You can definitely see shit on the Moon in this video. And some of those craters look so fresh. I'd like to get some old photos and compare areas of the surface.. The bastards are probably mining Gold, while using our tax dollars to pay for the operations. I can't wait till their little game is over.
...sorry for my bad school english :). Do you think a 6,4 Mrd. US-Dollar Hubble Teleskop is not able to take highly detailed pics from the moon and show us some details like the rover or other stuff left on the moon?! They could but they do not want! Look at all the pictures from the moon taken by nasa for the public! They do not look better than pictures you made with your home telescope from the balcony :). Conclusion, there is somthing going on at the moon you should not know!Awesome things!
It can't. The Moon is damn far away even if it looks like you can grab it ;) For Example: The Apollo descent stages left on the lunar surface are too small to be seen by Hubble, which can see objects as small as 60-75 yards, about three-quarters the length of a soccer field. The left-behind descent stages are only about the size of a small truck.The moon is a difficult target for Hubble because it moves across the sky faster than Hubble can track it and is very dim in ultraviolet light.
@PhenomenonEarth I agree with you 100% with todays tec .. we should be able to look at whats on the moon in great detail ... Somthing is wrong with this picture to me ...
Has anyone seen, or taken photos from earth (or from Hubble), that shows any equipment left behind by man on the moon? If so, where can these images be found and viewed? For example, can one see the lunar rover left behind? Just curious... It seems we can look into, or see other galaxies now, so seeing high resolutions photos of the moon would seem plausible ? or am I mistaken ?
An object on the Moon 4 meters (4.37 yards) across, viewed from HST, would be about 0.002 arcsec in size. The highest resolution instrument currently on HST is the Advanced Camera for Surveys at 0.03 arcsec. So anything we left on the Moon cannot be resolved in any HST image. It would just appear as a dot.
what about these telecscopes that can see into other galaxies?... we can see other galaxies, but we cannot get high resolution of our own moon ? Just a novice here trying to understand... not trying to be difficult... please let me know !
The worlds best telescopes on the ground can rarely see detail that is less than 1 arcsecond wide or differentiate between two stars that are less than 1 arcsecond apart in the sky. This is because turbulence in Earth's atmosphere causes images to ripple and shimmer. By comparison, Hubble can see detail down to less than 0.1 arcsecond across — more than 10 times clearer but still a long way from 0.002 resolution required to see any NASA equipment on the moon.
Google search "nasa LRO". Then you will se a link which says LRO see's apollo landing sites. Those are the earliest images. There are some images with better resolution too somewhere:)
Oh yes, you're right :). normally the nasa could take crystal clear highly detailed photos from the moon but this pictures are not for public :))). Because you could see details on the moon that there should not be :) (my opinion).or why do you think they make pictures from other galaxies (unbelievable far away) but only milky and very bad pictures from the moon?! Look the pictures from spy satellites in the orbit, they can make pictures from bubble gum papers from above, if they want :).
My God ! - Awsome, You should be working at NASA for what youve done here. I dont think its going to be long before we can zoom into and hopefully see the flag !! Well done
Amazing video & Song!!, I was wondering if you can recommend me a nice & not too expensive home telescope to watch wireless on a mac computer. I heard a BETI devices helps with the wireless but do you know a telescope for an amateur as myself?
What Scope ? ask 10 people you will get 10 different answers
IMO the best bang for your buck is a Newtonian reflector telescope you can pick up a 250mm X 1200mm like mine on a dobsonian mount for $500 - $800 this type of scope is just about the largest that is practical for home use, it is powerful,it will fit into a standard car for field trips and one person can carry it, the BETI Bluetooth system is ideal for wireless guidance control I have used one and it was very easy to operate.
@algorithm21century on google moon ..everywhere the images have been patched or blured ... pls check their location and film those location on ur camera.... i am sure u will hit millions views to the video.... and we really want to see those blocked areas of the moon. keep posting good videos like these. :)
The Moon is in synchronous rotation, which means it rotates about its axis in about the same time it takes to orbit the Earth. This results in it keeping nearly the same face turned towards the Earth at all times.
