Added: 4 years ago
From: FreeSpeechCoalition
Views: 622,804
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,942)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I hate our government!

  • The pentagon was bombed simple as that

  • It just makes me sad that still so many people follow the phillosphi that ignorance is bliss. And if you know to much your world view might collapse. They rather be blind and follow then see and decide

  • Oo shit u can c the plane

  • If you look in the back ground you can see the

    Plane

  • @timisaboss you think you see a plane.....whatever

  • @timisaboss LOL do you work for the government or are you just blind? There´s nothing there except for an explosion.

  • so if this was a missile how could it take out 5 lamp polls with out exploding just wondering?

  • @kawasakikx250ff because it was like a 20,000 pound russian missile, designed to take out battle ships. fired some 400 , 500 miles away. or something. look up dimitri khalezov wtc nuclear demolition. it will blow your mind.

  • @kawasakikx250ff fabricated evidence. Like with the whole official story..

  • loooool if there was a plane why would they hide the tapes theyd want to show them to encourage their phony wars on terrorism

  • People will believe ANYTHING. The bible is a good example.

  • why is there a square boxy looking thing on top of the pentagon, moving from left to right?

  • So where is the rest of the start of the video. Only 1 second more of footage would have shown something as massive as a plane. Where is that second? Remember they didn't see it coming or could never have imagined that sort of attack, but the FBI managed to pick up 80 tapes in no time flat. Now that must have been well coordinated.

  • Do a search on "911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77" and you'll find the proof you need that shows a plane DID, yes DID hit the pentagon. You won't doubt again.

  • The plane landed into the pentagon. It was at ground level almost 400 yards before it hit. It knocked down lamp posts that were 40 feet a part (the wings did this). A plane hit the pentagon people. Terrorists are evil.

  • @hollygriessmann Evil lives in the White House.

  • How can u live in the States ??? The government is the MAFIA !!!

  • that was a missile

  • Let me understand something, so this is how the government conspiracy worked- take four actual passenger aircrafts, pretend to hijack them, make them disappear off the face of the planet-and in their place,"pretend" to crash four planes in four seperate locations?? Why would you fake-crash something you actually have control of? why hijack planes only to NOT use them in a terrorist attack set-up? where did the actual planes go?

  • Americans are Sheeple

  • Well maybe he upgraded his colts and got the mustang and sallies and shot the pentagon thief. lol

  • LMAO C.I.A./NWO Fail

  • 9/11 was an inside job for about 70 reasons, 1 reason alone can be considered coincidence, 2 is suspicious, 3 is? inside job, 4 is a blatant inside job, but 70??? conspiracies happen, this was one of them, mass murder for personal gain! Oil, opium and bases in the middle east, better to take from the weak before other superpowers (russia, china) do! We may benefit in the long run when we fill up our cars, but it doesn't make 9.11 ok! Mass murder! the shills will attack me but i don't care!

  • why the fuck do they have NBA stats below showing evidence of the crime of the decade.

  • No, wrong. You can see the wing marks in the pentagon.

    Ron Paul!!!!!

  • Cont.> The video I saw before had some amazing claims attached to it. I didn't see everything he was pointing out, but he isolates the path across the sky. I don't have the capabilities but if someone tried to do that working backward from the impact, maybe you can see it here. But I saw the other version and there is more to it than this. This is definitely cropped. The other version shows much more to the right. I wish I could find it again.

  • There is another version of this film out there. It is of a wider angle. This is a cropped version of the original. There was a guy that analyzed it by speeding it up, I think, 30 times. That version is wider to the right. There is a highway interchange more to the right. The guy claimed that by speeding it up you could track a missile's path across the screen. It is interesting. There is definitely something there only visible sped up. I haven't been able to find it for years now.

  • You can show a full color camera film of a Missile hitting the Pentagon and American's still wont believe it but go with the Govt cover up, whatever

  • @TheZen200 You are absolutely right.

  • @TheZen200 pretty much

    

  • @TheZen200 yeah the dumb yanks make me sick!

  • Wait if thats the pentagon, then why is there vehicles driving above it??

  • 911 was the beginning of the Talmudist dream come true:

    to destroy the Christian world through sin

    white supremacy is the lure

    the egotistical need by Europe and the US to erase all the scientific and math advances of arabs

    this is why the US Britain and Israel will nuke Iran

    this also explains why GOP candidates get shoddier and shoddier. they're the ones on the "christian" bullhorn

    what better way to piss all over the faith than with those faces representing us?

