sorry that i don't find words in english. sometimes you can't translate some things without loosing the sense of what you want to say (hope you understand me.. even my english is difficult to understand!! o.O)
ich glaube, bezaubernd ist der richtige Ausdruck für das, was sie da macht. sie singt bezaubernd, sie sieht aus wie frisch aus einem märchen entsprungen (s. bezaubernd), und die ganze athmosphäre in ihren songs ist einfach... magisch. :)
i think this is a good cover of the song, not a great one, but a good one.
anyway, i read the debate about covering and i think:
music is art and art wouldn't be art if it wasn't open to interpretations. a song - no matter who wrote it in the first place - can and should be covered if another artist feels like there might be something to add - mostly there is. art needs to evolve and develop so that it'll last.
and a cover is art, too cause it can take as much creativity as writing an original
PLEASE DO NOT READ THIS YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED DIS DONT STOP THIS SO SCARY. xSEND THIS TO OVER 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS.
I'm a HUGE Beatles lover, but seroiusly, her main concern when covering something so awesome was probably that people would compare hers to the original. she's allowed to cover the beatles.
I actually don't like the Beatles, but usually when people redo their songs, I like them. It's not so much their songs I don't like as...them. They put so little emotion into their songs when there was so much potential to put it there. Especially early on when they were pretty much bobbleheads.
i agree, i like her cover too, but are you seriously going to say that the Beatles didn't put any EMOTION into their music? um, everything they wrote about had to do with their beliefs and the current state of the world. they were trying to change things and cause a revolution, and in the 60's and 70's, probably no one was more passionate about that than them. if you actually LISTEN to their music, you'll hear the emotion.
I have listened to their music. Most of my friends are Beatles fans (and they, like you, are pretty much aghast that I don't like the Beatles). I think their lyrics are passionate. They have a lot of potential, which is why I generally like covers/remakes. But the way they sang them was either in a bobblehead-emotionless way or in a strung-out-on-drugs way. In my opinion. I realize it's not a popular one.
I firmly disagree with your opinion of the Beatles, but I suppose I'm biased. I do, however, understand your position - Bob Dylan songs are great when they're covered (I like Dylan, but I'd rather hear other people sing his songs).
agreed...Like a Rolling Stone covered by Jimi Hendrix was amazing and personally thought it was better than the original...maybe hendrix is just too good
the people are so fucking rude!!! LISTEN TO SARA! your gonna be mad that you didn't when she becomes famouse and u were so rude to her! ge a fucking life!
ya, my brother (8 years old)bught ike a kids mix thing cd. and this song is on there and i laugh every time they say I get high with a little help frm my friends. its funny, then i (14 years old) tell him its just means that you get happy and far with friends. but that is the riginal lyrics.
Check your facts. The Beatles released this song in 1967 in the Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band album. Joe Cocker covered the song in the '70's.
I needed to check MY facts better. The Beatles did write (Lennon/McCartney) and record (performed by Ringo Starr) the song in 1967 and release it on the Sgt. Pepper album, as I wrote before. However, Joe Cocker's cover (yes, it was a cover) was done in 1968. He also performed it in 1969 at Woodstock.
The audience is so rude! I'd be fucking honoured to be there. Sara is amazing.
ageiiGIRL 2 months ago
How can people be so disrespectful towards a great an amazing singer like Sara ??
MrPIIPES 3 months ago
YOUR SUPPOSED TO SING THIS SONG LIKE THIS --> :DDD !
gennylanee 4 months ago
The crowd is so rude. :/
deschanel7013 5 months ago
2 ppl have no friends!!
GangstaBaby696969 5 months ago
you go girl singing Beatles BEAST!!!!!! Paul, John, George, and Ringo would be proud!
Garyinspired95 11 months ago
Hey audience.... SHUT UP!!!
fightinleeroyjenkins 1 year ago 6
still one of my fav singers ... GREAT cover!
forestgroveful 1 year ago
ah she didnt want to sing "i get high with a little help from my friends" lol
gustavorockshaha 2 years ago
@gustavorockshaha she did say it.....at the end.
hootieti 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dont like it so much, but at least its not as bad as the damn joe crocker version
JimmyBshaw 2 years ago
You should probably listen to the version he sang at Woodstock. Quite possibly the best Beatles cover to date.
Roq235 2 years ago
:) thank you, ill look into it :)
JimmyBshaw 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I love how the audience is louder then her.. I'd probably go to the bathroom at this part.. actually, I'd probably leave at this part.
nebaberic 2 years ago
great voice, pretty nice cover! cool!
