@psyjpg Well TWA800 has one "official" and one "unofficial" scenarios. The fmc was definitely not a factor in either scenario, though. The official scenario was that fuel vapor built up in the center tank and was ignited by faulty wiring, which is why now all commercial a/c designed after TWA800, and also many built prior to have been retrofitted, with nitrogen generators that continuously pump nitrogen into the tanks to "supress" the vapors and take up the
@psyjpg empty space in the tanks as the fuel level decreases. Nitrogen is used because its an inert gas and non-flamable. The "unofficial" scenario was that a U.S. military missle struck the plane and caused the crash. The supporting evidence for this theory was that A) Flt 800 was in/close to a known military testing/practicing area which is technically restricted airspace B) numerous witnesses reported seeing a streaking light with a tell-tale vapor stream/smoke tail behind it and C)
@psyjpg Many mechanics/NTSB/FAA investigators, including a few that I know personally and a few that I currently or have worked with claim that when they were piecing back the aircraft together during the investigation in the hangar, the explosion damage in the belly/fuselage was pointed inward, rather then outward which points more to an object striking/penetrating and then exploding rather then an outward explosion one would expect to see from an explosion occuring from the inside out
@psyjpg honestly, I don't know which one to believe, nor do I care all that much....Its kinda up there with the 9/11 conspiracy theories...good points raised, but still kind of unbelievable at any rate, lol. Fact is plane went boom and hit the ground, or rather ocean in this case. End of facts. As for USAir 427, I'm not familiar off hand with it. I'll research and read into it and get back to you, but at any rate I dont recall of ever hearing of a major accident due to an FMS failure or error
@psyjpg Ok just briefly looked it up and immediately knew which one you were talking about, just didnt remember the flt number or recall that it was USAir.....Its called a rudder hard-over....There are 3 axis of flight....lateral, longitudinal, and vertical....Lateral control is controlled by elevators and is most commonly called pitch.. Longitudinal is bank and ailerons control it....last is vertical which is yaw and controlled by the rudder....the rudder was jammed by a boeing design fault and
@psyjpg Ok just briefly looked it up and immediately knew which one you were talking about, just didnt remember the flt number or recall that it was USAir.....Its called a rudder hard-over....There are 3 axis of flight....lateral, longitudinal, and vertical....Lateral control is controlled by elevators and is most commonly called pitch.. Longitudinal is bank and ailerons control it....last is vertical which is yaw and controlled by the rudder....the rudder was jammed by a boeing design fault and
@JAPToxicity a faulty valve in the rudder actuator...The rudder was jammed to full extension in one direction (dont remember which, sorry, and I refuse to rely on wikipedia for accuracy) and basically when that happens the a/c will yaw so much that it flips inverted and nose dives due to DCF or "Departure from controlled flight" or in english, lol, the pilot lost control. Usually you can try to correct this but in this case and a few other 737 accidents, it was impossible to move the rudder back
to neutral or counter the spin because the only actuator was jammed....boeing did a mod on all the rudders and a new design for future 737s with the addition of a second actuator to overcome the first actuator if it failed and also a new actuator design all together to prevent *hopefully* any actuator from jamming in the first place.....I only remembered this cause we talked about it in A&P school and also I remember my dad talking about it to me alot, too (he's an ex a/c mechanic and now an FAA
@JAPToxicity Excellent answers! I remember when I first heard about TWA800 in the summer of 96 and wondered what the truth behind that accident was. I guess we still really don't know. When you get a chance, look into EgyptAir 990. That's another one of those that doesn't make sense. Maybe looking at the data from the recorders you'll "see" something. Ditto Airfrance 447.
@psyjpg lol, those are pretty famous accidents as well....EgyptAir 990 was caused a suicidal co-pilot based on the cvr recordings and an apparent over looked design flaw in the elevator control cable rigging.....the co-pilot and captain's yokes had inadvertantly been designed that if one pushed forward and the other pulled back, the elevators would split, as in one elevator would go down and the other would go up...but no one foresaw this happening because why would they push/pull opposite each
@psyjpg other if they were trying to correct a problem? obviously they would/should be trying to work together to stabilize the aircraft. The original reason for this design was so that if a yoke or elevator jammed they could use the other to correct.....infact if the capatin had caught the copilot sooner (The suicidal copilot had pushed the aircraft into a dive while the captain was outside the cockpit for a few minutes) he might have been able to pull out in time...
