umm when the knight took the pawn near the ending with a check couldnt kasparov take the knight with his queen i knw he loses the queen but its mate right after that move anyways.
@AztroKids Results in instant loss, because after Qf7? queen centralizes with check on Qd4+. Only move is Kg8 then rook checks and black has to block with the rook. White exchanges rooks with check and captures the black knight. The whole process removed black's only thread in the center and left white with a very easy 2 to none queen side majority, winning very easily.
Kasparov played a poorish game, weak moves on the opening and should have played 17 Rfd8 threatening d4, however this would have just equalised the position a little more.
After this loss for Deep Blue IBM asked Kasparov for a rematch & they got it in 1997, but in 1997 even though Deep Blue cheated to victory and Kasparov had the audacity and the confidence of beating Deep Blue but IBM chose to be cowards not giving Kasparov the rematch he asked for.
Computers r not intelligent, just programmed, a few games and you r well versed with their forte & would kick their asses irrespective of their processing power...watch ordinary men bitch slapping win7 at level 10
@aaronfleischer "Computers r not intelligent, just programmed, a few games and you r well versed.."
Thats just plain nonsense. The strength of the computer depends on how good its programmed by a human. Plus its makes no mistakes or loses concentration. The modern Chess-software is practically impossible to beat by any human player. Just look at the tournaments.... Deep Blue was developped 20 years ago.
@HeavyweightThinker From your channel its obvious that you are a fan of robotics hence forth your views would definitely be biased, chess programmes are developed by studying the moves of the best players that are out there hence the computer is already aware of its opponents strategy to some extent.
However if the case is vice versa where a grandmaster IS ALLOWED TO HAVE SOME TRIALS WITH THE PROGRAMME i bet he would definitely own the computer.
@HeavyweightThinker BTW..The very best of chess grand masters may not be the smartest men on the planet cause chess in not that popular and very few people choose to make a career out of it cause there's not much fame or money. Take Kasparov himself as an example, for all the cunning he's able to throw at the checkered board he's struggling at politics in real life ?
@Slaskhink1 This is certainly more likely now because of how advanced computers became since this game. I am sure there will be a day where a database will have every single possible chess position accounted for, and thus will be impossible to win against.
Kasporov said something about sensing a presence. One would be tempted to think so with the doubled double pawns. If I wanted to flourish a game I would make sure to add something like that.
white to move: Knight takes pawn c3 --> no more checkmate threat by black (rook to h1) and white is 2 pieces of material ahead during lategame=resignation
@destroyer37428 a little late, but you're right - only that it doesn't make any sense since that is the only move that was left and he's insta checkmate afterwards.
kasparov was overall one of the best players ever. however he had many strenghts such as using psychological effects or good preparation for openings. but i think when it comes to playing vs a computer where neither of these advantages have an effect, kasparow is not the best choice to show machine vs human
thats one smart computer, we just have to create all the software for computers to take over the world and then we can let the computer do it, after it's done, it will just stop and wait for the next command which will come in the next 2 million or billion years
@TheRandomEpicVideos RandomRetard, you're just an idiot who repeats things that others have said. You don't know the first thing about chess or chess computers.
URGENT AND IMPORTANT!!! MAY SOMEONE EXPLAIN ME WHY THE F.U.C.K KASPAROV RESIGNS AT 2:26, AND WHY HE DID NOT MOVE BLACK KING TO g6, THEN IF DEEP BLUE MOVE ANYTHING EXCEPT THE WHITE PAWN TO g4; then KASPAROV MAY DO CHECKMATE WITH HIS TOWER AT h1. But even if blue deep moves that pawn foward, why not to try few more mores, why to resigns???
@TheMetal135 , Or I am getting crazy? but I don't see that the White Knight could continue keeping in check him: THE WHITE KNIGHT ONLY HAVE 4 MOVES AND IN ALL OF THEM, THE BLACK KING COULD THEM EAT THE WHITE TOWER. So this is what I see now: Black Kingo move g6 his only possible move, then White move Queens to g8, that check the black king, who them have the option to move his BLACK KING TO f5, and that give some new opportunities. PLEASE VERIFY THIS AND LET ME KNOW IF I AM STILL WRONG? THANKS.
Hello, after black moves King to g6, then white gives check on g8 with Queen, King moves to f5 and after that the only winning move for white is Knight takes pawn on f3. This eliminates any mate threat's black might have had and leaves black at sever material disadvantage and moreover with continuing crushing attack of all white pieces. Kasparov must have seen that position over the board and for player of his strength it was just too obvious that it's completely hopeless.
Hey he won the first game didn't he? Considering Deep Blue thought 200 million moves per second I would say that's Damn impressive! Why not show THAT game?
And to my 3rd point I would add that the computer expects Kasparov to play the absolute best, that is, to implement a "correct defense", as Steinitz would say. Therefore neither can play toward an increase in advantage, until one of them blunders (that being Kasparov missing a tactic, or DB being outplayed positionally by Kasparov's intuition). While in "balance", any attack without sufficient advantage would lead to a refutation and loss of that advantage.
@chrism216 Please reread my comment. It has nothing to do with the video; it is a satire commentary about the argument below, using chess terminology. I recommend you think before you embarrass yourself with such a retort again.
The reason Kasparov used unconventional openings is probably because he knew that Deep Blue already had all of the more commonly used openings completely mapped out to near perfection in it's pattern library.
My guess is he just figured it was the only way to win.
Computers will never best man. Why? We can still employ the move I call the sledgehammer. There is also famous baseball bat. Or the more subtle "pull the plug". I would have used one of those when the computer started to win.
@Danthemanlyman7 What makes you think that the computer will not respond to the sledgehammer with the mega hyper laser? The baseball bat can easily be trumped by composite alloy armor. And the subtle pull the plug also has a well known counter called the "squeeze the living juices out of him".
@Danthemanlyman7 well no not really thats just like saying i can win kasparov as long as i put a bullet in his head (pull out the plug ) the sledge hammer agian is a similar analogy, in my opinion this does not prove that humans are better than chess in fact if you need those things it kind of prooves that humans are not better at chess
@Danthemanlyman7 Ok, I build a computer with a machine gun and atomic bomb attached to it, if you do anything besides move a chess piece, it kills you. Congrats, a computer has just bested man...
@atmatheprophet Black actually resigned before checkmate. His fate was sealed, via any of two or three scenarios, but unless white intentionally gave the game away from this point on, black had no chance.
@TheSolipsist1 alright there soli you fucking made any fried rice recently ya fucking stinking chink slanty eyed scumbag ! ? get back to the dog resturant ya fucking unclutured little yelllow bastard
I have played Chess for many years [being self-taught] and have won my fair share of competitions. I do remember this sequence of matches back in 1997, and I also remember Kasparov storming out of one match in a rage, having been beaten by a Deep Blue - a computer. Chess, once learned is never forgotten, and having learned at the age of 12, I have played on and off ever since.
