no, my friend, i watched the live coverage and not even those on the scene reported seeing a plane until much later - including NBC's own anchors.
daveymaxine 1 year ago
@minwild30 live television?or fake television?
elbigboss1234 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@elbigboss1234
for more on that watch
911 TABOO
LegPains 1 year ago
@minwild30 Actually NOOO! even iff planes hit ''and i bealeive that to''There are so many other things wrong with this..
TheoriginalGrumphy 1 year ago
i was 6 years old and my dad was walking to school with me and flight 11 flew right over us. it was unusually low. so i watched it and we saw it fly right into the tower and explode. we were already late so we went to battery park and watched from there. a few minutes later the other plane hit. thats when we realized it was terrorists. we ran back to our apartment and watched the rest from my bedroom window. there was so much dust from the collapse we were trapped inside until later that night.
wiitarded522 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
yes, FOUR people say they didnt see any planes but four MILLION other people (such as myself) can tell you different!!! shithead. god im so sick of people find the most trivial details they can and basing their entire opinion on them and proceed to try to make everyone else agree with them.
wiitarded522 2 years ago
You were there? Tell us more....
XxRoycexX 2 years ago
Comment removed
XxRoycexX 2 years ago
omg! i never seen this movie before
Blauwecannel 2 years ago
you should add NPT to your tags LOL
and check out my video, and what i have to say about npt there too!
ofcourse there were no planes! how foolish some people are:P silly!
metalfist616 2 years ago
Why do all people who say 911 fake inside job always shout abuse on here to others that have the opion it wasnt? as u can tell none of the pople in this video was in view of the outside and there fore didnt see the planes ! i cant see me arse hole but i have one! back ur therories up instead of slaggin peopke who dont agree with them no evidence of fake planes
energy3300 2 years ago
please check out my FROM AN IDIOT videos, before you say no evidence!
metalfist616 2 years ago
And what evidence you have ? did they give the whole of new york lsd or somthing ? cgi a hlogram of planes commin in so the whole of new york can see bit far fetched to say the least and another thing i will even take into the consideraion of inside job ie they new it was comming ect but please face facts planes tookj those buildings down not cgi i have yet to hear 1 credible explosive expert say it was thermite as i know fam members who take buildings down ur vids give no vaild evidence
energy3300 2 years ago
What an asshole reporter for channel 7 eyewitness news. Fucking people are hurt and bleeding and all they can do is stick a mike in their face. SCUMBAGS!
imnazhole 2 years ago 2
i think it was poorly done on purpose
joiganja 2 years ago 2
Anyone who thinks CNN and all other stations can edit live footage (including private camcorders) on the day with CGI planes is something of a lunatic..
MrOllyK 2 years ago
They had more than a day to prepare. Everything was set and ready to go. All they need was the event.
And it wasn't CNN.
BlueTunisia 2 years ago
And you got this "absolute proof" from whom.. a friend of yours or some official document stamped and approved by all concerned? This video chose 4 witnesses who didn't see planes. Many didn't, but most did. This story is biased without presenting both sides of the story. There's also some bull story about weapons from space that did it. So the stations somehow managed to edit the footage on private camcorders too now? C'mon..
MrOllyK 2 years ago
If you were in the building you are not going see anything you moron. I was fucking three blocks away and saw the planes going into the buildings. If you can project visions into my eyes or CGI my eyesight then you are a better man than me. Typical fucking moron who thinks man did not land on the moon. Probablt live in BF no where. If you weren't there the shut the f up about cause you don't know !!!
humphrn 2 years ago
Yes thousands of people saw NO PLANE
The media won't report on that .
even the first strike video is faked .
Fake shadows = faked video .
SAYYOURROSARY 2 years ago
Exactly.
There is no mystery here. Cruise missiles were used and no example is more clear than in the Pentagon strike
acorntechnique 2 years ago 3
ppls will believe everything tv say! if the Tv told them 1000 elephant hit the WTc they will believe it! Anyone with half a brain know that no plane hit the WTC it's graphic illusion!
sodasoap 2 years ago
why r ppl saying the bulidings swayed? i know because of impact
jaccskog 2 years ago
These people are talking about the sounds of the collapse, they dont say anything about "no planes"! Why would the govt try to fake planes crashing in the most densely populated city in the US? Did they think "Nobody will notice"??? There were thousands and thousands of people looking DIRECTLY at the WTC when the 2nd plane crashed, how the hell can you honestly say that there were no planes? NO LOGIC!
klmullins65 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No-planers are discrediting the entire 9/11 truth movement. There were definitely planes crashing into the Twin Towers, though they weren't conventional airliners.