JeanMelisson 2 years ago 4
es muy muy bien! me encanta sara bareilles :)))))))
proyectoquijotesco 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
So so cover, crowd noise was louder than her in spots
729Drew 2 years ago
yay! sara and the beatles; a perfect combo!!
ElphieandMaureen 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
thanks your so nice ....
not !
NailuvinJonasbros 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
SHES SOOO FAKE !!! SHE MIMMING !! RIGHT THERE !! at 2:40
NailuvinJonasbros 2 years ago
your high....
hootieti 2 years ago
@NailuvinJonasbros That's the video....the audio and visual are out of sync....
carr0760 1 year ago
AH! I wish she would record this for real.
samurai1200 2 years ago
It's not physically possible for Sara to sound bad. Lol.
GardeMangerLove 3 years ago 40
@GardeMangerLove uh yeah it is
Laurney552277 1 year ago
@Laurney552277 She is Perfection!
Jwalter421 7 months ago
This could even be better than the Orginal! 2 of my best singers! Beatles and sara! barailles!
a+++++++
Lfcguy4077 3 years ago 5
Nice cover, powerfull voice. I like it.
Urbainken 3 years ago
what a joy to hear her cover this song! makes me happy =D thanks for uploading!
anabass 3 years ago 3
sorry that i don't find words in english. sometimes you can't translate some things without loosing the sense of what you want to say (hope you understand me.. even my english is difficult to understand!! o.O)
ich glaube, bezaubernd ist der richtige Ausdruck für das, was sie da macht. sie singt bezaubernd, sie sieht aus wie frisch aus einem märchen entsprungen (s. bezaubernd), und die ganze athmosphäre in ihren songs ist einfach... magisch. :)
Mathehasser4ever 3 years ago
i luv this song and sara
lleexxyymm 3 years ago
Sara + the Beatles(especiially a little help) = magic
Candypirate11 3 years ago 7
sara bareilles is so hot. love her.
askysoblue 3 years ago 8
my 2 faverite things beatles and sara bareilles!!
lovea97 3 years ago 3
好きです。
mx4430 3 years ago
she sounds amazing, as usual.
and this is live!
pure talent, i love her.
xthlittlemermaidx 3 years ago
i think this is a good cover of the song, not a great one, but a good one.
anyway, i read the debate about covering and i think:
music is art and art wouldn't be art if it wasn't open to interpretations. a song - no matter who wrote it in the first place - can and should be covered if another artist feels like there might be something to add - mostly there is. art needs to evolve and develop so that it'll last.
and a cover is art, too cause it can take as much creativity as writing an original
pianoforte1984 3 years ago 7
I guess the audience didn't want to sing along. Haha.
JB1052 3 years ago
No, they're absolutely right. The beatles did make this amazing
jimemarsden 3 years ago
Of course, the Beatles made this AMAZING.
but I love Sara Barelllies.
LKSimsVideo 3 years ago
very, very, very, very good!
gustavojapiassu 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DO NOT READ THIS YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED DIS DONT STOP THIS SO SCARY. xSEND THIS TO OVER 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS.
sk84o4 3 years ago
Haha, last year a few boys sang this for school in the musiclessons, that was really funny, but this cover is great!
Iertjuh27 3 years ago
She is, by far, the best singer w/out editing.
cutiepie6465 3 years ago 3
I think this was fantastic! but,it was kind of rude when people just talk and not listen!
SaraBareilles1 3 years ago 40
Yes. It was!
JillixxAnn 3 years ago 3
@SaraBareilles1 That's one reason why the beatles stopped doing concerts
ARISZAB 6 months ago
@SaraBareilles1 yeah if I was there I would def not be talking
CassiRaye1 2 weeks ago
I'm a HUGE Beatles lover, but seroiusly, her main concern when covering something so awesome was probably that people would compare hers to the original. she's allowed to cover the beatles.
supersexysix 3 years ago 9
ahaha i love the random people that just yell out the "whoo!"s and "YEAH"s during random parts of the song in the beginning
but this is really an amazing Beatles cover, she adds a new dimension to this song, which was already amazing when the Beatles sang it!
frootloops116 3 years ago 3
I actually don't like the Beatles, but usually when people redo their songs, I like them. It's not so much their songs I don't like as...them. They put so little emotion into their songs when there was so much potential to put it there. Especially early on when they were pretty much bobbleheads.
I like Sara's cover a lot though.
