I don't deny we went to the moon. I just think that there was some other reason for going there than what they said. The scientists who ran nasa wer ex german nazis after all. And the Nazis wer obsessed with aliens. Then all of a sudden "Let's spend lots of money to go to the moon before russia (who got all of the nazis research which mainly consisted of alien stuff then later became obsessed with aliens also) does!"
@meehalee21 No Germans "ran NASA". Some Germans worked for NASA designing rockets, but NASA didn't only send people to space. They did, and do a lot of aircraft research and all kind of research about flying and space exploration. A very few of the staff were Germans.
I can't believe the comments here are polluted with conspiracy theory crap. Folks, lunar satellites have taken pictures of the landing site for Apollo 17. Most of the sites left mirrors at their sites which still reflect to this day. It happened - get over it.
A great deal of preparation and experiment went into getting to the moon.. it's all there, the Mercury & Gemini programs and then Apollo. It wasn't all perfect all the time, but eventually they worked it out and did it.
I just wish NASA had the budget it needed to go back. It'd be nice if we didn't need to spend so much on defence and that money could mostly go to NASA instead. Can you imagine?
@flyerholland These are film cameras, in many cases analogue film is higher quality than today's digital HD. It's because the cameras are compact that the quality is bad.
@LightninLew Television cameras back then were not very compact, something needed for the Apollo missions. A small camera was specially designed for the missions but with technology of the day it had to take a hit in terms of image quality. However, the individual photographs taken by the astronaunts on their 70mm Hasselblads are typically well exposed...and there is your nerd moment of the day!
@jazzclarinet2006 Thanks for your answer, I know it's 6months late but I got blocked from commenting on this video because apparently I'm a crazy conspiracy theorist just because I'm not an expert in film/cameras of the 70s.
@TheHotelMoxa - you are truly stupid. that's the most arrogant, unsubstantiated, bigoted statement i have heard in a long time. when we look at mathematical probabilities as applied to evolution, it is the scientific community that is guilty of religious fanaticism. the great mantra of modern society is "denier". its called asking questions. if you can answer them fine. if not then maybe it didn't happen....
@fowzie777 You won't find many answers to your questions on YouTube, but those answers are out there. You just have to make sure you use reputable sources of information. Those with a "conspiracy theory" driven agenda very rarely (if ever) come from a scientific/engineering background. That should immediately ring an alarm bell for you. Do you really think that relatively unqualified people are going to spot genuine "anomalies" in the Apollo data whilst countless scientists & engineers do not?
people that deny the greatest engineering feat that mankind has ever embarked in are like a weight around societies ankle. to deny that it was done, is to believe it cant be done. but, a group of pilots and engineers, and computer geeks decided it could be done back in the 60's and they built the machine and freakin' did it. so, do some research, and stop believing every conspiraty theory thats out there. we have enough real stuff to worry about.
Well said. They got together and did it. Conspiracy theorists are a weight around the ankles of society. God help us if they ever gain power. I'd hat to live in their world.
keep busy applying to my blocklist, trolls. enjoy your silly troofer agony elsewhere now that we have already new photos even before lro reached its final orbit now leak off and knit another confpirafy variant - chinese zinoinists placed all that stuff later up there just to tease you :P I like the caravan path of a14 best just btw check nasa for lro-images of apollosites five of six is what they snapped already later series will have yet triple better resolution
I wonder how much money was wasted on the Internet before it became a reality. Hmmm... I think the internet may have been started around the time of the Apollo project. I don't know what country you're from SPAG22, but keep watching America. And, forever may you bask in the glow of our tail lights. Cheers!
Not true at all, we need the majority of the country. Without public support, and public out cry for such projects to be done, they never will be done. Right now, the public is more intrested in censoring music, movies, and books and "saving the children" than they are doing anything great.
We need more than 3 people for a moon landing. In order to design the Saturn V and the LEM and everything else that needed to be built, over 400,000 people worked hard for more than 7 years.
Now that NASA is building Orion and Artemis to return man to the moon, tens of thousands of men and women are working hard to design and build the machines. It takes thousands of people to put 3 people on the moon.
