Added: 5 years ago
From: entropy111111
Views: 69,163
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (559)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Good effects !

  • How were you able to use a computer as a power source?? Please answer thanks

  • this is still damned cool. either one of you nerds can admit that.

  • Would it still float if the top half was covered, or would that not provide enough air to generate lift?

  • @StarFoxAutobot it probably would still lift..though at a reduced rate. the real problem would be weight. there isnt much thrust there to begin with (hence why were using thin thin thin balsa wood, light wires, and tin foil)... I know some engineer put a lifter in a high-vaccum (a real one, not a shitty JNL Naudin one)..and the thing would not lift at all... so yeah, anything you do to decrease that airflow, kills the the thrust.

  • @entropy111111 What if it were multiple lifters attached to a closed body? How much power would be required for 4 lifters, attached to a 500 pound body?

  • @StarFoxAutobot umm...... never calculated thrust..so Im not sure. But there is a limit to how much each one can lift regardless of power used (28k volts is norm-ish). I saw one that was HUGE, on youtube....someone put a hamster in it....which was funny, but also intersting...just to lift a hamster..the thing had to be massive. Ion wind is pretty damn weak....Interesting as hell. But genearlly verrrrrrrrrry weak. using a rocket or the likes would be a better use of money.

  • @entropy111111 The thrust is EXPONENTIAL with increasing Voltage. THere is no limit. And no, the thrust is NOT weak. Look at my Beamships, and the TT Brown saucers I built and flew in 1999, and presented in Reno Nevada in 2000. THese are very heavy.

  • @entropy111111 The thrust is EXPONENTIAL with increasing Voltage. THere is no limit. And no, the thrust is NOT weak. Look at my Beamships, and the TT Brown saucers I built and flew in 1999, and presented in Reno Nevada in 2000. THese are very heavy, yet there is no "wind" from them, and they go from a standing start to 12 RPM with the 100-120 kV at some tens of microAmps. High Energy electrostatics produces forcefield phenomena that is indistinguishable from gravity, just like relativity..

  • @Beamshipcaptain youre delusional. . .

  • @entropy111111 Opinions vary. Nevertheless, my Beamships are the largest and most energy thrifty of such devices in the world, after over nine years. And I am published. I have been researching and working with electrogravitcs since 1982. What were YOU doing in 1982? Bottom line, this tech and teangential technologies will form the basis of the starships of the 21st Century.

  • @Beamshipcaptain dude....its ion wind..its not that amazing. In the grand scheme of physics, it's pretty damn boring....I mean..really, look at the two alternatives: 1) a 25k potential ionized the air, and moved air particles, or 2) (as you think) a 25k potential DISTORTED SPACE TIME....hahahahahahahahahah...­cmon man. you can't be serious. go back to school.

  • @entropy111111 "Dude", ion wind has an upper limit, and that limit is over 3 orders of magnitude too feeble to cause levitation. The effect is more efficient in vacuum, because cuurrent can be turend way down and there is no corona to rob efficiency. I sealed up TT Brown saucers in platic and they flew backwards, in 2000. A youTuber sent be a vieo of TT Brown saucers he sealed in epoxy and they also flew backwards. Scientist John Fiala flew my Beamships in vacuum, and with onboard power.

  • @Beamshipcaptain dude... plastic bags still have air in them...who cares if you put them in some bags....as for john fiala...really..show me the results...cause the guys at blaze labs (google: lifter in vacuum (or see my video description for the link) and NASA..and whole bunch of ACTUAL scientists that get paid to do science proved youre full of it

  • @entropy111111 No wind can escape a plastic bag. A youtuber even encased TT Brwon discs in epoxy, and they flew backwards also. No wind can escape expxy either. Purdue University, and the US Army showed wirhAlgebra why ion wind is over three orders of magnitude too feeble to cause levitation., Those are also ACTUAL scientists. Takaaki Musha (HONDA R & D) another ACTUAL SCIENTIST showed it works more efficietly in vacuum. NASA even showed it works better in vacuum, their videos are on Youtube.

  • @Beamshipcaptain hahaha....again...who gives a shit if "no wind" can escape a plastic bag, you still have air in there that becomes ionic, and thrust towards the skirt. there is a momentum transfer providing thrust regardless if there is a plastic bag around it... respond to the Blazerlabs trial...they used a nice vacuum set up...thats a REAL vacuum. Ive worked with those...it takes like a week to remove all the air. and lo and behold...NO THRUST IN VACUUM.

  • @entropy111111 Then they grounded the container or some other error. In 1955 in Paris France, the concept was proven with a billionth of an atmosphere. Same thing in 1959, a couple miles from her in King of Prussia, PA. Google ELECTROHYDRODYNAMICS. If no wind can excape the bag, or expxy, you should have no thrust. Instead there is the same thrust, in REVERSE direction. The Effect also cancels out all inertia. Instant satrts and stops and changes of direction at any speed, with no sensation.

  • @Beamshipcaptain you know damn well that blaze labs didnt have any grounding errors. That is a very well done experiment. And no, youre still wrong...if there is ANY air inside a bag, you can speed air particles around, which will carry momentum, and you'll have thrust. Think of the earths atmostphere as one giant "bag"...planes still work inside...youre analysis is way off base. New question: if you knew you were wrong, would you admit it.

