Why does every religious douchebag have to start a debate in video's related to pure science? The Inquisition is over guys, just get a grip on reality.
@Nerdykid95 basically, it may be a next day they make a discovery (its the nature of sience). engineers still need some time to build crafts and so on.
@Nerdykid95 But we did not break any laws. It is just discovering and describing them. The laws of physics are not breakable. If they seem so, then it means they are not yet described in enough detail.
That, and science is designed to work with, not against religion, yes some things conflict, but that is mostly because of human error (and assumption).
Science is the pursuit of truth about how the universe works (things not yet explained). Religion does not attempt to find truth, it fills in the blanks with ignorance and bigotry rooted in superstition.
@ecollazo67 How do you know that science has not provided the means to promote lies that replace religious truths, and to encourage people to be unaware of the depths of knowledge the religions have maintained secret depths for ages? The predujice of those who dismiss religion provide a means for their own manipulations by ignorance. It is not scientific to dismiss superstitions. A person who does so fails in observation efforts!
@Lamineth yes no maybe so... science can't explain everything though because there are unlimited things to discover in the universe meaning we will never have completed intelligence... and whatever science can't explain usually gets thrown out the window. Science isn't always explainable in some things nor is any religoun- i'd say both can be unable to explain completely
Did anyone tell [materialclassified] that in Latin, word order doesn't matter, and there is no such thing as punctuation or spaces.... So, unless you know how to conjugate and decline, let alone think you are good enough to translate and interpret, I don't think you should be trying to place religion into science.
@Lamineth Two issues - if you're referring to the comments I think you're referring to, than actually- that's not Latin. It looks like it might be Hebrew, maybe, but definitely not Latin.
Also, Latin does have a few constructs and patterns that depend on word order, such as prepositional phrases, and does include spaces and punctuation (though most writing that survived to this day was carved painstakingly into stone, and understandably lax in punctuation usage, like an ancient twitter feed).
Genesis 1:1 says: "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth" Right? It does not say HOW he did it, only that he did. That leaves the Big Bang as an open possibility even if you believe the bible. How can you say that God did not cause the Big Bang in order to create the heavens and the earth?
With each new discovery, the position of science is changing from being in conflict with Yahwehs 3,200-year-old testimony to being in harmony with it. Old science has been refuted, not Yahuweh. For example, as recently as fifty years ago, prior to the discovery of the red shift in light, the overwhelming preponderance of scientists believed the universe was a constant, that it had always existed, and that it therefore wasnt created.
After mans follies with Yahwehs Word, it's a shame when we take it back to Yahwehs language hebrew, we find the words in the Genesis account which by the way, there was only one eyewitness, so we will just have to take Him for His word. While Yahuwehs creation account isnt merely a scientific explanation, it has proven scientific implications that humankind couldnt appreciate before Einsteins Theories of Special and General Relativity.
They demonstrate that before matter was created through the transformation of energy into mass, there was no time or space. Time began when matter and space were formed. That is precisely what the word 'reshith' from hebrew Genesis is telling us because reshith is defined as: the initiation of the process of the state of being, the first point in space-time. Consistent with Einsteins Theory, where light is the universal constant, light was the first thing God made manifest.
and in the next word from hebrew we have the word 'hayah.' And what a word it is. Like Yahuweh Himself, light exists outside, or beyond, the constraints of time. According to Relativity, at the velocity of light, the past, present, and future exist simultaneously. That is why the verb, hayah, I was, I am, and I will be, We were, We are, and We will be, lies at the heart of Yahwehs name.
Yahweh our God exists beyond the confines of the four dimensions of time and space we understand. He sees yesterday, today, and tomorrow, here and there, as if they were all here and now. However, to relate to us and to enter our more finite realm, Yahweh can and does convert some of His light energy into matter. As a matter of fact, modern science has come to recognize that all matter is just a mass of stable light.
A Son was given!.. the Messi/yah Yahushua, a diminished form of Yahweh.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
God existing in the confines of our dimensions and time.
Light, like Yahuweh, is not only the universal constant; it is the purest form of energy. And energy is the source and substance of matter. At creation, when energy became matter through Einsteins E=mc2, the four-dimensional construct we call spacetime, began.
