More than 1,000 dissenting scientists (updates previous 700 scientist report) from around the globe have now challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore. This new 2010 321-page Climate Depot Special Report -- updated from the 2007 groundbreaking U.S. Senate Report of over 400 scientists who voiced skepticism about the so-called global warming “consensus”
Global warming is a white-collar scame. I think Pier Corbyn have made that clear with his weather forecasting. He forecasted a wet sommer here, and it certainly has been.
What i can understand before the last little ice age it was very wet, exactly how it is now. So we might be headed for a cooler period.
The only idiots that gave thumbs down to this video , are the stupid liberal morons , the brainwashed sheep that have been thought in government schools that "racism" "sexism" , "homophobia" and "global warming" are realities and do exist... poor idiotic sheeple, they are the tools of the NWO
@LordFeeblelongdick Perhaps if you had studied in a government school, you would've been able to spell 'taught'. I won't address your incoherent rambling, since it's evident that you don't know what you're talking about.
corrections: causation has more or less been proved by the IRIS satellite which measured outgoing infrared radiation and found a decrease over time corresponding to the absorption bands of the greenhouse gases (otherwise the correlation could have been due to the decreased solubility of CO2 in the oceans).
Also it is naive to suggest that technological innovation will just occur without incentives (subsidies and taxes), there is no reason for the free market to stop using coal as it is cheap.
is GW real? I don't know, but what I do know is that pollution itself is real and we are empowered to take full responsibility for this planet and it's resources. In nature, there is no reason people should be dependent on polluting forms of energy or materials. but what we are dependent on is a monetary system that is in turn controlled by the rich. they don't let money go where it should, they use it where they see fit. that is the source of all our problems.
Oh and for all who go crying to the IPCC like every other puddle of piss excuse for a "activist" you've got problems right in there too!
Dr. Yury Izrael Director of global climate and ecology institute, Russian Academy of Science and IPCC vice pres. said this in 2007 "There is no proven link between human activity and global warming", IPCC is like the fucking Federal reserve, i put more trust in my 3 year old neighbor to not hit my knees with a bat than i do with the IPCC and the Fed.
want to know the ultimate fuck off to GW idiots? global warming as they expect may be caused by CO2 right? well they are other green house gasses right? there's O3 and oh yeah H2O (sorry no subtext) um... H2O? isn't that like water? so you're saying that the minuscule 5% of CO2 we (humas) are adding in comparison to volcanoes and other earthy means is more powerful that 3/4 of what is covering our planet, not including what is in the air... GW is a fucking joke that has carried for too long
The only reason I believe in GW is because Venus (2nd planet from the sun) is hotter than Mercury (closest to the sun). If you do some research you can find out that Venus once had a atmosphere very much like Earths, but greenhouse gases were interfering and Venus is now covered in a thick cloud of Carbon Dioxide trapping sunlight and heat. CO2 is produced on earth from human endeavours. I dont want to be as hot as Venus X_X
@scottish333 well, thank gosh for your fears, i mean we wouldn't have ever wanted to disappoint you... try looking at how close Venus is to the sun then where earth is, GW is not going to make us turn into a fuzz ball of gas and molten lava I promise you that mainly because GW is not real (well we humans aren't causing it)
These talking points are the same points used since the beginning of the Global Warming/Climate change scam! There was a Global warming that ended the Ice Age that was not man made, and look how the human race thrived. This is a natural weather pattern, and there are plenty of scientist to prove it.
HOAX!!! al gore will be richer than bill gates in a few years and we will all be jobless and living in hovels thats the plan and the GW Kool-Aid crew is all too happy to usher it right on in
LOL...I'm from Florida...N 28 2' 22"...it is cold....5 straight days of less than 32 degrees...my grass is dead and brown...lived here since 1971 and NEVER have seen it like this...it snowed in Tampa!!....you are the ones who match the thought control song by Pink Floyd..."believe us, not your eyes"...shutup!!! Global warming my asprin bottle!!!!
YES, i am a paid shill. the cia, exxon, apple computers, apple records, whole foods, trojan, mercedes, halliburton, toys r us, bloomingdales and others, all gave me fifty cents. it's such a conspiracy!
Everyone. relicofgold is a paid shill for these Carbon Credit scammers who want to tax you for breathing out Carbon dioxide, that plants need to live & produce oxygen for us to live.
relicofgold is a paid shill-relicofgold is a paid shill-relicofgold is a paid shill
We're awake to the lies & watching shills like you. Go grawl back into whatever little whole u crawled out from. It's all over for you.
If that's what you're about, then I'm in agreement with you. Maybe you don't fully understand that those who're behind the Global Warming Scam are the very Oil compaines & corrupt bankers who are who've created ALL the pollution, acid rain, Rain Forest destruction. you are still caught within the Left Right Paradigm that they have constructed to decieve you. Ever heard of good cop, bad cop routine? They're doing it on a Global level. They pollute then want to tax us into submission and poverty.
Are you still at work on these Global Warming Scam vids? Be honest, weirdo, are you a paid shill from Langley Virginia? Did the CIA pay you as a CoIntelPro agent to spread disinformation?