  • @sonbarably YOU ARE A CRAZY SON

  • Oh yea,, Probably the most secure building in the world would have cameras everywhere. Yet no footage anywhere of a plane.

  • There was no wrekage,, there was a Circle shaped hole in the pentagon. The roof caved in later. This would be the first wreck in history to completely disintigrate the plane. After all jet engines are made to withstand burning jet fuel, so there should at least be some remnants of them. But they were missing too. Not to mention Building 7 was the first steal structure in history to colapse from a fire.

  • @Crowenan No WTC 1 and 2 was the first steel structures to collapse due to fire.

    The planes according to NIST was not the cause.

    It´s all bullshit propaganda, they were controlled demos, anyone with half a brain would realise that.

  • The video shows no cruise missle either

  • Of course she saw no plane. How could she? It mostly disintegrated, hundreds of witnesses saw the plane hit. How can you ignore all of that and expect someone working in the building, in shock, who weren't looking out the window to see anything? Grow up. I love a good conspiracy theory, This one is idiocy.

  • The engines literally disintegrated, except for one that managed to bounce off the steel reinforced concrete. That was not your average structure. There are ample pictures of the whole thing. I will try to post a link. The plane was witnessed by a great many people and it came in so low that it clipped a light pole going over the interstate. There is NO doubt whatsoever that it was an aircraft. There are photos of landing gear wreckage that are easily identifiable.

  • EMPLOYEES at the Pentagon,.....say they SAW NO PLANE.

    One employee crawled out through THE SMOKING HOLE,......and has stated,.....SHE SAW NO PLANE.

  • Fucking idiots you can see something flying into the building from the other side of the Pentagon. This Serveliance video is across on opposite Side of where the Pentagon was hit.

    With that being said, 9-11 was an inside job..

  • Do a word search for 9/11 Pentagon Crash witnesses. There is a web page with witness accounts from dozens of people who saw it and links to photographs of plane wreckage. YouTube will not allow me to post a direct link so you will have to do a tiny bit of work for yourselves, something you retards aren't likely to do or you would already know about it.

  • Im Afraid the world is going to have to come to terms with the fact 9/11 was a false flag terrorism operation. They did it to escalate the Vietnam war. It worked then and it has worked again. They got the war they wanted. Coincidentally Osama bin Laden got the war he wanted. You dont start wars to fight terrorism. That is falling into their trap and is exactly what they want. For any doubters that this is false flag study the USS LIBERTY then you will understand what they are capable of.

  • I don't see what you are talking about at :09. It is low resolution, black and white video, the kind you saw in most businesses in 2001. You can't expect to get anything out of it and there are enough people who saw an airplane to dispel any wild rumors. It went over an interstate low, lots of eyewitnesses saw an airplane.

  • Pause at :09, what is that?

  • So, that particular camera is slower and missed that .05 second.

  • You need to get some manners, asshole. No conspiracy here. In ten years there hasn't been anything like new evidence. All you clowns have is the original stuff that has been thoroughly debunked. You don't understand how the air traffic control system works and don't have any clue as to how impossible it would be to wire both WTC buildings for explosives. The beams have to be exposed for demolition. Wires would be running everywhere. And the planes and burning fuel would mess all that up.

  • @RHO1953 Nothing has debunked. There are only claims, assumptions and theories against claims, assumptions and theories. Have been over 10 years. If there would be proofs the debate would be over.

  • @RHO1953 you obviously have no idea how a controlled demolition can be engineered.

  • What 70 confiscated videos? I have never heard that particular conspiracy rant. There is nothing being withheld. Only an idiot can twist himself into the knots required to believe a conspiracy as big as the one you believe.

  • @RHO1953 you need to do your research jackass. I was once like you, naive and kinda stupid. But after tons of research, not only on 911 but also on the whole false flag issue, i joined the vastly growing supporters of a conspiracy of some level. One thing i would bet both my nuts on is this: at the very least, they knew about it and let it happen.

  • @RHO1953 Every video of any security camera pointing at the Pentagon on 9/11 was confiscated by the FBI, it's not a fucking consipracy dude, it's the truth. Do some research and stop believing everything your government tells you. In the words of George Carlin, THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT YOU.

