when it comes to the born and the unborn, someone's rights HAVE to take precedence. there's really no way around that. i choose the rights of the born. there's no such thing as the "sanctity of life".
you would give birth to a child when you knew that it would go to bed hungry on a common basis and not be able to go to school when you had the choice to do otherwise? i can't help but suspect that you put a higher emphasis on giving birth than you do on the actual welfare of a child.
@Patrice565@Patrice565 I really wonder how far you'd take that. Maybe you're not aware of the fact that children are sometimes born without limbs or flesh-eating diseases
@mwolfson86 I am well aware of that. But I think it's very arrogant to think you know what someones life is going to be like based on their physical condition. You don't know what kind of life that person will have, and it's not for you to say their life is not worth living.
@Patrice565 I disagree. I think I can make a pretty good guess; and based on that guess, I'd rather be safe than sorry. Look up the Canadian case of Tracy/Robert Latimer. Sorry, but I would argue that her life was defined by pain unto her self and family. I bring it up because, maybe a parent is not emotionally or financially equipped to take care of a severely mentally disabled child. Furthermore, who's going to adopt that child? Who's going to give it the love that every child deserves?
@mwolfson86 Funny that you bring up that case, because according to many testimonies in the case, Tracy was a happy girl who found joy in life despite the terrible pain of her condition. Her life still had dignity and worth. Please explain to me how you think she benefited from being killed by carbon monoxide poisoning by her own father! You're right, sometimes a parent isn't properly equipped to deal with a disabled child. But for the love of God, that doesn't mean we should off them!
@Patrice565 I never said that we should "off them". I said they should not be carried to term. My position is that we should prevent their birth in order to save a whole lot of hardship. Those accounts of her happiness were anecdotal at best. It's not as if she could communicate that happiness very well, could she?
@mwolfson86 Well that's just a nicer way of saying we should kill them because they might be a burden later on, isn't it? BTW, who are you saving from all this hardship, the kid or the parents? Should people in impoverished nations not be having any children than? Should they all be aborted because they are going to be more difficult to support than a kid in rich country?Tracy smiled, laughed, and her mother said that she would describe her as a happy little girl. How was she better off dead??!!
@Patrice565 Wow. A lot of questions to answer. Luckily a few of them are easy. Should people in impoverished nations not be having children? NO! At least no more than one. Should they be aborted because they will not be taken care of properly? YES! How was tracy better off dead? She would be better off not existing. Would she get a career? Would she get a boyfriend? Would she have sex? Would she go to university? Would she play an instrument? The answer to all those questions is NO!
@mwolfson86 So you base happiness of off these things? I don't have/do any of these, and I am perfectly happy. You are basing a persons happiness/quality of life on such superficial terms. And Tracy already existed in her mothers womb, so by saying that she would be better off aborted, you are really saying that it would be better to kill her than let her live a life that wouldn't measure up to your standards of happiness. The same goes for what you said about children in impoverished nations.
@Patrice565 People said she smiled... ok... and? So, from that, we draw the conclusion that she was a happy girl? How about the fact that she had constant surgeries reported by doctors to involve a lot of pain? How about the fact that she had the functioning of a 5 month-old? I am not saying Mr. Latimer should have killed her. I'm saying that she should have not being carried to term. There is a difference. I'm advocating the right to kill an early fetus, and not a child.
@mwolfson86 So because she was in pain we should assume that she was miserable and would have preferred not to have been born? Some of the sickest people I know have also been the happiest.
But what you're really advocating is her murder at a different age. How is it ethical to kill her as a fetus, but not after her birth? She's still the same person.
@Patrice565 says: How is it ethical to kill her as a fetus, but not after her birth
~~~~~~~~ Why are prolifers always asking questions that they SHOULD know the amnswer to before they open their mouths?? If you dont know the answer.... look it up & learn
~~~~~~~~~~ You mean the way YOU conveniently didnt answer my question about whose eithical code do we go by when judging abopriton right or wrong? (smile)
@Sueezee1 The action of killing an unborn child is either right or wrong. Are you suggesting that we can all do what we like, so long as we think it is ethical? Because I bet Hitler thought there was nothing wrong with exterminating the millions of people he deemed inferior. What I am saying in my previous post is that it is illogical to say that you can kill a person only in a certain stage of development. If I can kill a person at 8 weeks old, why can't I kill my newborn baby?
