Your machine will never work, I am sorry. Look up "dumb weights" versions of a GIT (Gyroscopic Inertial Thruster). My friend David Eugene Cowlishaw proved long ago that a device such as yours will never gain linear thrust. The conversion of angular (rotational) acceleration and decleration into linear accleration is much harder than you think. In my opinion, if his machine does in fact work, the laws of physics will need to be rewritten. The concept that "space" is an "empty vacuum" may be wrong
@cougarrcsnva - in the video 'Nikola Tesla unlimited free energy forever THEY dont want you to know about' - watch?v=XMhAIdqH0Cs - at 30:30 minutes the principle for this design is shown and it seems to be working fine driving a canoe through a swimming pool. There are certainly more designs possible.
@OmetaOne I have seen the video before. This is known as a "slip-stick" or "plank climber" effect. Only a pendulum test would suffice, a water test is inadequate. Believe me, I was in your type of mindset for years, as well as Dr. Marsden was. It's a blind alley. Look closely at Dr. Marsden's tethered test from the side view. You will notice it looks like a Yin Yang. This is not a coincidence. The sinusoidal wave is the only way you can create "Mass Displacement" as he terms it.
Why is the canoe test inadequate? The effect is shown, the thing is moving - it actually IS moving, this is good enough for me and most people! Improve that crude little engine to run at 1000 rpm or more and it will race the canoe through the water. Speed it up even more and see if it can negate its own weight or lift up.
If you build one, explain it and make it beneficial for society and market it I fear it may be taken away from you. I am sure 'they' have it already anyway and weaponized it.
@OmetaOne The most important aspect of his design is the 90 degree angles. The coriolis effect is created while his machine spins. It basically recreates the motion of light on a macroscopic level. Mac Quan stands for the "macroscopic version of the inner quantum workings of matter". The implications of his device are far reaching. His MQ2 has 2 G's of acceleration. This thing would leave the solar system in less than a week. Gravity is not a "pull", it is a "push".
@Iesoustwist I have already read them all. I know the current theories. They may be misguided. People try to explain gravity as some anomalous "bending" of "space-time". People think that gravitational lensing is proof of this. Gravity may actually be a "flow". We may not be "pulled" down by gravity, we may be "pushed" down by it. The mathematics are the opposite but work out the exact same. Look up Einstein's statement about "relativistic Aether". Space may be the most dense thing
I am in direct talks with Dr. Marsden, and I believe he is in fact telling the truth that his MQ1 did work and produced more than 32 pounds of thrust. He is supposedly now building the MQ2 to launch into space. I am attempting to reproduce the MQ1 myself with what limited information he gave me and should be able to do some tests next year. I must say, you are WAY OFF. Your machine has absolutely nothing to do with Dr. Marsden's MQ1. It is not as simple as you think you are perceiving it.
@cougarrcsnva - looking forward to see your device and I believe Mr. Marsden is telling the truth. This design may have nothing in common with Mr. Marsden's.
I want to direct you to the videos that show the working model of Mr. Marsden that is shown in this video. Delete the spaces: w w w . adriangrey . com/pages/QTMacQuan . html
You are saying that this engine negates the effect of mass, but is not anti-gravity?And you are also saying that it provides a levity or 'lofting' effect?
Is this the result of harnessed centrifugal forces?
@UFOGEAR - I would not say that it negates mass, like the rotor of a helicopter does not negate the mass of the helikopter, it just lifts it. But it uses mass on an unbalanced centrifugal path to produce a unidirectional push with each revolution.
at 01:07 You inserted a short video: "MQ-1 Final Flight Test"
Please, can you post more of "that" ?
Your design is similar to this: a49d5cJOGQ0 (search that keyword here on YouTube ; Watch all the videos from that kilianotmarkeil profile)
Like you, Kilianotmarkeil , is moving the mass over an Omega curly path but in his case the gain from the centrifugal force m*v*v/R is transfered to the main rotor.
I think his device can be unbalanced in order to generate unidirectional thrust
I think we will have to ask a Russian astronaut to take a centrifugal-thruster-toy (bellow 1Kg) likes this on the International Space Station and to film it.
when the outer part moves one side as its mechanically coupled it'll have a pull towards center. let it be any no. of gears put in. if any of the mechanical contact is with the earth's surface, it'll have a pull effect be in direction opposite to that of the applied force direction. eg if we try to push the earth by legs we leave the surface of earth and if we sit on chair and push our body forward without touching ground, we will see the chair skidding. I am making every part required in it.c u
You must be dreaming. It is way simpler than that. We are all trying to figure it out, but defenetly no one can claim doing it succesfully yet. I think the rotation is created by magnets spiraling arround a torus shaped pipe containig mercury. The speed and the "DNA style" rotation of the liquid metal inside is a clue! Worth trying mabe?? I am sorry I have no workshop to experiment with it.
