Added: 1 year ago
From: youVSmee
Views: 971
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • There is no conscious particle. The behavior is weird to us becouse our perception and knowledge is insufficient.

  • Derp

  • ...or slittssss.....mmmkay?

    Bonus!

    Slit number one....tell her what she's won, Ron!

  • The particle does not split, that was only a hypothesis which they are still not certain. Another idea supports that the energy being emitted is always in the wave state until being observed. When the wave collapses it transforms into a particle, see Heisenberg's Uncertainty principal. There is not a conscious state within the particle. The conscious is eternally connected. Vogelsang found that the conscious is neither matter nor energy, note the action of quantum entanglement.

  • @GateMessenger

    Yes, the duality of the wave-particle is collapsed due to a "conscious" state. The Copenhagen Interpretation, the Double-Slit experiments and the Quantum Eraser branches off of the Double Slit experiments.

    I realize that the EPR experiment projected these "spooky actions from a distance" as Einstein stated. Now, I also believe that the Quantum Eraser along with the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiments can demonstrate that a particles momentum & position can be measured.

  • @Gate

    I figure since the Quantum Eraser & the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiments demonstrate that the particles are able to "recommunicate" after one of the particles memory has been erased. Since the "present" can affect the "past" according to the DCQE & QE experiments, then within the "present" the momentum/position can be measured and this "present" measurement also affects the "past", there4, one can presumeably measure a particles momentum/position simultaneously-2 places at once.

  • @Gate

    This is what I think. I think that the wave function is mathematical expression which shows the probability of where a particle might be within the wave, yet this "uncertainty" of where it is, can best describe this state as a neutral state.

    Therefore, I believe that a "probable potential" state can easily be shown to be a 'non-eternal" since it is "dependent" on something ( spooky actions" from a distance ) other than itself in order to exist.

    By the way, "thanks" for your feedback.:)

  • @youVSmee HAHAHAHAH "Spooky Actions From A Distance". That should be the story of a veuyeristic stalker thriller book of the month club.

    Every single thing is the result of a vibrational frequency. That is the wave. That is the "reality". Therefore, measuring them limits our potential to properly use them to our biggest advantage. By advantage, I mean, sustainability. This is the future of energy. Tapping into earthly vibrational energy (i.e. solar, tidal and geo-thermal). That is next

  • @youVSmee Kindly sir, you miss the the point... momentum & position follow the uncertainty principal, position and momentum cannot both be measured exactly. It is precisely this fact and no other that indicates the presence of consciousness... A conscious system is known by the possibilities it can generate, that is it's hallmark.

  • @GateMessenger It's always a wave is correct. And I do believe conscious energy is a completely fundamental aspect of the quantum realm. "Twin Particles" is very interesting in this regard. Two photons sent in opposite directions nearly 7 miles apart, mirror the reaction via stimulus to one of the particles. Conscious energy is the "Wave". It's where our consciousness comes from. I'm feel very comfortable in that hypothesis. It's a whole other thing proving it. HAHAHAHAH

  • @consciousnesswarrior Energy being emitted is always in a wave state can be proven. All one needs to do is repeat the double slit experiment with more than two slits. Two slits produce 2 electrons then 20 slits would produce 20 electrons when observed. That simple experiment would prove one particle fired at a time is in the wave state until being observed. If this is true then someone could actually build a device to turn all the waves in the universe which interact with us into free energy.

  • @GateMessenger Excellent! I wonder why they haven't tried it that way yet. But, it would definitely go a long way in proving that nothing exists as a "particle". But, I'm not sure 20 slits would 20 "particles". Definitely worth a shot.

  • Can a tree fall/collapse without an observer? Can the momentum and the postion of a particle be simultaneously measured? No?? Well, I believe that the Heinsenburg Uncertainty Principle has to be reexamined due to the new evidence.

    Not only must an observer ( a conscous state ) be present in order to observe the momentum & position of a fallen tree, but according the principles of Quantum Eraser, the "past" is affected by the "present" via a timeless state.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more