We landed on the moon not once but six times. That is one hell of a conspiracy eh? 24 different astronauts. You deniers are just plain insane in the brain. * Apollo 11 landed 20 July 1969 * Apollo 12 landed 19 November 1969 * Apollo 14 landed 5 February 1971 * Apollo 15 landed 30 July 1971 * Apollo 16 landed 20 April 1972 * Apollo 17 landed 11 December 1972
As far as anything left or placed on the surface of the moon, all could have been done by unmanned spacecraft or probes flying over the moon and dropping it to the surface. Even by a roving probe dropped to the surface and then driven off into a crater or to the darkside.
When NASA admitted several years ago that all plans no longer exsisted for all Apollo missions, that's when flags went up for many people. They said it was all destroyed because they had no room to store it????!!!! Huh?
Watch the documentary "astronauts gone wild" available on YouTube to see the true nature of the clowns and criminals who participated in the Apollo moon scam.Their personalities and their behaviour is as good as a direct confession of their crimes.
@markly90 Did you actually study any of the mountains of real evidence that supports the moon landings,or did you just watch a utube hoax vid? 1000s of experts in geology,physics,engineering,radiology,astronomy etc have studied the Apollo data,film and samples.NASA brought back 400+ KG of moon rock.It has been analysed by geologists worldwide,including russia and China.If it was a hoax,why didn`t the USSR expose it as fake? Why would they allow their hated rivals to claim a "fake" landing ?
All of you who keep saying "ofcause we landed on the Moon some people just wanna say that they faked it"
Just look at the video and what they say about they had problems just getting Off the Ground and ask yourself why they havnt been there since then its over 30 years if they knew how to get on the Moon As they Said they was Then you should expect that they would have done it again and again to build that base on the moon As they wished for but after what i know they never tryed again hmmm don
@markly90 Why the hell would we want to go to the moon again? What's so special there? We can send all the damn probes we want. We know more about the moon than we do the oceans, and its not changing
It is obvious that we did DEFINITELY go to the moon. You can tell when Sir. Armstrong the 2nd speaks that his voice is very 'spacey' and quite 'moony' - for those of you that have experience weightlessness like myself, like when you are found in a Y hole cruncked off your kebabas, you would understand and see exactly what the moon landing was all about. AMERICANISM. I for one would not offend myself with associated with the haters. "Too infinity and beyond" as Aldrin said as he reached space.
Well is it not clear for all with a brain to see? Surely no one truely believes that the US went to the moon!? It is so obvious, secret documents that were leaked privately prove catagorically that the US and the USSR shared information to enable man to go to the moon to recover "mysterious foreign artefacts". It was not US space men that were in Apollo, it was an international team that went. The signals are clear, what was shown on TV was fake, but man did go to the moon.
The flag waving in the "breeze" is actually proof that they were in a vacuum. When he was jamming the flag in see how he twisted it? That set it in motion. There is no atmosphere, no air. That means there is little friction to slow down the flag. Therefore the flag would be moving for a helluva lot longer then it normally would. Perform that same stunt in a vacuum chamber and see for yourself. When Bill Kaysing pointed out the flag he shot his own theory in the foot.
so tell me the moon landing was basically a giant f u to the soviet union yet they didn't call it fake im sure they had hundreds if not thousands of scientists studying the footage what makes you youtube degree retards think you know better
@jimmyjimjim4567 The Soviets never said they believe the Americans went to the moon, NEVER... American propaganda did. The Soviets have been hiding their little secret space program for decades and no one knew. If they could do that, then why can't we keep our people quiet? It's a HOAX and people believe the shit is true. Who will believe a handful of people over hundreds? That is why they don't talk, because they don't have a chance unless they can show proof without dying, make sense, right?
@GUARDIANtrooper god you are such the stereotypical tin foil hat person omg if i talk the government going to kill me. Why are you so sure its a hoak you do know the physics required to land on the moon is well understood and was implemented. perhaps if you knew even a little bit of rocket science you would see that it was perfectly feasible.
@jimmyjimjim4567 And you are riding that pig with your adjectives of lame ass suggestions, stick to the topic. What the fuck is a hoak, a new conspiracy maybe?
Have you been to the moon to check their claims or do you just take their word for it like any other fool of your like? Of course you never been to the moon, so don't be too sure of your bullshit antics. I seek the truth and I speak against bullshit and those who orchestrate and support this lie. America is better than this bullshit...
@GUARDIANtrooper you know what im not even going to bother continuing this shit you fucking nutjobs piss me off so much if the majority of the human race was like you were would we be the stone age thats where. Any advancement you would cry fake or say it cant be done lets just accept we cant do anything. I hope you dont have kids the last thing we need is more people who are just happy to sit idle and not work to better mankind.
@jimmyjimjim4567 I am for technology fool and you are for bullshit, that is a very big difference. Yeah FUCK OFF, I don't give a fuck... You want to make a stupid ass comment in the comment section and think you won't get attack, think again. If this bullshit HOAX was to self destruct, you idiots would still believe we went to the moon. How do I know that, because I asked and they answered correctly. THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END...
YES, we did not land on the moon, lol! And, we can't land on the moon by holding on to that lie that we did... We first have to make a contraption that could even travel that distance with the proper amount of trust to even make it that far and back. Then we have to figure out how to get pass our life support system, the VAN ALLEN belts. We need to undo Nixon's lies and start over. Work with other countries to achieve even greater challenges to venture beyond our expectations. Earth Exploration.
NASA claims 27 of its people went to the Moon well back in the technological antiquity in the middle of the last century.According to the claim 3 people each time in 9 missions.Each mission lasted about 10 days so the total of human present in outer space(allegedly)was about 90 days.All of these people were trained in photography and they had a total of about 60 still photo and video cameras with unlimited film.But guess what.Not one of the the 32,000 images they returned containing any stars
@4FunPlayin I do not buy this story, it is nonsense. But this clip (and the documentary) is pure fun. You can see, how easy it is, to manipulate simple minded people. The creators are clever to get money from their followers.
@CHSarahBs Sarah, how is this nonsense when it is exploring the facts of what the people involved are saying that it was or could be a hoax? These people are professionals and they were right there. They are the few that have the courage to speak out. Bill Kaysing worked for the company that designed the Apollo rockets at that time. He concluded that they had too many problems to make it to the moon, but the mission was flawless? Nixon was a liar and got impeached, that doesn't arouse suspicion?
@GUARDIANtrooper Bart Sibrel is not a professional scientist. He is a filmmaker, and not a good one. Kaysing was not a scientist, he had a degree in English. Yes, he worked for Rocketdyne, but he had no scientific background. See his questions about the flag, the missing crater, the missing stars etc. Questions which are answered very easy by using basic scientific knowledge. Kaysing was clever in one single field: To sell his book (cont.)
@CHSarahBs So are you a scientist? You don't have to be a scientist to experiment. A degree is just a piece of paper that gives you respect of that study. A filmmaker would be perfect for a hoax like this. He could pinpoint any inconsistencies that would suggest a hoax or fakery, he's a filmmaker, it's what he does... If you worked around rockets and have all knowledge of them, in the armed forces, AND..., been following this hoax since then, why aren't you an eligible candidate for this?
@GUARDIANtrooper No, I am not a scientist. Sibrel and his companions pretend to be scientists and made false statements, claims and conclusion, which have been debunked by real scientists. The most of the hoax accusations can be debunked by logic and with a bit of common sense and basic science. If there were one acknowledged expert/scientists, stating that Apollo was a hoax, I would change my mind. But unitl now no expert in photography, radiation, aerospace, aeronautics, astronomy, geology...
@CHSarahBs They didn't claim to be scientist they just give their assessment in their field as it was expressed in this video. Their positions are acceptable, excluding those who believe in this hoax. This alone gives gas to any hoax that people that do believe will even contest this at such magnitudes. Why support this lie and continue fight against concrete evidence? Threats make it impossible for scientist and astronauts to speak out, their lives and careers are on the line, would you talk?
@GUARDIANtrooper Their positions would be acceptable, if they did not lie. Sibrel and Percy i.e. pretend to be experts. There is no single evidence for a hoax and no proof for threats.
@CHSarahBs How do you prove a threat? And if there is absolutely any evidence of a hoax, then why are we debating? Why is anyone debating? Why is our $300,000 amateur science program grounded by government trolls, because we ventured beyond the exosphere? Why did they threaten our future if we try to go to the press about it? Our prototype could probably at least make it to the Van Allen belts just to see if it is possible to do so... They don't want that, because that would answer questions...
@GUARDIANtrooper Is there anything available online about this project that could "probably reach the VA belts"? I`m not mocking,I am genuinely interested.
@GUARDIANtrooper The main problem with your statement is, with all respect to your point of view, that there is no shred of evidence for a moon hoax. All the claims can be easily explained with a bit of scientific knowlidge, common sense and logic. I can only speak for myself. I am debating here, because there are some people believing this nonsense, spread by Sibrel, Kaysing etc and follow this blindly because it is against the common opinion. (cont.)
@CHSarahBs If there is no evidence, then why are we debating, why is this issue debatable? This HOAX is not based on a few people in which you and your likes referred to as NUTS. Kaysing has giving his assessment from his point of knowledge with the experience that he applied to it, to be acceptable by all excluding his adversaries, namely you and all that believe in the moon landings. People were following the moon landings blindly for over 40 years and now alternative media is changing that...
@GUARDIANtrooper It is not a question of believing. A scientific acknowledged fact is prooved by experts and scientists. Apollo is an acknowledged fact. Proofs for it are available in scientific peer-reviewed articles, reports, datas etc. All the evidences which Kaysing brought up are debunked. Kaysing was not really a liar, he had not enough knowledge about the subject. I could say the same about the hoax believers, following blindly the stuff which is told to them by these alternative medias.
@CHSarahBs You think scientists and experts are automatic proof that a HOAX is not evident. I guess you think that nether one of these individuals has never lied in their lives. And, if you are not an expert, you don't have the sense or common sense to declare fact or fiction, lies or truth, wrong or right, real or fake? You are pretty much calling people dumb and stupid, because they don't have a degree and they don't have a voice. Therefore a HOAX is not feasible, right? It works both ways...
