Bien que, du regard de l'agriculteur, j'ai du mal à accepter l'idée d'une agriculture verticale, le style architecturale de la tour n'en reste pas moins agréable à regarder. Même si l'idée d'une production agraire, même de maraîchage est à proscrire dans se genre d'environnement (qui ne sera pas suffisant à une production optimale), l'idée de faire entrer la végétation en architecture reste néanmoins intéressante.
Thanks for your great, green idea for our world. In my opinion, there is possibility to research 'vertical fluid' farm too. This system may use fast-growing, small sea weeds, algae, etc.
L'atelier soa fait vraiment des projets pas mal pour une équipe encore pas trop connue. J'aime beaucoup le principe et la gueule de cette tour, même si les 2 éoliennes sur le toit dénotent un peu avec l'aspect général du projet.
Another thought the extra energy could be used to blast classical music on every floor. You know the studies that were done on classical music effects plant growth positively. Well that would be just great wouldn't it!
Classical music all day would make me go nuts. Not that i dislike it, i just dont wanna be subjected to it all damn day.
It has been proven to make people more docile and submissive, in office buildings in japan they use "muzak" and classical to keep the employees stress levels down like an "audio-prozak" but has also been known to cause anxiety and mental instability problems...
could you imagine society after 48 hours of hearing nothing but "safety dance".. the world would eat itself
Maybe the outer walls (which are already dark in color) can be used to install solar panels, which could power the flourescent grow lights inside! It's perfect, literally direct conversion sunlight --> growlight. THen, we don't need wind towers on top. But, it would require cost efficiency so we need some cheaper technology. I'm sure it's out there, it just has to be subsidized!
love to see this happen. our current method of agriculture is not efficient, and unsustainable. not to mention it does quite a bit of damage to the environment.
I really love this idea, but skyscrapers cost $47 a sq foot and agricultural land cost $6 to $7 a sq foot. The gap would have to closed by cheaper construction costs (robotics perhaps) saving on transport and growing to order with no waste. Love to see it happen.
How little you have searched, google" Wind Powered Rotating Skyscraper" and learn there is a way to have silent wind producing rotating skyscrapers and then they can follow the sun to grow food.
they forgot to put in the "thud thud thud thud"of the wind turbines inside the building - because it would definitely be there and just as loud if not louder than outside, they would shake the entire bulding - plus wind drag adds to building strain.
It would have to be harvested by hand, which, while seemingly slower and bad, is a good thing. First, it would generate jobs very rapidly; second, it would basically eliminate fossil fuel used by harvesting equipment, and, third, because of its vertical shape, it could be built INSIDE of a city, meaning the food could be used for that city, making it fresher, and, also eliminating (to an extent) the use of gas for transport. Not to mention it could be controlled, meaning no insects.
That's pretty cool. Unfortunately, you can't just buy some land from present users, or homestead some unused land, and build something like that. That would be too easy. No, instead, the political class demands a cut, hence zoning and all manner of other construction-related regulations, which will triple costs and make sure only the already-wealthy and well-connected get to turn a profit. People will starve while the builders are still trying to scrounge up cash for kickbacks.
I dont know what to think about that... Is this a dream or a nightmare?
djbenjj 1 month ago
Great Stuff but.... terrible soud effects!
guir0 3 months ago
Bien que, du regard de l'agriculteur, j'ai du mal à accepter l'idée d'une agriculture verticale, le style architecturale de la tour n'en reste pas moins agréable à regarder. Même si l'idée d'une production agraire, même de maraîchage est à proscrire dans se genre d'environnement (qui ne sera pas suffisant à une production optimale), l'idée de faire entrer la végétation en architecture reste néanmoins intéressante.
adrien25610 1 year ago
I am wondering about the air quality that these plants will be getting. All the pollutants from the city. =\
lilsunnycloud 1 year ago
Thanks for your great, green idea for our world. In my opinion, there is possibility to research 'vertical fluid' farm too. This system may use fast-growing, small sea weeds, algae, etc.