Sorry about that I shall consider myself chastised and corrected, synchronous rotation it is. Which to the uninitiated means that for all practical purposes the moon does not rotate on it's axis in relation to the earth.
The moon is retreating from the earth at a rate of just over 3.5 cm per year, I am not going to let it spoil my day but it means that eventually our moon will be dragged off into space by a gravitational force greater than the earth's.
The moon does not rotate about its own axis so it always shows the same side to the earth, apparently this is quite common in the universe captured moon's usually stop rotating due to the gravitational pull of the planet, our moon has a slight wobble so at certain times we can see a very small portion of the dark side, interesting stuff.
good vid!! man o man if only you could watch the backside of the moon... you would be in for a ride i think :) i bought a skywatcher 200mm i hope to get a good vieuw whit it also
They can read a post stamp down on Earth from Earth - orbit based satelts. but they can't show the landing site of the alleged 1969 "Moon Landing"? Lies vs. common sense
I have seen some very odd things whilst watching the moon such as moving lights unfortunately seeing something is one thing, capturing a quality image of said thing is an entirely different proposition for backyard technology.
As for the yanks landing on the moon in the 1960s ? PULL THE OTHER ONE MATE ! If they had been there you can bet your ass they would be there NOW mining like crazy, and setting up very big GUNS to control the earth. It never happened !
If I can take shots like this from my backyard with an el-cheapo telescope and camera,I wonder why NASA don't use some of their high tech imaging gear such as Hubble to show us the equipment supposedly left on the moon, could it be they have never actually been there. I find it hard to believe they got there and back using the computer power of a Commodore 64.
well daddy let me say this....extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof...why don't you open that big vault of yours, take out some of the footage, and post it big boy?
i like to look during this phase also. theres a structure thats rectangular inside a triple crator. at 1:48 it's about dead center of the screen. those are pefecr corners and the side facing us looks like 3 large doors or windows. too many perfect right angles and in close proximity to each other to not be a structure. alien structure. i see many others
Nice! I see nothing at all. On second glance there's more than meets the eyes. Despite what NASA and other might say, It looks like there could be some life there, who can say for sure wont so be your own judge. Dots in the craters could be refuge. They seem close to each other or in long distances apart but straight away from another. out post if you will. We could be getting lied to. Peace
super!!!!
2424Andrey 3 weeks ago
good!!!!!!!
2424Andrey 3 weeks ago
Stupendo :)
ragerocknight 1 month ago
You can definitely see shit on the Moon in this video. And some of those craters look so fresh. I'd like to get some old photos and compare areas of the surface.. The bastards are probably mining Gold, while using our tax dollars to pay for the operations. I can't wait till their little game is over.
HemiHead66 1 year ago
at 4:56.its many artefacts....shift the head at left and look careful...full scren and look the shadow of this objects...
nsideurhead 1 year ago
very nice
giofrasa 1 year ago
i have a telescope and i want to take pictures like this i have similar magnification but how to i send to my laptop
judgementIV 2 years ago
Turn your head sideways to the right and view....you'lll be shocked!
oilpatchgirl 2 years ago
very nice!!!
bosb33r 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice! Thanks for sharing
HOTRODLED 2 years ago 2
...sorry for my bad school english :). Do you think a 6,4 Mrd. US-Dollar Hubble Teleskop is not able to take highly detailed pics from the moon and show us some details like the rover or other stuff left on the moon?! They could but they do not want! Look at all the pictures from the moon taken by nasa for the public! They do not look better than pictures you made with your home telescope from the balcony :). Conclusion, there is somthing going on at the moon you should not know!Awesome things!