@GUARDIANtrooper As I said, experts and scientists publish their work (including their proofs) in PEER-REVIEWED papers, so their results can be backed up by others. This is how science works. And in this very transparent way Apollo has been examined and acknowledged as a historic fact.
I call people dumb, when they are following blindly an exposed liar for the only reason, that his statement is against the government/USA/Jews/mainstream or something like that.
@CHSarahBs Everything is corrupted pertaining to this moon HOAX, it's a HOAX... If a president is found guilty of a crime, why can't a group of individuals be manipulated into a hoax for their agenda. That is not proof, it's corporation to insure a career spot in the name of a lie. It's simply going along with the course. My teacher is part of it and every time someone tries to contest it, it is over ruled, how could anyone voice an opposing opinion on anything? Is the government totally honest?
@GUARDIANtrooper I would call it a hoax, if there was one shred of evidence, not only unsubstained claims without any scientific basis. The main problem for hoax believers is, that the landings are acknowledged as a historic fact and that the burden of proof is on their side. I can not see a political reason for a moon hoax (Kennedys project but finished in the Nixon era), but I am swiss and do not bother with US-politics.
@CHSarahBs But Sarah, where is the proof? I haven't found any proof of a moon landing, it looks totally fabricated and when you dig deeper, it is evident that it is totally fabricated, therefore it is conclusive that it is a HOAX. By you saying that you don't bother with America's political system, you are excluding yourself from the debate, because this is politics Sarah. You said it yourself, this was Kennedy's project and was finished by Nixon, right? You can't get more political than that...
@GUARDIANtrooper The proof is in the scientific papers from scientists round the world, from independant scientist either, who are not involved in NASA.
It should be interesting, which details are looking fabricated. You have to remember, that it was a very strange environment, not to compare with the environment on Earth.
I am not excluding myself by pointing out the scientific results. I want to ask you a question about logic (next post)
@GUARDIANtrooper The issue is not debatable, because it is an acknowledged fact. But there are some people, who can not accept scientific findings and results, so they have to make up their own stuff. Most of it is without any scientific basis. Some of it are simple (and mostly silly) lies. Other things are misinterpretations and misunderstandings. This is debatable.
@CHSarahBs If that is true Sarah, then why are you here fighting for the truth? Leave these idiots to their ignorant opinions, right? If they don't want to accept it, then I guess your job is to force feed them into a deeper quarrel that leads back to square one like we did. Oh yeah, you are a cutie by the way, lol! But you must understand Sarah, most people that debate these issues to the opposition don't believe, because of common sense. The whole ordeal just seems too impossible...
@GUARDIANtrooper Can you tell me the logic, why Nixon should fake a project, which was started by his hatred enemy Kennedy? The success will be ever belong to Kennedy, not to Nixon. For me it would be more logic to let it go. If there is a possibility for a failure, it would be better for Nixon.
@CHSarahBs Kennedy was assassinated, remember? WIth all due respect, Kennedy believed that we could go to the moon, but Nixon found out it was impossible. Therefore, "IF YOU CAN'T MAKE IT, FAKE IT." Probably another reason why Kennedy was assassinated, he would go along with the HOAX, lol! I really don't believe that, but I wouldn't put it pass our government to kill for those reasons. You can't trust people that hide too many things, you must be up to no good, do you not agree?
@GUARDIANtrooper I do not agree. I only see speculations and no bit of logic. Kennedy was the inventor of Apollo. Assassinated or not, Nixon was his political enemy and hated the whole Kennedy Clan. I can not see any logic, that Nixon would faked Apollo to give Kennedy a posthum credibility and honor. Nixon would say "Let them go and fail" to reach a PR success for his administration.
@CHSarahBs Nixon was a puppet, he only did what the puppeteers ask, which is why he didn't get impeached. Politicians aren't enemies, Kennedy was and he got killed for not playing along. Look at Barack, Clinton and McCain. They were enemies in the worst way in the election, but now, they work together is perfect harmony? Our country is corrupted Sarah and so is yours. Kennedy didn't launch the mission, he died. Going to the moon was to defeat the Russians and the Russians are still trying...
@GUARDIANtrooper I am not fighting for the truth. I correct obvious mistakes and try to direct the people to the right direction. I comment obvious lies and misinformation. As I have said before, these things are debatable.
Cutie? Hm, I hope this was a compliment ;) If yes, thank you.
@CHSarahBs Ok, if you are in the business of correcting the obvious mistakes, what degrees do you have to go along with your analyses? It works both ways Sarah, right? The ones that are the so-called misinformers believe without a shadow of a doubt that this moon landing is a HOAX, according to their expertise along side your opinions and your likes. I believe it was a HOAX and you don't. Your opinion, my opinion, with giving evidence from both sizes. And now China has confirmed it deeper...
@GUARDIANtrooper Their expertises are definitively wrong. This has been analysed by experts. Sibrel was wrong and lied. Percy was wrong and made a step backwards in saying, that the moonlandings happened, but the footage was faked. Allen was wrong and lied, Groves was wrong and lied. It is all examined. My opinion does not change the fact, that those people have lied and/or were wrong.
@CHSarahBs They are experts and it is easy to have someone working with the apposing side to say the other side is wrong, how is that proof that they are wrong? NASA lied, but you still believe them on this issue. No, he said the moon landings may have been real, but the pictures and videos were faked. Why would these guys lie about this, what is the reason to lie about this if it was real? It doesn't make sense to lie on NASA other than... But NASA, I see every reason to lie, think about it...
@GUARDIANtrooper Seeing their examinations I can only say, they do not act like experts. Take Percys statement, that he had examined all Apollo images. This is not true, otherwise he would know, that there are many photos which are not perfect, which are simply out of focus, overexposed etc. Groves examination is also questionable and not expert-like. An expert would have taken the same camera with the same equipment. So they are simply liars.
@CHSarahBs That's just it, they aren't acting, it is real life and being honest, unlike the ones accused. If NASA put out photos that are questionable, the answer would be skepticism, that's not too hard to figure out. What is not exert-like? Is it expert-like to put out photos that are questionable to arouse suspicion and skepticism? It works both ways and the so-called experts make mistakes too, but not more stupidly like the perpetrators that are being accused, they started the fire...
@GUARDIANtrooper Remembering the style of examination (Groves used a very different camera and exposed it to a higher radiation level; Allen investigated a photomontage in a book, not the original photo; Sibrel compares Shuttles and Apollo followed by obvious lies about the availability of footage and photos; and it is going on this style) I can clearly say, that this documentary and all the others are bullshit. Each claim has been answered directly, the most of them 40 years ago.
@CHSarahBs NASA made a book with colored pictures and you could see that they manipulated the photos big time. You can see double images in the same vicinity of others, knowing that conspiracy theorists will point this out, why do this? Pointing out mistakes isn't lying, it is more expressive to make a point. If NASA lied about anything it is all debatable and tagged a HOAX. NASA lies are conclusive and the number of people viewing THIS video that agree surpasses your claims of bullshit...
@GUARDIANtrooper Asking things you do not understand is absolutely ok. But you are not willing to accept answers which do not fit to your worldview.
This 10 years old Fox documentary is a sad example for biased and (in first place) bad journalism. This documentary exposed Sibrel as a simple liar who has no idea about making a complete research, who compares apples with bananas and is making stuff up. He has no idea about rocketry, radiation and other important fields.
@CHSarahBs If this documentary is sad then why waste your time with it, its been 10 years right? Youtube is about 6 years old and it is an enemy to all government bullshit and people are waking up, FINALLY. I know the moon landing is a HOAX, not just, because of the things I see on here, but personal experiences. I don't see Sibrel as a liar, but a HERO, to challenge our government. You have to fight fire with fire. I really don't know all the details your homeland, but USA, it is pretty bad...
@GUARDIANtrooper Man,you guys.Who do you think owns youtube? Answer= google.One of the multi billion dollar companies that rule the capitalist world.I sometimes think conspiracy theorists believe they own youtube.If you lived in the tyranny you believe,why would google allow you to post this stuff? Why does Sibrel,a taxi driver,know more about Apollo than scientists,geologists,engineers and astronomers who`ve studied the Apollo data? Many of these experts are from countries unfriendly to the US
@swfcocs1 We own google, it can't run itself, we built it up. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, because the truth is no theory, but a man who lets someone take his freedom away for security is a fool. They are afraid of us, UNITY is power idiot, that is why we fight to drive them back, the internet is a new world now. You don't have to know more about science to see a fucking HOAX, a con, a crook, a liar, a manipulator, a killer, a thief, etc. It doesn't matter what country, common sense works.
@GUARDIANtrooper I`m an idiot yet you think "we" own google? It`s a multi billion dollar company owned by shareholders and executives who get paid dividends not "us"."they" aren`t remotely scared of "you" as all you truthers ever do is moan endlessly online .What have you actually done about this "tyranny".In the 1930`s,when people died fighting actual tyranny,it was said that people who did nothing about fascist tyranny were complicit in that tyranny.I ask again,what have you actually done?
"Common sense" is the first newb cliche of hoax dorks who dont have any. Any idiot who screams "HOAX!" is a conspiracy theorist, no matter how many times you lie to yourself about it. If your evidence for the apollo "hoax" sucks then it sucks and you're a retard for believing it. There's nothing you can point to that hasnt been refuted by someone who actually knows what he's talking about
@GUARDIANtrooper Sibrel a hero? An exposed liar and bad journalist a hero? How low must a level be to see such a guy as a hero?
I do not waste my time to comment on this and similar videos. Sibrel has made a very clever job to get his money. There are enough sheeps to follow him without asking his method. Bravo!
You realize that youtube is owned by Google? Their intention is not to "wake up" the people but to make money.
@CHSarahBs An exposed liar by whom? By the perpetrators? That is typical and clichéd to make the truth seemingly a lie so they can win. They want you to believe a lie so badly, they would lie on top of a lie to cover it. It could only take but so much before it falls Sarah and the truth will be exposed. That happens a lot in our country and I'm sure quit a bit in yours. Google and Youtube are scum as well, so what's your point? They give us free marketing and we use it to expose their asses...
@GUARDIANtrooper Exposed by facts. I. e. he claimed to have access to secret NASA footage which was given to him by mistake. This is a simple lie. This footage is available. Sibrle wants you to see him as an expert, but this cab driver is not an expert. An expert would not compare apples (Apollo spacecraft) with lemons (Shuttle).
