Added: 4 years ago
From: itnsource
Views: 438,527
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (721)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The lengths we go to...

  • America came in,won the war and ended the war. They defeated Germany and Japan in WW2 who's laughing now assface

  • you fucking geek wankers who gives a shit the British empire was the greatest the world has ever seen and i hate fucking americans, so why don't you fucking geeks go wank yourselves off because you are all single male paedos.

  • @eddthefuck By your screen name I can tell you are full of intellectually stimulating conversations. Dont worry we wont lose any sleep over here because of youre hate for Amercia. Go log into your American computer PC or MAC and on the American internet youtube, google, yahoo and then go watch some American tv shows.

  • @cwood4ever Tes i can tell that you are Amrican as you think the whole world revolves around you. Who the fuck would watch american tv programmes Americans have a terrible sense of humour, and most of your tv shows are absoloute shite. Yes you may own some big global brands but you have no history and no identity.

  • Actually my boy i have been in her majestys armed forces for eighteen years and have quite probably been to more combat zones than women you have fucked so don't try and tell me what it is like to lose friends. i've served in Northern ireland, Bosnia, the the congo and Iraq and Afghanistan so go fuck yourself you disrespectful yank cunt. And yes i would much rather die in combat than pissing and shitting myslf at 80 years old in a nursing home.

  • What the fuck does you being in the military have to do with it? and you americans are fucking cowards anyway turned up several years to late for both fucking wars cause "you didnt want to get involved" Cunts.

  • @eddthefuck being in the military I saw my friends die dip shit so I know how it feels. Not wanting to fight in a WAR doesn't make you a coward. WW1 was NONE OF AMERICAS BUSINESS. We should NEVER HAVE JOINED. What part of that don't you understand. WW1 started over a duke being assassinated, big deal so the leaders send their boys into the slaughter to die for what? Millions died for nothing absolutely nothing. I feel sorry for people like you who think war is glorious. Its HELL so gtfo

  • No you fucking thick yank cunts its our fucking language and its not color its colour oyu thick yank morons. Everyone knows you are all thick fat fucks. and yeah so brave waiting till several years after both wars had started before you joined. Let me guess you will mention the war of independence which was basically a civil war, brit against brit. When your country gets some history and has their own language then you can comment you fucking wankers.

  • Comment removed

  • can you thick cunt yanks not spell colour properly oor are you just all illeterate.

  • @eddthefuck

    Stupid asshat, "color" and "colour" are just dialectical differences. Americans spell it like the former, and Brits like the latter.

    Hope irony is not lost on you, because you mispelled "illiterate."

  • @eddthefuck hey fuckface we spell it" color" also can be spelled" colour" you fuckin asswipe and if it was not for america your little fuckin island would be german

  • @eddthefuck Can't you thick [Norse-Dutch-German] cunt [Latin] Yanks [American] spell colour [Latin] properly, or are you all just illiterate? That's much better, now u just sound [French] like a twat [Norse] and not an illiterate [Latin] one as well! The words in brackets r in response to your preposterous claims in other posts that UK spelling has always been the same. In fact even the world 'spell' was once 'spele' 'spellen' & colour was 'colur' [Old French] I do hope this helps.

  • @eddthefuck I think you meant to say: ‘Can you thick cunt Yanks not spell colour properly or are you just all illiterate? There, please use this, that way you only sound like prick but not an illiterate one as well!

  • cwood4ever you are as fucking thick yank cunt, show some fucking respect you fucking tosser.

  • @eddthefuck So wait a second lets brake this down, you think I am not showing respect to the dead by saying the USA should never had gotten involved? First of all dip shit I was in the military show I show only respect for men who have to die. Second of all WW1 was nothing more than politicians and kings showing their dicks in a contest to see who was the best. Millions of soldiers died for what? No reason and you get pissed when I wished the Americans stayed out of it.GTFO

  • Mehmeticili38 - not funny my family died over there

  • look at these messed up ancestors fighting over crap. its sad that hardly any german with a brain is proud of their history. and it shouldnt be that way. why are people so frikin messed up i mean the Kaiser's mother was Queen Victoria's grandaughter. This is a family war the British and German rulers were cousins.. i would have kicked both their asses its grown men killing off their people for a dick measuring contest,

  • @icepincess This video sucks. Where's the color version?

