This is, like all neo-religious believe in the official Bible history of "Osama & the 19 Hijackers", hypocricy and stupidity to the fullest:
1st, there was NO doubt explosions at the bottom - not at initiation of the collapse but in the time before - to weaken the buildings: watch?v=rwhU15UY3Fc
2nd, the top-down demolition wich is compared with a WTC tower crumbling actually pretty much looks the same. (And there were also lots of squibs both during - and BEFORE - the collapses.)
This question is directed at the no planers who believe an alluminum plane could not penetrate a steel building.
Has it ever occured to you, that your theory is really fucked up? You say a 78 ton plane moving at 500mph could not penetrate the building, yet you claim it was a controlled demolition. How then, is 10 lbs of TNT able to destroy a steel column, but a 78 ton plane with 3500 gallons of jet fuel on board moving at 500+mph could not? No attacks neccesary just answer the damn question.
So a third explanation must be the truth, since it wasn't CD and OBVIOUSLY not the f%^ing plane crash that brought it down. I think it was a directed energy weapon, one WAY more sophisticated than the ones we know about, plus, if you're actually interested in knowing the facts rather than glazing over them to half assedly disprove some, research all the "toasted vehicles" in the area on that day
@DanSaw120285 Dan, you sound very dumb, how can you read four factual statements and completely disregard them? It can be two things, one you're actively part of the cover-up, or you just feel uncomfortable with the whole idea, it threatens your logic, your reasoning, you'd have to accept something within your self or others that you didn't want to, and you're a total douche thats got his head in the sand
Most likely, it wasn't a controlled demolition. But the fact remains, it took 9 SECONDS for the towers to fall, even with perfect controlled demolition set up with should have taken about a MINUTE AND A HALF!! 110 floors mind you. YES there was eye witness testimony of explosions in the basement and the injuries to prove it. NOT CD BLASTS. Man you're dumb. wake up dude
@MazJax Makes perfect sense - Just as Pearl Harbor ultimately justified attacking Germany even though the Japanese bombed the US ships. In the "War on Terror" it's a question of whether you are with US or you are against US. It's not an issue of nationality at all, everybody is a potential terrorist nowadays.
@Caballingus The USA didn't try and link the Pearl Harbor attacks to Germany... Unlike Bush who wanted so desperately for the attacks to have been the work of Saddam Hussein .
@MazJax Also, the overthrow of Iraq was planned well before Bush got in office. See H.R. 4655, signed in 98 by Clinton. 9/11 allowed our government support of preemptive strikes against any potential threat. What do you know? Iraq has WMD's. Can't have another 9/11. Let's go get 'em! Oh wait... no they didn't. The primary goal in the middle east is the overthrow of uncooperative governments. Oil (Iraq), Opium (Afghanistan), and establishing central banks are just added bonuses.
@ecclesiastes118 What the fuck does the clinton's invasion of iraq plans comment have to do with 9/11? Iraq had nothing to do with 911. WMD's? WTF? How could you get more off topic? The WMD's were by far, the biggest lie the government has told us in the past decade.
Hey, if they wanted oil, why not invade saudi arabia? They have more oil than Iraq. AND THERE WERE SAUDI HIJACKERS AS WELL! Why not invade saudi arabia if it was all about oil? Nooo, instead they invade...Iraq.
@MazJax What did Iraq have to do with 9/11? I just told you. It wasn't "all about oil." It was about overthrowing their government, as you seem to realize. The problem is people will only go to war if they fell threatened. 9/11 made the American people scared of the Middle East. That's why even though we wanted to invade Iraq for years, we didn't until after 9/11. We also didn't invade Saudi because we already have a measure of control over the Saudi government.
There isn't just one reason they do things, but many. Prior to the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, there were only 7 nations in the world without a privately controlled central bank: Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Cuba, and Libya. Now, you can take Iraq, Afghanistan, and most recently, Libya off that list. If you're unfamiliar with the whole central bank scam, you can watch the money masters here on youtube, or just listen to Ron Paul rave about it.
@Caballingus So, then you must believe Bush used 911 to invade Iraq, then looked for oil in Afghanistan, a country that had no oil to begin with.
If it was for oil, then why didn't the USA use 911 to invade, say, UAE, or Saudi Arabia instead? They have tonnes of oil. Why the dried up Afghanistan? There were Saudi and Emirati hijackers on the planes. But instead you say Bush "used" them to invade...Afghanistan... for oil...
@ecclesiastes118 They're too light, any gust of air would blow them away. It's light paper, just like the passport and the thousands of other papers in the WTC seen floating around. Heavy steel is way more susceptible to impact damage.
@MazJax Impact damage yes. Fire damage no. Air would not simply blow paper away if it's accompanied by fire. Let alone paper that didn't have anywhere to go. I can't even visualize the explosion knocking the passport out of Suqami's pocket without consuming it.
@ecclesiastes118 The compressed air was in the tower BEFORE the explosion had effect. Each and every piece of paper that survived the explosion was planted there on purpose by the government. That's the only logical answer, right?
@MazJax Oh come on man. Was the entire building engulfed in flames? Noooooooooo.... so it makes sense that you would find pieces of paper in the aftermath. Not every piece of paper in the building took a blast of jet-fueled fire at point blank range... If the passport was lying around in the open, with a clear route to escape the blast of fire, then you might have a case. Unfortunately, there's no logical reason to believe it was.... only wishful thinking.
The passport didn't take a jet fuel bast either. The jet fuel explosion was behind the passport. The passport was shot forward by the pressurized air from the cabin. As well as other papers seen flying immediately after the plane hits.
@MazJax That's not a provable statement. It's pure speculation, though I'll admit that it may be possible. But as I said before, my biggest problem is each plane comes equipped with a flight data recorder, and a cockpit voice recorder. I simply don't believe that they didn't find at least one of the four recorders. In short, they found evidence that pointed solely towards Muslim extremists (could have been fabricated), but evidence that may have pointed elsewhere just seemed to vanish.
These people claim its wrong because its an animation... Well smart guys, can you build several exact replicas of the WTC and destroy them using bombs as you claim? Please? Come on now... You know you want to...
Lol, watch the video I just posted below and see how the CD Explosives immediately bring the building down rather than the delay you are trying to show and there are none of the uniform squibs that you describe other than a massive oval ejections coming out on all sides! I love how this all has to be done in animation and is clearly not accurate, wonder if those two correlate?
Actually DISINFO agent, you forgot to search up TOP-DOWN Demolition on YouTube! Haha, jokes on you... you realize that they demolish buildings with explosives down, here's the link in case your brain can't function: watch?v=EY3nj728WPY see the explosives on every floor? And also this is all CGI, not real time idiot!
@Merlin5by5 /watch?v=VZ1E2NPl-s8 Verinage shows MASSIVE DECELERATION whereas controlled demolition can contribute to constant speed and acceleration as we saw in the Twin Tower's collapse. Also in the Verinage, there are no violent squibs being ejected.
Puur sounds ignorant or really sarcastic. This video does have some things like willy rodriguez saying there was an explosion on the top and another one from the 82 floor. If the explosion happened o
At the bottom you would see the building give way and willy not surviving.
So in the future we won't need no demolition experts any more, just make some office fires like in WTC 7 and your building will come down perfectly in its own footprint.......that would save us a lot of money and end the credit crisis!
Does any of this explain the presence of thermate and molten steel in the debris or is that a made up lie?
I just would like to know how lucky we were that random fire collapsed 3 buildings in on themselves, not allowing one side to weaken more then another and have the building fall to the side seems pretty lucky, what do you think the odds of that were? If it wasn't lucky then why do people waste so money of professional demolition?
At least we know nobody has profited from this tragedy.
@TheNYLibertarian Hmm let's see, since 9/11 the US is occupying or liberating via military occupation 2 countries. The patriot act was passed removing freedoms and empowering government (this act was passed through so hastily most of congress did not even read it). Oil companies have posted record profits term after term. Extra spending was voted through congress for a much larger military budget while the country buries itself in more debt.
@TheNYLibertarian As for the random fire, we all know they were caused by airplanes and somehow spread to building 7. The random part is that the fires burned the building uniformly not weakening any side before another and allowing all 3 building to collapse withing their footprints. So the load never tipped off center in all 3 cases, all walls gave out exactly equally. Demolition requires a lot of planning and has to be well carried out for this to happen on any other day besides 9/11.
@Kariakas They did weaken though, enough to bend the steel on the tops of the towers so that they would fall. If you actually watch the video, you could see the top parts of the building that caused the fall were tilted over. To conclude that it was a controlled demolition is idiotic. People would notice demolition crews drilling bombs into the foundation of their office. And even if it was "emptied out" which is a lie, they would still notice the building totally pulled apart as well as bombs.