No one could be as stupid as you for real. Are you at least being paid by the Global Warming Scammers.
you are the same prick on another vid that said repeatedly, that CARBON DIOXIDE is lethal from a car's tailpipe.
Every planet in our solar system has or is undergoing changes. I feel that the one world government has magnified the problem using technologies such as HAARP, and through the various Geo-Engineering/Atmospheric spraying programs that are utilizing things such as Barium salts and Aluminum particles.
Global warming is a democratic produced dream based on ca$h and backed by self proclaimed scientists. Al Gore will not openly debate this issue with any credible and reputable scholar and Colemann and his 30k actual scientists where which 9k of them are P.H.D's should be all you need as proof that Global Warming is a TOTAL lie. But I understand you believe it if its on the news. But Al Gore couldn't even win his own state in the 2,000 election. People know a crook when they see one!
Global warming is real it is just that we mere humans can't do anything about it. What about solar flares or the CO2 emissions volcanos emit? Anthropocentrism is just silly, the Universe could give a shit about us.
"The world is a dangerous place 2 live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it" Albert Einstein.
I agree with you 100%. You are absolutely correct. those who believe in Global Warming are most likely the same idiots who voted for "Hussien" as our president.
If you read all of NXSchells posts this person is well informed and very intelligent. All postings make good sound adivce. Its a pity that the world is run by imbeciles
The total atmosphere is said to heat the earth by 33°C.
Propagandists say 41% of the heat leaving the surface of the earth is radiation. It's actually closer to 1%, but just look how ridiculous the result is even when using the 41%.
Only 8% of the radiation is of a frequency which can be absorbed by CO2.
So 33°C X 41% X 8% = 1.08°C — The total heat that CO2 supposedly produces.
Then humans only put 3% of the CO2 into the air. Frauds say it accumulated to 30%
But even with the 30% figure, we must multiply the 1.08°C time 30%, which equals 0.32°C.
If then, the fake mechanism high in the atmosphere only concerns the shoulders on the absorption peaks, the fraction gets smaller. 5% is about what they are talking about. But even if it is 10%, the increase in global temperature caused by humans putting carbon dioxide into the air is an absolute maximum of 0.032°C.
These numbers are so undeniable, that the frauds produced another rationalization.
They said water vapor multiplies the effect. They call it forcing. They say CO2 heats a little bit, and this heat causes more water to evaporate from the oceans, and the water vapor heats the globe 3 to 10 times more.
Multiplying by 10 would only be 0.32°C. They claim it is already 0.6°C and is going to increase some more. These numbers cannot be increased.
The upper, maximum limit for human induced temperature change based on the claims of the frauds is 0.32°C.
My words should be taken literally in their interpretation. I am implying nothing other than what I've said.
You are mistaking my intent as an attack on your person. I am merely striking down the issue at its core. Everything else stems from this one critical assumption.
You've asked me to share my knowledge, very well. I will show that the upper, maximum limit for human induced temperature change based on the claims of the frauds is 0.32°C.
NXSchell, if you're going to provide citation for the NASA information you need to do the same for statements which follow, e.g. "The carbon cycle is not well understood." By whom, you? This is a very broad statement and it would be helpful to know who made that assertion and why.
Hey TheSymbolofProximity, you fricking genius, "If all the ice melts in the Arctic, the water level will not rise one inch." Check out 1:34 in the video and while you're at it go look up Archimedes on Wikipedia. Eureka!
GW is a natural state of our planet.2012 is the transit of venus.They say the poles will invert...is that true? I dont know,but its possible.One pole melts,the other freezes.After a couple of million years,the frozen one tips the planet upside down.That pole starts melting,the other freezes over again.Why do you think they found fosilised tropical plants in Canada,yet we are not tropical,or we were and we will be again...thats what I think
the Symbolof Proximity:I think you are probably right, as the regression of ice in Glacier Bay in Alaska over the past 200 years indicates the melting of glaciers etc. has been going on a lot longer than industry and "pollution" what about earth core temperatures, dont hear much about that. lots of energy under the surface of the earth i suspect...related to moon tidal effects?of course sun energy is big too.this is about gaining more "control "(maybe the new enemy for men to deal with)
well, we humans somehow are causing end of eco-system, with urbanisem and with too huge population (what is also reason for alot of CO2)... But what smells about global warming is that it started wih politicans... But this is good video, makes you look in many ways, not only in way someone wants you to...
The first paragraph was said well. As to the Arctic sea ice in 07, did it rebound or re-form in 08 or 09 a suprisingly large amount? I heard that somewhere & can't remember where, or if it was creditable. I'd hope I wouldn't remember it, if it wasn't creditable.
You were mentioning strawman earlier. The "CO2 is not a pollutant" is a classic. The argument might address the popular argument repeated in the mass media, but not the scientific one. The scientists are not saying CO2 is a pollutant. CO2 is basically plant food. What they are saying is that the *excess* of CO2 coming from industrial waste is having negative effects, such as increased heat trapping and ocean acidification (See link posted in the info section on this one).
Since, as you said, no willfull ignorance is accepted, I suggest you read the PDF link posted in the info section, specifically "Part II: Is GW caused by human activities?" which responds to Carter's no-points about GW being all natural & rosy.
