The answer to what killed the dinosaurs is obvious....... Q: Where do we find the remains of all of the dinosaurs? A: In water deposited sedimentary rocks along with all of the other fossils around the world. Noah's flood destroyed them all around 4400 years ago. Meteors may have caused the "fountains of the great deep" to open up. Genesis 7:11
The really convincing part of the iridium layer in Mexico is that is was found in stratigraphical units correlating to 65.5 Ma years old. This layer is found worldwide in the same age units. There for it is highly excepted that this was resulted from a large impact with threw tons of material into the atmosphere and carried this element on a global scale. I think a lot of work on the chixulub crater was done in Italy at one point :O...
The Permain extintion was caused in part by the Serbia lava flows pushing up world tempture. I haven't heard of anyone mentioning higher levers of uridiam in the Boundary beteewn Permain layers and Trassic layers. (Please excuse my poor spelling). It still seems to me that the higher levels of uridiam mus have come from the KT impact (I did see below your theroy on it being part of the earth getting blown up then back down but I cant see how the ueidiam comes to be there in such large quinties)
The iridium comes from the massive expolsion of a meteor impact. Large volcanic eruptions can produce iridium. And the layer they found is from a meteor. It's just that that meteor originally came from earth.
i agree there was an asteroid. but i'm not the only one contesting that it killed off the dinosaurs. many scientists believe it was lava fields in India that were responsible. the asteroid that hit the earth was a piece of the earth's crust that fell back to earth after the fact, after a mega eruption.
Interesting theory, the problems I think you need to address are as follow:
The last major volcanic activity in the Hudson Bay area dates to around 600 million years, almost a factor of 10 off in relation the the K/T Extinction
The next problem is to explain how you force more water into the 'pocket' that is building this pressure, simple physics would prevent it, the area wasn't 1000's of meters of ocean to provide the kind of pressure that would be required to do what you theorize.
dear eighteen, in fact your are correct about pressure, i realized this problem and revised hypothesis. and regarding activity after 600mya, the eruption was so large almost no material was left behind. however there is an anchient shoreline dating around 436 mya. the shoreline is exactly where the arch travels through churchill Manitoba
There's a process called subduction which has been examined in areas like Oregon & Washington - it's about the formation of magma caused by the immediate vaporization of ocean water. That water being instantly transformed to steam (heated to temperatures of 1300°C or 2372°F) simply melts the rock around it into more magma ... there is no explosion.
the difference between subduction and a hot spot is that a hot spot has a trapped pocket of gas. when magma from a underwater volcano vents into the ocean, the heat is realeased immediately. in a hot spot, the steam is trapped in a pocket increasing pressures and heat until an overload and an eruption. Mt.
St. Helens erupted because the vent in the top of the mountain became blocked and built up pressure and erupted with staggering results.
I understand the differences between this and your model, but I think your model provides a very rare unique example (not unimaginable - just uncommon). Even Mount St. Helens does not fit your model, because this was a large buildup which took months - and it was high temperature pressurized rock that exploded. As I recall, the "introduction of water" was theorized to possibly help prevent that exlosion, but the area was too enormous.
the Mid Atlantic Ridge and other underwater volcanoes are not covered by a land mass. the land mass acts as a plug in the vent. this allows a pocket to form. the chamber has a space at the top where gases collect, the uplift then allows water into the gas chamber. underwater volcanoes are not blocked and vent straight up and out into the water. there is no air pockets or if any, they are small. also the weight of a deep ocean keeps the crust pushing down forcing gas up and out...
Also, this theory doesn't really make much sense to me - there have been <b>numerous</b> underwater eruptions over the years - how do you think hawaii was formed? ;) Not once in known history did these underwater eruptions result in a nuclear explosion, and that's not just a little water, they was completely submerged eruptions! So, how does this theory make any sense? Maybe I missed something...?
I agree with rad - you should redo these videos and have someone hold large "cue card" posters with all the information on them to read directly behind the camera so it'll at least look like you're looking into the camera. Also the pauses and reading errors almost made me completely lose interest.
i agree with rad and yourself. i apologize for my production and my reading skills. if i had my choice, i wouldn't have my ugly puss on You Tube discussing a controversial theory. i would rather have someone else present this if i could. i will explain my reason for releasing my information on You Tube and the reason behind my poor production. judge me on the content and not the presentation
I like these videos. They are really interesting. I learned a whole lot about Super-Volcanic Eruptions thanks to your videos. This is a very interesting theory.
You need to learn how to read better. Try going over the script a couple times so you can read with a flow instead of pauses. I like your theory and it makes sense.