Gabeedmann 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
can't believe how stupid people get.
just about every TV in the world aired the second crash live! and there were witnesses that saw the planes I've got relatives that saw the second plane. they said it's not a U.S. airliner tho.
ivantheterrible94 2 years ago
you fucking scum bag the planes were fucking CGI they were fake view my uploads
tonydayna 2 years ago 24
@tonydayna They made CGI planes on live television?
alkon455 6 months ago
RETARD!~!!!!!!!~~~~!!!!!!!!!!!!
ClassyChic25 2 years ago
Nobody has asked about the first video of the first plane. Go back and watch the video. Why is there a freaken cameraman there filming firemen staring at a stupid manhole! This seems suspicious in itself. Look at this! The cameraman just happens to be there whilst the first plane flies into the tower and he also is able to look up in the sky zoom the camera over to the tower and in the right direction to film the plane going in. Isn't city plumbing the NY works dept's job and not firemen's jobs?
Praestantia111 3 years ago 2
why do they ask for people's names and why do they ask them to spell them?
DiogoE6 3 years ago
Maybe for evidence,
Or even just to check wether they are in a good medical condition or not, when I crashed my bike the police asked me all those questions, just like: What date is it?, I'm not sure though
ShenkyNL 3 years ago
why do you think the people that say they heard the plane coming are actors?? What makes you think they aren't the ones telling the truth? THere is footage. I guess the world is flat too despite proof.
Martano666 3 years ago
How do we know who is telling the truth unless we were actually there. I'm sure most of the actual victims were in too much shock to be of any valuable intelligence. There is way too much propaganda spread on both sides, but the simple fact is: the 9/11 commission report lacks intracacy and leaves many unanswered questions. Like the Warren Commision, this report in itself brings suspiscion upon the government and it's closest allies..
HighHeadJim 2 years ago
everyone keep saying 'there was a big impact'. but none says there was a sound of a airplane coming, or there was huge engine roaring before the explosion, but there was not! never less,only the paid actor aka witnesses said there was, there was, planes hitting the building. piece of sheet, check other videos where there is this one guy witnesses the plane hits wtc. but what's funny, he said he heard the airplane coming towards them because of the loud sound of the engines attract him ;-p actor'
dewatandas 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
of course there were planes, if there werent, then what happened to the planes that took off that day. did they just disapear? they found debris from the plane in the wreck afterward. this is so stupid
tmon999 3 years ago
Check out the very EXISTENCE of the planes and LAX airport where relatives of the passengers families were to go to see what happened to their family members...also check out the video September Clues. I was on the fence til I saw that video. It will open your eyes to media involvement in a major way.
onesliceshort 3 years ago 2
They easily can plant broken parts of planes, I feel bad for whoever still believes this had anything to do with planes and any government but our own.
ElderBerryy 3 years ago
this is the very reason why it's very easy to DUPE people like you.. you watch too much TV and became oblivious to the OVERWHELMING proof that 9/11 was Government Job supported by the Elites.
BedShaker0909 3 years ago 2
Thanks for your nice clean summary.
Fact:
Most people stare mindlessly into their TVs day and night, absorbed and mesmerised by whatever nonsense the networks choose to bash us with.
ABC, FOX, CNN are the media arms of the elite and hence they will show only the elite's slant on a situation.
Those people who believe this was an act of terrorism brewed up Osama Bin-Laden are simply hypnotised by their government's lies.
Not only was 911 an inside job, it was actually poorly executed.
acorntechnique 2 years ago
Thanks for the reply.. Well, actually, the Elites know very well that it ain't gonna be a perfect crime.. I always keep in mind that they are always 20 steps ahead of us.. And they hire the most brilliant minds in the world..
BedShaker0909 2 years ago
You're correct on every count of course.
There is an old saying:
"Fight fire with fire."
Now I'm no advocate of terrorism of course, whether it be the middle eastern variety or the more cruel and potent variety of the world's governments.