  • topickyournose, or whatever you call yourself, you are an imbecile and I am being kind. Go back to your mosque. By the way, I use pages from the Quran as toilet paper.

  • srry, when the cars on the road move 20 feet per a frame, do u think a plane, going 10 times as fast is going to be seen???

  • @obi1nekinobi then why conviscate the video then? duh.

  • Every one of your conspiracy theories requires suspension of common sense and a total belief that thousands of witnesses and thousands of pieces of evidence are ALL fabricated. There WERE remains in the Pentagon crash. DNA matching done by labs other than the government identified many victims positively. You are alleging a conspiracy that would involve tens of thousands of people. Impossible.

  • @RHO1953 dont let your fear get in the way of thinking and staying open to information

  • @RHO1953 You're a fucking retard. No fucking shit they're gonna try mask it up by showing some evidence that it was real, on a scale so big they'd do anything to cover it up, even murder, which they did. Dont even try to defend your 'country' everyone now knows America is the real terrorist. Soon everyone of you will be burned alive while us humans get to live in peace.

  • The only restricted airspace in 2001 was around the WH. Lots of people saw the plane. The wreckage is clearly a plane. Of all the 9/11 stupid conspiracy crap, the Pentagon one is the dumbest. Why is it that you can't understand that the frame rate of a cheap surveillance camera can't give you a clear picture of a plane going over 400 mph? Did you not graduate from HS?

  • @RHO1953 then why don't they release the 70 plus videos of this plane and prove us to be stupid

  • There is a reason all the footage is crap, the rest was confiscated. Seats, luggage, people, A PLANE!............and we get a few bits of painted aluminuim as proof? It's been 10 years and people are still arguing over this farce? No plane, no evidence, no clear footage, no remains...nothing! Just take their word for it.

  • No surprise to me considering it wasn't a plane..!

  • I saw the plane, wth are they talking about? you can clearly see it

  • Everyone else? No, just a few conspiracy kooks. I have seen the photos of the plane wreckage, and you can easily find it. Thousands of eyewitnesses saw the plane, the photos show the wreckage of a plane. I have no problem with believing in a government conspiracy where there is evidence. There just isn't any here.

  • @RHO1953 I agree,

  • Comment removed

  • THERE WAS NO PLANE AT THE PENTAGON.

  • @howyoudoinralph then why was there plane debris everywhere.. why were there engines and wheels and landing gear in the rubble.. and on the lawn..

  • @xjustin523x cuhz dey fuqkinq put it der so dey can fuqkinq scare uhz

  • @anqelbabyy1 i sure hope your kidding.. and that spelling.. god i sure hope your just mocking them

  • @xjustin523x Dude, Where was the Engines and wheeles you speak of? THERE WAS NO SAID DEBRIS LIKE THAT AT HE SO CALLED CRASH SITE! NOTHING AND THATS WHY PEOPLE FREAKED OUT!!!!!

  • @howyoudoinralph I AGREE !!!!

  • @howyoudoinralph so the passengers on that flight- including the wife of one of President Bush's closest friends- they just...vanished into thin air?? WHY FAKE-CRASH AN AIRPLANE??

  • @howyoudoinralph Wow... yet another mystery solved by captain obvious!

  • The plane went through reinforced concrete. The wings sheared off instantly, the tube penetrated into the structure and burned. I have seen photos of the wreckage. It was an airplane, no doubt about it. You guys aren't even aware that with the transponder shut down the plane won't show on air traffic radar. You want to believe so bd that you defy logic and common sense.

  • @RHO1953 If the wings sheered off instantly, then where are the wings? Or marks upon the pentagon with which the wings struck? Common sense anyone? I'd like to see those photo's. I would like to say its puzzling that you would agree with the "official" story considering no video proof. Certainly the video they released is not proof. You would think, with common sense, the Pentagon would be loaded with great quality cameras. Considering its the defense department of the USA>

  • @RHO1953 hahaha show us these pics of the airplane, if the wings sheared off then where did they go? mike walters said they 'folded back', bbc and cnn say they sliced through the wall, others say they hit the ground, others say they 'vaporised', which is it shill? why are you right and everyone else is wrong??? jeeez cointelpro only get what they pay for i guess?? you shills/trolls/disinfo (STDs) are fucking hilarious, i love it!!