You do not have to know about science? How naive can a statement be? Engineering, technology, astronomy, geology etc are based on science. No your POV is no wonder.
@GUARDIANtrooper Surely, experts make errors. They are humans. But when the result of an acknowledged expert who supports Apollo is varified by several other acknowledged experts around the whole world, you should consider, that they are right. Show me acknowledged experts who proved Apollo as fake. There is no single one. All the datas and results are available. Scientists are actually working with them. They are able to be backed up and recalculate. This is how science works.
@CHSarahBs I don't consider anyone or any group as being correct if I expect a HOAX by any means. If your boyfriend and you are deeply in love and just doing everything together day in and out, what would you do if he suddenly changed? You will immediately get suspicious, right? If not, you don't want to know just to keep him. This is how I feel about the moon landings and you believers of it. There are thousands of people that doesn't believe and where is your proof on the opposition?
@GUARDIANtrooper The relation to my boyfriend is a matter of subjectivity. In this case I can not be objective.
The proof is, that acknowledged scientists all over the world are working with Apollos results and datas and there is no one claiming a fake. The burden of proof is on the side of the claimants, which is usual in science and other fields like judiciary. You make a claim against an acknowledged fact, now you have to proof yourself right.
@GUARDIANtrooper Why do you accept these people as "experts" then ignore the 1000s of actual experts in geology,physics,maths,engineering and astronomy from universities,museums,space agencies and astronomical facilites worldwide who`ve studied the Apollo data,footage and samples and believe Apollo is real? 100s of peer reviewed academic papers have been written on Apollo,all are in favour of Apollo.There`s a simple reality.people who study the evidence of the data,footage and samples believe it
@GUARDIANtrooper ... and other fields have presented a paper (peer-reviewed) which says, Apollo was faked. Only Sibrel, Percy, Kaysing and other so-called heroes did it. And why? They wanted or still want to make money, to sell their books and DVDs to their followers, who blindly believe this unscientific nonsense and mostly do not understand how science works.
@GUARDIANtrooper Nixon was a liar, correct. But which politician is not a liar? And on the other side, Apollo was Kennedys idea, not Nixons, his hatred political enemy.
@CHSarahBs Kennedy died before the moon hoax, lol! He wanted to go to the moon, but I don't think his intensions were to fake it Sarah. Well, that's what I believe anyways, lol!
@GUARDIANtrooper Kennedy died, right, and Nixon became President in January 1969, when the Apollo program was in full run. So where is your point precisely?
@GUARDIANtrooper If Nixon was able to cover up the greatest hoax in history,why did he fail to cover up a far smaller plot(watergate) and be forced to resign? Nixon also resented Apollo,he saw it ,rightly,as Kennedys legacy and aides later went on record saying the whole programme was a touchy subject in the White house.Nixon loathed Kennedy after the 1960 election.Nixon always saw China as his legacy.Why would Nixon risk it all for a programme that he resented as Kennedys "baby"?
@swfcocs1 Because too many whistleblowers were going to get the shit end of the stick, so they snitched. It is just like anything else. You and I could agree that 911 was an inside job, but not agree on the moon hoax conspiracy, people see thing differently and they act accordingly. Nixon was a puppet and he saw the opportunity to win an election in the name of Kennedy, simple politics. The people loved Kennedy and the space program and the Russians were Winning. So you fake it and WIN it all!
@GUARDIANtrooper So some plots collapse like "anything else" yet the biggest ever (Apollo) has stayed watertight for 40+ years?With regard to Nixon,you`re showing a misunderstanding of the political mind.They are obsessed with their legacy,how they will be remenbered.Nixon,as a shrewd politician,recognized that Apollo and Kennedy would always be linked.Why would he risk everything to fake something that would ensure his rivals legacy? JFK was dead but he hated the whole family
@4FunPlayin Hold a flag in your hand and move it around, it doesn't flop up like a gust of wind hit it. Put in a vacuum and wave it around and it still doesn't react the same way like the Mythbuster suggested. Not to mention they were using NASA's facilities with them present... How many pictures have you seen of the night sky, don't be ridiculous, the moon has no atmosphere so the stars are illuminated even more! You don't need a degree to have common sense and I'm am #43 and counting...
Night sky? oh right yea, take your camera and photo the night sky. I have seen pictures of the night sky photoed by telescopes, however I never saw stars in a photo photoed by a camera since the 90s. Probably not the 60s.
@4FunPlayin First of all, that was not the original film and it was cut. You ever see how they do commercials, they take out all the defects to clean it up to sale a product. But when you get it home it is a joke. Where is the black and white version? Get a good long section wheres the wind is not blowing, chop out the good and speed it up. Pictures can be taken without enhancement with any camera to capture the stars. If you have light manipulating the shot, of course it wouldn't work.
@GUARDIANtrooper Yes it was the original film. WHY WOULD NASA PUT COMMERCIALS IN THEIR MISSION, IN THE MIDDLE OF IT? is there any fucking LOGIC in this sentence? When you will show me a video of wind blowing, wow.
Speed up? oh right, doesn't look like on earth at all. But perhaps I missed the explanation because I laughed at it. There are 3 light sources on the moon, the sun, the earth and the moon itself, especially when the earth has giant clouds, more light would be reflected.
@4FunPlayin What the fuck are you talking about fool, LMAO!! The commercial thingy was an example of how they cut and paste shit together to make a video perfect to sell a product, WTF are you on? There is no fucking light source in the fucking shadows idiot. And the sun will overpower the moon like it does when you are on earth. So moonlight is obsolete and even NASA scientist would admit to that shit...
@4FunPlayin The earth is no source of light versus the sun you idiot, lmao! That's like saying the moon is a source of light in the daytime, can you at least pretend you have some sense? The moon is excluded, and you need a light source to find a brain...
@GUARDIANtrooper Hold on, you deny that the earth is a source for light? and call me an idiot because I accept that fact? moon source for light in daytime? no it is NOT THE SAME. You can see that THERE IS an atmosphere on earth AND NONE on the moon, the sky won't be blue on the moon smartass. You will be able to see the sun AND the earth perfectly shine from the moon.
Idiot back to you. Good laughing at you, keep it up.
@4FunPlayin Earth is not a source of light on the bright side with the sun idiot. Do you deny that the sun is brighter than the earth on the light side although the sun illuminates the moon and earth? Go back and read my first comment and you will read that I said, "the moon has no atmosphere, DUMBASS!" How in the FUCK, did you get a blue sky out of no atmosphere? You don't comprehend shit at all, NOTHING, LMAO!! Just give up...
@GUARDIANtrooper Fuck you are a retard, do you know why the moon shines at night? because the sun from the light is being reflected, SAME HAPPENS WITH EARTH. Do you think we've observed 1000s of different solar system by seeing them? NO, WE KNOW BY THEIR BRIGHTNESS.
Of course it is brighter, that is why we saw the shadow of the spaceship ONLY ONCE, and only saw the man behind the shadow. Idiot.
Wow you are an idiot taking a lot of out context, I said you can't have blue sky w\o atmosphere. IDIOT
@GUARDIANtrooper I suggest you read our discussion, then rethink whose the idiot. When someone asks stupid question, do you think he will get a smart answer? of course not. This applies to you as well.
@4FunPlayin You are not saying shit that makes any sense. Your questions are as ignorant as your lack comprehending answers. Is it that stressful to support lie? Do you not agree that some of this bullshit is the truth? Do you think that NASA is totally honest? Do you have any fucking idea how corrupted all governments are? It's a fucking cliche', everyone jokes about it, because everyone knows, including your stupid acting ass. Why front when you know it's a lie to make yourself right about it?
@GUARDIANtrooper You are a lost case, idiot and dumb. All I am saying is that the earth is a light source as well, yet your ignorance think I said "outshine", you can't be serious. You sir, are an idiot, ignorant style.
@4FunPlayin I didn't say the earth wasn't a light source fool, but what the fuck does that have to do with the moon landing? The earth will never outshine the sun on the light side of the moon so the shit is obsolete, that's what I'm saying idiot... Sir... I'm 17 fool, read my fucking profile... I can't help if you stupid can't comprehend like a 10 year old, stupid fuck...
@GUARDIANtrooper Yes you did, you said "it's like claiming that the moon is a source for light in daytime". Don't lie. What does it have to do with moon landing? you better check why you replied me at first.
If you are 17 it means you are 11th grade, I am 10th. And I know basic physics, my teacher would not lie to me when he tells me the earth is a perfect source for light when you are in space. He has M.A. Are you a redneck or something? go back to high school fool.
@GUARDIANtrooper Denying that the earth does not shine is like denying the moon does not shine. He is actually right when he says the earth is a source for light.
@FlyingSpaghettiMoner I did not deny that the earth is not shining, of course the earth is shining, BRILLIANTLY, WTF?! LMAO!!! I'm telling him that the earth cannot outshine the sun on the light side of the moon, like the moon cannot outshine the sun on the light side of the earth. Read the whole debate, this guy is an idiot and you support him, because you believe in this bullshit moon hoax. You are against the opposition whether it is wrong or right to boost the cause to support this bullshit.
@GUARDIANtrooper Yes I read your "debate" he claims the earth is a source for light and I agree, of course it doesn't outshine.
I myself observed a shadow caused by the moon. The earth is 8 times larger PLUS it has clouds PLUS icy clouds PLUS the moon has no atmosphere, you will never have blue sky on the moon and you will be able to see both the earth AND the sun shine toward you
The so called "scientists" in this video are fools, they only have a basic biography. Not even an academic degree.
@FlyingSpaghettiMoner Wow, you are actually trying to take two sides, therefore your statement didn't make any sense at all... Now you have to realize that I don't believe in any of this moon landing bullshit, videos, pictures and all. So you saying, "I myself observed a shadow cause by the moon," is OBSOLETE, because I know your ass haven't been on the moon. And of course at night with the moon light illuminating the earth, there will be shadows, but not in the daytime. That's my point dude...
@GUARDIANtrooper Huh? haven't you read my comment? I stated this before. The only reason you can't see the moon in day time is because our atmosphere hates us. Our atmosphere is blue in day time due to sunlight, hiding all the light behind it. Remove the atmosphere and on daytime you will be able to see both the moon and the sun.
With advanced telescopes in space we can see both the earth and the sun shine, you dismiss this observation? dare call it a hoax?
