I had one of these once - cost me $20 from a street vendor in NYC, but it only worked for 3 weeks so not good value for money. I would stay clear. ;-D
A watch like this goes with a good expensive car!--you can't have a watch like this and still live with your parents or drive a hyundai!-you just can't!
---or have small wrists! thats definitely a no-no!
I have the same watch.I bought it because everyone has sub,so I wanted smth different.If you want the best value for money,buy Rolex.You got in house mechanism,you got brand,quality and really beautiful,timeless watch.Sub and dweller are the best sport watches ever created.I´m not just die hard rolex fan,I respect Jaeger,Audemars,and love Panerai very much.All fantastic brands,but every watch lover has one Rolex at home.But I´d never ever buy or wear a gold Rolex.Period.
@crathorne1 You're* a rich bastard? Yet, you can't spell, form a grammatically correct sentence, or type? You're* a fucking idiot, with your Rolex that you don't own.
@Bossiiiii ummmm no, she still has it. i have more than enough money to go to college. and by the way, my mom bought one for my dad for his birthday 2 months ago
Another thing I like about this watch are the little touches like using white gold on the outline of the hour markers. That is something that sets Rolex apart. If it's not something you care about, there are less expensive watches out there. I love the look of an Omega on a NATO strap, for example.
@Blink180stu you pay for the name seiko watches are as if not more acurate and are just as good of a diving watch as this. i find rolex watches a total waste of money
@micallmighty - It's $6250 retail, but has been discontinued so some unauthorized dealers might try to charge more. There are still enough to go around where you should not have to pay a mark up, but those days are eventually going to end when inventories dwindle.
You should also consider the OMEGA Seamaster professional. It has a larger face and hands easier to read. Also has Helium escape valve and is quality made.The Omega also costs about 75% less.
Rolex should use Tritium for the luminescence as never dims.
I have owned one of these since 2003 and worn it every day , I'm a builder and wear it to work. its been very good. the first service cost £200 and the most recent service was £410 due to the fact it needed a new crown and crystal. rolex uk recomended a new strap but I thought £700 was a bit much. it is a good watch but doubt it is any better in the real world than a good seiko for a quarter of the price. I've been wearing it for 7 years and thats just my opinnion.
Very nice watch...! It resembles my Omega Seamaster 300 chronograph. I was wondering what is the specific model number of this watch? Again, Beautiful watch!
I bought one of these ,I had to decide between this and the Submariner ,but I liked the chunky feel of this watch .I didn't know about the bracelet extension until I saw this video ,so thanks for that .
No cyclops because of the already thick profile.....incorrect. There is no cyclops because a cyclops weakens the crystal and would be subject to cracking under extreme pressure.
Minor correction: The cyclops magnification would not be "correct" due to the thickness/ distance from the date window on the dial. The cyclops on Rolex watches is only glued to the crystal and has no bearing on the strength of the crystal itself.
You make this unwatchable because of all the Um and ahs. This is how stupid people talk. Why even bother making these videos if you can't conquer the english language. FUCK OFF and don't come back until you learn how to speak properly.
@beanoalbum that's not the correct explanation. A cyclops would only compromise the entire oyster case at extreme pressure. Sea Dweller acquired its 1200M depth rating thanks to the way it was designed, not for cosmetic reasons nor whims from uninformed wannabes that wouldn't even know how to work out Bühlmann decompression tables.
An all time classic which never will go out of style. And a very good investment too! I consider it way more elegant than the succeeding model the Deepsea.
Couldn't agree with you more on this! Personally, I think the new DeepSea is simply overkill. The original has been and will ALWAYS be the legendary watch for divers and has the record and history to match. GO SEA DWELLER!
Yes, this original SeaDweller will go down as one of Rolex's finest and most iconic sports watches. The new DeepSea is an amazing piece of engineering. However, its origin stems more from Rolex marketing than real need. 4,000 feet is plenty deep enough and most folks don't ever go below 1,000 feet, if that deep - ever. So what's the point in developing a 13,200 feet DeepSea? Simply overkill IMHO. Yes, this SeaDweller's place in Rolex's history will live on forever.
oil rig divers on platforms are some of the most highly paid people on earth. it's a really shitty job but they all wear and stand by these watches because of it's sturdiness and depth. plus it's tax deductible for them
I feel like such a dummy. I bought a rolex submariner with the bubble over the calendar. I saw James Bond wearing them all these years and had to have it.
