waar ik denk dat van rossem gelijk heeft heeft pratt zich uitstekend verweerd tegen zo'n imponerende gesprekspartner als van Rossem. Vrij aanvallend waar van Rossem juist zelf gewend is iedereen aan te vallen.
Ik moet zeggen dat ik wel sympathie heb voor Pratt.Op dit moment is het inderdaad niet nodig om wapens in bezit te hebben, en we zijn er op dit moment veel beter aan toe dan de praktijken die we in de VS zien. Toch zullen tijden veranderen, en dan zullen we wederom machteloos zijn. Ik geef v Rossum overigens wel helemaal gelijk dat we met een bewapende bevolking niks konden inbrengen tegen de Wehrmacht, het leger dat tegen zo'n overtuigende coalitie van naties stand hield.Belachelijke gedachte
Van Gogh would have never survived even if he was carrying an AA12. He got shot from behind while he was paying attention to the road he was riding his bike to work on. Even his incredible fat layers couldn't slow down the bullets enough.
Also, the Germans attacked Holland with a blitzkrieg of trained soldiers with automatic weapons, sniper rifles, tanks, and air attacks on Rotterdam. You don't thwart that by giving a bunch of farmers hunting rifles and letting them sort it out from there.
Van Gogh would have never survived even if he was carrying an AA12. He got shot from behind while he was paying attention to the road he was riding his bike to work on. Even his incredible fat layers couldn't slow down the bullets enough.
Also, the Germans attacked Holland with a blitzkrieg of trained soldiers with automatic weapons, sniper rifles, tanks, and air attacks on Rotterdam. You don't thwart that by giving a bunch of farmers hunting rifles and letting them sort it out from there.
Pratt gives examples of people protecting themselves against other governments. Yet for the USA it's almost impossible to be attacked by another government; their government will protect them from invasion. And what good does having guns do when most of the people who have guns use them against other civilians (rioters; criminals)... Does that improve security?
If a government really wants to attack its citizens with the army, the citizens will loose; especially in the case of the US army..
Ever heard of black Irony? This guy OWNS it. We Dutch like it a lot. Just as we enjoy a good substantial political discussioen where the opposites parties treat eachother with respect. We can even do it whithout using profanities or namecalling. You should try it sometime. It really enriches your life.
Rossem seems like the kind of person who tries to turn everything around on the person he disagrees with. People like that are assholes plain and simple.
@OzzyFan87 Well if he was that kind of a person (I don't know him personally of course, but I see he's a regular on the shows that I watch) he probably wouldn't have been so easy on Mr. Pratt, I mean the Netherlands haven't had a king in over a 100 years and England wasn't conquered despite their laws about firearms. And those are just things I've noticed without having the profound knowledge of history Mr. van Rossem has (he's a historian).
Als ik alleen aan me zelf zou denken zou ik zeggen natuurlijk wil ik een geweer om me zelf te beschermen maar wil ik ook dat mn buurman er een in zn nachtkastje heeft liggen....
If only those people had guns in the WTC on 9/11. They could have shot at the airplane and stopped those goddamn terrorists. That shit would have never happened in Texas, at least we USE our right to bare arms. Dumb socialistic yuppies in New York.
...is something Pratt could say. What an imbecile! Anyway let those rednecks keep their guns, it speeds up the process of them killing each other. See as a speedy version of Darwin's survival of the fittest. Death of the dumbest.
Hahahahaha wat een sukkel. De Wehrmacht was in die tijd zo geavanceerde, wij liepen nog met mitrailleurs uit de 1ste wereld oorlog terwijl zij met tanks, bommenwerpers en paratroopers binnen kwamen walsen. Volgens mij was het ook niet per se dat we echt overwonnen waren maar omdat duitsland onze steden bombardeerden en we niet nog meer levens en cultuur wouden verspillen voor een oorlog die we nooit zouden winnen.
And btw guns are not the only things that will protect you. You can make firebombs, explosive bombs, slingshots, spears, knifes and lots more just from household articles (atleast partially). This whole idea that you can only be safe with guns is really retarded. I wouldn't feel safe if I just got into an argument with somebody and know that he has a gun at home, how can anybody feel safe when you know everybody, even people who hate you have guns?
Rofl, yeah, the US is full of logic; You should have the right to shoot people when you feel threatened, but smoking something as simple and natural as marihuana without disturbing anyone will put you in prison.