The Apollo Astronauts did not get there all by themselves. Not to mention the tax money.
Ravenflight104, you're absolutely right! These astronauts endured immense radiation in the Van Allen belts and since the moon doesn't have a magnetosphere, they were further exposed to more radiation! These astronauts are amazing and very courages!
They got about a regular X-rays ammount of radiation passing through the Van Allen belt. Dont get your info from conspiracy idiots. Its usually wrong.
You heard wrong. They recieved about the same amount of radiation that someone gets in three years living at sea level. or what a nuclear plant worker is allowed in one year. Less than one rem.
Come on America go back to the moon! If you can waste money on the Iraq you can easily waste moon on more moon landings (less people get killed for a start!)
They had a large backback which contained the PLSS, on, which altered thier center of gravity. An attempt at a really high jump by jumping straight up , would have a chance of one tipping over. Armstrong found this when he tried. Landing on the PLSS back, the thing that is keeping you alive, is a BAD thing.
The pressure suit and PLSS mass was about 82kg, as much as the astronaut. Add the suit stiffness under pressure and I'm not surprised they didn't jump higher. But Neil Armstrong did a squat jump up several rungs of the LM ladder at the end of the EVA.
The mass of the backpacks was demonstrated by the forward angle at which they stood to balance.
It's not a cable, it's a VHF blade antenna much like a metal tape measure. We hams actually use tape measure blades on many of our satellites; they make excellent deployable antennas.
How else did they communicate? They're in a vacuum, ya know.
well it's only the same technology that allows spacewalks and they were doing those since gemini 4 with ed white, so you can;t say they didnt have the technology
At Last!!! - Undeniable proof that we went there - it's in the BIBLE. "Job 31:26 - If I beheld the sunlight when it shone or the moon walking in its brightness." See! MOON WALKING in the Bible!! And eveybody knows that the Bible is true, don't we? :-P
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Yes, and at the training center they were making all time somersaults very easilig. A man including equipment weighting 100 Kg would weight 16 Kg on the moon. He could easily walk on the hand and make hops 2 or 3 meters of hight. Again, one more inconsistance with these controversial videos. More over,low gravity gives lower acceleration.On the moon if you jump from 10m to the ground, your speed reaching the ground would be 1,2 m/s. You won't break your legs! (on the earth: 11 m /s = 39,6 Km/h!)
how is that inconsistant though. to me it looks like he's hardly moving his legs and is bouncing. his acceleration due to grav seems much slower than earth. he would have to be connected to an inteligent crane to mimic that.
I think, if he was to bend his legs and leap (like on earth), he would go right up in the air (well vacume). But if they did mess around like that and they slipped (as did happen at one point), they could have damaged their suit.
No, a 10m drop on the moon would give 5.72 m/sec. A 10m drop on the earth would give 14 m/sec. There'd be 6x as much potential energy 10m above the earth than the moon.
Kinetic energy goes as velocity squared. (14/5.72) squared is 6. So a 10m drop on the moon would be like a 10/6 = 1.67m drop on the earth.
something i never understood, is if they are in 0 gravity why dont they just float off the moon? is there some gravity on the moon that stops that from happening?
The gravitational force between two bodies follows an inverse square dependence of the distance between them. It is not linear. There is a rapid fall off of the experienced force as you increase the distance between two bodies.
let me educate you ! Sun's radiation consists of visible radiation (light, about 50%), the other half is near infrared (NIR), and some is ultraviolet part of the spectrum. None of that is shielded with lead, because of the lover energy of the radiaton.
The dentist uses X-ray like you said, which which has to be shielded with lead because of higher energy. (UV:12.4 eV, Xray=124 keV) !!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
yea ok it's not fake, except for one little problem. when I went to the dentist I got an xray and they shielded my gums with a led dental dam, but these guys go to the moon, in what amounts to a big beer can, and have zero lead shielding...hmmm Houston we really do have a problem here!!!