    Can you ask the uploader where to find the color version?

  • @dhbiza why do you think USA makes the world a better place. Just wanted to know.

  • sieg heil

  • @danidumnezeus sieg heil who?

  • i cannot help it, isit is a well known fact all over europe, you did your best for it.. even in present day.

  • I think this video is real cuz of the body movement of the soldiers in it and if you look closely you can tell some of them are kind of camera shy but not all wich makes it a little more probable. HATE TO SOUND LIKE WENDYS BUT YOU KNOW WHEN SHIT IS REAL!!!

  • war its a game of Ego... its always few that point fingers and say what other must do. to end a war, dont listen to the fucking retard thats thinks he is god !

  • Comment removed

  • The USA should never have gotten involved in this European dick measuring contest. What a waste of human life.

  • @cwood4ever: The U.S. got involved b/c the Kaiser was having his subs sink our ships. Why he would want to make new enemies while he was already losing is a wonder, but that was the reality. Such actions are a sign of desperation, blind frightened lashing out. We acted to bring things to a swifter more certain end. No sovereign nation can endure such unprovoked attacks & expect to be taken seriously.

  • @VictorLepanto They where sinking out ships because we where sending supplies to the Allies. However he would warn us before sinking and two we knew our ships where going to be sunk but did it anyways. We got involved in WW1 but should have stayed out of it. We also sent supplies to the central powers btw for many years during ww1. WW1 was none of Americas business we should have stayed out and let Europeans fight their own war.

  • @cwood4ever: The U.S. has no obligation to ask the Kaiser about who we will trade w/. The U.S. continued to carry on trade w/ her historic, most common trade partners, that would most certainly be Britain. We had no obligation to beggar ourselves b/c the Kaiser had blundered his nation into a war he couldn't win. More precisely, He was having his agents carry out sabotage operations in our country, & making promises to other countries to make war on us. We were unquestionably provoked.

  • @cwood4ever I agree.

  • @cwood4ever yeah its sad, but if you think right now, all these people would be dead and if they would have lived, the world would be even more overpopulated that it already is

  • @cwood4ever They joined late in the war. The main countries suffered the most losses and showed brave courage.

  • @Alfrey619 Whats your point? The USA should never have JOINED in the first place. I don't care if the USA joined the very last day. It was none of our business in the 1st place. This war wasn't worth one dead British, German or any other European soldier. What did they die for? Some Duke was assassinated. Big deal so the politician and kings send their boys into the slaughter for what? What was won in the war but widows and misery. WW2 happened because of WW1. This war was not Americans war.

  • @cwood4ever exactly, why did the US even get involved in the first place? and you seem to speak down to the europeans because of this war, i find this laughable because you're probably one of those people who wonder why so many hate americans. prime example

  • @MaGiiCxMuShRooMz The US got involved because the British showed the Americans a telegram from Germany to Mexico that was supposedly intercepted by the British where Germany asked Mexico to invade the USA. I dont talk down to Europeans what I talk down to is the European leaders who sent millions of boys to their death for a worthless war. Go fuck yourself, I dont care if Europeans hate Americans. America isnt in the business to make sure Europe is happy. USA has no need to die for Europe.

  • @cwood4ever i know, no one except the european leaders wants the usa to do die for them, they'd rather not have them anywhere near the place

  • @cwood4ever USA should never have gotten involved meddling with other peoples affairs all over the world.

  • @NGC773 I agree

  • @cwood4ever Do you actually know WHY you joined in? Well i'll tell you anyway. It's because German U-Boats were sinking American passenger and if you aren't stupid, that means killing the people who where on it. America didn't like that HENCE why they got involved.

    So in other words, why don't you find things out before you think you joined for nothing yeah?