American authorities are full of shit; they do anything to make money. Maybe when they get bombed again they'll stop acting like the rulers of the world.
I'm Dutch, I like van Rossem but I agree with the other guy. People should be allowed to defend themselves with fire arms against not only criminals (since the Dutch police is utterly useless in doing that) and against a possible repressing government.
The Dutch police is terrible? Crime rates are below the eu avarage with a police force only two thirds the avarage.
People are much more likely to kill themselves, their kids or their neighbours (by accident or on purpose) then to save their lives by carying guns. Even when being atacked, robbed, or threatened, weapons are more likely to get you killed then to save you.
The militia vs. government argument is ridicilous. Armed civilians are no thread to a modern army AT ALL.
Jemig, die Pratt heeft echt geen verstand van geschiedenis, alsof wij een koning hadden en als we die al hadden had die al niks over overgave te zeggen. Net doen alsof die blaffertjes V1's, V2's, tanks en vliegtuigbommen hadden tegengehouden. Ja dan hadden we natuurlijk na Rotterdam gezegd dat we pistolen hadden tegen die Duitsers en dat we echt hadden kunnen voorkomen dat Amsterdam en wie weet nog wel andere plaatsen gebombardeerd zouden worden.
Beetje makkelijk om een technisch foutje van de man er zo uit te lichten. Maakt het wat uit welk onderdeel van de regering zich overgaf?
In Frankrijk en Polen en vast veel andere landen waren er partizanen/bewapende verzetsstrijders die een militie vormden tegen de Duitsers en guerilla oorlogsvoering voerden. Dit was in Nederland onmogelijk omdat niemand hier wapens had.
Het idee dat een stelletje hollandse burgers de krijgsmacht die de modernste legers van Europa onder de voet liep tegen had kunnen houden is te belachelijk voor woorden.
Leuk dat je Frankrijk en polen noemt. Beide landen werden onder de voet gelopen. Ondanks het goede werk van partizanen. Ze werden bevrijd door legers. Niet door Partizanen. Begrijp me niet verkeerd, de partizanen deden geweldig werk. Maar het argument is stom.
this guy Van Rossem is an total dumbass! I'm sick and tired that we Americans have to go over to europe and liberate them! if they just arm themselfs and have some balls and fight, we won't have to go over there and kick some ass! but what he fails to see the world bankers want to inslave all of us, to do that they need to disarm the people. they got most of europe because there are weak! now there after the USA and we to are asleep! Thank you Larry for standing for Truth!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I am Dutch, and I totally agree with you that "van rossem" is a media attention craving whore and has totally NO idea what is going on. This guy is what we call a table-intellectual appearing on prime time tv. I do not want his opinions, i do not share his opinions, frankly that dude annoys me A LOT! Dutch ideal and the dutch-system cannot be compared to American values and ideal.
You're quite ignorant.. I'm also Dutch and Maarten van Rossem is definitely not a "media attention craving whore". He gets asked by shows because of his expertise, but most of all because of his pessimistic attitude (which is something many people like, or think it's a sign of intilligence). And about his expertise, the guy is a freaking professor and he graduated history at a university.
@jimorocks"I'm sick and tired that we Americans have to go over to europe and liberate them!" I'm getting so sick and tired that we europeans have to save America every time they make a global financial mess of things.
If it wasn't for europeans, you and youre country wouldn't even exist.
This kind of retoric that you are displaying is retarted. You're an idiot.
middletownDreamz.... In Europe, we defend ourselves with words and arguments. It's historically totally incorrect that holland was able to defend itself against the nazi's, In the Netherlands we have a democracy so we don't have to defend ourselves against the government
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
If half the Jews who perished in the Nazi death camps had had a shotgun in their own homes, there would have been no holocaust. Look at the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. It started with four or five Jews with revolvers and it spread into a wide rebellion.
In Europe, we don't need to defend ourselves. In Europe it's much more safe than in the US. In Holland we have an expression which says 'possibillity produces the thief'.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Then you are fools if you refuse to defend yourselves. Safer in Europe than in America? BULLSHIT. Since Britain enforced its gun ban the crime and murder rate has surpassed that of the United States. Also, the presence of firearms in the hands of American citizens has prevented the rise of a Hitler or a Stalin as it has done in Europe in the 20th century. The next time Holland is invaded and occupied by a foreign power don't beg America to help liberate you.