  • @entropy111111 Blaze had some kid of error, because electrostatics works in vacuum. THat is the theory behind vacuum tubes. PLUS, there is no air in the resin/epoxy encsed discs. I am no wrong, because I have done the research. Your research is incomplete. US ARMY and university research (Purdue Energy conversion Lab), and TT Brown's own work, Plus John Fiala prove that ion wind is too negligible a force to be of any value. But the Biefeld Brown effect cancels inertia, and is EXPONENTIAL ^ Volts

  • This is NOT an ion wind generator. Research JNL Jnaudin Labs. They already proved all this years ago.

    Experiments show it works when sealed in a plastic bag,. The 'Lifter' also works inside a vacuum. Although ions may be present, they are not doing the work here. This device creates a gravity well for itself, Literally pulling itself up by it's own bootstraps. Make your own 'ufo': You can find power supply here:

    amazing1 DOT com

    You are part of the problem promoting 'ions'. STOP!

  • @evolutioncult

    1) Fuck you...

    2) see above.

    3) get a physics degree and quit being an internet scholar.

  • @evolutioncult you fucking idiot this is an ionic lifter NOT antigravity you fucking idiot. nasa has proven these FAIL in a vacuum. fuck. you.

  • @evolutioncult Thanks for clearing up the disinformation. John Fiala tested my Beamships in vacuum, and they still fly. I sealed TT Brown sheet metal saucers in plastic bags and they still fly BACKWARDS. Someone sent me videos of TT Brown discs sealed in Epoxy; they also fly backwards. Someone is still trying to suppress this warp drive methodology from us. Follow the money trail.

  • Awesome! I wanna make one!

  • Did you try using 3 colums this time? It should help for it not o dance.

  • why arent the big companies using this to lift plains or something, im sure they could with there resources???????

  • @Beamshipcaptain What do the military use it on, i aint never seen it used for warfare purposes?

  • Comment removed

  • @Beamshipcaptain What language lol?

  • how do you use the tv to power it I need to know.

  • @Tyson200422

    ahah..why do you need to know

  • Hahaha how to impress your friends with science !!

  • @TheBeamshipCaptain hahahahha

  • Magnetic fields my friend, magnetic fields...

    They are the key to understanding the only kind of multidimensional interstellar space ship propulsion systems and also real infinite power from within and in spacetime, the larger things are a copy of the smaller things it goes on and on in infinite proportions.

    Dan winter and some other folks have researched this phenomenon for decades.

    You want to understand the workings of the universe and E.T life then thats where you want to be.

    Peace.

  • Bullshit.

    Bending of the space-time continuum wich leads to space ships.Not a simple magnetic field.This ion win didnt work in space.

  • Bending the space-time continuum is just one part of multi-dimensional travel wich is done with using magnetic fields generated by a device similair to a magnet wich power surge is generated out of the infinite ether.

    You puny delusional humans have earned the distinguished galaxiest retarded planet for you have been kept boxed and prisoned for the longest time recorded in time-space untill this point.

    How can you be so full of yourself and correcting someone who has seen them been assembled?

  • Why?Are you have a proven desing?No.

    I think you didnt know what is time.Or what is bending the time itself on some level.I have ideas how to do it .What are you have?Theorys?

    And again why? Because it as proven by nasa that your little ion thingy didnt work in cold space.Actually i think it can be more useful is you developing a sunsailing ship.And use it as a template.

    The ion thrust can help to that ship somehow.

  • @gun844 What if in space you use like a lightbulbthingy that heats or heater cuircuit? Oh never mind I just thought up of 2 reasons why not. Well atleast we will always have Starwars(sigh). I want a drone

  • @Space0wl Too much fractal juice for you sir!!

  • is this the same tech they used to raep at montauk?

  • Ion wind? I don't think it's possible!! It might be god miracle?? ahah! i'm jockin!

  • Avast me hearties, me crew be searchin these wide seas for the scurvy dog author who impugns my good friend, Long John Searl: maybe ye have heard this suddy yarn, known in these parts as:

    "Tirade of The Lifters Beaming, The Curse of the Crank Searl"

  • Comment removed

  • I thought we were all on the same page when we last spoke at COFE 3. You guys as a group came to me, and I know my instructions to all of you were the same. You run the electricity through the dead human bodies, and you get a monster. Then sit back and watch the fun. You got the electricity part right, but I don't understand the balsa wood and tin foil. These things won't scare anyone, and the only way it will kill your fiances is if she gets careless with the wires. Forget COFE 4.

  • either that or yoush guysh pushed all the thumbsh down six timesh and it took em off...

  • now he'sh trying another shcam: He'sh "Playing the Victim"

    so'sh youtubesh will shick their copsh on all hish impershonatorsh when they get finished laughingsh..whoa

  • How about we all concede he's as good as Sting?

    you know, StingshipCaptain, maybe?

  • "So under hard vacuum conditions, a force of 110 grams (1.1 Newtons) could be achieved for power expenditure of just 0.5 Watt. (250,000 Volts times 2 x 10 ^-6 Apms), or 2,200 Newtons of thrust per KiloWatt. That is about 150 times the Thrust to Power Ratio of a Jet Engine! Also it is 10,000 times greater than the thrust-to poser-ratio of a space-shuttle-Main engine".-SECRETS OF ANTIGRAVITY PROPULSION(2008), Paul A. LaViolette,PhD.