@psyjpg boeing corrected that now by rigging the cam to shear if the controls are pushed/pulled in opposite directions with only one (i believe the captains, but not sure...) to maintain control of the elevators......As for AirFrance 447 the jury is still out, but preliminary reports are suggesting a complete failure of the pitot-static system due to icing and fault anti-icing equipment installed on the pitot tubes/static ports. If those reports are correct, then the pilots would have no
@psyjpg reference as to their altitude or airspeed. In a cessna 152 going 100 knots on a clear day that would mean absolutely jack, lol, but these guys were in a high performance commercial airplane at night in turbulent weather.....and the problem is that they wouldnt know if they were losing/gaining airspeed or desending or climbing...and the higher you go, the smaller the "envelope", or performance limitations margin of errors acceptable get....the slightest decrease in speed can cause you to
@psyjpg stall and even, as weird as it seems, the slightest increase in speed can cause a high speed stall or a phenomenon known as "mach tuck" to happen....for example at say 5,000 ft your envelope might be 140 knts stall and 600 knts high speed stall.....but at 36,000 ft it might be 420 knts stall and 450 knts high speed stall....and thats what they believed happen....they either had a regular stall and broke up, or the leading belief is mach tuck, where the aircraft actually noses over from
@JAPToxicity Wow - never heard of that phenomenon. Sounds then, like you wouldn't want to fly very high then given those risks. It also concerns me that with Fly-By-Wire the computer flies the plane, essentially. What happens if the computer freezes up or otherwise malfunctions? Those joysticks would be useless in terms of the flight control surfaces where as at least with a hydraulic failure you can still kind of control the plane. Since you did so well with these accidents >
8500...8600...8700...8800...8900...9000...OMFG IT'S OVER 9000!!!... wait a second why am I counting from 9000 feet? Oh yeah, its because I just wanted to say it's over 9000!
Engine one on fire... Engine two on fire... Engine three on fire... Engine four on fire... Engine five on fire... Oh wait nvm there is no engine five, you're screwed. Goodbye and have a great day!
Descend, Descend now... Do a barrel roll, Do a barrel roll now.
V-1 refers to a visibility of "1 mile" and depends on whether you are flying VFR. During stormy conditions the F/O may with to use the outer marker as a reference point for the localizer since glideslope is usually about 3 deg.
@insightsSAFG I thought V1 was the speed of which you are committed to takeoff, as there would not be enough runway should you decide to abort take off at that speed.
@insightsSAFG Yeh, and yes, the glide slope is usualy 3 degrees, Although, there are some airports (London City for example) which have steeper glideslopes, due to certain circumstances etc.
@insightsSAFG Actually in the U.S. V-1 is the max speed at which the pilot is able to stop the aircraft during takeoff roll...its also known as "Take off decision speed" or, once exceeding/exceed, "passing the point of rejection"...the next callout would be Vr, or "rotate", which is the the speed at which the aircraft can actually lift off without stalling.
@psyjpg yeah, most v speeds are given in IAS especially on large aircraft, and Vr and V1 speeds vary aircraft to aircraft and are calculated based on aircraft weight at takeoff, air density/ ground elevation, length of runway, and a whole bunch of other factors.
@psyjpg On commercial aircraft the fmc (flight management computer) automatically calculates these and other v speeds and thrust settings and puts the corresponding "speed bugs" on the airspeed inicator and engine epr instruments so the pilots know what speed the v speeds are and what position/thrust setting to move the throttles to
@apascaner I believe the "climb/decend now" one is new. It's issued when a RA is reversed, typically when the other pilot doesn't follow /their/ RA (see "2002 Überlingen mid-air collision" on Wikipedia). For example, if your instruction was to "climb, climb" but the other pilot then started to climb as well, TCAS would issue you a "descend, descend now" instruction, which would emphasize it's telling you to do the opposite of what it said in the first place.
and why cant they just get a hawt girl to say all of these things and then record them for the computer systems-less annoying but i do suppose this gets ur attention easily lol
When an aircraft is pressurized, the cabin is pressurized to an equivalent altitude. So, the air outside is, say, 30,000 feet but the air inside is pressurized to an equivalent of 6,000 feet. If there is a major leak in the airplane, then the cabin will depressurize and equalize to the outside air. When the cabin passes the equivalent of 10,000 feet, this aural warning will go off in an MD-11 (I dunno about the MD-80 though). When you are in a plane, the cabin has an "altitude" so to speak.