PhenomenonEarth 2 years ago 2
It can't. The Moon is damn far away even if it looks like you can grab it ;) For Example: The Apollo descent stages left on the lunar surface are too small to be seen by Hubble, which can see objects as small as 60-75 yards, about three-quarters the length of a soccer field. The left-behind descent stages are only about the size of a small truck.The moon is a difficult target for Hubble because it moves across the sky faster than Hubble can track it and is very dim in ultraviolet light.
lordoid 2 years ago
@PhenomenonEarth I agree with you 100% with todays tec .. we should be able to look at whats on the moon in great detail ... Somthing is wrong with this picture to me ...
KayWal1981 1 year ago
what is that long thing in the crater at 1:36? It def. doesnt belong there.
hrobbins 2 years ago 4
Has anyone seen, or taken photos from earth (or from Hubble), that shows any equipment left behind by man on the moon? If so, where can these images be found and viewed? For example, can one see the lunar rover left behind? Just curious... It seems we can look into, or see other galaxies now, so seeing high resolutions photos of the moon would seem plausible ? or am I mistaken ?
MusicTubeLover 2 years ago
An object on the Moon 4 meters (4.37 yards) across, viewed from HST, would be about 0.002 arcsec in size. The highest resolution instrument currently on HST is the Advanced Camera for Surveys at 0.03 arcsec. So anything we left on the Moon cannot be resolved in any HST image. It would just appear as a dot.
algorithm21century 2 years ago
what about these telecscopes that can see into other galaxies?... we can see other galaxies, but we cannot get high resolution of our own moon ? Just a novice here trying to understand... not trying to be difficult... please let me know !
MusicTubeLover 2 years ago
The worlds best telescopes on the ground can rarely see detail that is less than 1 arcsecond wide or differentiate between two stars that are less than 1 arcsecond apart in the sky. This is because turbulence in Earth's atmosphere causes images to ripple and shimmer. By comparison, Hubble can see detail down to less than 0.1 arcsecond across — more than 10 times clearer but still a long way from 0.002 resolution required to see any NASA equipment on the moon.
algorithm21century 2 years ago
The lunar recoinassence Orbiter has photographed the apollo equipment. Sorry for spelling hehe
joachim2464 2 years ago
Can you provide a link where these images can be viewed ?
MusicTubeLover 2 years ago
Google search "nasa LRO". Then you will se a link which says LRO see's apollo landing sites. Those are the earliest images. There are some images with better resolution too somewhere:)
joachim2464 2 years ago
Thanks Joachim !
First solid answer to my question !
Cheers
MusicTubeLover 2 years ago
Oh yes, you're right :). normally the nasa could take crystal clear highly detailed photos from the moon but this pictures are not for public :))). Because you could see details on the moon that there should not be :) (my opinion).or why do you think they make pictures from other galaxies (unbelievable far away) but only milky and very bad pictures from the moon?! Look the pictures from spy satellites in the orbit, they can make pictures from bubble gum papers from above, if they want :).
PhenomenonEarth 2 years ago
My God ! - Awsome, You should be working at NASA for what youve done here. I dont think its going to be long before we can zoom into and hopefully see the flag !! Well done
itsonlyrocknroll22 2 years ago
Amazing video & Song!!, I was wondering if you can recommend me a nice & not too expensive home telescope to watch wireless on a mac computer. I heard a BETI devices helps with the wireless but do you know a telescope for an amateur as myself?
Thank you
nekbeth 2 years ago
What Scope ? ask 10 people you will get 10 different answers
IMO the best bang for your buck is a Newtonian reflector telescope you can pick up a 250mm X 1200mm like mine on a dobsonian mount for $500 - $800 this type of scope is just about the largest that is practical for home use, it is powerful,it will fit into a standard car for field trips and one person can carry it, the BETI Bluetooth system is ideal for wireless guidance control I have used one and it was very easy to operate.