@4FunPlayin Maybe you are right. He who doesn't understand the subject thinks he understand everything. I know we are arguing about high school physics but arguing with people who don't understand the subject is my entertainment.
@FlyingSpaghettiMoner Our atmosphere is our life support and you can see the moon in the daytime, the sunlight is just overpowering, nothing more... Why don't they create a telescope that could see the surface of the moon like they use the satellite to pinpoint a big on the ground. They don't want you to see what's on the moon, because they didn't land there. Use your common sense, they got you people trained on this bullshit. Be a skeptic and experiment on your own terms and learn the truth...
@FlyingSpaghettiMoner Just stick with the moon hoax bullshit, you don't have any sense for anything else. At least you and your likes could follow the leader with that bullshit. I'm done with your ignorant ass, LMAO.....
1:00 "NASA could cover it up" well, send a mail to O'Leary and ask him. His response was " I didn't see the show (I never know about these things until after they happen), but I believe Apollo did happen in its entirety (I was there)"
People should really search on google about every claim this video claim
@sonedz Where`s the proof of a hoax? Why didn`t the USSR expose any hoax? They were involved in a global struggle for control of the Earth with the US in 1969.An exposure of a hoax would have been a massive PR win for the soviets and a totally devastating,possibly world changing,blow to the US.They had the means and motive to expose a hoax and yet nothing.Is this likely?
@Supablonde1 Wheres the proof for a hoax? Why didn`t the USSR expose any hoax? It`d have been a huge PR win for the soviets.Why haven`t the 1000s of experts in geology,maths,physics and astronomy who have studied the apollo data,footage and samples exposed any hoax?why haven`t the Chinese,Russian,Indian,Japanese or Indian space agencies exposed it? Is it likely that Nixon pulled off the biggest hoax in history then 5 years later made such a mess of a smaller plot(watergate) that he had to quit?
@swfcocs1 - I get your point but thats just my opinion and what i believe. The American government has lots of hidden secrets we may never ever find out so you may not know the truth yourself!!!! never put your trust in any man!!!! =)
@Supablonde1 You`re correct,small conspiracies happen all the time,usually over sex and/or money.It`s the sheer scale of any apollo hoax that makes one impossible.Have you seen the JAXA(Japanese space agency) photos taken recently by their probe of 2 of the apollo landing sites? If not it`s worth 5 minutes of your time to google them! You`re dead right about trust,especially of people in authority.I studied the apollo data when I was younger and trust that,not a govt`s word on it`s own
@Supablonde1 No problem.Have you also seen the mythbusters apollo special episode?It`s on utube and is also worth a watch.I hope you find the right(in my humble opinion!)answers from this evidence
2) Low self-esteem, and therefore must feel like they know something the rest of us don't to feel better about themselves. Fall victim to category #1. Also usually uneducated (i.e. did not pay attention in the hard classes in school).
This goes for Moon Landing hoaxers, the 9/11 hoaxers, etc.
Really can't put it any simpler than that. They basically have no grasp of physics or logical thinking.
@RamJim9697 Hardly simple.Why would NASA spend billions doing that,knowing full well that the apollo conspiracy theorists would still cry hoax? JAXA has photoed the apollo sites and that`s been denounced as fake.Would the Japanese really help NASA fake it?For most hoaxsters no proof is enough,short of literally going themselves! Surely it is for the hoaxsters to prove their allegations,as in court people dont need to prove their innocence! No real proof in 40+ years.Is that feasible?
@swfcocs1 I dont think anyone should care if its real or fake. Peronally i think its real, But the point was to learn about the moon, If they fake it, That doesnt help them at all. They need test samples.. Faking it wouldnt help them, they dont care what people think, Only that the job gets done and they learn, So why would it be fake?
i belive they had fly up there but i don't belive that they landed on the moon...if they did this in 1969 when the technology wasn't so developed why they can't do this now in 2011 when the technology is so developed and USA is so powerful that could make everything happene?
Because rocket technology is NOT that "developed" as you say, we still face the same problem. We have to use a chemically fueled rocket as big as a mountain to get a tiny payload to the moon that is just barely big enough to land and take off again. Until we come up with a more advanced propulsion system, going to the moon to get another sack of rocks would be stupid.
the reason there is no stars is because of light pollution. for example: when its day time, and you look up at the sky, theres no stars because the sun is so bright, and because of there being so many buildings and street lights in a big city at night, you cant see as many stars as you would. plus the flag only moves when the astronauts touch it and the only reason its moves more than usual is because theres no atmosphere. no atmosphere equals no friction.
@jenleex The Russians attitude on the US feat w/ the Apollos pretty much sums it up. The Russians basically sucked on their proposed moon landings bcoz of being anti-American ideology, not accepting what works, rushing the construction and planning while US even had hired Von Braun, a Nazi and V2 engineer, in the construction of the rocket that launched the 1st US satellite to space (Jupiter C) and men to orbit (Saturn).
@jenleex The Russians attitude on the US feat w/ the Apollos pretty much sums it up. The Russians basically sucked on their proposed moon landings bcoz of being anti-American ideology, not accepting what works, rushing the construction and planning while US even had hired Von Braun, a Nazi and V2 engineer, in the construction of the rocket that launched the 1st US satellite to space (Jupiter C) and men to orbit (Saturn).
Jaxa say there is nothing at the landing sites..so that is it .. the USA bilt nuclear bombs, but some years later the USSR did, the same with the jet engine, the big question is this..why has the USSR never been to the moon they may have been a bit behind the USA but 40 years behind ? the USSR only needs to us old 1969 technology to go to the moon so why don't they go and build a moon base there ? and why no other counties China, India, Japan go with old 1969 technolgy ?????
@jenleex The Russians attitude on the US feat w/ the Apollos pretty much sums it up. The Russians basically sucked on their proposed moon landings bcoz of being anti-American ideology, not accepting what works, rushing the construction and planning while US even had hired Von Braun, a Nazi and V2 engineer, in the construction of the rocket that launched the 1st US satellite to space (Jupiter C) and men to orbit (Saturn).
I think this is the most overwhelming evidence of all, and it can't be denied by anyone - listen:
If NASA wanted to "fool the world", then that must mean the world took for granted that we had to receive the recordings FROM THE MOON - how could we get the live recordings from there if nobody was there to begin with?
Why oh why, is it so in vogue to despise America. Leviticus 26:19 (King James Version) 19And I will break the pride of your power; and I will make your heaven as iron, and your earth as brass
@johnnyoverkill Wow you need an education. If you dont know why you cant see the stars then you need to look it up because it has been explained retard. Damn you are stupid. How come when you are in a city at night and you look up you cant see stars moron? Damn you are a fucking retard.
my grand father worked for nasa during moon landing he told me rockets when into sapce that part is true moon walking was staged funds used for cia opps
Maybe thats why America haven’t gone to the moon since because the video might be different and then America will have to admit it was a HOAX just to win the space race.
cool
billpage 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We landed on the moon not once but six times. That is one hell of a conspiracy eh? 24 different astronauts. You deniers are just plain insane in the brain. * Apollo 11 landed 20 July 1969 * Apollo 12 landed 19 November 1969 * Apollo 14 landed 5 February 1971 * Apollo 15 landed 30 July 1971 * Apollo 16 landed 20 April 1972 * Apollo 17 landed 11 December 1972
TheThumper49 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As far as anything left or placed on the surface of the moon, all could have been done by unmanned spacecraft or probes flying over the moon and dropping it to the surface. Even by a roving probe dropped to the surface and then driven off into a crater or to the darkside.
When NASA admitted several years ago that all plans no longer exsisted for all Apollo missions, that's when flags went up for many people. They said it was all destroyed because they had no room to store it????!!!! Huh?
thexrayman50 3 months ago
NASA CRIMINALS
FAKE EVERYTHING
NasaCriminals 3 months ago
There are too many idiots, WHAT DO?
xxdangerouslyinsanex 5 months ago
SPOILER ALERT
we did
xxdangerouslyinsanex 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch the documentary "astronauts gone wild" available on YouTube to see the true nature of the clowns and criminals who participated in the Apollo moon scam.Their personalities and their behaviour is as good as a direct confession of their crimes.
potrodsas 6 months ago
Dont make sense to me
I Think they fake it
markly90 6 months ago
@markly90 Did you actually study any of the mountains of real evidence that supports the moon landings,or did you just watch a utube hoax vid? 1000s of experts in geology,physics,engineering,radiology,astronomy etc have studied the Apollo data,film and samples.NASA brought back 400+ KG of moon rock.It has been analysed by geologists worldwide,including russia and China.If it was a hoax,why didn`t the USSR expose it as fake? Why would they allow their hated rivals to claim a "fake" landing ?
swfcocs1 6 months ago
Dont make sense to me
Sry America but i think they fake it
markly90 6 months ago
Dont make sense to me
I Think they fake it .. Sry america
markly90 6 months ago
All of you who keep saying "ofcause we landed on the Moon some people just wanna say that they faked it"
Just look at the video and what they say about they had problems just getting Off the Ground and ask yourself why they havnt been there since then its over 30 years if they knew how to get on the Moon As they Said they was Then you should expect that they would have done it again and again to build that base on the moon As they wished for but after what i know they never tryed again hmmm don
markly90 6 months ago
@markly90 Why the hell would we want to go to the moon again? What's so special there? We can send all the damn probes we want. We know more about the moon than we do the oceans, and its not changing
xxdangerouslyinsanex 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Armstrong is expecting soon NOT to be known a space man anymore.