@Sueezee1 So if I think it's ethical to shoot my neighbor in between the eyes because he keeps parking in front of my drive way, even though it is against the law, you are okay with me doing this?
There are somethings that are intrinsically right or wrong.
@Patrice565 Says: I bet Hitler though there was nothing wrong with exterminating million of people
~~~~~~~~~~~~ You hit the nail on the head sweetie! Thats exactly what Ive been TRYING to get through your head!! Hitler DIDNT think it was worng, neither did millions of other people. So tell us now, whose ethical code do we go by when deciding right from wrong when e veryones ideas of it are different. Your unintelligence is really boring me. Get smarter or im done w/ you
@Sueezee1 We go by the only moral code we can, what's good for humanity vs what's bad for humanity. Killing is clearly bad for humanity, because if everyone done it, we'd be extinct, and since this goes against our purpose for being here, it is morally wrong for anyone to do. See, logic.
@Sueezee1 So are you saying that Hitlers actions were justified by his beliefs? A lot of people would be very offended by that. The fact of the matter is that it is of no consequence that there are many different ethical beliefs. Some of them are just plain wrong. (Like Hitlers). Some actions are either right or wrong. I hope we both agree that things like slavery and murder are both wrong. However, there have been cultures that excepted these practices. That doesn't mean they are right.
@Patrice565 says:So are you saying that Hitlers actions were justified by his beliefs
~~~~~~~~~~~ Yes, ..he believed in it....he enjoyed it..... he didnt HAVE to justified WHAT HE WANTED TO DO. We dont have to agree with him for it to be right to HIM!! Tell me thats not justifying doing what you wanted!! God damn, you need to kick your parents asses for making you stupid. I think in leaving.
@Sueezee1 Glad to know that you support the holocaust. Thanks for showing your true colors. I'm finished talking to you. I don't debate people who condone genocide.
@Patrice565 says: what im saying is its illogical to say that you can kill a person only in certain stage of development
~~~~~~~~~~~~ According to whose logic? Yours? mine? Mr Jones down the street? You just dont see the concept here, do you? You think Its all about YOU...YOUR logic..YOUR ethics, when it is NOTHING about what you hitnk. Its about Its about ouir rights, the 5th,9th, 13th, & 14th ammendment, Declaration of human right, necessity, custom & Roe V Wade.
@Sueezee1 But you can turn this around anyway you want. Just because we all have different ethics doesn't mean we can do whatever the hell we want. It is about our rights, but the fact of the matter is that a portion of humanity is being left out of this.
@Patrice565 says: Just because we all have different ethics doesn't mean we can do whatever the hell we want
~~~~~~~~~ To our OWN bodies? YES IT DOES mean that, dumbass! If it dosent cost the government money, we can do anythign t o oursleves that we want. Prove me wrong, liar! LOL God, youre boring the hell outta me. Its like talking to a 3 rd grader! I wont stay & listen to your uneducated bull shit much longer!
@Sueezee1 It's not just your own body, though. There's another human life involved, obviously. If it was just your body, no abortion would be possible. However, you're still wrong even as it pertains to your own body. The very fact that there is 'illegal' drugs highlights it very well, as does the existence of suicide watch. Neither of these things would cost the government money, and yet are still banned. Explain?
@Patrice565 says: I should hope that you know that I meant 8 weeks after conception
~~~~~~~~~ Why should I know that, when you say "kill a person @ 8 weeks old? A fetus is isnt a person . See, if youre not intelligent and know the correct words to use...you flounder and fail. But, keep it up, proCHOICE depends on your ignorance. Thanks fo helping us!