@asdfghjkl137 Kasparov had mate-in-one on Rh1++ but he will have no chance to play it since the King is in the middle of 3 strong attacking pieces with only the queen to protect him. He also need to make sure the pawn on e3 does not fall as it is his only hope for that Rh1 mate. Once Kg6 (only move), Qg8+, Kf5 (only good move). The black queen no longer protecting e3 pawn, Nxf3 (threatening mate-in-one: Qg4++). There is no way black can defend from mate or lose a lot of material.
Bobby Fischer's chess is equal to Deep Blue if not superior, for He was the God of Gods. Rest in peace Bobby you are the BEST Ever. If Bobby was alive Deep Blue not only would resign but it would retire for good.
@TheSolipsist1 k lol i was bored and wanted to argu... dooooorknoooob shiny shiny pretty pretty... what?! oh yea i just wanted to argue with someone good luck in your life bye! lol wow i can't belive this entire argument was about i didn't say a stupid notation? lol...
@TheSolipsist1 you realize that the guy i replied to said he eats the knight right? and wow u do realize that i just started playing right? dude who even says cretin any more you need to get out of the rock your in with 2p2p4..
@fireboltttt What you have to realize is a computer program like Rybka 4. Has a huge data base of all the greatest chess Grand Masters games stored. The chess programs use all the strategies of all the great Grand Masters. So when you are playing against Rybka 4, or a chess program in general, your not just playing against a computer; your playing against all the Grand Masters that ever existed.
@orlandorjames First off, 'orlando'. You're talking out of your ass. Rybka 4 doesn't query grandmaster games. This would serve no purpose. It reference an opening library, if enabled, and also what are called endgame tablebases which is a collection of files representing all endgame positions that can occur from a set number of pieces and, more importantly, the optimum moves for both sides from those positions. Secondly, a program takes a very different approach to solving problems than a human.
@orlandorjames The reason Rybka has been so dominant in the world of chess programs is because it's developer is also an International Master level chess player. Rybka runs much slower than contemporary programs such as Fritz, Junior, Shredder, Crafty, etc, because instead of just crunching the numbers via a brute force algorithm, it is taking into consideration positional features in the game and adjusting it's assessment accordingly..
@jasonrepa Chess Programs like Rybka 4, like you said are programed by programers with knowledge of chess. Chess strategies are coded into computer language and the programs follow the instructions coded by the Programers. These chess strategies didn't always exist and had to have started from somewhere. They came from the many Grand Masters which most of the Chess opening and positions got there names.
@orlandorjames No, that's not at all what I said. You have this nasty habit of overgeneralizing things and talking out of your ass about a subject you know nothing about. This is a recipe for disaster when it comes to chess and computers.
What I said was, and I really shouldn't have to repeat myself because you should be able to figure out how to scroll up and re-read what it is that I did say, is that RYBKA 4 was developed by a programmer who is an INTERNATIONAL MASTER at chess.
@orlandorjames I didn't say that programs 'like' Rybka were developed by programmers with knowledge of chess. I implied quite the opposite
Chess strategies are NOT coded into computer lang. That isn't possible. A machine does not and cannot take same approach to chess a human takes.You CANNOT teach a chess program strategy. You can only instruct it to calculate, evaluate, and prioritize.
I know more about both chess, as well as computers, than you are capable of comprehending. Stop your BS!
@jasonrepa What I’m trying to get at is software, like chess, are written. Programs are just a bunch of instructions. The concept of strategy is written into Rybka. All the programmer is doing is taking what already was and putting into a language the machine can perform. The strategy comes from Grand Masters.
@orlandorjames Don't you get it yet? You don't know what the fuck you are talking about. You're one of these people who just likes to venture forth an opinion without so much as having a clue about the subject matter. Programs are NOT just a bunch of instructions. You don't know anything at all about computer programs. You also don't know anything at all about chess. Shut up, read, listen, and *try* to learn something.
@orlandorjames The "concept of strategy" is NOT written into Rybka. As I just finished explaining to your dumb ass, it is not possible to write strategy into a computer program. Chess computers do not approach chess the same way a human does. They do not have the ability to recognize pattern and quickly eliminate dead ends, the way a human player does. It is like comparing apples to oranges. The programmer is NOT putting a language the machine can perform. Wrong, Wrong, Wrong, Wrong, Wrong!
@orlandorjames There is no strategy from Grandmasters put into chess programs. Not Rybka, and no any other program. Never has been done, and never will be done. You're an idiot who does not know what you are talking about.
And other than Rybka, all the chess programs, even strong programs that played at the level of a Grandmaster, were written by developers who had nothing more than a casual beginner level of chess knowledge. There was no input from GM's whatsoever. It was a brute force calcul
@jasonrepa ROFLMAO, I rest my case. Since the beginning, you tried to attack my character. Unfortunately, you failed. I’m a programmer. I work in assemble language and write instructions for Intel Processors. I also have experience with C++. I’m also a chess player. I have studied Master and Grandmaster play, hell I’ve got Alexander Kotov’s Book “Think like a Grandmaster.” Alexander will admit. The strategies he use he didn’t invent, but gleaned from other masters of the game.
@orlandorjames You never had a case, 'Orlando' You're the kind of uneducated, dumb, rabble that gives ammunition to those arguing in favour of abortion.
i attacked your argument. In fact, you don't even have an argument. You're just giving out your mindless opinions. You don't have any character to attack. I tried to explain some things to you but you're too STUPID to understand anything. That's not an attack on your character. It's an objective and accurate observation.
@orlandorjames There is no way in hell you are a programmer. You wouldn't be able to figure out anything. Everything you said was amazingly dumb and naive. And you make constant assumptions. Assuming things is not what a programmer does.
You are also not a chess player. You may know the rules of the game and how the pieces move, although I have my doubts about that as well, but you are not a chess player in any way shape or form. You are too stupid to learn how to plaly chess. I proved it.
@jasonrepa ROTFLMAO Like I said before, I'm a programmer I'm also a chess player. It doesn't matter if you can't wrap your head around it. Deal with it. You failed. Your mindless comments don't even give any head way. You're not a programmer. For me to even begin to explain it to you would be a waste of my time. If only you could step outside yourself and see how silly you look. All my comments have been able to fit within the character requirement. Why are yours marked as spam? Check your ego.
@orlandorjames No, you are NOT a programmer. You are also NOT a chess player. You understand nothing at all about chess. All of your postings make this very clear. I've profiled you to a tee. That is why you continue to desperately try to impress me. You can't handle the truth. The truth is you're a mentally retarded guy who probably works as a retail clerk or an unskilled labourer. Everything You said in this thread is untrue. You have no concept.