The rate at which the cabin pressurizes or depressurizes is called the "cabin vertical speed."
You definitely don't wanna hear "cabin altitude" being chirped at you during flight at 30,000 feet, because chances are you'll have a buncha panicky passengers when all those oxygen masks pop down :-P after the cabin altitude hits 14,000 feet (and a bunch of pissed off mechanics: they gotta replace ALL of the oxygen generators!)
@aerlingus231 whether or not you got them from different videos or not makes little difference. Those call outs from the co-pilot are from the PMDG MD-11
WTH? STABILIZER BULLSHIT? HOW THE HELL IS BULLSHIT!
danielseah01 1 week ago
ugh 1:43
MrFlyguy124 1 month ago
Yeah, if these are going off like this all at the same time, you are (or will be) having a VERY bad day..
NateTheGreatPilot 2 months ago 2
All right look idiot, DECEND NOW OR YOU DIE!!!!!!
MrFlyguy124 2 months ago
What makes you think TWA800 was shot down? Wasn't the problem with the center fuel tank?
psyjpg 2 months ago
@psyjpg Well TWA800 has one "official" and one "unofficial" scenarios. The fmc was definitely not a factor in either scenario, though. The official scenario was that fuel vapor built up in the center tank and was ignited by faulty wiring, which is why now all commercial a/c designed after TWA800, and also many built prior to have been retrofitted, with nitrogen generators that continuously pump nitrogen into the tanks to "supress" the vapors and take up the
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
@psyjpg empty space in the tanks as the fuel level decreases. Nitrogen is used because its an inert gas and non-flamable. The "unofficial" scenario was that a U.S. military missle struck the plane and caused the crash. The supporting evidence for this theory was that A) Flt 800 was in/close to a known military testing/practicing area which is technically restricted airspace B) numerous witnesses reported seeing a streaking light with a tell-tale vapor stream/smoke tail behind it and C)
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
@psyjpg Many mechanics/NTSB/FAA investigators, including a few that I know personally and a few that I currently or have worked with claim that when they were piecing back the aircraft together during the investigation in the hangar, the explosion damage in the belly/fuselage was pointed inward, rather then outward which points more to an object striking/penetrating and then exploding rather then an outward explosion one would expect to see from an explosion occuring from the inside out
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
@psyjpg honestly, I don't know which one to believe, nor do I care all that much....Its kinda up there with the 9/11 conspiracy theories...good points raised, but still kind of unbelievable at any rate, lol. Fact is plane went boom and hit the ground, or rather ocean in this case. End of facts. As for USAir 427, I'm not familiar off hand with it. I'll research and read into it and get back to you, but at any rate I dont recall of ever hearing of a major accident due to an FMS failure or error
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
@psyjpg Ok just briefly looked it up and immediately knew which one you were talking about, just didnt remember the flt number or recall that it was USAir.....Its called a rudder hard-over....There are 3 axis of flight....lateral, longitudinal, and vertical....Lateral control is controlled by elevators and is most commonly called pitch.. Longitudinal is bank and ailerons control it....last is vertical which is yaw and controlled by the rudder....the rudder was jammed by a boeing design fault and
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
@psyjpg Ok just briefly looked it up and immediately knew which one you were talking about, just didnt remember the flt number or recall that it was USAir.....Its called a rudder hard-over....There are 3 axis of flight....lateral, longitudinal, and vertical....Lateral control is controlled by elevators and is most commonly called pitch.. Longitudinal is bank and ailerons control it....last is vertical which is yaw and controlled by the rudder....the rudder was jammed by a boeing design fault and
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
@JAPToxicity a faulty valve in the rudder actuator...The rudder was jammed to full extension in one direction (dont remember which, sorry, and I refuse to rely on wikipedia for accuracy) and basically when that happens the a/c will yaw so much that it flips inverted and nose dives due to DCF or "Departure from controlled flight" or in english, lol, the pilot lost control. Usually you can try to correct this but in this case and a few other 737 accidents, it was impossible to move the rudder back
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
to neutral or counter the spin because the only actuator was jammed....boeing did a mod on all the rudders and a new design for future 737s with the addition of a second actuator to overcome the first actuator if it failed and also a new actuator design all together to prevent *hopefully* any actuator from jamming in the first place.....I only remembered this cause we talked about it in A&P school and also I remember my dad talking about it to me alot, too (he's an ex a/c mechanic and now an FAA
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
inspector). Anyway bud, hope I answered your questions and wasn't too boring/complicated...