  • @TurkeyTwizler22 The Germans where sinking British ships with American passengers on it. Germany warned Americans of the dangers and they rode at their own risk. The reason why they where sinking the ships is because for example the Lusitania we where foolishly sending supplies to England and meddling in Europeans affairs. What did you expect Germany to do, no sink ships carrying supplies to their enemy so the war could go on. No one forced the Americans on. Dont use emotion use logic it helps

  • @cwood4ever Well actually mate, America did warn the Germany that if the killed more US citizens then they would go to war with them. They chose not to listen. Hence why we started sending out our ships to protect the suppliers. That's where the very famous propaganda poster "Save the wheat, Help the fleet!" poster came from and America went to war with Germany.

  • @TurkeyTwizler22 America had no business telling Germany if they killed more US citizens that chose to get on British Ship or ship supplies to their enemy England that they would go to war. The USA should have stayed neutral and not send a single bullet, blade of wheat or a bag of flour. The US citizens that CHOSE to ride on British ships and then that ship was sunk have no room to complain. If I play with fire eventually I will be burned.

  • I'm glad we won that war. I'm from Japan.

  • @JapanHokkaidoBoy

    i'm glad you lost last war, your race is the most cruel and sadistic in history

  • @enfielddnepr Well we Axis surrendered and signed treaty at the end. But I still think we didn't 'really' lose. The casualty of USSR, China and Poland (allies) were like 50x bigger than the whole Axis' casualty. So yes we surrendered but in military power we dominated. Not really lose.

  • @enfielddnepr

    You are idiot..every race was cruel in WAR..that was allways and allways it will be..

  • @JapanHokkaidoBoy Took some German isles, big deal . . .

    

  • @Anathearon That's enough for me, lol

  • ps get fuckt frrom aust.

  • America did nothing in WW1 they join in the last year and take more than some other countries who were in it since the beginning and i cant imagine they were a hell of a lot better than many of the Americans in Vietnam playing fucking radios and shit more american troops in WW1 were court Marshalled than many other countries combined.

  • WW1 was just a big fucking waste of time! Four years, gone! The price of a mile of land was millions of young mens lives. In the aftermath, we ask ourselves 'was it worth it?' Hm, let's see, what did we accevied with this war? We put an end to four kings and emperors in Europe and... That was it. OF CAUSE IT WASN'T FUCKING WORTH IT!!!

  • all brave souls

  • how sad for the poor guys fighting . only bankers win wars.

  • Another war in which America came to the aid of those fighting for freedom. What would the world do without the US? God Bless America!!!!

  • @dhbiza Bio bi bolje mjesto za život!

  • @dhbiza It would be a better place to live!

  • @Kyrichenko Thank you! We agree the world is a better place to live thanks to the USA!!

  • @dhbiza Stop living in the past.. I bet you claim that you fight for Iraqi's freedom down in the Middle-East aswell? God blesses anyone, its not like he cares specifically about America :) lol

  • @dhbiza sorry, I didnt mean to sound rude but I mean.. America lost 2 % of all soldiers in this war. Thank god that they came to aid, but wouldnt any country do the same to its allies? Im just curious because it seems like you believe that this war, was a war fought and won by americans? And thats just ignorant!

  • @theTdawgYo Ah yes...a typical liberal.. judging a nations war contribution by the number of its dead. I actually had a lib tell me Desert Storm wasnt a war because America lost less than 200 people. WW1 butchery went on and on for 4 years w/o a settlement. The US gets involved and 1 year later it is over and the Allies are victorious. Coincidence? The contribuition was more than our 2% dead. It was our willingness to send millions of Brave Americans onto the battlefield. GOD BLESS AMERICA

  • @dhbiza now, are you judging me to be a typical liberal because I cross your personal viewpoint of history? Im not, but I see you dont like liberals, what a suprise. I dont care about operation Desert Storm. Im just saying that you take too much glory of winning a war that millions of other people from other places than america also fought in. But I guess its healthy for you to go into the past and remember a time when USA actually won wars, since then it hasn't been so glorious. God blezz!