@Patrice565 says: Ill bet Hitler thought there was nothing wrong with exterminating millions
~~~~~~~~~~ Yep, and he KNEW it WAS right. I though it WAS worng, Just like YOU KNOW abortion IS worng, and I KNOW its right..... according to our EACH of our OWN PERSONAL Ideas of whats ethical, and moral. None of us can say ANYhting is wrong or right for anyone but OURSELVES! If you dont get it....theres no hope!
@Sueezee1 If no one can tell other people what's right and wrong, how can we outlaw murder and rape? That's us pushing our morals on others, and I'm sure this makes you realize that there really is no hope if we do not force immoral people to behave morally.
i'm going to pause this video and comment when i see fit. COMMENT 1: I love how people from the Christian right in particular love to say that they used to be a die hard supporter of the other side. They do this to gain credibility. It's as if their "moral" flip-flopping gives them justification for telling people that they so much about the issue because they've seen both sides. It's such a condescending tone, and I hear it so frequently to the point where i know it's bullshit.
Antichoicers, in their noble crusade to ease the suffering of the unborn, are personally responsible for so much real world pain, it would be clearly just if they themselves felt it! Scarcity, global STORMING, and the destruction of LIFE ON EARTH you dark ages foolhardy, despite what you BELIEVE, science will NEVER let you go without the direct blame in history. Your cruelty to all sentient life shall not go unremembered!
Keep spreading the news. You are such an important voice having been on the other side. You can speak with knowledge and reach those who need to hear your words.
Thank you so so much for helping make a point, people like you should be getting the Order for defending our country's future, and not baby killer like Mr. Morgentaler!
OVER 126,000 unregulated abortion surgeries PER DAY worldwide. 300 Late Term PER DAY in USA. Is it any wonder breast cancer, infertility and STDs are the norm for women? By age 45, 47% of all American women are post abortive. 64% report coercion to abort, and deeply regret killing their baby. 86% suffer from Post-Traumatic Abortive Stress Disorder, or PAS. Thousands have died on the "safe and legal" unregulated abortion surgery table. Body parts are sold peice-meal. Disgusting, isn't it?
Please pray for my country Canada. Tomorrow July 1, 2008 (Canada day), Dr. Henry Morgentaler the person worked the hardest to make abortion legal in Canada, will receive the Order of Canada. Our county's highest honour.
It's you cousin from Ottawa here. Haven't had a chance to look at your videos because of a slow internet connection. I left you a message in your YouTube account with my e-mail address. Give us a shout.
Asia is NOT, I repeat, NOT in the throes of overpopulation. That is a racially motivated myth. South Korea has one of the lowest birth rates in the world at 1.08. Japan, 1.2, Hong Kong 0.9, Singapore, 0.8. They are VERY worried about social cohesion and stability here. Elite intellectuals and professors are sounding the alarm, yet that message is not being transmitted to those of you in North America. I am seeing the destruction of societies before my very eyes.
Antichoicers, in their noble crusade to ease the suffering of the unborn, are personally responsible for so much real world pain, it would be clearly just if they themselves felt it! Scarcity, global STORMING, and the destruction of LIFE ON EARTH you dark ages foolhardy, despite what you BELIEVE, science will NEVER let you go without the direct blame in history. Your cruelty to all sentient life shall not go unremembered!
Japan is in permanent decline with its population and will never recover.They are encouraging people to have more children, in South Korea, because they are half of the 2.1 replacement rate at 1.08.This is going to mean catastrophe for the global economy. Google "Demographic Winter" and you'll see what I mean.Abortion is having a devastating impact on, and leading to, the disintegration of societies here. I will make a video addressing these concerns in early March, so stay tuned !!!
love the video! i totally agree. you can't measure the worth of a life or the possible quality without giving it a chance to live. everyone deserves a chance no matter what the odds. keep up the great work :D
when it comes to the born and the unborn, someone's rights HAVE to take precedence. there's really no way around that. i choose the rights of the born. there's no such thing as the "sanctity of life".
hardforatard 1 year ago
Great job for truly having an open mind and searching for the truth!! Thanks soo much for sharing your beautiful story!