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
@JAPToxicity Excellent answers! I remember when I first heard about TWA800 in the summer of 96 and wondered what the truth behind that accident was. I guess we still really don't know. When you get a chance, look into EgyptAir 990. That's another one of those that doesn't make sense. Maybe looking at the data from the recorders you'll "see" something. Ditto Airfrance 447.
psyjpg 2 months ago
@psyjpg lol, those are pretty famous accidents as well....EgyptAir 990 was caused a suicidal co-pilot based on the cvr recordings and an apparent over looked design flaw in the elevator control cable rigging.....the co-pilot and captain's yokes had inadvertantly been designed that if one pushed forward and the other pulled back, the elevators would split, as in one elevator would go down and the other would go up...but no one foresaw this happening because why would they push/pull opposite each
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
@psyjpg other if they were trying to correct a problem? obviously they would/should be trying to work together to stabilize the aircraft. The original reason for this design was so that if a yoke or elevator jammed they could use the other to correct.....infact if the capatin had caught the copilot sooner (The suicidal copilot had pushed the aircraft into a dive while the captain was outside the cockpit for a few minutes) he might have been able to pull out in time...
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
@psyjpg boeing corrected that now by rigging the cam to shear if the controls are pushed/pulled in opposite directions with only one (i believe the captains, but not sure...) to maintain control of the elevators......As for AirFrance 447 the jury is still out, but preliminary reports are suggesting a complete failure of the pitot-static system due to icing and fault anti-icing equipment installed on the pitot tubes/static ports. If those reports are correct, then the pilots would have no
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
@psyjpg reference as to their altitude or airspeed. In a cessna 152 going 100 knots on a clear day that would mean absolutely jack, lol, but these guys were in a high performance commercial airplane at night in turbulent weather.....and the problem is that they wouldnt know if they were losing/gaining airspeed or desending or climbing...and the higher you go, the smaller the "envelope", or performance limitations margin of errors acceptable get....the slightest decrease in speed can cause you to
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
@psyjpg stall and even, as weird as it seems, the slightest increase in speed can cause a high speed stall or a phenomenon known as "mach tuck" to happen....for example at say 5,000 ft your envelope might be 140 knts stall and 600 knts high speed stall.....but at 36,000 ft it might be 420 knts stall and 450 knts high speed stall....and thats what they believed happen....they either had a regular stall and broke up, or the leading belief is mach tuck, where the aircraft actually noses over from
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
@psyjpg too much speed and flips on its back....kinda like an upside down 180....and then broke up from stress....
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
@JAPToxicity Wow - never heard of that phenomenon. Sounds then, like you wouldn't want to fly very high then given those risks. It also concerns me that with Fly-By-Wire the computer flies the plane, essentially. What happens if the computer freezes up or otherwise malfunctions? Those joysticks would be useless in terms of the flight control surfaces where as at least with a hydraulic failure you can still kind of control the plane. Since you did so well with these accidents >
psyjpg 2 months ago
Comment removed
psyjpg 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JAPToxicity > thus far, I'll give you a more difficult accident to look at: Aeroperu 603.
psyjpg 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
8500...8600...8700...8800...8900...9000...OMFG IT'S OVER 9000!!!... wait a second why am I counting from 9000 feet? Oh yeah, its because I just wanted to say it's over 9000!