He cites the House of Lords & the US senate as if those were scientific institutions.
He doesn't mention that their most prestigious scientific institutions, the US Academy of Sciences and its UK equivalent, the Royal Society, both endorse GW, along with 25 or so Academies in the world (2007 joined statement).
Right, clouds are a big factor in climate (as stated in this video) , but we still don't know to which extent, and you can't simply extrapolate a short-term observation (weather) to a long term one (climate).
Right, climate sensitivity. Nobody said climate science was easy.
Dishonest statement about computer models, if you know how climate science works. Models are not set in stone once & for all, but continuously revised with new data.
The Urban Heat Island effect (UHI) is known & uncontroversial, contrarily to what Carter pretends.
UHI is corrected according to the sensors locations using several techniques (satellite-derived night light observations , corrections for population, etc..).
The highly publicized - and still, they pretend they are "silenced" - "hockey stick" criticism by McIntyre was disproved by Mann & Wahl in 2004. Published by the National Center for Atmospheric Research.
The so-called Medieval Warm Period (MWP) was debunked by Jones & Mann (Reviews of Geophysics, 2004). It uses regional temperature data instead of global mean temperarture. Same faulty logic with the LIA (Little Ice Age).
There is no pattern in the last 25 years linking sun activity to the *present* climate change (see PDF & NASA links).
No, you've called this one wrong. I won't go into the science here, nor show the math models used by global warmists are wrong, suffice to say -yr point that there is a problem but global solutions are not the answer is only half right. Read what elite thinktank Club of Rome wrote in the 70s in The First Global Revolution. It's a manufactured hoax (problem), stirring up fear (reaction) and proposing Cap & Trade - global carbon tax to a WORLD bank (solution); part of a bigger agenda. Look again.
Did you know that on a timescale of 10 000 years the earth is cooling?
Did you know that temperature rise prior to any raised level of CO2, they act independently? Did you know that CO2 is good and has ensured that plant life has better growth? Did you know that temperature fluctuate? Did you know that we were able to plant grapes on an Island that today is covered with ice 1000 years ago? I agree in part... the ones claiming there's global warming should drown, then it'll stop.
So long as there is money in oil, there will continue to be pollution and global warming. Big businesses care nothing about the health of the people nor the health of the planet. It's all about the money.
Interesting since all the big business and corporations fund the idea of global warming whilst those who are against this concept get's silenced/censored, threatened, are not allowed to debate, and get their fundings taken away from them if they dissent. In order to understand what I'll be saying, you need to understand economics. The state protects big business and corporations from competition. To stop Global warming requires a state. The state protects big business. Get it?
I've attatched two movie reply's but they haven't been accepted yet.
Go to my channel, and look up:
To NXSchell on global warming part 1 of 12. I have an additional 4-5 videos that one also can take a look at.
My view on Global warming is that it hasn't been becomming warmer under the last 8 years and that since 10 000 years back the earth's been cooling and that these are normal fluctuations. We may have contributed to some warmth though but extremelly minor.
I stopped watching after 20 seconds when I realized that Robert Carter is your reference.
He claims GW stopped in 1998, but fails to mention that 1998 was the strongest El Nino year. He also fails to note that the 10 years after 1998 were hotter on average than the 10 years before it. Obvious case of intellectual dishonesty & cherry picking of facts.
Carter is a member of IPA. They get their funding from Woodside Petroleum and ExxonMobil (the latter through its subsidiary Esso Australia).
I didn't say he was your *only* reference. But a video series starting right off the bat presenting a known fraud doesn't make a good impression and doesn't invite further reviewing.
I watched half-a-dozen of such "GW is a scam" videos. They were all quite unimpressive. I'll take a look at yours shortly.
It's not a controlled serie, it's a bunch of videos with scientific data, arguments and explainations.
How is he a fraud, though, is his every point a flawed, how about the individuals that are pro Global Warming, does he not adress their flaws correctly?
Make a video dealing with their arguments then, compile a video or serie of videos adressing the counter arguments.
Yes I have my mind made up,it's important that there exist preconcieved ideas. You seem to have made you mind up as wel
Not that it matters, I usually agree 100% with your videos and feel we're on the same page, perhaps even share the very same goals and values judging by your videos.
@organdva i'm sorry but not even the NASA website has "climatologists" fighting for GW prevention and awareness. btw .org sites are about as factual as Wikipedia just so you know... and really? where is it undisputed? amongst the group of Greenpeace social workers? you really need to look up some info buddy before you can quote something suggested to you on youtube...
@ElysiumFilms Yeah. That and betting that the majority of ppl are stupid.
Maybe warmer is good. However, it's end of May and only beginning to be hot here in CA, as opposed to March.
In any case, if we cant adapt, maybe that's one way to reduce population. We are a product of nature; lets nature works its course. Quit trying to control ppl.
"Correlation between CO2 levels and GW does not mean causation." - That is the best point made in this climate change discussion I've heard to date.
On technological innovations, I am very intrigued by the possibilities of geothermo (if you've watched Zeitgeist: Addendum, you know what I'm talking about.
On a side note, I don't know where the rest of you are, but where I am, I'm experiencing the coolest summer ever in my life. Wonder what's up with that!
