Added: 2 years ago
From: android217
Views: 24,620
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (915)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ELVIS IS (UN) BEATABLE.

    Oh my god.....I love the phrase...

  • Well....I love them both.

    But if I have to choose who is first, I would say of course The Beatles.

    I mean, they can open the concert, as the first band, then we will have the real thing, THE KING.

  • I never really like Elvis.....the Beatles are way better :) there more successful. And there better singers. That's why there the greatest artist of all time

  • @dogkiller07 I respect your opinion and all but you say the Beatles were more successful? Elvis made Rock N Roll and has 149 #1 hits in the US alone! The Beatles only had 20 in the US and even John Lennon admitted "Before Elvis,there was nothing." But don't get me wrong The Beatles are kick ass! Really both of the are!

  • @dogkiller07 They are better singers?

    What does that mean?

    They use better the singer sewing machine than Elvis? They have more sewing skills?

    Is that it? I never heard such a thing.

    Nobody sang, sings or will sing better than Elvis Aron Presley, better known as the King.

  • ok, the beatles are the best, but if there were no elvis no beatles, elvis was the king, but elvis gave the beatles the name before her died, not right before, i think, u'll know

  • Best band in history and the king cannot compete; the universe would implode

  • You are also comparing one person to 4 individuals so the one outweighs the rest! Elvis came first and even John Lennon said it best "Before Elvis,there was nothing" so you can't dispute when you here it from the horses mouth! Even a Beatle member says that Elvis is the best!

  • @rayelvistcb57 john lennon said that because he respect him,but i i think john knew he was better than elvis

  • "Before Elvis there was nothing" John Lennon.

  • Comment removed

  • no creo que pueda haber ningun tipo de comparacion, porque ambos son genios de la musica claro en sus respectivos estilos, ya que ambos crearon sus propios estilos.

    I don't think that can be any kind of comparison between both because both are wonderfull musicians, they are genius, both create their own style. both are a true idols

  • the king elvis presley !!!!!..............=D

  • BEATLES4EVER!!! :D

  • LIKE IT OR NOT, MAINSTREAM MUSIC IS STILL IMAGED IN WHAT ELVIS DID MANY YEARS AGO!!

  • @MeYouView And thats why most popular mainstream guys (Justin Bieber) has Elvis Presley hair type instead of the Beatles...im sorry friend but the Beatles whipped Elvis out of his boots

  • @xtremerockomaniac That hair is very Beatlelish looking isn't it? It's a popular hairstyle these days. Without question The Beatles influence is still being felt but comparing the two i'd say that Elvis has made more of an impact on society then the fab four. In reality to compare the two really is stupid. Music is not a competion. If people want that they should go into sports!

  • @MeYouView Altough i absolutly agree that Elvis is a valuable peace for society and rock n roll but i see Elvis more like a superstar and performer compared to the Beatles that were actual artists and were songwriters and the style and some musics like Day in the Life, Lucy in the sky with diamonds, Let it be, Hey Jude, Strawberry fields forever hell even revolution 9 still to this day can fit the modern mold...not to mention the creative evolution of the Beatles

  • @MeYouView you have atleast 4 diferent phases (the moptop please please me, rubber soul, Sgt.pepper psicadelic and white album to abbey road)...and what evolution did i see in elvis the studd elvis and fat glamour Elvis after the army days shell of his former self...i''ll say this about Elvis he was a lauching point performer who influenced alot of famous musicians like the Beatles

  • Comment removed

  • i would have to say elvis presly. yea the beatles are good.... but hes called the king of rock for a reason. now for the person who said mj was better than him..... no. ya he wrote his sons but in my opinion, he didnt have nearly as great of a voice that elvis had. yea hes good too, these are all great artists but i think elvis is slightly better than both of em.

  • BEATLES!!!!!

  • Elvis wins

  • Beatles win easily.

    But this is not a fair comparison..

    Elvis had a unique voice and was a great performer. (I like about 10 of his songs)

    But The Beatles were so good that 99% of their songs are a masterpiece (we will never see anything like that again)

  • Elvis couldn't write songs, The Beatles could. That's a no brainer.

    How are you going to sing something if you can't even write it?