  • You reference the same theories all the time.... if it were true, you could do it on video and end all this debate.

    But I have been asking you for the video. You don't have one of your own. You fail.

  • Where is your video that I have been asking you to provide for over a year now.

    Show the vacuum chamber! Show the lifter! (not the asymmetrical capacitor rotating a couple degrees then stopping). That is not the same.

  • I don't have a video of a vacuum-chaber lifter, but others do, including from the inventor, TT Brown, home movies of which I obtained in 1990. Would love to do some vacuum-work. Are you providing the funding? No need. Successful vacuum-work is in the literature, and on video online. The vast majority of vacuum tests show increased efficiency; Brown showed in Paris in 1955, at GE Space Center in 1959, AH Bahnson Labs in 1956-58, T.Musha at the 2007 AIAA; if that is not enough,something is wrong.

  • Comment removed

  • "I don't have video of a vacuum chamber lifter, but others do" -bsc

    No, they don't. They have asymmetrical capacitors that rotate only a few degrees then stop... in a vacuum.

    After all these years? You are in charge of manned space flight at swallowcommand and you have never tested in a vacuum? GO TO A UNIVERSITY and ask to use the lab.

    "Successful vacuum work is in the literature" -bsc

    Do you honestly believe that because it is in writing, it is true?  Science fiction fanatic!

  • Actually I have seen that very same video on display at a Kenmore convention, it was a test of a new prototype oven, the 'lifter' is actually a brace on which is mounted the prepped corpse of a chicken or turkey. Thirty of these braces can be mounted in this new oven, for production cooking of a whole lotta chickens, turning slowly as they cook. I remind everyone that there is nothing in that video that identifies it as anything else. (I worked in advertising at the time)

  • You are wasting your time. He will repeat himself ad nauseum, it is like some mantra thing, or an obsession. I get the idea he is trying harder to convince himself than trying to convince you. Hey, better that it's lifters rather than booze or cocaine, right? He's not a bad guy, and he's not crazy as you can see from his other videos; he's got real friends and plays in a band, and actually is a pretty darn good bass player. But he is a heckuva lot of fun to bait... right, Captain?

  • Way too much fun actually.

  • Comment removed

  • The worst kind of guilty pleasure; kicking special olympians?

  • I am trying to get him to see the error of his methodology. I think we have something if he recognizes his own hypocrisy of quoting that he believes the scientific method involves REPEATING the experiments (as quoted here "watch?v=Jk2GGoMJ7NU")

    And the fact that he has never flown a lifter in a vacuum, and hasn't even had access to a vacuum chamber. And the fact that beamshipcaptain has only been taking selected papers as gospel while rejecting papers that conclude the counterarguments.

  • You may actually get him to admit it, but then if you come back in a week it will be back to business as usual. I think it's more of a blind faith thing. It's like guys who go into bars looking to fight - they'll get their teeth broken and they still go back for more. But here no violence, it's manic altruism, a committed desire to build the idealistic world of Star Trek, which is a good thing, so this is his fight to get it.

    People may get annoyed but no one's teeth are broken.

  • just my keyboard as I smash my head into it in frustration.

  • Don't forget to remove the 'G' key from your smashed keyboard, it's actually an Illuminati spy device.. 'G' for Government. I say stuff like that just to be absurd, but I guarantee someone's mind somewhere has started turning on it: 'Yeah, that makes sense! They are reading my thoughts through it, and the G is the middle key of the keyboard" or some such other bizarre rationalization.

    It's a joke, it's made of plastic. Embedded with a microbio sensor keyed to you by your touch blahblahblah

  • I agree that this is considered harmless zealotry.

    But I think much of the world's problems stem from mis-education.

    Pseudoscientific belief distract and steal resources from legitimate problems.

  • Yeah, but as long as we have youtube to identify and give that hugely needed public forum to these guys, chances are that it will occupy/satisfy their egos so that they won't waste time or money pounding on real doors. Seeing those magnet nuts, there may be one or two miracles in there where you might've otherwise seen a bomb maker had his mind not gotten intrigued by magnet (or lifter!) videos. Don't have to have a lot of intellect to fall into an intellectual trap.

  • Very true... Soapboxes do have the benefit of preventing these types from seeking attention through more violent means.

  • I especially like how the Captain goes through and clicks all the 'thumb down' on comments he doesn't like, and the 'thumbs up' on the ones he likes, that's great. I follow behind him and click the opposite. And he tells other lifter guys that I'm a fraud, then they leave comments on my channel that the 'youtube police' have my IP address, and my channel will be shut down; I'll be prosecuted for fraud.

    I never guessed the internet was so much fun.

  • Yeah... i too remove the thumb downs for everyone.

    I am trying to help him distinguish reality from the virtual. Like the factual from the theoretical. Youtube is so virtual, his identity cannot be stolen (unless he posts his SSN)

    By definition, wrong theories will significantly outnumber correct ones. He doesn't know that yet.

