Added: 4 years ago
From: TheScrutinizerReport
Views: 30,772
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (149)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the distance from earth to tether is 100  miles and sits above africa in this video.i don't know the diameter of the tether,so this is the missing link,but you must remember it's only a high strengh cable so i can't see it being that thick.i would like someone out there to try and find out the diameter of the tether.and also the person states on the video only one object changes course'if you watch the proper tether incident video plenty of them change course.

  • NO WAY...

    2) Looking at this film... if that tether is 12 miles long, then how THICK does it appear to be... 1/4 mile... 1/2 ... ONE mile wide?

    The further away ANY object is, the smaller it should appear to be... but not with this magic tether.

  • NO WAY... too many things wrong here folks.

    1) whats the diameter of the tether? 2 inches, 4 inches, 6 inches? Well, we all know its 12 miles long. To see the entire 12 mile LENGTH of it, how far away would it have to be, to be captured on a single Camera frame? 10, 20...30 miles away? You couldn't even see a shaft of a common street light (12 inches) in diameter from 4 blocks away... how is one to see a tether from 20 miles away?

  • And another dramatic video just released a couple of days ago - is far more significant "Nasa Feeds Shows UFO Armada Above Earth" Russian space news site indicates they are heading towards Earth and should be here by 2012.

  • aliens probably are interested in us as we are in them

  • interesting,.. in the footage of 'sts 48` somewhere an u.f.o. changes direction at tremendous speed..

  • what`s carbage ?

  • There is many carbage in space and satellites.

  • It took me awhile to think who it was but the voice sounds like the guy from the Leroy Jenkins video (the first one to speak).

  • This is my OPINION on UFO's and Aliens....I beleive that these "aliens" are really humans from the future, coming back in time to do something...make minor changes in history or study early humans..thats why they don't really mess with us. The more we use our brains the bigger our heads get. The less we use our muscles the smaller our bodies get. If I'm wrong and its not us, then the dominant form of intelligent beings in the universe is of a humanoid one.

  • @lizardof78 This is not south park...lol

  • how do you explain these ufo discs that pulsate with some kind of electrical force, and there are discs discovered that are ancient artifacts that look pretty much identical to these. What did they see thousands of years ago??

  • I watched it and saw nothing strange, it just seemed to follow a curved path.

  • There is no explanation. Most all of them in the shot change in a strange way. I think the fact that the people were so calm over transmission meant that they were seeing something unbelievable. If there was that many floating objects in space, it wouldn't be safe to send humans into space. So they just shut down and let the tether drift away, trying to remain calm as all those objects floated around it.

  • flyer cigarrette

  • This is clearly just a piece of space junk. Every mission into space has left debris behind. NASA tracks all the pieces they can to try to avoid collisions with the shuttles and the space station.

    youtube.com/watch?v=43ac9gmR3f­A

    youtube.com/watch?v=6iOkAlkZT4­w

    youtube.com/watch?v=5tQYxe4uv3­A

  • @ChrisArcen a piece of space junk? space junk DONT just apear and change direction like that. some of the objects stop for a few seconds then move on again which means its got intelligence. i will willingly show you the video that shows the object comming into view stopping for a few seconds then moving on in the same direction it came from. this video doesn't cover the full footage and its poor quality.

  • @019208237 They just appear because they are following the curvature of the earth and can only be seen when they are in a spot where sunlight can reflect off of them. The shuttle changes direction some times which make them appear to change direction. If they are moving at the same speed as the shuttle it will look like it stopped. The shuttle flies and 17,000 mph so if the object was stopped it would be just a blur going by camera, so none of your theories work.

  • @ChrisArcen Well if its the change in direction of the shuttle thats causing the change in direction of one of the objects then they would all be changing direction at the same time and not just one, think about it. . the objects that just apear out of no where allready have objects in focus right next to them so i very much doubt they just apear due to the reflection of the sun, so none of your theories work.

  • @ChrisArcen also the tether is not changing direction but some of the objects are so its not the shuttle thats causing them to change direction otherwise you would see the tether change direction when the objects do.

  • @ChrisArcen copy and paste this into the youtube video search...

    TSS-1R "Tether Incident" - Shake-Reduction stabilization w/ UFO flightpath tracking (Long version

  • @ChrisArcen by the way those links you have given dont work.

  • they are all ufos'

  • Shut down this video ASAP. This is your last warning Chris. Don't you love your dog? Wouldn't want her to go missing would ya?

  • @infowazz Shut up prick..