.
algorithm21century 2 years ago
@algorithm21century on google moon ..everywhere the images have been patched or blured ... pls check their location and film those location on ur camera.... i am sure u will hit millions views to the video.... and we really want to see those blocked areas of the moon. keep posting good videos like these. :)
mrmorganuk 2 weeks ago
The Moon is in synchronous rotation, which means it rotates about its axis in about the same time it takes to orbit the Earth. This results in it keeping nearly the same face turned towards the Earth at all times.
aranyoshazi 2 years ago
Sorry about that I shall consider myself chastised and corrected, synchronous rotation it is. Which to the uninitiated means that for all practical purposes the moon does not rotate on it's axis in relation to the earth.
algorithm21century 2 years ago
DID YOU KNOW ???
The moon is retreating from the earth at a rate of just over 3.5 cm per year, I am not going to let it spoil my day but it means that eventually our moon will be dragged off into space by a gravitational force greater than the earth's.
algorithm21century 2 years ago
The moon does not rotate about its own axis so it always shows the same side to the earth, apparently this is quite common in the universe captured moon's usually stop rotating due to the gravitational pull of the planet, our moon has a slight wobble so at certain times we can see a very small portion of the dark side, interesting stuff.
algorithm21century 2 years ago
good vid!! man o man if only you could watch the backside of the moon... you would be in for a ride i think :) i bought a skywatcher 200mm i hope to get a good vieuw whit it also
cefrio 2 years ago
They can read a post stamp down on Earth from Earth - orbit based satelts. but they can't show the landing site of the alleged 1969 "Moon Landing"? Lies vs. common sense
vladika07 2 years ago
I second that.
DragonNews 2 years ago
I have seen some very odd things whilst watching the moon such as moving lights unfortunately seeing something is one thing, capturing a quality image of said thing is an entirely different proposition for backyard technology.
As for the yanks landing on the moon in the 1960s ? PULL THE OTHER ONE MATE ! If they had been there you can bet your ass they would be there NOW mining like crazy, and setting up very big GUNS to control the earth. It never happened !
algorithm21century 2 years ago
Comment removed
CVPTV 2 years ago
Very nice video
filipeamc21 2 years ago
Great vid. Very informative, thanks.
GRIDKEEPER 2 years ago
If I can take shots like this from my backyard with an el-cheapo telescope and camera,I wonder why NASA don't use some of their high tech imaging gear such as Hubble to show us the equipment supposedly left on the moon, could it be they have never actually been there. I find it hard to believe they got there and back using the computer power of a Commodore 64.
algorithm21century 3 years ago
algorithm21century ,i agree,im sure with the hubble then can read a Fortune Cookie on the moon !!
sn9696 2 years ago
please try to capture the rovers sir..
johnsmdm 3 years ago
Comment removed
CVPTV 2 years ago
well daddy let me say this....extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof...why don't you open that big vault of yours, take out some of the footage, and post it big boy?
johnsmdm 2 years ago
Comment removed
CVPTV 2 years ago
Comment removed
BanderHM 2 years ago
amazing video well done
farcry2LFC 3 years ago
Super video ... I will buy my own Telescope .... Really great ... thx.
Mikkel54 3 years ago
Thank you for watching
algorithm21century 3 years ago
REALLY wonderful creation! Thank You.
Alicia7777777 3 years ago
i like to look during this phase also. theres a structure thats rectangular inside a triple crator. at 1:48 it's about dead center of the screen. those are pefecr corners and the side facing us looks like 3 large doors or windows. too many perfect right angles and in close proximity to each other to not be a structure. alien structure. i see many others
lima7487 3 years ago
Did u see the tranquility Base?
TUCUPITA4545 3 years ago
wow! this is rearly a good video! thank you!
etee08 3 years ago
a gem of a vid
philwarinsky 3 years ago
Nice! I see nothing at all. On second glance there's more than meets the eyes. Despite what NASA and other might say, It looks like there could be some life there, who can say for sure wont so be your own judge. Dots in the craters could be refuge. They seem close to each other or in long distances apart but straight away from another. out post if you will. We could be getting lied to. Peace
Snowman374th 3 years ago