  • Elvis had the singing skills, Beatles had the songwriting skills. MJ beats them both as he sang better than both of them, and also wrote songs.

  • the beatles is batter but elvis is very good

  • ELVIS blows them out of the water. I love how it goes from an extremely powerful song like "If I Can Dream" to some goofy ass Beatles song with their bowl cute, buck teeth and massive noses to the gorgeous face of The King. Elvis >>>The Beatles.

  • @TWet3726 that is not cool and u r wrong.

  • BEATLES no question, John Lennon > elvis

  • elvis is evil so dont mess around with him!

  • @MyDreamside OMG,Elvis will take our souls!!

  • They are both as Brilliant as each other! Lets all admit there both better than Michael Jackson and Modern Music!

  • Elvis...not even close. Better vocalist, performer... Better music

  • @MarkRogersTV Elvis influenced a lot of people including the Beatles and the beatles revolutinized music too but they were diferent in many ways. I like the beatles better though.

  • The Beatles are the best!!!!

  • Elvis inspired the Beatles especialy Jhon Lennon.

    You cant compare the Beatles to Elvis Presley who made every song sound great..Thats the difference because its a skill within itself. They needed Elvis to help writers make there songs into hits, Elvis was also very versatile and dynamic with hes music. Rock n Roll, Rythem n Blues, Gospel, Country, Spanish music, Flamenco, Pop, Jazz Swing e.t.c. The Beatles and Frank Sinatra's music all sounded the same after a while though they were great.

  • @TheMagneto187 It's John not Jhon

  • The Beatles <3

  • The beatles wrote songs and produced some very good tunes. Elvis is the greatest performer ever to walk on a stage. No one is in the same stratosphere as a vocalist and performer. As Springsteen said, there are many contenders and pretenders but there is only one King

  • Ask Paul McCartney even today who his favorite singer is and he will say Elvis. Just heard McCartney a few months ago say Elvis is the greatest singer ever

  • Before Elvis there was nothing - John Lennon

    If there hadn't been an Elvis there wouldn't of been the Beatles - John Lennon

    Anyone seen Nowhere boy? If you have you will know what I'm talking about, thankyou Elvis for being so influencual to make John Lennon Create the Beatles you both of you

  • Elvis had more talent in his little finger than those four put together

  • @MarkRogersTV do u know that i went on best 60s and 70s band they were beatles from top to the fith and then bob dylan then pink floyd and the elvis also the beatles had more hits and john lennons shit has more talent that that fat hobo and lets see him wright a song without saying babe babe babe babe baby baby 5000000000000000000000000000 times and if you dont know what im talking about look at his lyrics on youtube DUMBASS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @palmer8112 ur a real dumbass

  • Not a very fair representation of The Beatles since two of those songs were covers, and you only showed the very early days of their music!! Which is completely different from later on.

  • stop the argument both elvis and the beatles are good

  • Elvis Presley : Change the Music

    The Beatles : Change the World

  • Elvis would of been the greatest IF he'd written his own songs, but, he didn't write any so The Beatles are miles better imo.

  • So what if Elvis is the king of rock ? The Beatles are the GODS of rock. And not just gods, it's GODS with uppercase letters.

  • @KidzCount2 jaja,the beatles music wouldnt exist without elvis

  • @tazman868 yeah, but still The Beatles beat Elvis at his own game.

  • @KidzCount2 I don`t think so,Elvis changed the music,The Beatles just singed

  • @tazman868 actually, it's the other way around.

  • @KidzCount2 They call Elvis The King for something...

  • @tazman868 the beatles did heavy metal infact they made heavy metal and they made their own type of music they also did awesome rock lets see elvis make a song without him saying this babe babe babe babe 1000 times in a row dumbass

  • @KoombaBubble You have to insult me to do a comentary,how sad,but going to your comentary,he done does songs at the begining of his carrer,and by the way great songs,and with tose songs people loved him until his death and more,The Beatles with their songs only lasted 10 years,not evening until their deah.