@orlandorjames I've already offered to PROVE that you know nothing whatsoever about chess by having you a few games online. You backed down from my challenge and refuse to even acknowledge it, just like you're refusing to acknowledge my argument that proves you know nothing at all about computers or computer programming.
You're a worthess imbecile. You should not even be allowed to be online. You should be supervised and medicated. It's time for you to shut the fuck up now.
@orlandorjames At least learn what a DATABASE is before you pretend to be a programmer. You are literally the DUMBEST person i've ever met in my life. Every single thing you said is wrong. You don't even have a child's grasp of logic.
@jasonrepa Wow, you're still commenting. This is cause for celebration, I finally have my own personal hater. =) Talk about stalking. You want me to even meet you online. This is soooo cool. I post a few comments and you have a temper tantrum. This is awesome. Guess what guy. I’m a programmer and I’m a chess player. I program Intel processors. Do you even know what that means? Do you know how to program a processor? LOL, lets have some more hate. It’s like music. =)
@orlandorjames Wow, when will this retard shut up? Don't you have your cashier job to get to? You're just an anonymous jackass. You're not even worthy of hating, no more than I hate the ant that I step on as I walk to my car. You're a chronc lying imbecile with no life and no clue.
You're the one throwing the temper tantrum. You won't shut the fuck up even though everyone and their dog already knows you're a complete idiot! Does mommy and daddy know you're using their computer?
@jasonrepa Come on Jason is that all. I know you can do better. If your gonna be my personal hater, you have to declare it to the world. Please try again.
@orlandorjames The truth hurts, doesn't it little fella. You're a miserable little minimum wage retard who pretends to be more than you are while you are hiding behind your computer. I already told you, little man, you're not even worthy of hate any more than I hate the cockroach that I step on when I come visit your mother
If you only realized how stupid you sounded when you were trying to discuss chess & computers
And again, it's not surprising that you backed down from playing chess with me
@jasonrepa Good boy Jason. Good boy. That one deserves a cookie. Your gonna have to keep it up or your not gonna get another one. =) I want everyone to see how trained you are.
@orlandorjames Aww, poor little James. You were finally able to scrounge up enough bus fair to make it to the library to use the internet once again. It must suck to have a crackwhore pig for a mother and a petty thief prison inmate for a dad. I seriously feel sorry for you. No wonder you were born mentally retarded. You skank mother boozed it up each and every day of her pregnancy with you.
@jasonrepa Good boy Jason. Who's daddy's favorite boy? Who's daddy's favorite? Is it Jason? Make daddy proud Jason. =) Remember, we want everyone to see how well trained you are. I don't want to have to smack you with a newspaper, so keep up the good work. =)
@orlandorjames Like I said, faggot James, you must be frustrated that I PROVED to everyone following this thread that you're a chronic BULLSHITTER who doesn't have a clue what it is you are talking about. Just look at your first few posts in this thread.....you sound like a wide eyed 6 year old kid who's daddy just bought him a chess set. You are the DUMBEST little faggot I've ever met in my life. You have contradicted yourself at least ten times but you're too stupid to realize it.
@orlandorjames The truth hurts, doesn't it little fella. You're a miserable little minimum wage retard who pretends to be more than you are while you are hiding behind your computer. I already told you, little man, you're not even worthy of hate any more than I hate the cockroach that I step on when I come visit your mother
If you only realized how stupid you sounded when you were trying to discuss chess & computers
And again, it's not surprising that you backed down from playing chess with me
@orlandorjames You are NOT a programmer. You are also NOT a chess player. You understand nothing at all about chess. All of your postings make this very clear. I've profiled you to a tee. That is why you continue to desperately try to impress me. You can't handle the truth. The truth is you're a mentally retarded guy who probably works as a retail clerk or an unskilled labourer. Everything You said in this thread is untrue. You have no concept.
@orlandorjames Like I said, faggot James, you must be frustrated that I PROVED to everyone following this thread that you're a chronic BULLSHITTER who doesn't have a clue what it is you are talking about. Just look at your first few posts in this thread.....you sound like a wide eyed 6 year old kid who's daddy just bought him a chess set. You are the DUMBEST little faggot I've ever met in my life. You have contradicted yourself at least ten times but you're too stupid to realize it.
@orlandorjames At least learn what a DATABASE is before you pretend to be a programmer. You are literally the DUMBEST person i've ever met in my life. Every single thing you said is wrong. You don't even have a child's grasp of logic.
@orlandorjames And Like I said, it came as no surprise that you would back down from my challenge to play a few chess games online. You already know you have no chance. You don't want to suffer the embarassment.
@jasonrepa LOL. Poor little Jason. Are you soo captured by my majestic, charismatic and elegant persona that you insist we meet online? I have no desire to indulge your fantasies. We wouldn’t want you to be aroused, stimulate or excited in such fashions. After all Jason my son, you are simple and easily impressionable. =)
@orlandorjames Just keep backing down from my challenge, little guy. All you are is a mouthpiece BULLSHITTER who talks out of your gay ass. I proved it in more ways than one. Here I am, challenging you to some chess games, yet you continue to BACK DOWN because you know you're too dumb to learn how to play chess. You already know I would crush you easily every game.
You are the definition of the word COWARD! I proved it.
@orlandorjames That's it little james boy. Keep backing down from my challenge to put your "claims" to the test and play a few online chess games. You're the biggest pussy coward I've ever met in my life.
@orlandorjames Keep backing down fagboy. I challenged you to back up your claim that you know how to play chess. I'm calling you a bold faced liar and so far all you've done is to confirm that everything I said about you is true.
@jasonrepa Dude you are too funny. We are having a grand old time reading your comments. This one was the funniest. You spam alot so you get flagged alot. You have 2 accounts I assume to compensate for your habitual spams. Now you use, Solipsist, your other account to goad me into playing with you. I've already recieved emails from you under that account name. Your obsession is unbelievable. I’m starting to think you might be ill. I blame myself for not being there for you my son.
@orlandorjames Wow, the sniveling little coward is still making posts. Everyone and their dog now knows you're a mouthpiece bullshitter and a retard at this point. They've all seen you back down from my challenge to put your money where your mouth is and play me a few games of chess. But you don't know how to play chess. You're much too dumb for chess. You know that as well as I do, that's why you keep BACKING DOWN again and again.
@orlandorjames What's funny is how you take so fcccking long to respond to me, then all you do is BACK THE FUCK DOWN like a scared little schoolgirl once you do.
@jasonrepa Poor little Jason. Still day dreaming I see. This is not a forum hardly anyone cares to watch Garry Kasparov vs. Deep Blue. It’s the reason hardly anyone post comments on this video. You’re not proving anything to anyone. As I said before, I have no intention of fulfilling your wild fantasies. It's the weekend you don't have anything to do on the weekend? Here is a suggestion son. Grow up. =)
@orlandorjames That's it little James, just keep backing down in front of everyone reading this. I challenged you to a chess match but, despite your claims of being a chess player, the reality is you're too stupid to learn how to play chess. You keep proving that with each and every post you make.
