Interesting topic. I just wanted to point out that CDEFGABC(do re mi fa sol la si do) is a Major scale, not a whole-tone scale as you call it. A whole tone scale would be C D E F# G# A#(Bb) C Whereas a Major scale contains 2 half steps 1)between E and F 2)between B and C. Thanks.
When you watch the 528 videos and look at the links you find 10x the amount of wordy manipulation (saying love, revolution, "powers that be", nazis-nazis-nazis, and healing 528 times) and complete lack of real data backed by that awkward online peer pressure that is a million people acting as if it is common knowledge. Not that I have looked everywhere and I might be wrong. I personally however, have had a better intellectual and emotional experience with 432. Thank you.
Thanks Jamie, this is excellent research and I am going to mirror it with your permisson, because of it's importance in teaching Russellian Sceince. Many Blessings Robert
Music needs to stay free for exploration and expression, not regulated. I commend you for looking into musical harmonies, numbers and all of their synchronistic relationships to our human and spiritual experience, and for sharing it. When you make blatantly false statements (like some numbers are not frequencies), in my mind you lose credibility and sound like you have a hidden agenda or battle to win.
@musictecture I have to disagree with you when you say "everything" is frequency. If this were true then there could be no musical instruments and thus no vibration. You have to have "nodes" in order to have vibration...You have to have still point around which vibration (frequency) can move. If you don't have the "nodes" that hold a guitar string, or the nodes that set the holes on a flute, you cannot have sound. The nodal structure - 1,7,4...2,8,5...3,9,6 - is the blueprint
Twice in here you say that what we're referring to as "solfeggio frequencies" are "NOT frequencies". Are people fooled by that?!!! Every number is a frequency!!! Everything in existence has a unique frequency. I understand we're talking about harmony here, and we all like the idea of being in tune with the cosmos.
I just mixed down a song using the chakra tones has a hz guide. Massive improvement to my music. I will be using them and most harmonic numbers on mixs downs from now on :)
@XIIXCECXIIX I hate to have to take time to answer ignorant questions but you obviously have no idea what Pythagorean tuning is. You are correct that the Ab and G# are the same note in EQUAL TEMPERAMENT tuning like what is needed for a piano but Pythagorean tuning is not equal temperament but "Just Intonation" which causes the Ab and the G# to be slightly different because the circle of fifths doesn't resolve perfectly to the next octave. I'm not even going to address the rest of your nonsense.
@jamiebuturff referring to the Pythag. comma, doesn't change that fact your chart is flawed, and Ab is not the augmented 4th of A (but the major 7th). Run along and fix your mistake.
Do not you know that F sharp is higher than G flat when playing the violin - all at all sharp tones are higher than flat. The piano is very false instrument. I play violin and piano since age 7 and my conscious life has gone on stage, and I know what I'm talking about.
@XIIXCECXIIX Tell this to a professional violin player, I am sure he/she disagrees with you. I also want to point out that the piano is flawed since it cannot be properly and is therefore always false. At least, according to Pythagoras. Didnt they teach you that at the conservatory?
honestly, 432 squared is the speed of light? only if you use miles (and much of the world doesn't - we use kilometers)
The unit of a second is just as arbitrary - it doesn't have to be 60/minute, it can be 50 or 72 (same goes for the minute), so the frequency of 432hz is really just an arbitrary number assigned to that pitch - the number doesn't really have anything to do with the actual pitch.
And what's up with pythagorean tuning? no one uses that, unless you're playing medieval music.
@jamiebuturff I do believe that A 432 is better than A 440 for tuning, so i don't disagree with you there. Anyway, FluffyBunniesOnFire is right - why is the length of a second cosmically fundamental? The babyloninans divided hours and minutes into 60/60 for astrological reasons, but it's really quite arbitary, and you can really define a second in any way that's reasonable.
@cangjie12 The Babylonians were given sacred knowledge by the "gods" who visited them. If you ever read the books by Zecharia Sitchin you will know why they used a base 60 counting system. Tesla, the father of AC electricity used 60 cycles per second. There are many more reasons why the 60 is used today and has been used by the Ancients and I feel VERY confident that the measure of today's second is far from arbitrary. It only appears that way to some.
