You would get better performance with AMD over intel, in other words......Intel is good when it comes to video editing and wat not, but it lacks in gaming alot in some cases. AMD easy to OC, better price, better performance, better gaming.
Umm no thanks i dont do drugs, and Yes intel is good but better not so much. I have nothing against Intel my friend. Matter fact i have and intel setup as of now, intel q9650 2x 9800 GTX+, OCZ ram 8gb, GIGABYTE EP45-UD3P MOTHERBOARD (which was a combo with the cpu) etc. And i tested the INTEL vs AMD Quad core. Both CPU's where OC to 4.1 (water cooling) ran many different kinds of test and found that AMD did better overall.
That statement is a lie. Intel performs over 50% better in most cases compared to AMD. AMD fails with Heat becouse they lack E0 steppings which intel have. E0 steppings can go all the way and beyonf 5Ghz with a water cooler.. I run 4.22 Ghz on air, i never go beyond 65c after 12 hours 100% stress test, heck i could go to 4.50ghz np.
The voltages is also a important factor. As AMD chips can't handle high volts, they wont gain any significant performance increase.
Ok well i really dont feel like debting this anymore so im gonna leave you with this. I support BOTH Intel and AMD OK. They are both great CPU's that have alot to offer, i just choose AMD over intel.Thats all i have to say.
Well, ok. But my main point is that AMD has "less" to offer becouse it's cheaper. i7 for instance supports heavy boosting in multi-threaded games and applications. AMD, is only focusing on gaming, but even there it performs nothing close to a intel chip becouse intel chips clock higher.
But, if you're on a very short budget you should buy a AMD, until you can afford an i7 or i9..
Intel may be the consider the BEST cpu, BUT AMD brings alot to the table and yes AMD is cheaper but like i said it brings alot to the table. And times are hard man some people can get the high intel CPUs so they get AMD and some find it better then intel.
Times is only hard for people with below average work.. I buy new hardware every month. Heck, i have a E8500 in a corner, dusting down. Also, i belive i have some AMD chips around lmao..
piloah i agree seems very laggy could be that its a shitty mobo,i have the same cpu and a 8800gt but with a 790i evga mobo and 4 gigs of ddr3 oz on vista enterprise but i dont have this game, but my crysis runs about 32 fps on just high settings no lag like this!
9600GSO havent heard 8800 series still out perform the 9600 series but nice anyway. Also if you want to test graphics play a more high powered game flight simulator isnt very power guzzling.
FSX is extremely power guzzling, with max FPS there's still not a CPU/Video card combination that can sustain 30fps in a location like Los Angeles with all sliders maxxed... Just take a look at flight simulator forums and you'll know...
fuck this
syklopxx 1 week ago
Intel's E0 stepping clocks higher than AMD anytime anywhere. That's a fact.
stovnergutt 2 years ago
You would get better performance with AMD over intel, in other words......Intel is good when it comes to video editing and wat not, but it lacks in gaming alot in some cases. AMD easy to OC, better price, better performance, better gaming.
FlyHere660 2 years ago
Are you high? Intel is better with everything compared to AMD. AMD is a cheaper solution for those with a budget.
Q9650 on 4.50 Ghz air is somthing you wont every achieve with any AMDx4 quad core.. i5, i7 and soon i9.. Bye bye AMD, rest in piece Erhem "peace"..
stovnergutt 2 years ago
Umm no thanks i dont do drugs, and Yes intel is good but better not so much. I have nothing against Intel my friend. Matter fact i have and intel setup as of now, intel q9650 2x 9800 GTX+, OCZ ram 8gb, GIGABYTE EP45-UD3P MOTHERBOARD (which was a combo with the cpu) etc. And i tested the INTEL vs AMD Quad core. Both CPU's where OC to 4.1 (water cooling) ran many different kinds of test and found that AMD did better overall.
FlyHere660 2 years ago
That statement is a lie. Intel performs over 50% better in most cases compared to AMD. AMD fails with Heat becouse they lack E0 steppings which intel have. E0 steppings can go all the way and beyonf 5Ghz with a water cooler.. I run 4.22 Ghz on air, i never go beyond 65c after 12 hours 100% stress test, heck i could go to 4.50ghz np.
The voltages is also a important factor. As AMD chips can't handle high volts, they wont gain any significant performance increase.
stovnergutt 2 years ago
Ok well i really dont feel like debting this anymore so im gonna leave you with this. I support BOTH Intel and AMD OK. They are both great CPU's that have alot to offer, i just choose AMD over intel.Thats all i have to say.
FlyHere660 2 years ago
Well, ok. But my main point is that AMD has "less" to offer becouse it's cheaper. i7 for instance supports heavy boosting in multi-threaded games and applications. AMD, is only focusing on gaming, but even there it performs nothing close to a intel chip becouse intel chips clock higher.