  • @theTdawgYo I see you are from Norway. Now it makes sense why you dont want to give America any credit. Your country owes a debt to us for saving your butt in WW2 and you feel guilty about it. Dont worry. We were glad to do it and we will defend your country again, no questions asked. Ask your parents and grandparents...they probably have a different view of America after living thru the horror of what a REAL demonic country (Nazi Germany) did to Norway.

  • @dhbiza Jesus.. I never said I didnt want to give america credit, infact I gave them credit in my first comment. America saved millions by joining in and ending the war, but you are giving america ALL the credit. That's whats wrong. Yes Im norwegian, yes I am glad america joined the allies in WW2 to end hitler's reich. I dont have a bad viewpoint off America, I just disagree with what you are saying! And no, I dont feel guilty at all. Russia saved us just as much as america did.

  • @dhbiza and btw I think its weak that you change the subject to Norway owing debt and that I should feel guilty about that, when I was born just 2 decades ago.. And yeah, I guess you can ask your parents and grandparents too, since you never (50 years) lived during the WW2 either. Yet you speak like YOU just won it. I mean, beeing patriotic is all good, but you should try to see the whole picture aswell. By the way, do you know anything of what Nazi Germany did to norway?

  • @dhbiza

    "WW1 butchery went on and on for 4 years w/o a settlement. The US gets involved and 1 year later it is over and the Allies are victorious. Coincidence?" Because French , Britishs and Russians ( during 3 years ) destroyed german armies during 4 years . If the war ended it is because the Suprem commander ( MArechal Foch ) wanted it . Because he didn't want to sign the armistice and was ready to invaded Germany . But USA was to afraid to follow him lol .

  • Why is it that almost every time i here ww1 i think of countless llifes lost for little pieces of land and soilders with mustaches

  • @narutoboy15 because you are making a prejudgement (prejudiced) generalization of a world & time you do not understand & when you do try you fail, trying to look at a past era with a modern mentality can only result in utter failure. enjoy

  • I cant say why but I find the first world war so damn cute :3

    I think it's because of the mess and destruction caused by the relatively ``primitive`` weapons.

    it's the same thing as a baby that makes a total mess in a room , then you open the door and see the room totally F*cked, then you look at the baby and say: ohhh you XD and then you hug it cuz that was super cute. that's the feeling that I have regarding the WWI. =)

  • @MistaPimpa

    Cute is certainly not the word I would use.

    Brutal, barbaric, utterly tragic, destructive, miserable, horrible and cruel are words slightly closer to the mark (But even then they don't really cut it)

    But cute?!

  • This war fucked up Europe

  • We will never forget. I am just seventeen, but after have learnt about World War I in Modern History I can honestly say that I wouldn't have survived a day. R.I.P. To all Veterens.

  • Is the sound recorded from gta IV? very poor!!

  • @partdeadtoenail well what the fuck did you expect it's nearly 100 years old!

  • Youtube 1911 lol

  • humans.

  • in 0:49 are they going into No Mans land?

  • I bet there were no compensation claims for deafness caused by lack of ear protetion back them, or were there?

  • ......the future of our modern society looks bad and I`m glad that I won`t be there to see it.

  • This gang culture has spread so fast its scarey. As time goes by the memory and the respect for those of WW1 and WW2 will be forgotten because these people who are high on drugs and in gangs are our future. Gang culture and gun culture is all over the world and it can only get worse. Those souls who fought in the two wars lost their lives for nothing because what did they fight for - so people can be in gangs and commit crime and murder and intimidate people........

  • Does anybody care about WW1 or WW11? , does anybody care that people died in these wars? does anybody care that these soldiers fought and died for our future. In our modern society drugs are a big problem, crime is a big problem and murder is a big problem. Its got that way now that people are scared to go outside at night because people are high on drugs and in gangs and lurking about with guns in their pockets. They haven`t got jobs and claim unemployment benefit of the state.

  • @helicopter618 Actually you're talking about liberalism. Also I don't know what you're talking about but everybody loves the hell outta of WW2, WW1 and other wars beside that are being overshadowed by WW2.