WullopPornruangwong 1 year ago
L'atelier soa fait vraiment des projets pas mal pour une équipe encore pas trop connue. J'aime beaucoup le principe et la gueule de cette tour, même si les 2 éoliennes sur le toit dénotent un peu avec l'aspect général du projet.
chenoir 1 year ago
what abgout animals like cows
PUNKDUDE1991 1 year ago
human is getting smarter n smarter
flame3dragon 1 year ago
@flame3dragon But grammar are get badder
jeffsandychelsea 1 year ago
nice!
denz1818 1 year ago
Another thought the extra energy could be used to blast classical music on every floor. You know the studies that were done on classical music effects plant growth positively. Well that would be just great wouldn't it!
DancesWithLlamas 2 years ago
Classical music all day would make me go nuts. Not that i dislike it, i just dont wanna be subjected to it all damn day.
It has been proven to make people more docile and submissive, in office buildings in japan they use "muzak" and classical to keep the employees stress levels down like an "audio-prozak" but has also been known to cause anxiety and mental instability problems...
could you imagine society after 48 hours of hearing nothing but "safety dance".. the world would eat itself
unclesonnyonutube 1 year ago
Maybe the outer walls (which are already dark in color) can be used to install solar panels, which could power the flourescent grow lights inside! It's perfect, literally direct conversion sunlight --> growlight. THen, we don't need wind towers on top. But, it would require cost efficiency so we need some cheaper technology. I'm sure it's out there, it just has to be subsidized!
DancesWithLlamas 2 years ago
love to see this happen. our current method of agriculture is not efficient, and unsustainable. not to mention it does quite a bit of damage to the environment.
id like to see vertical farms build.
curingaging00 2 years ago
I really love this idea, but skyscrapers cost $47 a sq foot and agricultural land cost $6 to $7 a sq foot. The gap would have to closed by cheaper construction costs (robotics perhaps) saving on transport and growing to order with no waste. Love to see it happen.
ohgreatwiseone 2 years ago
How little you have searched, google" Wind Powered Rotating Skyscraper" and learn there is a way to have silent wind producing rotating skyscrapers and then they can follow the sun to grow food.
ssssaaafff 2 years ago
they forgot to put in the "thud thud thud thud"of the wind turbines inside the building - because it would definitely be there and just as loud if not louder than outside, they would shake the entire bulding - plus wind drag adds to building strain.
jeremyhillaryboobphd 2 years ago
wind power stations so close to people are causing a high noise and magnetical field.. but concept is green:)
mityaandco 2 years ago
Hawaii!
NeoAltPower 2 years ago
Something we should have done a long time ago. Along with zero point energy, and EV's / water powered cars.
litetheory 2 years ago
I saw this video to the site eco-tower(dot)fr. Maybe the original
pierressssss 2 years ago
welcome to sci fi future realized in your life
all thanks to the evolving, exponential complexities of computing
pelagicdivision 3 years ago
it's great! and i am writing a paper on it :)
bahamadama 3 years ago
This is being built in France, it's more then just an idea. It's reality.
VGoDzB 3 years ago 11
can u link me abt it plz
tamilmannan 3 years ago
link plz
tamilmannan 3 years ago
lnk plz?
turkeyno18 2 years ago
@VGoDzB link please
professorcuddlecore 1 year ago
i have this for my thesis next year. hehe :p
tjos86 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't see this being practical. I could however see this being made as an attraction. Honestly how do you harvest something like that.
I this is nothing but an artistic conception to stimulate out of the box thinking.
mrmooge88 3 years ago
you should try going to the site verticalfarm(dot)com. the site explains how this system of farming is more practical during the long run.
tjos86 3 years ago 3
It would have to be harvested by hand, which, while seemingly slower and bad, is a good thing. First, it would generate jobs very rapidly; second, it would basically eliminate fossil fuel used by harvesting equipment, and, third, because of its vertical shape, it could be built INSIDE of a city, meaning the food could be used for that city, making it fresher, and, also eliminating (to an extent) the use of gas for transport. Not to mention it could be controlled, meaning no insects.
fenrir7139 3 years ago 10
That's pretty cool. Unfortunately, you can't just buy some land from present users, or homestead some unused land, and build something like that. That would be too easy. No, instead, the political class demands a cut, hence zoning and all manner of other construction-related regulations, which will triple costs and make sure only the already-wealthy and well-connected get to turn a profit. People will starve while the builders are still trying to scrounge up cash for kickbacks.
Libertarian333 3 years ago
Incredible.
mic180 3 years ago
Reminds me of the arcologies in SimCity 2000! Wonderful idea though.
jnguyen327 3 years ago 2