This aint fake..If it were why only know after near;ly forty years.The astronauts risked their own lives going there now they're in their old age,some fuckin' quarterbacks will just accuse them of faking their flights.How about the lift offs at Cape Canaveral,where'd you think they went? This moon hoax is silly!
amazing the incredible moments we all experience in our short time amidst the vastness of it all...wake up and break out of it you pathetic idiots. Its just such a waste of time to think that man didn't walk on the moon. Sad little trips you people must have.
People take footage like this for granted. THIS IS REAL MOON FOOTAGE. This symbolises the power of mankind. This is amazing. Could you imagine really walking on the moon? Wow.
You don't have to wait for VLT. In about a year NASA will send in orbit around the moon a recon spaceship which will take high resolution photos of Apollo remains. The lunarmodule the moon buggy and the flag will be photographed from above.
There are no stars in the sky, but that is an exposure thing. It's pretty easy to take a picture and show a sky with no lights, just uses a super bright light source.
if you look carefully the fine dust settles with out floating, like its in a vacuum. and look at the effects of gravity. Oh shit I think they are on the moon!!!
Its a antenna reflecting light! if it was cable then when he leaned forward then the cable should still pointing up not the same direction as hes leaned.. to those who thinks moon landing were faked, youre wasting youre time. one day u will know!
Countries like China, Japan, Russia are serious about landing Man on the Mooon. Probes are already in the works, and one objective is to confirm all 7 Apollo landing sites. Maybe we really went 1 time and the other 6 were faked. I pray they do find The American flag on the Moon, living astronauts who walked on the Moon are being humiliated & rediculed and not taken serious.
"one objective is to confirm all 7 Apollo landing sites"?
First of all, there were only six Apollo landings. 13 didn't make it. And no country is going to waste hundreds of millions of dollars just to confirm what everyone but a few ignorant conspiracy types already knows.
You were watching real close up the clips? You mean this fuzzy broadcast image? Why don't you go look at the photographs in the archive. They are high resolution 2 1/4 X 2 1/4 Hasselblad images. I'm telling you there are antennae on their back packs that are glinting in the sun and causing vertical streaks in the video image that people HERE are interpreting to be flying wires. Just go look!
Go to the NASA site, Apollo Image Archive, Apollo 17 to see clear images of these guys. In this video you see light glinting off an antenna on the back pack, not a wire. Laying flat on the ground they CAN do a forceful pushup that bounces them up to a standing position with their arms alone since a 200 lb man weighs only 33 pounds on the Moon. Muscles of a grown man, weight of a five year old.
If you go to the NASA site, Apollo Image Gallery, Apollo 17, you can see crystal clear photographs of these guys. You will see that there is an antenna on the top of the back pack. You are seeing light glinting off the antenna, not a wire. In 1/6 Gravity you CAN push your entire rigid body up with one arm since a 200 lb man weighs only 33 lbs. Your weight is far less, but you still have ALL your mass, hence the strange strides. TRY to think beyond your limitations.
Look for the antenna. You can see it here: 0:14, 0:28. At 0:47 cam zooms, the brightness of sunlight on the suit makes camera's auto exposure shut iris down, image grows dark, you can't see antenna. See it again at 1:03. Many nice views of it 1:25 to 1:55 and again from 2:00 to 2:10. Again at 2:23. If some mega rich guy sent a probe and got pictures of the landing site, you would just say they were fake, too.
how long were the EVAs on apollo 17? if anyone knows, amazing footage
CryptWarrior69 2 weeks ago
@CryptWarrior69
1sr: 07:11:53
2nd: 07:36:56
3ird: 07:15:08
Total 22:03:57
lostlyrics 2 weeks ago
Damn ninjas can hardly see their movements as they steal the stars ...
maninhoux 2 weeks ago
@maninhoux
ninjas in white only in antarctica 0:)
lostlyrics 2 weeks ago
Even in '72 I knew that cancelling the Apollo program was a bad idea I wish very much that it had continued. It was a bad call.