You just keep BACKING DOWN again and again like the scared little coward you are.
umm when the knight took the pawn near the ending with a check couldnt kasparov take the knight with his queen i knw he loses the queen but its mate right after that move anyways.
AztroKids 3 days ago
Comment removed
hthought 2 days ago
Comment removed
hthought 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AztroKids Results in instant loss, because after Qf7? queen centralizes with check on Qd4+. Only move is Kg8 then rook checks and black has to block with the rook. White exchanges rooks with check and captures the black knight. The whole process removed black's only thread in the center and left white with a very easy 2 to none queen side majority, winning very easily.
hthought 2 days ago
Im sure kasparov knows what hes doing best
lukealexanderhwilson 1 week ago
Kasparov played a poorish game, weak moves on the opening and should have played 17 Rfd8 threatening d4, however this would have just equalised the position a little more.
almklit 1 week ago
king g6?...wtf... black has mate next move rook h1
JuicersSuck 1 week ago
@JuicersSuck He was in check
Jamesdude2000 1 week ago
After this loss for Deep Blue IBM asked Kasparov for a rematch & they got it in 1997, but in 1997 even though Deep Blue cheated to victory and Kasparov had the audacity and the confidence of beating Deep Blue but IBM chose to be cowards not giving Kasparov the rematch he asked for.
Computers r not intelligent, just programmed, a few games and you r well versed with their forte & would kick their asses irrespective of their processing power...watch ordinary men bitch slapping win7 at level 10
aaronfleischer 2 weeks ago
@aaronfleischer "Computers r not intelligent, just programmed, a few games and you r well versed.."
Thats just plain nonsense. The strength of the computer depends on how good its programmed by a human. Plus its makes no mistakes or loses concentration. The modern Chess-software is practically impossible to beat by any human player. Just look at the tournaments.... Deep Blue was developped 20 years ago.
Win7 Chess is not a professional Chess-software.
HeavyweightThinker 2 weeks ago
@HeavyweightThinker From your channel its obvious that you are a fan of robotics hence forth your views would definitely be biased, chess programmes are developed by studying the moves of the best players that are out there hence the computer is already aware of its opponents strategy to some extent.
However if the case is vice versa where a grandmaster IS ALLOWED TO HAVE SOME TRIALS WITH THE PROGRAMME i bet he would definitely own the computer.
aaronfleischer 2 weeks ago
@HeavyweightThinker BTW..The very best of chess grand masters may not be the smartest men on the planet cause chess in not that popular and very few people choose to make a career out of it cause there's not much fame or money. Take Kasparov himself as an example, for all the cunning he's able to throw at the checkered board he's struggling at politics in real life ?
aaronfleischer 2 weeks ago
Kasparov is the best
Shigenkuni1 2 weeks ago
if the king go beside the queen he wont die
TheJackobrem 3 weeks ago
O_o i want to say i understood the last thing (what? lol), but unfortunately they lost me from the beginning XD
WhatsUpManHAAA 1 month ago
échecetpath entre nous deux peaz
TheTomahawk666 1 month ago
i love jerking off to this
bLuDcLoT06 1 month ago 12
@bLuDcLoT06 best comment ever ..... Kudos sir ... Kudos
illinformedgeek 1 month ago
@illinformedgeek thank you my good sir
bLuDcLoT06 1 month ago
He resigned because of: ...Kg6, Qg8 Kf5, Rf7 pinning and winning the queen. All of this is forced.
13shepi 2 months ago 2
@13shepi Yeah, Black's Queen will be pinned. But dude, doesn't he only need one move to checkmate? He don't need no queen!
MrMonkeyJuggling 1 month ago
@13shepi lol Rf7 and white's mate with Rh1 (mate)?
more correct would be Kg6, Qg8, Kf5, g4(...Nxg4 hxg4 Kg4 Ne4++)
Kasparov saw that thus resigning ^^
clockwork003 1 month ago
@13shepi pinning will lose to Rh1.
RobertMOdell 1 month ago
@MexicanChamp1000 HEY SO DID MINE! it's the Holt McDougal Mathematic course 3.
GoPotatoes7392 2 months ago
@soanvig94 no I believe he resigned... I could be wrong though.
GoPotatoes7392 2 months ago
Interest in chess sent me
lnsertclevernamehere 2 months ago 19
MY MATH BOOK SENT ME!!!!!
MexicanChamp1000 2 months ago
Dan brown sent me!!!!!
Mastas999 3 months ago
But it isn't end! Kasparov still can move on G6
soanvig94 3 months ago
@soanvig94 queen G8 check mate i think
Cliroxs 2 months ago
@Cliroxs No because then he can move on F5
soanvig94 2 months ago
Comment removed
Cliroxs 2 months ago
Responder a este vídeo... yep, i dont understand xD
Cliroxs 2 months ago
computers can't beat us, only conedison can beat us...
AsianHideOut 3 months ago
Chess is a game where man never can beat the computer because there is always an optimal move. 150 moves ahead or 200,000. thats why man can only tie
Slaskhink1 5 months ago
@Slaskhink1 This is certainly more likely now because of how advanced computers became since this game. I am sure there will be a day where a database will have every single possible chess position accounted for, and thus will be impossible to win against.
Ilasperr 4 months ago
@Ilasperr that would mean a crapload of money, space, energy just for a chess game
tavi921 4 months ago
1:11
kojima105 5 months ago
i cant beat my laptop chess on highest
anshulkamboj 5 months ago
what?! WHAT?! HE RESIGNS?! IS THAT THE ENDING?! NAOOOOO
YZB25 5 months ago
Kasporov said something about sensing a presence. One would be tempted to think so with the doubled double pawns. If I wanted to flourish a game I would make sure to add something like that.
bobbygnosis 6 months ago
KLASS!!!
Nevolkiru 6 months ago
Soemthing I will always remember never trust a computer you cant throw out the window
TheBeaubeaubeaubeau 6 months ago
white to move: Knight takes pawn c3 --> no more checkmate threat by black (rook to h1) and white is 2 pieces of material ahead during lategame=resignation
Eurospezial 6 months ago
why did he resign he has still has a move at the side of the queen?
destroyer37428 6 months ago
@destroyer37428 a little late, but you're right - only that it doesn't make any sense since that is the only move that was left and he's insta checkmate afterwards.
Phillythekid86 4 months ago
kasparov was overall one of the best players ever. however he had many strenghts such as using psychological effects or good preparation for openings. but i think when it comes to playing vs a computer where neither of these advantages have an effect, kasparow is not the best choice to show machine vs human
ltran90 6 months ago
the white players name should be mentioned FIRST!