I dont even think most people in Europe want the right to defend themselves. If their governments turn tyrannical I doubt they would give a shit. I say fuck em. Keep your UN and leave the US alone.
waar ik denk dat van rossem gelijk heeft heeft pratt zich uitstekend verweerd tegen zo'n imponerende gesprekspartner als van Rossem. Vrij aanvallend waar van Rossem juist zelf gewend is iedereen aan te vallen.
casperstap 2 months ago
Ik moet zeggen dat ik wel sympathie heb voor Pratt.Op dit moment is het inderdaad niet nodig om wapens in bezit te hebben, en we zijn er op dit moment veel beter aan toe dan de praktijken die we in de VS zien. Toch zullen tijden veranderen, en dan zullen we wederom machteloos zijn. Ik geef v Rossum overigens wel helemaal gelijk dat we met een bewapende bevolking niks konden inbrengen tegen de Wehrmacht, het leger dat tegen zo'n overtuigende coalitie van naties stand hield.Belachelijke gedachte
roliepo 3 months ago
Van Gogh would have never survived even if he was carrying an AA12. He got shot from behind while he was paying attention to the road he was riding his bike to work on. Even his incredible fat layers couldn't slow down the bullets enough.
Also, the Germans attacked Holland with a blitzkrieg of trained soldiers with automatic weapons, sniper rifles, tanks, and air attacks on Rotterdam. You don't thwart that by giving a bunch of farmers hunting rifles and letting them sort it out from there.
Absurdeling 4 months ago
Van Gogh would have never survived even if he was carrying an AA12. He got shot from behind while he was paying attention to the road he was riding his bike to work on. Even his incredible fat layers couldn't slow down the bullets enough.
Also, the Germans attacked Holland with a blitzkrieg of trained soldiers with automatic weapons, sniper rifles, tanks, and air attacks on Rotterdam. You don't thwart that by giving a bunch of farmers hunting rifles and letting them sort it out from there.
Absurdeling 4 months ago
i laugh about those christian ignorant fucking americans, there is a reason why the whole world hates you assholes
020amsterda020 7 months ago
Pratt gives examples of people protecting themselves against other governments. Yet for the USA it's almost impossible to be attacked by another government; their government will protect them from invasion. And what good does having guns do when most of the people who have guns use them against other civilians (rioters; criminals)... Does that improve security?
If a government really wants to attack its citizens with the army, the citizens will loose; especially in the case of the US army..
fedinhorax 9 months ago
@fedinhorax
US government is already trying to take away are guns man, look up project Fast and furious.
narutocaprirequest2 6 months ago
Our last king died in 1890. Learn your history Mr Pratt. And more importantly, learn to think more realistically.
JulesTMNT 10 months ago
Comment removed
JulesTMNT 10 months ago
You keep youre firearms and your school shoot outs we keep our soft drugs and whores...thank you very much bye bye dag dag
Ben1987X 11 months ago
Ever heard of black Irony? This guy OWNS it. We Dutch like it a lot. Just as we enjoy a good substantial political discussioen where the opposites parties treat eachother with respect. We can even do it whithout using profanities or namecalling. You should try it sometime. It really enriches your life.
LetitiaB8 11 months ago
Like hunting rifles will stop bomber planes heading to your cities. Like a handgun will stop a tank dead in it's tracks.
The people in Tunisia & Egypt didn't need guns.
flerrel 11 months ago
Rossem seems like the kind of person who tries to turn everything around on the person he disagrees with. People like that are assholes plain and simple.
OzzyFan87 1 year ago
@OzzyFan87 Well if he was that kind of a person (I don't know him personally of course, but I see he's a regular on the shows that I watch) he probably wouldn't have been so easy on Mr. Pratt, I mean the Netherlands haven't had a king in over a 100 years and England wasn't conquered despite their laws about firearms. And those are just things I've noticed without having the profound knowledge of history Mr. van Rossem has (he's a historian).
TheRacistsMustDie 1 year ago
Als ik alleen aan me zelf zou denken zou ik zeggen natuurlijk wil ik een geweer om me zelf te beschermen maar wil ik ook dat mn buurman er een in zn nachtkastje heeft liggen....
FullFledged2010 1 year ago
If only those people had guns in the WTC on 9/11. They could have shot at the airplane and stopped those goddamn terrorists. That shit would have never happened in Texas, at least we USE our right to bare arms. Dumb socialistic yuppies in New York.