  • @RHO1953 Yeah, cool story. It's flawed to fuck though.

  • @RHO1953 "The plane went through reinforced concrete. The wings sheared off instantly, the tube penetrated into the structure and burned"

    Firstly, THE most dense parts of the 'plane by far are the engines. There is NO WAY at impact even as slow 100 mph (below flying speed) that anything is going to redirect or pull their mass towards the fuselage with "wing fold".

    Secondly - the parts most likely to penetrate concrete? The engines and wings (due to density/fuel weight), not the fuselage.

  • Collect some plane crash vids and notice how the planes blow up. Then compare it to explosion at the Pentagon. They look different. (b4 u calling me with names note that Im not conspiracy theorist nor debunker. Just impartially curious)

  • No, we couldn't shoot down an airliner. There was no authority to do it, and even if we could, we couldn't find it because the transponder was shut off which makes it invisible to air traffic. You don't use common sense and you don't bother to educate yourself about the reality.

  • @RHO1953 If you approach the airspace above Washington, you need to punch in a code to avoid getting blasted out the sky, it's a no-fly zone. Otherwise surface to air missiles are launched.

  • Lol people think fuselage burns for a couple hours and is put out by firefighters. God man...you fucking realize that flight was destined to fly to fucking Los Angeles? You know how much fuel was STILL in the plane? That entire beautiful green lawn should have been incinerated. It ALSO should have been deemed a hazardous zone and NONE of those civilians should have been allowed close to the site. How does that not strike anyone as odd? It's an honest observation...

  • @infections people don't comprehend the truth when we are fed lies for breakfast lunch and dinner.

  • In 2001 we didn't have the capability of shooting down civilian aircraft, and you don't understand how the radar system works. If the transponder is shut off, and it was shut off on all the hijacked planes, the planes don't show up on the civilian air traffic control radars. The military radars don't cover the interior of the US. Do some basic research and you will understand. It isn't what you think at all and it isn't mysterious or suspicious.

  • @RHO1953 lol u funny

  • @RHO1953 What ? Of course we had the capability to shoot down a civilian aircraft in 2001.In the six months prior to 9/11 fighter jets were scrambled 64 times because civilian aircraft controllers lost contact with the flights.It was protocol.How many were scrambled on 9/11?Satellites replaced NORADs Radar sites long before 9/11 but at every site there is STILL an FAA radar installation.

  • @RHO1953 U havent done ur reasearch about the defence of US and what the protocol includes. Study it first and study it good, then study the timeline of the WTC incident without dropping off anything. There are enough unusual happenings around the WTC incident to make u exhaust, so for some ppl it's easier to deny everything. Some ppl seem to be very afraid about what one thing. "What if".

  • @Scumbot404 What utter shit.

  • @BatmansArse STFU and swallow.

  • @Scumbot404 Now that IS original! Bravo, sausage boy!

  • @BatmansArse As original as the batmans arse, unintelligentsia treehugger.

  • @RHO1953 you are clearly cointelpro!! please tell us all what happened to the wings/engines/tail again!! please tell me why your own 'official eyewitnesses' all contradict each other massively, please tell us all why no camera caught this huge airliner flying low over a crowded city at rush hour? why did d. rumsfeld, charlie lewis and tim roemer say 'missile'? please provide us all with a list of the dead, and how we can verify these 'eyewitnesses' for ourselves?? thanks

  • @RHO1953 U mad bro? you have commented like 11 times chill your self.

  • @DoWieFX dude 'rho' is a known shill, hes paid by 'cointelpro', google them, see what they are about! of course 9/11 was an inside job, the shills/trolls/disinfo (STDs) are here to try and 'sway your opinion' of world events like 9/11! 'rho' isnt in denial, he knows a swell as everyone else that 9/11 was an inside job

  • You guys want to believe a conspiracy so badly that you ignore facts and common sense. In 2001 we didn't have cell phones with cameras and HD digital cameras being carried around commonly. Thousands of people witnessed the plane. Some of them are fuzzy on the details of the plane, but police will tell you that witnesses are notoriously unreliable. I coach wrestling and when I look at tape of matches I am always surprised that my memory of what happened is different than what shows on the tape.

  • @RHO1953

    "Thousands" witnessed the plane? Where are you getting this information from, what source please. Thanks in advance.

