Added: 4 years ago
From: geekhappens
Views: 45,627
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (95)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Glasses weren't invented until fairly recently evolutionarily speaking, and a geek wouldn't be anywhere near a pnumatic drill, this fails.

  • huh...a basic evolution video, same premise as all the others, but its wearing glasses. durrhurr

  • very nice

  • o i get it. natural selection used to work by everyone killing the guy born wearing glasses

  • this is not amusing whatsoever

  • thumbs up if you got here from looking at the monkey with ak-47....

  • America only lose to Turkey in number of people that dont belive in evolution. You are always tring to fuse religion and nacionalism (dangerous combination), Prefering to travel insede your own borders than get to know other cultures and points of views, Great part of the population prefer to remain ignorant. I ask myself if this is the reason you people are always in wars.

  • @mirandaalf I dont disagree with that statement at all but theres a time and place for everything and this video really is not the place for that kind of debate.

  • haha this is cute. :)

  • It's not exactly the true evolution of the man.

    1) the glasses does not exist before we exist !

    2) during the period of dinosaurs, there had almost no mammals on the planet, just a sort of animal that is similarly to mouse, but, i don't see it at your animation, because you did not show it.

    But I like this video anyway.

  • @TheLeon96Ahuel They also didn't showed the most advanced specimen of the geek: you

  • @TheLeon96Ahuel Oh for crying out loud! This is a video made for fun, do you really think he was serious when he made this?! If you are so stupid that you do, then you shouldn't try to lecture people.

  • @cocacolaligification sorry, but, I'm not stupid, I liked the video, I know that this video was made​for fun. but, I wrote this text before I become less rigid. before, I was too rigid and I observed that it was not perfect. but now I give a damn if it's not perfect. It's funny anyway. lol

  • @TheLeon96Ahuel Son, you're evolving!

  • @jerrygreg2 yeah, lol

  • Umm, so at what point were Geeks rednecks?

  • geek here... my glasses aren't that thick!

  • myn are

  • this made me lol

  • Comment removed

  • ?????????? and than big bang happend.

    hahaha

  • hehehehe.....why it does not hapen for every human like frog???????

    simply ....it is not right......use your minds guys

  • are u denying evolution?

  • evolution is a religion disguised as science

  • no its not, it dosnt have a prophet, and it dosnt have a god [it disprooves god]. also this time they have PROOF, not ppl saying i had a dream about a dude saying we should do this

  • are you for real?

    what proof do you have, id like you to present it to me

  • lots mate, trust, there are even videos, search human evolution made easy, and research all the things it says. now show me ur proof, show met heres a god idiot.....

  • utube vids dont prove man evolved...lol

    -variations, adaptation of species in order to exist-yes.

    no proof EVER of one species becoming another

    i ask for proof/fact..

    after you give me evidence of that i will show you proof of God(even though you could just simply look out the window as proof, or have proof that man evolved is proof He doesnt exist)

    as far as the bible, its states all nations in the Middle East coming against Israel, all have except TURKEY, which in DID fulfilling the prophesy

  • no, i said check it out and research it, which u clearly didnt do, do it.

    ok ill give a example, colds and flu's always mutate so our body cant get rid of it. we used to be apes, and now we are humans.

    we used to own israel, but stupid britian invaded it and fucked everything up there

  • ive seen all the vids, studies,books,seminars etc etc etc

    colds and flu adapt to survive

    its not proof that we were once apes...none

    -still not proof provided

  • there is, skulls found in africa, LOTS. u cant ignore that.

  • 1. look at africans,pigmies,bush people and differ assorts of human in the world.......skulls are going to differ

    and the fact there are the major gaps of apes to humans

    if it was so there would be millions of these skull/skeletons

    lucy-most all agree was a chimp

    heidelberg man-built from a jawbone

    nebraska man-built up by one tooth(later found to be a pigs)

    piltdown-jawbone(later found to be a modern ape)

    peking man(500,000yrs old, but evidence disappeared

  • the gaps are being filled, its been prooven, why deny it?? proove that the garden of eden existed, how did things survive? for example, in a nylon factory there was nylon eating fungi, that was discovered in the trash [were there was tons of nylon] but that mutated in order to survive, was there any nylon in the garden of eden?NO. they evolved, new type of fungi, disprooving ur creationist ideas

  • gaps, huge gaps....no signs of anything evolving into apes, they just seemed to appear

    4 of 7 of the apes to humans are proven false yet remain in high school text books to keep the chain alive, or evolution theory would die

    a new type of fungi evolved plasmids in bacteria are a designed feature intended to allow bacteria to adapt easily to new food sources or cope with toxic chemicals, no a new species, hardly disproves creationism

  • the skulls were dated to a long time ago, also u cannot find modern human skulls that date toprevious types of humans. pgments are different, like the chineese have yellow skin due to lack of sunlight and their eyes are like that due to the wind[and possibly for better eye sight]. africans are black because they get lots of sunlight.

  • all types of "so called" dating are on the constant for dismissals for inaccuracies

  • Nonsense. Nowhere close to the extremes you are suggesting. If you believe the earth is less than millions of years old, you are delusional. In reality, it is billions.

  • it hard to prove if only 0.1 of dead material is preserved....you can prove evolution easy the flu it adapt to antibodies so the one that survive reproduce and infect others that more of natural selection but still close.

  • biology continues to "show" how our existences COULD of happened yet no evidence of a cell changing into anything but itself(things can ADAPT to survive and there are varieties in species)but there is no proof of one thing changing into another), never

  • yeah it has when a species become isolated it a certain area i say within a say a couple Hundred yeah that will be a new species.....and a great example is the galapagos and the rain forest....but i think it best for people to have religion and i think it good for humanity to know about evolution. some people criticism evolution and say we came ape is stupid.