@TheNYLibertarian you still dont see the point in order for the building to fall like it did all the steel beams supporting the towers would have to be severed in order to have it fall like that the fire was only on a couple of floors not the whole building so if it fell straight down it would of fell alot slower instead of falling with no resistance theremite was used no way the fire got that intense
@956crazyman19 If thermite was used, then not only would a lot of it have to be used, but it would also be discovered. So again, no witnesses inside the building, or working at ground zero have discovered any.
@TheNYLibertarian ok you still avoid the freefall thing but thermite was found in the dust as well as molten steel which fires can not do and your only defense is that they were found by reject college professors? lol gtfo the people who investegated the whole thing were by the government so of course they are going to cover it up
Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?
If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?
@TheNYLibertarian ok you still avoid the freefall thing but thermite was found in the dust as well as molten steel which fires can not do and your only defense is that they were found by reject college professors? lol gtfo the people who investegated the whole thing were by the government so of course they are going to cover it up
Good video to keep everyone honest. I think that there are far more people hoping that 911 was not an inside job but find too many holes in the official story. If American did not have a history of false flag operations, then people would be less suspicious.
Example 2 is so close in camparison... The only real difference is the prominent Squibs you show coming out the sides... IF I was to blow it up and not want anyone to know, I would make sure the squib shots were masked or dampened to make sure the visual was minimal from the outside.
0:46 is very close to what you see in collapse. Of course they did not demolish it like in 0:20 . If you want peoples to believe that there was only muslim terrorists you have to make it look like progressive collapse.
Your point on view is warping and i think that you just made this video to: 1st make you feel better by trying to convince others. 2nd to try get rid of this debate about 9/11 so you can live in you false reality with "bad, but no THAT bad government".
Your "downwards explosions" simulation looks a lot more like the real thing than your so-called real thing.
Also, I love how the "normal controlled demolition" simulation makes more smoke than the "real thing" simulation.
As for your "show me footage (...) being openly demolished" try looking at the WTC7 collapse for example or try to actually see all the tapes of the WTC2 and 1 collapses (especially those from very close). You'll see the flashes and fumes you know are typical of demolitions.
911 truthers just can't help themselves. They got stuck in a paradigm, invested in it, married to it, and now they're committed, the truth be damned. Which makes their name so ironic. Truth be told, everyone who watched that CBS night-line with Peter Jennings in 1997 heard bin Ladin make his infamous threat. Like everyone else, I simply couldn't believe he'd pull it off. And look how easy it was, cut a few passengers with box cutters and they commandeered the plane, all they did was steer it
You just demonstrated why they used a top down sequential explosive destruction, instead of the classic base up demolition, i.e. to prevent the falling tower scenario, and that would have been obvious. Collapse would not be symmetrical, but slow random crumbling. The mushrooming downward explosion of the Twins made terror propaganda and was more efficient for pulverizing the concrete and steel beams. .
But now try to apply your video "classic controlled demolition" to Building 7...if you dare.
You really need to research before you do stuff like this. The firemen warned everyone to get back because they were going to blow it up. This bit of information is in here if you wish to look. But it is so much easier to remain stuipd isnt it.SHEEPLE! The other building that were supose to have had planes flown into them were all a joke as well for there were no planes found in the locations. They were supposed to have vaporized on impact,lol,hahahaha,,yea right! Now GO AWAY!
@ApostleRon This is a COMPLETE LIE. Not one fireman said for people to get back because they were going to blow it up. You're a fucking liar. No planes found at the locations? Wrong again. Another lie. you are regurgitating 8 year old long since debunked meme's of the "truth" movement, half of which NONE of your leaders subscribe to anymore. Go away? Wake up? Sheeple? I have one for you...GROW UP ASSCLOWN. 911 was an outside job, go back to school dumbass.
the reality graphic is way off. there were explosions of white dust just below where the upper section what supposedly "pancaking" the lower ones. i'm just wondering how do you explain the molten steel found at all 3 of the demolished steel towers, plus the nano-thermite found, and the freefall speed from the failure until it met more resistance toward the end of the collapse.
just becuse you weak the floor plan is not go down and over like you show..its black and white and have nothing about whit reality to do..Deffentlig this building wash blow down but the also using other:?to get this building down..
They are not go down becuse hit by plan or fire..this is stupid joke.And you see core cut over wehn the top begin to falling-under all the smoke they soo demo every singel floor and why you only find human in pices.
@MadeUThink ur incoherent question cannot be answered... what is ur point? A CGI demo when there's real footage out there is slapping a horses ass and wondering why it kicked you.
@MadeUThink then explain me why there's more and more architects and engineers who claim this is a controlled demolition; i saw them fall live on TV like many others and my friends agreed they couldn't fall like that (and I even point that no steelframe has collapsed due to fire)... and before you reply something, you must know that i studied architecture and that i know what i'm talking about...
@Merlin5by5 Ok here I go. The first evidence is the way the towers collapse. I will follow with the fire issue later. I can agree with the plane crashing and spreading all fuel into the tower, and subsequently this fuel burns and melts the steel frame. Ok, that makes all the upper stages from the crash point fall. But what about the stages below the crash point? They haven't been "touched", so they may have not suffer. So why do they fall down to the tower base?
@Merlin5by5 I think that you, with your almightly knowledge of architecture (or was it physical properties?) can explain this to me. I don't care what the sheer stress was at the WTC or the polar moment of inertia, these data can be wrong, and you know it. But what we all know is that you don't make skyscrapers as weak as these data say; and we all know that all steel profiles are treated with a fireproof coating by law, so... what about the fire?
@Merlin5by5 I will tell you about a similar case happened in spain back in 1985: the fire at the Corona de Aragon Hotel. This hotel was built entirely in steelframe; it burned that night from a kitchen fire or the like, there was no explosion, no plane crashing into it, even there were no charges placed at the right position in order to proceed with a controlled demolition. The hotel burned all night and got ruined, but the only thing that stood up was the steel frame, naked.
@JulietsMan lol... after seeing how the Lord of the Rings was made, how does anyone believe the WMDs story or anything that isn't eyewitnessed? CGI is a shill's best tool, but anyone smarter then a 5th grader can "debunk" it.
There are many types of demolitions from which one is from down to top and the most recently developed one is the top to bottom, the twin towers were brought down by the second style. Don't mix your patriotic feelings for some criminals, who planed, designed, executed, covered-up and murdered 2800 people here in USA and 6 million innocent people over the Atlantic, and they are so honorable that they call most of the children insurgents. Discvr the truth; look at the right drctn: buildingwhat
lol, no they weren't. Buildings are demolished from the bottom, not the way the towers fell. Plus, the collapse started where the planes hit. Your 9/11 "truth" cult mythology just doesn't fit too well with what is observed. The buildings simply collpase with NO FUCKING EXPLOSIONS.
@IndividualParties You proud supporters of murders really need to start seeing the truth. It is a crime to go over to another land and murder innocent children, which by the way was done in Vietnam War too.
Obviously the twin towers were brought down with a mixture of demolition styles used. See “WTC 7 The smoking Gun” watch also -Loose change 2nd edition recut-. Stop supporting criminals.
LOL, loose change? Really? You believe that movie? hahahaha, you fuckin idiot. Why don't you watch "alien intereview." I heard they got a live alien at Area 51. Wake up!
@IndividualParties@IndividualParties I think you want to be sued, watch your mouth, or I have no chance but suing you! You are either one of the disinformants that this group of criminals - 9-11 designers and executers - hired or you are an easily well brain washed individual, who is called by HI-IQed people as an easily shepherded sheep.
WTC 7 ---OR--- BuildingwhatDOTorg says it all. Please check first and stop being a hell-bound follower.
@IndividualParties@IndividualParties I think you want to be sued, watch your mouth, or I have no chance but suing you! You are either one of the disinformants that this group of criminals - 9-11 designers and executers - hired or you are an easily well brain washed individual, who is called by HI-IQed people as an easily shepherded sheep.
WTC 7 ---OR--- BuildingwhatDOTorg says it all. Please check first and stop being a hell-bound follower.
@WhyAskQuestions please show me the image of which you speak. i have hundreds of images of the pile of steel & dust, and can find no elevator doors from wtc 1 or 2. please advise.....
@WhyAskQuestions i will accept you assertion "have to be" when you show me some. until then please realize you're responses are logical fallacies. assuming the conclusion. facts only, no assumptions.
You assume that the elevator doors "disappeared" from 2 110 story office buildings.
Well everyone knows that that would be impossible because no witnesses never claimed that the doors were "missing" during a renovation of the elevator shafts.
To assume that they "disappeared" is just fucking stupid on your part.
@WhyAskQuestions i will accept you assertions when you show me some evidence. i dont need to post links to the photos i mention, because everyone has and can look at the majority of them.
i don't assume door's disappeared, there just not in any pics i can find. IF YOU CAN SHOW ME SOME THEN I LOSE AND YOU WIN. until then, it's up in the air. conclusions require evidence.