I haven't gone so far as to buy a walther ppk, though. I buy American like the colt 45 ACP and smith & wesson 357 magnum.
I just took my Sea-Dweller to the shop to be serviced and it is going to cost £310! Certainly not cheap but it has been losing time and could do with a tune up.
I love my Sea-Dweller and now I'm going to be without it for approximately 8 weeks! I hope it comes back all shiny though.
maximusben1, SEIKO Diver's automatic watches, while not with Swiss movements, are quite accurate for the price. In fact, one can go to a watchsmith and tweak the SEIKO automatic movements to be nearly as close as Swiss COSC or even quartz accuracy!
So why pay zillions for a Swiss high-end, when a good looking SEIKO Diver's will do almost just as well! ;-)
The SD's second hand does stop when the crown is pulled into the "Hands Setting Position", but since that position is only reached if you pull the crown out ALL the way, the second hand does continue to run in the first two positions. The first position is called the "Hand Winding Position", and the second is the "Date Setting Position". If the crown is pulled out into these positions, the second hand still runs, it only stops in the third position, basically so you can sync exact time. Thanks.
I know your watches stand for tradition. I know your watches stand for quality. I know your watches stand for classic design. Damn..I know all that, but when in hell´s name will you make ACCURATE WATCHES??? At least you could invest some of the money we customers spend buying your watches in doing some research and development on more accurate movements...instead of wasting so much on progaganda and publicity.
i agree with you 100% , i have had to have mine adjusted twice now . hey if you want to buy a good dive watch that you can use and abuse buy a citizen or seiko . sorry rolex .
Mechanical watches are not bought for the fact that they keep perfect time, if you need that you get a quartz. My watch is +6 sec a day, inside the cosc standards. Do i care, no.
If you want an accurate watch, don't buy a mechanical movement. Even a 10$ timex is more accurate than the best of mechanical movements. For me, anything in -15 to + 15 seconds a day is acceptable, but of course, when I buy a COSC certified movement, I expect the -4/+6 a day...you buy a mechanical watch for the elegance, the essence of human ingenuity...not for precise timing...and Rolex by the way, are very precise as most of them of within COSC.
i bought a preowned breitling colt gmt at authorized dealer. very accurate gaining 1 second a day i'm too impressed. just purchased a rolex gmt master 2 i'm curious about the accuracy.
Nah, you're all wrong, the reason the Seadweller doesn't have a "date magnifier" has nothing to do with "profile" or "pressure under sea", but instead because if you put a date magnifier on a crystal that thick, the date becomes too magnified, and thus, warped beyond what Rolex was comfortable with allowing.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nice attempt at a watch review, but DUDE...SERIOUSLY be professional and STOP with the UMM & AHH's. HINT: practice your review FIRST before putting on video.
i think that rolexes are now getting a really expected look they don't sput different to me you see so ma watches with the same design personally i don't even like rolex gmt's and submariners they just looks a bit boring and annoying actually.
hunrb27, if you're so much against the oh so evil status symbol, why are you still recommending a 4 figure watch? Where does your status threshold begin exactly?
Truly a magnificent timepiece. I managed to get the last one in State College right before Christmas. Thank God because the new Deep-Sea is enormous in comparison and about $4,000 more.
No question its a classic watch, but a Seiko does the job just as well for under 200 bucks. ( the orange monster). The Rolex is strictly ego. Obviously, the case is vastly superior but .. its around five thousand dollars more than a Seiko or other similar Divers watch.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The SeaDweller is almost ten thousand dollars. What are you talking about?
A Seiko cannot dive as deep as a Rolex. An automatic Seiko watch lasts only about 1/5 the life time of a Rolex. Rolex is very robust and strong. It has very good shock absorption and anti-magnetic design. Rolex is class act. You must be a noob.
A seiko cant dive as deep as a Rolex but no human can either, A rolex will need a $500 service every 4-5 years. The Rolex is almost $10,000 you say, why is this, justify the price, you are getting ripped off just for the name. The movement inside the Rolex dosent even compare to some of Seiko's movements for less than half the price. You must be a noob.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I'm a noob?