  • That one in particular i dont think was a ufo, other objects moved as well at the time of that, the sts footage is much more covincing, the 5 or 6 objects that fly in and the big one that flies in the middle and the light up. Now lets hear people say thats gamma bursts or something lol

  • they might be just watching us, same as we watch animalshows, entertainment, who can realy know,

    btw the tether looks the same as the phobos ufo, it might have been the same....

  • Some of these comments, are people trying to push the fear button. Why should we fear ET's, they are obviosly far more advanced than us, they can traverse galaxys. If they were hostile they would have done us in a long time ago.

    Think about it, why would they wait for our technology to advance any further If they were hostile?

    The fact that they don't violently retaliate when our military chase and fire upon them, speaks volumes!

    It will be a Sorry day if we ever realy threaten them.

  • @strawberryelohist If aliens would land on our earth i would shoot them and creat disaster

  • @mistervova11 They expect that from stupid primitive people, yet they still risk their lives to try and save us from ourselves from people like you.

  • @strawberryelohist lol and how do you know?

  • @mistervova11 It's pretty much common sense once you understand the big picture, but don't get me wrong although they are trying to guide us to the right path if we should decide to do the stupid thing like blow the life of the face of this planet in a nuclear war they won't stop us,, the only reason they have restrained us from doing it to ourselves already is to buy time for the last of the 144,000 to be sealed. Hopefully world leaders have had time to see that they won't survive such a war.

  • @strawberryelohist Obvisously? Dude why cant some of them be dumber? Its thoughts like that that annoy me.

  • @iEatChromite

    Some Humanities out there in the infinite of space are less advanced, but when a humanity comes to the cross roads in their history like we have now, they either overcome their aggressiveness and advance to the intergalactic stage or they destroy themselves with the energy sources that would have enabled them to do so,, It's that simple.

  • @strawberryelohist Thats like saying it'l be a sorry day when a 4 year old girl threatens Chuck Norris..

  • @willieturnip Yes, but lets remember that the 4yo (us) already have the capacity to destroy this planet and the life on it.. Our galactic friends out there are watching and if any destructive technology is directed at them they will rendered it harmless, remember Sodom and Gomorrah,

    Yahweh has said that they (Elohim) will NOT destroy the life on Earth, but any real technological threat to the Elohim themselves or other worlds will be dealt with.

  • @strawberryelohist

    Fear of science?

    All perfectly explainable but everyone's so busy fearing the government and reading about conspiracy theories and twattish prophecies on YT that they fail to learn about simple physics. Shame.

  • @MoronAntidote Yes science shouldn't be feared unless it is in the hands of stupid or aggressive people, The Elohim certainly don't fear it, after all it got them to where they are today and enabled them to create life on this planet .

  • @strawberryelohist

    You're just crazy.

  • @MoronAntidote hahaha thank you : ) (sorry laughing is my moron antidote) btw we shall see who is crazy, remember to look up ; )

  • It is space debris and it bounces around. Very scary if your in space.

  • ITS IN ORBIT. orbiting objects cannot make course corrections like that. the maneuver the object makes should be impossible.

  • All I got to say that if there are indeed space aliens about, we are in a heap of trouble.

  • if the government wanted this secret and wanted this away from us they would remove it. . even if there was a pending invasion they knew about they would'nt tell the public

  • The amount of 'activity' in Space is terrifying...this is why NASA do their best to keep this out of the public eye... 'Ice Partice' explanations are a joke.

  • @generalzod4life wtf hahaha

  • its seems like its taken under water in a microscope...so its just plakton and amoebe and so on

  • @sorenm2

    ...Dude, do ypour homework before starting debunking.

    This is known as the Tether Incident, and well documented. You may even found clips showing NASA scientists trying to explain it away as something "normal".

    Please check your facts before forming an opinion....

  • ok...if you are right then there are millions ufo's around us

  • @funkster4

    Please do some proper research from credible sources before posting, otherwise your 'opinion' is worthless. Stating that this is simply 'the Tether Incident' without knowing the slightest fucking thing about it, and assuming that all scientists are liars without evidence, is simply proof that you should be put to sleep. You do not represent progress or truth, just the steady cyber-rot of humanity. Please die.

  • @MoronAntidote

    ..just found yr hilarious response: first debunkers like you are saying that the video is a fake, whithout even cheking. As explained, you will find videos where NASA scientists try to explain the phenomenon, something hard to do if there was no video in the first place...

    Then you say I am saying "all scientists are liars", which I'd like you to explain how you deduce this from my post...