Engine one on fire... Engine two on fire... Engine three on fire... Engine four on fire... Engine five on fire... Oh wait nvm there is no engine five, you're screwed. Goodbye and have a great day!
Descend, Descend now... Do a barrel roll, Do a barrel roll now.
1lann 2 months ago
Comment removed
1lann 2 months ago
Comment removed
1lann 2 months ago
V-1 refers to a visibility of "1 mile" and depends on whether you are flying VFR. During stormy conditions the F/O may with to use the outer marker as a reference point for the localizer since glideslope is usually about 3 deg.
insightsSAFG 3 months ago
@insightsSAFG I thought V1 was the speed of which you are committed to takeoff, as there would not be enough runway should you decide to abort take off at that speed.
scotplane 3 months ago
@scotplane You are talking about take-off, right? Is glideslope typically 3 deg.?
insightsSAFG 3 months ago
@insightsSAFG Yeh, and yes, the glide slope is usualy 3 degrees, Although, there are some airports (London City for example) which have steeper glideslopes, due to certain circumstances etc.
scotplane 3 months ago
@scotplane steeper than 3 degrees? Doesn't that mean at some point the passengers are going to be able to feel the descent?
psyjpg 3 months ago
@scotplane Unless you hit the brakes really hard...
psyjpg 2 months ago
@insightsSAFG Actually in the U.S. V-1 is the max speed at which the pilot is able to stop the aircraft during takeoff roll...its also known as "Take off decision speed" or, once exceeding/exceed, "passing the point of rejection"...the next callout would be Vr, or "rotate", which is the the speed at which the aircraft can actually lift off without stalling.
JAPToxicity 3 months ago
@JAPToxicity What speed is Vr? Are we talking IAS?
psyjpg 2 months ago
@psyjpg yeah, most v speeds are given in IAS especially on large aircraft, and Vr and V1 speeds vary aircraft to aircraft and are calculated based on aircraft weight at takeoff, air density/ ground elevation, length of runway, and a whole bunch of other factors.
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
@psyjpg On commercial aircraft the fmc (flight management computer) automatically calculates these and other v speeds and thrust settings and puts the corresponding "speed bugs" on the airspeed inicator and engine epr instruments so the pilots know what speed the v speeds are and what position/thrust setting to move the throttles to
JAPToxicity 2 months ago
@JAPToxicity What do you suppose happend to USAir 427 and TWA800? Was the fmc involved in either of those crashes?
psyjpg 2 months ago
@psyjpg
TWA 800 was shot down by a surface to air missile.
eaterofclams 2 months ago
Comment removed
planesareawsome 3 months ago
1:45 "Ffflllaaaaapss"
planesareawsome 3 months ago
haha MD-11
HoustonToDinosaur 3 months ago
I lierally used this as my new messege ringtone
rewindablender 3 months ago
0:09
Is it bad that I expected to hear "SOUND BARRIER"?
HarvestmanMan 3 months ago in playlist HarvestmanMan's favorites
mdd
11 owns
otisman1000 3 months ago
I love the WHOOP WHOOP PULL UP HAHAHAHAH
otisman1000 3 months ago
What is the aircraft near 1:18 please? Thank you.
Raider1Suisse 4 months ago
@Raider1Suisse Boeing 737
kobhalt94 4 months ago
@Raider1Suisse looks like a b737 NG
joshuaspolar 4 months ago
I know the computer is telling the pilot "DON'T SINK" but it reallt sounds like "DON'T THINK"
marutidriver 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
music to my ears
eporter719 5 months ago
fast minimun call in md11 is funny hell
Kpj7466 5 months ago
MD11 has the best one
bajesus666 6 months ago
Fuh-LAAAAAP
BlueKewne 6 months ago 10
is it flaps overspeed of slats overspeed
thomsonfly645k 6 months ago
why do they have to edit the voice so most of the voices have no accent?!
TheMadspy300 7 months ago
@TheMadspy300 so you cant be distracted by the voices
henkiehenken 3 months ago
@henkiehenken I thought it would be everybody can understand it...