  • @tazman868 r u fcking kidding me beatles music went on for ever and on radio till this day there is at least 1 usually 4 or 5 and elvis hmmmmmm let me think no now i know elvis is smart beatles are better elvis died on the toilate \

  • @MsChad365 elvis has his own radio station

  • @tazman868 so dose the beatles and listen to in my life and across the universe and the long and winding road and drive my car and somthing and while my guitar gently weeps and hey jude and hey bulldog

  • @MsChad365 are those songs that go on the radio or radio stations?

  • @tazman868 we should stop fighting over whos better cause there both good in their own ways believe it or not i have 3 elvis posters in my room and 4 beatles posters in my room elvis is very smart and a great performer but i just like the beatles a bit better but thats okay caus we now there both good and check out these beatle songs In my Life Across the Universe The Long And winding road and whatever elvis is good

  • @KoombaBubble it's ok for me

  • We couldn't make a comparsision. Elvis was a single, the Beatles a group. One trimped in the 50s the others in 60s...The Beatles were great, but they were 4 and Elvis only one. Lennon said that "Before Elvis there was nothing" and Ringo said "Elvis did everything". These are my opinion too...Elvis and Beatles are incredible...and Elvis was only one, there were not copys!

  • Elvis presley sucks balls The beatles invented the english rock elvis invented ummmmmm thinks of what he invented oh yeah he didnt invent and did you know he took country but then the beatles came then he took drugs and got fat then he sang the beatles songs like hey jude and somthing who ever dosnt like the beatles have only listen to yellow submarine

  • ELVIS- THE MOST COPIED VOICE IN MUSIC. THE MOST COPIED STYLE. CHANGED MUSIC AND CULTURE BY HIMSELF!! The Beatles- 4 pussies who became the most successful boy band ever.

  • listen up guys Elvis Presley Is nothing but a fat hobo he didnt make rock and roll he took country music dressed up like a freak and started to spaz out on stage but the beatles wow they r amazing like across the univers the long and winding road when u think of rock u dont think of that fat guy u think of Beatles when elvis was made they went crazy but then the smart john lennon and paul Mc Came up and kicked butt and george and ringo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • hey people it comes to one thing ONLY: elvis presley was only one person that changed rock music forever and the beatles were 4 people that continued the legacy of elvis

  • the beatles are ten billion times better

  • The Beatles were inspired by Elvis , so technically Elvis is better , since if it weren't for him the beatles wouldn't exist..

  • @Jigpikchu the bealtes mostly looked up to bob dylan & if it wasnt for the bealtes then the music we have today wont exsist & im pretty sure the beatles would exsist without elvis.. juss sayin

  • @Jigpikchu

    "since if it weren't for him the beatles wouldn't exist.."

    do you honestly believe that? if it wasn't for 1 artist they liked they would never have started?

  • @mancltymagics1 WHAT??!!! I am a lifelong STONES fan and I constantly hear "if it weren't for the beatles the stones wouldn't exist". Do YOU honestly believe THAT??!!! But when someone says that about Elvis and the beatles it's absurd?? It's sounds pretty stupid, doesn't it?

  • @straycatdevil wtf r u talking about heres elvis ((i think every girls pretty i love u baby baby i need u baby baby yeah yeah yeah then heres the beatles fans screaming over 9000 people cheering over millions of people watching beatles are the best without them there would not be a hole buch uf successful bands in england and america beatles 4 ever ((00)) -

  • @Pr2Glicher Ummm.....I want to hold your hand, love love me do you know i love you, she loves you yeah yeah yeah, please please me oh yeah. WTF is that???!!!!

  • @straycatdevil the beatles are legends look up across the univers and the long and winding road oh and by the way wtf

    is this ((i love u baby baby i need u baby baby yeah yeah yeah ummmmmmm could i have some more drugs)) the beatles did drugs to but still lennon is just amazingly smart smarter then that fatty elvis and once the beatles were made elvis started singing their songs thinking he would get more famous and the beatles is true english music

  • @Pr2Glicher Legends? bang bang maxwell silver hammer? yellow submarine? rocky racoon? John lennon smart? HE MARRIED YOKO ONO!!!!!! BTW, lennon worshipped presley. True english music- The Who, The Stones, The Kinks.