Simenter13 7 months ago
Arcade fire sent me!!!!!
senorshorty16 8 months ago 3
YEAH! Deep Blue fucked that stupid human up! I'm team robots bitch!
anyghost 8 months ago
I would've offered it a draw instead of resigning.
1776bricks 9 months ago
1:44
could have won two turns later...
queen to g6
queen to g1
check mate
yehoshua2123 9 months ago
@yehoshua2123 g3. End of attack. Rofl. I hope your comment was ironic
PSneakysound 8 months ago
@yehoshua2123 like a g6?
demon4411 8 months ago
thats one smart computer, we just have to create all the software for computers to take over the world and then we can let the computer do it, after it's done, it will just stop and wait for the next command which will come in the next 2 million or billion years
Zee96969696 9 months ago
Why does kasparov always pussy out?? D:<
eresimbecil92 9 months ago
Srry, best computer in the world will beat best chess player every time
TheRandomEpicVideos 9 months ago
@TheRandomEpicVideos RandomRetard, you're just an idiot who repeats things that others have said. You don't know the first thing about chess or chess computers.
jasonrepa 9 months ago
@jasonrepa nope, I was correct. Sorry kid
TheRandomEpicVideos 9 months ago
Okay, for anyone who doesnt know why the hell Garry resigned, its this : After RG7+, King moves to g6, followed by Qg8+, then Kf5, and then Rf7.
SMCB285 10 months ago
@SMCB285 and then Rh8, checkmate for Garry ! :-)
nnniiicccooowww 5 months ago
Comment removed
Spyez 2 months ago
deep blue cheated, it had another 4 grandmasters on its side
encooler1 10 months ago
What is the sequence if Kasparov takes the knight with his queen?
acmarietti 10 months ago
Looks exactly like SC2. More versatile, though. And without someone shouting commentary.
Niveastylingel 10 months ago
@Niveastylingel i wouldn't say shouting commentary. Just saying random crap (that in the case of Husky) makes the game more entertaining
technomegabit 10 months ago
URGENT AND IMPORTANT!!! MAY SOMEONE EXPLAIN ME WHY THE F.U.C.K KASPAROV RESIGNS AT 2:26, AND WHY HE DID NOT MOVE BLACK KING TO g6, THEN IF DEEP BLUE MOVE ANYTHING EXCEPT THE WHITE PAWN TO g4; then KASPAROV MAY DO CHECKMATE WITH HIS TOWER AT h1. But even if blue deep moves that pawn foward, why not to try few more mores, why to resigns???
josiqvideos09 11 months ago
@josiqvideos09 Are you fucking kidding me? You cannot see how that Knight will continue to keep him in check if he moves his King to G6?
TheMetal135 11 months ago
@TheMetal135 , Or I am getting crazy? but I don't see that the White Knight could continue keeping in check him: THE WHITE KNIGHT ONLY HAVE 4 MOVES AND IN ALL OF THEM, THE BLACK KING COULD THEM EAT THE WHITE TOWER. So this is what I see now: Black Kingo move g6 his only possible move, then White move Queens to g8, that check the black king, who them have the option to move his BLACK KING TO f5, and that give some new opportunities. PLEASE VERIFY THIS AND LET ME KNOW IF I AM STILL WRONG? THANKS.
josiqvideos09 11 months ago
@josiqvideos09
Hello, after black moves King to g6, then white gives check on g8 with Queen, King moves to f5 and after that the only winning move for white is Knight takes pawn on f3. This eliminates any mate threat's black might have had and leaves black at sever material disadvantage and moreover with continuing crushing attack of all white pieces. Kasparov must have seen that position over the board and for player of his strength it was just too obvious that it's completely hopeless.
tyhjyydesta 11 months ago
I thought kasparov won the first game./.. here i see him losing..
Emeengor 11 months ago
why does he "resign"? it was checkmate anyways he just lost!
allstars617 11 months ago
@allstars617 its not check mate he could of moved King G6
Willzybaby92 11 months ago
Hey he won the first game didn't he? Considering Deep Blue thought 200 million moves per second I would say that's Damn impressive! Why not show THAT game?
PabloPena108 11 months ago
word says the argument between orlandorjames and jasonrepa is 3479 words or 19492 characters long. probably more
just a funny fact
jorn1233 11 months ago
befor he resigns: why doesn't have he put the king one to the left ?
(sry for my bad english, but i hope you see my point)
Pokerface04HD 11 months ago
@Pokerface04HD Qg8+ Kf5
g4+ Kf4
Qb8+
and then,if you look ahead you'll see queen gets exchanged and black will lose the mating threat it has over white leaving white with the advantage
miraj0072004 11 months ago
@Pokerface04HD He could foresee all the possible moves ahead, and they all ended in defeat.
Aquillyne 11 months ago
@Pokerface04HD Qg8+ Kf5 then tower to f7 and the black queen is dead
MeditationProfonde 11 months ago
had anyting like this been tried before?
thorzo90 11 months ago
@MobiusCoin
Lol
Danthemanlyman7 11 months ago
Comment removed
David20092 11 months ago
Don't think he should've resigned, all he needed was one beat to checkmate.
theScytheofGod 1 year ago
computers are best player anymore in chess
esraretin 1 year ago
Interesting to see that the computer totally ruined Kasparov's pawn structure.
jasper0012 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Kasparov attacked by flying penis ===> youtube.com/watch?v=Jj0GPasx1ic
izimalaya 1 year ago
eso no es jaque mate
panchobalanzas 1 year ago
@panchobalanzas it said he resigns. idiot.
zergmisho 1 year ago
@panchobalanzas no es jaque mate pero kasparov ya no quizo continuar
era impossible vencer a la maquina
fifilloz 1 year ago
whoa trippy man - love the way the pieces just melt on capture - eerie
NoPrivacyANYMORE10 1 year ago
I had a great time reading the last nine pages of cheap debate. Not only was it torturously entertaining, but it was a lesson in chess :
I : unconventional, yet absolutely rotten opening, leaving both opponents open and vulnerable;
II : foolish gambits in place of minor argument development;
III : small-scale, single-step attacks, leaving neither with any advantage;
IV : the depletion of their respective sides, and seemingly now just two individuals circling one another in perpetuity.
blakerwalk 1 year ago 41
@blakerwalk
I: Theres a reason Kasparov was sitting on that chair. Its because he's better than idiots like you.
II: DB can't be a "fool", it will play the best move, with no biases like you.
III: The reason for small-scale attacks is because the computer would outplay anyone tactically. I quote Steinitz now:
"At the beginning of the game the forces stand in equilibrium.