@WhyAskQuestions I do not claim they 'disappeared'. I state, i have not found evidence of elevators in the debris pile, in any image i have seen in the last 8 years. you and "everyone else who has a brain" are warmly invited to Show me evidence. I do not use faith in my scientific method............
lol! truthers are are so stupid. they distrust the government that much where they actually believe the bullshit authors who just want to make a buck, are spewing.
What evidence? There's isn't any evidence from the Truth Movement. You're in a long line of idiots who haven't shown me evidence for their claims. Usually it's all talk & bullshit from Truthers.
Wake me up when & if you can prove that the Laws of Physics was "broken" on 9/11.
then why did the third building fall?" not touched, but fell? aint saying one way or other but dang, G men are born to lie, and been caught in lies so often not counting dirty deals. can you understand why we on the bottom of the dollar pile would think game were played, not counting no flim footage of the plane crashing into the G man building in Washington, not one photo of the plane?
sorry but the G men are the enemy of truth as I see it.
Where did I get the idea that the Truthers want to get rid of the U.S. Constitution? When Truthers started murdering government officials, like what happened in Tucson, Arizona.
I've already answer ALL of your fucking questions and you keep trying the same tired ole philosophy of "2+2=5 bc I say so"; pound that drum all that you want but your paranoid schizophrenia will never become the reality for the rest of the world!
The US military and its civilian leadership had the global intelligence, they had the FBI and CIA reports, and they had the terror warnings; they were ignored due to an intense sense of self-importance and denial. This is all besides the fact that every credible explosives, physics, and aviation expert the world over was questioned about their findings and they all came to the same conclusions = the 9/11 terrorist attacks were an outside job by Islamic fundamentalists!
@DeepSpace8andahalf If you pick up a gun & go up against the U.S. Government or kill a respected Government Official for something like "9/11 was an Inside Job by the Government", then it's treason & servile insurrection. Truthers want to rid the U.S. Constitution? They won't have it until it's pried from my cold dead fingers.
Truthers are like the JFK Assassination nutcases. They'll believe that 9/11 "wasn't" perped by a group of Terrorists, that Bin Laden couldn't have done it alone, that Bush was the "second gunman", & that the Government is keeping it all a "secret".
Fuck all the Truthers! The murder of a Federal Judge & attempted assassination of a congresswoman in Arizona proves that Truthers are conspiring to decapitate the U.S. Government, by any means nessesary.
I always believe CGI over reality every time!!! How convincing; a cartoon of how things happen, when there's real video footage of what happened and experts who agree it's not plausible unless manipulated, not to mention those at Ground Zero who were eye witness to unexplanable events. But ur cock-sure attempt to set straight the truthers is the finest attempt at brain-washing!! kudos for fx.
The 'atypical' top down demolition this video shows is the closest thing to real of all the versions you made. I notice that in the side by side comparison of the top down demolition you leave out the demolition squibs which were though part of the reality of 9/11. There are numerous demolition squibs in the videos of 9/11, each preceding the fall of the tower into that area, proving demolition of the building. LOOSE CHANGE Final Cut pt7 2of2 WORLD TRADE CENTER WTC
LOOSE CHANGE Final Cut pt7 2of2 WORLD TRADE CENTER WTC - The video top of the list by searching the aforementioned phrase on youtube shows an actual pancake collapsed steel structure building. All of the floors are apparent in the collapse, one floor sitting on top of another, piled up like a stack of pancakes. The only way to obliterate a building like happened on 9/11 is demolition.
the typically downward demo looks exactly the same as the supposed structural collapse this video credits a demolition instead of discrediting it .Whats this dude been smokin!!!
NIST is a hypotesis. EA911truth is a hypotesis. None off the thing are proven. What i think is remarkable, is all the coinsidences and lies told around 911.Specially in the official story. Hightechcaves in Afghanistan LOL
This propaganda discounts the fact that controlled demolitions can happen in innumerable ways. They could have set up the lobby to demolish first, then every floor from the plane strike to the bottom thermite demolished in sequence from top to bottom. They could have made it every other floor and that would leave bigger chunks of the building to pile up. They could have done just 3 sections and toppled the tower onto the surrounding land.
@danielvincentkelley What's important, that the tower fall into it's footprint, is that whole sections of the building are blasted simultaneously with exactly the same force and in opposed trajectory. So the SE supports being blasted to the NE are met by the simultaneous NE blast toward SE and so on for each direction the blasts are set. Moutainous evidence exists that WTC was a controlled demolition. This slick propaganda proves nothing but the treason of who posted it.
@grandmastershek How so you find my speculation idle? You've already disproven my speculation as idle in that you've not merely read it, but replied. So, already you're on shaky ground as an obvious disinformant. Supporting my claim that the blasts need to be set to kick in opposite directions: Newton's 3rd law of motion requiring equal and opposite reactions for every action. Far as mountainous evidence affirming demolition visit ae911truth dott org.
@grandmastershek watch?v=nUDoGuLpirc There's some of the evidence. Demolition squibs in the video. Pulverized concrete. Thermate in the smoldering wreck. Steel girders thrown 2 football fields from the base of the building and embeded in other buildings. People evacuating the building reporting the base of the building having been demolished BEFORE the collapse when they passed "the lobby" which was also video recorded from New Jersey, a plume of white smoke ascend from the ground floor of WTC.
Do controlled demolitions do that? Ooops...its called kinetic energy. Yeah I know only bombs can do that. But I am glad ae911truth has told you everything you need to know.
" reporting the base of the building having been demolished BEFORE"
Like Wil Rod? They guy who said he heard rumbles on 9/11 then explosions years later? Why don't you give us some direct sources?
@grandmastershek Controlled demonlitions COULD throw steel girders football fields distance, what matters to it is how much of what quality explosive is used. You attempt to give solidity to hot air. Thermate? Tests PROVE that it is in the dust as was gathered by a whistle blowing clean up worker.
@danielvincentkelley "a plume of white smoke ascend from the ground floor of WTC"
Wow! Someone could see the ground floor of the building from NJ? Thats amazing that someone could observe such a location through blocks of high rises. Think next time.
@grandmastershek Smoke rises dumb ass. So yeah, the explosion in the basement of the building, that demolished the lobby of WTC 1, as was reported by the last groups of people and firefighters to evacuate the building, did certainly throw smoke into the air FROM the base of the building, that was seen in a video from New Jersey. 9/11 CONSPIRACY: SMOKE AT BASE OF WTC RIGHT BEFORE COLLAPSE there's the search to see the video.
@grandmastershek Oh yeah, because a conspiracy of more than 1000 random architects and engineers want to push disinformation so that they can be castigated by society at large, as steered by the Major Media, and suffer career death, reduced earning potential, homelessness and general misery for taking a stance against the powers that be. You might wash that taste of crap out ya mouth that you been regurgitating, all those years of carcasses you chewed to oblivion.
@grandmastershek Where as the side that you're defending, the OFFICIAL version of the mass murderous events of 9/11, has profitted from almost 10 years of warfare, making and selling bombs and depleted uranium bullets and tanks and planes and helicopters and now drones and satellites and plasma rifles... You're an obvious aid to the mass murderous war profiteers, why don't you go now and die your pitiful miserable death before you do yourself any more damage aiding mass murderers.
@grandmastershek It's nice to hear you state that you were obviously blaspheming in calling my comment idle. "Definitely not idle." So then why did you say it king of stealth kindergarten communication, name calling then calling people on their ad hominem attacks on your obviously blaspheming, super dushy and war profitting soon to be the hunted in lieu of your having been the hunter, psychological warring nothingness of anything greatly valuable to humanity...
@gmshrek I know why you said it, because it's just part of the job, blaspheming all day, talking down 9/11 truth from the perspective of a very clever cunning and seemingly reasonable to most fools, agent of disinformation.That shit they told you, bout it being ok to kill people because it's what the strongest dead people all did and because all beings do it, whether they be eating veges or cutting heads off of screaming cows, is undulating shit.It's part of the lie they told you're lieing a$s.
evidently you made a cartoon rendition of the official fairytale so you don't remember what it REALLY LOOKS LIKE... let's compare.. yours.... to this one... shall we? watch?v=nUDoGuLpirc
You gotta love all the comments by all the cult followers of the truthiness movement. The believe some secret black ops goverment conspirators did 9/11 and then are stupid enough to blab about it online so that the government has a record of who to whack.
Do any of you goons actually think about that or do you think your cute little truthiness inspired screen name will protect your identity?
I've read a book called Critical Thinking In Psychology, a chapter about "the seductiveness of grand conspiracies". Interestingly, the book mentions several popular conspiracy theories such as Area 51 and JFK. The idiocy of people assuming 9/11 as an inside job are parallel. The same goes for the Moonlandinghoax. There appears to be a general psychological tendency for people to think that a significant event must have been caused by something similarly major, significant or powerful.