  • @UnrealSlayer92 I`m actually talking about the modern generation. Look at whats happening in the world today - drug taking, crime, murder, rape.The human race does not respect itself like it did in the time of WW1 and WW11. What did the souls of WW1 and WW11 fight for? so future generations could can be high on drugs, commit crime, commit murder and commit rape. The fighting in those two wars was for nothing because the future has turned evil

  • @helicopter618 Yeah, it's called human nature. People would do that shit even before the World Wars.

  • @UnrealSlayer92 no they wouldn`t. During WW1 and WW11 people were called up at the age of 18 to join the army, airforce or merchant navy if they refused they had to face the consequences - JAIL. There were no gangs they could join, there was no drug taking, there was no crime and there was no murders. Once people reached the age of 18 they were called up to join. The youths of today who are in gangs taking drugs and committing crime wouldn`t last five minutes if the had to experience WW1/WW11

  • @helicopter618 you're right, thank you!

  • Not to disrespect the soldiers during WW2, but WW1 was living hell. 19th century soldiers fighting in a 20th century industrial war. Trench warfare was horrible. Also no disrespect to the Americans, but I think the reason their leaders were so keen to urge fighting in the cold war was because they were involved fuck all with the bloodiest human sacrifice in history, WW1.

  • @ToaJoe those were real soldiers fighting in real battles for a reason and now theres this stupid iraq war id like to see the troops from today be put back in this war

  • @crackerHero No, that's not fair. There are thousands of 20 year olds who die in Iraq. The actual war is a mistake- don't insult the soldiers who fight in it, though. It is not their decision.

  • There were many reasons WWI started but the straw that broke the camels back was the assasination of duke franz ferdinand of austria. But the war shouldnt of happened due to ansluche.

  • I think it was in 1914 when I met a French soldier. He appeared a reservist because he and his detachment were wearing a mix of civillian clothing and military clothing. They were all lining up in a field and seemed unaware of the danger this posed. He asked me if a lot of people were to die. He was afraid. I told him I was pretty sure everyone was going to die.

  • TRUE HEROES watch?v=5eODLtDz4IM&feature=re­lated

  • Slaughter on an industrial scale. And for what, for the sake of nationalism, economics and ideology?

    What an absolute waste of resources and human lives.

  • @lurconis666

    Actualy all started with murder of one man. Then two micro countries went to war and russians joined one side as they are allies, then germans joined other (they were also allied) and then basicaly everyone looked at their contracts etc. and all fun started.

  • @D3adtrap: Yes, but the murder started the war because of nationalism.

  • @lurconis666 You believe in evolution and natural selection? Because you're looking at it.

  • Ottoman Empire yeeeehhhh!!!

  • Ottoman Empire yeeeehhh !!

  • My Father fought in this war, he always called a trench war. Father said the Mustard Gas was bad. He was with the US Army Air Force.

  • BOYS AS YOUNG AS 14 JOINED TO FIGHT IN WW1 To most war was seen as game that was an adventure and it would soon be over and they would win and have good times they didnt have a clue they watched there friends getting slaughtered wave after wave knowing they were the next wave to die R.I.P These brave

  • victory of turks with ataturk

  • one of the stupids wars ever seem in history!

  • my grandad was on the western front not sure where but i remeber him riddled with shrapnel and his lungs fucked from the mustard gas how he live through it i dont know how watching this

  • harry patch, our last survivor from the 1st world war died earlier this year, it was on the news and the daily papers. if i'm wrong, then i stand corrected and thanks for the update.

  • @rex90986 Polen was not involved in the first war

  • @ozeangruen Poland was not a nation it was split up between the German Russian and Austrian Empires they all ganged up on Poland in the 18th century when Poland-lithuanian comanwelth was a major empire.

    So Poland where not involved yes but the Polish where very much involved while some fought for the powers Poland fought for Germany because on wars end they promesed that Poland whould be independent and they did defeat Russia with the Treaty of Brest-lestrovik.