As long as the equilibrium is maintained, an attack, however skilful, cannot succeed against correct defence."
chrism216 1 year ago
@blakerwalk
And to my 3rd point I would add that the computer expects Kasparov to play the absolute best, that is, to implement a "correct defense", as Steinitz would say. Therefore neither can play toward an increase in advantage, until one of them blunders (that being Kasparov missing a tactic, or DB being outplayed positionally by Kasparov's intuition). While in "balance", any attack without sufficient advantage would lead to a refutation and loss of that advantage.
chrism216 1 year ago
@chrism216 Please reread my comment. It has nothing to do with the video; it is a satire commentary about the argument below, using chess terminology. I recommend you think before you embarrass yourself with such a retort again.
Also, ad hominem? Really?
blakerwalk 1 year ago
@blakerwalk Have you ever played Kasparov in a game?
Tehui1974 1 year ago
@Tehui1974 Read above...
blakerwalk 1 year ago
@blakerwalk
The reason Kasparov used unconventional openings is probably because he knew that Deep Blue already had all of the more commonly used openings completely mapped out to near perfection in it's pattern library.
My guess is he just figured it was the only way to win.
ArKaineRevived 1 year ago
@blakerwalk Have you ever kissed a girl?
hustler999999 8 months ago
Computers will never best man. Why? We can still employ the move I call the sledgehammer. There is also famous baseball bat. Or the more subtle "pull the plug". I would have used one of those when the computer started to win.
Danthemanlyman7 1 year ago 78
@Danthemanlyman7 yeah because violence means better people......
barmybarmy123 1 year ago
computer no need sleep, said hammer probably has a microchip in it these days...
Chestburster79 1 year ago
@Danthemanlyman7
Implying it's not a cakewalk to hitch a strong and capable exoseleton armed with a club and a rocket launcher to a processor.
MrJihgfed 1 year ago
@Danthemanlyman7 I prefer the fact that humans allows will beat computers at kickboxing
JtiksPies 1 year ago
@Danthemanlyman7 What makes you think that the computer will not respond to the sledgehammer with the mega hyper laser? The baseball bat can easily be trumped by composite alloy armor. And the subtle pull the plug also has a well known counter called the "squeeze the living juices out of him".
MobiusCoin 11 months ago
@Danthemanlyman7 yes...pull the plug.
Flipping computers come hardwired with their book...how is this even a fair competition?
Kasparov didn't get to use a book.
Did anyone see him use a book?
Heck no!
And, is this rant doing anything for me?
no...not really.
(computers aren't anymore a player than corporations are men!)
ok...i'll leave quietly, now.
MisterBoneman 10 months ago
@Danthemanlyman7 well no not really thats just like saying i can win kasparov as long as i put a bullet in his head (pull out the plug ) the sledge hammer agian is a similar analogy, in my opinion this does not prove that humans are better than chess in fact if you need those things it kind of prooves that humans are not better at chess
mcpartridgeboy 7 months ago
@Danthemanlyman7 Ok, I build a computer with a machine gun and atomic bomb attached to it, if you do anything besides move a chess piece, it kills you. Congrats, a computer has just bested man...
mangoclanclan 7 months ago
@mangoclanclan no the maker of the computer bested man.
IBagOnKSI 6 months ago
@Danthemanlyman7 Its a draw if u get hit by the electricity
SRDTL 6 months ago
@Danthemanlyman7 the baseball bat works on people too!
toiletscrubbr 3 months ago
How is the last move checkmate when the King can still move to the left?
atmatheprophet 1 year ago
@atmatheprophet He resigns!
Tange013 1 year ago
@atmatheprophet it said he resigns. idiot.
monkee1111 1 year ago
@atmatheprophet Black actually resigned before checkmate. His fate was sealed, via any of two or three scenarios, but unless white intentionally gave the game away from this point on, black had no chance.
nezpercenathan 1 year ago
@TheSolipsist1 alright there soli you fucking made any fried rice recently ya fucking stinking chink slanty eyed scumbag ! ? get back to the dog resturant ya fucking unclutured little yelllow bastard
dobsondale 1 year ago
I have played Chess for many years [being self-taught] and have won my fair share of competitions. I do remember this sequence of matches back in 1997, and I also remember Kasparov storming out of one match in a rage, having been beaten by a Deep Blue - a computer. Chess, once learned is never forgotten, and having learned at the age of 12, I have played on and off ever since.
wayneleon1000 1 year ago
why did kasparov resign?
asdfghjkl137 1 year ago
@asdfghjkl137 Kasparov had mate-in-one on Rh1++ but he will have no chance to play it since the King is in the middle of 3 strong attacking pieces with only the queen to protect him. He also need to make sure the pawn on e3 does not fall as it is his only hope for that Rh1 mate. Once Kg6 (only move), Qg8+, Kf5 (only good move). The black queen no longer protecting e3 pawn, Nxf3 (threatening mate-in-one: Qg4++). There is no way black can defend from mate or lose a lot of material.
xdragon2k 1 year ago
@xdragon2k e3 pawn, I meant f3 pawn.
xdragon2k 1 year ago
genial
tsw360 1 year ago
@TheSolipsist1 good job dude i dont give a shit what you think now go die in a hole
stefan987654123 1 year ago
Kasparov probably thought I better surrender, otherwise they're going to torture me with all kinds of new programs.
UFOdisclosure1 1 year ago
@UFOdisclosure1
lol. The chances were against him.
soccom8341576 1 year ago
Bobby Fischer's chess is equal to Deep Blue if not superior, for He was the God of Gods. Rest in peace Bobby you are the BEST Ever. If Bobby was alive Deep Blue not only would resign but it would retire for good.
dushi21 1 year ago
@TheSolipsist1 k lol i was bored and wanted to argu... dooooorknoooob shiny shiny pretty pretty... what?! oh yea i just wanted to argue with someone good luck in your life bye! lol wow i can't belive this entire argument was about i didn't say a stupid notation? lol...
stefan987654123 1 year ago
@TheSolipsist1 yea how did you know?!?!? woah good job want a cookie for that? aww did i get you mad?
stefan987654123 1 year ago
@TheSolipsist1 you realize that the guy i replied to said he eats the knight right? and wow u do realize that i just started playing right? dude who even says cretin any more you need to get out of the rock your in with 2p2p4..
stefan987654123 1 year ago
1. Kg6 Qg8 2. Kf5 Nxf3 and black is done for sure
grandslam841 1 year ago
computers are just too strong nowadays; Look up a chess computer called Rybka 4; Apsolutely unstoppable
fireboltttt 1 year ago
@fireboltttt What you have to realize is a computer program like Rybka 4. Has a huge data base of all the greatest chess Grand Masters games stored. The chess programs use all the strategies of all the great Grand Masters. So when you are playing against Rybka 4, or a chess program in general, your not just playing against a computer; your playing against all the Grand Masters that ever existed.
orlandorjames 1 year ago
@orlandorjames First off, 'orlando'. You're talking out of your ass. Rybka 4 doesn't query grandmaster games. This would serve no purpose. It reference an opening library, if enabled, and also what are called endgame tablebases which is a collection of files representing all endgame positions that can occur from a set number of pieces and, more importantly, the optimum moves for both sides from those positions. Secondly, a program takes a very different approach to solving problems than a human.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@orlandorjames The reason Rybka has been so dominant in the world of chess programs is because it's developer is also an International Master level chess player. Rybka runs much slower than contemporary programs such as Fritz, Junior, Shredder, Crafty, etc, because instead of just crunching the numbers via a brute force algorithm, it is taking into consideration positional features in the game and adjusting it's assessment accordingly..