Everme91 3 years ago
i agree, i like her cover too, but are you seriously going to say that the Beatles didn't put any EMOTION into their music? um, everything they wrote about had to do with their beliefs and the current state of the world. they were trying to change things and cause a revolution, and in the 60's and 70's, probably no one was more passionate about that than them. if you actually LISTEN to their music, you'll hear the emotion.
mosesishot19 3 years ago 6
I have listened to their music. Most of my friends are Beatles fans (and they, like you, are pretty much aghast that I don't like the Beatles). I think their lyrics are passionate. They have a lot of potential, which is why I generally like covers/remakes. But the way they sang them was either in a bobblehead-emotionless way or in a strung-out-on-drugs way. In my opinion. I realize it's not a popular one.
Everme91 3 years ago 3
I firmly disagree with your opinion of the Beatles, but I suppose I'm biased. I do, however, understand your position - Bob Dylan songs are great when they're covered (I like Dylan, but I'd rather hear other people sing his songs).
andrewalderman 3 years ago
agreed...Like a Rolling Stone covered by Jimi Hendrix was amazing and personally thought it was better than the original...maybe hendrix is just too good
urwaiter 3 years ago
The Beatles had a lot of potential but didn't put enough emotion into their music?
Have you just landed from Planet Mars?
bleo34 3 years ago 2
She's just paying respect to the Beatles by singing a great cover.
KittyCatOHara 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
she cant reven sing the beatles nobody can theyre better then all the singers and bands
emo561998 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck her nobody can copy the beatles
emo561998 3 years ago
why should that stop her from trying?
purplelephants99 3 years ago 9
the people are so fucking rude!!! LISTEN TO SARA! your gonna be mad that you didn't when she becomes famouse and u were so rude to her! ge a fucking life!
SaraBareilles1 3 years ago 5
good cover but noone can ever top the beatles
MinnieMouse077 3 years ago 3
This is one of the best covers of a Beatles song that I have ever heard.
camperchik163 3 years ago 2
She's definately cuter than Paul McCartney
smikebain 3 years ago 7
Great cover !!!
randy739 3 years ago
love you Sara!
SaraBareilles1 3 years ago
I love it!:)
saublebeachchick 3 years ago
I love the Beatles but she doesn't do the best cover but shes a great singer
hersheyskisses9 3 years ago
i love this song.i love the beatles.but i think i like it better when she sings it
kkproductions0 3 years ago
Nobody can ever beat ringo when singing this song.
cogwell 3 years ago
i liked it... nothing can beat the beatles but it was still good.
missyboogie 3 years ago 2
Does she slip and say "I get high with a little help from my friends?"
craigb12 4 years ago
those are the original lyrics :)
beetlebuggin 4 years ago 6
yup...and what fabulous lyrics they are... :)
spazzumgurl 3 years ago
ya, my brother (8 years old)bught ike a kids mix thing cd. and this song is on there and i laugh every time they say I get high with a little help frm my friends. its funny, then i (14 years old) tell him its just means that you get happy and far with friends. but that is the riginal lyrics.
MishaShemyakin 4 years ago 2
Dude...Its the beatles.
mistersister18 4 years ago
really LOVE this song, her version, and the Beatles! Does Ringo sing this song when the Beatles do it?
nolista42 4 years ago
yaaay!!! a Beatles song! she does such a good job singing it too! Sara Bareilles is a great singer!
whiteWolf535 4 years ago
she is really good! i love the beatles but this is very well done.
watdhekk 4 years ago
excellent!
mariainesmvs 4 years ago
SHE'S GREAT.
paudabove 4 years ago
I love Sara Bareilles but I can't stand people covering Beatles lol. They're my babies.
But her voice is good anyway.
muckaru 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
can't stand people covering the Beatles? That's kind of ironic seeing as how the particular song is a Joe Cocker song covered by the Beatles.
It's okay though :) and I do love her voice and all her work.
Great video
Raeinar 4 years ago
Um ok. I think this is meant to be a cover of The Beatles' version. I never said I can't stand Beatles covering other people.
Lucky me it's ok with you...
muckaru 4 years ago
Raeinar,
Check your facts. The Beatles released this song in 1967 in the Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band album. Joe Cocker covered the song in the '70's.
nolista42 4 years ago
Raeinar,
I needed to check MY facts better. The Beatles did write (Lennon/McCartney) and record (performed by Ringo Starr) the song in 1967 and release it on the Sgt. Pepper album, as I wrote before. However, Joe Cocker's cover (yes, it was a cover) was done in 1968. He also performed it in 1969 at Woodstock.
nolista42 4 years ago
Just to let you know... Joe Cocker did a cover version of this song not the other way around. This was a lennon and mcCartney song.
jpablohayes 4 years ago 3
Cocker covered The Beatles, ok?.
Savak22 3 years ago
This is great, thanks again.
StephGway 5 years ago 2