Ca1861 2 weeks ago
I don't deny we went to the moon. I just think that there was some other reason for going there than what they said. The scientists who ran nasa wer ex german nazis after all. And the Nazis wer obsessed with aliens. Then all of a sudden "Let's spend lots of money to go to the moon before russia (who got all of the nazis research which mainly consisted of alien stuff then later became obsessed with aliens also) does!"
meehalee21 1 month ago
@meehalee21 *when Russia sacked Berlin
meehalee21 1 month ago
@meehalee21 No Germans "ran NASA". Some Germans worked for NASA designing rockets, but NASA didn't only send people to space. They did, and do a lot of aircraft research and all kind of research about flying and space exploration. A very few of the staff were Germans.
YDDES 4 days ago
@LightninLew because the footage is from the 70's....
PimpMyArteries 6 months ago
I can't believe the comments here are polluted with conspiracy theory crap. Folks, lunar satellites have taken pictures of the landing site for Apollo 17. Most of the sites left mirrors at their sites which still reflect to this day. It happened - get over it.
admiralbob77 7 months ago 11
@admiralbob77 yup. :P
you even see footsteps in the high resulution
ok not single ones, but the trample paths so to
speak. also the japanese probe reported match.
lostlyrics 7 months ago 3
but this is mission are really existence ??
03698765 9 months ago
A great deal of preparation and experiment went into getting to the moon.. it's all there, the Mercury & Gemini programs and then Apollo. It wasn't all perfect all the time, but eventually they worked it out and did it.
I just wish NASA had the budget it needed to go back. It'd be nice if we didn't need to spend so much on defence and that money could mostly go to NASA instead. Can you imagine?
slackologist 10 months ago 2
@LightninLew because its from 1972 and they all had piece of shit camera's.. its not Hd era...
flyerholland 10 months ago
@flyerholland These are film cameras, in many cases analogue film is higher quality than today's digital HD. It's because the cameras are compact that the quality is bad.
TheMrFace93 5 months ago
@LightninLew Television cameras back then were not very compact, something needed for the Apollo missions. A small camera was specially designed for the missions but with technology of the day it had to take a hit in terms of image quality. However, the individual photographs taken by the astronaunts on their 70mm Hasselblads are typically well exposed...and there is your nerd moment of the day!
jazzclarinet2006 11 months ago
@jazzclarinet2006 Thanks for your answer, I know it's 6months late but I got blocked from commenting on this video because apparently I'm a crazy conspiracy theorist just because I'm not an expert in film/cameras of the 70s.
TheMrFace93 5 months ago
@LightninLew
a conspiracy. I planned that longhanded so mine would peak out with such a galacto*bleeeep*great quality.yeah
lostlyrics 11 months ago
Do the Moonwalk!!!!!!
11AMERICANO11 11 months ago
Go land on Mars ffs..(2030 o' wtf!)..
11AMERICANO11 11 months ago
America's heyday...too bad we haven't been back since 1971 or 2.
kevinusma 1 year ago
go to the moon ... the routine
dfdsffdfdfdfdsfsdfsd 1 year ago
Is this real life?
andy92811 1 year ago 5
@andy92811 It was really live.
lostlyrics 1 year ago 14
@andy92811 No. You're dreaming. . . ! WAKE UP!
I'm just messing with you, it's all real. :)
PowerOfMontage 9 months ago
@andy92811 Okay now... okay now... I have two fingers
Hairysteed 7 months ago
We have only four astronauts/kosmonauts and from that one was on the Moon. :-)
SpacewolfCZ 1 year ago 3
@SpacewolfCZ ahoj !
but mooning does not count. :P
lostlyrics 1 year ago 4
@lostlyrics
You know, Eugene Cernan in czech is Ondřej Čerňan. :-)
SpacewolfCZ 1 year ago
@SpacewolfCZ yeah :P as erika
is pronounced ježika in hungarian. and?
eugene's anchestors were from slovakia.
lostlyrics 1 year ago 4
the people who deny that mankind never went to the moon are mostly religious fanatics who see science and astonomy as the work of HaSatan
TheHotelMoxa 1 year ago
@TheHotelMoxa
some people still wonder why usa leads only
at sabotage, espionage and destruction yet !