  • Do you ever get the idea that deep down he does know the difference? Watch his other videos, there aren't any tinfoil helmet videos. Just tinfoil lifters, but they actually work, just not the way he claims, but he doesn't sell them on his claims. It's seems more like an Oddfellows club, where the game is never admit you are wrong. You know, word was that established respectable scientists told Tesla his AC generator idea was a 'perpetual motion scam'.....

  • Comment removed

  • You guys got it squared, and are definitely at the top of the ticket. those other guys are fulla shit, you betcha.

    Say, you got a coupla bucks so's a buddy can get a drink?

  • Or it may be a case where we are just assuming the merchant's scales are capable of being properly calibrated. We might open the case and find there is no balance mechanism inside. I've made that mistake before that before, oh boy...

  • ah I'm getting punchy... omit the 'that before' prior to the 'oh boy' in previous post.

  • Yeah fella, we all get punchy, comes with the territory. You'll knuckle under and get it done, no problem, you'll see,

    Say.. you got a coupla bucks for guy who could use a drink?

  • It's kind of like someone with heavy religious beliefs, but he's replaced the impractical barbarity of religion with a faith that science can cure all ills. When I was a little kid I didn't believe in Santa or Jesus but anything spoken by Kirk or Spock was gospel. It puts responsibility in our hands and says no to the supernatural; you don't need to die to go to heaven, it can be built by putting faith in science. Even if he's wrong, he 'knows' science will one day make it right somehow.

  • If they did'nt work in a vacuum, VACUUM TUBES would not work.Lab devices weighing 100 grams have produced thrust of 110 grams, for input of 500 Watts(250,000Vots@2 milliApms). Performed in air of 1Atm.Supplementary research indicates much greater efficiency in vacuum(10^-4mm Hg or better) when current drops to about 2 microAmperes.

  • This is what I think people mean when they apply the term

    'tour de force'

  • You fraud, they mean 'tour de farce'. Impostor, you twist and twist and scream in 'a cage of your own making'. BeamshipCaptain told me in a reply on another video that

    'Your cage is of your own making'. I thought that it was pretty good, and does tempt me to actual criminal behaviour: I am tempted to plagiarize that statement without

    giving the Captain credit. Of course I should count myself lucky.. many have to deal with temptations of a much grimmer sort: booze, drugs, women, lifters.

  • "Selfish Steam", oh jeez, BeamshipGeneral, that was BRILLIANT!! HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW...wait... I might be confused...aren't I BeamshipGeneral?... omigod, I just replied to one of my own posts as if I thought I was someone else!! GAWD SAVE ME!! THE CAPTAIN IS RIGHT!! I AM IMPERSONATING MYSELF!! (sounds of heavy wracked sobbing) oh, Gawd, help me (more wracked sobbing, arms thrashing wildly) what'll I do?? (sobs ebbing) ah, it's no big deal. HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW

  • And,stop using names similar to mine please. I am flattered really, but surely you can do better?

  • Ah-ha!! I almost said "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery" earlier when you were talking all that fraud stuff'. Anyway(back to the real fun), I was wondering about why they liked the triangular wire, because I also thought the edges caused the corona and sparks and that round wire was the best. I gotta listen more closely to those guys, and I'll ask them the next time I see them. I have thought of experimenting with this stuff, but really don't have much time.

  • Triangular cross-section wire makes no-sense. Tell me what to google, and I'll take a gander at it. Peace.

  • I never thought of looking it up on google about the sharp wire thing....googled 'lifter with sharp edged wire' ..yep, there are only links about leakage with sharp edge. I only saw their first lifter with a really small round copper wire, they were talking later about the gold tri-wire later, but I haven't seen it. Been a while since I saw those guys, but they are strictly ion-wind characters, they say it's no way it'll be anything else; by-the-book physics types.

  • They would get better results with less-input energy if they abandoned that line of thinking and followed TT Brown's patents and lab-notes ,which I have. Peace.

  • Hey boys, sorry I been gone. Tonight I am posting from fabulous Macau (Hong Kong's crazier little brother) Got a few minutes before getting back to the internet censorship convention downstairs. Guess what the topic is: gizmo called a 'censorchip' HA! We never get tired of saying things like "this amazing new censorchip makes censorship so much more fun than it used to be". It's gonna be installed on all new computers in 2010. Except for Apple; goddamn Steve Jobs, won't play ball.

  • So does the 'ion breeze' have more in common with (but not akin to) a microwave than an actual movement of the air we breathe, not like air moving over the wing of a plane? Like the microwave excites water molecules, thereby causing heat from friction, which 'cooks' the food. Guess maybe the volt saturated copper wire 'excites' air (nitrogen or oxygen atoms? both? based on frequency of the voltage?) so that frictioned(?) ions 'race' to the foil?

    Does it work with other metallic foils?

  • As you know, whoevery you are, the biefeld Brown effect has been measured at 100-million times greater than the force of ion wind. I have been reading Jean Louis Naudin's site for ten-years. William J. Beaty proved several years ago with experiments with a digital anemometer, and simple algebra, that the air-movement (only 1.5 mph) was less thatn half of the airspeed needed to levitate lifter-2. So obviously, another force is involved. The inventor, TT Brown dubbed it ELECTROGRAVITY,in 1928.