  • @straycatdevil i will tell u what it is talent and ur ugly just like ur mom

  • @Jigpikchu You have no idea. Just because they were inspired by Elvis how does that make Elvis "technically" better? The Beatles were inspired by many forms of music as was Elvis. Elvis was inspired by Dean Martin but does mean Martin is technically better? It's people like you who make Elvis into a joke.

  • ELVIS IS THE MOST SUCCESSFULL AND MOST INFLUENTIAL ARTIST OF ALL TIME.....he even SINGLE HANDEDLY REVOLUTIONIZED MUSIC & INFLUENCED THE BEATLES AND THE REST AFTER HIS WAKE.

    HE IS KING OF MUSIC AND SOLD OVER 2 BILLION RECORDS

  • @kingofkingz1979

    the beatles were more succesul than Elvis and Elvis didn't even write his own songs, elvis doesn't have 2billion record sales,

  • The KING sold 1.6 BILLION CERTIFIED (riaa & linked music organisations) & so did the Beatles

    In foriegn countries (without certification riaa or linked inc,) 40% (400 million) of elvis records were sold outside U.S as of 1997 the inflation of sales has more than doubled as of present

    Over 2.5 Billion

    Elvis 1st & most popular recorded artist WORLDWIDE

    Elvis is a MEGA SUPERSTAR, ONE MAN ARMY if the fab4 lost one man in band (lennon) they crumble & no more.

    Elvis created the beatles

    FACT

  • @kingofkingz1979 Paul Mccartney is actually the most successful man in Music.

  • @andyrangersoasis Paul has been performing live concerts for over 50 years (beatles, wings & solo) also making him commercially successful songwriter in the history of popular music.

    Elvis has been performing live concerts for only 12 YEARS, the KING 1st performed in 55 then was inducted to the army in beginning of 58 then had a 8 yr movie contract from 60-68, then come back to perform live from 69 till 78

    ELVIS still managed a bigger impact & sold more records than any other artist worldwide

  • @kingofkingz1979 wow your dumb dood beatles music is better much much better if your on my side thumbs up and elvis is nothing like beatles

  • @MsChad365 yup

  • @kingofkingz1979 you dont know tru music elvis is smart but not as smart as john lennon/legond

  • i mean john lennon

    

  • @andyrangersoasis no jon lennon is

  • sdgfsd

  • Michael Jackson.

  • Both Elvis and The Beatles went on Ed Sullivan, does it tell you anything that Elvis was given more money at a time when there were less TV owners? Another of many indications Elvis was a bigger hit, his music did better, as did his films, as did his tours, as did everything he ever attempted. Heartbreak Hotel (1956)-Suspicious Minds (1969) that's a span of releasing #1's longer than The Beatles even recorded. Elvis had almost as many Top 10's as The Beatles did top 40's.

  • @Steelersrock355 Elvis didnt make his music..so dont say ''elvi's music''. thats reason enough for him not being better than Beatles...and anyway Beatles are more succesful.

  • @msanm5 The Beatles were not more successful,, when u include everything Elvis sold from 1954- present (singles, LP, CD, cassettes, 8 track, etc) and do the same for the Beatles, Elvis outsold the Beatles by a huge margin. I like both, so I don't want to argue who is better, because that's a matter of opinion, but Elvis outsold the Beatles.

  • @msanm5 ELVIS RAPES BEATLES IN MUSIC,RECORD SALES, POPULARITY FAN BASE EVEN THE FAB 4 VISITED THEIR IDOL IN THE KINGZ CASTLE GRACELAND.

    THE BEATLES WERE GREAT BUT SANG LIKE LITTLE GIRLS AND WAS DOMINATED BY THE KING ELVIS

  • check on internet for the best selling artist of the last decade..their were 2nd behind Eminem. also the Best selling artist in history...you can see in how many countries they were #1, not only in USA and UK...look it for yourself. anyway, were talking about amount of people..not in how many diff places they sell albums. You're just a fanboy of Elvis...who didnt create music and was a male Britney spears.