  • @thebritish25 thanks mate

  • This great footage is like in my WW1 one soldiers dinary...

  • what a terrible waste of life

  • 0:19 Dam i want that gun

  • wow

    

  • FUCK YOU AMERICANS because you came the ww2 broke out

  • @luki5133 That has to be the most ignorant comment ever posted on YouTube. I would say that the root cause for WWII was The Treaty of Versailles, which was registered by the League of Nations, which the U.S. was never a member of. Besides, the U.S. never wanted to enter the war, but Germany was messing up U.S. trade.

    I can’t decide if you are joking or not. Are you serious?

  • @BigJonBone no i mean..the first worldwar...we had a war with france england and russia (serbia etc) but you only killed austrians and germans since you wanted your money back from the entente empires...if we had won this worldwar ...we would not have the 2 world war(my english is not so good)

  • @luki5133 Even it was the U.S. beating Germany that caused The Treaty of Versailles to be registered (which caused WWII). Germany is the reason the U.S. got involved in WWI anyway. So since Germany started trouble with the U.S., it their own fault that they lost WWI, and their own fault for the registering of The Treaty of Versailles.

    Your english is okay. It's better than my German so I wont complain.

  • @BigJonBone you mean the "u -boot" attack from the germans ...they wanted to destroy a few english trade ships but destroyed americans^^

  • @luki5133 lol If if's and but's were candy and nuts... well you did not win the war and so you came back for more and got stomped out yet again. Lucky people were merciful on germany and did not try you all as nazi's. Im sure the jew bankers would of wanted it to happen... but the rest of the world spared you so be thankful the world did not release the wrath of the jew on your people.

  • WWI for me the dirtiest battle ever

  • @KingFreshmilk for info - WW1 wasn't a battle it was a war. The war consisted of many battles.

  • @TheThorny1979 yes but it the war was really dirty

  • @TheThorny1979 - No it wasn't. WW1 was a single battle. The belligerents were South Carolina, the Dutch East Indies and Guatemala.

  • @TheThorny1979 thus ww1 means world war 1 lmao

  • @TheThorny1979 it was one big massacre.

  • @KingFreshmilk for peets sake ww1 IS A WAR !!! not a BATTLE DICK !!

  • @olililyall

    haha lol i know i dont know why i wrote battle

  • @KingFreshmilk

    Wallowing in trenches all the time and dying of disease, yum.

  • I would want to die in war above anything else.

    "I would rather wear out, then rust out" - some European preacher who I forgot the name to.

  • So as you can see, they can't feel, they can't fear, they can't be depressed, they can only fit in their emotions to kill and have some fun doing it.

  • The Ottoman Empire kidnapped European children, forcefully converted them to Islam, train them to kill, and then made them fight their fellow Europeans as janissaries. Some Chinese babies are taken by the government and converted into soldiers. Japanese pilots were taught gravity and descent so that if they ran out of ammunition, or if they were kamakazes or "cherry blossoms" (man flown missles) to properly ram their plane into a US ship. Soldiers are supposed to be trained to ignore that stuff.

  • Warfare back then was the best, classic, 'storm the bunker, lads', true form of war! Instead of today's war, boring and high-tech, it takes all of the fun out of it!

  • @0TheNewFascistParty War is never fun.It is completly immoral.HIgh tech weapons leads to less loss of lives

  • @007dalal Now say that exact sentence with ICBM's in mind.

  • @0TheNewFascistParty0 yeah, walking out in the open towards a machine gun which was about to rip you to shreds, they must have had the time of their lives!

  • @Futureboy2026 War helps strengthen a State's economy, it takes out the bad guys, and it shows the true strength of a nation.

    If I was in the battle and both of my parents were dead (Which in age ratio they probably would), I think I would have some fun with it.

    Don't be a socialist about this, back then, it was true warrior vs. warrior combat, now it's 'take out the enemy five miles away with a sniper.' It's not right.