while the consequences of homeschooling
and similar child-abuse seem quite obvious.
lostlyrics 1 year ago 3
@TheHotelMoxa - you are truly stupid. that's the most arrogant, unsubstantiated, bigoted statement i have heard in a long time. when we look at mathematical probabilities as applied to evolution, it is the scientific community that is guilty of religious fanaticism. the great mantra of modern society is "denier". its called asking questions. if you can answer them fine. if not then maybe it didn't happen....
fowzie777 1 year ago
@fowzie777 You won't find many answers to your questions on YouTube, but those answers are out there. You just have to make sure you use reputable sources of information. Those with a "conspiracy theory" driven agenda very rarely (if ever) come from a scientific/engineering background. That should immediately ring an alarm bell for you. Do you really think that relatively unqualified people are going to spot genuine "anomalies" in the Apollo data whilst countless scientists & engineers do not?
eventcone 1 year ago 5
i love Gene Cernan. he's my favorite Navy astronaut
TracyAndersonFoxhunt 1 year ago
I am looking forward to constellation! I love it! :-)
Hanomag1996 2 years ago 6
So was I.
Kind of a bummer...
curea229 2 years ago 5
wow!!!!
vertoleti4ek 2 years ago 8
people that deny the greatest engineering feat that mankind has ever embarked in are like a weight around societies ankle. to deny that it was done, is to believe it cant be done. but, a group of pilots and engineers, and computer geeks decided it could be done back in the 60's and they built the machine and freakin' did it. so, do some research, and stop believing every conspiraty theory thats out there. we have enough real stuff to worry about.
000coffinhead000 2 years ago 43
@000coffinhead000
Well said. They got together and did it. Conspiracy theorists are a weight around the ankles of society. God help us if they ever gain power. I'd hat to live in their world.
lukequixotesanjose 1 year ago 2
@lukequixotesanjose= They never will. They can't even move out of their mother's basement.
vigo894 10 months ago
@vigo894
LOL. Most of them probably can't find the way out of their mother's basement.
lukequixotesanjose 10 months ago
Never seen this footage before. And that is something, because I've seen hundreds already..!
Thanks for uploading and keep on going.
Rob260259 2 years ago 7
lostlyrics 2 years ago 8
it looks like he lost something at 1.03, dropped by mistake... :)
solwretep 2 years ago
cool!
JACINTO9002 2 years ago
We need to go to there, lol.
abrelosojos18 2 years ago
i want to go to the moon too
JanAshleyTisdaleFan 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
I wonder how much money was wasted on the Internet before it became a reality. Hmmm... I think the internet may have been started around the time of the Apollo project. I don't know what country you're from SPAG22, but keep watching America. And, forever may you bask in the glow of our tail lights. Cheers!
MusiKritique 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Gee whiz, SPAG, You must be right. Happy ?
Ravenflight104 3 years ago
No I'm not happy, we're not going back to the moon for years.
SPAG22 3 years ago 2
Going to the moon requires courage, character and resolve. Frankly, these qualities are quickly becoming scarce.
Ravenflight104 3 years ago 7
Yeah but we only need 3 people out of six billion, the odds are good.
SPAG22 3 years ago 3
Not true at all, we need the majority of the country. Without public support, and public out cry for such projects to be done, they never will be done. Right now, the public is more intrested in censoring music, movies, and books and "saving the children" than they are doing anything great.
Polybun 2 years ago 4
I mean we only need 3 people to carry out the moon landing.
Public opinion counts for nothing especially in a democracy.
SPAG22 2 years ago
We need more than 3 people for a moon landing. In order to design the Saturn V and the LEM and everything else that needed to be built, over 400,000 people worked hard for more than 7 years.
Now that NASA is building Orion and Artemis to return man to the moon, tens of thousands of men and women are working hard to design and build the machines. It takes thousands of people to put 3 people on the moon.
