this is actually an extremely decent game i can't believe it. its much greater than cod4. i have basically reached the second prestige ! i am as a result proud. acquired the game just yesterday evening out of mw2forfreeZinfo (replace Z with . ) however , im witout a doubt wooping most people!
ACR is POSITIVELY the most effective gun in the video game. Each and every time I run a S&D on it, I get the Nuke, and light up absolutely everyone. I'm actually playing on the working steam edition i downloaded from codmw2freedlYcom (replace Y with . ) . It is very seriously a awesome game, in case you have not tried it yet, you MUST go download it In addition to this!
great it gets played a lot at the weekends with my dad he is incredibly good at it. I got the game absolutely free for my sony ps3 from here: 115 games. com they have hundreds I couldnt beleive that they are all free I must say 2:15 2 3:45 was rad
i have a wonderful fact for everyone. that you are able to have this game for freely available at "ps3bigskydownload" - just open google and enter "ps3bigskydownload". click 1st link and you'll be there. expect others value it.
you can download ps3 video games for free. Google "ps3 quick download" - click the first link. I downloaded tons of games and it's and they are exceptional! There are ton's of ps3 games on the "ps3 quick download" website!!
i dont like this game but i am 5th prestige with a kill ratio of 6.34 add me on Mohamed-doom on ps3 if u wanna play me 1 v 1. ( i doubt you will win )
i'm quite happy they took it back to ww2 for the time being. I truely enjoyed no. 4 but if treyarch made cod 5 in modern times and then iw ofcourse followed it through with modern warfare 2, i think rants will just start up saying that modern settings is boring and then they might make cod 7 that dreaded sci fi game we though 6 might become
im thinking about getting this game for ps3. i own call of duty 4 modern warfare and i really liked it my favourite lvl as the one calle all ghilled up. Im youst wondering if this game is the same good as the 4th one i mean is it almost the same youst that it is in ww2 and i heard that the story in waw is more hardcore than the 4th one. so is this a good game to buy?
I don't think the game is necessarily as good as Modern Warfare, but given you loved that, I think you'd enjoy WaW. The game's engine is more or less a copy and paste of the 4 engine, so the game controls well and mostly plays well. Is it more intense though? You could say that, but only because that particular war time period was extremely brutal, and the game spares nothing to show that. :)
thank you for the hellp i have played earlier ww2 games both in the call of duty and medal of honor serie so you could say i really like ww2 history and games, but i buyed waw today im gonna play it soon. i see you later.
i have call of duty world at war for ps2 and its differant and im thinking of getting it for ps3 but if its the same i dont really want to buy it can you tell me if the one your playing is a ps3 version
They're not the same. The video here can be considered the PS3 or Xbox 360 versions, as they're essentially the same. There may be small graphical differences, but what you see here is what you'd see on PS3.
u must read this. once u have started there is no turning back. a little 10 year old girl was raped and murderded in 1945. her body was not found until 1947. then a boy last week read this and did not copy and paste this message. the dead girl appeared in his room haunting him and killed him. if you do not copy and paste this onto 10 vidoes in 30 minutes the dead girl will apear in your room tonight and haunt you and kill you. well you better start to copy and paste to be saved
Oh for sure, it's painfully obvious that Activision is using the studios like this. Treyarch used the CoD4 engine to make sure World at War played great, while adding their own unique content and flair to it...and now it's IW's turn to do less work and focus on what they do best :)
Haha, I suppose that's one way of looking at it. But just because World at War used a lot of the development assets from Modern Warfare doesn't mean it's an 'expansion' per se ;) I understand where you're coming from though.
Well you really could've just said different time period, and that would've taken into account everything you listed without all the extra typing haha ;) But yeah, this is a great game, and hopefully the last time we revisit the bloody war, heh.
The news may have arisen on MTV, but it's been known for a few weeks now that IW is indeed developing a follow-up to their 10 million smash hit last year.
You'll have to forgive me. I don't completely understand what you're trying to ask, and I didn't want to say anything in response and sound stupid as a result :)
I'm actually aware of that, but for whatever reason it didn't roll of my tongue like that as I was saying it, and didn't notice afterwards. Oh well, I can't be perfect ;) Thanks for noticing though!