Scientists are completely baffled when it comes to explaining the nature of the strongest macro influence on the universe—gravity—the tendency of energy/matter to attract.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
And even if we were to stumble on gravitys nature or cause, we would then only understand ten percent of the forces influencing our observable reality. Ninety percent of the energy/matter at work in the universe is black, or invisible to our observations. This completely unknown effect provides a counter-force to gravity, demonstrating a repulsive nature.String Theory suggests this could be the result of several more dimensions, albeit within a point and thus acting at the micro-atomic level.
The Word and The Way third word is bara. It means to create in the sense of initiating something new which had not been in existence before. The term is used prolifically by Isaiah in the context of his Messianic prophecies, especially as he predicts the advent of the Renewed Covenant. Consistent with this regenerative and redemptive concept,bara means: creator, choice, transformation, dispatch, birth, perfection, perform a task, be cut down, and renewal, bringing back to a prior state.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Bringing it all together, the first seven words reveal: In (ba - near, with, and in proximity to, regarding the account of) the beginning (reshith - at the start of time and the initiation of the process of existence, concerning the first fruits, the head of the family), God (elohym - the Mighty Ones) accordingly (et - accompanying and in association) created (bara - performed a miracle, choosing perfect transformation and renewed birth, conceiving, planning, ...cont.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
preparing, and producing) the (ha) universe, the spiritual world (samayim - the heavens, and the abode of stars) and (wa) also (et) the (ha) material realm (erets - matter, the physical and natural world). (Genesis 1:1)
Now that is a little better take on Genesis before man changed the "WORD."
King and Cleric are guilty of keeping the world from knowing their true Creator.
Flee religion!!! It is why your Savior was put to death. He was removing the politics in religion. peace.
antimatter is simply matter made up of antiparticles which are simply particles with the opposite charge or spin of normally seen particles.
antimatter and matter have almost the exact same properties, create almost the exact same elements (like anti-hydrogen), but destroy each other when they collide leaving behind photons.
no I really don't understand. Satan has nothing to do with antimatter. that's not even biblical. there isn't even the slightest suggestion in the bible that Satan will use antimatter or antiparticles in any way shape or form. your just making stuff up because you have a misunderstanding of some sort.
Regarding elements, several unusual elements are created in laboratories and we have no reason to believe that some of them develop naturally. Furthermore, there are elements here on Earth that are only created in a supernova.
Lastly, on a completely unrelated note, I doubt that the videos you have posted on your "channel" are yours. The fact that they have their channel information stamped on the feed is pretty good "evidence" that you stole it.
Actually, there is a fair amount of proof to back up the claims postulated regarding Big Bang theories. Substantiated proof is requisite in having a theory; even some degree of sound and observed logic is needed for just a hypothesis.
You might want to work on your grammar though; there are a couple of sentences that do not make much sense.
the string theory is a stretch, don't hold your breath as many scientists would say. However, if you want the contemporary and more widely accepted version, I recommend searching and learning about E8 theory. It's got the details down, and it's based on charges and anti-charges that have and haven't been found. It's intuitive and science is consistently completing its empty table day by day. The higgs boson belongs to this table (its 8-dimensional)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
No one can say the truth that 13 Biilion years ago existed and a Big Bang. There is no proof. You must understand we don't have the element that existed trillions of years. We only have the elements here in our earth, but not the elements from outside. Now stop dreaming and come to reality. If you go until the end of the wall universe, then you will see tons of elements that we don't have it here in our planets.
OK, this is all very interesting, but they've been at this for awhile now. SHouldn't they be smashing Quarks and Gluons together by now to find out what's inside those little buggers. Maybe strings?? And many years before we start smashing "strings" ???
Quarks cannot exist in nature as single particles, they always occur in triplets. Gluons are virtual particles that carry the strong nuclear force, which holds quarks together with other quark triplets to form atomic nuclei. Plus, there are 6 types of quarks that vary by charge, magnitude of charge, and spin (plus others I'm sure I'm forgetting).