SUCK MY DICK!
If you're a poor ass prick then don't come here talking shit about watches. We have money, that's why we decide to go upper-class, you don't have money, that's why you're having that sour grape attitude. Grow some balls
Your right, i could NEVER afford a Rolex, but if you think having money and buying a Rolex makes you upper class you are sorely mistaken. But with a reply like"Suck my dick" its obvious that you not 'upper class'.
wtf are you talking about its not because i can afford a submariner that i will be angry about people giving their opinion its not normal to have a rolex dude only rich people can afford one i can thank you because of my parents and i appreciate and DonMega, Rolex watches are perfect PERIOD
So you're saying that your expensive watch spends a lot of time in the repair shop while his Japanese watch ticks along day in & day out without missing a beat.
Maybe along time ago, now when you buy Swiss your paying for 'Swiss Made' on your watch, the Japanese make extremely high quality movement in their watches
Nice review. Just bought a SD myself. Unfortunately, brand new wasn't an option. These are becoming a lot more desirable as of late.
JoeNeanderthal 3 weeks ago
the best rolex
isep1707 1 month ago
Farowey... Tu sabes de Rolex lo mismo que yo se de transbordadores espaciales...
langeminerva 2 months ago
I had one of these once - cost me $20 from a street vendor in NYC, but it only worked for 3 weeks so not good value for money. I would stay clear. ;-D
matthewjsharpe 2 months ago
Ese no es un rolex original.
FAROWEY 2 months ago
A watch like this goes with a good expensive car!--you can't have a watch like this and still live with your parents or drive a hyundai!-you just can't!
---or have small wrists! thats definitely a no-no!
obaidCarkey 4 months ago
I have the same watch.I bought it because everyone has sub,so I wanted smth different.If you want the best value for money,buy Rolex.You got in house mechanism,you got brand,quality and really beautiful,timeless watch.Sub and dweller are the best sport watches ever created.I´m not just die hard rolex fan,I respect Jaeger,Audemars,and love Panerai very much.All fantastic brands,but every watch lover has one Rolex at home.But I´d never ever buy or wear a gold Rolex.Period.
1973833 5 months ago
That's a genuine one not a fake.
maximilianlindner 6 months ago
Sorry, this is not a fake. If there are no holes, it is a sea dweller built after 2003. i didnt know that.
thepokerfreak 6 months ago
This is a fake watch!
You can see it at 0:39 as he turns the watch. You cant see the holes, where the wristband is attached at the watchcase.
This watch is worth less than 10 Dollars.
thepokerfreak 6 months ago
Ihave seen and hold the watch in a store, and it is really stunning to see and feel it in person.
MysigFarbror 6 months ago
why is this shit sooooooooo shit
SasukeNathan 6 months ago
Great copy watch must have cost you a few hundred dollars
citic101 7 months ago
@citic101
Explain why you think it's fake...
@watchreport, great sea-dweller, obviously a real rolex
BAAAASJE 6 months ago
@causeofmyanger ! U got issues dude But your right that's why I've got 1 cuz I'm a rich bastard !!
crathorne1 8 months ago 7
@crathorne1 You're* a rich bastard? Yet, you can't spell, form a grammatically correct sentence, or type? You're* a fucking idiot, with your Rolex that you don't own.
DangerD205 4 months ago
@DangerD205 Command of the English language is not a prerequisite for owning a Rolex my friend.
ColonelAllan 4 months ago
@ColonelAllan
It completes the effect though.
jilloplo 4 months ago
@DangerD205 your a cock mate ! 1 word COCK !
crathorne1 3 months ago
ROLEX-MOST OVERPRICED WATCH IN THE WORLD.
ONLY RETARDED RICH BASTARDS BUY THIS CRAP
causeofmyanger 9 months ago
Lovely review. One of Rolexs' finest timepiece. Will never get rid of mine...ever! TRF newbies sucks!
solidpnoy 9 months ago
do you own all of these watches?