That's both and easy and extremely difficult question haha. On one hand, I would spare no thought to recommending both, as they're both awesome games. Obviously the two key aspects that differentiate them are the war-time settings (modern/WWII), and the weapon choice (modern/WWII). Catching my drift? Since I don't know your tastes, I don't want to point out one over the other...know what I mean?
i have played both, i prefer World at War over CoD 4, but i sometimes wish I could use the new guns on the WWII game, lol.... another plus to WaW is the Nazi Zombie game at the end... it's like a whole other game in itself,lol.
I find Modern Warfare to be the better game (obviously), but each have incredibly fun moments, no doubt about that. Nazi Zombies is a great distraction too, but not for more than two or three successive sessions really.
We don't know anything about Call of Duty 6 other than the fact that the franchise is back in Infinity Ward's hands. But of course as soon as any details surface, we'll be all over them :)
Well for one, I would avoid Kane & Lynch really, the game to me is worthwhile to rent and nothing else.
World at War, well, if you enjoyed Modern Warfare, you'd likely enjoy this.
Saints Row 2 - If you like sandbox games, you could like this. (We have a video review for this one courtesy of Jarrod.)
Far Cry 2 - It's a free roaming/FPS hybrid that has a lot to offer. It has nothing to do with the other games in the series, so that may be right up your alley.
Boy, that's a really tough call man. World at War is really as long as you make it to be. The campaign is about 8 hours or so depending on the difficult you play on...and then there's the online co-op and competitive. I still play Modern Warfare to this day, which speaks for that game's value.
Dead Space is also a quality game, just not as value-driven because there's no multiplayer or anything.
It's really up to you, sorry I couldn't help more.
Heh, well imagine that, my years of taking spanish classes in high school have helped pay off, because I understood every word of that ;) Unfortunately I can't exactly respond in kind XD
It's a little tough to judge graphics betweten Modern Warfare and World at War because of the distinctly different environments. Plus the compression YouTube did to the video makes the footage a tad blurry, so you may want to see the game for yourself before you judge too much ;)
Excellent review that helped sell me on the game. I wonder though how high the score would have been raised had the A.I. in campaign been stellar instead of subpar?
Well first off, thanks for the kind response sir, I certainly appreciate it :)
As for the AI, that's a great question. I probably would've boosted the score a few points had your fellow soldiers and the enemy been smarter...but how much, I couldn't really say ;)
Plz!! all u who subscribed to dis vid add me on ps3 my gamertag redassassin119
Shiraazmehmood257 1 week ago
this is actually an extremely decent game i can't believe it. its much greater than cod4. i have basically reached the second prestige ! i am as a result proud. acquired the game just yesterday evening out of mw2forfreeZinfo (replace Z with . ) however , im witout a doubt wooping most people!
ashentcag 1 year ago
ACR is POSITIVELY the most effective gun in the video game. Each and every time I run a S&D on it, I get the Nuke, and light up absolutely everyone. I'm actually playing on the working steam edition i downloaded from codmw2freedlYcom (replace Y with . ) . It is very seriously a awesome game, in case you have not tried it yet, you MUST go download it In addition to this!
sundayore28 1 year ago
Game is awesome :D :D :D
We have played it on ps2 & became a fan of cod : waw awesome graphics , sound , objectives
If we have to give a rating to it we would have give it 11/10
& also justin this is an nice video !!! Keeep Itttt Upppp !!!
techfacers 1 year ago
Well constructed review, definitely considering this game.
Guitromix 1 year ago
I like your style of reviewing games. Ima buy this since its 30 bucks, cuz I really wana play zombies =D
thebourneman 1 year ago
great it gets played a lot at the weekends with my dad he is incredibly good at it. I got the game absolutely free for my sony ps3 from here: 115 games. com they have hundreds I couldnt beleive that they are all free I must say 2:15 2 3:45 was rad
scullydeguzman 1 year ago
i have a wonderful fact for everyone. that you are able to have this game for freely available at "ps3bigskydownload" - just open google and enter "ps3bigskydownload". click 1st link and you'll be there. expect others value it.
DaleClarki 1 year ago
Are you playing on easy campaign?
Omagu7485 2 years ago
you can download ps3 video games for free. Google "ps3 quick download" - click the first link. I downloaded tons of games and it's and they are exceptional! There are ton's of ps3 games on the "ps3 quick download" website!!