  • In 2001 NOBODY had high quality video surveillance recorders. We didn't have the technology then. Now everyone does, but still lots of places just want the minimum. That was state of the art then. All they want is to be able to identify the face of a robber, it doesn't require high resolution which in 2001 was impossible. The frame rate is slow to save tape. It is just common sense and it is widely known. No mystery, no conspiracy. Plane going to too fast to show up clearly. End of story.

  • @RHO1953 right...except that all the tapes were "confiscated by the FBI". only the ones that didnt refute the official story were allowed to be released. not too many, yeah? there should have been dozens..maybe HUNDREDS of videos from stores, atm's, etc...

  • there's a running bus above your pentagon.

  • It is right next to a major four lane highway. There isn't really anywhere to get a vantage point on the side of the impact. It is also one of the most secure buildings in the country. If you are standing around there with a camera you will draw some unwanted attention.

  • @RHO1953 no you'd get stopped immediately and detained for questioning while they run a NICS on you, scary shit

  • One of the biggest tourist destinations in America, with all those monuments, and you're telling me NOBODY, no tourists, NOBODY got any video of a low-flying jet?

  • Don't be dumb. The frame rate on a surveillance camera is too slow to catch the plane. It went through the field of view between frames. Nothing sinister, only your own stupidity. There are thousands of live witnesses that saw the plane.

  • @RHO1953 My brother was working in Alexandria, minutes away to the south. He saw it but had no idea... Must not have been extremely low at that time, but low enough for my bro to, in hindsight, think it odd....

  • @RHO1953 Tell me why would a hotel right next to the PENTAGON have a shitty camera? not to mention there's no debris or pictures of debris of an engine or a broken tail section... and there would have been a larger fireball and smoke cloud from the instantaneous burning of a shit load of jet fuel..... also why wasn't it shot down before even crossing into the wrong airspace?

  • I see the airplane

  • I can't see why they don't release every piece of footage they have, as security concerns seem trivial in these days of google earth and streetview. ??? Why not?

  • 0:10 You can see a flash that looks like the tail section of a plane reflecting in the sun. Which would make sense as the sun seems to be coming in from the right of the picture. (the reflection of objects closer to camera. (signs etc.)) It suggests a plane.

  • the reason it doesnt show a plane is because there was no plane. why would they not release footage of a plane if they had it to shut up all those conspiracy theorists

  • @SuperBildo420

    It doesn't show the airplane because the frame rate is super slow on surveillance cameras, look at the cars, they're caught on a couple of frames and are only doing 40 mph or less. The jet going 10X faster simply wasn't caught on an individual frame.

    Debunking 911 claims is too easy.

  • People say that 9/11 was an inside job. So lets look at the evidence. No plane+explosion at pentagon+inside job=explosives

  • sorry we know that it was a sucide bomer that drove up then blowed up.

  • ...I lived across the from the Mall from this location... the Mall and this Hotel have several cameras pointed towards the general direction of the Pentagon... ...so why do we only have one official video..? anyone that believes that a JET hit the building needs their head examined... ...they have done a good job of hiding the truth, but not the lies.

  • so what are we seeing here people?? PROOF THAT 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!

  • We need a hacker to find out who the people are who voted down this video. They are the decivers and the terorrist.

  • erm, you can clearly see the top of the tail of the plane lol! Look carefully! It is a plane

  • Comment removed

  • If the government didn't want anybody to see this, then they would have removed this video already. Just STFU truthers. Go sniff some chemtrails.

  • @MazJax Uhm its in our constitutional rights to receive information from our government. Forget what amendment it is but thats the reason why we where allowed to see the ONE video shot from the pentagon. If it was a plane it sure as hell wasn't a airliner.

  • @zachyboy13528 Then why did 130 rush hour drivers report seeing an AIRLINER?

    Face it, if there were no cameras pointed at the WTC, then you'd say no planes hit the towers. You'd ignore EVERY plane eyewitness, and the plane debris present, like you do for the pentagon.

    If the FBI really had something to hide, then they would have removed EVERY LAST video of the pentagon crash.