  • @msanm5 shut tha fuc..... up! eminem is rabbish.. like your brain! eminem is not music, is mixed rabbish.. you dont dare to say that eminem was better than elvis or beatles, 2 great legends!ask any smart person, and you will get the result... eminem and others artists arent better than elvis,or beatls,or even michael jackson

  • @msanm5 Male Britney Spears lol? I wouldn't go that far, at least Elvis could sing. Britney can do nothing musically except sell sex. But I agree with what you're saying In order to be an artist, you have to write and compose your own music, which Elvis didn't do.

  • ESE QUE DIJO QUE ELVIS NO CAMBIO NADA POR FAVOR HASTA CAMBIO LA VIDA DE LOS BEATLES SIN ELVIS PAUL NO HUBIERA TOCADO LA GUITARRA O SU FENDER OSU HOFFNER O SU GIBSON ESTUDIA COMPA ELVIS CAMBIO EL RUMBO DE LA MUSICA POPULAR Y LA DENOMINO ROCK AND ROLL, CHECA A LOS BEATLES EN SU COMINZO PARECIAN 4 ELVIS PRESLEYS, JAJ, JA JA

  • ELVIS WAS NUMBER ONE ALBUM IN 2002

    NOBODY LIKED FREE AS ABIRD IN 1995 SORRY BATLEMANIACS

  • @gvaldesocampo The Beatles 1 album from 2000 outsold Elvis 30 # 1 hits by tens of millions. Elvis fans find this hard to except. I am a fan of both Elvis and the Beatles so I care only for the facts.

    

  • Anyone who thinks Elvis is better than The Beatles is either A. Old as fuck, B. A total dumbshit, C. A one-toothed redneck from Kentucky, D. Completely devoid of any musical appreciation, or E. Lisa Marie Presley. The Beatles kick EVERYONE'S ass, period.

  • Elvis by a long shot!

  • Top 40 hits

    Elvis-100+

    Beatles 56

  • @palmer8112 that's where you're wrong, being a better musician is how good you ply your instruments, how many instruments you play, the diversity of sounds, the innovation in lyrics...those are facts and the beatles are by FAR better. ALSO in success the beatles rapes Elvis...the beatles are the BEST SELLING ARTIST OF ALL TIME WITH MORE NUMBER 1 HITS THAN ELVIS. Beatles is voted 1 by almost all music source. I dont care about movies jajaja...how many of his hits elvis wrote?

  • @msanm5 Elvis was a more adult oriented musician than the Beatles, and kids are the music industry goldtrees, if you don´t trust me ask Spears or Justin Bieber.

    And the best musician is the one who makes the best music, no matter if he plays 1 or 1000s instruments, or if he can play every music in the world. Radios can play others peoples music just perfect, we need musicians for new good music.

  • @deapwavelio that's right..but to make beautiful music you need to know how to play instruments in order to compose. Elvis didnt make ANY music..as a musician he's as talented as britney spears. that's why Music sources and critics always say the Beatles are the greatest artist of all time. live with it.

  • @msanm5 But you know they arent the greates of all times, right?

  • @deapwavelio who says it? you? I guess you're alone my friend...critics, historians, artist and the majorioty of people are not with you. take care.

  • @msanm5 Ok fanboy.

  • @msanm5 They are not the best in Ingland. I bet more people listen today Led Zeppelin than The Beatles.

  • @deapwavelio that's one really dumb comment right there...Beatle is by far more popular than LZ..lots of people know the Beatles even if they dont even like them. Beatles is the 2do best selling artist of the last decade. that comment you made was really ignorant, I know if you said it to piss me off or you're really that clueless. :D

  • @msanm5 More popular but not the best. Today more people know Lady Gaga than the beatles and that means nothing. More musicians listen to Led Zeppelin than the Beatles, why? maybe because they did better music.

  • @deapwavelio you said ''I bet more people listen to LZ than Beatles''...the Beatles are more popular than LZ therefore people listen more to the Beatles, idiot. more musicins listen to LZ? again wrong...music sources all voted by artist and critics voted Beatlers as the greatest...everywhere you see you'll see Beatles at 1..never LZ at 1. ozzy osbourne, Brian May, CHARLES MANSON, david gilmour, Kurt Cobain and many more..they all have the Beatles as tehir favorite band. keep crying elvis noob.