We can all think of only one reason for that.
watch?v=j6i6Nok-pv8
potrodsas 7 months ago
It is obvious that we did DEFINITELY go to the moon. You can tell when Sir. Armstrong the 2nd speaks that his voice is very 'spacey' and quite 'moony' - for those of you that have experience weightlessness like myself, like when you are found in a Y hole cruncked off your kebabas, you would understand and see exactly what the moon landing was all about. AMERICANISM. I for one would not offend myself with associated with the haters. "Too infinity and beyond" as Aldrin said as he reached space.
supbuddywhatsgoingon 7 months ago
Well is it not clear for all with a brain to see? Surely no one truely believes that the US went to the moon!? It is so obvious, secret documents that were leaked privately prove catagorically that the US and the USSR shared information to enable man to go to the moon to recover "mysterious foreign artefacts". It was not US space men that were in Apollo, it was an international team that went. The signals are clear, what was shown on TV was fake, but man did go to the moon.
commissar999 7 months ago
@commissar999 It would be surprising to see any proof for your claims, especially about the so-called secret documents ;)
CHSarahBs 7 months ago
Only Eddie Izzard knows the real truth; search YouTube for "Eddie Izzard - Dress to Kill - Landing on the Moon
JohnMalcolm 8 months ago
The flag waving in the "breeze" is actually proof that they were in a vacuum. When he was jamming the flag in see how he twisted it? That set it in motion. There is no atmosphere, no air. That means there is little friction to slow down the flag. Therefore the flag would be moving for a helluva lot longer then it normally would. Perform that same stunt in a vacuum chamber and see for yourself. When Bill Kaysing pointed out the flag he shot his own theory in the foot.
roeder2135 8 months ago
so tell me the moon landing was basically a giant f u to the soviet union yet they didn't call it fake im sure they had hundreds if not thousands of scientists studying the footage what makes you youtube degree retards think you know better
jimmyjimjim4567 8 months ago
@jimmyjimjim4567 The Soviets never said they believe the Americans went to the moon, NEVER... American propaganda did. The Soviets have been hiding their little secret space program for decades and no one knew. If they could do that, then why can't we keep our people quiet? It's a HOAX and people believe the shit is true. Who will believe a handful of people over hundreds? That is why they don't talk, because they don't have a chance unless they can show proof without dying, make sense, right?
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper god you are such the stereotypical tin foil hat person omg if i talk the government going to kill me. Why are you so sure its a hoak you do know the physics required to land on the moon is well understood and was implemented. perhaps if you knew even a little bit of rocket science you would see that it was perfectly feasible.
jimmyjimjim4567 8 months ago
@jimmyjimjim4567 And you are riding that pig with your adjectives of lame ass suggestions, stick to the topic. What the fuck is a hoak, a new conspiracy maybe?
Have you been to the moon to check their claims or do you just take their word for it like any other fool of your like? Of course you never been to the moon, so don't be too sure of your bullshit antics. I seek the truth and I speak against bullshit and those who orchestrate and support this lie. America is better than this bullshit...
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper you know what im not even going to bother continuing this shit you fucking nutjobs piss me off so much if the majority of the human race was like you were would we be the stone age thats where. Any advancement you would cry fake or say it cant be done lets just accept we cant do anything. I hope you dont have kids the last thing we need is more people who are just happy to sit idle and not work to better mankind.
jimmyjimjim4567 8 months ago
@jimmyjimjim4567 I am for technology fool and you are for bullshit, that is a very big difference. Yeah FUCK OFF, I don't give a fuck... You want to make a stupid ass comment in the comment section and think you won't get attack, think again. If this bullshit HOAX was to self destruct, you idiots would still believe we went to the moon. How do I know that, because I asked and they answered correctly. THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END...
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
NASA people went to the blue moon ,there is no other explanation.
watch?v=mOY0WkZAnEY
potrodsas 9 months ago
YES, we did not land on the moon, lol! And, we can't land on the moon by holding on to that lie that we did... We first have to make a contraption that could even travel that distance with the proper amount of trust to even make it that far and back. Then we have to figure out how to get pass our life support system, the VAN ALLEN belts. We need to undo Nixon's lies and start over. Work with other countries to achieve even greater challenges to venture beyond our expectations. Earth Exploration.
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
Answer to the author's question is yes. Yes we did.
Compert123 9 months ago
NASA claims 27 of its people went to the Moon well back in the technological antiquity in the middle of the last century.According to the claim 3 people each time in 9 missions.Each mission lasted about 10 days so the total of human present in outer space(allegedly)was about 90 days.All of these people were trained in photography and they had a total of about 60 still photo and video cameras with unlimited film.But guess what.Not one of the the 32,000 images they returned containing any stars
potrodsas 9 months ago
Waving flag.. of course it's waving he is moving it
no stars - get your high tec camera and photo the sky, tell me the results
Reph, the person who is a "scientist" actually never went to a university.
Seriously, 42 people actually buy this story.
4FunPlayin 9 months ago
@4FunPlayin I do not buy this story, it is nonsense. But this clip (and the documentary) is pure fun. You can see, how easy it is, to manipulate simple minded people. The creators are clever to get money from their followers.
CHSarahBs 9 months ago
@CHSarahBs Sarah, how is this nonsense when it is exploring the facts of what the people involved are saying that it was or could be a hoax? These people are professionals and they were right there. They are the few that have the courage to speak out. Bill Kaysing worked for the company that designed the Apollo rockets at that time. He concluded that they had too many problems to make it to the moon, but the mission was flawless? Nixon was a liar and got impeached, that doesn't arouse suspicion?
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Bart Sibrel is not a professional scientist. He is a filmmaker, and not a good one. Kaysing was not a scientist, he had a degree in English. Yes, he worked for Rocketdyne, but he had no scientific background. See his questions about the flag, the missing crater, the missing stars etc. Questions which are answered very easy by using basic scientific knowledge. Kaysing was clever in one single field: To sell his book (cont.)
CHSarahBs 9 months ago
@CHSarahBs So are you a scientist? You don't have to be a scientist to experiment. A degree is just a piece of paper that gives you respect of that study. A filmmaker would be perfect for a hoax like this. He could pinpoint any inconsistencies that would suggest a hoax or fakery, he's a filmmaker, it's what he does... If you worked around rockets and have all knowledge of them, in the armed forces, AND..., been following this hoax since then, why aren't you an eligible candidate for this?
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper No, I am not a scientist. Sibrel and his companions pretend to be scientists and made false statements, claims and conclusion, which have been debunked by real scientists. The most of the hoax accusations can be debunked by logic and with a bit of common sense and basic science. If there were one acknowledged expert/scientists, stating that Apollo was a hoax, I would change my mind. But unitl now no expert in photography, radiation, aerospace, aeronautics, astronomy, geology...
CHSarahBs 9 months ago
@CHSarahBs They didn't claim to be scientist they just give their assessment in their field as it was expressed in this video. Their positions are acceptable, excluding those who believe in this hoax. This alone gives gas to any hoax that people that do believe will even contest this at such magnitudes. Why support this lie and continue fight against concrete evidence? Threats make it impossible for scientist and astronauts to speak out, their lives and careers are on the line, would you talk?
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Their positions would be acceptable, if they did not lie. Sibrel and Percy i.e. pretend to be experts. There is no single evidence for a hoax and no proof for threats.
CHSarahBs 9 months ago
@CHSarahBs How do you prove a threat? And if there is absolutely any evidence of a hoax, then why are we debating? Why is anyone debating? Why is our $300,000 amateur science program grounded by government trolls, because we ventured beyond the exosphere? Why did they threaten our future if we try to go to the press about it? Our prototype could probably at least make it to the Van Allen belts just to see if it is possible to do so... They don't want that, because that would answer questions...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Is there anything available online about this project that could "probably reach the VA belts"? I`m not mocking,I am genuinely interested.
swfcocs1 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper The main problem with your statement is, with all respect to your point of view, that there is no shred of evidence for a moon hoax. All the claims can be easily explained with a bit of scientific knowlidge, common sense and logic. I can only speak for myself. I am debating here, because there are some people believing this nonsense, spread by Sibrel, Kaysing etc and follow this blindly because it is against the common opinion. (cont.)
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@CHSarahBs If there is no evidence, then why are we debating, why is this issue debatable? This HOAX is not based on a few people in which you and your likes referred to as NUTS. Kaysing has giving his assessment from his point of knowledge with the experience that he applied to it, to be acceptable by all excluding his adversaries, namely you and all that believe in the moon landings. People were following the moon landings blindly for over 40 years and now alternative media is changing that...
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper It is not a question of believing. A scientific acknowledged fact is prooved by experts and scientists. Apollo is an acknowledged fact. Proofs for it are available in scientific peer-reviewed articles, reports, datas etc. All the evidences which Kaysing brought up are debunked. Kaysing was not really a liar, he had not enough knowledge about the subject. I could say the same about the hoax believers, following blindly the stuff which is told to them by these alternative medias.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@CHSarahBs You think scientists and experts are automatic proof that a HOAX is not evident. I guess you think that nether one of these individuals has never lied in their lives. And, if you are not an expert, you don't have the sense or common sense to declare fact or fiction, lies or truth, wrong or right, real or fake? You are pretty much calling people dumb and stupid, because they don't have a degree and they don't have a voice. Therefore a HOAX is not feasible, right? It works both ways...
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper As I said, experts and scientists publish their work (including their proofs) in PEER-REVIEWED papers, so their results can be backed up by others. This is how science works. And in this very transparent way Apollo has been examined and acknowledged as a historic fact.
I call people dumb, when they are following blindly an exposed liar for the only reason, that his statement is against the government/USA/Jews/mainstream or something like that.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@CHSarahBs Everything is corrupted pertaining to this moon HOAX, it's a HOAX... If a president is found guilty of a crime, why can't a group of individuals be manipulated into a hoax for their agenda. That is not proof, it's corporation to insure a career spot in the name of a lie. It's simply going along with the course. My teacher is part of it and every time someone tries to contest it, it is over ruled, how could anyone voice an opposing opinion on anything? Is the government totally honest?
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper I would call it a hoax, if there was one shred of evidence, not only unsubstained claims without any scientific basis. The main problem for hoax believers is, that the landings are acknowledged as a historic fact and that the burden of proof is on their side. I can not see a political reason for a moon hoax (Kennedys project but finished in the Nixon era), but I am swiss and do not bother with US-politics.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@CHSarahBs But Sarah, where is the proof? I haven't found any proof of a moon landing, it looks totally fabricated and when you dig deeper, it is evident that it is totally fabricated, therefore it is conclusive that it is a HOAX. By you saying that you don't bother with America's political system, you are excluding yourself from the debate, because this is politics Sarah. You said it yourself, this was Kennedy's project and was finished by Nixon, right? You can't get more political than that...
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper The proof is in the scientific papers from scientists round the world, from independant scientist either, who are not involved in NASA.
It should be interesting, which details are looking fabricated. You have to remember, that it was a very strange environment, not to compare with the environment on Earth.