MegaSoccerluva 10 months ago
great review ....i am still considering between a Sub and the old Dweller...gotta make up my mind this year :)
MarcS4R 10 months ago
@MarcS4R had the same dilemma ...SD all the way ...getting mine this week ,)
ArenaOfTheAncients 8 months ago 2
fake Rolex!!!!!
300nem 11 months ago
@300nem you are an idiot, this watch is gen
JohnCBarleycorn 10 months ago
@300nem your brain is fake
ochaiba 10 months ago
very nice clock, I have the same ...
MrDavidferas 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HOGE KWALITEIT RELICA HORLOGES ROLEX!!
Alleen verzendingen in Nederland. En al in 10 dagen bij U thuis !
Bekijk mijn video en klik op de link in de beschrijving
watchparadiseNL 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HOGE KWALITEIT RELICA HORLOGES ROLEX!!
Alleen verzendingen in Nederland. En al in 10 dagen bij U thuis !
Bekijk mijn kanaal of ga naar watchparadisenl (punt ) tk
watchparadiseNL 11 months ago
Everybody says "it sits higher than other rolex blablabla" but nobody actually wears it on the reviews to show that.. Put it on the wrist, already!
zewill87 1 year ago
This is better than the typical sub date with cyclops.
opticbuyitnow 1 year ago
I want the octopus
apple4iphone 1 year ago
@apple4iphone
sommozzatori, now it's value 50.000€
amico1987 1 year ago
@amico1987 oh i heard 75.000 do u no to 1
apple4iphone 1 year ago
@apple4iphone I know those who would sell 1 or 2! interest?
amico1987 1 year ago
i have fake look kind like that but was grey !!!
AndrewsOpinion15 1 year ago
Very informative review.
veetour 1 year ago
Watch the fucking film!!!!
tygersofpantang 1 year ago
why doesnt this have a cyclops?
JamaciaMohn 1 year ago
great watch!
2011shark 1 year ago
very nice watch
TheIconPictures 1 year ago
Rolex Sea-Dweller, the nicest watch ever made.
Policestate2000 1 year ago
This watch looks almost identical to 007 Omega's planet ocean black on black.
damthatriver09 1 year ago
I had i rolex but i wiil never buy another one because i was stoole when i was going to give to my son yeah that was sad
JoaoBSK 1 year ago
@JoaoBSK Don't give up
damthatriver09 1 year ago
@JoaoBSK my mother got one for her birthday whn she was in highschool, it got stolen too. she just bought another one when she got married
sovietninja3 1 year ago
@sovietninja3 and when she had you.... she had to think of your college fund... so she sold it the first day when you were born...
Bossiiiii 1 year ago
@Bossiiiii ummmm no, she still has it. i have more than enough money to go to college. and by the way, my mom bought one for my dad for his birthday 2 months ago
sovietninja3 1 year ago
the milguass also has writing on the back
i3ooey 1 year ago
Another thing I like about this watch are the little touches like using white gold on the outline of the hour markers. That is something that sets Rolex apart. If it's not something you care about, there are less expensive watches out there. I love the look of an Omega on a NATO strap, for example.
1000diesel 1 year ago
Love my Dweller. Over 8 years in daily use and still looks great and keeps perfect time.
1000diesel 1 year ago
@1000diesel Do you get approached by people in the street about it?
damthatriver09 1 year ago
@mrdominc Thanks a lot. I bought a pre-owned one a couple of weeks ago. I paid £2000.
micallmighty 1 year ago
ask ur self is it worth 7 grand
Blink180stu 1 year ago
@Blink180stu you pay for the name seiko watches are as if not more acurate and are just as good of a diving watch as this. i find rolex watches a total waste of money
medusa1931 1 year ago
@medusa1931 its just rich consumer whores that are willing to buy one of these things although i have to say the watch does look pretty cool
Blink180stu 1 year ago
@Blink180stu or people who like watches and like good watches, but can also afford them
sovietninja3 1 year ago
@medusa1931 I'm sorry, did you write something? I stopped reading after about 3 words, due to you being a FUCKING MORON.
absoftitanium 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@medusa1931 are you being fucking serious?
sovietninja3 1 year ago
@Blink180stu only if u can afford it. lol you're poor
sovietninja3 1 year ago
Does anybody know the retail price of this watch?
micallmighty 1 year ago
@micallmighty it retails for £5339.
mrdominc 1 year ago
@micallmighty - It's $6250 retail, but has been discontinued so some unauthorized dealers might try to charge more. There are still enough to go around where you should not have to pay a mark up, but those days are eventually going to end when inventories dwindle.