Danbyrnsful 2 years ago
the graphics on console fail so bad
ki11joy92 2 years ago
@ki11joy92 your no life is a faill
darthclash122 1 year ago
@darthclash122 that still dont mean that the graphics are bad.
ki11joy92 1 year ago
I love nazies and the flamethrower is okay but besides that amazing review!!!!!
7xxDodgeballxx7 2 years ago
Great review!
NordicBlondeBeauty 2 years ago
I appreciate it :)
ProjectCOE 2 years ago
This was a great review dude, you pretty much covered everything. Ignore the hate!
KamranAliV1 2 years ago 3
Glad you liked it, thanks a lot :) Don't worry though, I never let negative comments affect me ;)
ProjectCOE 2 years ago
i dont like this game but i am 5th prestige with a kill ratio of 6.34 add me on Mohamed-doom on ps3 if u wanna play me 1 v 1. ( i doubt you will win )
manunited345 2 years ago
you are extremely wierd
worldbattle39 2 years ago 2
i'm quite happy they took it back to ww2 for the time being. I truely enjoyed no. 4 but if treyarch made cod 5 in modern times and then iw ofcourse followed it through with modern warfare 2, i think rants will just start up saying that modern settings is boring and then they might make cod 7 that dreaded sci fi game we though 6 might become
SirTezek 2 years ago 2
im thinking about getting this game for ps3. i own call of duty 4 modern warfare and i really liked it my favourite lvl as the one calle all ghilled up. Im youst wondering if this game is the same good as the 4th one i mean is it almost the same youst that it is in ww2 and i heard that the story in waw is more hardcore than the 4th one. so is this a good game to buy?
guitargamer73568 3 years ago
I don't think the game is necessarily as good as Modern Warfare, but given you loved that, I think you'd enjoy WaW. The game's engine is more or less a copy and paste of the 4 engine, so the game controls well and mostly plays well. Is it more intense though? You could say that, but only because that particular war time period was extremely brutal, and the game spares nothing to show that. :)
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
thank you for the hellp i have played earlier ww2 games both in the call of duty and medal of honor serie so you could say i really like ww2 history and games, but i buyed waw today im gonna play it soon. i see you later.
guitargamer73568 3 years ago
i have call of duty world at war for ps2 and its differant and im thinking of getting it for ps3 but if its the same i dont really want to buy it can you tell me if the one your playing is a ps3 version
chocdor10 3 years ago
They're not the same. The video here can be considered the PS3 or Xbox 360 versions, as they're essentially the same. There may be small graphical differences, but what you see here is what you'd see on PS3.
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
ty i got call of duty5 for ps2 looks the same 2 me
playstion33 3 years ago
That's perfectly fine if you have fun with it...but trust me, there are significant differences ;)
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
u must read this. once u have started there is no turning back. a little 10 year old girl was raped and murderded in 1945. her body was not found until 1947. then a boy last week read this and did not copy and paste this message. the dead girl appeared in his room haunting him and killed him. if you do not copy and paste this onto 10 vidoes in 30 minutes the dead girl will apear in your room tonight and haunt you and kill you. well you better start to copy and paste to be saved
kabulsa 3 years ago
Gotta love the PC community :)
Sounds like a blast!
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
It's a worthwhile game, for sure. But of course, to each his own ;)
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
Agreed :)
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
the cod 5 is just a footstep for infinity ward when they make cod 6. treyarch made new features but infinity ward will just make it better.
videogamer12118 3 years ago
Oh for sure, it's painfully obvious that Activision is using the studios like this. Treyarch used the CoD4 engine to make sure World at War played great, while adding their own unique content and flair to it...and now it's IW's turn to do less work and focus on what they do best :)
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
It's no coincidence that WAW was not called COD 5, it's like a huge expansion pack.
mjd9208 3 years ago
Haha, I suppose that's one way of looking at it. But just because World at War used a lot of the development assets from Modern Warfare doesn't mean it's an 'expansion' per se ;) I understand where you're coming from though.
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
hows the flame thrower range
nellyg65 3 years ago
Good question. That's rather tough to gauge, but if I had to estimate...I'd say 15-20 feet, give or take.
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
thanks
nellyg65 3 years ago
Well you really could've just said different time period, and that would've taken into account everything you listed without all the extra typing haha ;) But yeah, this is a great game, and hopefully the last time we revisit the bloody war, heh.