    When you have no arguments, go fro the name-calling.. you are pathetic..

  • @funkster4

    You seem to be talking tosomeone else, since i have never claimed this video was fake.

    I can see no arguments in your post, so i'm going to leave it at that.

  • i do believe in alien's, otherwise the government wouldn't have to hide the facilities, but they do tend to hide instead, and that usually means that what they have in those places must be kept out of public knowledge before they can master it themselves for "national security" reasons. Witch is bullshit, because if a more advanced alien society wanted to harm us, they would face no problems in doing so, so were basically wasting time, all we need is one spaceship to salve all of this.

  • why dont you mentioned other star flying over passing on this camera view ??

    in my opinion this film catcher should micro scope filming time frame reflacte and result there is many star and object are crowssing by every single second this the universer and i believe there is still a large life form waiting for us to discover but i know we all here to read and see or even guess person will die never have a time for watching course by the pass few thoudsand years dynasty never been found so ..

  • You can see on the STS-75 Negative video, another object which is also changing it's course. At 2:53 sec the object is a little above the middle of the the tether, is going up and at 3:11 sec it stops and moves back (going down towards the tether) at 180 degrees. Also, the matter of the object's knob can be taken into consideration, obious can't be a natural shape...

  • I recomend to all people to view the documentary the case for nasa ufo,i want to say that kind of ufo shape was flmed in in Israel ,UK,Portugal,Mexico,this is some countrys that i now but i guest that exist more cases in more countrys,the normal state of the shape its in high frequency but some times its visible to the normal cameras and the human eyes,to make visible you need a ultra violet camera

  • I recommend that no-one watches that crockumentary from the fraudster David Sereda. If you want to learn the truth you'd be well advised to take such BS with a whole barrel of salt and research for yourselves. Some people are gullible - don't be one of them.

  • The STS-75 video was shot with a visible spectrum SIT Vidicon tube camera. The UV sensitive TOP camera was present on the mission, but used during specific scientific experiments only. It was not used to film the TSS-1R several days after the tether broke, as seen during the famous 'swarm' footage of ice/debris. See my videos for real TOP footage.

  • IF the Earth was on the left below the film's view, then that was a satelite which was orbiting the earth, and slowly coming towards the camera, but from that angle it looks like its turning. I would have to see before and after this footage to be sure, to make sure the motion stayed constant.

  • damn didn't notice

  • oh man.... the video isnt available anymore. All this is gonna do is bring in even more conspiracy nuts.

  • You watched the FIRST HALF on "NASA TV", not the second half. For the bit that wasn't so obviously faked, Read your Carl Sagan on this phenomenon. John Glenn during the first orbit by Americans reported the same stuff, and was depicted in the film "The Right Stuff". Nothing about this is new.

  • You're making a complete fool of yourself with this microscope nonsense. This is NASA footage plain and simple. I suggest you order a copy!

  • "Microscopes don't zoom in or out". You've obviously never even SEEN a microscope!! What's the big black wheel on the side of every compound ocular microscope then????? THE FOCUSSING KNOB!!!!!!! And whether you're using a dissecting scope, with its much greater depth of focus, or not, this effect can be reproduced by a five year old....there are even youtube films of the same thing. Develop some proper healthy scepticism, and your life won't be dominated by fakes and scams.

  • Filmed down a microscope into a dish of microorganisms, with audio tape over the top. For heaven's sake, the "UFOs" are displaying BROWNIAN MOTION!!!!!! And then somebody bumps the culture dish!!!! I pity the suckers taken in by this bollox. Poor, poor fake.

  • lol you moron, this is footage from nasa. was recorded live. its an infrared camera shooting an experimental tether which broke from the space shuttle.

    Anyway, nice find with the changing course "piece of debris".

  • NO, "Moron", the first half is NASA, the second half obviously spliced in over a soundtrack. I have subsequently found out, took me all of 5 minutes, that this was indeed a famous scam, perpetrated by a student of Univ. Minnesota. Next you're going to tell me the alien autopsy was real. Sucker. "One born every minute"....tell me, of the 500 million sperm, YOU were the one that made it to the egg???? That's really poor genetic stock. You believe the earth is flat too?

  • sucks to be you

  • you have no idea what brownian motion is. this doest look anyway near what brownian motion is.