They choose gold, not carbon for a number of reasons. First of all, carbon is a relatively light element, #14, where as gold is a heavier ion at #79. The heavier ion has a higher number of particles per ion which means more collisions and a better result.
There are other reasons, such as ion stability blah blah blah. Also, a specific isotope of gold was likely selected for specific properties.
Also, price doesn't matter when your dealing with a small number of particles.
If they are trying to replicate somewhat just moments after the big bang, shouldnt they have used a building block like carbon seeing that everything has carbon in it?
@P3tr4W45H3r3 the choice if ions is determined what the current ion source can deliver as the heaviest nuclei, at CERN they use Pb. Next year RHIC will have a new source that can produce even heavier ions. RHIC also used deuterium and copper so far.
what do 'building blocks' have to do with it ? at these temperatures and pressures its about the quarks and gluons inside the nucleus and we need lots of them, therefor we use a heavy element. We also compared the gold with copper, deuterium and proton collisions to see the difference.
tell me what the purpose of this RHIC experiment again. in the very beginning it was announced that its purpose was to essentially create a big bang again and look at the results. If were not going by common "theory" we may as well be using an orange.
Carbon is an important element in biology, but that doesn't matter for this. Is that the reason you would suggest it? Also, it isn't as common as Hydrogen, Helium, Oxygen, and a few others.
i am guessing it is something like what happens at CERN, they either collected it and stored it or(and i think this is more probable) it only exists for a certain period of time before it turns back into the original ions
@Maheekun the quarks and gluons recombine to elementary particles which are then measured in the detectors. These remnants are all the experiments can see the quark-soup exists for only 10^-24 sec, that's a trillionth of a trillionth of a second.
love this vid
xtremetom180 1 month ago
damn thats cool
SuperDogbrown 1 month ago
Religion is stupid, Period.
thepielord26 8 months ago 2
to bad youtube can't come up with a 'content' filter to block out haters
Infamanious 1 year ago
Soup...Is there enaugh salt?? Yummy!
avelione 1 year ago
Why does every religious douchebag have to start a debate in video's related to pure science? The Inquisition is over guys, just get a grip on reality.
UnReALVeNoM 1 year ago 7
If you like this topic, see also watch?v=jF8QO3Cou-Q
skinnym974 1 year ago
Well, now that we broke the laws of physics, how much longer until Star Trek becomes a historical fiction?
Nerdykid95 1 year ago
@Nerdykid95 basically, it may be a next day they make a discovery (its the nature of sience). engineers still need some time to build crafts and so on.
at least that`s my opinion
BAC9I 1 year ago
@Nerdykid95 But we did not break any laws. It is just discovering and describing them. The laws of physics are not breakable. If they seem so, then it means they are not yet described in enough detail.
dakiro222 1 year ago
Is it a stupid question to ask if the temperature is in farenheight, celsius or kelvin?
fasantupp 1 year ago
celcius :P
demo360 1 year ago
@fasantupp it is a good question in my opinion.
dakiro222 1 year ago
That, and science is designed to work with, not against religion, yes some things conflict, but that is mostly because of human error (and assumption).
ok, bottom line,
Science= Explainable (Fact) Religion= Unexplainable (Faith)
Lamineth 2 years ago 2
I'm sorry but that's just ridiculous.
Science is the pursuit of truth about how the universe works (things not yet explained). Religion does not attempt to find truth, it fills in the blanks with ignorance and bigotry rooted in superstition.
ecollazo67 2 years ago 32
@ecollazo67 How do you know that science has not provided the means to promote lies that replace religious truths, and to encourage people to be unaware of the depths of knowledge the religions have maintained secret depths for ages? The predujice of those who dismiss religion provide a means for their own manipulations by ignorance. It is not scientific to dismiss superstitions. A person who does so fails in observation efforts!