Yes, I've been dreaming I was a son of a brahmin 10,000 yrs ago.
My point is that the mercury is not on a circular path but this heart-like path which creates a certain imbalance in one direction that can be used to move something, a car, a plane, just anything. Mercury is mainly used because it is the heaviest liquid.
@santimaui - Mr. Mike Marsden from USCB, Texas can claim that he demonstrated successfully what his engine, the MAC-QUAN 1, is capable of. And its purely mechanical. This video is only an attempt to explain what Mr. Marsden did.
@santimaui : But we did. About 15 years ago. Try this: put a Labris shaped stator (wolfram core) in the middle. Imagine if the mercury was rotating (as u state), how it would flow over the labris ('+') and what the effect would be on saturated (with current) Mercury. Vortexes indeed. Induction on induction on induction on ......
just have a look that at all the points in your design it is having equal and opposite reaction to restrain it direction directly opposite to its resultant vector.
Thanx worldsacrap - but I have not presented a design for a craft yet, only a design for a propulsion-system. Maybe you can reveal some of your knowledge for mantric and tantric means of aerodynamics...
Can anyone direct me to any MQ1 or 2 vids please.
chrisdale74 2 weeks ago
@chrisdale74 - adriangreyDOTcom/pages/QTMacQuanDOThtml
And on Google Video as well:
video.googleDOTcoDOTuk/videoplay?docid=770563497668406528#
video.googleDOTcoDOTuk/videoplay?docid=3769084330238501981#
OmetaOne 2 weeks ago
Your machine will never work, I am sorry. Look up "dumb weights" versions of a GIT (Gyroscopic Inertial Thruster). My friend David Eugene Cowlishaw proved long ago that a device such as yours will never gain linear thrust. The conversion of angular (rotational) acceleration and decleration into linear accleration is much harder than you think. In my opinion, if his machine does in fact work, the laws of physics will need to be rewritten. The concept that "space" is an "empty vacuum" may be wrong
cougarrcsnva 2 months ago
@cougarrcsnva - in the video 'Nikola Tesla unlimited free energy forever THEY dont want you to know about' - watch?v=XMhAIdqH0Cs - at 30:30 minutes the principle for this design is shown and it seems to be working fine driving a canoe through a swimming pool. There are certainly more designs possible.
OmetaOne 2 months ago
@OmetaOne I have seen the video before. This is known as a "slip-stick" or "plank climber" effect. Only a pendulum test would suffice, a water test is inadequate. Believe me, I was in your type of mindset for years, as well as Dr. Marsden was. It's a blind alley. Look closely at Dr. Marsden's tethered test from the side view. You will notice it looks like a Yin Yang. This is not a coincidence. The sinusoidal wave is the only way you can create "Mass Displacement" as he terms it.
cougarrcsnva 2 months ago
Why is the canoe test inadequate? The effect is shown, the thing is moving - it actually IS moving, this is good enough for me and most people! Improve that crude little engine to run at 1000 rpm or more and it will race the canoe through the water. Speed it up even more and see if it can negate its own weight or lift up.
If you build one, explain it and make it beneficial for society and market it I fear it may be taken away from you. I am sure 'they' have it already anyway and weaponized it.
OmetaOne 2 months ago
@OmetaOne The most important aspect of his design is the 90 degree angles. The coriolis effect is created while his machine spins. It basically recreates the motion of light on a macroscopic level. Mac Quan stands for the "macroscopic version of the inner quantum workings of matter". The implications of his device are far reaching. His MQ2 has 2 G's of acceleration. This thing would leave the solar system in less than a week. Gravity is not a "pull", it is a "push".
cougarrcsnva 2 months ago
@cougarrcsnva Space is not an empty vacuum, get newer books.
Iesoustwist 2 months ago
@Iesoustwist I have already read them all. I know the current theories. They may be misguided. People try to explain gravity as some anomalous "bending" of "space-time". People think that gravitational lensing is proof of this. Gravity may actually be a "flow". We may not be "pulled" down by gravity, we may be "pushed" down by it. The mathematics are the opposite but work out the exact same. Look up Einstein's statement about "relativistic Aether". Space may be the most dense thing
cougarrcsnva 2 months ago
I am in direct talks with Dr. Marsden, and I believe he is in fact telling the truth that his MQ1 did work and produced more than 32 pounds of thrust. He is supposedly now building the MQ2 to launch into space. I am attempting to reproduce the MQ1 myself with what limited information he gave me and should be able to do some tests next year. I must say, you are WAY OFF. Your machine has absolutely nothing to do with Dr. Marsden's MQ1. It is not as simple as you think you are perceiving it.
cougarrcsnva 2 months ago
@cougarrcsnva - looking forward to see your device and I believe Mr. Marsden is telling the truth. This design may have nothing in common with Mr. Marsden's.