Could you please give me evidence for your statement?
At least in the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) the CO2-concentration wasn't very high. But according to your comment, there must have been more CO2 because it was very warm. Or do you even have an explanation for this?
This has been flagged as spam show
Don't know if global warming is real or not, I only remember that last few winters I had to constantly dig my way out of snow...
snarfeater 4 months ago in playlist More videos from NXSchell
This has been flagged as spam show
GOOGLE RON PAUL MONEY BOMB DONATE ATLEAST 1$ if you believe in Freedom and Liberty.
NYzwolf 5 months ago
More than 1,000 dissenting scientists (updates previous 700 scientist report) from around the globe have now challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore. This new 2010 321-page Climate Depot Special Report -- updated from the 2007 groundbreaking U.S. Senate Report of over 400 scientists who voiced skepticism about the so-called global warming “consensus”
co2isgoodal 6 months ago 2
Global warming is a white-collar scame. I think Pier Corbyn have made that clear with his weather forecasting. He forecasted a wet sommer here, and it certainly has been.
What i can understand before the last little ice age it was very wet, exactly how it is now. So we might be headed for a cooler period.
kennjohnsen 7 months ago
The only idiots that gave thumbs down to this video , are the stupid liberal morons , the brainwashed sheep that have been thought in government schools that "racism" "sexism" , "homophobia" and "global warming" are realities and do exist... poor idiotic sheeple, they are the tools of the NWO
LordFeeblelongdick 11 months ago
@LordFeeblelongdick Perhaps if you had studied in a government school, you would've been able to spell 'taught'. I won't address your incoherent rambling, since it's evident that you don't know what you're talking about.
heavymetaldeath4life 3 months ago in playlist More videos from NXSchell
corrections: causation has more or less been proved by the IRIS satellite which measured outgoing infrared radiation and found a decrease over time corresponding to the absorption bands of the greenhouse gases (otherwise the correlation could have been due to the decreased solubility of CO2 in the oceans).
Also it is naive to suggest that technological innovation will just occur without incentives (subsidies and taxes), there is no reason for the free market to stop using coal as it is cheap.
crazy1seal 11 months ago
Which version of "Another brick in the wall" is this? It´s very cool?
PhilosophusMansisses 1 year ago
is GW real? I don't know, but what I do know is that pollution itself is real and we are empowered to take full responsibility for this planet and it's resources. In nature, there is no reason people should be dependent on polluting forms of energy or materials. but what we are dependent on is a monetary system that is in turn controlled by the rich. they don't let money go where it should, they use it where they see fit. that is the source of all our problems.
johnniefive80 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Which version of "The Wall" is that? It´s even better than the original one.
PhilosophusMansisses 1 year ago
Comment removed
PhilosophusMansisses 1 year ago
Comment removed
PhilosophusMansisses 1 year ago
Comment removed
PhilosophusMansisses 1 year ago
Comment removed
PhilosophusMansisses 1 year ago
Oh and for all who go crying to the IPCC like every other puddle of piss excuse for a "activist" you've got problems right in there too!
Dr. Yury Izrael Director of global climate and ecology institute, Russian Academy of Science and IPCC vice pres. said this in 2007 "There is no proven link between human activity and global warming", IPCC is like the fucking Federal reserve, i put more trust in my 3 year old neighbor to not hit my knees with a bat than i do with the IPCC and the Fed.
zizn8r 1 year ago
want to know the ultimate fuck off to GW idiots? global warming as they expect may be caused by CO2 right? well they are other green house gasses right? there's O3 and oh yeah H2O (sorry no subtext) um... H2O? isn't that like water? so you're saying that the minuscule 5% of CO2 we (humas) are adding in comparison to volcanoes and other earthy means is more powerful that 3/4 of what is covering our planet, not including what is in the air... GW is a fucking joke that has carried for too long
zizn8r 1 year ago
The only reason I believe in GW is because Venus (2nd planet from the sun) is hotter than Mercury (closest to the sun). If you do some research you can find out that Venus once had a atmosphere very much like Earths, but greenhouse gases were interfering and Venus is now covered in a thick cloud of Carbon Dioxide trapping sunlight and heat. CO2 is produced on earth from human endeavours. I dont want to be as hot as Venus X_X
scottish333 1 year ago
@scottish333 well, thank gosh for your fears, i mean we wouldn't have ever wanted to disappoint you... try looking at how close Venus is to the sun then where earth is, GW is not going to make us turn into a fuzz ball of gas and molten lava I promise you that mainly because GW is not real (well we humans aren't causing it)
zizn8r 1 year ago
These talking points are the same points used since the beginning of the Global Warming/Climate change scam! There was a Global warming that ended the Ice Age that was not man made, and look how the human race thrived. This is a natural weather pattern, and there are plenty of scientist to prove it.
phackitnow 1 year ago
@phackitnow
specie... human specie...
Humans consist of races and is a specie.
Race is a subspecie category.
To what specie are Homo Sapiens Sapiens a subspecie cateory of?
We're a specie of our own, consisting of subspecies (races).