"Most Harmonic Numbers" refers to ratio components, not Hertz. You seem so interested in numbers that you overlook they're multiplied by units. A Hertz is the reciprocal of a second, so in order for any of these frequencies to be significant as integer values without decimal points you have to explain why the length of a second is a cosmically fundamental, rather than an arbitrary measuring convention. You also say that 186624 is close to the speed of light, but neglect to tell us in which units
@FluffyBunniesOnFire The units of the 186,624 is nautical mile per second. A nautical mile is a unit of length corresponding approximately to one minute of arc of latitude along any meridian and was determined to be approximately 6,076 feet. Now I contend that it should be 6144 nautical feet. This would put 6114 as a G on the Most Harmonic Numbers while the 186,624 is an F#. On the chart the two are separated by 3 spaces up and 5 spaces over or a 3:5 ratio. This is a Fibonacci ratio.
These family number groups make a pointless numerology game that only works in base 10, which has no basis in nature.
The Pythagorean intervals are merely the family of just intonations whose ratio components can have prime factors no higher than 3. It doesn't even support the 5/4 ratio of a maj3, but rather 81/64, so it takes many more subharmonic cycles before it synchronizes as a harmony.
The Pythagorean intervals are merely the family of just intonations whose ratio components can have prime factors no higher than 3. It doesn't even support the 5/4 ratio of a maj3, but rather 81/64, so it takes many more subharmonic cycles before it synchronizes as a harmony.
How would the velocity of light in modern day miles be accounted for by this method, being that Pythagoras knew nothing of our measurment of the mile? The Cosmic 432 is woven through everything? How is it that different forms of measuring all seem to work together both past and modern systems and come up with the same numbers? Back to the bible again oy vey! Can't we do this without false religions and their mind control agendas and numerology/pyramidology styled proofs which have all failed?
sorry, but, around 7:30, when talking about "The fingerprint of god" diagram, you state that moving from the five to the one, 5 and 5 make 10, but it's actually that 32 (which make the five) doubles to become 64, which is one. Just a mistake, no big deal
what happens when u put 432 hz into a rodin coil? anything special?and does winding b match harmonics? just a thought since the 396 is for modulation of the doubling circuit.
All this makes me wonder how this ties in to Ed Leedskalnin and if there is any clues with his "sweet 16" and the two numbers left on the castle - 7129 & 6105195. Since the only eye witnesses of his abilities was a few teenage boys that claimed they saw him singing to the stones, I am sure there is a significant connection.
Also on a side note. Its too bad that DrLenHorowitz has not returned. Sometimes truth can easily be displayed by someones willingness to debate information while not involving the ego. I was looking forward to what he had to say about the other... set of numbers
I will post any video response from you Len. Let's bring this debate out to the people with facts. I have just presented mine, with a few more for Part 3. Thank you for joining. I look forward to hearing from you!
I worked with Dr. Puleo for several years. He never once mentioned 432Hz to me, but 528 many times. Nor am I aware that Marko Rodin has anything more positive to say about 432Hz than 528Hz, since Rodin confirmed, in my presence, Dr. Puleo's revelation that 528 is part of his Infinity Pattern (Signature of God) found in his matrix of universal construction. I LOVE 432Hz for all the reasons stated in this clip, but without 528Hz, my heart would not know LOVE, the heart of creation and the Creator.
@DrLenHorowitz Hi Len, it's great to finally have you involved in this debate. Thank you for joining. Yes, I know Marko Rodin confirmed to you over the phone that the 528 was part of the infinity pattern, because it is. But Marko also told you that you, "Don't know what you are talking about..." when you claimed that the 528 was an actual frequency. Further, you have propagated all over the Internet that the 528Hz frequency is used to repair DNA. Name one who will admit this publicly.
432Hz is a wonderful healing frequency, HOWEVER, to claim that 528 is out of the Pythagorean Matrix is VERY misleading. 528 is at the heart of EVERYTHING including the "Pythagorean Comma"--also known as the "Pythagorean Crisis"--cited by McClain. Pi, Phi, and Fibonacci series depends on 528, as does 5280 ft/mile,. It is false to claim 512 is close enough to 528 to have phase-locking (i.e., coherence), for healing. I highly recommend you redo this video to reflect the greater truth.