  • It should work with ANY conductor, CARBON WIRE works the best, but it is more brittle than stainless-steel, (we use .003" stainless for corona-suppression, and increased lifting-force, as you probably knew already), and force is increaseed exponentially with increasing Voltage. Only enough Current is rquired to replace leakage -losses. The reason these work is STORAGE AND RETENTION OF CHARGE. That's why seams and sharp-corners are avoided on the devices.There is a physical limit to ion-wind.

  • Have you heard anything about getting better results from a wire that wasn't round but itself had sharp edges, or a wire that had a triangular core (cross section is a perfect triangle, three sharp edges) Stainless steel, that's interesting. The guys I know who do it like copper or gold wire, and said they got the best lift from a triangular gold wire (they are a bunch of lifter nuts at Columbia Univ) I'll ask what they meant by 'best lift' though, not sure.

  • No. And we do not want sharp corners anywhere. We make it just like the patent USPat# 2,949,550, which shows ROUND wire and forward-electrode. Which is what I used in teh TT Brown saucers I built starting at the end of January, 1990. They worked fine. Sharp corners csue corona and leakage-losses that rob power, and force. Ideally we want ROUNDED surfaces and corners on the TT Brown saucer, because that produces far more thrust for less powerinput. We only need enough current to replace leakage.

  • It appears that Brown was cyclically varying the Voltage accross the plates of the electrokinetic apparatus at frequencies of around 750 megaHertz to maintain a high thrust condition. The ELECTROHYDRODYNAMICS report notes the thrust on the EK apparatus was observed to increase directly with K-factor of the dielectric and according to the square (and in some cases the cube) of the applied Voltage. A dielectic w/ a factor of 50, 12 times greater than Pyrex, would produce 12-fold greater thrust.

  • These thrust measurments showed ion-wind is insuficient a force by ordres of magnitude. For example, an upward thrust of 110 grams is equal to force of 10^5 dynes. By Comparison,a 2 microAmpere ion wind resulting from electrons accelerated in a 250-kiloVolt potential would yield a force of somewhat over 10^-3 dynes, almost 100 million times less than the lift produced by Brown's Electrokinetic Apparatus (which I built in 1990).

  • There was a website of a guy (don't think it was Naudin) who built lifters specifically to see how much payload they could lift, had a big one that could lift something about the size of a soccer ball, and had a video of it lifting the soccerball-thing. I think the confusion with the ion wind thing is that people expect an actual air current-type moving air breeze, but as I understand it the 'ion breeze' emits at the wire and terminates at (being attracted to) the foil and goes no farther?

  • Bottom line, lifters use Ions from either the dielectric air or from ions stripped from the electrodes and causes them to move either in long distance wind form or ion drift.

    Simply put, Ions are formed from matter available and set in motion. The term is Electrokenetics.

    Any theory that supposes that gravity being altered is unsubstantiated.

  • The reason why this occurs is delineated with the requiste equations in SUBQUANTUM KINETICS. Google it.

  • Hence NASAs ion propulsion engine was 10,00 times less efficient than Brown's electrokinetic disc. Under hard vacuum, such as ws achieved in Winston Salem NC at Bahnson Labs, upward force of 110 grams (1.1 newtons) could be achieved for power expenditure of just 0.5 Watt(250,000 Volts times 2 x 10^-6 Amps), or 2,200 newtons of thrust per kiloWatt. That is about 150 tiems the thrust to power ratio of a jet engine. Also, it is 10,000 times greater than the thrust to power of a shuttle main-engine

  • That is Nasa's ion propulsion engine is 10,000 times less efficient than TT Brown's electrokinetic disc.

  • Report by Whitehall Rand ELECTROHYDRODYNAMICS (1960) notes under harder vacuum conditions of 10^-12 mm Hg as in space, Brown's electrokinetic device would be expected to achieve even higer efficiency due to a further reduction in ion leakage power consumption. The report also compared the observed thrust with that of the NASA ion propulsion engine, which weighed 10 times as much as Brown's saucer and produced only 28 grams of force for an input of of 1200 Watts, or just 0.23 newton per kilowatt

  • Purdue a d T. Musha, and Hector Serrano and US army reports all explin why TT Brown the French Govt. the US Army and the US Air Force have shown why they work in a vacuum, and that the force of ion wind is insufficient to cause movement,let alone levitation.

  • Um... your still confusing two separate things. Asymmetrical capacitors do move in a vacuum. But not your lifters.

    It's like you confusing your name with your online alias all over again.

    But the Army Research Lab (my linked pdf below) showed that Ion drift could be sufficient to cause levitation.

  • Beamships are large flying models. Lifters are tiny, inefficient little test devices. I built TT Brown saucers and flew them at 120kV at some tens of microAmps, starting in the 1990s. Bagged, they started to fly BACKWARDS.

  • Purdue University flew Lifters in hard vacuum in September of 2000. Separate tests also show increased efficiency in vacuum, especially with a high-mass-high K-factor dielectric, like Titanium-Dioxide, or Barium-Titanate.

  • "Heavy 'gravitors have replaced led balls suspended on wires. Rotating frames supporting two and four gravitors have made possible acceleration measurements. Molecular gravitators made of solid blocks of massive dielectric have have given still greater efficiency. Rotors and pendulums operating under oil have eliminated atmospheric conditions as to pressure, temperature, and humidity. The effects of ionisation,electron emission have been eliminated"-HOW I CONTROL GRAVITATION, TT Brown,1929

  • Once again "unproven theoretical papers"

    If it could have been done in 1929, then you should be able reproduce the experiment in 2009.