  • yeh, i've only got a PhD in Microbiology. Never guess I look down a microscope for a living. So I have just a little bit of an idea what Brownian motion is, and I know enough quantum mechaics to derive it. Let me guess: you ARE a little green man whose UFO crashed at Roswell, and you've been living amongst us, planning the takeover of the earth. G-U-L-L-I-B-L-E.

  • you dont have a phd in microbiology because you sound like a 13 year old. anyway, this is the last time im going to comment on this video. go watch the full version of the video. microscopes dont zoom in and out, you have to rotate the revolver to switch the objective and besides, i watched this footage live on nasa tv.

  • @vnurcombe

    You found out nothing of the sort because you're a liar. This is all genuine NASA Select channel TV footage broadcast over cable. Why don't you order a copy from NASA and see for yourself. You could also watch the videos from the cable TV manager who recorded them right here on YT. I suggest you present your ridiculous theory to him personally (user:secretnasaman aka Martyn Stubbs).

  • dust particles are in orbit...they can't change directions...your staring at a bunch of UFO'S cruising the universal freeway.

  • There is one more object on the right side of the screen,that appears on 33rd second of the video that also changes course...

  • Do you want to know why they change course?

  • yes,

    it appears at 1:13 as bright light flying upwards, than turning downwards around 1:29 in sharp angle

  • sorry, 1:11 and 1:17

    it appears at 1:11 as bright light flying upwards, than turning downwards around 1:17 in sharp angle

  • There is one more object that changes cours on the upper right side of screen...

  • there are a lot of things in space as we all know.. but 1 thing i know that space does not have and that is 2-3 mile wide dust particles. I know what they are and any free thinking mind would too.

  • Okey you have convinced me lD

    But only one last question; if the object which is mainly in focus is the tether, why does the close and out of focus particles seem to get sharper and reveal more and more details the farther it zooms?

  • I wouldn't say the objects appear 'detailed' at any point in the video, but at some point you can see that they are not round discs at all, rather irregular shaped 'blobs' spinning through space the way you would expect them to. The explanation for the increase in 'detail' is that as the camera zooms out, the depth of field increases and near objects become better focused. I'm sure you'll agree this makes sense :)

  • Btw i'm guessing you've seen other footage showing the discs i'm talking about. This clip concentrates more on movement, rather than the supposed 'spaceships' people see when the camera is zoomed in.

  • Okey, I guess your right about the ice particles and reasons to why they could be following the ship into outer space :)

    But there is still one big question that needs to be answered before we can call this a "space debris cloud phenoman" .......;)...

    And that is; why do so many, if not most of the particles seen, seem to be on the other side of the tether, as it looks like they are traveling behind it. And if that was the case, than it would have to be some HUGE particels ....

  • That's just a commonly known camera limitation relating to 'depth of field'. When a camera is focused on a distant object, nearfield objects can become so out of focus they form a blurry transparent disc with characteristics determined by the design of the optics (a zoom lens such as the 6:1 used here tends to reduce depth of field, and in this case the construction produces peripheral notches which shift according to the position of the object in the FOV).

  • Light from the distant in-focus object dominates and appears in the foreground. Normally the nearfield objects would appear much fainter, but this camera is image intensified so they still appear bright. This is because the intensifier processes the image AFTER the optics have produced the apparent reversal of foreground/background. Another factor is that this camera blacks out portions of the image which are too bright (see NASA's lighting footage during MLE studies using this camera).

  • Obviously, when this occurs any object which is in the foreground will appear in shadow whenever the light intensity at a given point on the image exceeds the threshold set by the image processing circuity (this feature is often described as 'white blanking' or 'overbright protect' and can be found on Vidicon camera schematics).

  • Btw there are some demonstrations of this effect on YouTube and also quite a few photos available if you look for them. There's a very good NASA photo in which the crosshair on the lens appears to be behind the object of focus (the ISS i think).

  • WOW I've looked at this footage several times but I never noticed that particular object.

    It is truly changing both its course and its speed!

    If this isn't a good piece of evidence for extra-terrestrials than I don't know.

    I mean, its not like there is any wind out in outer space ;)

  • Actually, at this altitude space is not a total vacuum, and since the Shuttle, Tether and objects (ice and debris imo) are all travelling >17000mph, they are subject to aerodynamic drag (your 'wind'). Shuttle-born objects can interact with its plasma wake, and any which drift out into the plasma stream rushing by will be slowed by drag and begin to fall earthward (basic orbital mechanics). This is why all objects which appear to change course ultimately head in the same direction (i.e. earth).