Good music shit video. A downward acceleration of the falling upper block implies a downward net force, which requires that the upward resistive force was less than the weight of the block. Therefore the downward force exerted by the falling block must also have been less than its weight. Since the lower section of the building was designed to support the tower, the reduced force exerted by the falling block was insufficient to crush at the point of most resistance. Simple Physics really.
Sooo.... you're admitting that the building would fall in free-fall speed without resistance WITHOUT demolition? How is that reality? 47 core columns providing vertical support would have slowed the collapse (given you adhere to the pancake theory).
"Floor-by-floor, they just started popping out. Boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom. It's as if they had planned to take down the building." ~ Eyewitness testimony by firefighters who were there. You choose NOT to believe them?
Haha is this a joke they do look very similer or is it just me? remember in order to pull this off the wtc1,1 and 7 must have been riddled with explosives. Debunkers always forget the many people that felt and heard the bombs, are those fire fighters ect insane? did they not hear bombs? if not what did they hear?
@MADE UTHINK~UR A GOD DAMMED IDIOT... the proper way to do A demolition would be to collapse the central [ INNER CORE } FIRST ~ soo THE BUILDING WOULD IMPLODE... look up the word you fucking ass hole { IMPLODE }
~!~
U SPENT ALOT OF TIME MAKING A VIDEO TO SUPPORT A CORRUPT GOVERNMENT & UR A SCUM BAG 4 DOING SO
~!`
AM I CLEAR ON THAT BOY ? I used to build bridges so you can kiss my dick if u think u know more about steel structures than I do...BOY... NEVER MIND, U WOULD LIKE THAT
This has been flagged as spam show
This is, like all neo-religious believe in the official Bible history of "Osama & the 19 Hijackers", hypocricy and stupidity to the fullest:
1st, there was NO doubt explosions at the bottom - not at initiation of the collapse but in the time before - to weaken the buildings: watch?v=rwhU15UY3Fc
2nd, the top-down demolition wich is compared with a WTC tower crumbling actually pretty much looks the same. (And there were also lots of squibs both during - and BEFORE - the collapses.)
Spot on, dude!
Thetan1974 2 weeks ago
This question is directed at the no planers who believe an alluminum plane could not penetrate a steel building.
Has it ever occured to you, that your theory is really fucked up? You say a 78 ton plane moving at 500mph could not penetrate the building, yet you claim it was a controlled demolition. How then, is 10 lbs of TNT able to destroy a steel column, but a 78 ton plane with 3500 gallons of jet fuel on board moving at 500+mph could not? No attacks neccesary just answer the damn question.
Ryan198416 3 weeks ago
yea you're pretty much what is wrong with the world
gregtool9 1 month ago
So a third explanation must be the truth, since it wasn't CD and OBVIOUSLY not the f%^ing plane crash that brought it down. I think it was a directed energy weapon, one WAY more sophisticated than the ones we know about, plus, if you're actually interested in knowing the facts rather than glazing over them to half assedly disprove some, research all the "toasted vehicles" in the area on that day
gregtool9 1 month ago
Comment removed
DanSaw120285 1 month ago
@DanSaw120285 Dan, you sound very dumb, how can you read four factual statements and completely disregard them? It can be two things, one you're actively part of the cover-up, or you just feel uncomfortable with the whole idea, it threatens your logic, your reasoning, you'd have to accept something within your self or others that you didn't want to, and you're a total douche thats got his head in the sand
gregtool9 1 month ago
@gregtool9
"Maybe 10" Yeah it was about 15 seconds but good guess there. I disregard the entire truth movement not just what you said so don't feel bad.
DanSaw120285 1 month ago
Most likely, it wasn't a controlled demolition. But the fact remains, it took 9 SECONDS for the towers to fall, even with perfect controlled demolition set up with should have taken about a MINUTE AND A HALF!! 110 floors mind you. YES there was eye witness testimony of explosions in the basement and the injuries to prove it. NOT CD BLASTS. Man you're dumb. wake up dude
gregtool9 1 month ago
@gregtool9
9 seconds? I suggest you learn how to time something because it was clearly longer than 9 seconds.
DanSaw120285 1 month ago
@DanSaw120285 ummmm, maybe 10, but not longer, what are you retarded?
gregtool9 1 month ago
how about doing a CGI animation showing Bush telling the true reason for attacking Iraq and Afghanistan?
Caballingus 2 months ago
@Caballingus Yeah, he staged an attack by Non-Iraqis in order to have a reason to invade Iraq. That makes total sense, right?
MazJax 2 months ago
@MazJax Makes perfect sense - Just as Pearl Harbor ultimately justified attacking Germany even though the Japanese bombed the US ships. In the "War on Terror" it's a question of whether you are with US or you are against US. It's not an issue of nationality at all, everybody is a potential terrorist nowadays.
Caballingus 2 months ago
@Caballingus The USA didn't try and link the Pearl Harbor attacks to Germany... Unlike Bush who wanted so desperately for the attacks to have been the work of Saddam Hussein .
MazJax 2 months ago
@MazJax Also, the overthrow of Iraq was planned well before Bush got in office. See H.R. 4655, signed in 98 by Clinton. 9/11 allowed our government support of preemptive strikes against any potential threat. What do you know? Iraq has WMD's. Can't have another 9/11. Let's go get 'em! Oh wait... no they didn't. The primary goal in the middle east is the overthrow of uncooperative governments. Oil (Iraq), Opium (Afghanistan), and establishing central banks are just added bonuses.
ecclesiastes118 2 months ago
@ecclesiastes118 What the fuck does the clinton's invasion of iraq plans comment have to do with 9/11? Iraq had nothing to do with 911. WMD's? WTF? How could you get more off topic? The WMD's were by far, the biggest lie the government has told us in the past decade.
Hey, if they wanted oil, why not invade saudi arabia? They have more oil than Iraq. AND THERE WERE SAUDI HIJACKERS AS WELL! Why not invade saudi arabia if it was all about oil? Nooo, instead they invade...Iraq.
MazJax 2 months ago
@MazJax What did Iraq have to do with 9/11? I just told you. It wasn't "all about oil." It was about overthrowing their government, as you seem to realize. The problem is people will only go to war if they fell threatened. 9/11 made the American people scared of the Middle East. That's why even though we wanted to invade Iraq for years, we didn't until after 9/11. We also didn't invade Saudi because we already have a measure of control over the Saudi government.
Continued:
ecclesiastes118 2 months ago
Continue:
There isn't just one reason they do things, but many. Prior to the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, there were only 7 nations in the world without a privately controlled central bank: Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Cuba, and Libya. Now, you can take Iraq, Afghanistan, and most recently, Libya off that list. If you're unfamiliar with the whole central bank scam, you can watch the money masters here on youtube, or just listen to Ron Paul rave about it.
ecclesiastes118 2 months ago
@Caballingus So, then you must believe Bush used 911 to invade Iraq, then looked for oil in Afghanistan, a country that had no oil to begin with.
If it was for oil, then why didn't the USA use 911 to invade, say, UAE, or Saudi Arabia instead? They have tonnes of oil. Why the dried up Afghanistan? There were Saudi and Emirati hijackers on the planes. But instead you say Bush "used" them to invade...Afghanistan... for oil...
MazJax 2 months ago
Instead of steel, they should have made the support columns out of passports. Apparently they're more durable...
ecclesiastes118 3 months ago
@ecclesiastes118 They're too light, any gust of air would blow them away. It's light paper, just like the passport and the thousands of other papers in the WTC seen floating around. Heavy steel is way more susceptible to impact damage.
MazJax 3 months ago
@MazJax Impact damage yes. Fire damage no. Air would not simply blow paper away if it's accompanied by fire. Let alone paper that didn't have anywhere to go. I can't even visualize the explosion knocking the passport out of Suqami's pocket without consuming it.
ecclesiastes118 3 months ago
@ecclesiastes118 The compressed air was in the tower BEFORE the explosion had effect. Each and every piece of paper that survived the explosion was planted there on purpose by the government. That's the only logical answer, right?
MazJax 2 months ago
@MazJax Oh come on man. Was the entire building engulfed in flames? Noooooooooo.... so it makes sense that you would find pieces of paper in the aftermath. Not every piece of paper in the building took a blast of jet-fueled fire at point blank range... If the passport was lying around in the open, with a clear route to escape the blast of fire, then you might have a case. Unfortunately, there's no logical reason to believe it was.... only wishful thinking.
ecclesiastes118 2 months ago
@ecclesiastes118
The passport didn't take a jet fuel bast either. The jet fuel explosion was behind the passport. The passport was shot forward by the pressurized air from the cabin. As well as other papers seen flying immediately after the plane hits.