The Apollo Astronauts did not get there all by themselves. Not to mention the tax money.
osallent 2 years ago 2
Ravenflight104, you're absolutely right! These astronauts endured immense radiation in the Van Allen belts and since the moon doesn't have a magnetosphere, they were further exposed to more radiation! These astronauts are amazing and very courages!
saltydog78 2 years ago
The radiation belts are small, and around the earth, not the moon. Get your facts straight,
ophello 2 years ago
They got about a regular X-rays ammount of radiation passing through the Van Allen belt. Dont get your info from conspiracy idiots. Its usually wrong.
211123436 2 years ago 7
I heard on NPR today in an interview that the astronauts are exposed to about 27,000 X-Rays worth of radiation.
Ultranothing 2 years ago
You heard wrong. They recieved about the same amount of radiation that someone gets in three years living at sea level. or what a nuclear plant worker is allowed in one year. Less than one rem.
TheJomogogo 2 years ago 2
They were also exposed to masses of Z particles while in space and to this day they still are unsure of the long term damage.
That still should not stop us going back though
markyballack 2 years ago 9
Be that as it may, Buzz Aldrin is a very old man who seems to be in quite good health!
cmomofilm 2 years ago 5
Come on America go back to the moon! If you can waste money on the Iraq you can easily waste moon on more moon landings (less people get killed for a start!)
SPAG22 3 years ago 33
They had a large backback which contained the PLSS, on, which altered thier center of gravity. An attempt at a really high jump by jumping straight up , would have a chance of one tipping over. Armstrong found this when he tried. Landing on the PLSS back, the thing that is keeping you alive, is a BAD thing.
loperspest 3 years ago 7
The pressure suit and PLSS mass was about 82kg, as much as the astronaut. Add the suit stiffness under pressure and I'm not surprised they didn't jump higher. But Neil Armstrong did a squat jump up several rungs of the LM ladder at the end of the EVA.
The mass of the backpacks was demonstrated by the forward angle at which they stood to balance.
philkarn 3 years ago 3
It's not a cable, it's a VHF blade antenna much like a metal tape measure. We hams actually use tape measure blades on many of our satellites; they make excellent deployable antennas.
How else did they communicate? They're in a vacuum, ya know.
philkarn 3 years ago 2
well it's only the same technology that allows spacewalks and they were doing those since gemini 4 with ed white, so you can;t say they didnt have the technology
l3inaryl3urnout 3 years ago 4
come on, over many thousand of people were involved in this. Every part of apollo was working during the production. Offcourse we had the technology.
joachim2464 3 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
At Last!!! - Undeniable proof that we went there - it's in the BIBLE. "Job 31:26 - If I beheld the sunlight when it shone or the moon walking in its brightness." See! MOON WALKING in the Bible!! And eveybody knows that the Bible is true, don't we? :-P
bithot2nite 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yes, and at the training center they were making all time somersaults very easilig. A man including equipment weighting 100 Kg would weight 16 Kg on the moon. He could easily walk on the hand and make hops 2 or 3 meters of hight. Again, one more inconsistance with these controversial videos. More over,low gravity gives lower acceleration.On the moon if you jump from 10m to the ground, your speed reaching the ground would be 1,2 m/s. You won't break your legs! (on the earth: 11 m /s = 39,6 Km/h!)
degrangier 3 years ago
how is that inconsistant though. to me it looks like he's hardly moving his legs and is bouncing. his acceleration due to grav seems much slower than earth. he would have to be connected to an inteligent crane to mimic that.
I think, if he was to bend his legs and leap (like on earth), he would go right up in the air (well vacume). But if they did mess around like that and they slipped (as did happen at one point), they could have damaged their suit.
geoffart 3 years ago
head a suit and a backpack on wich was over 40 kilos in weight so he would weigh 22 - 25 kilos on the moon.
joachim2464 3 years ago
No, a 10m drop on the moon would give 5.72 m/sec. A 10m drop on the earth would give 14 m/sec. There'd be 6x as much potential energy 10m above the earth than the moon.