  • @0TheNewFascistParty0 This type of combat in the trenches was 'true warrior versus warrior' ,get real, of course its easy to say that on youtube in the comfort of your home hiding behind a computer, talking shit you're whole life.

  • @gixer121121 Now I agree that the biochemical warfare back then was not fare. But we need war in this world, "We wage war, so that we may keep peace." That was warfare 80-90 years ago and that was the modern way of fighting, now it's high tech drones and 5 mile snipers, there technology was simply up to date to, 'fire a couple rounds, attach bayonet and charge. The oldest skeleton ever found had a spear in it's chest, it's just the time of war. I'm hoping of joining hte National Gaurd or the

  • @gixer121121 Army soon. (Not the Navy, I'm claustrophobic or the Air Force, I'm afraid of heights)

  • @0TheNewFascistParty0

    Imagine a 19 yr old French kid caught in the barbed wire in no mans land with a piece of shrapnell in his guts, crying for his mother for 9 hrs in a row, before finally dying.

    (As my late grandfather who actually WAS there told me)

    And have 'fun'.

    Blodes Schwein!

  • @helmuthoorn War isn't supposed to be fun but banks aren't supposed to get robber either and they are. Like I said, they had cruel tools of war back then and they were conditioned to ignore fear (I can accept the possibility of pain though) but fear was supposed to be obsolete as the wind in the air. My unbiological grandfather was a radioman in a B-17 Bomber in WWII, "flying coffins" as they said, were being shot down all around him, men on fire had to jump out of planes without parachutes...

  • @helmuthoorn ...as they fell thousands of feet to the ground wondering if they made enough right choices to get into heaven as their skin is burned off, and my grandfather didn't say anything bad about the war, in fact, he probably said he had a little fun in it. War isn't always fun when blood is pouring out of the hole in your stomach, thats for certain and that's what your posting, but in other times, it can be adventurous and adrenaline filled.

  • @helmuthoorn Only when you're hurting do you feel discouraged. Now some people might say war isn't fun and I can agree to that at some points but we need to glorify war and necessitate it for our nation to be stronger. We don't always start wars but rather we are dragged into them and we are forced to be the shiny armored knight riding in on a white horse to save our allies. And if you don't have fun being the good guy, there might be something wrong with you.

  • @0TheNewFascistParty0

    If there is something to be gloryfied it must be the courage, honour and sense of duty of the men fighting, but NEVER war itself. Tend to agree with you on a lot of other things (not a pacifist!), but your choice of words and the way you state your argument can lead to misunderstandings.

    Anyway; my apologies for calling you a stupid pig in German.

  • @helmuthoorn There would be no courage, bravery, and strength in football players if there was no football to begin with.

  • @0TheNewFascistParty0

    You cannot compare a football match with a war.

    Most of these players are only in it for the money, the prestige and the girls and being able to handle a ball well with your feet and legs hasn't got much to do with courage and nothing with honour.

    Or would you call pussy diver Ronaldo a brave man?

    Or coke sniffer Maradona honourable?

    Or any big time professional selling off his ass to the highest biddder loyal?

  • @helmuthoorn I'm just making a point that there can't be bravery in a soldier without the much needed help of war.

  • @0TheNewFascistParty0 War's only "fun" when you're playing it on a video game or watching a movie. Go get shot at and bombarded with bombs for 6 months on end, sleep deprived and twitching at anything with constant sounds of explosions and gun fire and then tell us how "fun" it is.

  • @fullmetalfunk Well, think of it like this, war is now played as a video games today, the unpiloted drones for example, are controlled by soldiers over in Germany from computers. No fighting whatsoever nowadays. And war isn't always supposed to be fun but it is a necessity for a State to survive. PLUS, soldiers are constantly trained to be emotionally dull, want to know why drill seargents scream at their soldiers? To condition them to just be emotionally, dull killing machines.

  • @0TheNewFascistParty0 Well I'll agree that they are supposed to be able to ahndle those situations, no matter how much you train a man you can't not make him afraid of what's going on, you can't make him numb to the realities and horros of awr, especially face to face, room to room style combat. What you can do is teach them how to deal with that and how to stay some what calm in thos esituations so they do their job. That by no means makes them unafraid or numb to what is happening.

