Sorry, David but this is an apples and oranges comparison. Aikman walked into an absolutely dismal team in Dallas. It took three seasons for the Cowboys to win just 14 games while Aikman was running for his life. Even with that and the injuries that caught up with Aikman in his final few seasons, he still has a higher completion percentage than McNabb who has had most of his completions with screens and short to medium routes whereas Aikman's were more down the field. Less risk = fewer picks
david, stick to playing football because you are clueless on analysis.
bull864 1 year ago
Sorry, David but this is an apples and oranges comparison. Aikman walked into an absolutely dismal team in Dallas. It took three seasons for the Cowboys to win just 14 games while Aikman was running for his life. Even with that and the injuries that caught up with Aikman in his final few seasons, he still has a higher completion percentage than McNabb who has had most of his completions with screens and short to medium routes whereas Aikman's were more down the field. Less risk = fewer picks
jocwalk 1 year ago