...is something Pratt could say. What an imbecile! Anyway let those rednecks keep their guns, it speeds up the process of them killing each other. See as a speedy version of Darwin's survival of the fittest. Death of the dumbest.
bellerina88 1 year ago 4
ik heb een messenset van de hema met bladen tot 30 cm, lijkt me effectief genoeg om me te beschermen
superrfunky 1 year ago
Hahahahaha wat een sukkel. De Wehrmacht was in die tijd zo geavanceerde, wij liepen nog met mitrailleurs uit de 1ste wereld oorlog terwijl zij met tanks, bommenwerpers en paratroopers binnen kwamen walsen. Volgens mij was het ook niet per se dat we echt overwonnen waren maar omdat duitsland onze steden bombardeerden en we niet nog meer levens en cultuur wouden verspillen voor een oorlog die we nooit zouden winnen.
philateliceun 1 year ago
And btw guns are not the only things that will protect you. You can make firebombs, explosive bombs, slingshots, spears, knifes and lots more just from household articles (atleast partially). This whole idea that you can only be safe with guns is really retarded. I wouldn't feel safe if I just got into an argument with somebody and know that he has a gun at home, how can anybody feel safe when you know everybody, even people who hate you have guns?
philateliceun 1 year ago
‘The only thing necessary for the triumph [of evil] is for good men to do nothing.’
foxgirl38 1 year ago
AAHAAAAAH, Pratt is een f*ckin idioot. Dit gaat echt te ver. Dergelijke personen zouden ze wat mij betreft gewoon op mogen sluiten xD
TheRealmsNL 1 year ago
Larry Pratt is great, join the Gun Owners of America!
camohat 1 year ago
Rofl, yeah, the US is full of logic; You should have the right to shoot people when you feel threatened, but smoking something as simple and natural as marihuana without disturbing anyone will put you in prison.
American authorities are full of shit; they do anything to make money. Maybe when they get bombed again they'll stop acting like the rulers of the world.
trapfman 1 year ago
Okay, ik heb een geweer... kut, de USA Army heeft een B2-bommenwerpers en aan leger van tanks, UAVs, vliegdekschepen, etc. etc. etc.
Yeah, right.
daddyleon 1 year ago
Guns are deadly; don't mess with that! Oh, it's the law? Sure, fire it up to yours choosing...
rirtif 2 years ago
I want a gun so I can kill Jan Peter Balkenende.
videoclog 2 years ago
Lulkoek ! van Rossem praat met een Texas Ranger. Een nazaat die de hele American-Native people hebben uitgeroeid.
grozja 2 years ago
I'm Dutch, I like van Rossem but I agree with the other guy. People should be allowed to defend themselves with fire arms against not only criminals (since the Dutch police is utterly useless in doing that) and against a possible repressing government.
captainkid1 2 years ago
The Dutch police is terrible? Crime rates are below the eu avarage with a police force only two thirds the avarage.
People are much more likely to kill themselves, their kids or their neighbours (by accident or on purpose) then to save their lives by carying guns. Even when being atacked, robbed, or threatened, weapons are more likely to get you killed then to save you.
The militia vs. government argument is ridicilous. Armed civilians are no thread to a modern army AT ALL.
gr0mithtimon 1 year ago 2
@gr0mithtimon Indeed, that Pratt guy is full of it. He just loves his shotgun so much he wouldn't give it up for the world.
Koopatroopa01 1 year ago
Jemig, die Pratt heeft echt geen verstand van geschiedenis, alsof wij een koning hadden en als we die al hadden had die al niks over overgave te zeggen. Net doen alsof die blaffertjes V1's, V2's, tanks en vliegtuigbommen hadden tegengehouden. Ja dan hadden we natuurlijk na Rotterdam gezegd dat we pistolen hadden tegen die Duitsers en dat we echt hadden kunnen voorkomen dat Amsterdam en wie weet nog wel andere plaatsen gebombardeerd zouden worden.
Kortom: lulkoek met een stropdas.
vincevampje 2 years ago 15
Idd lulkoek met een stropdas, maar ik wil toch even melden dat bij de inval in Nederland nog een V-raketten beschikbaar waren in Germania
HomieAFCA 2 years ago
Beetje makkelijk om een technisch foutje van de man er zo uit te lichten. Maakt het wat uit welk onderdeel van de regering zich overgaf?