Kinetic energy goes as velocity squared. (14/5.72) squared is 6. So a 10m drop on the moon would be like a 10/6 = 1.67m drop on the earth.
philkarn 3 years ago
something i never understood, is if they are in 0 gravity why dont they just float off the moon? is there some gravity on the moon that stops that from happening?
abuwadie3 3 years ago
it's not zerograv, the moon got 1/6 of
earth gravitional force - means a naked
male athlet could high-jump about 8.20 meters
(center of gravity in a 6ft body, about 1 m up
so if your champ makes 2.20 m in sports, that is
actually just hieving the center of gravity by 1.20 m )
lostlyrics 3 years ago 2
They are experiencing 1/6 gravity on the moon. While in orbit or travelling to and from a planet, they would experience weightlessness.
akatsuki2589 3 years ago
The gravitational force between two bodies follows an inverse square dependence of the distance between them. It is not linear. There is a rapid fall off of the experienced force as you increase the distance between two bodies.
stanante 3 years ago
offcourse the moon has gravity 1/6 of the earths gravity.
joachim2464 3 years ago
i think montain
DrJobs 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Look at 00:41. Are those clouds?
MoonShmoon 3 years ago
no need to look.
on the moon there are no clouds.
lostlyrics 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I just goofing. It is a chem trail from a jet.
I am still kidding. Go to 00:41 and look for yourself.
MoonShmoon 3 years ago
i hope you understand the energy difference and ionization leves. Hence the difference in shielding
drazen21 3 years ago
let me educate you ! Sun's radiation consists of visible radiation (light, about 50%), the other half is near infrared (NIR), and some is ultraviolet part of the spectrum. None of that is shielded with lead, because of the lover energy of the radiaton.
The dentist uses X-ray like you said, which which has to be shielded with lead because of higher energy. (UV:12.4 eV, Xray=124 keV) !!!
drazen21 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yea ok it's not fake, except for one little problem. when I went to the dentist I got an xray and they shielded my gums with a led dental dam, but these guys go to the moon, in what amounts to a big beer can, and have zero lead shielding...hmmm Houston we really do have a problem here!!!
BlacKnightRising 4 years ago
This aint fake..If it were why only know after near;ly forty years.The astronauts risked their own lives going there now they're in their old age,some fuckin' quarterbacks will just accuse them of faking their flights.How about the lift offs at Cape Canaveral,where'd you think they went? This moon hoax is silly!
kva1978 4 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
They flew around in orbit silly.
3dog9ty 3 years ago
This Is Real They were on the Moon Period Awesome Indeed.
AscendentInLeo 4 years ago 3
Cernan was cool, but Schmitt was just the ticket!
mason104 4 years ago
amazing the incredible moments we all experience in our short time amidst the vastness of it all...wake up and break out of it you pathetic idiots. Its just such a waste of time to think that man didn't walk on the moon. Sad little trips you people must have.
DJDavidColin 4 years ago
the world is fed up with ppl thinking they're so smart.
saigonpunkid 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I fyou ever drive through utah..there are plenty of moon sites...
xpez 4 years ago
I f you ever drive through Utah..there are plenty of moon sites...
I don't know why people spammed this...its true Utah has some places that look like the moon.
Of course i am not saying the moon landing was a hoax...
xpez 3 years ago
I wish I could be on the moon. Then I could find out i its really made of cheese.
tracyterry 4 years ago
try key word harry caray
axll2 4 years ago
People take footage like this for granted. THIS IS REAL MOON FOOTAGE. This symbolises the power of mankind. This is amazing. Could you imagine really walking on the moon? Wow.
bigboi2929 4 years ago 3
You don't have to wait for VLT. In about a year NASA will send in orbit around the moon a recon spaceship which will take high resolution photos of Apollo remains. The lunarmodule the moon buggy and the flag will be photographed from above.
paratirisi 4 years ago 3
I hear you - as dubya heard the chinese
rushing in with engines blarring - hehehe.
especially from germany it was a pain watch
how the nasa degenerated to eager sycophants
after von Braun, just ruled by an uninspired
and careless military giving a flying stuff
on human lives and future technologies ... ~*~
lostlyrics 4 years ago
ppl will just claim its a fake...
joiz303989 4 years ago
VLT won't be able to spot the descent stage of the lem; this would need a 200m diameter telescop.