LandOfTheFree2 1 year ago
you would give birth to a child when you knew that it would go to bed hungry on a common basis and not be able to go to school when you had the choice to do otherwise? i can't help but suspect that you put a higher emphasis on giving birth than you do on the actual welfare of a child.
mwolfson86 1 year ago
@mwolfson86 I'd rather live poor than never get the chance to have a life at all.
Patrice565 1 year ago
@Patrice565 @Patrice565 I really wonder how far you'd take that. Maybe you're not aware of the fact that children are sometimes born without limbs or flesh-eating diseases
mwolfson86 1 year ago
@mwolfson86 I am well aware of that. But I think it's very arrogant to think you know what someones life is going to be like based on their physical condition. You don't know what kind of life that person will have, and it's not for you to say their life is not worth living.
Patrice565 1 year ago
@Patrice565 I disagree. I think I can make a pretty good guess; and based on that guess, I'd rather be safe than sorry. Look up the Canadian case of Tracy/Robert Latimer. Sorry, but I would argue that her life was defined by pain unto her self and family. I bring it up because, maybe a parent is not emotionally or financially equipped to take care of a severely mentally disabled child. Furthermore, who's going to adopt that child? Who's going to give it the love that every child deserves?
mwolfson86 1 year ago
@mwolfson86 Funny that you bring up that case, because according to many testimonies in the case, Tracy was a happy girl who found joy in life despite the terrible pain of her condition. Her life still had dignity and worth. Please explain to me how you think she benefited from being killed by carbon monoxide poisoning by her own father! You're right, sometimes a parent isn't properly equipped to deal with a disabled child. But for the love of God, that doesn't mean we should off them!
Patrice565 1 year ago
@Patrice565 I never said that we should "off them". I said they should not be carried to term. My position is that we should prevent their birth in order to save a whole lot of hardship. Those accounts of her happiness were anecdotal at best. It's not as if she could communicate that happiness very well, could she?
mwolfson86 1 year ago
@mwolfson86 Well that's just a nicer way of saying we should kill them because they might be a burden later on, isn't it? BTW, who are you saving from all this hardship, the kid or the parents? Should people in impoverished nations not be having any children than? Should they all be aborted because they are going to be more difficult to support than a kid in rich country?Tracy smiled, laughed, and her mother said that she would describe her as a happy little girl. How was she better off dead??!!
Patrice565 1 year ago
@Patrice565 Wow. A lot of questions to answer. Luckily a few of them are easy. Should people in impoverished nations not be having children? NO! At least no more than one. Should they be aborted because they will not be taken care of properly? YES! How was tracy better off dead? She would be better off not existing. Would she get a career? Would she get a boyfriend? Would she have sex? Would she go to university? Would she play an instrument? The answer to all those questions is NO!
mwolfson86 1 year ago
@mwolfson86 So you base happiness of off these things? I don't have/do any of these, and I am perfectly happy. You are basing a persons happiness/quality of life on such superficial terms. And Tracy already existed in her mothers womb, so by saying that she would be better off aborted, you are really saying that it would be better to kill her than let her live a life that wouldn't measure up to your standards of happiness. The same goes for what you said about children in impoverished nations.
Patrice565 1 year ago
@Patrice565 People said she smiled... ok... and? So, from that, we draw the conclusion that she was a happy girl? How about the fact that she had constant surgeries reported by doctors to involve a lot of pain? How about the fact that she had the functioning of a 5 month-old? I am not saying Mr. Latimer should have killed her. I'm saying that she should have not being carried to term. There is a difference. I'm advocating the right to kill an early fetus, and not a child.
mwolfson86 1 year ago
@mwolfson86 So because she was in pain we should assume that she was miserable and would have preferred not to have been born? Some of the sickest people I know have also been the happiest.
But what you're really advocating is her murder at a different age. How is it ethical to kill her as a fetus, but not after her birth? She's still the same person.