1000diesel 1 year ago
Beautiful watch but why does Rolex feel it's necessary to write a paragraph on its dials? They should take some lessons from Sinn watches.
vallmak 1 year ago
You should also consider the OMEGA Seamaster professional. It has a larger face and hands easier to read. Also has Helium escape valve and is quality made.The Omega also costs about 75% less.
Rolex should use Tritium for the luminescence as never dims.
allclassics 1 year ago
Yeah buddy, we get what "black on black" means. You don't have to point out the black bezel and black dial.
masmddds 1 year ago
Comment removed
Black0bi 1 year ago
nice
hopeswhell1 1 year ago
Makes my Omega look like a timex
Draker73 1 year ago
If you get tired of that watch, I can give it a nice home ;)
ingareinar007 1 year ago
I'm currently wearing a 30 year old Oyster.. My fathers.. love the review dude
reflex0r 1 year ago
Wheres the magnifer
Dante2008Allen 1 year ago
@Dante2008Allen No magnifier on a Sea Dweller because the crystal is too thick - a magnifier wouldnt work.
RebelKnightCSA 1 year ago
I have the fake version to this. it works pretty well
techking00107 1 year ago
I have owned one of these since 2003 and worn it every day , I'm a builder and wear it to work. its been very good. the first service cost £200 and the most recent service was £410 due to the fact it needed a new crown and crystal. rolex uk recomended a new strap but I thought £700 was a bit much. it is a good watch but doubt it is any better in the real world than a good seiko for a quarter of the price. I've been wearing it for 7 years and thats just my opinnion.
aa209999 1 year ago
hi
i have this one but his age like 35
excellent condition no scratch or something like that
i wonder how much it can cost?
lironlww 1 year ago
torn between this and the breitling seawolf ti? whats your opinion?
slockwood1 1 year ago
Very nice watch...! It resembles my Omega Seamaster 300 chronograph. I was wondering what is the specific model number of this watch? Again, Beautiful watch!
ronsse1 1 year ago
ive got a 2009 v serial model , last of a few made for uk market , best thing ive ever owned !!!!!!!!
garycotton1 1 year ago
This is the only watch I own... I'll be getting mine PVD black coated in a year.
FTWCM 1 year ago
i owned one great solid watch
keefy99999 2 years ago
I bought one of these ,I had to decide between this and the Submariner ,but I liked the chunky feel of this watch .I didn't know about the bracelet extension until I saw this video ,so thanks for that .
ScrappyPoontachat 2 years ago
No cyclops because of the already thick profile.....incorrect. There is no cyclops because a cyclops weakens the crystal and would be subject to cracking under extreme pressure.
hhhh0007 2 years ago
Minor correction: The cyclops magnification would not be "correct" due to the thickness/ distance from the date window on the dial. The cyclops on Rolex watches is only glued to the crystal and has no bearing on the strength of the crystal itself.
LED98 2 years ago
Watches always attracts me
oliverhoward951 2 years ago
How do you judge watches?
diornotwar123 2 years ago
How accurate are these? (+/- secs)
MrFrankBullitt 2 years ago
M Serial here....never parting with it.
elfling 2 years ago
Rolex Sea-Dweller the one and only
johntorcasio 2 years ago 17
@johntorcasio shit thing
SasukeNathan 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
boring and plain Rolex almost to clean.
not the nicest rolex.
TheMikesyd 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I prefer my Raymond Weil Freelancer!!!
gorilaelvis 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Take it from flatwatal1 he-shes got a point Ums and Rs your making do get on ones tits so take heed and do FUCK OFF YA SOUND LIKE A NONCE
BONNYJONNY17 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You make this unwatchable because of all the Um and ahs. This is how stupid people talk. Why even bother making these videos if you can't conquer the english language. FUCK OFF and don't come back until you learn how to speak properly.
flatpat1 2 years ago
You're clearly an ass.