Nueroactive 11 months ago
@ecollazo67 i dont know what religion youre talking about but theres many, and mine does involve science so religion does bring truth n whatsoever
921milanista 10 months ago
@Lamineth Wow, you sound like on giant contradiction.
jingling30 2 years ago
@Lamineth yes no maybe so... science can't explain everything though because there are unlimited things to discover in the universe meaning we will never have completed intelligence... and whatever science can't explain usually gets thrown out the window. Science isn't always explainable in some things nor is any religoun- i'd say both can be unable to explain completely
chsspartan 1 year ago
Did anyone tell [materialclassified] that in Latin, word order doesn't matter, and there is no such thing as punctuation or spaces.... So, unless you know how to conjugate and decline, let alone think you are good enough to translate and interpret, I don't think you should be trying to place religion into science.
Lamineth 2 years ago
@Lamineth Two issues - if you're referring to the comments I think you're referring to, than actually- that's not Latin. It looks like it might be Hebrew, maybe, but definitely not Latin.
Also, Latin does have a few constructs and patterns that depend on word order, such as prepositional phrases, and does include spaces and punctuation (though most writing that survived to this day was carved painstakingly into stone, and understandably lax in punctuation usage, like an ancient twitter feed).
CarbonatedCube 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'll tell you what happened, the "Big Bang never happened. the earth was created by God almighty (Genesis 1:1)
Mitz715 2 years ago
Genesis 1:1 says: "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth" Right? It does not say HOW he did it, only that he did. That leaves the Big Bang as an open possibility even if you believe the bible. How can you say that God did not cause the Big Bang in order to create the heavens and the earth?
DragonLance156156 2 years ago
With each new discovery, the position of science is changing from being in conflict with Yahwehs 3,200-year-old testimony to being in harmony with it. Old science has been refuted, not Yahuweh. For example, as recently as fifty years ago, prior to the discovery of the red shift in light, the overwhelming preponderance of scientists believed the universe was a constant, that it had always existed, and that it therefore wasnt created.
materialclassified 2 years ago
After mans follies with Yahwehs Word, it's a shame when we take it back to Yahwehs language hebrew, we find the words in the Genesis account which by the way, there was only one eyewitness, so we will just have to take Him for His word. While Yahuwehs creation account isnt merely a scientific explanation, it has proven scientific implications that humankind couldnt appreciate before Einsteins Theories of Special and General Relativity.
materialclassified 2 years ago
They demonstrate that before matter was created through the transformation of energy into mass, there was no time or space. Time began when matter and space were formed. That is precisely what the word 'reshith' from hebrew Genesis is telling us because reshith is defined as: the initiation of the process of the state of being, the first point in space-time. Consistent with Einsteins Theory, where light is the universal constant, light was the first thing God made manifest.
materialclassified 2 years ago
and in the next word from hebrew we have the word 'hayah.' And what a word it is. Like Yahuweh Himself, light exists outside, or beyond, the constraints of time. According to Relativity, at the velocity of light, the past, present, and future exist simultaneously. That is why the verb, hayah, I was, I am, and I will be, We were, We are, and We will be, lies at the heart of Yahwehs name.
I will send a Son in my name, Messi/YAH,
"The Implement of YAH"
materialclassified 2 years ago
Yahweh our God exists beyond the confines of the four dimensions of time and space we understand. He sees yesterday, today, and tomorrow, here and there, as if they were all here and now. However, to relate to us and to enter our more finite realm, Yahweh can and does convert some of His light energy into matter. As a matter of fact, modern science has come to recognize that all matter is just a mass of stable light.
A Son was given!.. the Messi/yah Yahushua, a diminished form of Yahweh.
materialclassified 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
God existing in the confines of our dimensions and time.
Light, like Yahuweh, is not only the universal constant; it is the purest form of energy. And energy is the source and substance of matter. At creation, when energy became matter through Einsteins E=mc2, the four-dimensional construct we call spacetime, began.