MrHerrIQ 1 year ago
HOAX!!! al gore will be richer than bill gates in a few years and we will all be jobless and living in hovels thats the plan and the GW Kool-Aid crew is all too happy to usher it right on in
recon24d 1 year ago
- Source: NASA is Controlled by Federal Government who is controlled by Jews who did 9/11.
- Credibility: Continues to spread LIES about Landing on the Moon
- Funding: Taxpaying Sheeple
parasitesarefunny 1 year ago
YES finally someone who has a mind!
l3iohazzard 1 year ago
LOL...I'm from Florida...N 28 2' 22"...it is cold....5 straight days of less than 32 degrees...my grass is dead and brown...lived here since 1971 and NEVER have seen it like this...it snowed in Tampa!!....you are the ones who match the thought control song by Pink Floyd..."believe us, not your eyes"...shutup!!! Global warming my asprin bottle!!!!
OhNoEuthyphro 2 years ago
this is the coldest winter america has seen in a couple of decades, how do you explain that
Sturmmann 2 years ago
@Sturmmann AVERAGE temp of the surface of the globe.
Youreallsheople 2 years ago
what? is that a question or something?
Sturmmann 2 years ago
C L I M A T E G A T E !!!!!!!
Tealy855 2 years ago
Oh my GOD !!!!! that relicogold is a paid op
shill-
and they are trying to block the video-
GLOBAL WARMING OR GLOBAL GOVERNANCE - sending me threatening
emails - and phone calls ....
Tealy855 2 years ago
I suggest taking a comedy class, or something like the Groundlings.
Unless you weren't trying to be funny. It's really hard to tell, because, ya know, you're not that funny.
But if you were trying to make a point....now that's funny.
dyingtodeath 2 years ago
No - I realy am getting threatening email and calls - maybe kids - I dont know-
But I have been complainig about this scam and 9/11 and Chemtrails
Tealy855 2 years ago
this is great.
YES, i am a paid shill. the cia, exxon, apple computers, apple records, whole foods, trojan, mercedes, halliburton, toys r us, bloomingdales and others, all gave me fifty cents. it's such a conspiracy!
relicofgold 2 years ago
They gave me a hundred bucks not to say
anything - So I wont tell you that GW is being used to create World Government and HAARP is using the chemtrails metal
in the atmosphere to transmit current for
weather control but poisoning all that breath as a bonus - and about the 600 billion dollar opium/ heroin racket they have going in Afrganistan,
Tealy855 2 years ago
You sold out cheep !!!
Tealy855 2 years ago
Everyone. relicofgold is a paid shill for these Carbon Credit scammers who want to tax you for breathing out Carbon dioxide, that plants need to live & produce oxygen for us to live.
relicofgold is a paid shill-relicofgold is a paid shill-relicofgold is a paid shill
We're awake to the lies & watching shills like you. Go grawl back into whatever little whole u crawled out from. It's all over for you.
dyingtodeath 2 years ago
LMFAO. this is too funny.
ok, you can consider me a paid shill of the oil companies.
even though my main point is that we should use renwables, which would reduce the amount of products sold by the oil companies.
now THAT'S logic.
relicofgold 2 years ago
If that's what you're about, then I'm in agreement with you. Maybe you don't fully understand that those who're behind the Global Warming Scam are the very Oil compaines & corrupt bankers who are who've created ALL the pollution, acid rain, Rain Forest destruction. you are still caught within the Left Right Paradigm that they have constructed to decieve you. Ever heard of good cop, bad cop routine? They're doing it on a Global level. They pollute then want to tax us into submission and poverty.
dyingtodeath 2 years ago
this is the most sane depiction of the GW controversey i've seen on youtube.
but don't argue people. they won't know the truth for hundreds of years.
so, follow the money..........the energy companies want to disqualify any idea of GW.....it's their billions profits per quarter they're protecting.
stop using fossil fuels for an even better reason: pollution, which kills millions worldwide each year and costs tens of billions each year.
relicofgold 2 years ago 8
What - ???? THE ENERGY COMPANIES ARE THE ONES FUNDING THIS GW SCAM--ignoramass
Tealy855 2 years ago
keep drinking the kool-aid tealy.
suck it dry.
relicofgold 2 years ago
Are you still at work on these Global Warming Scam vids? Be honest, weirdo, are you a paid shill from Langley Virginia? Did the CIA pay you as a CoIntelPro agent to spread disinformation?
No one could be as stupid as you for real. Are you at least being paid by the Global Warming Scammers.
you are the same prick on another vid that said repeatedly, that CARBON DIOXIDE is lethal from a car's tailpipe.
Carbon Monoxide is the poison. you are a moron.
dyingtodeath 2 years ago
I was actually proposing number 3. lol
UcanbeGOD 2 years ago
Every planet in our solar system has or is undergoing changes. I feel that the one world government has magnified the problem using technologies such as HAARP, and through the various Geo-Engineering/Atmospheric spraying programs that are utilizing things such as Barium salts and Aluminum particles.