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
The news may have arisen on MTV, but it's been known for a few weeks now that IW is indeed developing a follow-up to their 10 million smash hit last year.
Oh yeah baby!
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
y fine that modern warfare has more graphics then world at war
bigromeo787 3 years ago
You'll have to forgive me. I don't completely understand what you're trying to ask, and I didn't want to say anything in response and sound stupid as a result :)
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
it's pronounced "pansershrek".
cool review
traceurpaul 3 years ago
I'm actually aware of that, but for whatever reason it didn't roll of my tongue like that as I was saying it, and didn't notice afterwards. Oh well, I can't be perfect ;) Thanks for noticing though!
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
which game should i get for Christmas, Call of Duty 4 or Call of Duty World at war? Please help me. Thanks :)
MasterVideoStation 3 years ago
That's both and easy and extremely difficult question haha. On one hand, I would spare no thought to recommending both, as they're both awesome games. Obviously the two key aspects that differentiate them are the war-time settings (modern/WWII), and the weapon choice (modern/WWII). Catching my drift? Since I don't know your tastes, I don't want to point out one over the other...know what I mean?
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
i have played both, i prefer World at War over CoD 4, but i sometimes wish I could use the new guns on the WWII game, lol.... another plus to WaW is the Nazi Zombie game at the end... it's like a whole other game in itself,lol.
rocknfenderguy 3 years ago
I find Modern Warfare to be the better game (obviously), but each have incredibly fun moments, no doubt about that. Nazi Zombies is a great distraction too, but not for more than two or three successive sessions really.
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
i finish this game ......now what is next cming of call of duty??can any 1 tell me whn it realesed?????? last level of berlin is good......
kingofheart3311 3 years ago
We don't know anything about Call of Duty 6 other than the fact that the franchise is back in Infinity Ward's hands. But of course as soon as any details surface, we'll be all over them :)
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
Im getting a PS3 for christmas and don't kno which game to get with Fifa 09
ive narrowed it down to Far Cry 2, Call of Duty:World at war, Kane and Lynch:Dead men and Saints row 2
which one do you think i should go for?
Thankyou
alexc987 3 years ago
Well for one, I would avoid Kane & Lynch really, the game to me is worthwhile to rent and nothing else.
World at War, well, if you enjoyed Modern Warfare, you'd likely enjoy this.
Saints Row 2 - If you like sandbox games, you could like this. (We have a video review for this one courtesy of Jarrod.)
Far Cry 2 - It's a free roaming/FPS hybrid that has a lot to offer. It has nothing to do with the other games in the series, so that may be right up your alley.
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
should i get this instead of dead space and how long is this
khdjgsjsd121 3 years ago
Boy, that's a really tough call man. World at War is really as long as you make it to be. The campaign is about 8 hours or so depending on the difficult you play on...and then there's the online co-op and competitive. I still play Modern Warfare to this day, which speaks for that game's value.
Dead Space is also a quality game, just not as value-driven because there's no multiplayer or anything.
It's really up to you, sorry I couldn't help more.
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
thnz man
khdjgsjsd121 3 years ago
Glad I could help.
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
Excuse me, thanks for the reply. My problem is that my English is very basic
FullUser 3 years ago
No problem, and it doesn't seem THAT basic ;)
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
Muy buen video!!
pero al juego le falta mejorar un poco los graficos
FullUser 3 years ago
Heh, well imagine that, my years of taking spanish classes in high school have helped pay off, because I understood every word of that ;) Unfortunately I can't exactly respond in kind XD
It's a little tough to judge graphics betweten Modern Warfare and World at War because of the distinctly different environments. Plus the compression YouTube did to the video makes the footage a tad blurry, so you may want to see the game for yourself before you judge too much ;)
Thanks!
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
Excellent review that helped sell me on the game. I wonder though how high the score would have been raised had the A.I. in campaign been stellar instead of subpar?
Lionsden99 3 years ago
Well first off, thanks for the kind response sir, I certainly appreciate it :)
As for the AI, that's a great question. I probably would've boosted the score a few points had your fellow soldiers and the enemy been smarter...but how much, I couldn't really say ;)
Thanks for responding!
ProjectCOE 3 years ago
NICE!
wweSwantonBomb 3 years ago
Haha, well thank you very much ;)
ProjectCOE 3 years ago