But I do believe in justice.
Accordingly I feel that the only way to deal with the elite is to 'take them out' - and I don't mean for dinner...
I'll leave that to your capable imagination to construe my meaning.
acorntechnique 2 years ago
exacty! i mean, why do they have to make it so obvious all the time? 911, the first wtc bombing (was admitted by cia) london, madrid, oklahoma city, pentagon, pensylvania, princess diana ... i mean really?! cant they do just one thing right without a trace?
metalfist616 2 years ago
And one last thing u only showing what people saying frst hand and when in shock u dont get me wrong i will belive once i see sommat that backs the theory up with solid evidence
energy3300 2 years ago
'Why do they have to make it so obvious all the time?
I think there are two reasons.
1. A conspiracy of this magnitude would be almost impossible to pull off without a trace.
2. I think they want us to know. It's like kicking a man when he's down. Millions know they did it, but by leaving so many clues, they're laughing in our faces.
acorntechnique 2 years ago 13
@acorntechnique my god that is actually the best comment ive ever read here on youtube about 9-11. that totally sumz up evrything in one go, well dun, thats exactly wat ive bin tryin 2 tell these foolz. keep in tuch my frend, u seem intelligent like me.
superfrickensexy 1 year ago
@acorntechnique Absolutely..They expect people to b to lame to do anything. And thats their excuse to..And actually now 9 years after it looks like they are right..Buisness as ussual..Almost makes me wanna jump their wagon...I dont,, but man &%¤#&/%¤#&¤#
TheoriginalGrumphy 1 year ago
@TheoriginalGrumphy
There is a huge truth movement going on - but like anything in this life, unless you get the support of the mass media, your movement has got almost no chance of making huge strides into the public domain.
The result?
9 years on and still most Americans truly believe that 911 was caused by 'foreign terrorists.'
911 was a staged event, conceived and enacted by the power elite in an effort to rally support from US citizens so that congress would agree to fund the Iraq war.
acorntechnique 1 year ago
@acorntechnique yup
izzysykopth 1 year ago
@acorntechnique ...well said
TheNeonAngel 1 year ago
@acorntechnique What is obvious to me.
1. Two planes hit the two towers.
2. I am laughing at your face.
alkon455 6 months ago
They control our governments, media, banking systems, energy systems, food, medical and pharmaceutical industries to name a few.
We are not in a position to fight any meaningful battles with these people.
The fact that millions know, is of little consequence when there is almost nothing we can do about it.
Fight fire with fire maybe?
Perhaps..
But how does one get close to these people?
The answer:
With great difficulty.
acorntechnique 2 years ago
amazing how absolutely no plane wreckage came out of the other side .... yet in allllll other known aviation accidents we find wreckage
girl4tonite 3 years ago
only reason i beleive this no plane story, is cuz in none of the live broadcast do you hear the reporter or anybody on the ground mention even seeing a plane.its only the ones in the newsroom who mention it,a plane that big and that loud had to get somebody's attention before impact but none of the videos show it.and you could digitally remove the plane from the film,but that means you can place a plane on the film also.
kingfaze19 3 years ago 2
No fucking idea what that last comment was supposed to mean. But go back to sleep you mindfucked individual.
DSM10471 3 years ago
Umm, the plane hit so quickly that if you werent in its line of sight, or if you were INSIDE the building, you didnt see it. Pretty simple. And yet ANOTHER 9/11 conspiracy that looks stupid.
DSM10471 3 years ago
and how many times the plane hit the building?
originalorol 3 years ago
explain why the media fucked about with the images that day (watch September Clues) After the first ´plane´ hit surely more people would have been looking up no? Thats pretty simple too. And the footage of the second plane crashing was blurred out under headline banners...the live scoop of the century....cmon man somethin stunk there. Im jst askin wtf was all that shit about.
onesliceshort 3 years ago
Wow.. 4 out of tens of thousands of people witnessing the event? I don't think that is much evidence of no planes
WhitieMcCracker 3 years ago
google: Quadri-Track ZCT
WTCnucleardemolition 3 years ago
on nycgov i tried to find victims:
list of those reported missing
(and here i was sent to cnn with these words)
The City of New York does not imply approval of the listed destinations, warrant the accuracy of any information set out in those destinations, or endorse any opinions expressed therein. Like NYCgov, all other web sites operate under the auspices and at the direction of their respective owners who should be contacted directly with questions regarding the content of these sites.