@DrLenHorowitz The Pythagorean comma is not a single frequency but is a group of frequencies. Our music today is in equal temperament, which means the Pythagorean circle of 5ths doesn't resolve to the next higher octave (because Nature is an Infinity) so we sharpen the notes up and flatten them going down from middle C. The 528 is at the heart of everything just like the 174 and 396 are at the heart. The 432Hz (and PHI) is the vibrational frequency that links them all together.
I wanted to suggest the ABRAHADABRA forums too. I am overwhelmed by the information on that website though, so I havn't gone that deep yet. Thanks again, just wanted to share some stuff and see what you thought. I anxiously await more videos from you.
Also, check out The Template videos. Its a 3 part series that you may resonate with. The theme of the video is sacred geometry and how it relates to the human being. The video itself is presented more poetically instead of mathematically though. Regardless, its probably my favorite series of all time. Also check out the series about DNA and implosion by Dan Winter. Really interesting stuff relating to fractal implosion and bliss through the golden ratio in the dodecahedron.
Thank you for this amazing video! That is no understatement. Although I recently purchased a set of chakra tuning forks. One of them is the Heart chakra which is tuned to 136.10 HZ. I don't see any logical pattern for how these are tuned other than the idea of them being an octave of the planets. Do you know how these frequencies relate to the work you are doing, or if they are correct? the 136.10 is supposed to be in tune with the cosmic OM as well.
@Indigozek Using the 432Hz as the standard pitch with Pythagorean tuning the 136 would be a C# (136.68Hz). According to my research the cosmic OM is the vibration and the Sri Yantra is the geometric equivalent. The oldest Sri Yantra we know of is found at Mt. Meru where there are 432 Buddha statues and 72 stupas. I'm pretty sure the builders were trying to tell us something.
@jamiebuturff Ok, I am doing my best to understand. I have researched this, and watched the video about 10 times and I just don't get it. How are the chakra frequencies derived from 432? What I don't understand is, if 432hz is the "middle" or 'base" pitch to derive other frequencies from. How do we get 128hz, 256hz from 432? Also, how does 136.10 relate to 432? Why is 136.10 the frequency of the heart chakra, yet this chart indicates 128 or 256? How are the solfeggio and chakras related?
@Indigozek Also, you are not obligated to answer these questions, but I have been trying to understand the musical piece of the puzzle for a long time. I may just need to dig deeper into music theory or take a class.
@Indigozek The chakra frequencies came from a Tibetan chakra bowl CD by Ben Scott and Christa Mitchell. It just so happens that all of the frequencies of the bowls are tuned to 432Hz using Pythagorean tuning. For example, we get the 128Hz (the note of C one octave below middle C) by taking the 108, or two octaves below the 432 and multiplying it by 1.18518 (see chart in movie) using Pythagorean tuning making it a Minor Third of the note of A.
@jamiebuturff Alright, thank you for clarifying. The only other thing i'm wondering is why there is a difference with tuning forks. Why not tune the Heart fork frequency to 128 instead of 136.10? How do these frequencies, 136.10 (heart), 172.06 (crown) etc relate to 432 and its respective octaves?
@Indigozek You will have to ask the people who made your tuning forks how they arrived at the frequencies they did. As for researching how the 136 and 172 relate to the 432 you have all the tools you need in the above video. Good luck and thanks for watching!
@Indigozek I don't know where you got your chakra tuning forks from but I bet they might have an answer to why they made them the way they did. The 136Hz is a C# and not a C. The 172Hz is an F.
@jamiebuturff Yeah its really frustrating. They are basically the frequencies of the planets rotations, which relate to the chakras from what I understand. These frequencies are used on a few different websites, yet there are no mathematical proofs that I can find. I really need to learn this stuff myself so I can figure out the truth.
@Indigozek The chakra frequencies are from Tibetan monks' hand-made chakra bowls. I put my tuner up to the speaker and all of them are tuned to Pythagorean intervals of the 432Hz. Your reference to"...the frequencies of the planets rotations..." is what Pythagoras called The Music of the Spheres. The 2 frequencies you mentioned - 136 and 172 - are tuned to Pythagorean intervals of the 432 as well. But I'm going to trust the Tibetan monks about the veracity of the chakra frequencies.