    After all, in science, nothing is true until it is independently verified by reproduction.

  • Why do you think my Beamships (tm) are still after 8-years the largest and most energy-efficient of such devices in the world, in all history (except a 5-meter Japanese design). Research, since 1982, and hard work, and practical experimetn, and talking to EVERYBODY, and meeting and talking with the scientists who actually worked with TT Brown, as I did in 1990, I obtained TT Brown home movies from Sev Bonnie, a scientist who worked with Brown, whom I met in 1990 in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

  • Because your focusing on something that is not debated.

    None of yours (as big or efficient as you have) will ever work in a full vacuum. You have built so many. And whenever someone here asks you to film it flying in a full vacuum, you refer them to unproven theoretical papers or video of something completely different from lifters like an asymmetrical capacitor rotating a few degrees in a vacuum.

  • Brown discovered in Paris during successful vacuum tests sponsored by the French Govt. that ther thrust also persisted even when the capacitor elements in a rotor (such as I built 10-years ago) were each surrounded by plexiglas enclosures. Since ther was no way that ino-wind could escape from the enclosures, ion thrust could be ruled out as a motive force. Barium Titanate placed betwenn the electrodes produced a markedly increased trhust over air or vacuum.

  • Given credence to the Ion Drift force.

    A common misconception is that each air particle would travel all the way from electrode to electrode (like wind would). This is not true, each particle moves only a bit (resulting in collisions.

    But since the electromagnetic field passes through plexiglass, the air doesn't need to travel, the field move each particle independently.

  • That is what ion wind is: MOVING AIR.

    To put into perspective, Brown's electrified disc was almost 100-million times greater than what could reasonably be generated by an ion wind.For example, a thrust of 110-grams(as Brown's 100-gram disc in vacuum) is equal to a force of 10^5 dynes. By comparison, a 2 microAmp ion wind from electrons accelerated in a 250 kV potential would yield a force of only about 10^-3 dynes, almost 100-million times less than the lift produced by Brown's disc.

  • and the proof of this can be found... *drumroll* nowhere!

    you need links man... take out the spaces around the period so you can post them here.

    Noticed how I am the only one providing sources with links from recent studies.

  • No you ae not. I always provide sources from recent studies, and I know personally many of the people who made them, and I reconnected with them 3-weeks ago in Washington SC at COFE III. Actual photos of my work are in books on new energy technology, and you can do the same experiments and see if you get same results I and others got.

  • Okay.. repost something from the last decade.. as I have read Naudin, Brown, Ventura, NASA, and Searl.

    The only ones that do anything in a vacuum are the asymmetrical capacitors that produce angular momentum which is NOT the same as your lifters. I have yet to see a lifter in full vacuum fly. Post a link already.

  • Get ELECTROGRAVITICS II II, by Tom Valone, who hosted COFE III, that I attended 3 weeks ago (Integrity Institute of Washington DC) SECRETS OF ANTIGRAVITY PROPULSION, by my friend and colleague, Dr. PA LaViolette, and I gave you the snail-mail address of the Perdue University energy conversion lab who found as TT Brown and T. Musha and Einstein and Laub and NASA and Hector Serrano did: that these electrogravity devices work BETTER in vacuum, due to less coronal-losses, Voltage can be turned up.

  • William B Stein, "Electrokinetic Propulsion: The Ionic Wind Argument", Purdue University Energy Conversion Lab, Hangar #3, Purdue Airport, West Lafayette, IN 47906, Sept. 5, 2000. Go to foldedspace(dot)com ad search Purdue(dot) doc

  • foldedspace is Gravitec

    Not a credible source for anything. And i cannot search the site for perdue

  • Gravitect and NASA showed in 1999 that the effect works better in vacuum, you can see the video on youtube. And you give up too easily. I never give up. That is why I am a leader in this field for nearly two decades now.

  • Yes, I have seen that several times... I even posted on my uploaded video a link to the NASA report concerning that experiment. The conclusion stated very clearly that the effect was Ions in motion.

    Whether an asymmetrical capacitor stripping its own ions from the electrode material or using air, it still had nothing to do with gravity.

  • That directly conflicts with their report showing that "ions ion motion cannot happen in a vacuum". ions in motion are 100-million times less force than the observed lift and thrust in horizontal-plane, as the US Army report and the ELECTROHYDRODYNAMICs report from 1960, of Electron-Atom corp of BalaCynwyd, PA and Whitehall-Rand. HONDA R & D also agrees, as does my colleague and client, Dr. Ted Loder, who bought one of my kits at the INE symposium in 2002 where I delivered one of my paper.

  • That is why no lifter will fly in a vacuum.

    But those videos showing a asymmetrical capacitor rotating a few degrees could be easily caused by heavy metal ions stripping off even in a vacuum. That's how ion propulsion current works in space.

  • You tell him captain.. be sure to tell him about

    NASA/CR—2004-213312, page 6, paragraph one.

  • Okay, this is actual updated science on the subject.. Better sit down for this one...