  • Hey, if they couldn't be 100% sure that there no form of debris out in their path what-so-ever than they would NEVER have sent out their spaceship there. If there is so much debree and and particles hurling around there both their spaceship and the tether would long ago have been penetrated and destroyed.

    And I don't think that there is so many particles around the earth, not before you begin to come really close.

  • Firstly, i said 'Shuttle-born objects'. Common knowledge: ice and payload bay debris are virtually constant companions on Shuttle flights. Of course they monitor it, but objects which came from the Shuttle in the first place clearly do not pose much of a threat (low mass and relative velocity). Secondly, space debris is a huge problem and getting worse. Google 'Orbital Debris Quarterly News' before you state what you merely 'think' to be true as fact. There's more to this than you realise ;)

  • I know it is a big problem, and getting worse as you said, mainly because all of shit that astronauts toss out there, like ship parts and rockets.

    But had there been that many than it would have been a serious problem. And I don't see any reason to why ice should suddenly lose its grip from the ship when they are in outer space, as there isn't much force interacting with it. I would believe that most of the ice that could break would do so when they rushed away from the atmosphere.

  • There are a surprising number of ice sources on the Shuttle, e.g. the cooling system's flash evaporator, waste water dumps (fuel cell, crew by-products etc.) and many thruster nozzles which frequently leak. Some ice is ejected and some gets shaken loose by regular thruster firings (needed to maintain orbit/course and even change course). If you read NASA's studies you'll find that ice/debris from the Shuttle can re-contact later on due to orbital mechanics. It's interesting stuff, go read it.

  • It's not about the amount of ice/debris, it's about mass and velocity relative to the Shuttle. Ice/debris FROM the Shuttle is low in mass and travelling at roughly the same velocity as the Shuttle, so it doesn't matter how much there is, it poses little danger. Yes, very small objects travelling in different orbits can be dangerous (which is why NASA tracks them and actively avoids them), but that's a different matter altogether. Shuttles have survived many such impacts before (can link docs).

  • they will eat all humans that are afraid of them so dont run

  • maybe his mama called him home 4 dinner

  • Everyone of these objects are UFos or demons like the bible calls them... the astronaughts are aliens nasa is the alien headquarters..... but they will only land when the trumpet sounds like its says in the book of revelation... and the astroid or MOTHERSHIP which is named Wormwood will come to earth its in the bible people

  • vay amına koyayımbe

  • Could be explained by an impact with a smaller, darker, less reflective object.

  • Keep looking because I saw another one do it in about the mid-upper right quadrant. It also appears out of nowhere. When you see the directions to "keep your eye..." look down at the third line where it has the word "video", keep looking in the area where the D and E are. That's where the object first appears and it makes a u-turn in the opposite direction.

  • They're called "criters".

    Possibly in a slightly higher spectrum.

  • Yeah...one object is affected by something, big, blue, called Earth and the others aren't? Give me a break...try harder.

  • oh yeah of course, the planet next to the 12 mile long tether, how silly of us.

  • For the record, this reply was supposed to be further down, under one of those who replied to my original comment.

  • wow ive seen this footage many times and this video actually shows the objects change course. thanks!

  • there are several objects that change course and other that circle arround. watch carefully other objects as well...and you will see it.

  • MoronAntidote ive actually asked a friend of mine who has a friend that is involved in the knowledge of this mission. Most of his friend's collegues dont know what the altering course objects are. Its classified as a real "Unidentified object"

  • I think you will find there are people at NASA who have seen this type of optical phenomenon many times, and are satisfied that it is not anomalous. Sorry, but i'd have to see documented proof before i could accept the alleged 'unidentified object' classification. However, it is possible that something can be 'unidentified' while being insignificant.

  • It is very difficult to look at an object in this footage and say for example "that is a paint flake", but it is possible to deduce that it is in fact a small particle which displays no sign of intelligence. It remains unidentified, but so what? People get far too excited over such terminology.

  • Were these people around when NASA was still using Vidicon cameras? The latest documented references i have for these cameras was 1997. If they weren't, then it is not surprising that they don't understand this footage. The cameras have improved immensely since then, which is why these so-called UFOs haven't been seen since.

  • Then why do we still not have a detailed explanation as to what causes these things? That could dismiss all of this... assuming you are correct. I mean, if it's not anomalous, then tell us what it is exactly.

  • There are detailed explanations and they're not hard to find. The problem is some people just don't want to believe them. That's their problem not NASA's. I could mention Jim Oberg, whom i personally regard as a highly qualified and experienced guy with an honest agenda, but if people just think he's a NASA stooge who is part of some great conspiracy then ignorance and fantasy will prevail. I've checked out his claims and they stack up, but i found that it's far more complex than most realise.