MuammarAlGathafi 2 years ago
I agree with you Muammar 100%!!! Truth
coldhardfacts 2 years ago
Global warming is a democratic produced dream based on ca$h and backed by self proclaimed scientists. Al Gore will not openly debate this issue with any credible and reputable scholar and Colemann and his 30k actual scientists where which 9k of them are P.H.D's should be all you need as proof that Global Warming is a TOTAL lie. But I understand you believe it if its on the news. But Al Gore couldn't even win his own state in the 2,000 election. People know a crook when they see one!
oklahomasongwriter 2 years ago
if you love co2 so much
wrap your lying lips around your exhaust pipe and breathe deep.
it'll save us all a lot of wasted hot air.
relicofgold 2 years ago
Thanks for sharing, the intro, and links. Well done!
I will further investigate.
Have a great day!
Lisa from Munich
Sundrumify 2 years ago
Global warming is real it is just that we mere humans can't do anything about it. What about solar flares or the CO2 emissions volcanos emit? Anthropocentrism is just silly, the Universe could give a shit about us.
xxdiogenescynicxx 2 years ago
"The world is a dangerous place 2 live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it" Albert Einstein.
IONIESKYE 2 years ago
WATCH: GLOBAL WARMING OR GLOBAL
GOVERNANCE ? VIDEO
We have been in a cooling cycle for 3 years now and polar bear populations have increased from 5000 in 1955 to
25,000 in 2006 - Most greenhouse gases
97 % are water vapur and man made
carbon dioxide is about 2 % of the total
CO . THIS REAL ABOUT CARBON CREDITS AND CAP AND TRADE AND AL
GORE MAKING BILLIONS- ITS THE BIGGEST SCAM EVER- THE SAME GLOBALISTS FUNDING THIS SCAM ARE FUNDING JET CHEMTRAILS BLOCKING SUN , Aluminium oxide barum
Tealy855 2 years ago
I agree with you 100%. You are absolutely correct. those who believe in Global Warming are most likely the same idiots who voted for "Hussien" as our president.
MoGrass51 2 years ago
suck on your own exhaust pipe if you love co2 so much.
relicofgold 2 years ago
If you read all of NXSchells posts this person is well informed and very intelligent. All postings make good sound adivce. Its a pity that the world is run by imbeciles
conger66 2 years ago
The total atmosphere is said to heat the earth by 33°C.
Propagandists say 41% of the heat leaving the surface of the earth is radiation. It's actually closer to 1%, but just look how ridiculous the result is even when using the 41%.
Only 8% of the radiation is of a frequency which can be absorbed by CO2.
So 33°C X 41% X 8% = 1.08°C — The total heat that CO2 supposedly produces.
Then humans only put 3% of the CO2 into the air. Frauds say it accumulated to 30%
PhysicsPsychic101 2 years ago
But even with the 30% figure, we must multiply the 1.08°C time 30%, which equals 0.32°C.
If then, the fake mechanism high in the atmosphere only concerns the shoulders on the absorption peaks, the fraction gets smaller. 5% is about what they are talking about. But even if it is 10%, the increase in global temperature caused by humans putting carbon dioxide into the air is an absolute maximum of 0.032°C.
These numbers are so undeniable, that the frauds produced another rationalization.
PhysicsPsychic101 2 years ago
They said water vapor multiplies the effect. They call it forcing. They say CO2 heats a little bit, and this heat causes more water to evaporate from the oceans, and the water vapor heats the globe 3 to 10 times more.
Multiplying by 10 would only be 0.32°C. They claim it is already 0.6°C and is going to increase some more. These numbers cannot be increased.
The upper, maximum limit for human induced temperature change based on the claims of the frauds is 0.32°C.
PhysicsPsychic101 2 years ago
My words should be taken literally in their interpretation. I am implying nothing other than what I've said.
You are mistaking my intent as an attack on your person. I am merely striking down the issue at its core. Everything else stems from this one critical assumption.
You've asked me to share my knowledge, very well. I will show that the upper, maximum limit for human induced temperature change based on the claims of the frauds is 0.32°C.
PhysicsPsychic101 2 years ago
NXSchell, if you're going to provide citation for the NASA information you need to do the same for statements which follow, e.g. "The carbon cycle is not well understood." By whom, you? This is a very broad statement and it would be helpful to know who made that assertion and why.
granulorhoek 2 years ago
Hey TheSymbolofProximity, you fricking genius, "If all the ice melts in the Arctic, the water level will not rise one inch." Check out 1:34 in the video and while you're at it go look up Archimedes on Wikipedia. Eureka!
granulorhoek 2 years ago
GW is a natural state of our planet.2012 is the transit of venus.They say the poles will invert...is that true? I dont know,but its possible.One pole melts,the other freezes.After a couple of million years,the frozen one tips the planet upside down.That pole starts melting,the other freezes over again.Why do you think they found fosilised tropical plants in Canada,yet we are not tropical,or we were and we will be again...thats what I think
Skin828 2 years ago
the Symbolof Proximity:I think you are probably right, as the regression of ice in Glacier Bay in Alaska over the past 200 years indicates the melting of glaciers etc. has been going on a lot longer than industry and "pollution" what about earth core temperatures, dont hear much about that. lots of energy under the surface of the earth i suspect...related to moon tidal effects?of course sun energy is big too.this is about gaining more "control "(maybe the new enemy for men to deal with)
trebitschlincoln 2 years ago
well, we humans somehow are causing end of eco-system, with urbanisem and with too huge population (what is also reason for alot of CO2)... But what smells about global warming is that it started wih politicans... But this is good video, makes you look in many ways, not only in way someone wants you to...