Patrice565 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Patrice565 says: How is it ethical to kill her as a fetus, but not after her birth
~~~~~~~~ Why are prolifers always asking questions that they SHOULD know the amnswer to before they open their mouths?? If you dont know the answer.... look it up & learn
Sueezee1 1 year ago
@Sueezee1 Instead of resorting to ad hominem attacks, maybe you should actually try answering the question I have presented.
Patrice565 1 year ago
@Patrice565 says try answering the question
~~~~~~~~~~ You mean the way YOU conveniently didnt answer my question about whose eithical code do we go by when judging abopriton right or wrong? (smile)
Sueezee1 1 year ago
@Patrice565 says: How is it ethical to her as a fetus but not after birth
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ According to WHOSE ethical code? Yours or mine, or the other billions in the world. get it?
Sueezee1 1 year ago
@Sueezee1 The action of killing an unborn child is either right or wrong. Are you suggesting that we can all do what we like, so long as we think it is ethical? Because I bet Hitler thought there was nothing wrong with exterminating the millions of people he deemed inferior. What I am saying in my previous post is that it is illogical to say that you can kill a person only in a certain stage of development. If I can kill a person at 8 weeks old, why can't I kill my newborn baby?
Patrice565 1 year ago
@Patrice565 says: are you suggesting we can alldo what we like as long as we think its eithical
~~~~~~ Are you kidding? Of course we can! Some may be illegal but we can still do them, cant we?
Sueezee1 1 year ago
@Sueezee1 So if I think it's ethical to shoot my neighbor in between the eyes because he keeps parking in front of my drive way, even though it is against the law, you are okay with me doing this?
There are somethings that are intrinsically right or wrong.
Patrice565 1 year ago
@Patrice565 Says: I bet Hitler though there was nothing wrong with exterminating million of people
~~~~~~~~~~~~ You hit the nail on the head sweetie! Thats exactly what Ive been TRYING to get through your head!! Hitler DIDNT think it was worng, neither did millions of other people. So tell us now, whose ethical code do we go by when deciding right from wrong when e veryones ideas of it are different. Your unintelligence is really boring me. Get smarter or im done w/ you
Sueezee1 1 year ago
@Sueezee1 We go by the only moral code we can, what's good for humanity vs what's bad for humanity. Killing is clearly bad for humanity, because if everyone done it, we'd be extinct, and since this goes against our purpose for being here, it is morally wrong for anyone to do. See, logic.
eddiehatred 1 year ago
@Sueezee1 So are you saying that Hitlers actions were justified by his beliefs? A lot of people would be very offended by that. The fact of the matter is that it is of no consequence that there are many different ethical beliefs. Some of them are just plain wrong. (Like Hitlers). Some actions are either right or wrong. I hope we both agree that things like slavery and murder are both wrong. However, there have been cultures that excepted these practices. That doesn't mean they are right.
Patrice565 1 year ago
@Patrice565 says:So are you saying that Hitlers actions were justified by his beliefs
~~~~~~~~~~~ Yes, ..he believed in it....he enjoyed it..... he didnt HAVE to justified WHAT HE WANTED TO DO. We dont have to agree with him for it to be right to HIM!! Tell me thats not justifying doing what you wanted!! God damn, you need to kick your parents asses for making you stupid. I think in leaving.
BYE!!
Sueezee1 1 year ago
@Sueezee1 LOL
So you run away again sueezee1 after being shown for the evil monster you are !
What's wrong,, can't stand looking like an evil imbecile sueezee?
BTW-sueezee1 you should not be sticking up for Hitler so much.
Because Hitler would have for sure killed anyone as evil as you!
While he did have millions killed, he was never so evil as to murder his own flesh and blood.
So just think sueezee1Your murdered unborn baby would have had a better parent if Hitler was their parent!
ekajeht 1 year ago
@Sueezee1 Glad to know that you support the holocaust. Thanks for showing your true colors. I'm finished talking to you. I don't debate people who condone genocide.