@jamiebuturff Great information. Thank you. Also, I agree about the monks. Maybe both sets have benefits, yet if I truly want to bring my chakras into resonance, i'll buy the other one.
@Indigozek To get the 256Hz you can either multiply it by 2 since its one octave up or you can take the next octave up from the 108, which is 216, and multiply 216 x 1.18518 (a minor third) and get the same frequency.
Interesting topic. I just wanted to point out that CDEFGABC(do re mi fa sol la si do) is a Major scale, not a whole-tone scale as you call it. A whole tone scale would be C D E F# G# A#(Bb) C Whereas a Major scale contains 2 half steps 1)between E and F 2)between B and C. Thanks.
UnitedEffect 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When you watch the 528 videos and look at the links you find 10x the amount of wordy manipulation (saying love, revolution, "powers that be", nazis-nazis-nazis, and healing 528 times) and complete lack of real data backed by that awkward online peer pressure that is a million people acting as if it is common knowledge. Not that I have looked everywhere and I might be wrong. I personally however, have had a better intellectual and emotional experience with 432. Thank you.
JSMVI 1 month ago
Comment removed
JSMVI 1 month ago
Thanks Jamie, this is excellent research and I am going to mirror it with your permisson, because of it's importance in teaching Russellian Sceince. Many Blessings Robert
77GSlinger 2 months ago
Music needs to stay free for exploration and expression, not regulated. I commend you for looking into musical harmonies, numbers and all of their synchronistic relationships to our human and spiritual experience, and for sharing it. When you make blatantly false statements (like some numbers are not frequencies), in my mind you lose credibility and sound like you have a hidden agenda or battle to win.
musictecture 3 months ago in playlist 432 Hz - Jamie Buturff videos
@musictecture I have to disagree with you when you say "everything" is frequency. If this were true then there could be no musical instruments and thus no vibration. You have to have "nodes" in order to have vibration...You have to have still point around which vibration (frequency) can move. If you don't have the "nodes" that hold a guitar string, or the nodes that set the holes on a flute, you cannot have sound. The nodal structure - 1,7,4...2,8,5...3,9,6 - is the blueprint
jamiebuturff 4 weeks ago
Twice in here you say that what we're referring to as "solfeggio frequencies" are "NOT frequencies". Are people fooled by that?!!! Every number is a frequency!!! Everything in existence has a unique frequency. I understand we're talking about harmony here, and we all like the idea of being in tune with the cosmos.
musictecture 3 months ago in playlist 432 Hz - Jamie Buturff videos
I just mixed down a song using the chakra tones has a hz guide. Massive improvement to my music. I will be using them and most harmonic numbers on mixs downs from now on :)
marta1983able 3 months ago
so... all these coincidences are interesting... but what do they signify? i guess i just don't get it.
mjhenkel1984 5 months ago
Was the music in this video tuned to 432?
marswalker195 6 months ago in playlist 432 Hz - Jamie Buturff videos 3
Your chart 'Pythagorean Tuning' from your website is MASSIVELY FLAWED.
First, Ab and G# are THE SAME NOTES. Google enharmonic spelling.
Second, Ab (which is also G#) is not the augmented 4th of A, it is the MAJOR 7th. - Eb is the augmented fourth of A, the TRITONE.
Thrid, there are 12 chromatic musical notes, not 13.
In my opinion as an accomplished Jazz pianist, this a FAIL!!
I like 432 tuning, but don't try to discredit Dr. Horowitz when your data has massive obvious errors in it.
XIIXCECXIIX 6 months ago 2
@XIIXCECXIIX I hate to have to take time to answer ignorant questions but you obviously have no idea what Pythagorean tuning is. You are correct that the Ab and G# are the same note in EQUAL TEMPERAMENT tuning like what is needed for a piano but Pythagorean tuning is not equal temperament but "Just Intonation" which causes the Ab and the G# to be slightly different because the circle of fifths doesn't resolve perfectly to the next octave. I'm not even going to address the rest of your nonsense.
jamiebuturff 6 months ago 6
@jamiebuturff referring to the Pythag. comma, doesn't change that fact your chart is flawed, and Ab is not the augmented 4th of A (but the major 7th). Run along and fix your mistake.
