Again, more with your vote-trip. It was not a vote, and it never was; it was a petition brought to Court of Justice per the Marihuana Guild Charter section VI as posted below.
You were at best an amicus curiae of sorts---that is, a friend of the court giving your view of the Petition. Not a voter.
Note that s. VI does not say upon whose petition; anyone could petition the Court to annex a Calendar, and it would then be up to the Guild's members to make use thereof or not.
All in all, Mr. Boyer's view was considered, and the presiding officer of Court of Justice was indeed going to introduce a clause to the Calendar requiring certificates of analysis; however, the Guild's Clerk excepted to that, and, as no one protested his exception, the clause was altered to require qualitative testing by the Clerk and quantitative testing evidenced by certificate as soon as practicable, which was agreeable to all present in the face of the Court.
As for verbal abuse, that is one way to look at it; another way to look at it is that a court hearing is a battle; you abandoned your position upon the field and therefore showed that you had no interest in defending your position.
It was certainly unparliamentary behaviour, but, well, the exigency of the situation causes, somewhat reasonably, high emotionality in various parties; Bud has issues with emotional control, but we forgive our brothers, no?
The hearing was held per the Marihuana guild charter s. VI, to wit: "Upon petition, Court of Justice may annex Calendars unto this Act listing an additional substance or substances to be treated in a manner similar to marihuana under this Act or as specified within the annexed Calendars."
No vote. No one ever said it was a vote. That's your own trip, Marc, just as most of your stuff is---and you agreed in principle, anyway; you merely quibbled over price---six months = OK; today = not OK?
Awesome Rant, I totally agree, even though I may never do LSD or Ectasy nor may I agree with them, thats only my opinion and I STRONGLY believe that everyone should have their own opinions and their own choice as to weather or not they want to do those drugs. What the Marijuana Guild is doing is great for the community in terms of safety and freedom of appetite, you guys have my full support :-)
i was told to go to this society's meeting as a member to voice my opinion and vote.. turns out bud changes the rules - the marijuana guild members are the only ones who can vote on this issue [and there's only one member in that guild.
such big changes in a society must pass it thru a quorum of at least 3 members
the video will prove the bud is a dictator and resorts to verbal abuse when opposed
your words here show us you don't understand a thing about the Marijuana guild who petitioned the apendix to the schedule. You don't even understand that you are not, nor have ever been a member of the Marijuana Guild. If you wished to have an influence on the rules, you would have had to step up and join. No one can come and try to hijack a private meeting by assuming rules they think will go well. No one invited invited you to change rules unilaterally. I am a dictator>no one joined the Guild
It's absolutely amazing bud. No other freeman has done such a great thing (AFAIK). People always complain "where's the proof"; I send them straight to your channel. :-)
Where did you learn about freeman stuff?
I want to make a start at learning, but there's many different methods people use; I think some of them are wrong. I want to learn the same method as you.
I began with Robert Menard's invaluable videos. The true secret is that it requires determination and and lot of work to assert it, though. This alos requires the willingness to endure jail time rather than knuckle under injustice. You really have to know what you are doing and stick to it. I know this for sure: If they arrest me now, then Canadians don't live in a democracy under rule of law. It's hard to climb on the massive armor of the Government like that Chinese guy did a few years back
MARC BOYER MAKES SENSE WHEN HE TALKS
blingmow101 2 years ago
Hi Bud
poepflater 2 years ago
Rob Nicolson is fast asleep tucked in under the covers having a sweet dreams about licking my ball-sack right now.
webovisionca 2 years ago
First ..i want you to get MAD!!
I am mad as hell and i won't take anymore!!
SolTheImmoralFire 2 years ago
"it's ignorant to not have a quorum of members vote such a change into any society"
It is not a change; it is exactly what section VI of the Guild Charter was intended to facilitate.
scirefacias 2 years ago
Again, more with your vote-trip. It was not a vote, and it never was; it was a petition brought to Court of Justice per the Marihuana Guild Charter section VI as posted below.
You were at best an amicus curiae of sorts---that is, a friend of the court giving your view of the Petition. Not a voter.