MazJax 2 months ago
@MazJax That's not a provable statement. It's pure speculation, though I'll admit that it may be possible. But as I said before, my biggest problem is each plane comes equipped with a flight data recorder, and a cockpit voice recorder. I simply don't believe that they didn't find at least one of the four recorders. In short, they found evidence that pointed solely towards Muslim extremists (could have been fabricated), but evidence that may have pointed elsewhere just seemed to vanish.
ecclesiastes118 2 months ago
These people claim its wrong because its an animation... Well smart guys, can you build several exact replicas of the WTC and destroy them using bombs as you claim? Please? Come on now... You know you want to...
MazJax 3 months ago
FINALLY! I found a video of what a controlled demo WOULD have looked like! Thanks
MazJax 3 months ago
WOW! CGI is now the new TRUTH!
lololololololol what a fucking dullard!
dobberdoss 4 months ago
Dimitri Khalezov. Pls debunk him.
Timeris2612 4 months ago
watch: north tower vs controlled demolition
sacer111 4 months ago
Lol, watch the video I just posted below and see how the CD Explosives immediately bring the building down rather than the delay you are trying to show and there are none of the uniform squibs that you describe other than a massive oval ejections coming out on all sides! I love how this all has to be done in animation and is clearly not accurate, wonder if those two correlate?
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
Actually DISINFO agent, you forgot to search up TOP-DOWN Demolition on YouTube! Haha, jokes on you... you realize that they demolish buildings with explosives down, here's the link in case your brain can't function: watch?v=EY3nj728WPY see the explosives on every floor? And also this is all CGI, not real time idiot!
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
@NothingAtAllXD
LMAO, TOP-DOWN demolition, as in VERINAGE, is painfully obvious on video.
It requires a physical DEFORMATION of the building by HUNDREDS of VW BUG
sized Hydraulic Jacks, linked together to a wired control jack and an engineer.
Where was all that? We can't even find explosives debris. EVER
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 /watch?v=VZ1E2NPl-s8 Verinage shows MASSIVE DECELERATION whereas controlled demolition can contribute to constant speed and acceleration as we saw in the Twin Tower's collapse. Also in the Verinage, there are no violent squibs being ejected.
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
@NothingAtAllXD
VERINAGE has to this point, NEVER had 13 floors as the Upper Block.
The verinage YOU pointed to has less than SIX floors. As for the Squibs?
Squibs are a HOLLYWOOD term, dumbass, for special effects charges.
IF you are talking about compressed air ejections, that doesn't exist
because VERINAGE contractors REMOVE the entire curtain wall.
Didn't you notice that? IT's IN YOUR VIDEO. How dumb are you?
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Merlin5by5 Read this link: 911debunkers blogspot com/2010/02/debunker-verinage-fantasies-are-bunk html
NothingAtAllXD 4 months ago
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
12weasel100 5 months ago
well the explosion going downward yes looks the same exeplt for the fire...
williamscrazyk10 5 months ago
Puur sounds ignorant or really sarcastic. This video does have some things like willy rodriguez saying there was an explosion on the top and another one from the 82 floor. If the explosion happened o
At the bottom you would see the building give way and willy not surviving.
warlord2080 5 months ago
So in the future we won't need no demolition experts any more, just make some office fires like in WTC 7 and your building will come down perfectly in its own footprint.......that would save us a lot of money and end the credit crisis!
puurlijknbatsie 5 months ago
Your name suits you. you did make me think, think what a fucking moron.
TheRenekruse 6 months ago
Superb!
neutrino741 6 months ago
Does any of this explain the presence of thermate and molten steel in the debris or is that a made up lie?
I just would like to know how lucky we were that random fire collapsed 3 buildings in on themselves, not allowing one side to weaken more then another and have the building fall to the side seems pretty lucky, what do you think the odds of that were? If it wasn't lucky then why do people waste so money of professional demolition?
At least we know nobody has profited from this tragedy.
Kariakas 6 months ago
@Kariakas There wasn't a presence of thermate, or molten steel, that was made up by a bunch of college reject professors.
We're not lucky to have three thousand people die and the fire wasn't random, it was caused by jets crashing into buildings.
Nobody has profited from this, that's another lie.
TheNYLibertarian 6 months ago
@TheNYLibertarian Hmm let's see, since 9/11 the US is occupying or liberating via military occupation 2 countries. The patriot act was passed removing freedoms and empowering government (this act was passed through so hastily most of congress did not even read it). Oil companies have posted record profits term after term. Extra spending was voted through congress for a much larger military budget while the country buries itself in more debt.
And you think nobody has profited? Sure bud.
Kariakas 6 months ago
@TheNYLibertarian As for the random fire, we all know they were caused by airplanes and somehow spread to building 7. The random part is that the fires burned the building uniformly not weakening any side before another and allowing all 3 building to collapse withing their footprints. So the load never tipped off center in all 3 cases, all walls gave out exactly equally. Demolition requires a lot of planning and has to be well carried out for this to happen on any other day besides 9/11.
Kariakas 6 months ago
@Kariakas They did weaken though, enough to bend the steel on the tops of the towers so that they would fall. If you actually watch the video, you could see the top parts of the building that caused the fall were tilted over. To conclude that it was a controlled demolition is idiotic. People would notice demolition crews drilling bombs into the foundation of their office. And even if it was "emptied out" which is a lie, they would still notice the building totally pulled apart as well as bombs.
TheNYLibertarian 6 months ago
@TheNYLibertarian you still dont see the point in order for the building to fall like it did all the steel beams supporting the towers would have to be severed in order to have it fall like that the fire was only on a couple of floors not the whole building so if it fell straight down it would of fell alot slower instead of falling with no resistance theremite was used no way the fire got that intense
956crazyman19 5 months ago
@956crazyman19 If thermite was used, then not only would a lot of it have to be used, but it would also be discovered. So again, no witnesses inside the building, or working at ground zero have discovered any.
TheNYLibertarian 5 months ago
@TheNYLibertarian ok you still avoid the freefall thing but thermite was found in the dust as well as molten steel which fires can not do and your only defense is that they were found by reject college professors? lol gtfo the people who investegated the whole thing were by the government so of course they are going to cover it up
956crazyman19 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@956crazyman19
MOLTEN ALUMINUM!
Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?
If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?
911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
ctcole77 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheNYLibertarian ok you still avoid the freefall thing but thermite was found in the dust as well as molten steel which fires can not do and your only defense is that they were found by reject college professors? lol gtfo the people who investegated the whole thing were by the government so of course they are going to cover it up
956crazyman19 5 months ago
Nice try!!!
Vaobat 6 months ago
Good video to keep everyone honest. I think that there are far more people hoping that 911 was not an inside job but find too many holes in the official story. If American did not have a history of false flag operations, then people would be less suspicious.
gravityjunkie47 6 months ago
Example 2 is so close in camparison... The only real difference is the prominent Squibs you show coming out the sides... IF I was to blow it up and not want anyone to know, I would make sure the squib shots were masked or dampened to make sure the visual was minimal from the outside.
knjpap 6 months ago
@knjpap then what about the noise? the flashes?
ElxxChupacabra07 6 months ago
0:46 is very close to what you see in collapse. Of course they did not demolish it like in 0:20 . If you want peoples to believe that there was only muslim terrorists you have to make it look like progressive collapse.
Your point on view is warping and i think that you just made this video to: 1st make you feel better by trying to convince others. 2nd to try get rid of this debate about 9/11 so you can live in you false reality with "bad, but no THAT bad government".
Sorry.. thats what i see. :/
KBendix 6 months ago
Your "downwards explosions" simulation looks a lot more like the real thing than your so-called real thing.
Also, I love how the "normal controlled demolition" simulation makes more smoke than the "real thing" simulation.
As for your "show me footage (...) being openly demolished" try looking at the WTC7 collapse for example or try to actually see all the tapes of the WTC2 and 1 collapses (especially those from very close). You'll see the flashes and fumes you know are typical of demolitions.
Sy3m 6 months ago
911 truthers just can't help themselves. They got stuck in a paradigm, invested in it, married to it, and now they're committed, the truth be damned. Which makes their name so ironic. Truth be told, everyone who watched that CBS night-line with Peter Jennings in 1997 heard bin Ladin make his infamous threat. Like everyone else, I simply couldn't believe he'd pull it off. And look how easy it was, cut a few passengers with box cutters and they commandeered the plane, all they did was steer it
constitutionfst 7 months ago
BBBWWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
THAT IS ALL CARRY ON.
BBBWWWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHA
MrWuzup420 7 months ago
You just demonstrated why they used a top down sequential explosive destruction, instead of the classic base up demolition, i.e. to prevent the falling tower scenario, and that would have been obvious. Collapse would not be symmetrical, but slow random crumbling. The mushrooming downward explosion of the Twins made terror propaganda and was more efficient for pulverizing the concrete and steel beams. .