Patrice565 1 year ago
@Patrice565 says: what im saying is its illogical to say that you can kill a person only in certain stage of development
~~~~~~~~~~~~ According to whose logic? Yours? mine? Mr Jones down the street? You just dont see the concept here, do you? You think Its all about YOU...YOUR logic..YOUR ethics, when it is NOTHING about what you hitnk. Its about Its about ouir rights, the 5th,9th, 13th, & 14th ammendment, Declaration of human right, necessity, custom & Roe V Wade.
Sueezee1 1 year ago
@Sueezee1 Logic's logic, of course. Killing is logically morally wrong, and it's your job to explain why this doesn't extend to pre-birth life.
eddiehatred 1 year ago
@eddiehatred YES! Exactly, thank you!
Patrice565 1 year ago
@Sueezee1 But you can turn this around anyway you want. Just because we all have different ethics doesn't mean we can do whatever the hell we want. It is about our rights, but the fact of the matter is that a portion of humanity is being left out of this.
Patrice565 1 year ago
@Patrice565 says: Just because we all have different ethics doesn't mean we can do whatever the hell we want
~~~~~~~~~ To our OWN bodies? YES IT DOES mean that, dumbass! If it dosent cost the government money, we can do anythign t o oursleves that we want. Prove me wrong, liar! LOL God, youre boring the hell outta me. Its like talking to a 3 rd grader! I wont stay & listen to your uneducated bull shit much longer!
Sueezee1 1 year ago
@Sueezee1 In abortion two human beings are involved. Or can't you count? ;)
Patrice565 1 year ago
@Sueezee1 It's not just your own body, though. There's another human life involved, obviously. If it was just your body, no abortion would be possible. However, you're still wrong even as it pertains to your own body. The very fact that there is 'illegal' drugs highlights it very well, as does the existence of suicide watch. Neither of these things would cost the government money, and yet are still banned. Explain?
eddiehatred 1 year ago
Comment removed
eddiehatred 1 year ago
@Patrice565 says: if i can kill a person at 8 weeks old why cant i kill my newborn
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A person 8 weeks old IS still considered a new born and killing either is illegal. Weasel your way out of THAT one! LOL
Sueezee1 1 year ago
@Sueezee1 I should hope that you know that I meant 8 weeks after conception. Try answering my question now please.
Patrice565 1 year ago
@Patrice565 says: I should hope that you know that I meant 8 weeks after conception
~~~~~~~~~ Why should I know that, when you say "kill a person @ 8 weeks old? A fetus is isnt a person . See, if youre not intelligent and know the correct words to use...you flounder and fail. But, keep it up, proCHOICE depends on your ignorance. Thanks fo helping us!
Sueezee1 1 year ago
@Sueezee1 Yet you still haven't answered the question... why is it okay for a person to be killed before birth and not after?
Patrice565 1 year ago
@Patrice565 says: Ill bet Hitler thought there was nothing wrong with exterminating millions
~~~~~~~~~~ Yep, and he KNEW it WAS right. I though it WAS worng, Just like YOU KNOW abortion IS worng, and I KNOW its right..... according to our EACH of our OWN PERSONAL Ideas of whats ethical, and moral. None of us can say ANYhting is wrong or right for anyone but OURSELVES! If you dont get it....theres no hope!
Sueezee1 1 year ago
@Sueezee1 If no one can tell other people what's right and wrong, how can we outlaw murder and rape? That's us pushing our morals on others, and I'm sure this makes you realize that there really is no hope if we do not force immoral people to behave morally.
eddiehatred 1 year ago
@Sueezee1 I understand what you are saying, I just disagree with it. I thought maybe you'd be able to understand that distinction.
Patrice565 1 year ago
나 도 남한 에 갔어. 그리고 니가 바보 야!
mwolfson86 1 year ago
i'm going to pause this video and comment when i see fit. COMMENT 1: I love how people from the Christian right in particular love to say that they used to be a die hard supporter of the other side. They do this to gain credibility. It's as if their "moral" flip-flopping gives them justification for telling people that they so much about the issue because they've seen both sides. It's such a condescending tone, and I hear it so frequently to the point where i know it's bullshit.
mwolfson86 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Antichoicers, in their noble crusade to ease the suffering of the unborn, are personally responsible for so much real world pain, it would be clearly just if they themselves felt it! Scarcity, global STORMING, and the destruction of LIFE ON EARTH you dark ages foolhardy, despite what you BELIEVE, science will NEVER let you go without the direct blame in history. Your cruelty to all sentient life shall not go unremembered!