    Force on an Asymmetric Capacitor

    by Thomas B. Bahder and Chris Fazi

    Army Research Laboratory

    Adelphi, MD 20783-1197

    arxiv . org/ftp/physics/papers/0211/02­11001 . pdf (remove spaces)

    In this 1960 patent, entitled Electrokinetic Apparatus, Brown gives the clearest explanation of the physics of the Biefeld-Brown effect. Brown makes several important

    statements, including:

    ...

  • • the greatest force on the capacitor is created when the small electrode is positive

    • the effect occurs in a dielectric medium (air)

    • the effect can be used for vehicle propulsion or as a pump of dielectric fluid

    • Browns understanding of the effect, in terms of ionic motion

    • the detailed physics of the effect is not understood

    In the following, we reproduce Browns first two figures

    This means even TTBrown is against your claims of not needing air.

  • They clearly state in the Badher Fazi paper FORCE ON AN ASYMMETRIC CAPACITOR:" A simple upper limit on the ion wind force shows that the ion wind effect is a factor of at least 3 orders of magnitude too small." Do you have ANY idea how much an order of magnitued is? it is followed by accepted equations showing why this is so.

  • The US Army report by Badher and Fazi also states: "If the capacitor is surrounded by vacuum(rather than a dielectric, such as air), the net force F on the asymmetric capacitor can be computed by the sum of two surface integgrals, one surface of the negative electrode (4th equation), where E is the electric field due to charges on the ionised air between electrodes(excluding the field due to surface-charges on the capacitor electrodes."

  • Now ask yourself "why would surface integrals be needed"?

    Because, as explained on page 12, there is a force based on ions stripped of the electrodes.

    That is how REAL ion drives work in space. By creating ions from on-board materials and accelerating them in one direction.

  • This report also gives the requiste equations and further states: " Again,this value is at least 3 orders of magnitude too small to account for lifting a capacitor with mass of 3-5 grams. Therefore, the ionic wind contribution is too small, by at least 3 orders of magnitude to account for the observed force on the asymmetric capacitor."

  • Ah... you fell right into the logical fallacy of counting hits while ignoring the misses.

    You seem not mention that the paper says that Ionic drift could indeed account for the force.

    And when I claim it is "Ionic Wind", I encompass both drift and wind (check my posts from several months back).

    "the interplay between the dynamics of ionization of the air in the high-field region surrounding the electrodes and charge transport"

    Is isn't wind really but people can understand it as air moving.

  • Even better: NASA/CR—2004-213312, page 6, paragraph one. And shocker of shockers: at Gravitec's website they have the report that NASA sources for their 2004 conclusion.. google 'gravitec inc data talley', download the pdf and read the conclusions on page 91. Robert L Talley concludes it's just reacting to the chamber. Of course someone like Mythbusters could try to videotape ...WHOOPS!! they did!! Doggone it, I need my evening zotz of Tesla beam.

  • youtube . com / watch?v=Jk2GGoMJ7NU

    The scammers that sell these lifters love to quote and reference REAL experiments into electrostatic motion. But they come up with their own conclusions. Like Beamshipcaptain does. Every serious experimenter has concluded that it WILL NOT WORK IN A VACUUM.

  • Why would they not work in a vacuum? THis is how VACUUM TUBES work! -Woodward James,"Flux Capacitors and the Origin of Inertia," FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS V.34,2004, p.1475,Purdue flew lifters in hard vacuum- William B Stein,"Electrokinetic Propulsion, THe Ionic Wind Argument", Purdue University Energy Conversion Lab,Hangar #3, Purdue Airport, West Lafayette, IN 47906,Sept.5,2000.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • William B. Stein, "Electrokinetic Propulsion: The Ionic Wind Argument, Purdue University Energy Conversion Lab, Hangar #3, Purdue Airport, West Lafayette, IN 47906, Sept. 5, 2000, Graham and Lahoz, "Observation of Static Electromagnetic Angular Momentum in Vacuo," NATURE,V. 285, May 15,1980, p. 129.

  • Always an angular momentum paper never something that lifts... Hmmm, I wonder why.

  • Purdue University Flew Lifters in hard vacuum, in 2000, after I flew heavy sheet metal 1-meter diameter TT Brwon flying saucers, bagged, and naked, on only a few watts of electrical energy, in clear violation of the 1st law of Thermodynamics; more motion is created than is proportianally input in energy-units.

  • Demonstration witnessed June 24, 2000, in Reno, Nevada, before an audience of scientists and military-people. I replicated TT Brown's patent US Pat # 2,949,550, and of course it worked much better than claimed in the patent, in the 1990s, here in Pennsylvania.

  • and your proof of this is... nowhere to be found.

  • I am sure that the "Impersonation" term in the rules refers to pretending to be Actual personalities in real life. Not impersonating some other unknown poster.

    For example, if someone claimed to be Cher and her Official Youtube page and started uploading videos of Cher, etc. That would be grounds for account deletion.

    Just because you have been posting on youtube for years doesn't entitle you to rights to the name "Beamshipcaptain" or any other variation.

  • Using a similar name to another person is impersonation, according to youtube. Plus this crazy-person actually has the gall to use my real name on one of his fraudulent sites, and then tries to sound as crazy as possible, even contacts MY friends, passing himself off as me using my real name. That is a crime.