But now try to apply your video "classic controlled demolition" to Building 7...if you dare.
blueridgewv 7 months ago
FAIL
JulietsMan 7 months ago
loser!
matthew5526 8 months ago
You really need to research before you do stuff like this. The firemen warned everyone to get back because they were going to blow it up. This bit of information is in here if you wish to look. But it is so much easier to remain stuipd isnt it.SHEEPLE! The other building that were supose to have had planes flown into them were all a joke as well for there were no planes found in the locations. They were supposed to have vaporized on impact,lol,hahahaha,,yea right! Now GO AWAY!
ApostleRon 9 months ago
@ApostleRon This is a COMPLETE LIE. Not one fireman said for people to get back because they were going to blow it up. You're a fucking liar. No planes found at the locations? Wrong again. Another lie. you are regurgitating 8 year old long since debunked meme's of the "truth" movement, half of which NONE of your leaders subscribe to anymore. Go away? Wake up? Sheeple? I have one for you...GROW UP ASSCLOWN. 911 was an outside job, go back to school dumbass.
Oz1976 8 months ago
the reality graphic is way off. there were explosions of white dust just below where the upper section what supposedly "pancaking" the lower ones. i'm just wondering how do you explain the molten steel found at all 3 of the demolished steel towers, plus the nano-thermite found, and the freefall speed from the failure until it met more resistance toward the end of the collapse.
fballplayer2324 9 months ago
what is the force that pushes the heavy steel beams and large chunks of concrete upward and outward? Keeping in mind gravity acts downward.
KS8730 10 months ago
just becuse you weak the floor plan is not go down and over like you show..its black and white and have nothing about whit reality to do..Deffentlig this building wash blow down but the also using other:?to get this building down..
They are not go down becuse hit by plan or fire..this is stupid joke.And you see core cut over wehn the top begin to falling-under all the smoke they soo demo every singel floor and why you only find human in pices.
MultiAirbrusher 10 months ago
Credible... because nothing proves truth better then CGI.
threepercenter03 10 months ago 9
@threepercenter03 Then show me footage of a World Trade Center building being openly demolished.
MadeUThink 10 months ago
@MadeUThink ur incoherent question cannot be answered... what is ur point? A CGI demo when there's real footage out there is slapping a horses ass and wondering why it kicked you.
threepercenter03 7 months ago
@MadeUThink then explain me why there's more and more architects and engineers who claim this is a controlled demolition; i saw them fall live on TV like many others and my friends agreed they couldn't fall like that (and I even point that no steelframe has collapsed due to fire)... and before you reply something, you must know that i studied architecture and that i know what i'm talking about...
MrRaymondscott 5 months ago
@MrRaymondscott
Like for reals? Oh wow, you saw conspiracy nuts on TV, and figured that they could
NOT be wrong, because of what? Their vast experience in building skyscrapers?
YOUR vast experience in building skyscrapers? Or as you studied architecture?
LMAO, why don't you just explain it from an architectural point of view?
What's the shear stress at the WTC, the Polar Moment of Inertia? They are both
published, Why not explain how they could resist a plane and 105 minutes
of fire?
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 Ok here I go. The first evidence is the way the towers collapse. I will follow with the fire issue later. I can agree with the plane crashing and spreading all fuel into the tower, and subsequently this fuel burns and melts the steel frame. Ok, that makes all the upper stages from the crash point fall. But what about the stages below the crash point? They haven't been "touched", so they may have not suffer. So why do they fall down to the tower base?
MrRaymondscott 2 weeks ago
@MrRaymondscott
Nobody from the US establishment has EVER claim the steel melted,
and NOTHING has ever showed a molten steel pool at the WTC.
All the fires did was raise the temp of the steel to a failure point.
Like your dick, soft and floppy doesn't cut it when the fat lady
sits. Thats a 130 million pound, WTC fat lady.
Merlin5by5 2 weeks ago
@Merlin5by5 I think that you, with your almightly knowledge of architecture (or was it physical properties?) can explain this to me. I don't care what the sheer stress was at the WTC or the polar moment of inertia, these data can be wrong, and you know it. But what we all know is that you don't make skyscrapers as weak as these data say; and we all know that all steel profiles are treated with a fireproof coating by law, so... what about the fire?
MrRaymondscott 2 weeks ago
@MrRaymondscott
No, actually, this data is NOT merely data, it's the parameters of the
building, Dumbass. The Shear strength of the steel frame is just as
critical to the building standing as it was to the building falling down.
That's why elevators have POSTED WEIGHT LIMITS.
So idiots like you, don't drag weight up to floors systems that can't
support that weight. That's right, Sonny boy, it's idiot proofing
for buildings.
Merlin5by5 2 weeks ago
@Merlin5by5 I will tell you about a similar case happened in spain back in 1985: the fire at the Corona de Aragon Hotel. This hotel was built entirely in steelframe; it burned that night from a kitchen fire or the like, there was no explosion, no plane crashing into it, even there were no charges placed at the right position in order to proceed with a controlled demolition. The hotel burned all night and got ruined, but the only thing that stood up was the steel frame, naked.
MrRaymondscott 2 weeks ago
@MrRaymondscott
Your kinda missing the point. They didn't reuse the steel frame.
BECAUSE IT HAD BEEN DAMAGED BY THE FIRE.
That's the whole point, Dumbass. What do you think would have
happened to your Corona de Aragon Hotel if it had 130 MILLION
pounds overhead?
Merlin5by5 2 weeks ago
@MadeUThink why wasn't wtc7 included in the original NIST report??
drewsiboberinski 4 months ago
@threepercenter03 hahahahah. BEST comment ever. Thats why I know everythnig in 300 and Avatar is EXACTLY how it happened in REALITY ...CGI proves it.
JulietsMan 7 months ago
@JulietsMan lol... after seeing how the Lord of the Rings was made, how does anyone believe the WMDs story or anything that isn't eyewitnessed? CGI is a shill's best tool, but anyone smarter then a 5th grader can "debunk" it.
threepercenter03 7 months ago
world trade center was a top down demolition.
xcited4vids 11 months ago
There are many types of demolitions from which one is from down to top and the most recently developed one is the top to bottom, the twin towers were brought down by the second style. Don't mix your patriotic feelings for some criminals, who planed, designed, executed, covered-up and murdered 2800 people here in USA and 6 million innocent people over the Atlantic, and they are so honorable that they call most of the children insurgents. Discvr the truth; look at the right drctn: buildingwhat
jamesguenes 1 year ago
@jamesguenes
lol, no they weren't. Buildings are demolished from the bottom, not the way the towers fell. Plus, the collapse started where the planes hit. Your 9/11 "truth" cult mythology just doesn't fit too well with what is observed. The buildings simply collpase with NO FUCKING EXPLOSIONS.
IndividualParties 6 months ago
@IndividualParties You proud supporters of murders really need to start seeing the truth. It is a crime to go over to another land and murder innocent children, which by the way was done in Vietnam War too.
Obviously the twin towers were brought down with a mixture of demolition styles used. See “WTC 7 The smoking Gun” watch also -Loose change 2nd edition recut-. Stop supporting criminals.
jamesguenes 6 months ago
@jamesguenes
LOL, loose change? Really? You believe that movie? hahahaha, you fuckin idiot. Why don't you watch "alien intereview." I heard they got a live alien at Area 51. Wake up!
IndividualParties 6 months ago
@IndividualParties @IndividualParties I think you want to be sued, watch your mouth, or I have no chance but suing you! You are either one of the disinformants that this group of criminals - 9-11 designers and executers - hired or you are an easily well brain washed individual, who is called by HI-IQed people as an easily shepherded sheep.
WTC 7 ---OR--- BuildingwhatDOTorg says it all. Please check first and stop being a hell-bound follower.
CHECK first.
jamesguenes 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IndividualParties @IndividualParties I think you want to be sued, watch your mouth, or I have no chance but suing you! You are either one of the disinformants that this group of criminals - 9-11 designers and executers - hired or you are an easily well brain washed individual, who is called by HI-IQed people as an easily shepherded sheep.
WTC 7 ---OR--- BuildingwhatDOTorg says it all. Please check first and stop being a hell-bound follower.
CHECK first.
jamesguenes 6 months ago
In the WTC Demolition, not conventional Demolition Methods (C4 Plastic) were used, Thermite was used, melted the Steel inside of the Building.
BaronJi 1 year ago
@BaronJi Just stop embarrassing yourself already.
DarkeyWhite 11 months ago
@BaronJi exactly
calipariwildcats23 10 months ago
@calipariwildcats23
US Military Technology.
BaronJi 10 months ago
And now, do this with WTC7 :)
Sadochinero 1 year ago
@Sadochinero I did. Check my videos for the Jeopardy one. I'd link you, but this page won't allow for that.
MadeUThink 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sadochinero,
.