Also, database (not 'data base') is one word.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@jasonrepa Chess Programs like Rybka 4, like you said are programed by programers with knowledge of chess. Chess strategies are coded into computer language and the programs follow the instructions coded by the Programers. These chess strategies didn't always exist and had to have started from somewhere. They came from the many Grand Masters which most of the Chess opening and positions got there names.
orlandorjames 1 year ago
@orlandorjames No, that's not at all what I said. You have this nasty habit of overgeneralizing things and talking out of your ass about a subject you know nothing about. This is a recipe for disaster when it comes to chess and computers.
What I said was, and I really shouldn't have to repeat myself because you should be able to figure out how to scroll up and re-read what it is that I did say, is that RYBKA 4 was developed by a programmer who is an INTERNATIONAL MASTER at chess.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@orlandorjames I didn't say that programs 'like' Rybka were developed by programmers with knowledge of chess. I implied quite the opposite
Chess strategies are NOT coded into computer lang. That isn't possible. A machine does not and cannot take same approach to chess a human takes.You CANNOT teach a chess program strategy. You can only instruct it to calculate, evaluate, and prioritize.
I know more about both chess, as well as computers, than you are capable of comprehending. Stop your BS!
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@jasonrepa What I’m trying to get at is software, like chess, are written. Programs are just a bunch of instructions. The concept of strategy is written into Rybka. All the programmer is doing is taking what already was and putting into a language the machine can perform. The strategy comes from Grand Masters.
orlandorjames 1 year ago
@orlandorjames Don't you get it yet? You don't know what the fuck you are talking about. You're one of these people who just likes to venture forth an opinion without so much as having a clue about the subject matter. Programs are NOT just a bunch of instructions. You don't know anything at all about computer programs. You also don't know anything at all about chess. Shut up, read, listen, and *try* to learn something.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
Comment removed
orlandorjames 1 year ago
@orlandorjames The "concept of strategy" is NOT written into Rybka. As I just finished explaining to your dumb ass, it is not possible to write strategy into a computer program. Chess computers do not approach chess the same way a human does. They do not have the ability to recognize pattern and quickly eliminate dead ends, the way a human player does. It is like comparing apples to oranges. The programmer is NOT putting a language the machine can perform. Wrong, Wrong, Wrong, Wrong, Wrong!
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@orlandorjames There is no strategy from Grandmasters put into chess programs. Not Rybka, and no any other program. Never has been done, and never will be done. You're an idiot who does not know what you are talking about.
And other than Rybka, all the chess programs, even strong programs that played at the level of a Grandmaster, were written by developers who had nothing more than a casual beginner level of chess knowledge. There was no input from GM's whatsoever. It was a brute force calcul
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@jasonrepa ROFLMAO, I rest my case. Since the beginning, you tried to attack my character. Unfortunately, you failed. I’m a programmer. I work in assemble language and write instructions for Intel Processors. I also have experience with C++. I’m also a chess player. I have studied Master and Grandmaster play, hell I’ve got Alexander Kotov’s Book “Think like a Grandmaster.” Alexander will admit. The strategies he use he didn’t invent, but gleaned from other masters of the game.
orlandorjames 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@orlandorjames You never had a case, 'Orlando' You're the kind of uneducated, dumb, rabble that gives ammunition to those arguing in favour of abortion.
i attacked your argument. In fact, you don't even have an argument. You're just giving out your mindless opinions. You don't have any character to attack. I tried to explain some things to you but you're too STUPID to understand anything. That's not an attack on your character. It's an objective and accurate observation.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@orlandorjames There is no way in hell you are a programmer. You wouldn't be able to figure out anything. Everything you said was amazingly dumb and naive. And you make constant assumptions. Assuming things is not what a programmer does.
You are also not a chess player. You may know the rules of the game and how the pieces move, although I have my doubts about that as well, but you are not a chess player in any way shape or form. You are too stupid to learn how to plaly chess. I proved it.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@jasonrepa ROTFLMAO Like I said before, I'm a programmer I'm also a chess player. It doesn't matter if you can't wrap your head around it. Deal with it. You failed. Your mindless comments don't even give any head way. You're not a programmer. For me to even begin to explain it to you would be a waste of my time. If only you could step outside yourself and see how silly you look. All my comments have been able to fit within the character requirement. Why are yours marked as spam? Check your ego.
orlandorjames 1 year ago
@orlandorjames No, you are NOT a programmer. You are also NOT a chess player. You understand nothing at all about chess. All of your postings make this very clear. I've profiled you to a tee. That is why you continue to desperately try to impress me. You can't handle the truth. The truth is you're a mentally retarded guy who probably works as a retail clerk or an unskilled labourer. Everything You said in this thread is untrue. You have no concept.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@orlandorjames I've already offered to PROVE that you know nothing whatsoever about chess by having you a few games online. You backed down from my challenge and refuse to even acknowledge it, just like you're refusing to acknowledge my argument that proves you know nothing at all about computers or computer programming.
You're a worthess imbecile. You should not even be allowed to be online. You should be supervised and medicated. It's time for you to shut the fuck up now.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@orlandorjames At least learn what a DATABASE is before you pretend to be a programmer. You are literally the DUMBEST person i've ever met in my life. Every single thing you said is wrong. You don't even have a child's grasp of logic.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@jasonrepa Wow, you're still commenting. This is cause for celebration, I finally have my own personal hater. =) Talk about stalking. You want me to even meet you online. This is soooo cool. I post a few comments and you have a temper tantrum. This is awesome. Guess what guy. I’m a programmer and I’m a chess player. I program Intel processors. Do you even know what that means? Do you know how to program a processor? LOL, lets have some more hate. It’s like music. =)
orlandorjames 1 year ago
@orlandorjames Wow, when will this retard shut up? Don't you have your cashier job to get to? You're just an anonymous jackass. You're not even worthy of hating, no more than I hate the ant that I step on as I walk to my car. You're a chronc lying imbecile with no life and no clue.