Note that s. VI does not say upon whose petition; anyone could petition the Court to annex a Calendar, and it would then be up to the Guild's members to make use thereof or not.
scirefacias 2 years ago
So, to sum up, Bud did not change the rules; you were ignorant of the rules. Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
scirefacias 2 years ago
it's ignorant to not have a quorum of members vote such a change into any society
the ignorance is with Bud's desire to rule without checks or balance that a society's structure has built into it
increationwetrust 2 years ago
All in all, Mr. Boyer's view was considered, and the presiding officer of Court of Justice was indeed going to introduce a clause to the Calendar requiring certificates of analysis; however, the Guild's Clerk excepted to that, and, as no one protested his exception, the clause was altered to require qualitative testing by the Clerk and quantitative testing evidenced by certificate as soon as practicable, which was agreeable to all present in the face of the Court.
scirefacias 2 years ago
As for verbal abuse, that is one way to look at it; another way to look at it is that a court hearing is a battle; you abandoned your position upon the field and therefore showed that you had no interest in defending your position.
It was certainly unparliamentary behaviour, but, well, the exigency of the situation causes, somewhat reasonably, high emotionality in various parties; Bud has issues with emotional control, but we forgive our brothers, no?
scirefacias 2 years ago
The hearing was held per the Marihuana guild charter s. VI, to wit: "Upon petition, Court of Justice may annex Calendars unto this Act listing an additional substance or substances to be treated in a manner similar to marihuana under this Act or as specified within the annexed Calendars."
No vote. No one ever said it was a vote. That's your own trip, Marc, just as most of your stuff is---and you agreed in principle, anyway; you merely quibbled over price---six months = OK; today = not OK?
scirefacias 2 years ago
Awesome Rant, I totally agree, even though I may never do LSD or Ectasy nor may I agree with them, thats only my opinion and I STRONGLY believe that everyone should have their own opinions and their own choice as to weather or not they want to do those drugs. What the Marijuana Guild is doing is great for the community in terms of safety and freedom of appetite, you guys have my full support :-)
malkirah 2 years ago
i was told to go to this society's meeting as a member to voice my opinion and vote.. turns out bud changes the rules - the marijuana guild members are the only ones who can vote on this issue [and there's only one member in that guild.
such big changes in a society must pass it thru a quorum of at least 3 members
the video will prove the bud is a dictator and resorts to verbal abuse when opposed
increationwetrust 2 years ago
your words here show us you don't understand a thing about the Marijuana guild who petitioned the apendix to the schedule. You don't even understand that you are not, nor have ever been a member of the Marijuana Guild. If you wished to have an influence on the rules, you would have had to step up and join. No one can come and try to hijack a private meeting by assuming rules they think will go well. No one invited invited you to change rules unilaterally. I am a dictator>no one joined the Guild
budoracle 2 years ago
You're right: I don't stand-under the guild because there's a lose cannon as its dictator
- a society by definition cannot pass anything on the vote of one guild member.
- if the guild cannot form a quorum then it's to the members to vote in a new provision in because this change really does affects the membership
increationwetrust 2 years ago
I am not the one who spent the last 1/4 year in jail under a mental order
budoracle 2 years ago
It's absolutely amazing bud. No other freeman has done such a great thing (AFAIK). People always complain "where's the proof"; I send them straight to your channel. :-)
Where did you learn about freeman stuff?
I want to make a start at learning, but there's many different methods people use; I think some of them are wrong. I want to learn the same method as you.
NotMarkk 2 years ago
I began with Robert Menard's invaluable videos. The true secret is that it requires determination and and lot of work to assert it, though. This alos requires the willingness to endure jail time rather than knuckle under injustice. You really have to know what you are doing and stick to it. I know this for sure: If they arrest me now, then Canadians don't live in a democracy under rule of law. It's hard to climb on the massive armor of the Government like that Chinese guy did a few years back
budoracle 2 years ago
Thanks for your words bud!
I am going to start tonight. :-D
NotMarkk 2 years ago
agree bud people can make thier own decisions
keep up the good work
m321w 2 years ago
Someone go to the store and get some for me! hahah
SooperPanda 2 years ago
Good rant. I wish I had the supplies to sell that stuff here in Halifax. I'd finally put in my freeman papers and make a living :D
Fliping187 2 years ago 8
I will supply DMT for you :-)
NotMarkk 2 years ago
Seriously...
NotMarkk 2 years ago