  • @MazJax Uhm no they wouldn't have that would have been a deliberate violation of our constitutional rights. If the FBI really didn't have anything to hide why not release the other 84 CCTV camera angles that are pointed at the pentagon 24/7? Hmmm? Yeah cuz its not hard for a government to produce provocateurs right? Its not like we used them in the 70s against Iran. right? You are an idiot, have you not seen the eye witness videos from the WTC? all the firemen, police officers, and news reporter

  • @MazJax s saying over and over "there is a secondary device, we need to evacuate the premises" Do i need to send you the video link? I'm sure you don't remember the conference held the day before 9/11. Herp derp thinks the department of defense only has 1 camera angle.

  • I see all the dots connecting...from the Kennedy assassination to the bombings. Everything has been fabricated to make a new world order....

  • God thank you!! At least the comments I see here are from people who can clearly see the government is involved in it!

  • Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job

  • @JoanBeatrington001

    hey i take offense to be being called a goyim i acutally know the meaning so joking or not fuck off.

  • cba with conspiracy theories anymore, i just CBA, ill let the rest of the world save the planet, im bored now

  • @spoada you say the plane just zipped through the frames but as the explosion happens you see cars driving by at high speeds with no delay in the cameras shot. Nice try bud

  • @YourMachineMusic what are you talking about?! i watched exactly that and did not see constant traffic flow but a jump.

  • Comment removed

  • @YourMachineMusic Pause at 0.09, you can see the FIN of the plane right there, it clearly is a tail FIN moving left to right for a few frames in the footage, end of

  • Guess what folks I have tried to respond several times to posts with a few facts about Jewish American politicians & their allegiances to foreign countries damn thing won't load how strange nothing inflammatory just mentions which organizations they belong to. Well call me Alice I think I just fell down the hole.

  • thats because it wasnt a plane .. never was a plane

  • Maaan da uS givz two shits about u.theres always another to replace da other

  • plane could have dove straight in between frames. That camera did not apear to have a good frame rate. It was probly old and put in when the hotel was built. I say no conspiracy, just bad crop and low frame rate. It simply missed the plane between frames!

  • @spoada fair enough, so your saying no camera caught this huge plane flying low over a busy city at rush hour???

  • @wellifthemediasaysit Apparently all the cameras around the Pentagon & all its air defenses there since the cold war were turned off. Not only did no camera see it no eye witnesses saw the thing skimming the ground either. You only have to fit an aircraft transponder to make Air Traffic think there is an aircraft. Most ATC is recorded as well in case of accident or incident.

  • @TheTabellarius exactly, a huge plane flies low over a busy city at rush hour and no camera ses it, it leaves virtually no damage, no debris, no bodies, just 2 faked phone calls and a few paid shills desperately pointing us all to the contradictory made up eyewitnesses!! you just couldnt make it up could you?

  • electoral system, our vote does not really matter at all. sorry mate, we yanks are fuggered!

  • 9/11 was an inside job

  • the person on the left didn't look until after the explosion leaving me to believe he was following no "low plane" with his vision and was only surprised by the ending boom leaving me to believe there was no plane.

  • @Porkchoppa76 your attempt at a cutdown confirms you believe in whatever the conspriacy hippies tell you...Elvis and I just played golf, if you want an autograph, just let me know.

  • The pentagon most protected building in the world with high security and hundreds of camera's..and not one single camera capturing the drama....You got to be kidding me!..its obviuos the goverment is hiding something

  • The thing I don't understand is if you say a missile hit the Pentagon, then where did American Flight 77 go? I mean the same flight takes off daily and lands daily, but it just so happened to takeoff on the 11th and vanish with all the people on board and the pilots too? The air traffic control recordings aren't fake because there are tons of people with scanners that feed into websites that archive that stuff as well as flight tracking programs open to the public. IDK but whatever.

  • @Nintenkid91 It is easy to fake people addresses etc particularly if you are using your own agents (True believers). Conveniently there are no survivors from this event. When the US shot down an Iranian passenger jet it was a mistake. Crew have now told they were made to leave the combat room six remained to shoot it down. Clearly thought a high value target on board. Which Middle East country beginning with I do you think would like to see America at war with Iran & gave Intel

  • you conspiracy people are morons....You probably also believe in loch-ness monster, bigfoot, and Elvis still being alive.

  • @76reliant I'd like a photo if you have one :)

  • there was no plane, it was cruise missile with plane markings on it, no doubt about it-- ONE OF THE BIGGEST STAGED ACTS EVER, so very obvious