By: gene diseased
savercorp 2 years ago
You are beautiful Thank you for your honesty.
Keep spreading the news. You are such an important voice having been on the other side. You can speak with knowledge and reach those who need to hear your words.
RestrainedNoMore 3 years ago 2
Thank you so so much for helping make a point, people like you should be getting the Order for defending our country's future, and not baby killer like Mr. Morgentaler!
Bobzfamily 3 years ago
im pro choice but i like your video. you seem to really be passionate and like you know what you are talking about. i'll stay tuned.
leiapeison 3 years ago
OVER 126,000 unregulated abortion surgeries PER DAY worldwide. 300 Late Term PER DAY in USA. Is it any wonder breast cancer, infertility and STDs are the norm for women? By age 45, 47% of all American women are post abortive. 64% report coercion to abort, and deeply regret killing their baby. 86% suffer from Post-Traumatic Abortive Stress Disorder, or PAS. Thousands have died on the "safe and legal" unregulated abortion surgery table. Body parts are sold peice-meal. Disgusting, isn't it?
SantaCruzProLife 3 years ago
Please pray for my country Canada. Tomorrow July 1, 2008 (Canada day), Dr. Henry Morgentaler the person worked the hardest to make abortion legal in Canada, will receive the Order of Canada. Our county's highest honour.
steam0001 3 years ago
Hey Laura,
It's you cousin from Ottawa here. Haven't had a chance to look at your videos because of a slow internet connection. I left you a message in your YouTube account with my e-mail address. Give us a shout.
Hawkathon 3 years ago
so you went Asia and got to see true over population first hand and that made you pro-life.
this seems like flawed logic to me
Serraph108 4 years ago
It makes perfect sense. In Asia with overpopulation abortion is rampant. Her being able to see it first hand would certainly change anyone's mind.
Micah195 4 years ago
Asia is NOT, I repeat, NOT in the throes of overpopulation. That is a racially motivated myth. South Korea has one of the lowest birth rates in the world at 1.08. Japan, 1.2, Hong Kong 0.9, Singapore, 0.8. They are VERY worried about social cohesion and stability here. Elite intellectuals and professors are sounding the alarm, yet that message is not being transmitted to those of you in North America. I am seeing the destruction of societies before my very eyes.
prolifediaries 4 years ago 2
Why? Gee have you asked why?
Antichoicers, in their noble crusade to ease the suffering of the unborn, are personally responsible for so much real world pain, it would be clearly just if they themselves felt it! Scarcity, global STORMING, and the destruction of LIFE ON EARTH you dark ages foolhardy, despite what you BELIEVE, science will NEVER let you go without the direct blame in history. Your cruelty to all sentient life shall not go unremembered!
By: gene diseased
savercorp 2 years ago
Japan is in permanent decline with its population and will never recover.They are encouraging people to have more children, in South Korea, because they are half of the 2.1 replacement rate at 1.08.This is going to mean catastrophe for the global economy. Google "Demographic Winter" and you'll see what I mean.Abortion is having a devastating impact on, and leading to, the disintegration of societies here. I will make a video addressing these concerns in early March, so stay tuned !!!
prolifediaries 4 years ago 2
So, they aren't having a problem with overpopulation, but just abortion? I'm asking cause I'm pro-life and want to stay informed.
Micah195 4 years ago
It must feel good to have a clean conscience.
MarkGauvreau 4 years ago
love the video! i totally agree. you can't measure the worth of a life or the possible quality without giving it a chance to live. everyone deserves a chance no matter what the odds. keep up the great work :D
xosortasweet16xo 4 years ago
Good Job!
Way to go on your first video!
roevswade 4 years ago
Thank-you so much for your wonderful words !!!You're the best !!!
prolifediaries 4 years ago