TheMadspy300 3 months ago
@TheMadspy300 also but if you have a russian saying things it is hard to concentrate because it is funy
henkiehenken 3 months ago
Can You Send me a Link of where you got the sounds
jsschultz515 7 months ago
Whhat is that plane at 1:20 ?
TheMadspy300 7 months ago
@TheMadspy300
Boeing 747-8
GiulianoMagno 7 months ago
@GiulianoMagno Thx
TheMadspy300 7 months ago
Comment removed
propeng1 8 months ago
The silent microlight at the end peace at last.
phreak761 8 months ago
the MD-11 bitichin betty voice makes me want to rip my hair out.
drbackjack 8 months ago
1:04 - 1:15 you don't want to hear that when flying a MD-11 :D
tagtraeumerL96A1 8 months ago
wouldn't we be screwed if there was an engine 4 fire?
trepo757 8 months ago
2:41 captions says:
cropping rainfall from convertibles??
Devilsoldier95 8 months ago
1.43 "stabilizer bullshit"???
Devilsoldier95 8 months ago 20
@Devilsoldier95 LOOOOOOOOOOOOOL :D
It's actually stabilizer motion, but I've never heard someone say that before. XD
scotplane 3 months ago
@Devilsoldier95 * 1:43
chasedrgc1223 3 months ago
@Devilsoldier95 Stabilizer motion. Not good in any case during IFR flight.
MrFlyguy124 2 months ago
It is funny when the MD-11 calls you " SLAT " !!!!!!
HAHAHA great video thanks for sharing
avaitionnerd111 8 months ago
2:20 angry cockpit voice: "Descenddd now.... mother fucker!!!"
apascaner 8 months ago 12
@apascaner I believe the "climb/decend now" one is new. It's issued when a RA is reversed, typically when the other pilot doesn't follow /their/ RA (see "2002 Überlingen mid-air collision" on Wikipedia). For example, if your instruction was to "climb, climb" but the other pilot then started to climb as well, TCAS would issue you a "descend, descend now" instruction, which would emphasize it's telling you to do the opposite of what it said in the first place.
zorak950 3 months ago
Can you list all of the different planes that you got these voices from? Thanks!
-P.S. I don't think they're annoying
Vanool35 9 months ago
Data like their college. 1:48
LegoAir 9 months ago
The last few are from Honeywell.
douro20 9 months ago
0:17 the video says don't sink and the captions say don't panic...
coincidence...i think not
zombieguy225 10 months ago
The ones startin at about 2:00 sounds like my mom.
Descend, descend, Descend...DESCEND NOW.
evanellis 10 months ago 3
Captions...
1:43
"Black poverty."
xD
evanellis 10 months ago
LOL the captions!
MrFlyguy124 10 months ago
It's called "Bitching Betty"
MrFlyguy124 10 months ago
Turn on the captions.. 0:17 Don't Panic lol
5IrFaN5 10 months ago
just like a chick, always nagging...
RellyOhBoy 10 months ago
1:15 -1:18 sounds like my office phone ringing
229wazup 10 months ago
i love the sounds from the MD-11...it sounds like the computer from the starship enterprise...:D
NFreund 11 months ago
I don't want to fly with the pilot who considers WHOOP WHOOP PULL UP TERRAIN an everyday sound.
evangelion53 11 months ago
Even computer women nag men
Cerberus957 11 months ago
1:49 flllllap :P
Deltapilot96 11 months ago
The first 30 secs seem like the sounds are from pmSounds
dogzout 11 months ago
Freakin FS Copilot lol
HawaiianAviator 11 months ago
1:01 sounds like my ringtone :D
TheHighflyeroflondon 1 year ago
and why cant they just get a hawt girl to say all of these things and then record them for the computer systems-less annoying but i do suppose this gets ur attention easily lol
comicalstuffnn 1 year ago
I like the Yugoslav airlines-707, right?
comicalstuffnn 1 year ago
i love these sounds.
legomaster335 1 year ago
0:08 ......SOUND BARRIER!