This has been flagged as spam show
The answer to what killed the dinosaurs is obvious....... Q: Where do we find the remains of all of the dinosaurs? A: In water deposited sedimentary rocks along with all of the other fossils around the world. Noah's flood destroyed them all around 4400 years ago. Meteors may have caused the "fountains of the great deep" to open up. Genesis 7:11
johnthreesixteen316 8 months ago
The really convincing part of the iridium layer in Mexico is that is was found in stratigraphical units correlating to 65.5 Ma years old. This layer is found worldwide in the same age units. There for it is highly excepted that this was resulted from a large impact with threw tons of material into the atmosphere and carried this element on a global scale. I think a lot of work on the chixulub crater was done in Italy at one point :O...
danosurfs 1 year ago
it looks like a red mushroom! XD
MrMalecko 1 year ago
The Permain extintion was caused in part by the Serbia lava flows pushing up world tempture. I haven't heard of anyone mentioning higher levers of uridiam in the Boundary beteewn Permain layers and Trassic layers. (Please excuse my poor spelling). It still seems to me that the higher levels of uridiam mus have come from the KT impact (I did see below your theroy on it being part of the earth getting blown up then back down but I cant see how the ueidiam comes to be there in such large quinties)
thepunictrader 2 years ago
The iridium comes from the massive expolsion of a meteor impact. Large volcanic eruptions can produce iridium. And the layer they found is from a meteor. It's just that that meteor originally came from earth.
robinUC 2 years ago
Ok, now I'm too scared to go to Yellowstone (and die). I think I will go around the equator somewhere. Wish I would have learned Spanish!
jfreesprt 2 years ago
Do you have any degrees or anything of that nature?
saturdaysavior 3 years ago
WHAT KILLED THE DINOSAURS ??
the KT comet - 65 mill years ago...
do u not know about the KT boundary ?? and the tonnes of overwhelming proof ???
dejayreal 3 years ago
i agree there was an asteroid. but i'm not the only one contesting that it killed off the dinosaurs. many scientists believe it was lava fields in India that were responsible. the asteroid that hit the earth was a piece of the earth's crust that fell back to earth after the fact, after a mega eruption.
robinUC 3 years ago
I bet he did, It would be kinda hard (for me at least) to remember all that crap! good vids so far.. going on to number 4..
solidsnake2112 3 years ago
did u read this off of a card or something like that?
tak895623 4 years ago
no he reads it off a playing card ,, lie pokman or some thng . hjahahaha
genmaster119 3 years ago
Interesting theory, the problems I think you need to address are as follow:
The last major volcanic activity in the Hudson Bay area dates to around 600 million years, almost a factor of 10 off in relation the the K/T Extinction
(cont)
eighteendelta 4 years ago
The next problem is to explain how you force more water into the 'pocket' that is building this pressure, simple physics would prevent it, the area wasn't 1000's of meters of ocean to provide the kind of pressure that would be required to do what you theorize.
In any case good luck with your ideas.
eighteendelta 4 years ago
dear eighteen, in fact your are correct about pressure, i realized this problem and revised hypothesis. and regarding activity after 600mya, the eruption was so large almost no material was left behind. however there is an anchient shoreline dating around 436 mya. the shoreline is exactly where the arch travels through churchill Manitoba
robinUC 4 years ago
There's a process called subduction which has been examined in areas like Oregon & Washington - it's about the formation of magma caused by the immediate vaporization of ocean water. That water being instantly transformed to steam (heated to temperatures of 1300°C or 2372°F) simply melts the rock around it into more magma ... there is no explosion.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
the difference between subduction and a hot spot is that a hot spot has a trapped pocket of gas. when magma from a underwater volcano vents into the ocean, the heat is realeased immediately. in a hot spot, the steam is trapped in a pocket increasing pressures and heat until an overload and an eruption. Mt.
St. Helens erupted because the vent in the top of the mountain became blocked and built up pressure and erupted with staggering results.
robinUC 4 years ago
I understand the differences between this and your model, but I think your model provides a very rare unique example (not unimaginable - just uncommon). Even Mount St. Helens does not fit your model, because this was a large buildup which took months - and it was high temperature pressurized rock that exploded. As I recall, the "introduction of water" was theorized to possibly help prevent that exlosion, but the area was too enormous.
j0eg0d 4 years ago
the Mid Atlantic Ridge and other underwater volcanoes are not covered by a land mass. the land mass acts as a plug in the vent. this allows a pocket to form. the chamber has a space at the top where gases collect, the uplift then allows water into the gas chamber. underwater volcanoes are not blocked and vent straight up and out into the water. there is no air pockets or if any, they are small. also the weight of a deep ocean keeps the crust pushing down forcing gas up and out...
robinUC 4 years ago
Also, this theory doesn't really make much sense to me - there have been <b>numerous</b> underwater eruptions over the years - how do you think hawaii was formed? ;) Not once in known history did these underwater eruptions result in a nuclear explosion, and that's not just a little water, they was completely submerged eruptions! So, how does this theory make any sense? Maybe I missed something...?
siciliano29 4 years ago
I agree with rad - you should redo these videos and have someone hold large "cue card" posters with all the information on them to read directly behind the camera so it'll at least look like you're looking into the camera. Also the pauses and reading errors almost made me completely lose interest.
siciliano29 4 years ago
i agree with rad and yourself. i apologize for my production and my reading skills. if i had my choice, i wouldn't have my ugly puss on You Tube discussing a controversial theory. i would rather have someone else present this if i could. i will explain my reason for releasing my information on You Tube and the reason behind my poor production. judge me on the content and not the presentation
robinUC 4 years ago
I like that you shaved between parts two and three.
vergeofchaos 4 years ago
I like these videos. They are really interesting. I learned a whole lot about Super-Volcanic Eruptions thanks to your videos. This is a very interesting theory.
Fsturka 4 years ago
You need to learn how to read better. Try going over the script a couple times so you can read with a flow instead of pauses. I like your theory and it makes sense.
radlations 5 years ago
are you a geologist?
robinUC 5 years ago
Sounds like he's a botanist ;)
vergeofchaos 4 years ago