"And now, do this with WTC7 :)"
.
Sure. No problem. See WTC 5. QED.
Next question/suggestion/claim please...
wimahlers 3 months ago
"would be" and "could be" are not absolute statements.
do you still provide no evidence ?, i'm done with you.
anyone out there can check my assertions.
google; ground zero debris pile pictures. i'll respond to any photos anyone finds.
homiescopies 1 year ago
@homiescopies
The elevator doors were in the debris pile. No "ifs", "ands" or "buts" about it.
You're done with me? Good! Go back outside and play hide and go fuck yourself.
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
@WhyAskQuestions great, can you show me?
homiescopies 1 year ago
@homiescopies
americanhistory . si . edu/september11/collection/record . asp?ID=75
Here's some elevator artifacts.
If there's artifacts, then the doors were in the debris pile along with those artifacts.
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
this is a perfect example of a 'straw man', or a Logical Fallacy.
good job. you debunked your own animation. (a very poor one at that)
now tell me how fire and gravity made 22,000 elevator doors (made of steel)
disappear ?
homiescopies 1 year ago
@homiescopies
"now tell me how fire and gravity made 22,000 elevator doors (made of steel) disappear ?"
I guess that big pile of debris doesn't mean a thing to you, does it?
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
@WhyAskQuestions please show me the image of which you speak. i have hundreds of images of the pile of steel & dust, and can find no elevator doors from wtc 1 or 2. please advise.....
homiescopies 1 year ago
@homiescopies
Well, the doors have to be in the debris pile. So what's your excuse?
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
@WhyAskQuestions i will accept you assertion "have to be" when you show me some. until then please realize you're responses are logical fallacies. assuming the conclusion. facts only, no assumptions.
homiescopies 1 year ago
@homiescopies
"you're responses are logical fallacies. assuming the conclusion. facts only, no assumptions"
And you have no evidence to counter with? Typcial Truther idiotcy!
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
@homiescopies
Stupid is as stupid does I suppose.
You assume that the elevator doors "disappeared" from 2 110 story office buildings.
Well everyone knows that that would be impossible because no witnesses never claimed that the doors were "missing" during a renovation of the elevator shafts.
To assume that they "disappeared" is just fucking stupid on your part.
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
@WhyAskQuestions i will accept you assertions when you show me some evidence. i dont need to post links to the photos i mention, because everyone has and can look at the majority of them.
i don't assume door's disappeared, there just not in any pics i can find. IF YOU CAN SHOW ME SOME THEN I LOSE AND YOU WIN. until then, it's up in the air. conclusions require evidence.
SHOW ME SOMETHING BESIDES NAME CALLING.
homiescopies 1 year ago
@homiescopies
Repeating the same stupid shit I see.
Well I know and everyone else who has a brain knows that the elevator doors didn't "disappear" and they were within the debris pile.
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
@WhyAskQuestions I do not claim they 'disappeared'. I state, i have not found evidence of elevators in the debris pile, in any image i have seen in the last 8 years. you and "everyone else who has a brain" are warmly invited to Show me evidence. I do not use faith in my scientific method............
homiescopies 1 year ago
@homiescopies
"i have not found evidence of elevators in the debris pile"
That's just plain stupid on your part.
Of course the elevator doors would be in the debris pile. Where else could they be?
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
(((>>>)))
lol! truthers are are so stupid. they distrust the government that much where they actually believe the bullshit authors who just want to make a buck, are spewing.
ffyren509 1 year ago
@DeepSpace8andahalf
What evidence? There's isn't any evidence from the Truth Movement. You're in a long line of idiots who haven't shown me evidence for their claims. Usually it's all talk & bullshit from Truthers.
Wake me up when & if you can prove that the Laws of Physics was "broken" on 9/11.
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
@DeepSpace8andahalf
If you imply that the Laws of Physics was "broken", then you're wrong.
If it's all a big lie, then why don't you have any evidence? Oh that's right, you don't, so it's not a lie.
You ignore the evidence, I don't!
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
@DeepSpace8andahalf
Now you're losing it! LOL!
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
@DeepSpace8andahalf
"HOW was the energy focused in order to COMPLETELY DESTROY both WTC towers?"
Downward! Gravity has that effect!
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
then why did the third building fall?" not touched, but fell? aint saying one way or other but dang, G men are born to lie, and been caught in lies so often not counting dirty deals. can you understand why we on the bottom of the dollar pile would think game were played, not counting no flim footage of the plane crashing into the G man building in Washington, not one photo of the plane?
sorry but the G men are the enemy of truth as I see it.
donze52 1 year ago
@DeepSpace8andahalf It's not hard to figure that GRAVITY is the result of collapse. (rolls eyes)
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
@DeepSpace8andahalf This is the problem with you Truthers, you people think it's always a political thing? Well it's not!
We have a problem alright, it's called Truthers.
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
@DeepSpace8andahalf
Where did I get the idea that the Truthers want to get rid of the U.S. Constitution? When Truthers started murdering government officials, like what happened in Tucson, Arizona.
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
@DeepSpace:
I've already answer ALL of your fucking questions and you keep trying the same tired ole philosophy of "2+2=5 bc I say so"; pound that drum all that you want but your paranoid schizophrenia will never become the reality for the rest of the world!
Go to Hell!
Wow, look at the size of your FAIL.
SpookeyR 1 year ago
@DeepSpace:
The US military and its civilian leadership had the global intelligence, they had the FBI and CIA reports, and they had the terror warnings; they were ignored due to an intense sense of self-importance and denial. This is all besides the fact that every credible explosives, physics, and aviation expert the world over was questioned about their findings and they all came to the same conclusions = the 9/11 terrorist attacks were an outside job by Islamic fundamentalists!
SpookeyR 1 year ago
@DeepSpace8andahalf If you pick up a gun & go up against the U.S. Government or kill a respected Government Official for something like "9/11 was an Inside Job by the Government", then it's treason & servile insurrection. Truthers want to rid the U.S. Constitution? They won't have it until it's pried from my cold dead fingers.
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
What was this made with?
Weirdo10o4 1 year ago
Sorry, Debumpkin, but this ridiculous pre-conceived conclusion video was a waste of your time.
Unless my unbridled laughter at your reasoning was your goal.
OneVoiceMore 1 year ago
Truthers are like the JFK Assassination nutcases. They'll believe that 9/11 "wasn't" perped by a group of Terrorists, that Bin Laden couldn't have done it alone, that Bush was the "second gunman", & that the Government is keeping it all a "secret".
Fuck all the Truthers! The murder of a Federal Judge & attempted assassination of a congresswoman in Arizona proves that Truthers are conspiring to decapitate the U.S. Government, by any means nessesary.
WhyAskQuestions 1 year ago
I always believe CGI over reality every time!!! How convincing; a cartoon of how things happen, when there's real video footage of what happened and experts who agree it's not plausible unless manipulated, not to mention those at Ground Zero who were eye witness to unexplanable events. But ur cock-sure attempt to set straight the truthers is the finest attempt at brain-washing!! kudos for fx.
threepercenter03 1 year ago
The 'atypical' top down demolition this video shows is the closest thing to real of all the versions you made. I notice that in the side by side comparison of the top down demolition you leave out the demolition squibs which were though part of the reality of 9/11. There are numerous demolition squibs in the videos of 9/11, each preceding the fall of the tower into that area, proving demolition of the building. LOOSE CHANGE Final Cut pt7 2of2 WORLD TRADE CENTER WTC
danielvincentkelley 1 year ago
LOOSE CHANGE Final Cut pt7 2of2 WORLD TRADE CENTER WTC - The video top of the list by searching the aforementioned phrase on youtube shows an actual pancake collapsed steel structure building. All of the floors are apparent in the collapse, one floor sitting on top of another, piled up like a stack of pancakes. The only way to obliterate a building like happened on 9/11 is demolition.
danielvincentkelley 1 year ago
the typically downward demo looks exactly the same as the supposed structural collapse this video credits a demolition instead of discrediting it .Whats this dude been smokin!!!
AHELLODTHERE 1 year ago
Great job!
Would you like to make a video of WTC7 collapsing by controlled demolition and compare THAT to reality?
Thanks!