OmetaOne 2 months ago
The heavier the weight the faster it moves? sound a bit like "Nibbler" poop, lol
racefan32 2 months ago
I want to direct you to the videos that show the working model of Mr. Marsden that is shown in this video. Delete the spaces: w w w . adriangrey . com/pages/QTMacQuan . html
OmetaOne 3 months ago
DEAR VIEWERS,
FOR ASTONISHING FACTS, JUST TYPE ON THE SEARCHING BOX:
Quran and Science
SEVEN PARTS! YOU MUST LIKE THEM!
gulfland 4 months ago
@19702609ful hanabu 1
hellzone100 5 months ago
the video was impressive is there any more and who made that video of that thing levitating
stevenchiverton48 6 months ago
oh my god i see the resemblance in the heart shaped path!
Saulandbass 7 months ago
You are saying that this engine negates the effect of mass, but is not anti-gravity?And you are also saying that it provides a levity or 'lofting' effect?
Is this the result of harnessed centrifugal forces?
UFOGEAR 1 year ago
@UFOGEAR - I would not say that it negates mass, like the rotor of a helicopter does not negate the mass of the helikopter, it just lifts it. But it uses mass on an unbalanced centrifugal path to produce a unidirectional push with each revolution.
OmetaOne 1 year ago
at 01:07 You inserted a short video: "MQ-1 Final Flight Test"
Please, can you post more of "that" ?
Your design is similar to this: a49d5cJOGQ0 (search that keyword here on YouTube ; Watch all the videos from that kilianotmarkeil profile)
Like you, Kilianotmarkeil , is moving the mass over an Omega curly path but in his case the gain from the centrifugal force m*v*v/R is transfered to the main rotor.
I think his device can be unbalanced in order to generate unidirectional thrust
eliberatus 1 year ago
@eliberatus - exactly, Mr Wuerth has only arranged the weights in a balanced fashion to demonstrate a different effect.
OmetaOne 1 year ago
@OmetaOne
I think we will have to ask a Russian astronaut to take a centrifugal-thruster-toy (bellow 1Kg) likes this on the International Space Station and to film it.
These will settle the dispute forever... :)
eliberatus 1 year ago
when the outer part moves one side as its mechanically coupled it'll have a pull towards center. let it be any no. of gears put in. if any of the mechanical contact is with the earth's surface, it'll have a pull effect be in direction opposite to that of the applied force direction. eg if we try to push the earth by legs we leave the surface of earth and if we sit on chair and push our body forward without touching ground, we will see the chair skidding. I am making every part required in it.c u
raja030in 1 year ago
@raja030in
You want to build it?
OmetaOne 1 year ago
@OmetaOne
Yes I want to build it
But world should remember its use will be dangerous than nuclear technology if built and used.
raja030in 5 months ago
You must be dreaming. It is way simpler than that. We are all trying to figure it out, but defenetly no one can claim doing it succesfully yet. I think the rotation is created by magnets spiraling arround a torus shaped pipe containig mercury. The speed and the "DNA style" rotation of the liquid metal inside is a clue! Worth trying mabe?? I am sorry I have no workshop to experiment with it.
santimaui 1 year ago
@santimaui
Yes, I've been dreaming I was a son of a brahmin 10,000 yrs ago.
My point is that the mercury is not on a circular path but this heart-like path which creates a certain imbalance in one direction that can be used to move something, a car, a plane, just anything. Mercury is mainly used because it is the heaviest liquid.
tuberkeler 1 year ago
@santimaui - Mr. Mike Marsden from USCB, Texas can claim that he demonstrated successfully what his engine, the MAC-QUAN 1, is capable of. And its purely mechanical. This video is only an attempt to explain what Mr. Marsden did.
OmetaOne 1 year ago
@santimaui : But we did. About 15 years ago. Try this: put a Labris shaped stator (wolfram core) in the middle. Imagine if the mercury was rotating (as u state), how it would flow over the labris ('+') and what the effect would be on saturated (with current) Mercury. Vortexes indeed. Induction on induction on induction on ......
Aeneas911 11 months ago
@santimaui :) Well sounds good. Similar to a particle accelerator right?
santimaui 10 months ago
just have a look that at all the points in your design it is having equal and opposite reaction to restrain it direction directly opposite to its resultant vector.
just little more effort need friend.
raja030in 1 year ago
@raja030in What do you mean by equal and opposite reaction of what to restrain what?
If you know what you are talking about you could express it understandable.
In any case, I have seen it working.
OmetaOne 1 year ago
very good thinkin man......
ive done research on this nd can say that u have presented a good design though it lacks some mantric nd tantric means of aerodynamics....
well done....
worldsacrap 1 year ago
Thanx worldsacrap - but I have not presented a design for a craft yet, only a design for a propulsion-system. Maybe you can reveal some of your knowledge for mantric and tantric means of aerodynamics...
OmetaOne 1 year ago