HarvestmanMan 1 year ago
BINIMUMS
BINIMUMS
BINIMUMS
HarvestmanMan 1 year ago
Sounds like Microsoft Sam sometimes..
DeeZanic 1 year ago
pull up pull up whoop whoop
Mueiwark 1 year ago
thats my ring tone
jimmyvbs 1 year ago
The MD-80 ones starting at :50 are hilarious.
*NEE NEE* Brakes.
*NEE NEE* Fuullll-APS.
*NEE NEE* FLAPS.
evanellis 1 year ago
Aproching minimum. Minimum. Flap overspeed. *FARRRRRRRT* Stablizer motion.
Brakes...
lordgman1 1 year ago
MD-11 PMDG !!!! I love it but what is this alarm " Stabilizer caution" ????
jajawin06 1 year ago
Yikes! 3 engine fires + headache = painful landing...
TheGamerDude365 1 year ago
now i think the word " SLAT !!! "
SOUND LIKE SOMTHING ELSE i think tou know what i mean
hahah
thanks for uploading
good to see aircraft cockpit warnings
on youtube
avaitionnerd111 1 year ago
the most is from pmdg 744 md-11 and flight 1 super 80
ShamrockFront 1 year ago
descend descend, descend...... DESCEND NOW!!!!!!
drummerboy5192 1 year ago 3
I just ignore in FSX. I know Im about to crash. Just like I freaking know I disconnected the autopilot, you dont have to annoy me.
macsrule94 1 year ago
I annoy my friends with these warnings, it's not a big surprise to me that I'm the only one who thinks it's funny.
chackles82 1 year ago
Ah, yes. b!tchin betty. Nice to hear from you again (NOT)
DV5230US 1 year ago
when im flying all i can thinking is MAKE IT STOP
datafreak667 1 year ago
Someone needs to make a remix out of this
TonyAirlines 1 year ago
craaap this is annoying!
Allexxx96Reloaded 1 year ago
What does "Cabin Altitude" mean?
InvaderZim871 1 year ago
When an aircraft is pressurized, the cabin is pressurized to an equivalent altitude. So, the air outside is, say, 30,000 feet but the air inside is pressurized to an equivalent of 6,000 feet. If there is a major leak in the airplane, then the cabin will depressurize and equalize to the outside air. When the cabin passes the equivalent of 10,000 feet, this aural warning will go off in an MD-11 (I dunno about the MD-80 though). When you are in a plane, the cabin has an "altitude" so to speak.
YoMomSaddam 1 year ago
Comment removed
YoMomSaddam 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The rate at which the cabin pressurizes or depressurizes is called the "cabin vertical speed."
You definitely don't wanna hear "cabin altitude" being chirped at you during flight at 30,000 feet, because chances are you'll have a buncha panicky passengers when all those oxygen masks pop down :-P after the cabin altitude hits 14,000 feet (and a bunch of pissed off mechanics: they gotta replace ALL of the oxygen generators!)
YoMomSaddam 1 year ago
FLLLLLLLAPS
InvaderZim871 1 year ago
in soviet russia airplane crashes you
HelloWorld492 1 year ago
Computer: "Don't sink".
Pilot: "What the fuck do you think i'm gonna do crash it into the ground?"
BEYATCH :)
IHI4ZZx 1 year ago
@IHI4ZZx Computer: "Climb, climb, climb, CLIMB NOW
Pilot: "Do it yourself beyatch!!!!!!"
Computer: "Descent, descent, Climb, climb, increase descent."
Pilot: "BITCH WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU WANT ME TO DO, I CAN'T BREAK THIS PLANE IN HALF!!!!!! IS IT UP OR DOWN??????
Computer: "Clear of conflict"
Pilot: "NO we still have a conflict!!! Wait till we touch the ground" XD :P
jlts56379 1 year ago 13
@jlts56379 Pilot to ground engineer- " I'm requesting a repair for the tcas.is driving me mad!!" LOL
Kpj7466 5 months ago
''Fifty Forthy Thirty Twenty Retard Retard''
DetEJagDe 1 year ago 2
Descend! Descend! Descend!........Descend NOW!