robertgrassi 3 years ago
The bit in the info bout the video that says check out the interview with guy who said it was a bomb, not worth anything, he said he saw everything etc but remember what just happened here! Watching live on TV, the first tower collapsed while bbc news was at the pentagon, angle of camera when it came back to NY obscured the collapse except for the dust and smoke and the reporter said about a bomb, seconds later footage quickly rewound live and then played forward to show what happened.confusion.
chrisswansea2 3 years ago
But if this is right, your whole system is fake. Not only the government, but the media too. Do you realize what that means?? Maybe the military wasn t involved, as high ranked generals denied cheynes theories. There is a war going on in america. Something has overtaken your country, but there are still forces who are against em.
benzingermany 3 years ago
My country. The UK? I don't think so. And anyway, your reply has nothing to do with what I said.
chrisswansea2 3 years ago
this wasn t a reply to you, it s about the eyewitnesses.
BTW: UK has other things "down the cellar" , Commonwealth of nations exist till today.
But imperalism is long over.
Whats with your industry?? There is no one, you are totally depending on other countries. Thats why everything is so extremly expensive.
And your finance sector took a big part in this new great depression.
But that are other battlefields.
benzingermany 3 years ago
Grock and how do you know it was his purpose? Why would he have to get the names right on a VIDEO INTERVIEW? Was he doing the video interview and then translating to a column in a rag? Does that make sense?
blite13 3 years ago
Of course that No plane!
Termininja 3 years ago
this is a very strange video
drkthms1 3 years ago
because the towers were empty at the time of the demolition and these people simulate a catastrophy, its a propaganda drill, its so obvious, i was in the swiss army and i did play the part of a victim in war game, same atmosphere of lazyness, people in real shock can't speak, and surely not with good grammar and technical terms
robertgrassi 3 years ago
common man..i believe that it was an inside job but u go too far..we are not same..some people can take stress better than the others..somebody can watch blood somebody can kill someone else..so dont mystify the thing too much..then it looks stupid..
originalorol 3 years ago
Why is this reporter asking for last names and telling them to spell it? Was he there getting them on camera so they could tell them what "really happened' later? Why would they need them to spell out their names? Was this "reporter" just collecting names? Very odd.
blite13 3 years ago
He was being a reporter. Wanted to get the names right if they used those clips for news footage.
GRock732 3 years ago
Notice that it was a local station interviewing people. Not CNN or Fox.
Good, interesting video. Needs more exposure!
LockNLoadRonPaul2008 3 years ago
Oh god. Now there's no planes. LOL.
VideosMarketing 3 years ago
there probably wasnt
Erithramere 3 years ago 3
Note these witnesses are bloody and were actually on the scene. They saw NO PLANES! They were not in a "news" studio talking about "planes hit the buildings".These clips were not aired nation wide(local broadcast)only the big networks broadcast was seen.
The media is no damn good; they 100 percent (including NWO Alex "Abraham" Jones and loose change part 225 re-edit Dillion "Israel" Avery)vested in lying to all of us.
Where are these wiynesses whom saw planes; I have not seen any.
foxxx2001 3 years ago
hillarious that you think Alex Jones and Loose Change guys are part of NWO and vested in lying to us. All have been humiliated on television.
Boxcutter7 3 years ago
JASSM MISSILE FTW, and yes many of the videos have been proven to be fakes, I would trust science and physics over libel and hearsay any day. And this is coming from a person who 16 months ago wouldn't not even entertain the notion of no planes. The only road to the truth about 911 is an open mind.
Shillbuster2000 3 years ago 3
Get the whole picture:
THE TRUTH ABOUT THE BALI BOMBING
THE TRUTH ABOUT 7/7
Both on youtube.
reddwarfski 3 years ago
People INSIDE the building did not see the planes. Why is this surprising and why is it proof that there were no planes?
If you had twenty people in a room. Had ten close their eyes and then you held up an object...ten people would tell you what object you held up, and ten people would say they didnt see the object. To a no planer that is evidence that there was no object. So stupid!
