Energy sources without the need for fuel or energy input exist ,But some very powerfull ppl don't want you and me to be free from energy costs,Get a real free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
"HHO" is a HHOax. These silly things take more energy from the crankshaft than they return. They will REDUCE fuel economy, but will NEVER increase it! Not unless you can find a 100% efficient alternator belt, 100% efficient alternator, 100% efficient electrolyser and a 100% efficient internal combustion engine, "HHO" systems won't do so much as break even. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics says 'no free lunch!'
I remember being at a library in Florida, where I had to re-design an N reactor so that the isotopes would actually melt away from each other if there was an accident, instead of creating a fiery gateway into the next life for everyone.
As a social order, we are rather on the slow side, I would say, by my estimate of the shekel.
Most scientist I knew could conceive and achieve, understanding thoery and observation through to practical application.
A three story inverted wine glass that pops using salt and phosphoric acid (naval jelly) under water, in a large storage tank. It creates it's own metabolism, of a sort, and it gets real hot water, used in a steam line, just like nuclear, but not as dangerous.
We discussed throwing a small 1/2 lb. chunk of sodium into the river, once. But no one ever took it out of the kerosine. We knew it would and that was enough. Get the picture?
If you stagger each tube a quarter inch, every other tube, so that each one faces the opposite charge, you'll have it. But you really need the cars to plug into the house current supplied by a municipal water piston (dangerous, requiring safety codes and such.)
I see your videos are in an area I'm working in. I made
contact with you because I'd like to give you some money
for placing my link in your video description.
Call me to discuss it if you are interested 949-945-5417.
hyfusiondotcom 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Energy sources without the need for fuel or energy input exist ,But some very powerfull ppl don't want you and me to be free from energy costs,Get a real free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
rebelliouseoagj 1 year ago
poor
hydrobomb23 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"HHO" is a HHOax. These silly things take more energy from the crankshaft than they return. They will REDUCE fuel economy, but will NEVER increase it! Not unless you can find a 100% efficient alternator belt, 100% efficient alternator, 100% efficient electrolyser and a 100% efficient internal combustion engine, "HHO" systems won't do so much as break even. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics says 'no free lunch!'
revolxaohemwolb 2 years ago
piss
dronesong 2 years ago
I remember being at a library in Florida, where I had to re-design an N reactor so that the isotopes would actually melt away from each other if there was an accident, instead of creating a fiery gateway into the next life for everyone.
As a social order, we are rather on the slow side, I would say, by my estimate of the shekel.
Most scientist I knew could conceive and achieve, understanding thoery and observation through to practical application.
Crypto7Jocko0 3 years ago
Water burns, but...
Have you ever seen sodium hit water? It isn't just a snapping gas.
Crypto7Jocko0 3 years ago
Yes i have, 2mm^3 of sodium right out the oil jar can sure put on a show.
MinTrinidad 3 years ago
A three story inverted wine glass that pops using salt and phosphoric acid (naval jelly) under water, in a large storage tank. It creates it's own metabolism, of a sort, and it gets real hot water, used in a steam line, just like nuclear, but not as dangerous.
Crypto7Jocko0 3 years ago
got any pictures of links for this? Would love to see it.
MinTrinidad 3 years ago
You've got mail... pix.
We discussed throwing a small 1/2 lb. chunk of sodium into the river, once. But no one ever took it out of the kerosine. We knew it would and that was enough. Get the picture?
Crypto7Jocko0 3 years ago
Almost!
If you stagger each tube a quarter inch, every other tube, so that each one faces the opposite charge, you'll have it. But you really need the cars to plug into the house current supplied by a municipal water piston (dangerous, requiring safety codes and such.)
Still safer than nuclear energy.
Crypto7Jocko0 3 years ago
Cool video NICE WORK! Thanks for the response:-)
GREENPOWERSCIENCE 3 years ago
Thank You, would love to see you implement it.
MinTrinidad 3 years ago