  • @msanm5 Why are you so mad, looks like your in love with those guys. Some people know the Beatles and respect them but they are in the past right now, people listen more to the bands that came after them, like pink floyd, led zeppelin, acdc. Check on the internet and you´ll see more guitar lessons about how to play stairway to heaven than every beatle song together. More people playing Sweet Child of Mine than every beatle song together.

  • @deapwavelio It's kinda hard arguing with people that dont analyze...but I'm not mad tho. Beatles are the SECOND best selling artist of the last decade..even tho they quit in 1970...it wasnt PF or LZ. Beatles are more popular so in more parts of the world they're listening to the Beatles, very simple. get over the fact that the beatles are the greatest...you tried with Elvis and you lost..now you're trying with PF and LZ.:D

  • @msanm5 I agree that old people are the only one who continue to buy music. Young people download for free. I´ve had more Beatles albums than Led Zeppelin albums, I´ve never had an elvis CD in my life, but know that people today don´t listen to them as much as other 60s and 70s bands, people vote for them as the best because of the respect they deserve, just like Hendrix, he isn´t the best guitarrist of all time, but the respect he gets from people makes him the best on their heart.

  • @deapwavelio Elvis is voted for the respect he made, because he didnt make any music..he's a male Britney spears. Beatles made their music and is considered the best by the majority of people, music critics, music artists and historians. you can call it however you want. get over it. :D

  • @msanm5 They are consider the best by the majority of people who listen to The Beatles, cuz people who likes bachata, salsa, hihop, Flamenco, Reguetón don´t think they are. The majority of people don´t even listen to rock music. I´m sorry but Rolling Stones Magazine and some other sources you find out there don´t mean nothing. Historians are not waisting to much time on Rock music and Pop artist also.

  • @deapwavelio Beatles is the best selling artist of all time..also the 2nd best selling artist of the last decade..so if you analyze who's the most liked artists in history it's the Beatles...because of their consistency and Beatlemania. sure they are people that like other genres...but still they cant touch the Beatles on sales and consistency through time. :D

  • @msanm5 What was your source of information for knowing that? Remember that USA and Ingland is just a small part of the world. How much did Tego Calderon sold outsite the US or Juan Luis Guerra or some pop artists who only sales on China? Do you know how many people buy music in China thats only distributed there. Your just a fanboy, I know more people who listen to Sacaria Ferreira than the beatles. They are in the past. They used to be cool and not the best of their time.

  • @msanm5 That isn't true plenty of publication and music critique site Elvis as better. Deal with it.

  • @Steelersrock355 I'm not talking about fan polls..I'm talking about music sources...tell me wich music source voted elvis as the greatest. even TIME magazine voted the Beatles as the most influential artist of the century...elvis didnt make his music.

  • @msanm5 ELVIS GAVE THE BEATLES THE KEY AND THE WAY TO SUCCESS, WITHOUT ELVIS THERE WOULD HAVE NOT EXISTED THE BEATLES THAT IS WHAT PAUL SAID. BESIDES ELVIS HAD THE VOICE AND THE CHARISMA THAT NONE OF THEM HAD.

  • @gvaldesocampo Elvis didnt give any ''key'' or ''way to ''success''...elvis inspired the Beatles to be musicians...but as musicians the Beatles eat Elvis alive...because elvis didnt make his music..he's just a singer like Britney spears. understand the diff? :D

  • @msanm5

  • @palmer8112 Hi hairypalmer8112! You suck just as much as Elvis! Lol - The Beatles are #1

  • @palmer8112 you just said it...being a musicians and being an entertainer are 2 different things..you can have your own opinion of whos the better entertainer, but as musicians, beatles are better and you know it. noob

  • @palmer8112 it's not about how many hits u have ! but how many hits u WROTE or COMPOSED ,and the fact that elvis had no much talent Like lennon or even MJ IT ISN'T EVEN CLOSE

  • @palmer8112 u exaggerate about Elvis ,don't u ??? stop we know how he got his fama .

  • @palmer8112 elvis didnt make his music...he's a male britney spears...why britney and elvis sell? becuase of their charisma and physics. Beatles is best selling artist of all time with more number 1 hits than any other. they're always voted as the greatest by music sources. get over it noob.