MaggotBrain10 2 years ago
Comment removed
beanoalbum 2 years ago 9
@beanoalbum that's not the correct explanation. A cyclops would only compromise the entire oyster case at extreme pressure. Sea Dweller acquired its 1200M depth rating thanks to the way it was designed, not for cosmetic reasons nor whims from uninformed wannabes that wouldn't even know how to work out Bühlmann decompression tables.
elfling 1 year ago
so do all rolex have sapphire fronts or just this one?
swedhockey0394 2 years ago
yeah they all have sapphire crystals now - older ones used to have a plastic crystal.
thomasnewman8 2 years ago
thanks
swedhockey0394 2 years ago
An all time classic which never will go out of style. And a very good investment too! I consider it way more elegant than the succeeding model the Deepsea.
kollomollo 2 years ago 3
Couldn't agree with you more on this! Personally, I think the new DeepSea is simply overkill. The original has been and will ALWAYS be the legendary watch for divers and has the record and history to match. GO SEA DWELLER!
dinan545bmw 2 years ago
I agree; I think that the big watch craze will go out of style in a few years.
textthing 2 years ago
Yes, this original SeaDweller will go down as one of Rolex's finest and most iconic sports watches. The new DeepSea is an amazing piece of engineering. However, its origin stems more from Rolex marketing than real need. 4,000 feet is plenty deep enough and most folks don't ever go below 1,000 feet, if that deep - ever. So what's the point in developing a 13,200 feet DeepSea? Simply overkill IMHO. Yes, this SeaDweller's place in Rolex's history will live on forever.
dinan545bmw 2 years ago 3
@dinan545bmw
oil rig divers on platforms are some of the most highly paid people on earth. it's a really shitty job but they all wear and stand by these watches because of it's sturdiness and depth. plus it's tax deductible for them
adipuppi 6 months ago
i like it.
PayAttentionPro 2 years ago 2
I feel like such a dummy. I bought a rolex submariner with the bubble over the calendar. I saw James Bond wearing them all these years and had to have it.
I haven't gone so far as to buy a walther ppk, though. I buy American like the colt 45 ACP and smith & wesson 357 magnum.
WilliamRowlett 2 years ago
You aint Bond if you aint sporting the PPK...;D
CobraVerde601 2 years ago
...look up a seiko spring drive. much more accurate than a rolex. the second hand is so fluid, it makes the rolex look like its ticking!
=) i like omega better haha!
tkorulesdaworld 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
expensive ugly stuff . Hamilton rules
Scyllllla 2 years ago
This watch is absolutley beautiful !
gilamonster001 2 years ago 22
@gilamonster001 its shit i make better shit out of my ass.
SasukeNathan 6 months ago
Comment removed
ricta856 2 years ago
I love this Sea Dweller.. Its cool.. I have about 20 pcs of sport rolex sport... The model and accurancy is great.. share..man
macusjfox 2 years ago
I just took my Sea-Dweller to the shop to be serviced and it is going to cost £310! Certainly not cheap but it has been losing time and could do with a tune up.
I love my Sea-Dweller and now I'm going to be without it for approximately 8 weeks! I hope it comes back all shiny though.
FireEyes69 2 years ago
maximusben1, SEIKO Diver's automatic watches, while not with Swiss movements, are quite accurate for the price. In fact, one can go to a watchsmith and tweak the SEIKO automatic movements to be nearly as close as Swiss COSC or even quartz accuracy!
So why pay zillions for a Swiss high-end, when a good looking SEIKO Diver's will do almost just as well! ;-)
NiallatUTube 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thats not a original ROLEX its a fake !!!!
EnayiKus 2 years ago
And how would you know???
stuprestonexperience 2 years ago
cause when you unscrew the crown the seconds should stop.
vasilis72 2 years ago
The SD's second hand does stop when the crown is pulled into the "Hands Setting Position", but since that position is only reached if you pull the crown out ALL the way, the second hand does continue to run in the first two positions. The first position is called the "Hand Winding Position", and the second is the "Date Setting Position". If the crown is pulled out into these positions, the second hand still runs, it only stops in the third position, basically so you can sync exact time. Thanks.
prowatchreview 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice Folex!!!
Sniperman1964 2 years ago
how much u pay?
narutogx3 2 years ago
Is that a replica watch or genuine watch.....?