  • Ok. Please direct me to a detailed explanation or two. And also, can anyone link to newer footage of these objects from a more recent mission?

  • search the sts 80 foootage

  • More like you fell out the dumb assssssss tree!!!!  eeeeeaaaaaahhhhhhh

  • Why does everyone assume that none of the objects should change course? Contrary to popular belief, this footage was shot with a visible spectrum SIT Vidicon tube camera mounted in the Payload Bay. It was no more capable of imaging 'force' than any other camera present on the mission. The mission took place in the Ionosphere. The Shuttle was charged, the TSS-1R was charged, and the ice/debris was charged, implying the presence of electrostatic forces and consequent interactions.

  • two objects change course? more like 200.

  • well, could it be space junk that was hit by another piece of junk?

  • there also appears an object (in the mid) right-to-left, clearly bending its course toward the bottom of the screen.

  • What about STS-80?

  • what about sts-114?

  • These objects are a mystery for there are many of them and some appear out of nowhere. Also, space debris floats freely, is 'spaced' out, and the looks vary on the debris. NASA reported these objects as appearing out of nowhere and even admitted that this is usually not the case with small non-flashing ice or random debris. How much Electricity did that Tether store?

  • Some say they are meteors. that's impossible. this is infrared footage these are all hot items. meteors only burn when they get into the atmosphere. these are all ships...or some other hot object. period

  • do u believe in aliens and UFO's and area 51?

  • hell ya idk y pplz don't

  • NASA official : don't ya see it boy, thats a meteor hittin some other meateor, jeez.

  • BTW, the reason so may of the objects seem to appear and then dissapear is because they are moving in and out of the shadow of the shuttle.

  • i don't think that is cause of the shadow, look closely at 30sec. on the bottom of the tether, you saw one appear another one just after and then there is one whe pass just on their left, this one come from a long distance and he's not affect by shadow.

    extra-dimensional spacecraft? teleporting?

  • Actually there is also a third object that does not follow a straight line. In the bottom left hand corner of the film just above the white curved object or glare there is an object that moves from left to right in a curved path moving towards the bottom of the screen slightly. So either there is a lot of ufo's in orbit that just happened to appear in this shot or this is in no way a unique and unusual phenomena.

  • I guess it wanted to go faster and changed direction. UFO's are nippy little things. i know its not, but some footage just looks like a touch shineing into a fish tank with bits floating inside.

  • it looks to me like small objects in water. daphnia. and can someone tell me or at least clarify, how you get a ten mile long tether into space, especially, given the footage its width must be huge also,as mentioned in the vid, much wider than expected...i estimate about a third of a mile wide. big 'tether' that.

  • I did a video to this and like you saw that and the more I watched the more I saw some move around each other. And notice how none collide as well. To me it looks like UFO the way they pulsate all looking the same, Great video by the way. Good to see that highlighted :-)

  • what's going on..

  • Wow, there are 2. Crazy!

  • I've watched this clip so many times & never noticed that, thanks for posting, & yeah they both seem to carry out similar manoeuvers, i'd like to hear nasa talk their way out of this one.

  • NASA's official explanation will be Weather/Space Phenomena, Flying Space debris, Meteor and what not...I guarantee NASA will never say or use the word UFO..Everyone is scared of inside job..I guess everyone signed the death contract when they joined the NASA company..

  • What are we looking at here?

  • Actually, in watching this again, there is ANOTHER object that changes course and speed as well... under the tether, an object approaches the tether, stops, and does a nearly 180 degree turn and goes the opposite direction.

  • nice catch, i've never notice this before but did you see that?: they don't only change course they apearfrom NOWHERE too that a look at full video(6:27 lenght) and watch at 5:05 you'll see a little ufo appear and just later a bigger one,it's on downside of the tether, there is certainly others but i didn't pay attention to them.

  • they are making joke with our face, it's all, but what is sure is we are not alone. saw them from my own eyes during the belgian ufo wave(around 20 years ago), i've seen this triangular shape with 4 lights and few seconds later we heard a fighter jet flying in the same direction of the ufo, i was 5 or 6 and it's like it was yesterday and i'll never forget it!

  • after re-watching the video there is so many who appear/disappear. i didn't know that ice particle could teleport herself and blinking too and also change direction and controlling speed! so i guess i will fall asleep less dumb than before!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more