XIIXCECXIIX 6 months ago 6
@jamiebuturff LOL. PWNED! Pythagoras would be proud.
TheYarro 1 month ago
@XIIXCECXIIX
Do not you know that F sharp is higher than G flat when playing the violin - all at all sharp tones are higher than flat. The piano is very false instrument. I play violin and piano since age 7 and my conscious life has gone on stage, and I know what I'm talking about.
karutzar 5 months ago
@XIIXCECXIIX Tell this to a professional violin player, I am sure he/she disagrees with you. I also want to point out that the piano is flawed since it cannot be properly and is therefore always false. At least, according to Pythagoras. Didnt they teach you that at the conservatory?
riojimatsuoka 1 month ago
honestly, 432 squared is the speed of light? only if you use miles (and much of the world doesn't - we use kilometers)
The unit of a second is just as arbitrary - it doesn't have to be 60/minute, it can be 50 or 72 (same goes for the minute), so the frequency of 432hz is really just an arbitrary number assigned to that pitch - the number doesn't really have anything to do with the actual pitch.
And what's up with pythagorean tuning? no one uses that, unless you're playing medieval music.
cangjie12 7 months ago
@cangjie12 I can't even begin to bring you up to speed with your current level of thinking and education. Best of luck to you.
jamiebuturff 7 months ago
@jamiebuturff I do believe that A 432 is better than A 440 for tuning, so i don't disagree with you there. Anyway, FluffyBunniesOnFire is right - why is the length of a second cosmically fundamental? The babyloninans divided hours and minutes into 60/60 for astrological reasons, but it's really quite arbitary, and you can really define a second in any way that's reasonable.
cangjie12 7 months ago
@cangjie12 The Babylonians were given sacred knowledge by the "gods" who visited them. If you ever read the books by Zecharia Sitchin you will know why they used a base 60 counting system. Tesla, the father of AC electricity used 60 cycles per second. There are many more reasons why the 60 is used today and has been used by the Ancients and I feel VERY confident that the measure of today's second is far from arbitrary. It only appears that way to some.
jamiebuturff 7 months ago
and at 5:49 you are wrong again.
The whole tone scale starting from C is '(C), (D), (E), (F#/Gb), (G#/Ab), (A#/Bb)'
Google 'Whole Tone Scale'
XIIXCECXIIX 6 months ago 4
@jamiebuturff can i please mirror both your videos so can get more people to look at this kind of stuff!
TheLovesoul1 4 weeks ago in playlist More videos from jamiebuturff
"Most Harmonic Numbers" refers to ratio components, not Hertz. You seem so interested in numbers that you overlook they're multiplied by units. A Hertz is the reciprocal of a second, so in order for any of these frequencies to be significant as integer values without decimal points you have to explain why the length of a second is a cosmically fundamental, rather than an arbitrary measuring convention. You also say that 186624 is close to the speed of light, but neglect to tell us in which units
FluffyBunniesOnFire 8 months ago
@FluffyBunniesOnFire The units of the 186,624 is nautical mile per second. A nautical mile is a unit of length corresponding approximately to one minute of arc of latitude along any meridian and was determined to be approximately 6,076 feet. Now I contend that it should be 6144 nautical feet. This would put 6114 as a G on the Most Harmonic Numbers while the 186,624 is an F#. On the chart the two are separated by 3 spaces up and 5 spaces over or a 3:5 ratio. This is a Fibonacci ratio.
jamiebuturff 8 months ago
These family number groups make a pointless numerology game that only works in base 10, which has no basis in nature.
The Pythagorean intervals are merely the family of just intonations whose ratio components can have prime factors no higher than 3. It doesn't even support the 5/4 ratio of a maj3, but rather 81/64, so it takes many more subharmonic cycles before it synchronizes as a harmony.
FluffyBunniesOnFire 8 months ago
@FluffyBunniesOnFire It's actually a Base 10 Mod 9 system.
jamiebuturff 8 months ago
@jamiebuturff so how would all of this work in a base 12 system (which is just as good if not better than base 10)?
cangjie12 7 months ago
The Pythagorean intervals are merely the family of just intonations whose ratio components can have prime factors no higher than 3. It doesn't even support the 5/4 ratio of a maj3, but rather 81/64, so it takes many more subharmonic cycles before it synchronizes as a harmony.