In Frankrijk en Polen en vast veel andere landen waren er partizanen/bewapende verzetsstrijders die een militie vormden tegen de Duitsers en guerilla oorlogsvoering voerden. Dit was in Nederland onmogelijk omdat niemand hier wapens had.
captainkid1 2 years ago
Het idee dat een stelletje hollandse burgers de krijgsmacht die de modernste legers van Europa onder de voet liep tegen had kunnen houden is te belachelijk voor woorden.
Leuk dat je Frankrijk en polen noemt. Beide landen werden onder de voet gelopen. Ondanks het goede werk van partizanen. Ze werden bevrijd door legers. Niet door Partizanen. Begrijp me niet verkeerd, de partizanen deden geweldig werk. Maar het argument is stom.
gr0mithtimon 1 year ago
@vincevampje Inderdaad, complete onzin. Het is een overblijfsel van de koude oorlog. Zij hebben geweren, dus wij moeten ze ook hebben.
Koopatroopa01 1 year ago
Guns+Flag+Bell= Freedoom.
By A Gun Keep Your Goverment In Check.
Captb55806 2 years ago
Comment removed
Ag12x 2 years ago
There are two van Goghs. Pratt is talking about the movie director and you are talking about the guy who made paintings.
Terrorschlag 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
this guy Van Rossem is an total dumbass! I'm sick and tired that we Americans have to go over to europe and liberate them! if they just arm themselfs and have some balls and fight, we won't have to go over there and kick some ass! but what he fails to see the world bankers want to inslave all of us, to do that they need to disarm the people. they got most of europe because there are weak! now there after the USA and we to are asleep! Thank you Larry for standing for Truth!!
jimorocks 2 years ago
If you want to call somebody a dumbass, make sure you don't uncover you are a dumbass yourself..
klaassss 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I am Dutch, and I totally agree with you that "van rossem" is a media attention craving whore and has totally NO idea what is going on. This guy is what we call a table-intellectual appearing on prime time tv. I do not want his opinions, i do not share his opinions, frankly that dude annoys me A LOT! Dutch ideal and the dutch-system cannot be compared to American values and ideal.
LemonAndYoghurt 2 years ago
You're quite ignorant.. I'm also Dutch and Maarten van Rossem is definitely not a "media attention craving whore". He gets asked by shows because of his expertise, but most of all because of his pessimistic attitude (which is something many people like, or think it's a sign of intilligence). And about his expertise, the guy is a freaking professor and he graduated history at a university.
rensjex 2 years ago 22
@rensjex Exacly. He was been a historic professor at the University of Utrecht. My parents followed his classes.
Koopatroopa01 1 year ago
@jimorocks"I'm sick and tired that we Americans have to go over to europe and liberate them!" I'm getting so sick and tired that we europeans have to save America every time they make a global financial mess of things.
If it wasn't for europeans, you and youre country wouldn't even exist.
This kind of retoric that you are displaying is retarted. You're an idiot.
robertvdpoel 1 year ago
"The emblem of a free man is a gun"
So according to Larry Pratt, Lee Harvey Oswald had all the right to kill the president at that time?
rirtif 2 years ago 5
middletownDreamz.... In Europe, we defend ourselves with words and arguments. It's historically totally incorrect that holland was able to defend itself against the nazi's, In the Netherlands we have a democracy so we don't have to defend ourselves against the government
aardappelneez 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If half the Jews who perished in the Nazi death camps had had a shotgun in their own homes, there would have been no holocaust. Look at the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. It started with four or five Jews with revolvers and it spread into a wide rebellion.
MiddletownDreamz 2 years ago
In Europe, we don't need to defend ourselves. In Europe it's much more safe than in the US. In Holland we have an expression which says 'possibillity produces the thief'.
aardappelneez 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Then you are fools if you refuse to defend yourselves. Safer in Europe than in America? BULLSHIT. Since Britain enforced its gun ban the crime and murder rate has surpassed that of the United States. Also, the presence of firearms in the hands of American citizens has prevented the rise of a Hitler or a Stalin as it has done in Europe in the 20th century. The next time Holland is invaded and occupied by a foreign power don't beg America to help liberate you.
MiddletownDreamz 2 years ago
Wahahaha, dude, really.. What's your problem man.. Crime and murder rate? Whaha, seriously check your sources..
klaassss 2 years ago 2
I dont even think most people in Europe want the right to defend themselves. If their governments turn tyrannical I doubt they would give a shit. I say fuck em. Keep your UN and leave the US alone.
HKBM45 2 years ago
:) YES!
RandyOparowski 2 years ago