SnoopySuited 3 years ago
"People INSIDE the building did not see the planes. Why is this surprising and why is it proof that there were no planes?"
The Amazing Stanley saw a plane come right at him and is not deaf or burned all over.
/watch?v=T7Q1KxgeGZQ
If giant, commercial airliners hit the WTC, why are there multiple official dispatch reports saying it was a helicopter crash? Why did multiple people see a missile? And a small plane?
Using the Bureau of Transport Safety website, can you prove Flight 11 took off?
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
Apocalyps, can you show me the official dispatch reports that said it was a helicopter crash? Can you show me one instance of a witness saying that they saw a missle? Not that they think they saw a missle, that they saw a missle.
Here's air traffic control flight information on flight 11: gwu*edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc05*pdf
Make sure to get me that data on the 'helicopter crash' and witnesses who 'saw a missle'.
SnoopySuited 3 years ago
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
Apocalyps, citations are your friend. Don't just make things up. Provide citaitons of where you're claims came from so that I don't think you are just making them up.
I will not accept any 'evidence' from nico haupt. He's a little.....weird.
SnoopySuited 3 years ago
@snoopysuited
I *did* provide my source (Washington Post), but obviously you didn't do the quick search. Click on "complete transcripts", go to EMS Part 1, then pgs. 18 & 19.
"I will not accept any 'evidence' from nico haupt. He's a little.....weird."
So, is that why u didn't read my dispatch source? 'cuz
Nico has cited it? :)
Einstein was dissheveled & posed for a photo with his tongue sticking out. Freud was a coke addict. Newsflash:Groundbreaking Work is Often Done by Weirdos.
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
Apaco, I never saw any link to your helicopter report. Can you repost it?
SnoopySuited 3 years ago
You need to get your eyes tested, my friend....you need to be able to spot the myriad manipulations, CGI insertions, layering screwups, forgeries and doctorings in the official news and amateur footage from 9/11. :)
In review:
"google: 'washington post 911 calls from september 11 2001', then click on the blue links within the article.
Click on 'complete transcripts', go to EMS Part 1, then pgs. 18 & 19."
speaking of helicopters....
/watch?v=PZ3SQbK2Zfg
/watch?v=idoF3aVpmjg
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
Ok, Apocalyp, here in lies the problem..... There are videos of the planes hitting the towers. That's all the evidence I need to know that there were planes. Do get me to believe that there was something odd about the video clips you will need a video professional to show that there are anomolies. To date not one video expert has come forward to state that they have discrepencies with the videos.
SnoopySuited 3 years ago
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
Apcoalyp,
September Clues debunked (by a conspiracy theorist no less):
watch?v=B6jS2Ah22us
A real video expert debunking some of the noplane theories:
watch?v=rXj60eGSPMQ
watch?v=akwFhxl8BVs
SnoopySuited 3 years ago
Apocalypsynch,
Concerning your 'evidence':
It's not surprising that different camera angles show different flight paths. I would be more suprised if each camera angle showed the same flight path. This is not evidence.
In your second video 'evidence' I have no idea what you mean by looped screams. It's just a woman saying 'my god' over and over again.
cont.
SnoopySuited 3 years ago
cont.
The fake nuke explosion was determined to be just that...fake. To date, no video expert has had an issue with the video coverage of the WTC crashes.
And again in your last 'evidence'. Experts can deem if something is manipulated in videos or not. I repeat, no video expert has come forward to claim anomolies with the video coverage of the WTC crashes.
SnoopySuited 3 years ago
"To date not one video expert has come forward to state that they have discrepencies with the videos."
Not true! Sept. Clues was made by a video expert!!!
See pts. 1-9 + epilogue
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
official dispatch reports (cont'd)
google: "washington post 911 calls from september 11 2001", then click on the blue links within the article.
"No single transcript includes any witness w/in the building who stated that they actually saw w/ their own eyes, that a plane crashed into the building. No matter which transcript you read (almost 800 pages), it's only the operator which briefs the dispatcher or vice versa, but never a "caller"" ---Nico Haupt
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
"The consfusion about the planes is intended."
I agree that much of the confusion about the planes was scripted and much of it was real.
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
Butthead Saw a Rocket (or somethin')
[haven't confirmed it yet, but his voice seems to be pitched down a bit]
/watch?v=mo1eQha4HPY
fake as the others
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Apocaly,
The cameraman was zoomed out. He doesn't know what he saw.