Scientists are completely baffled when it comes to explaining the nature of the strongest macro influence on the universe—gravity—the tendency of energy/matter to attract.
materialclassified 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And even if we were to stumble on gravitys nature or cause, we would then only understand ten percent of the forces influencing our observable reality. Ninety percent of the energy/matter at work in the universe is black, or invisible to our observations. This completely unknown effect provides a counter-force to gravity, demonstrating a repulsive nature.String Theory suggests this could be the result of several more dimensions, albeit within a point and thus acting at the micro-atomic level.
materialclassified 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Word and The Way third word is bara. It means to create in the sense of initiating something new which had not been in existence before. The term is used prolifically by Isaiah in the context of his Messianic prophecies, especially as he predicts the advent of the Renewed Covenant. Consistent with this regenerative and redemptive concept,bara means: creator, choice, transformation, dispatch, birth, perfection, perform a task, be cut down, and renewal, bringing back to a prior state.
materialclassified 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Bringing it all together, the first seven words reveal: In (ba - near, with, and in proximity to, regarding the account of) the beginning (reshith - at the start of time and the initiation of the process of existence, concerning the first fruits, the head of the family), God (elohym - the Mighty Ones) accordingly (et - accompanying and in association) created (bara - performed a miracle, choosing perfect transformation and renewed birth, conceiving, planning, ...cont.
materialclassified 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
preparing, and producing) the (ha) universe, the spiritual world (samayim - the heavens, and the abode of stars) and (wa) also (et) the (ha) material realm (erets - matter, the physical and natural world). (Genesis 1:1)
Now that is a little better take on Genesis before man changed the "WORD."
King and Cleric are guilty of keeping the world from knowing their true Creator.
Flee religion!!! It is why your Savior was put to death. He was removing the politics in religion. peace.
materialclassified 2 years ago
Let's have a fun comment, it's over 9,000 !!!!!! What it's only over 9,000, we have 400,000,000,000 here. Go home
diu7ni967 2 years ago
hmm...matter, yes it does to Yahweh your creator.
hmm..antimatter, yes it does to Satan the one who can't create.
materialclassified 2 years ago
waaaah?
what does antimatter have to do with Satan?
antimatter is simply matter made up of antiparticles which are simply particles with the opposite charge or spin of normally seen particles.
antimatter and matter have almost the exact same properties, create almost the exact same elements (like anti-hydrogen), but destroy each other when they collide leaving behind photons.
clarify how Satan is involved in all this.
Desarollo 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Read above. I believe you will come to understand just what Satans role will be.
materialclassified 2 years ago
no I really don't understand. Satan has nothing to do with antimatter. that's not even biblical. there isn't even the slightest suggestion in the bible that Satan will use antimatter or antiparticles in any way shape or form. your just making stuff up because you have a misunderstanding of some sort.
Desarollo 2 years ago 12
hell yeah... next time you will think twice before fucking around...
synofluna 2 years ago
I'm guessing that, if the energy is increased, the outcomes will trend to 100% separation of charge.
CACBCCCU 2 years ago
or adding tensors of ampheta to fly fast with fast thoughts that´s ufo moding hehe.
AI2flesh 2 years ago
there is only one thing to say, LOL!!!!!!!!!
AI2flesh 2 years ago
Without skin and bones and blood. Think of the morphing capabilities when you add intelligent conscience.
Explains so much of the unexplained.
Makes I Want to Believe into I Do Believe.
Let the work continue, so amazing.
drivenhome 2 years ago
Regarding elements, several unusual elements are created in laboratories and we have no reason to believe that some of them develop naturally. Furthermore, there are elements here on Earth that are only created in a supernova.
Lastly, on a completely unrelated note, I doubt that the videos you have posted on your "channel" are yours. The fact that they have their channel information stamped on the feed is pretty good "evidence" that you stole it.
You are quite the clever one.
lxcainxl 2 years ago
Comment removed
lxcainxl 2 years ago
re: KnightTactics
Actually, there is a fair amount of proof to back up the claims postulated regarding Big Bang theories. Substantiated proof is requisite in having a theory; even some degree of sound and observed logic is needed for just a hypothesis.
You might want to work on your grammar though; there are a couple of sentences that do not make much sense.
lxcainxl 2 years ago
the string theory is a stretch, don't hold your breath as many scientists would say. However, if you want the contemporary and more widely accepted version, I recommend searching and learning about E8 theory. It's got the details down, and it's based on charges and anti-charges that have and haven't been found. It's intuitive and science is consistently completing its empty table day by day. The higgs boson belongs to this table (its 8-dimensional)
azjolol 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No one can say the truth that 13 Biilion years ago existed and a Big Bang. There is no proof. You must understand we don't have the element that existed trillions of years. We only have the elements here in our earth, but not the elements from outside. Now stop dreaming and come to reality. If you go until the end of the wall universe, then you will see tons of elements that we don't have it here in our planets.