I am not excluding myself by pointing out the scientific results. I want to ask you a question about logic (next post)
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper The issue is not debatable, because it is an acknowledged fact. But there are some people, who can not accept scientific findings and results, so they have to make up their own stuff. Most of it is without any scientific basis. Some of it are simple (and mostly silly) lies. Other things are misinterpretations and misunderstandings. This is debatable.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@CHSarahBs If that is true Sarah, then why are you here fighting for the truth? Leave these idiots to their ignorant opinions, right? If they don't want to accept it, then I guess your job is to force feed them into a deeper quarrel that leads back to square one like we did. Oh yeah, you are a cutie by the way, lol! But you must understand Sarah, most people that debate these issues to the opposition don't believe, because of common sense. The whole ordeal just seems too impossible...
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Can you tell me the logic, why Nixon should fake a project, which was started by his hatred enemy Kennedy? The success will be ever belong to Kennedy, not to Nixon. For me it would be more logic to let it go. If there is a possibility for a failure, it would be better for Nixon.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@CHSarahBs Kennedy was assassinated, remember? WIth all due respect, Kennedy believed that we could go to the moon, but Nixon found out it was impossible. Therefore, "IF YOU CAN'T MAKE IT, FAKE IT." Probably another reason why Kennedy was assassinated, he would go along with the HOAX, lol! I really don't believe that, but I wouldn't put it pass our government to kill for those reasons. You can't trust people that hide too many things, you must be up to no good, do you not agree?
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper I do not agree. I only see speculations and no bit of logic. Kennedy was the inventor of Apollo. Assassinated or not, Nixon was his political enemy and hated the whole Kennedy Clan. I can not see any logic, that Nixon would faked Apollo to give Kennedy a posthum credibility and honor. Nixon would say "Let them go and fail" to reach a PR success for his administration.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@CHSarahBs Nixon was a puppet, he only did what the puppeteers ask, which is why he didn't get impeached. Politicians aren't enemies, Kennedy was and he got killed for not playing along. Look at Barack, Clinton and McCain. They were enemies in the worst way in the election, but now, they work together is perfect harmony? Our country is corrupted Sarah and so is yours. Kennedy didn't launch the mission, he died. Going to the moon was to defeat the Russians and the Russians are still trying...
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper I am not fighting for the truth. I correct obvious mistakes and try to direct the people to the right direction. I comment obvious lies and misinformation. As I have said before, these things are debatable.
Cutie? Hm, I hope this was a compliment ;) If yes, thank you.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@CHSarahBs Ok, if you are in the business of correcting the obvious mistakes, what degrees do you have to go along with your analyses? It works both ways Sarah, right? The ones that are the so-called misinformers believe without a shadow of a doubt that this moon landing is a HOAX, according to their expertise along side your opinions and your likes. I believe it was a HOAX and you don't. Your opinion, my opinion, with giving evidence from both sizes. And now China has confirmed it deeper...
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Their expertises are definitively wrong. This has been analysed by experts. Sibrel was wrong and lied. Percy was wrong and made a step backwards in saying, that the moonlandings happened, but the footage was faked. Allen was wrong and lied, Groves was wrong and lied. It is all examined. My opinion does not change the fact, that those people have lied and/or were wrong.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@CHSarahBs They are experts and it is easy to have someone working with the apposing side to say the other side is wrong, how is that proof that they are wrong? NASA lied, but you still believe them on this issue. No, he said the moon landings may have been real, but the pictures and videos were faked. Why would these guys lie about this, what is the reason to lie about this if it was real? It doesn't make sense to lie on NASA other than... But NASA, I see every reason to lie, think about it...
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Seeing their examinations I can only say, they do not act like experts. Take Percys statement, that he had examined all Apollo images. This is not true, otherwise he would know, that there are many photos which are not perfect, which are simply out of focus, overexposed etc. Groves examination is also questionable and not expert-like. An expert would have taken the same camera with the same equipment. So they are simply liars.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@CHSarahBs That's just it, they aren't acting, it is real life and being honest, unlike the ones accused. If NASA put out photos that are questionable, the answer would be skepticism, that's not too hard to figure out. What is not exert-like? Is it expert-like to put out photos that are questionable to arouse suspicion and skepticism? It works both ways and the so-called experts make mistakes too, but not more stupidly like the perpetrators that are being accused, they started the fire...
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Remembering the style of examination (Groves used a very different camera and exposed it to a higher radiation level; Allen investigated a photomontage in a book, not the original photo; Sibrel compares Shuttles and Apollo followed by obvious lies about the availability of footage and photos; and it is going on this style) I can clearly say, that this documentary and all the others are bullshit. Each claim has been answered directly, the most of them 40 years ago.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@CHSarahBs NASA made a book with colored pictures and you could see that they manipulated the photos big time. You can see double images in the same vicinity of others, knowing that conspiracy theorists will point this out, why do this? Pointing out mistakes isn't lying, it is more expressive to make a point. If NASA lied about anything it is all debatable and tagged a HOAX. NASA lies are conclusive and the number of people viewing THIS video that agree surpasses your claims of bullshit...
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Asking things you do not understand is absolutely ok. But you are not willing to accept answers which do not fit to your worldview.
This 10 years old Fox documentary is a sad example for biased and (in first place) bad journalism. This documentary exposed Sibrel as a simple liar who has no idea about making a complete research, who compares apples with bananas and is making stuff up. He has no idea about rocketry, radiation and other important fields.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@CHSarahBs If this documentary is sad then why waste your time with it, its been 10 years right? Youtube is about 6 years old and it is an enemy to all government bullshit and people are waking up, FINALLY. I know the moon landing is a HOAX, not just, because of the things I see on here, but personal experiences. I don't see Sibrel as a liar, but a HERO, to challenge our government. You have to fight fire with fire. I really don't know all the details your homeland, but USA, it is pretty bad...
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Man,you guys.Who do you think owns youtube? Answer= google.One of the multi billion dollar companies that rule the capitalist world.I sometimes think conspiracy theorists believe they own youtube.If you lived in the tyranny you believe,why would google allow you to post this stuff? Why does Sibrel,a taxi driver,know more about Apollo than scientists,geologists,engineers and astronomers who`ve studied the Apollo data? Many of these experts are from countries unfriendly to the US
swfcocs1 8 months ago
@swfcocs1 We own google, it can't run itself, we built it up. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, because the truth is no theory, but a man who lets someone take his freedom away for security is a fool. They are afraid of us, UNITY is power idiot, that is why we fight to drive them back, the internet is a new world now. You don't have to know more about science to see a fucking HOAX, a con, a crook, a liar, a manipulator, a killer, a thief, etc. It doesn't matter what country, common sense works.
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper I`m an idiot yet you think "we" own google? It`s a multi billion dollar company owned by shareholders and executives who get paid dividends not "us"."they" aren`t remotely scared of "you" as all you truthers ever do is moan endlessly online .What have you actually done about this "tyranny".In the 1930`s,when people died fighting actual tyranny,it was said that people who did nothing about fascist tyranny were complicit in that tyranny.I ask again,what have you actually done?
swfcocs1 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper
"Common sense" is the first newb cliche of hoax dorks who dont have any. Any idiot who screams "HOAX!" is a conspiracy theorist, no matter how many times you lie to yourself about it. If your evidence for the apollo "hoax" sucks then it sucks and you're a retard for believing it. There's nothing you can point to that hasnt been refuted by someone who actually knows what he's talking about
SpreadingtheMuse 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Sibrel a hero? An exposed liar and bad journalist a hero? How low must a level be to see such a guy as a hero?
I do not waste my time to comment on this and similar videos. Sibrel has made a very clever job to get his money. There are enough sheeps to follow him without asking his method. Bravo!
You realize that youtube is owned by Google? Their intention is not to "wake up" the people but to make money.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@CHSarahBs An exposed liar by whom? By the perpetrators? That is typical and clichéd to make the truth seemingly a lie so they can win. They want you to believe a lie so badly, they would lie on top of a lie to cover it. It could only take but so much before it falls Sarah and the truth will be exposed. That happens a lot in our country and I'm sure quit a bit in yours. Google and Youtube are scum as well, so what's your point? They give us free marketing and we use it to expose their asses...
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Exposed by facts. I. e. he claimed to have access to secret NASA footage which was given to him by mistake. This is a simple lie. This footage is available. Sibrle wants you to see him as an expert, but this cab driver is not an expert. An expert would not compare apples (Apollo spacecraft) with lemons (Shuttle).
You do not have to know about science? How naive can a statement be? Engineering, technology, astronomy, geology etc are based on science. No your POV is no wonder.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper" You can see double images in the same vicinity of others,"
Reference one of these double images please.
Since when is what is truth up for a vote?
TheEntropyEpoch 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Surely, experts make errors. They are humans. But when the result of an acknowledged expert who supports Apollo is varified by several other acknowledged experts around the whole world, you should consider, that they are right. Show me acknowledged experts who proved Apollo as fake. There is no single one. All the datas and results are available. Scientists are actually working with them. They are able to be backed up and recalculate. This is how science works.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@CHSarahBs I don't consider anyone or any group as being correct if I expect a HOAX by any means. If your boyfriend and you are deeply in love and just doing everything together day in and out, what would you do if he suddenly changed? You will immediately get suspicious, right? If not, you don't want to know just to keep him. This is how I feel about the moon landings and you believers of it. There are thousands of people that doesn't believe and where is your proof on the opposition?
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper The relation to my boyfriend is a matter of subjectivity. In this case I can not be objective.
The proof is, that acknowledged scientists all over the world are working with Apollos results and datas and there is no one claiming a fake. The burden of proof is on the side of the claimants, which is usual in science and other fields like judiciary. You make a claim against an acknowledged fact, now you have to proof yourself right.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GUARDIANtrooper Why do you accept these people as "experts" then ignore the 1000s of actual experts in geology,physics,maths,engineering and astronomy from universities,museums,space agencies and astronomical facilites worldwide who`ve studied the Apollo data,footage and samples and believe Apollo is real? 100s of peer reviewed academic papers have been written on Apollo,all are in favour of Apollo.There`s a simple reality.people who study the evidence of the data,footage and samples believe it
swfcocs1 8 months ago
@CHSarahBs I have not to prove the claimed threats against scientists. You made it, so you have to show proofs, otherwise it is only an accusation.