Slovejnc 2 years ago
The first paragraph was said well. As to the Arctic sea ice in 07, did it rebound or re-form in 08 or 09 a suprisingly large amount? I heard that somewhere & can't remember where, or if it was creditable. I'd hope I wouldn't remember it, if it wasn't creditable.
turboz1k 2 years ago
hmmmm hay NXSchell are you familiar with the "The Venus Project"?
captainwillies69 2 years ago
Part1
You were mentioning strawman earlier. The "CO2 is not a pollutant" is a classic. The argument might address the popular argument repeated in the mass media, but not the scientific one. The scientists are not saying CO2 is a pollutant. CO2 is basically plant food. What they are saying is that the *excess* of CO2 coming from industrial waste is having negative effects, such as increased heat trapping and ocean acidification (See link posted in the info section on this one).
(CONT)
NXSchell 2 years ago
Part 1(cont)
Since, as you said, no willfull ignorance is accepted, I suggest you read the PDF link posted in the info section, specifically "Part II: Is GW caused by human activities?" which responds to Carter's no-points about GW being all natural & rosy.
NXSchell 2 years ago
Part 2
He cites the House of Lords & the US senate as if those were scientific institutions.
He doesn't mention that their most prestigious scientific institutions, the US Academy of Sciences and its UK equivalent, the Royal Society, both endorse GW, along with 25 or so Academies in the world (2007 joined statement).
NXSchell 2 years ago
Part 3
Right, clouds are a big factor in climate (as stated in this video) , but we still don't know to which extent, and you can't simply extrapolate a short-term observation (weather) to a long term one (climate).
Right, climate sensitivity. Nobody said climate science was easy.
Dishonest statement about computer models, if you know how climate science works. Models are not set in stone once & for all, but continuously revised with new data.
NXSchell 2 years ago
Part 4
The Urban Heat Island effect (UHI) is known & uncontroversial, contrarily to what Carter pretends.
UHI is corrected according to the sensors locations using several techniques (satellite-derived night light observations , corrections for population, etc..).
The highly publicized - and still, they pretend they are "silenced" - "hockey stick" criticism by McIntyre was disproved by Mann & Wahl in 2004. Published by the National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Exit Carter.
NXSchell 2 years ago
Part 5
The so-called Medieval Warm Period (MWP) was debunked by Jones & Mann (Reviews of Geophysics, 2004). It uses regional temperature data instead of global mean temperarture. Same faulty logic with the LIA (Little Ice Age).
There is no pattern in the last 25 years linking sun activity to the *present* climate change (see PDF & NASA links).
NXSchell 2 years ago
Parts 6, 7 and 8
Right the eco-scam, media hype, scare-mongering, Al Gore, etc..Nothing to really disagree with.
But none of that disproves GW itself.
Part 8 mentions the Oregon petition, which has turned out to be a fraud (see link in info section).
NXSchell 2 years ago
Part 9,10,11,12
"As a scientist, I KNOW that GW doesn't exist at all"
Sorry, a TV weather man is no climate scientist. And sure enough, Part 12 has him confuse weather with climate.
NXSchell 2 years ago
No, you've called this one wrong. I won't go into the science here, nor show the math models used by global warmists are wrong, suffice to say -yr point that there is a problem but global solutions are not the answer is only half right. Read what elite thinktank Club of Rome wrote in the 70s in The First Global Revolution. It's a manufactured hoax (problem), stirring up fear (reaction) and proposing Cap & Trade - global carbon tax to a WORLD bank (solution); part of a bigger agenda. Look again.
NoPrivacyANYMORE10 2 years ago
*Facepalm*
Did you know that on a timescale of 10 000 years the earth is cooling?
Did you know that temperature rise prior to any raised level of CO2, they act independently? Did you know that CO2 is good and has ensured that plant life has better growth? Did you know that temperature fluctuate? Did you know that we were able to plant grapes on an Island that today is covered with ice 1000 years ago? I agree in part... the ones claiming there's global warming should drown, then it'll stop.
ImproveYourLifeNOW 2 years ago
So long as there is money in oil, there will continue to be pollution and global warming. Big businesses care nothing about the health of the people nor the health of the planet. It's all about the money.
JoyousinJesus 2 years ago
Interesting since all the big business and corporations fund the idea of global warming whilst those who are against this concept get's silenced/censored, threatened, are not allowed to debate, and get their fundings taken away from them if they dissent. In order to understand what I'll be saying, you need to understand economics. The state protects big business and corporations from competition. To stop Global warming requires a state. The state protects big business. Get it?
ImproveYourLifeNOW 2 years ago
You're dumber than I thought.
ImproveYourLifeNOW 2 years ago
This video fails
ImproveYourLifeNOW 2 years ago
ImproveYourLifeNOW please show us your video.What are your views ?Tell us your ideas.
xxdonaldqxx 2 years ago
I've attatched two movie reply's but they haven't been accepted yet.
Go to my channel, and look up:
To NXSchell on global warming part 1 of 12. I have an additional 4-5 videos that one also can take a look at.