9/11 was not faked. Get over it.
SnoopySuited 3 years ago
Does Ludlum count as a "member of the public"?
/watch?v=bB1AqudE0Dw
Do you find it odd that all the call-in plane crash "eyewitnesses" except one, between plane crashes, worked for the news media?
/watch?v=AU9607IVOiY
There is a compilation of live, no-plane shots called....the name escapes me and I can't remember who made it. (It's done in gameshow style....can anyone help me out here?)
Have you seen all ten parts of "September Clues"?
Also,
/watch?v=p0U-m3zZXmc
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
"Do you find it odd that all the call-in plane crash "eyewitnesses" except one, between plane crashes, worked for the news media?" -
YEAH why would the NEWS MEDIA be paying attention to things like that?
Alfrunk 3 years ago
On 9/11 did the police confiscate EVERY camera,video recorder and mobile phone from the thousands of people in the streets??
No.
So,
In the 8 YEARS since 9/11 where is ONE SINGLE video from a member of the public that shows explosions at the twin towers with NO PLANES???
There isn't 1 single video or picture, in 8 years.
the no-planes theory was always bullshit. Time has simply proved it.
sovereign777 3 years ago
You fucking shill cocksucker!!!David Handschuh's photograph shows no plane.EVERY video showing planes has been shown to be fake.
machfron 3 years ago
"EVERY video showing planes has been shown to be fake."..
No it hasn't, AT ALL. You stupid little girl.
Grow up and stop pretending you know things you don't.
You are not clever enough.
sovereign777 3 years ago
Heh heh... i've got some coyote-roadrunner cartoons and video game caps that you would probably believe really happened too. :-)
RunkerTunker 3 years ago
so where did all the people that were on those planes go how bout u explain that one
x3theusedxx 3 years ago
Bastard cocksucker !!!!!
machfron 3 years ago
"On 9/11 did the police confiscate EVERY camera,video recorder and mobile phone from the thousands of people in the streets??"
That's not what's being implied here. But there is this:
/watch?v=5BvmdWAIs14
And can u direct us to a single mobile phone picture of a 9/11 plane? Or surveillance camera footage near the WTC?
Why are there only 40 or so (as far as I recall) amateur shots and only 5 live shots?
Here's just 1 video (news not amateur)showing the expl. w/o the plane:
/watch?v=zQTsiLX3XbA
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
gay
spearguardian 3 years ago
Not a human contrived event!!
sawzaw203 3 years ago
Of course they aren't going to witness the planes, they were inside the building. I mean if a pain suddenly hit a very tall virtical building and your on the 55th floor and the crash site on the 79th floor above you, all your going to hear is an explosion and maybe feel the building shake from the impact. Its all about perspective. they didn't even know what hit them until they got out of the buuilding.
merfwriter 3 years ago
Until they saw it on TV! Right? Please, make sense with a uniform trajectory of all the videos aired on 9/11 of the WTC2 attack by the mainstream TV deception.
911stealth2 3 years ago
merfwriter - TRUTH goes through 3 stages... ridicule, violent opposition and eventually wideheld acceptance.
'This loon says the Eartrh is round... ha ha! What an idiot!'
'This fucking retard says the Earth is round, he's talking shit trying to confuse things!'
and finally, 'Of course the Earth is round, just like the moon, I always knew that...'
rarosera 3 years ago
merfwriter - (pt1) Mr RESCKA (as seen on this video) was on the 82nd FLOOR. He reports hearing 'like a sonic boom almost then a blast(...) the building shook (makes a swaying action with his hands...) saw papers flying out of the middle of the building' (does NOT report these as being on fire). What sounds almost like a sonic boom and is followed by a blast? A BOMB!
rarosera 3 years ago
merfwriter - (pt2)A plane would have sounded like a loud crash followed by an explosion. By the way... The decompression wave that precedes a blast has very similar properties to those of a sonic boom. So get your physics straight.
rarosera 3 years ago
CTARDS
sovereign777 3 years ago
so you are saying that no planes crashed into any buildings that day?
serfur007 3 years ago
That didn't look like a Plane that smacked right into the World Trade Centre more was hard to tell from looking underneath it could have been a Military Fighter Plane from Area 51 or something like that. That UFO probably was a top secret aircraft to divert us from the truth or possibably from out of space desguised as an earth manmade object. The circle on the microphone when he was interviewing that women in the car reminds me of that G in cicle compass symbol of the Freemasons.