Paccorie 2 years ago
This is genuine. I know.
SonyForLife 2 years ago
Rolex Sea Dweller is a piece of high engeenering., much better than Submariner and Deepsea.
fcaceres06 2 years ago
good review - definitely better than the Submariner
ProfessionalWatches 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Currently is a work of art, of the Shroud of Turin, in german ebay, in full size.
The auction ends on the 31st of May 09.
Ebay item number (Germany): 140321366168
Very nice art!!!
jesusstarlight77 2 years ago
Wat een gelul !!
Schout1979 2 years ago
Rivendita Repliche Rolex Svizzere della migliore qualità presenti sul mercato. Identici in tutto e per tutto agli originali!
Per info o acquisti visita il negozio: w w w . replicherolex . c o m
sollozzos 2 years ago
Dear Rolex Company,
I know your watches stand for tradition. I know your watches stand for quality. I know your watches stand for classic design. Damn..I know all that, but when in hell´s name will you make ACCURATE WATCHES??? At least you could invest some of the money we customers spend buying your watches in doing some research and development on more accurate movements...instead of wasting so much on progaganda and publicity.
That´s all. Best regards
DuncanLafayette 2 years ago 2
i agree with you 100% , i have had to have mine adjusted twice now . hey if you want to buy a good dive watch that you can use and abuse buy a citizen or seiko . sorry rolex .
leecoleman 2 years ago
Mechanical watches are not bought for the fact that they keep perfect time, if you need that you get a quartz. My watch is +6 sec a day, inside the cosc standards. Do i care, no.
sefilm01 2 years ago
If you want an accurate watch, don't buy a mechanical movement. Even a 10$ timex is more accurate than the best of mechanical movements. For me, anything in -15 to + 15 seconds a day is acceptable, but of course, when I buy a COSC certified movement, I expect the -4/+6 a day...you buy a mechanical watch for the elegance, the essence of human ingenuity...not for precise timing...and Rolex by the way, are very precise as most of them of within COSC.
maximusben1 2 years ago
i bought a preowned breitling colt gmt at authorized dealer. very accurate gaining 1 second a day i'm too impressed. just purchased a rolex gmt master 2 i'm curious about the accuracy.
englishbeat720 2 years ago
How much did you pay for the colt gmt?
braggan 2 years ago
It was a good deal suggestion price about $2895 but i paid $1550 tax included.
englishbeat720 2 years ago
Nah, you're all wrong, the reason the Seadweller doesn't have a "date magnifier" has nothing to do with "profile" or "pressure under sea", but instead because if you put a date magnifier on a crystal that thick, the date becomes too magnified, and thus, warped beyond what Rolex was comfortable with allowing.
Sheesh, I swear, watch knowledge is a dying art.
GRAFHC 2 years ago
I agree trev ,they are very basic and overpriced. They are great watches thou, just very unconvenient.
hunrb27 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nice attempt at a watch review, but DUDE...SERIOUSLY be professional and STOP with the UMM & AHH's. HINT: practice your review FIRST before putting on video.
You ruined your own review.
flatpat 2 years ago
not a fashion accsessory? yea it is, its pure pimping!
ph1lo 2 years ago
Excellent!
Yeah, if you get a deep sea, PLEASE do a review!
auxmike 2 years ago
can u please tell me what cost ?
thebassoflove9 2 years ago
Rolex Basement Dweller next?
Quex01 2 years ago
Nice watch but not worth the 4 or 5 grand in my book.
Monito1971 2 years ago
i think that rolexes are now getting a really expected look they don't sput different to me you see so ma watches with the same design personally i don't even like rolex gmt's and submariners they just looks a bit boring and annoying actually.
trevskiw2008 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
my ears r bleeding ARGH ARGGH THIS IS THE VIDEO FROM HELL FUCK YOU ARRRRRRRGH
nisamneznam 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this watch is so gay i like pattik phillipe
nahianxx 2 years ago
of course they are. it's a mass produced watch that commands a high retail. Rolex will gladly sell you one.
pokermon919 2 years ago
you understand that rolex stopped producing these a while back? right?
but perhaps you've seen one at an AD?