  • @palmer8112 Yeah, the Beatles got 200 number 1, and Elvis only about 100

  • THE BEATLES ALL THE WAY

  • if there was no elvis the would be NO beatles thats says it all :) the beatles all wished they were elvis

  • @ssaannjjaay There would be Beatles, but they may not have been as great

  • After the Beatles came on the seen in the sixties, Elvis couldnt buy a gold record. He had one number one. Suspicious Minds and then faded away to Vegas. The Beatles should have wrote some songs for the man. McCartney has sold more than anyone. He is being gracious regarding the "hall of gold". Look at the end of the Beatles anthology. They felt sorry for him.

  • elvis no doubt.

    but the beatles are great, are some of the best bands

    but we consider that Elvis was one of the most important inspirations

    for the Beatles.

    elvis is the king of rock

    he wins

    no doubt ...

  • @The94Drost too bad artist and critics dont agree with you..they put beatles as the greatest of all time. why? because Beatles, unlike elvis, made their own music. simple as that. oh and also the beatles are the best selling artist of all time, not elvis. noob.

  • The Beatles are the clear winners!

  • elvis is 100% the BESTT, know one will ever be better then him, but the beatles are defoo second and are my fav band ever, know one should hate any of them and micheal jackson does not come close to any of these two he is shitttttt

  • @ssaannjjaay elvis didnt make his music. the beatles are considered the greatest by music sources and also the best selling. so you calling elvis the ''best'' it's just your opinion.

  • Elvis is clearly the winner because EVIS INSPIRED THE BEATLES!!!! If it wasnt for Elvis there wouldnt be any Beatles.

    The Beatles even said that Elvis was the best.

  • Comment removed

  • stupid title

    

  • Paul Mc Cartney said of Elvis:The Messhia has arrived

    Lennon said: No Elvis no Beatles

    Period.

  • nadie nunca va a superar a estos 4 Dioses del rock and roll y de la musica en general... ni siquiera el mal denominado "rey del rock and roll" ya que el no cambio la historia... no provoco la locura que provocaron los beatles en los años 60 y que aun siguen provocando.. su musica no morira jamas... the beatles por siempre la mejor banda de la historia

  • nadie supera la inigualable voz de john y de paul ni siquiera el rey ssssss the beatles 4ever

  • both

  • Okay Fuckoes,

    If not for Elvis Presley, the Beatles may not have come about

    So why don't we just enjoy the both because they are simply different, and both absolutely great.

  • the beatles win forever

  • Comment removed

  • Michael Jackson is better than both!

  • @MrDjoyahs MJ is a male Madonna and britney, where would he be without those musicians to make music for him? jajaja

  • @msanm5 What the hell are you talking about? he came out before they did you dumb fuck!

  • @MrDjoyahs read carefully what I said...then see who's the dumb one

  • @msanm5 He made his own music but not all of his songs were writen by him! If you want someone to understand you then type how you do in school!

  • @MrDjoyahs yeah he did some of his stuff...but not the majority..he was more of a performer than a musician

  • @MrDjoyahs" He made his own music but not all of his songs were writen by him"

    No, you mean non of his songs were written by him and he didn't make his own music, it was copied. Elvis was just a singer and entertainer, that's it. To even call him an artist is a joke, because you have to actually create something to be an artist and Elvis created nothing. He shouldn't even be in the same sentence as MJ, The Beatles or any other true artists who actually created their own music.

  • @TheFreeMentality Dude shut the fuck up! MJ can be in a sentence with anybody because he is the best! You're telling me bullshit right now! I will even put James Brown in the same sentence with Elvis if it is nessessary. James Brown is actually better. Mj was inspired by james brown but MJ is still the best music artist ever

  • @MrDjoyahs Oh my God! How dare I diss Elvis "the King". Call the police, no call the fire department, no call the FBI, no call the President. You having to resort to telling me to "shut the fuck up" already shows I got under your skin, you already lost. What I stated was a fact, MJ wrote and composed most of his own music and invented his own style. Elvis did nothing but sing words of other songwriters. Therefore, he shouldn't be mentioned with anyone who created their own music. Deal with it.