KnightTactics 2 years ago
OK, this is all very interesting, but they've been at this for awhile now. SHouldn't they be smashing Quarks and Gluons together by now to find out what's inside those little buggers. Maybe strings?? And many years before we start smashing "strings" ???
Maheekun 2 years ago
Quarks cannot exist in nature as single particles, they always occur in triplets. Gluons are virtual particles that carry the strong nuclear force, which holds quarks together with other quark triplets to form atomic nuclei. Plus, there are 6 types of quarks that vary by charge, magnitude of charge, and spin (plus others I'm sure I'm forgetting).
ozzyogkush 2 years ago
To clarify: they exist in triplets except in the high energy conditions present in this experiment.
ozzyogkush 2 years ago
Awesome!
redbeast2 2 years ago
Why gold and not something extremely common like say, CARBON?
P3tr4W45H3r3 2 years ago
@ P3tr4W45H3r3
They choose gold, not carbon for a number of reasons. First of all, carbon is a relatively light element, #14, where as gold is a heavier ion at #79. The heavier ion has a higher number of particles per ion which means more collisions and a better result.
There are other reasons, such as ion stability blah blah blah. Also, a specific isotope of gold was likely selected for specific properties.
Also, price doesn't matter when your dealing with a small number of particles.
AeroMagico 2 years ago 5
If they are trying to replicate somewhat just moments after the big bang, shouldnt they have used a building block like carbon seeing that everything has carbon in it?
P3tr4W45H3r3 2 years ago
soup looks nasty....I wouldn't eat that.
jm31563 2 years ago 2
@P3tr4W45H3r3 the choice if ions is determined what the current ion source can deliver as the heaviest nuclei, at CERN they use Pb. Next year RHIC will have a new source that can produce even heavier ions. RHIC also used deuterium and copper so far.
achimfranz 2 years ago
@achimfranz the reason i suggested carbon, is because it is believed to be a building block. Gold means nothing.
P3tr4W45H3r3 2 years ago
what do 'building blocks' have to do with it ? at these temperatures and pressures its about the quarks and gluons inside the nucleus and we need lots of them, therefor we use a heavy element. We also compared the gold with copper, deuterium and proton collisions to see the difference.
achimfranz 2 years ago
tell me what the purpose of this RHIC experiment again. in the very beginning it was announced that its purpose was to essentially create a big bang again and look at the results. If were not going by common "theory" we may as well be using an orange.
P3tr4W45H3r3 2 years ago
Carbon is an important element in biology, but that doesn't matter for this. Is that the reason you would suggest it? Also, it isn't as common as Hydrogen, Helium, Oxygen, and a few others.
See Franz' explanation for using a heavy ion.
lumpty22 2 years ago
They return to their homes early in the morning and feel guilty afterward.
Except the quarks; I hear they like threesomes.
lxcainxl 2 years ago
What happens to the the perfect liquid of quarks and gluons afterwards?
Maheekun 2 years ago
i am guessing it is something like what happens at CERN, they either collected it and stored it or(and i think this is more probable) it only exists for a certain period of time before it turns back into the original ions
TheFixer710 2 years ago
@Maheekun the quarks and gluons recombine to elementary particles which are then measured in the detectors. These remnants are all the experiments can see the quark-soup exists for only 10^-24 sec, that's a trillionth of a trillionth of a second.
achimfranz 2 years ago
How exciting!
ashleylynnjoan 2 years ago
thats sick
lespaulpride11 2 years ago
THAT was hot! Mmmmm...
Now I just need some hot Gluon-on-Gluon action!
lxcainxl 2 years ago 3
Cool stuff , I will feature this on my channel. I hope you will make more vids like this in the future.
BlueCollarScience 2 years ago