666kiki666 5 years ago
I recommend you review its features. it cAn. ~*~
lostlyrics 5 years ago
The best mission...strolling on the Moon one day...
homelesshater 5 years ago
Cool, only way to see the stars was is go on the oppsites side from the lighted side.
hobo42t 5 years ago
There are no stars in the sky, but that is an exposure thing. It's pretty easy to take a picture and show a sky with no lights, just uses a super bright light source.
cavy999999 5 years ago
if you look carefully the fine dust settles with out floating, like its in a vacuum. and look at the effects of gravity. Oh shit I think they are on the moon!!!
acerkiwi 5 years ago
I recommend to wait 10 years at least, by then the
European VLT will have reached a solution sufficient
to SEE the left under-carriages of the lunar moduls ~*~
lostlyrics 5 years ago
Its a antenna reflecting light! if it was cable then when he leaned forward then the cable should still pointing up not the same direction as hes leaned.. to those who thinks moon landing were faked, youre wasting youre time. one day u will know!
xXPersianxAlienXx 5 years ago
when the eiropean VLT is complete (in ten years) it
will have a resolution to spot the undercarriage of LEMs
I think some photos of the first missions are faked, but
can't believe that observatories on the whole world
could be fooled with all the apollo communication ~*~
lostlyrics 5 years ago
Countries like China, Japan, Russia are serious about landing Man on the Mooon. Probes are already in the works, and one objective is to confirm all 7 Apollo landing sites. Maybe we really went 1 time and the other 6 were faked. I pray they do find The American flag on the Moon, living astronauts who walked on the Moon are being humiliated & rediculed and not taken serious.
asempreduro 5 years ago
"one objective is to confirm all 7 Apollo landing sites"?
First of all, there were only six Apollo landings. 13 didn't make it. And no country is going to waste hundreds of millions of dollars just to confirm what everyone but a few ignorant conspiracy types already knows.
philkarn 3 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wasting hundreds of millions of dollars is what America does best!
SPAG22 3 years ago
You were watching real close up the clips? You mean this fuzzy broadcast image? Why don't you go look at the photographs in the archive. They are high resolution 2 1/4 X 2 1/4 Hasselblad images. I'm telling you there are antennae on their back packs that are glinting in the sun and causing vertical streaks in the video image that people HERE are interpreting to be flying wires. Just go look!
satweavers 5 years ago 2
Go to the NASA site, Apollo Image Archive, Apollo 17 to see clear images of these guys. In this video you see light glinting off an antenna on the back pack, not a wire. Laying flat on the ground they CAN do a forceful pushup that bounces them up to a standing position with their arms alone since a 200 lb man weighs only 33 pounds on the Moon. Muscles of a grown man, weight of a five year old.
satweavers 5 years ago
If you go to the NASA site, Apollo Image Gallery, Apollo 17, you can see crystal clear photographs of these guys. You will see that there is an antenna on the top of the back pack. You are seeing light glinting off the antenna, not a wire. In 1/6 Gravity you CAN push your entire rigid body up with one arm since a 200 lb man weighs only 33 lbs. Your weight is far less, but you still have ALL your mass, hence the strange strides. TRY to think beyond your limitations.
satweavers 5 years ago
Look for the antenna. You can see it here: 0:14, 0:28. At 0:47 cam zooms, the brightness of sunlight on the suit makes camera's auto exposure shut iris down, image grows dark, you can't see antenna. See it again at 1:03. Many nice views of it 1:25 to 1:55 and again from 2:00 to 2:10. Again at 2:23. If some mega rich guy sent a probe and got pictures of the landing site, you would just say they were fake, too.
satweavers 5 years ago 2
the equipment weighs quite a few pounds also :P
~*~
lostlyrics 5 years ago
that was cool
Nemesis6048 5 years ago
me too brave souls very very cool...
iirobotics 5 years ago
Great video! Would like to be able to see all of the EVA's from the moon.
talondrivert38 5 years ago