  • @fullmetalfunk Now that can be true that they can't be completely oblivious to fear with our Amerikan way of training, but the Russians are able to make their Spetznaz comando's scare Death himself. If we trained our troops just a little bit more, more fear for war would be eradicated except for the occasions of injury.

  • @0TheNewFascistParty0 I HIGHLY doubt that Spetznaz commandos still aren't afraid. Being afraid isn't an issue, it's being able to fight through it which most any soldiers do pretty damn well. The way America trains it's troops is top of the line...how do you explain how we are the military powerhouse we are? There's a big difference between training a man and turning him into somehting that isn't man anymore. I wouldn't want them defending me or fighting for my country that's for sure.

  • @fullmetalfunk No, no, no, the Spetznaz ARE fearless! We are not the only military powerhouse either, their's Russia, China, and us.

  • @0TheNewFascistParty0 China is only a powerhouse because of their numbers, not their training. Russia is buig and formidable but not as put together as they once were, full of corruption and what not. You want an army to look out for that rivals ours? Isreal and Germany.

  • @fullmetalfunk A superpower doesn't always have to be the one's with the largest armies. China does have a great economy because of their numbers, this can be a weapon also, and suck the planet dry of it's currency. They could easily convert 1 billion of those into troops within a year. Russia holds the worlds more powerful and largest atomic bomb to make up for their lack of missle defense systems like we have. We have our own ways of being a superpower too, and it was known after we joined

  • @fullmetalfunk WWII. Germany does have a formidable army but it's populace is very liberal, enviromentally friendly, and peace loving and don't wouldn't want to go to war (this is how we lost Korea) so their army is basically useless. Israel I can believe because of their power and strength to withsatand attacks from countless enemies and because of their ultimate religious power. But all in all, there are alot of different ways a country can be a superpower.

  • @fullmetalfunk Soldiers are sent to battle as empty as a hollow log. If a soldier IS firghtened, it is the military's fault for now conditioning them enough. Some country's strip their cadets of their clothes, blind fold them, tie them to a post and start shooting bullets 2 inches away from their face to train them, the Spetznaz' way of training is globally agreed as techinically inhumane. Communist Afrikan armies kidnap children and condition them as cold-blooded children soldiers.

  • War is stupid and achieves nothing.

  • @STHFGDBY We all know that lol here's the appropriate quote for you :) "Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something." :P

  • @AK47HEAVYMETAL83 Ya thats something the world perceives about Americans, so your dead right there.

  • @STHFGDBY They perceive us that way because that is the way America was found, instigating war, we fought Indians, took their land, and then fought the British, gained our Independence, then we fought the Mexicans to gain more land, and here we are, today, still fighting, not for freedom, but to show off to the world that we're the shit, and that we're the world police. The only time we actually fought for freedom was the Revolutionary War. Our country is not humble, we're pretty egotistical.

  • @AK47HEAVYMETAL83 It is not that your nation is egotistical about their military exploits but that they are dishonest that the world view the United States with suspicion. If the US put its hand up and said, " Yep, you pegged it, we are an Empire...deal with it." The rest of the world would be alot cooler with the US.

    I for one think you should officially come out and say the US is an Empire, of sorts.

    Personally I rather the US empire flexing rather than China, Iran, Russia.

  • @fp470 "I for one think you should officially come out and say the US is an Empire, of sorts."--I agree. We've used hard power lately with the Iraqi invasion in 2003. Bt most of the time, American Imperialism is spreading slowly through soft power (cultural influence), and playing the "Daddy" role whenever there's a disaster...making the world see our humanitarian efforts, it would make them partner with us...but then we're the superior one, so we'd be in control in establishing policy.

  • On the day of resurrection there will be trenches full of ... discussions.

    No Sir .. this ear is french .. and give the american his knees back .. that hand ? .. thats german ... by the way, these guts seem to be british ... but where the hell is the rest of you ?