The later constitution was written by the founders. The former constitution with "of" in it was written by a bunch of backstabbing greedy lawyers in 1871. It's the slave constitution - take an oath to that and you've rebelled against the republic (where the FED is subservient to the states).
Badnarik is for Constitutional Govermnent in the form of what the founders wanted, and nothing else. He probably doesn't answer your question because he doesn't know what the hell you're talking about.
Don't try to antagonize the guy.. I believe he is sincere and not out to deceive anyone. But we can agree to disagree.
I'll stop removing your comments if you clarify what the hell you're talking about because you're not making any sense.
Like for one, say what the hell the difference between the two are. Yes I see a difference in capitalization and a word. So what the hell is the point your trying to get at? Is the other one some sort of crazy document that's not what we expect?
Clarify or gtfo with your bullshit. If you can't clarify, I'm not censoring you, I'm telling you to fuck off.
The later constitution was written by the founders. The former constitution with "of" in it was written by a bunch of backstabbing greedy lawyers in 1871. It's the slave constitution - take an oath to that and you've rebelled against the republic (where the FED is subservient to the states).
antibrainwash 1 year ago
Are you talking about the Act of 1871?
Badnarik is for Constitutional Govermnent in the form of what the founders wanted, and nothing else. He probably doesn't answer your question because he doesn't know what the hell you're talking about.
Don't try to antagonize the guy.. I believe he is sincere and not out to deceive anyone. But we can agree to disagree.
RileyE104 1 year ago
JUST ASK HIM!
antibrainwash 1 year ago
I'll stop removing your comments if you clarify what the hell you're talking about because you're not making any sense.
Like for one, say what the hell the difference between the two are. Yes I see a difference in capitalization and a word. So what the hell is the point your trying to get at? Is the other one some sort of crazy document that's not what we expect?
Clarify or gtfo with your bullshit. If you can't clarify, I'm not censoring you, I'm telling you to fuck off.
RileyE104 1 year ago
Censored here too - you must be a shill as well... I simply ask you to ASK HIM TO QUOTE THE CONSTITUTION HE SUPPORTS....
"Constitution of the United States of America"
"Constitution for the united states of America"
Note CASE and the difference in the word "of" and "for" NOTICE how he NEVER quotes what constitution he's TALKING ABOUT!
antibrainwash 1 year ago
Ron Paul/Michael Badnarik 2012
cope21995 2 years ago
That was supposed to be a THUMBS UP oops...
cherilynmonroe 2 years ago
He should have every seat filled and all the standing room in the back too. I will be first in line next time he's lecturing in my area.
wewd 2 years ago
Excellent professor and teacher.
benji3001 2 years ago
The more videos I see of Michael Badnarik the more I like. Thanks.
nanotech2020 2 years ago 2