CHSarahBs 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper ... and other fields have presented a paper (peer-reviewed) which says, Apollo was faked. Only Sibrel, Percy, Kaysing and other so-called heroes did it. And why? They wanted or still want to make money, to sell their books and DVDs to their followers, who blindly believe this unscientific nonsense and mostly do not understand how science works.
CHSarahBs 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Nixon was a liar, correct. But which politician is not a liar? And on the other side, Apollo was Kennedys idea, not Nixons, his hatred political enemy.
CHSarahBs 9 months ago
@CHSarahBs Kennedy died before the moon hoax, lol! He wanted to go to the moon, but I don't think his intensions were to fake it Sarah. Well, that's what I believe anyways, lol!
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Kennedy died, right, and Nixon became President in January 1969, when the Apollo program was in full run. So where is your point precisely?
CHSarahBs 9 months ago
@CHSarahBs Nixon is just as phony as the moon landing...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper If Nixon was able to cover up the greatest hoax in history,why did he fail to cover up a far smaller plot(watergate) and be forced to resign? Nixon also resented Apollo,he saw it ,rightly,as Kennedys legacy and aides later went on record saying the whole programme was a touchy subject in the White house.Nixon loathed Kennedy after the 1960 election.Nixon always saw China as his legacy.Why would Nixon risk it all for a programme that he resented as Kennedys "baby"?
swfcocs1 9 months ago
@swfcocs1 Because too many whistleblowers were going to get the shit end of the stick, so they snitched. It is just like anything else. You and I could agree that 911 was an inside job, but not agree on the moon hoax conspiracy, people see thing differently and they act accordingly. Nixon was a puppet and he saw the opportunity to win an election in the name of Kennedy, simple politics. The people loved Kennedy and the space program and the Russians were Winning. So you fake it and WIN it all!
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper So some plots collapse like "anything else" yet the biggest ever (Apollo) has stayed watertight for 40+ years?With regard to Nixon,you`re showing a misunderstanding of the political mind.They are obsessed with their legacy,how they will be remenbered.Nixon,as a shrewd politician,recognized that Apollo and Kennedy would always be linked.Why would he risk everything to fake something that would ensure his rivals legacy? JFK was dead but he hated the whole family
swfcocs1 9 months ago
@4FunPlayin No, 42 people liked the documentary.
masteretl 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@masteretl i.e. buy this story
4FunPlayin 9 months ago
@4FunPlayin Hold a flag in your hand and move it around, it doesn't flop up like a gust of wind hit it. Put in a vacuum and wave it around and it still doesn't react the same way like the Mythbuster suggested. Not to mention they were using NASA's facilities with them present... How many pictures have you seen of the night sky, don't be ridiculous, the moon has no atmosphere so the stars are illuminated even more! You don't need a degree to have common sense and I'm am #43 and counting...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper
This is your waving flag:
/watch?v=MunPi3ifqpw
Night sky? oh right yea, take your camera and photo the night sky. I have seen pictures of the night sky photoed by telescopes, however I never saw stars in a photo photoed by a camera since the 90s. Probably not the 60s.
Any argument this video suggest is really stupid.
4FunPlayin 9 months ago
@4FunPlayin First of all, that was not the original film and it was cut. You ever see how they do commercials, they take out all the defects to clean it up to sale a product. But when you get it home it is a joke. Where is the black and white version? Get a good long section wheres the wind is not blowing, chop out the good and speed it up. Pictures can be taken without enhancement with any camera to capture the stars. If you have light manipulating the shot, of course it wouldn't work.
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Yes it was the original film. WHY WOULD NASA PUT COMMERCIALS IN THEIR MISSION, IN THE MIDDLE OF IT? is there any fucking LOGIC in this sentence? When you will show me a video of wind blowing, wow.
Speed up? oh right, doesn't look like on earth at all. But perhaps I missed the explanation because I laughed at it. There are 3 light sources on the moon, the sun, the earth and the moon itself, especially when the earth has giant clouds, more light would be reflected.
Fail..
4FunPlayin 9 months ago
@4FunPlayin What the fuck are you talking about fool, LMAO!! The commercial thingy was an example of how they cut and paste shit together to make a video perfect to sell a product, WTF are you on? There is no fucking light source in the fucking shadows idiot. And the sun will overpower the moon like it does when you are on earth. So moonlight is obsolete and even NASA scientist would admit to that shit...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper You involved first the commercials, blame yourself.
NASA admitted that? rofl. When? exactly, no time. But I just said 3 sources for light and you keep shouting "NO SOURCES FOR LIGHT LALALALA".
The sun #1
The earth #2 (especially with icy clouds)
The moon itself #3
Your response is:
"LALALAL NO LIGHT SOURCE. MUST HAVE BEEN FAKED"
4FunPlayin 9 months ago
@4FunPlayin The earth is no source of light versus the sun you idiot, lmao! That's like saying the moon is a source of light in the daytime, can you at least pretend you have some sense? The moon is excluded, and you need a light source to find a brain...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Hold on, you deny that the earth is a source for light? and call me an idiot because I accept that fact? moon source for light in daytime? no it is NOT THE SAME. You can see that THERE IS an atmosphere on earth AND NONE on the moon, the sky won't be blue on the moon smartass. You will be able to see the sun AND the earth perfectly shine from the moon.
Idiot back to you. Good laughing at you, keep it up.
4FunPlayin 9 months ago
@4FunPlayin Earth is not a source of light on the bright side with the sun idiot. Do you deny that the sun is brighter than the earth on the light side although the sun illuminates the moon and earth? Go back and read my first comment and you will read that I said, "the moon has no atmosphere, DUMBASS!" How in the FUCK, did you get a blue sky out of no atmosphere? You don't comprehend shit at all, NOTHING, LMAO!! Just give up...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Fuck you are a retard, do you know why the moon shines at night? because the sun from the light is being reflected, SAME HAPPENS WITH EARTH. Do you think we've observed 1000s of different solar system by seeing them? NO, WE KNOW BY THEIR BRIGHTNESS.
Of course it is brighter, that is why we saw the shadow of the spaceship ONLY ONCE, and only saw the man behind the shadow. Idiot.
Wow you are an idiot taking a lot of out context, I said you can't have blue sky w\o atmosphere. IDIOT
4FunPlayin 9 months ago
@4FunPlayin You are out of breath... You don't even know what the fuck you are talking about to yourself anymore. Just give up dude...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper I suggest you read our discussion, then rethink whose the idiot. When someone asks stupid question, do you think he will get a smart answer? of course not. This applies to you as well.
4FunPlayin 9 months ago
@4FunPlayin You are not saying shit that makes any sense. Your questions are as ignorant as your lack comprehending answers. Is it that stressful to support lie? Do you not agree that some of this bullshit is the truth? Do you think that NASA is totally honest? Do you have any fucking idea how corrupted all governments are? It's a fucking cliche', everyone jokes about it, because everyone knows, including your stupid acting ass. Why front when you know it's a lie to make yourself right about it?
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper You are a lost case, idiot and dumb. All I am saying is that the earth is a light source as well, yet your ignorance think I said "outshine", you can't be serious. You sir, are an idiot, ignorant style.
4FunPlayin 9 months ago
@4FunPlayin I didn't say the earth wasn't a light source fool, but what the fuck does that have to do with the moon landing? The earth will never outshine the sun on the light side of the moon so the shit is obsolete, that's what I'm saying idiot... Sir... I'm 17 fool, read my fucking profile... I can't help if you stupid can't comprehend like a 10 year old, stupid fuck...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Yes you did, you said "it's like claiming that the moon is a source for light in daytime". Don't lie. What does it have to do with moon landing? you better check why you replied me at first.
If you are 17 it means you are 11th grade, I am 10th. And I know basic physics, my teacher would not lie to me when he tells me the earth is a perfect source for light when you are in space. He has M.A. Are you a redneck or something? go back to high school fool.
4FunPlayin 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Denying that the earth does not shine is like denying the moon does not shine. He is actually right when he says the earth is a source for light.
FlyingSpaghettiMoner 9 months ago
@FlyingSpaghettiMoner I did not deny that the earth is not shining, of course the earth is shining, BRILLIANTLY, WTF?! LMAO!!! I'm telling him that the earth cannot outshine the sun on the light side of the moon, like the moon cannot outshine the sun on the light side of the earth. Read the whole debate, this guy is an idiot and you support him, because you believe in this bullshit moon hoax. You are against the opposition whether it is wrong or right to boost the cause to support this bullshit.
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Yes I read your "debate" he claims the earth is a source for light and I agree, of course it doesn't outshine.
I myself observed a shadow caused by the moon. The earth is 8 times larger PLUS it has clouds PLUS icy clouds PLUS the moon has no atmosphere, you will never have blue sky on the moon and you will be able to see both the earth AND the sun shine toward you
The so called "scientists" in this video are fools, they only have a basic biography. Not even an academic degree.
FlyingSpaghettiMoner 9 months ago
@FlyingSpaghettiMoner Wow, you are actually trying to take two sides, therefore your statement didn't make any sense at all... Now you have to realize that I don't believe in any of this moon landing bullshit, videos, pictures and all. So you saying, "I myself observed a shadow cause by the moon," is OBSOLETE, because I know your ass haven't been on the moon. And of course at night with the moon light illuminating the earth, there will be shadows, but not in the daytime. That's my point dude...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Huh? haven't you read my comment? I stated this before. The only reason you can't see the moon in day time is because our atmosphere hates us. Our atmosphere is blue in day time due to sunlight, hiding all the light behind it. Remove the atmosphere and on daytime you will be able to see both the moon and the sun.
With advanced telescopes in space we can see both the earth and the sun shine, you dismiss this observation? dare call it a hoax?
FlyingSpaghettiMoner 9 months ago
@FlyingSpaghettiMoner Save your breath, he doesn't worth it. And you'll need it to blow your girl.
4FunPlayin 9 months ago
@4FunPlayin Maybe you are right. He who doesn't understand the subject thinks he understand everything. I know we are arguing about high school physics but arguing with people who don't understand the subject is my entertainment.