But, if you're on a very short budget you should buy a AMD, until you can afford an i7 or i9..
stovnergutt 2 years ago
Intel may be the consider the BEST cpu, BUT AMD brings alot to the table and yes AMD is cheaper but like i said it brings alot to the table. And times are hard man some people can get the high intel CPUs so they get AMD and some find it better then intel.
FlyHere660 2 years ago
Times is only hard for people with below average work.. I buy new hardware every month. Heck, i have a E8500 in a corner, dusting down. Also, i belive i have some AMD chips around lmao..
stovnergutt 2 years ago
Actually, FSX on a quad core period will yield less performance than a Core 2 Duo, simply because FSX is single threaded.
Intel or AMD.
CJCA915 2 years ago
I love how you whore yourself to absolute death.
It's funny shit
jonthedoors 2 years ago
yeah, but why not 4 gigs?
Intelpentium54321 2 years ago
hey. your graphics are good but you might want increase the amount of pixels your running. there are a few jagged lines on the aircrafts
hamzathespartan117 2 years ago
I just got an NVIDIA Geforce 9600GSO
i havent installed it yet but if anyone has it how good are the graphics on FSX
RollerCoasterTycoon8 2 years ago
Guys INTEL Sucks Penis Get a AMD the BEST SHIT YOU GOT FOR GAMING Get a AMD it Ownes Intel 101
elmayimbeNy 2 years ago
you remind me of some kid I go to school with, an ass
Intelpentium54321 2 years ago
1:04 big graphics twitch
but overall Excellent video
theofficalPwner 2 years ago
yes, it comes with wireless lan
oingoboingo12 2 years ago
that is not fucking very high settings, maybe the water settings are but you're still in the middle of nowhere! My computer specs:
Intel core 2 quad q6600
Ati radeon HD 3650
6gb ddr-2 ram
640 gb hard drive
windows vista home premium 64 bit
wireless networking
All for 679.99
Gateway DX
oingoboingo12 2 years ago
Your comment doesn't prove anything, oingoboingo12.
kzrick188 2 years ago
Everyone the reason the graphics are laggy its because of fraps.
conyo985 3 years ago
would the 9600M GT be worse or better than a 9600 GSO?
QwertyAzerty2009 3 years ago
how much is that computer??
TheNixaConservator 3 years ago
400 pounds and my graphics card was 100 pounds so 500 altoghether
benturbops3 3 years ago
piloah i agree seems very laggy could be that its a shitty mobo,i have the same cpu and a 8800gt but with a 790i evga mobo and 4 gigs of ddr3 oz on vista enterprise but i dont have this game, but my crysis runs about 32 fps on just high settings no lag like this!
joecobra1234 3 years ago
it got a little skippy wit the beechcraft but good water and land graphics and it was running smoothly
piloah 3 years ago
so what resolution do you use?
kalapukko 3 years ago
1024*768
benturbops3 3 years ago
wish i had a super computer like u i have fsx on a toshiba notebook the quality is quiet good but no buildings or trees
aircraftkid 3 years ago
Laggy McLagstien. Game is a hog though...
GravitonProductions 3 years ago
you will get better fps if you turn down the auto terrain generator i.e the trees and shit. I have same setup as you and get better frame rate
cjellwood 3 years ago
yes but i like the best quality posible
benturbops3 3 years ago
20 fps is not possible.
I could also put my settings higher, and it isn't worth the FPS. by the way, tune your resolution up.
i'd rather play in 1920* 1200 then your shitty reso. Your resolution also determines the level of detail in case you didn't know
shadowdemon2003 3 years ago
yup im gonna do crysis soon subscribe for more vids!!!
benturbops3 3 years ago
9600GSO havent heard 8800 series still out perform the 9600 series but nice anyway. Also if you want to test graphics play a more high powered game flight simulator isnt very power guzzling.
CompTech323 3 years ago
yh the 8800gt and gtx are more powerful than the 9600 range and i will upload more vids like crysis so subscribe for more!!
benturbops3 3 years ago
FSX is extremely power guzzling, with max FPS there's still not a CPU/Video card combination that can sustain 30fps in a location like Los Angeles with all sliders maxxed... Just take a look at flight simulator forums and you'll know...
fsdreamscapes 3 years ago
"fsdreamscapes"
Even an INTEL quad 4 ghz
with quad CROSSFIRE
Radeon HD 4870
and maybe 8 gig ram
with nothing but SSD's
Thats gotta run it eh?
(im not being rude or mean im just askin')
oreo4president 3 years ago
FSX is extremely power guzzling - because they don't know how to properly design that f...ng engine!:/It's so sad...
MyPassionsss 3 years ago