Skeptic121 1 year ago
NIST is a hypotesis. EA911truth is a hypotesis. None off the thing are proven. What i think is remarkable, is all the coinsidences and lies told around 911.Specially in the official story. Hightechcaves in Afghanistan LOL
TheoriginalGrumphy 1 year ago
@TheoriginalGrumphy Who said anything about hi tech caves?
grandmastershek 1 year ago
This propaganda discounts the fact that controlled demolitions can happen in innumerable ways. They could have set up the lobby to demolish first, then every floor from the plane strike to the bottom thermite demolished in sequence from top to bottom. They could have made it every other floor and that would leave bigger chunks of the building to pile up. They could have done just 3 sections and toppled the tower onto the surrounding land.
danielvincentkelley 1 year ago
@danielvincentkelley What's important, that the tower fall into it's footprint, is that whole sections of the building are blasted simultaneously with exactly the same force and in opposed trajectory. So the SE supports being blasted to the NE are met by the simultaneous NE blast toward SE and so on for each direction the blasts are set. Moutainous evidence exists that WTC was a controlled demolition. This slick propaganda proves nothing but the treason of who posted it.
danielvincentkelley 1 year ago
@danielvincentkelley Do you have anything to support your claims other than your idle speculation?
grandmastershek 1 year ago
@grandmastershek How so you find my speculation idle? You've already disproven my speculation as idle in that you've not merely read it, but replied. So, already you're on shaky ground as an obvious disinformant. Supporting my claim that the blasts need to be set to kick in opposite directions: Newton's 3rd law of motion requiring equal and opposite reactions for every action. Far as mountainous evidence affirming demolition visit ae911truth dott org.
danielvincentkelley 1 year ago
@danielvincentkelley AE911truth is a sham run by scam master Richard Gage. His theories were disproven time and time again.
godzilla1077 1 year ago
@danielvincentkelley "disproven my speculation as idle in that you've not merely read it, but replied. "
Wow..theres a non sequitur if I have ever seen one. Your speculation is not idle because I responded. Thats a good one.
"an obvious disinformant."
Ahhh...ad hom and poisoning the well. We are off to a trutherific start!
"Newton's 3rd law of motion "
Wow...too bad its not a closed system welcome to planet Earth
grandmastershek 1 year ago
@grandmastershek watch?v=nUDoGuLpirc There's some of the evidence. Demolition squibs in the video. Pulverized concrete. Thermate in the smoldering wreck. Steel girders thrown 2 football fields from the base of the building and embeded in other buildings. People evacuating the building reporting the base of the building having been demolished BEFORE the collapse when they passed "the lobby" which was also video recorded from New Jersey, a plume of white smoke ascend from the ground floor of WTC.
danielvincentkelley 1 year ago
@danielvincentkelley @danielvincentkelley ""visit ae911truth dott org""
Trust me I love Gage. Best con man out there.Do your own research.
And now lets move tot he typical truther vomit.
"Demolition squibs in the video."
Wow...explosives that are selective about which windows they break. Must be magic!
"Pulverized concrete"
Even Steven Jones says you people are "slow to understand" the concrete was largely not pulverized.
"Thermate... "
Wrong a kook faking peer review says so.
grandmastershek 1 year ago
@danielvincentkelley "Steel girders thrown"...
Do controlled demolitions do that? Ooops...its called kinetic energy. Yeah I know only bombs can do that. But I am glad ae911truth has told you everything you need to know.
" reporting the base of the building having been demolished BEFORE"
Like Wil Rod? They guy who said he heard rumbles on 9/11 then explosions years later? Why don't you give us some direct sources?
grandmastershek 1 year ago
@grandmastershek Controlled demonlitions COULD throw steel girders football fields distance, what matters to it is how much of what quality explosive is used. You attempt to give solidity to hot air. Thermate? Tests PROVE that it is in the dust as was gathered by a whistle blowing clean up worker.
danielvincentkelley 1 year ago
@danielvincentkelley "a plume of white smoke ascend from the ground floor of WTC"
Wow! Someone could see the ground floor of the building from NJ? Thats amazing that someone could observe such a location through blocks of high rises. Think next time.
grandmastershek 1 year ago
@grandmastershek Smoke rises dumb ass. So yeah, the explosion in the basement of the building, that demolished the lobby of WTC 1, as was reported by the last groups of people and firefighters to evacuate the building, did certainly throw smoke into the air FROM the base of the building, that was seen in a video from New Jersey. 9/11 CONSPIRACY: SMOKE AT BASE OF WTC RIGHT BEFORE COLLAPSE there's the search to see the video.
danielvincentkelley 1 year ago
How's that for idle grandmaster dushiek?
danielvincentkelley 1 year ago
@danielvincentkelley Definitely not idle. Just typical regurgitation of what ae911truth wants you to think.
grandmastershek 1 year ago
@grandmastershek Oh yeah, because a conspiracy of more than 1000 random architects and engineers want to push disinformation so that they can be castigated by society at large, as steered by the Major Media, and suffer career death, reduced earning potential, homelessness and general misery for taking a stance against the powers that be. You might wash that taste of crap out ya mouth that you been regurgitating, all those years of carcasses you chewed to oblivion.
danielvincentkelley 1 year ago
@grandmastershek Where as the side that you're defending, the OFFICIAL version of the mass murderous events of 9/11, has profitted from almost 10 years of warfare, making and selling bombs and depleted uranium bullets and tanks and planes and helicopters and now drones and satellites and plasma rifles... You're an obvious aid to the mass murderous war profiteers, why don't you go now and die your pitiful miserable death before you do yourself any more damage aiding mass murderers.
danielvincentkelley 1 year ago
@grandmastershek It's nice to hear you state that you were obviously blaspheming in calling my comment idle. "Definitely not idle." So then why did you say it king of stealth kindergarten communication, name calling then calling people on their ad hominem attacks on your obviously blaspheming, super dushy and war profitting soon to be the hunted in lieu of your having been the hunter, psychological warring nothingness of anything greatly valuable to humanity...
danielvincentkelley 1 year ago
@gmshrek I know why you said it, because it's just part of the job, blaspheming all day, talking down 9/11 truth from the perspective of a very clever cunning and seemingly reasonable to most fools, agent of disinformation.That shit they told you, bout it being ok to kill people because it's what the strongest dead people all did and because all beings do it, whether they be eating veges or cutting heads off of screaming cows, is undulating shit.It's part of the lie they told you're lieing a$s.
danielvincentkelley 1 year ago
evidently you made a cartoon rendition of the official fairytale so you don't remember what it REALLY LOOKS LIKE... let's compare.. yours.... to this one... shall we? watch?v=nUDoGuLpirc
earthicastar 1 year ago
You gotta love all the comments by all the cult followers of the truthiness movement. The believe some secret black ops goverment conspirators did 9/11 and then are stupid enough to blab about it online so that the government has a record of who to whack.
Do any of you goons actually think about that or do you think your cute little truthiness inspired screen name will protect your identity?
"THEY'RE COMING TO GET YOU BARBRA"
aswtx75 1 year ago
I've read a book called Critical Thinking In Psychology, a chapter about "the seductiveness of grand conspiracies". Interestingly, the book mentions several popular conspiracy theories such as Area 51 and JFK. The idiocy of people assuming 9/11 as an inside job are parallel. The same goes for the Moonlandinghoax. There appears to be a general psychological tendency for people to think that a significant event must have been caused by something similarly major, significant or powerful.
Rob260259 1 year ago
Good music shit video. A downward acceleration of the falling upper block implies a downward net force, which requires that the upward resistive force was less than the weight of the block. Therefore the downward force exerted by the falling block must also have been less than its weight. Since the lower section of the building was designed to support the tower, the reduced force exerted by the falling block was insufficient to crush at the point of most resistance. Simple Physics really.
giptonsilly 1 year ago
Sooo.... you're admitting that the building would fall in free-fall speed without resistance WITHOUT demolition? How is that reality? 47 core columns providing vertical support would have slowed the collapse (given you adhere to the pancake theory).
"Floor-by-floor, they just started popping out. Boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom. It's as if they had planned to take down the building." ~ Eyewitness testimony by firefighters who were there. You choose NOT to believe them?
FreedomLovingAv8r 1 year ago
Haha is this a joke they do look very similer or is it just me? remember in order to pull this off the wtc1,1 and 7 must have been riddled with explosives. Debunkers always forget the many people that felt and heard the bombs, are those fire fighters ect insane? did they not hear bombs? if not what did they hear?
timeaification 1 year ago
This is totally stupid.
You got any brain cells mate? !
fithunglad 1 year ago
@MADE UTHINK~UR A GOD DAMMED IDIOT... the proper way to do A demolition would be to collapse the central [ INNER CORE } FIRST ~ soo THE BUILDING WOULD IMPLODE... look up the word you fucking ass hole { IMPLODE }
~!~
U SPENT ALOT OF TIME MAKING A VIDEO TO SUPPORT A CORRUPT GOVERNMENT & UR A SCUM BAG 4 DOING SO
~!`
AM I CLEAR ON THAT BOY ? I used to build bridges so you can kiss my dick if u think u know more about steel structures than I do...BOY... NEVER MIND, U WOULD LIKE THAT
HoodwinkedbyanAngel 1 year ago
now do this with wtc7 :)
911Brit1 1 year ago 17
@911Brit1 You do realize WTC 7 was damaged due to chunks of the North Tower collapsing on it.
godzilla1077 1 year ago