FlyingSpaghettiMoner 9 months ago
@FlyingSpaghettiMoner Our atmosphere is our life support and you can see the moon in the daytime, the sunlight is just overpowering, nothing more... Why don't they create a telescope that could see the surface of the moon like they use the satellite to pinpoint a big on the ground. They don't want you to see what's on the moon, because they didn't land there. Use your common sense, they got you people trained on this bullshit. Be a skeptic and experiment on your own terms and learn the truth...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper The sun outshine the moon in daytime because we have atmosphere PLUS the moon is much smaller than the earth..
There's a software called google earth, you can see the moon from anywhere. I am not skeptic in fact, you are.
The problem with skepticism: they never care to find something new, they will stuck and be close minded and never be open minded to new options.
Before you suggest something just do a little research about it. What's next? flat earth conspiracy?
FlyingSpaghettiMoner 9 months ago
@FlyingSpaghettiMoner Just stick with the moon hoax bullshit, you don't have any sense for anything else. At least you and your likes could follow the leader with that bullshit. I'm done with your ignorant ass, LMAO.....
GUARDIANtrooper 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Go back to school, learn science ~ by then you won't think the moon landing was a hoax.
FlyingSpaghettiMoner 8 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Your stupidity grows with every post.
TheFACTSRUS 9 months ago 2
@TheFACTSRUS ....................
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
1:00 "NASA could cover it up" well, send a mail to O'Leary and ask him. His response was " I didn't see the show (I never know about these things until after they happen), but I believe Apollo did happen in its entirety (I was there)"
People should really search on google about every claim this video claim
4FunPlayin 9 months ago in playlist The Moon Did we Land on the Moon?
@sonedz Where`s the proof of a hoax? Why didn`t the USSR expose any hoax? They were involved in a global struggle for control of the Earth with the US in 1969.An exposure of a hoax would have been a massive PR win for the soviets and a totally devastating,possibly world changing,blow to the US.They had the means and motive to expose a hoax and yet nothing.Is this likely?
swfcocs1 9 months ago
This makes me sick to the stomach knowing that they lied to us! i totally believe it was a hoax 100%!!!!!
Supablonde1 9 months ago
@Supablonde1 Wheres the proof for a hoax? Why didn`t the USSR expose any hoax? It`d have been a huge PR win for the soviets.Why haven`t the 1000s of experts in geology,maths,physics and astronomy who have studied the apollo data,footage and samples exposed any hoax?why haven`t the Chinese,Russian,Indian,Japanese or Indian space agencies exposed it? Is it likely that Nixon pulled off the biggest hoax in history then 5 years later made such a mess of a smaller plot(watergate) that he had to quit?
swfcocs1 9 months ago
@swfcocs1 - I get your point but thats just my opinion and what i believe. The American government has lots of hidden secrets we may never ever find out so you may not know the truth yourself!!!! never put your trust in any man!!!! =)
Supablonde1 9 months ago
@Supablonde1 You`re correct,small conspiracies happen all the time,usually over sex and/or money.It`s the sheer scale of any apollo hoax that makes one impossible.Have you seen the JAXA(Japanese space agency) photos taken recently by their probe of 2 of the apollo landing sites? If not it`s worth 5 minutes of your time to google them! You`re dead right about trust,especially of people in authority.I studied the apollo data when I was younger and trust that,not a govt`s word on it`s own
swfcocs1 9 months ago
@swfcocs1 I will check it out, it sounds interesting. Thank you for your polite reply. =)
Supablonde1 9 months ago
@Supablonde1 No problem.Have you also seen the mythbusters apollo special episode?It`s on utube and is also worth a watch.I hope you find the right(in my humble opinion!)answers from this evidence
All the best.
swfcocs1 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Conspiracy idiots fall into 2 categories:
1) Trying to make a buck
2) Low self-esteem, and therefore must feel like they know something the rest of us don't to feel better about themselves. Fall victim to category #1. Also usually uneducated (i.e. did not pay attention in the hard classes in school).
This goes for Moon Landing hoaxers, the 9/11 hoaxers, etc.
Really can't put it any simpler than that. They basically have no grasp of physics or logical thinking.
TheFACTSRUS 10 months ago
if its so fake send a mars rover to the moon and see if there is a flag.. if so, its true, if not, its fake. simple
RamJim9697 10 months ago
@RamJim9697 Hardly simple.Why would NASA spend billions doing that,knowing full well that the apollo conspiracy theorists would still cry hoax? JAXA has photoed the apollo sites and that`s been denounced as fake.Would the Japanese really help NASA fake it?For most hoaxsters no proof is enough,short of literally going themselves! Surely it is for the hoaxsters to prove their allegations,as in court people dont need to prove their innocence! No real proof in 40+ years.Is that feasible?
swfcocs1 9 months ago
@swfcocs1 I dont think anyone should care if its real or fake. Peronally i think its real, But the point was to learn about the moon, If they fake it, That doesnt help them at all. They need test samples.. Faking it wouldnt help them, they dont care what people think, Only that the job gets done and they learn, So why would it be fake?
RamJim9697 9 months ago
My new Dodge Challenger 400hp hemi gets 19 miles per gallon and we send a rocket 500,000 round trip? I just paid $.4.50 per gallon too.
jimiange 10 months ago
This video is stupid ...
Harvin87 10 months ago
fucking americans
razvy1997 10 months ago
youre stupid
TheVictor240 10 months ago
Those who don't believe it are just jealous.
Robi555666 10 months ago
YES.
amor987654321 10 months ago
i belive they had fly up there but i don't belive that they landed on the moon...if they did this in 1969 when the technology wasn't so developed why they can't do this now in 2011 when the technology is so developed and USA is so powerful that could make everything happene?
you never thought about this?
03kellykelly 10 months ago
@03kellykelly
Because rocket technology is NOT that "developed" as you say, we still face the same problem. We have to use a chemically fueled rocket as big as a mountain to get a tiny payload to the moon that is just barely big enough to land and take off again. Until we come up with a more advanced propulsion system, going to the moon to get another sack of rocks would be stupid.
TheJomogogo 10 months ago
the reason there is no stars is because of light pollution. for example: when its day time, and you look up at the sky, theres no stars because the sun is so bright, and because of there being so many buildings and street lights in a big city at night, you cant see as many stars as you would. plus the flag only moves when the astronauts touch it and the only reason its moves more than usual is because theres no atmosphere. no atmosphere equals no friction.
animationdude56 10 months ago
ppl havent u seen the typhoon fighter ... if thats real then landing on the moon is real
omar390z 10 months ago
see thats what sucks ,,, we dont know if we are knowing the truth or not ...
omar390z 10 months ago
idiots ask all the question instead of learning things its good to ask but you got to read for your self some day and stop being a sheep
tomanyasses 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jenleex The Russians attitude on the US feat w/ the Apollos pretty much sums it up. The Russians basically sucked on their proposed moon landings bcoz of being anti-American ideology, not accepting what works, rushing the construction and planning while US even had hired Von Braun, a Nazi and V2 engineer, in the construction of the rocket that launched the 1st US satellite to space (Jupiter C) and men to orbit (Saturn).
chrissanne14344 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jenleex The Russians attitude on the US feat w/ the Apollos pretty much sums it up. The Russians basically sucked on their proposed moon landings bcoz of being anti-American ideology, not accepting what works, rushing the construction and planning while US even had hired Von Braun, a Nazi and V2 engineer, in the construction of the rocket that launched the 1st US satellite to space (Jupiter C) and men to orbit (Saturn).
chrissanne14344 10 months ago
Jaxa say there is nothing at the landing sites..so that is it .. the USA bilt nuclear bombs, but some years later the USSR did, the same with the jet engine, the big question is this..why has the USSR never been to the moon they may have been a bit behind the USA but 40 years behind ? the USSR only needs to us old 1969 technology to go to the moon so why don't they go and build a moon base there ? and why no other counties China, India, Japan go with old 1969 technolgy ?????
jenleex 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jenleex The Russians attitude on the US feat w/ the Apollos pretty much sums it up. The Russians basically sucked on their proposed moon landings bcoz of being anti-American ideology, not accepting what works, rushing the construction and planning while US even had hired Von Braun, a Nazi and V2 engineer, in the construction of the rocket that launched the 1st US satellite to space (Jupiter C) and men to orbit (Saturn).
l.
chrissanne14344 10 months ago
I think this is the most overwhelming evidence of all, and it can't be denied by anyone - listen:
If NASA wanted to "fool the world", then that must mean the world took for granted that we had to receive the recordings FROM THE MOON - how could we get the live recordings from there if nobody was there to begin with?
BECAUSE THEY WERE IN FACT THERE!
Laurelindo 11 months ago
i really wouldnt be suprised
2001Abas 11 months ago
Why oh why, is it so in vogue to despise America. Leviticus 26:19 (King James Version) 19And I will break the pride of your power; and I will make your heaven as iron, and your earth as brass
attilashrugs 11 months ago
@attilashrugs Keep it in church.
db10001110101 11 months ago
Moon rock?
attilashrugs 11 months ago
maybe you had fly uo there, but never landed!!
PAINKILLER876 1 year ago
aha, the best ever...hahahahaha the soviets did had fun, it is very complicate actually!!
PAINKILLER876 1 year ago
america beat the rest. we won. dont try to fake otherwise
dirtydiana444 1 year ago
never stars in the backgrond even the shityest camra would pick up stars
johnnyoverkill 1 year ago
@johnnyoverkill
Show me this camera. It would be a big development for the photo-industry.
Sam67SG 1 year ago
@johnnyoverkill Wow you need an education. If you dont know why you cant see the stars then you need to look it up because it has been explained retard. Damn you are stupid. How come when you are in a city at night and you look up you cant see stars moron? Damn you are a fucking retard.
db10001110101 11 months ago
@johnnyoverkill the reason theres no stars is because the sun is so bright. when you look up at the sky during the day, theres no stars, are there?
???????????????
animationdude56 10 months ago
@johnnyoverkill the astronauts were on the moon during day time, just like earth, we do not see stars in the day time.
Bonzotriplets1 10 months ago
@johnnyoverkill Go out side with your high-tec camera and take a photo of the night sky.
4FunPlayin 9 months ago in playlist The Moon Did we Land on the Moon?
my grand father worked for nasa during moon landing he told me rockets when into sapce that part is true moon walking was staged funds used for cia opps
johnnyoverkill 1 year ago
Maybe thats why America haven’t gone to the moon since because the video might be different and then America will have to admit it was a HOAX just to win the space race.
iAmBryanski 1 year ago