Justfilloutthe111111 2 years ago
Are these still available at AD's?
Justfilloutthe111111 2 years ago
This is a classic Rolex tool watch unlike the so-called "Deep Sea", which is too big and too much of a fashion watch.
Wellpinit 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Status symbol, nothing more. Get a tag, omega, or invicta.
hunrb27 2 years ago
Yeah Rolexes do seem to be status symbols these days but you can't deny the fact that this is one awesome watch?
MrPlanetOcean 2 years ago 2
Are you serious? Invicta's are crap.
coolmaster101 2 years ago
hunrb27, if you're so much against the oh so evil status symbol, why are you still recommending a 4 figure watch? Where does your status threshold begin exactly?
enemymouse 2 years ago
Tag Heuer and Breitling are the best_
VivaLaFina 2 years ago
Thanks for taking the time to review this, much appreciated.
fileman40 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i think the fake watch is good also.we did buy something of that.they are very nice!for example from watchgo
watchgo001 2 years ago
fake watch is for fake people....like you hahhaa
ballards06 2 years ago
Great review, actually all your reviews are really well explained and easy to understand, thank you
JiroKobashi 2 years ago 7
Great watch - nice review!
I love those "None-Cyclops-Models" like SeaDweller-116660, Daytona-4130 or Submariner-3130 with a pure symmetric dial/clockface. Awesome!
oysterperpetualizer 2 years ago 2
"This is not a fashion accessory"....but it IS!!!!
radicaledward40 2 years ago
Truly a magnificent timepiece. I managed to get the last one in State College right before Christmas. Thank God because the new Deep-Sea is enormous in comparison and about $4,000 more.
RSSUX 3 years ago
it's true, its much more of a functional tool than something you can wear with anything like the older one.
lowfiwhiteguy 2 years ago
No question its a classic watch, but a Seiko does the job just as well for under 200 bucks. ( the orange monster). The Rolex is strictly ego. Obviously, the case is vastly superior but .. its around five thousand dollars more than a Seiko or other similar Divers watch.
747Boeing400 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The SeaDweller is almost ten thousand dollars. What are you talking about?
A Seiko cannot dive as deep as a Rolex. An automatic Seiko watch lasts only about 1/5 the life time of a Rolex. Rolex is very robust and strong. It has very good shock absorption and anti-magnetic design. Rolex is class act. You must be a noob.
randompop101 3 years ago
A seiko cant dive as deep as a Rolex but no human can either, A rolex will need a $500 service every 4-5 years. The Rolex is almost $10,000 you say, why is this, justify the price, you are getting ripped off just for the name. The movement inside the Rolex dosent even compare to some of Seiko's movements for less than half the price. You must be a noob.
donmega4 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm a noob?
SUCK MY DICK!
If you're a poor ass prick then don't come here talking shit about watches. We have money, that's why we decide to go upper-class, you don't have money, that's why you're having that sour grape attitude. Grow some balls
randompop101 2 years ago
Your right, i could NEVER afford a Rolex, but if you think having money and buying a Rolex makes you upper class you are sorely mistaken. But with a reply like"Suck my dick" its obvious that you not 'upper class'.
donmega4 2 years ago 6
wtf are you talking about its not because i can afford a submariner that i will be angry about people giving their opinion its not normal to have a rolex dude only rich people can afford one i can thank you because of my parents and i appreciate and DonMega, Rolex watches are perfect PERIOD
Charles55559 2 years ago
you cant compare a mercedez benz car to a toyota car...meaning seiko is for poor people like you hahahha
ballards06 2 years ago
you obviously dont know alot about watches lol
donmega4 2 years ago
i own one stupid...lol
ballards06 2 years ago
own a what?
donmega4 2 years ago
So you're saying that your expensive watch spends a lot of time in the repair shop while his Japanese watch ticks along day in & day out without missing a beat.
roughrider119 2 years ago
duh? what are you talking about? swiss watches are the best ,japanese is only known for their cars...
ballards06 2 years ago
Maybe along time ago, now when you buy Swiss your paying for 'Swiss Made' on your watch, the Japanese make extremely high quality movement in their watches
donmega4 2 years ago
Seiko make watches that sell for 6 figures!
donmega4 2 years ago 4