You're the one throwing the temper tantrum. You won't shut the fuck up even though everyone and their dog already knows you're a complete idiot! Does mommy and daddy know you're using their computer?
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@jasonrepa Come on Jason is that all. I know you can do better. If your gonna be my personal hater, you have to declare it to the world. Please try again.
orlandorjames 1 year ago
@orlandorjames The truth hurts, doesn't it little fella. You're a miserable little minimum wage retard who pretends to be more than you are while you are hiding behind your computer. I already told you, little man, you're not even worthy of hate any more than I hate the cockroach that I step on when I come visit your mother
If you only realized how stupid you sounded when you were trying to discuss chess & computers
And again, it's not surprising that you backed down from playing chess with me
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@jasonrepa Good boy Jason. Good boy. That one deserves a cookie. Your gonna have to keep it up or your not gonna get another one. =) I want everyone to see how trained you are.
orlandorjames 1 year ago
@orlandorjames Aww, poor little James. You were finally able to scrounge up enough bus fair to make it to the library to use the internet once again. It must suck to have a crackwhore pig for a mother and a petty thief prison inmate for a dad. I seriously feel sorry for you. No wonder you were born mentally retarded. You skank mother boozed it up each and every day of her pregnancy with you.
You're a chronic liar and a loser, little fella.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@jasonrepa Good boy Jason. Who's daddy's favorite boy? Who's daddy's favorite? Is it Jason? Make daddy proud Jason. =) Remember, we want everyone to see how well trained you are. I don't want to have to smack you with a newspaper, so keep up the good work. =)
orlandorjames 1 year ago
@orlandorjames Like I said, faggot James, you must be frustrated that I PROVED to everyone following this thread that you're a chronic BULLSHITTER who doesn't have a clue what it is you are talking about. Just look at your first few posts in this thread.....you sound like a wide eyed 6 year old kid who's daddy just bought him a chess set. You are the DUMBEST little faggot I've ever met in my life. You have contradicted yourself at least ten times but you're too stupid to realize it.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@jasonrepa Good boy Jason, You are soooo obedient and well trained. Keep up the good work. LOL =)
orlandorjames 1 year ago
@orlandorjames The truth hurts, doesn't it little fella. You're a miserable little minimum wage retard who pretends to be more than you are while you are hiding behind your computer. I already told you, little man, you're not even worthy of hate any more than I hate the cockroach that I step on when I come visit your mother
If you only realized how stupid you sounded when you were trying to discuss chess & computers
And again, it's not surprising that you backed down from playing chess with me
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@orlandorjames You are NOT a programmer. You are also NOT a chess player. You understand nothing at all about chess. All of your postings make this very clear. I've profiled you to a tee. That is why you continue to desperately try to impress me. You can't handle the truth. The truth is you're a mentally retarded guy who probably works as a retail clerk or an unskilled labourer. Everything You said in this thread is untrue. You have no concept.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@jasonrepa Jason you're being a bad little boy. Now your just spamming. Failed. LOL =)
orlandorjames 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@orlandorjames Like I said, faggot James, you must be frustrated that I PROVED to everyone following this thread that you're a chronic BULLSHITTER who doesn't have a clue what it is you are talking about. Just look at your first few posts in this thread.....you sound like a wide eyed 6 year old kid who's daddy just bought him a chess set. You are the DUMBEST little faggot I've ever met in my life. You have contradicted yourself at least ten times but you're too stupid to realize it.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@orlandorjames At least learn what a DATABASE is before you pretend to be a programmer. You are literally the DUMBEST person i've ever met in my life. Every single thing you said is wrong. You don't even have a child's grasp of logic.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@orlandorjames And Like I said, it came as no surprise that you would back down from my challenge to play a few chess games online. You already know you have no chance. You don't want to suffer the embarassment.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@jasonrepa LOL. Poor little Jason. Are you soo captured by my majestic, charismatic and elegant persona that you insist we meet online? I have no desire to indulge your fantasies. We wouldn’t want you to be aroused, stimulate or excited in such fashions. After all Jason my son, you are simple and easily impressionable. =)
orlandorjames 1 year ago
@orlandorjames Just keep backing down from my challenge, little guy. All you are is a mouthpiece BULLSHITTER who talks out of your gay ass. I proved it in more ways than one. Here I am, challenging you to some chess games, yet you continue to BACK DOWN because you know you're too dumb to learn how to play chess. You already know I would crush you easily every game.
You are the definition of the word COWARD! I proved it.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@jasonrepa LOL. =) Gotta love my hater.
orlandorjames 1 year ago
@orlandorjames That's it little james boy. Keep backing down from my challenge to put your "claims" to the test and play a few online chess games. You're the biggest pussy coward I've ever met in my life.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@jasonrepa "little james boy" LOL. =) Gotta come stronger than that, son. You're just using my material. Where is your creativity? Failed. =)
orlandorjames 1 year ago
@orlandorjames Keep backing down fagboy. I challenged you to back up your claim that you know how to play chess. I'm calling you a bold faced liar and so far all you've done is to confirm that everything I said about you is true.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@jasonrepa Dude you are too funny. We are having a grand old time reading your comments. This one was the funniest. You spam alot so you get flagged alot. You have 2 accounts I assume to compensate for your habitual spams. Now you use, Solipsist, your other account to goad me into playing with you. I've already recieved emails from you under that account name. Your obsession is unbelievable. I’m starting to think you might be ill. I blame myself for not being there for you my son.
orlandorjames 1 year ago
@orlandorjames Wow, the sniveling little coward is still making posts. Everyone and their dog now knows you're a mouthpiece bullshitter and a retard at this point. They've all seen you back down from my challenge to put your money where your mouth is and play me a few games of chess. But you don't know how to play chess. You're much too dumb for chess. You know that as well as I do, that's why you keep BACKING DOWN again and again.
Do you wear panties?
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@orlandorjames What's funny is how you take so fcccking long to respond to me, then all you do is BACK THE FUCK DOWN like a scared little schoolgirl once you do.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@jasonrepa Poor little Jason. Still day dreaming I see. This is not a forum hardly anyone cares to watch Garry Kasparov vs. Deep Blue. It’s the reason hardly anyone post comments on this video. You’re not proving anything to anyone. As I said before, I have no intention of fulfilling your wild fantasies. It's the weekend you don't have anything to do on the weekend? Here is a suggestion son. Grow up. =)
orlandorjames 1 year ago
@orlandorjames That's it little James, just keep backing down in front of everyone reading this. I challenged you to a chess match but, despite your claims of being a chess player, the reality is you're too stupid to learn how to play chess. You keep proving that with each and every post you make.
You just keep BACKING DOWN again and again like the scared little coward you are.
jasonrepa 1 year ago
@orlandorjames You're slowing down little guy. I guess I scared you off.
jasonrepa 1 year ago