  • "has the gall to use my real name on one of his fraudulent sites" -Beamshipcaptain

    Are you saying that he found out your real name (the one on your birth certificate)? Or are you so deluded that you think "Beamshipcaptain" IS really your name.

    *must have been a rough childhood beamy*

  • He us using my Surname and Christian name. And representing himself to people as me. Which is fraudulent.

  • Is your surname Beam? And what do you mean by "Christian" name?

  • Christian name is your LAST name. My name is Russell Anderson, and I can provide a Birth Certificate from May, 1961,Drivers License that you may check with Motor Vehicles, as well as images that prove I am who I say I am, and bibligraphical references with my work and professor Searl's websites have my photo and photos of some of my work from a decade ago. This impersonator can provide no such proof of ID, nor any references at all.

  • so how does "Russell Anderson" sound, spell or is pronounced ANYTHING like "Beamshipcaptain"

    ????

    Did he ever say that he was "Russell Anderson"? Not that I have seen, I have looked at his posts. Funny stuff too.

    You have an alias here on youtube. No law protects your right to have that alias.

    An "Alias" is by definition, NOT YOUR REAL IDENTITY. That's like someone stealing your fake I.D. with the name "McLovin" on it.

  • He has stated his name on his channes as Russell or Russell anderson, and I have had more than one person tell me privately that he has approached them using my first, or first and last name, which he lists as his own on some of his fraudulent channels. He certainly has said he is me on his posts. Scroll down. The fact that you are defending him shows you are as crazy as he is.

  • The fact that you are defending him shows that I just don't like you. Which is more plausible I think. But I am willing to discuss it with you so I am.

  • "The fact that you are defending him shows that I just don't like you. Which is more plausible I think. But I am willing to discuss it with you so I am".-Joviocoe, Oct.27,2009.

    I let this statement stand for the entire community to see. It speaks for itself; I rest my case.

  • What case? The fact that I don't like you is not news, controversial, nor grounds for legal action. I don't expect you like me either.

    Nothing in the Youtube rulebook says we have to like each other. Yet we can still argue our respective points effectively.

  • I never said I don't like you (it is not a matter of like or dislike, such issues never come up in science, which is always unemotional and unbiased). But I don't have too much patience with people who simply use invective, and are skeptical to a fault, and refuse to do research, and expect to be spoonfed every bit of research, when I used to spend DAYS in the library researching this stuff, DECADES before the internet. You have it easy today. Try this line of experimet yourself. And see...

  • Your right about me having it easy. The multitude of information at my googling fingertips.

    The point is simple, you are making the claim of electrogravity and I am the skeptic.

    YOU have the burden of proof! Not me. When I claim a positive statement, then I will have to do the research. But my statements are negative (meaning I don't assert a preposition) while your statements are positive because you claim to have new theory of gravity as it relates to electricity.

  • The future always belongs to the doer-s, NOT the idle-dreamers, and never the skeptics. The skeptical scientist of 1902 said "Man would not fly for a thousand years". Going to the moon was "impossible" in the 1940s. Technological progress is the result of inventing NEW systems, not perfecting old ones. We go around the world 500-times faster than in Columbus' time not because we have boats that go 500-times faster, but because we have spacecraft. In Columbus' time no one could imagine spacecraft

  • Common pseudoscience used by many scammers (not calling you one)

    Skeptics said this, skeptics said that, and they were wrong. So you must be wrong.

    Notice they usually bring up the generality rather that a specific theory.

    I don't say that electricity will not enable us to fly through space (the generality), but I do say, what you built will not. Or your particular theory holds no water.

    See the difference?

  • This is no scam. That is the difference. A scam will sooner or later be exposed as such, but this technology of field effect propulsion, or gravity control, goes back over 100 years, to pioneers such as George S. Piggott, and many others in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it. The history of science and innovation is a history of many times slow acceptace of controversial ideas.

  • Well I didn't call your theory a scam... Unsubstantial, yes, but scam, no.

  • It's NOT my theory. I just helped to do some research and practical experimetn, and I built and flew the largest and heaviest TT Brown saucers in the world in 1999, none that size had flown since 1960 (publicly). I am not new to this work. Tim Ventura was new to this work. But he dropped out of sight, sadly, a victim of depression, divorce, and alcoholism. Tortise and the hare.

  • No, it's a scam, I should know, I am in on it. WHOOPS!! Talk about letting the cat out of the bag!! I should know not to open my big keyboard until I've had my morning Tesla shock therapy. It worked wonders for him, he tore up the contract that would've made him the world's first trillionaire. All us Beamship guys are way smarter, though. We keep our secret tech under wraps and just use red herrings to confuse people. Amazing what gobbledegook people will believe.

  • And you are fooling noone.There is no secret tech we keep under wraps, and you are a fraud, impersonator and everyone can see that you have self-esteem issues.

  • Howdy captain!! (slaps him on the back, very much in a hail-fellow-well-met manner) Gee I missed you. Been busy overseas seeing to 'affairs' (ahem). Still here in fabulous Macau; oh you should see the sights. The Chinese have some great ideas about lifters, you betcha. I paid our respects at Dr. Tsien's (now spelled Xuesen) memorial service, he was great man of rocketry and science. Did wonders for space programs. Hie thee skyward, Dr. Tsien/Xuesen's spirit, we all love thee. So how's tricks?