GameDude41 1 year ago
Can you get these sounds for Flight sim
fox11201 1 year ago
If I had a copilot who messed with everything like that, I would smack him. Good video :)
airman193 1 year ago
too low gear xdd
tomek1158 1 year ago
Comment removed
fskoch 1 year ago
@fskoch Go die you Nazi. The MD-11 is my favourite. >:D
n787mx 1 year ago
@n787mx why i'm an nazi?
fskoch 1 year ago
@n787mx why i'm an nazi? and i need to die?
fskoch 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
--Anybody know a website on-which there are .mp3 &/or .wav files of Betties? I know there was one I visited about a year ago but, I can't find it.
I've had a great deal of difficulty finding that sort of thing, via search engine
ChesterfeildVanderG 1 year ago
--Anybody know a website on-which there are .mp3 &/or .wav files of Betties? I know there was one I visited about a year ago but, I can't find it.
I've had a great deal of difficulty finding that sort of thing, via search engine
ChesterfeildVanderG 1 year ago
that must be Annoying as hell dude -_-
keoshe7 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fire, Fire, Pull up, Pull up, Eject, Eject, Your Screwed, Your Screwed, Good Bye
samnoueilaty 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fire, Fire, Pull up, Pull up, Eject, Eject, Your Screwed, Your Screwed, Good Bye
samnoueilaty 1 year ago
2:10 what kind of plane is that. Concorde?
samnoueilaty 1 year ago
shut up!!!!!!!!!!!
samnoueilaty 1 year ago
FUUUULLLLLLLLLAAP lol
JamesCameron1 1 year ago
would the stabilizer motion warning come on if the tailplane wasn't working properly?
thomsonfly645k 1 year ago
haha this is funny and I am glad now I didnt become a pilot.
tahitianmoon28 1 year ago
THE MD11 Co-Pilot is fine!!!
Flyglobespan93 1 year ago
Comment removed
SavaMarkovicPilot 1 year ago 5
@SavaMarkovicPilot The McDonnell Douglas MD-11.
aerlingus231 1 year ago 16
@SavaMarkovicPilot ohh.ok..didnt know that..its nice to learn something
SavaMarkovicPilot 1 year ago
C130'S
SDYankeeNY 1 year ago
@SavaMarkovicPilot MD-11, my favorite plane
simfgta 1 year ago
@SavaMarkovicPilot
MD-11
flobber777 1 year ago
@SavaMarkovicPilot your Momma.
kefster00 1 year ago
Comment removed
samtob747 1 year ago
@SavaMarkovicPilot The Boeing 707
samtob747 1 year ago
@SavaMarkovicPilot DC-10
DetEJagDe 1 year ago
remix
silasje1 1 year ago
F-laps lol
nealshireman 1 year ago
If this is a pilot this guy needs a fucking vacation lol
spencerdev91 1 year ago 3
This is some funny shit!!!
kramerdc9 1 year ago
y dose it say stabilizer motion
pilotman088 2 years ago 2
probably to warn the pilot that the stab is coming loose
instructablesderin 2 years ago
fffffffffffffllllllllllllllllllllap, lol
jojo12455 2 years ago 3
descend descend descend NOW!!
rewindablender 2 years ago 2
This was actually funny.hahahahah! nice vid.
punckhole 2 years ago 2
The Second one was from the Eaglesoft Citation
youngpilot234 2 years ago
Sounds of the pmdg md-11 are in this video!
FlugSimulatorXfan 2 years ago
did u get some of the sound from pmdg payware planes for fs9/fsx?
flatoutfullspeed 2 years ago 7
@flatoutfullspeed No they came from different videos across the internet.
aerlingus231 2 years ago 8
@aerlingus231 whether or not you got them from different videos or not makes little difference. Those call outs from the co-pilot are from the PMDG MD-11
majordix 1 year ago
So much airlines went bankrupt...
masketkiller101 2 years ago
I was considering a career as a commercial pilot. After hearing this, I might consider another job...
Agent4tap 2 years ago
FLLLLLLLLAAAAAAPPPPP lol
BeechBaron2012 2 years ago 33
the tcas started to sound angry with the pilot after the 5th climb warning
instructablesderin 2 years ago 4