  • never heard of a species becoming something else other than itself.....do you have examples

    -respect your civil approach to conversation

  • Wrong.

    Oenothera lamarckiana changed to Oenothera gigas. The formation of the Zea mays and Mimulus guttatus species. Failed breeding between variants of Nereis acuminata. To name but a few.

  • @BW

    Oenethera lamarckiana is an old, invalid synonym for the plant species Oenothera glazioviana . The Oenothera that botanists cultivated did not form their own self-perpetuating populations, but rather required constant special care and consistently generating a range of chromosome sets (diploid, triploid, tetraploid, etc.) in their offspring. The idea that these plants constituted an example of speciation is wrong, and this was realized more than 7 decades ago. 1940's.

  • Are you sure that its an invalid synonym? Oenethera lamarckiana is written on many websites as an accepted name. But anyway, thats inconsequential.

    Nevertheless, speciation did occur. Admittedly, its one of the worse examples I listed. I'm still waiting for you to refute the others.

  • @BW

    As science advances and more gaps become 'subject to explanation', the role of God diminishes. The natural drives out the need for the supernatural. There are plenty of arguments against an old earth.

    Receding Moon, Granite formations(polonium halos), no history prior to 4,000-5,500 B.C.,

    just to name a few! lol, delusional?Unless you were there can it be fact.

  • The receding moon argument is nonsense. Lambeck's study of the variable rotation of earth combined with Hansen's further work showed how the earth-moon system is fully compatible with a 4.5 billion year old earth.

    For polonium halos, radon formed during the radioactive decay of uranium flows through neighbouring rocks as it is inert and then decays into polonium.

    What you posted is pseudo-science. The real science points in only one direction - the existence of an old earth.

  • Funny I can come back with counters, but.....

    rather agree to disagree!

    Nice debating.

    Kinda pointless to go back and forth, for Im sure we both have plenty to argue/counter with no outcome but wasted time.

    -respect

  • Hmmm, ok. Its a shame that you disagree with fact though. Nice debating.

  • 2. neanderthal man(thought to be an old man with arthritis)

    new guinea man(tribal man of the bush-australia)

    cromagnon man

    modern man

  • also extending on what i said about modern skulls been not able to be dated to around 150,000 and beyond [ i believe....] it prooves we invovled, we changed, and the more skulls they connect from simmilarities, the more the gaps are being filled, and the dates keep going back to 6,000,000 years and probaly more, and those skulls were APE. I believe also u dont think the earth was here for that long anyways.

  • not trying to argue, im justing looking for truths

    if you like i can send you the plot of lyell( a geologist and friend of darwins plot to invent a history without a God involved)really funny how his lies of the age of the earth, got the idea of evolution going, and how science started to wrap itself around the belief of one man(not even a real scientist)

  • we didnt come from apes.

  • some people do

  • Yeah, we came from a common ancestor of apes and humans. Half-ape half-man, so to speak.

  • why do people find that so hard to believe. our DNA is almost identical matches. People think were saying they came from monkey.

  • stiff animation... but it expresses its point well enough.

  • not all geeks have glasses!

  • we did not came from fish and dinosours we just a simple ape man like tarzan but not so much cause his mother and father died iam just 11 years ld :)

  • i wonder what the life of a monkey geek was like...

  • even though we r all sitting here at our computers :P

  • HAHAHA SOOOO TRUE... WITH ANYONE

  • that was pretty bad, as much as i hate the word "geek", he was only one at the end.

  • im a player...suk it geeks

  • i dont remember nerds having a six pack or abs

    :S

  • iM a geek

  • he has glasses from a tadpole lol

  • WE DONT LIVE IN A POKEMON WORLD!!!

  • lol, yes of course evolution does not happen like in pokemon

  • put your back straight!

  • lame

  • ǝןoɥ ʇıɥs

  • Very nice video !

  • because christianity, the basis of creationism, says nothing about evolution, therefore your theory is wrong. Like my science teacher said, two opposite groups can't both be right.

  • He made a Joke

  • reply to zortak44, what the fuck u on about foo, creationism is a load of ass, even the pope accepts evolution as fact, and that was a funny vid anyway it wasnt meant to be taken seriosly, i dont think u hav ur head screwed on right

  • oh my god....are we really going to start an evolution debate on THIS of all videos?? go somewhere else and bicker...

  • Ha ha ha! Funny that cartoons can have such responses. I like it! It gives it an extra touch of reality satire.

  • @EndCatProductions

    some people just have to be right, the video is awesome, regardless of anyone's view point.

  • YOUTUBE/YAHOO NEW WORLD ORDER!!

  • Glasses alone does not a geek make.

  • pretty obvious ur not one looking at ur grammer =P

  • You're right.

    It should have been "Glasses alone DO not a geek make."

    Sorry about that.

  • Hmmmmm. That didnt really have much geekiness in it. It would have been better if each stage was doing something geeky, instead of just the last one.

  • why did he not have clothes on in the farmer stage but had a rake... epic fail!

  • that was made with garage band music for mac, right? i could tell by the sounds

  • So thats how I evolved.

  • hahaha

    It's funny as the Evolution Theory isn't ?

  • you mean that scientific theory supported by all the evidence and is reconfirmed by the 4 species we gene map every week on average?

    yah, funny.

    i'm guessing your rather ignorant of what the theory is if you think it's funny instead of staggering in it's predictions, it's evidence, and it's implications.

  • lol so funny i need to get those sprites used in the vid

  • Sure. I can send them to you if you still need them ;) They are under creative commons license.

  • i understood every thing you said....Part from the (creative commons license) part

  • ahahahha

    = )))))))))))))))) DUUDEE = )))))))

  • lol, it should have been called 'the natural history of geeks' hehe

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more