My view on Global warming is that it hasn't been becomming warmer under the last 8 years and that since 10 000 years back the earth's been cooling and that these are normal fluctuations. We may have contributed to some warmth though but extremelly minor.
ImproveYourLifeNOW 2 years ago
"My view on Global warming is that it hasn't been becomming warmer under the last 8 years"
Where do you get the data to support that view?
"The year 2007 was eighth warmest on record, exceeded by 1998, 2005, 2003, 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2001."
NASA- AIRS mission. See the link to NASA in the info section.
NXSchell 2 years ago
Watch the videos and they'll present it.
Yes but NASA got corrected and have been corrected before.
ImproveYourLifeNOW 2 years ago
I stopped watching after 20 seconds when I realized that Robert Carter is your reference.
He claims GW stopped in 1998, but fails to mention that 1998 was the strongest El Nino year. He also fails to note that the 10 years after 1998 were hotter on average than the 10 years before it. Obvious case of intellectual dishonesty & cherry picking of facts.
Carter is a member of IPA. They get their funding from Woodside Petroleum and ExxonMobil (the latter through its subsidiary Esso Australia).
NXSchell 2 years ago
That's a lie/strawman.
Robert Carter is not my only/main reference.
Go back and watch the whole serie!
Back you go!
No willfull ignorance is accepted.
ImproveYourLifeNOW 2 years ago
"That's a lie/strawman.
Robert Carter is not my only/main reference."
Take it easy.
I didn't say he was your *only* reference. But a video series starting right off the bat presenting a known fraud doesn't make a good impression and doesn't invite further reviewing.
I watched half-a-dozen of such "GW is a scam" videos. They were all quite unimpressive. I'll take a look at yours shortly.
NXSchell 2 years ago
It's not a controlled serie, it's a bunch of videos with scientific data, arguments and explainations.
How is he a fraud, though, is his every point a flawed, how about the individuals that are pro Global Warming, does he not adress their flaws correctly?
Make a video dealing with their arguments then, compile a video or serie of videos adressing the counter arguments.
Yes I have my mind made up,it's important that there exist preconcieved ideas. You seem to have made you mind up as wel
ImproveYourLifeNOW 2 years ago
Not that it matters, I usually agree 100% with your videos and feel we're on the same page, perhaps even share the very same goals and values judging by your videos.
This however, I fundamentally disagree with.
ImproveYourLifeNOW 2 years ago
I don't get why commentators don't check the links in the sidebar?
FACT:''Is undisputed that humans are entirely responsible for the increase in atmospheric CO2 over the past few centuries.'' - link2, page 8
organdva 2 years ago 3
@organdva i'm sorry but not even the NASA website has "climatologists" fighting for GW prevention and awareness. btw .org sites are about as factual as Wikipedia just so you know... and really? where is it undisputed? amongst the group of Greenpeace social workers? you really need to look up some info buddy before you can quote something suggested to you on youtube...
zizn8r 1 year ago
@organdva
david222444 11 months ago
@organdva Well I for one dispute it. Has it occurred to you that The Sun may have been responsible.
david222444 11 months ago
@organdva "Undisputed" meaning no opposition groups received funding/media attention to challenge the claim.
HarunDanyal 5 months ago 2
good video but still GW is not a threat and i really think it is not of our dooing, Warm earth also makes more Co2 so could be the other way aswell .
Medieval warm period? how could you account for that and those were warmer days than now ? Other Warm period prior to this one?
In the prehistorical world before ice age temperatures were much much higher...
So whats the problem?
I do agree we need to get rid of oil and gass because it's not needed anymore. but not GW as a motive
razoorsharp 2 years ago
I agree with Al Gore on one issue: If you don't tell humanity that the world will end tomorrow, they won't do anything to stop it.
ElysiumFilms 2 years ago
@ElysiumFilms Yeah. That and betting that the majority of ppl are stupid.
Maybe warmer is good. However, it's end of May and only beginning to be hot here in CA, as opposed to March.
In any case, if we cant adapt, maybe that's one way to reduce population. We are a product of nature; lets nature works its course. Quit trying to control ppl.
MugenTJ 1 year ago
"Correlation between CO2 levels and GW does not mean causation." - That is the best point made in this climate change discussion I've heard to date.
On technological innovations, I am very intrigued by the possibilities of geothermo (if you've watched Zeitgeist: Addendum, you know what I'm talking about.
On a side note, I don't know where the rest of you are, but where I am, I'm experiencing the coolest summer ever in my life. Wonder what's up with that!
MuhammadVonRaven 2 years ago 2
Climate Change is caused by the Sun's activity..
Global warming is caused by Greedy politicians wanting to Tax us even more.
robertg222 2 years ago
mmmyeah, then again, CO2 is a consequence of warming, not a cause.
Those of you who think CO2 is a pollutant should refrain from exhaling.
Elasaltaculos 2 years ago
Could you please give me evidence for your statement?
At least in the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) the CO2-concentration wasn't very high. But according to your comment, there must have been more CO2 because it was very warm. Or do you even have an explanation for this?
InternetRevolution 2 years ago
watch?v=-zeGY8zbzc8&feature=channel_page
Elasaltaculos 2 years ago