TheMutantSlayer 4 years ago
TheMutantSlayer
Joined: January 06, 2008
Last Login: 8 hours ago
Videos Watched: 52
Subscribers: 0
Channel Views: 30
Age: 30
Country: United Kingdom
So, you like pizzas? Why are you over here expounding on 911? Did you watch 'In Plane Sight?'
Do me and everyone else fighting for justice a favor; do some research before spreading the gov strawman arguments.
aJoeCraine01a 4 years ago
That was no Plane that smacked right into the World Trade Centre looked like one from underneath could be a camouflage Military Fighter Plane from Area 51 or something like that. The UFO was probably a top secret aircraft from somewhere maybe from out of space. You see that circle on the Microphone when interviewing that women in the Car reminded me of the Freemason symbol like a compass that has the G in the middle of it.
TheMutantSlayer 4 years ago
The consfusion about the planes is intended. It's a part of the mind game the covert operation has with it. Learn about it from John Coleman and Tavistock. also check september clues - focus on the confusion and factof manipulated vids.
phoebus1966 4 years ago
MORE COINTEL. NO PLANERS ARE SHILLS!
ryanzit 4 years ago
Okay? And plane-huggers are idiots. We could play insult games all day. Get lost.
ImyManz99 4 years ago
ryanzit
Joined: January 29, 2008
Last Login: 1 hour ago
Videos Watched: 7
Subscribers: 0
Channel Views: 2
Age: 27
Country: New Zealand
A little out of your depth, aren't you? A shill is someone who prestends to be part of the audience when they are actually part of the show.
I know you know what I mean!
aJoeCraine01a 4 years ago
The military talked about using TV fakery since 1995.
Digitally altering live TV broadcasts has been feasible since 1998.
/watch?v=wpkqomUc7Xs
Strategic Communications Laboratories (SCLdotCC), a private military contractor which specializes in "psychological warfare" (their own words), says their "OpCentre" can:
"be designed to override all national radio and TV broadcasts, allowing the government and military to communicate with the public as the need arises."
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
@sovereign777
Bob & Bri's video conveniently has an edit at the time of hit, so u don't see a plane. The Naudet shot of the second hit has MANY frames edited out of the 2nd plane hit. Why?
3 different channels showing 3 different realities.
/watch?v=aAMm3PBBCCs "The Allegory of the Cave" (describes) people basing their perception of reality on mere shadows of the true reality. You may also want to view..."Matrix"...and "Wag the Dog"." ---from military "perception warfare" paper
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
When some footage shows NO PLANES, and other footage shows 'plane', then the ONLY CONCLUSION on this issue, that one can come to is that ANY PLANE shown is DUBBED IN!
Simple.
apostledbm 4 years ago
Amen, brutha.
3 different channels showing 3 different realities.
/watch?v=aAMm3PBBCCs
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
Well, that's what one can fairly safely assume after studying the evidence that the videos were not live when it said "live" and that the planes in the video are CGI.
Planes were flown by.
/watch?v=iNzIcy08Nyc
"Incidents to establish a credible attack...Start rumors (many)....Start fires....Conduct funerals for mock-victims....parts of aircraft (could be) found." -----Northwoods document, 1962
Please watch all parts of "September Clues" (including 'epilogue').
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
Don't trust anything the media tells you. Unless you personally know these witnesses, assume they are plants.
Sorry to be so paranoid & twitchy, but, we are up against a many headed monster for whom all truth is risk.
The only reality of 911 was TV fakery. Everything else we saw on TV was false.
Everything.
aJoeCraine01a 4 years ago
There were victims indeed, remember Edna Cintron. There were no real planes smashing onto solid materials on 9/11. Any true witness of victims counts. I need you to reason and to write three paramount characteristics of the cointels to fight against them to let justice reach the real criminals Cheney, Rumsfeld, Bush and their bosses the military industrial complex. Not in vain Ike denounced them. They finally did their deed on 9/11.
911stealth2 4 years ago