FluffyBunniesOnFire 8 months ago
How would the velocity of light in modern day miles be accounted for by this method, being that Pythagoras knew nothing of our measurment of the mile? The Cosmic 432 is woven through everything? How is it that different forms of measuring all seem to work together both past and modern systems and come up with the same numbers? Back to the bible again oy vey! Can't we do this without false religions and their mind control agendas and numerology/pyramidology styled proofs which have all failed?
77GSlinger 9 months ago
3+1+2=6
9+7+8=24 2+4=6
6+4+5=15 1+5=6
666...mmmmmmmmmmmm
pikachu11265 9 months ago
hi there great work, can you recommend any good books on this subject? thanks in advance.
tomm4272 9 months ago
sorry, but, around 7:30, when talking about "The fingerprint of god" diagram, you state that moving from the five to the one, 5 and 5 make 10, but it's actually that 32 (which make the five) doubles to become 64, which is one. Just a mistake, no big deal
cLUTz83 10 months ago
what happens when u put 432 hz into a rodin coil? anything special?and does winding b match harmonics? just a thought since the 396 is for modulation of the doubling circuit.
corvusdaggrium 11 months ago
Great work...all adding to 9...such an important number to many ancient cultures.
Tesla always said the key was 369
Keep exploring and good luck
carr60ick 11 months ago
Numbers and how they are organized relate to and mean EVERYTHING...
I am certain that this kind of information is EXACTLY the kind of Information certain entities prefer withheld.
Jerrodswmhr 11 months ago
Comment removed
inphiknitfractal 11 months ago
Would be cool to make a hemp 432 A didgeridoo !
Sainter 11 months ago
Well put guys! Nice graphics too ;) Having followed this work for several years, this is topping it. Thank you.
jabeguy 11 months ago
love your videos, appreciate you sharing with us
thebarcaroller 11 months ago
hi I wanted to point out that at 11:25 in the movie . 843- 438 is actually 405 not 54 .
sadreset 11 months ago
@sadreset Yes, you are so right. Thank you for pointing that out. The numbers should read 438-384=54
jamiebuturff 11 months ago
All this makes me wonder how this ties in to Ed Leedskalnin and if there is any clues with his "sweet 16" and the two numbers left on the castle - 7129 & 6105195. Since the only eye witnesses of his abilities was a few teenage boys that claimed they saw him singing to the stones, I am sure there is a significant connection.
maximumgravity 11 months ago
great work...keep it up! we learn from your research ;)...let the music lessons begin !
infectedsilence 11 months ago
Also on a side note. Its too bad that DrLenHorowitz has not returned. Sometimes truth can easily be displayed by someones willingness to debate information while not involving the ego. I was looking forward to what he had to say about the other... set of numbers
Indigozek 11 months ago
I will post any video response from you Len. Let's bring this debate out to the people with facts. I have just presented mine, with a few more for Part 3. Thank you for joining. I look forward to hearing from you!
jamiebuturff 11 months ago
I worked with Dr. Puleo for several years. He never once mentioned 432Hz to me, but 528 many times. Nor am I aware that Marko Rodin has anything more positive to say about 432Hz than 528Hz, since Rodin confirmed, in my presence, Dr. Puleo's revelation that 528 is part of his Infinity Pattern (Signature of God) found in his matrix of universal construction. I LOVE 432Hz for all the reasons stated in this clip, but without 528Hz, my heart would not know LOVE, the heart of creation and the Creator.
DrLenHorowitz 11 months ago
@DrLenHorowitz Hi Len, it's great to finally have you involved in this debate. Thank you for joining. Yes, I know Marko Rodin confirmed to you over the phone that the 528 was part of the infinity pattern, because it is. But Marko also told you that you, "Don't know what you are talking about..." when you claimed that the 528 was an actual frequency. Further, you have propagated all over the Internet that the 528Hz frequency is used to repair DNA. Name one who will admit this publicly.
jamiebuturff 11 months ago
432Hz is a wonderful healing frequency, HOWEVER, to claim that 528 is out of the Pythagorean Matrix is VERY misleading. 528 is at the heart of EVERYTHING including the "Pythagorean Comma"--also known as the "Pythagorean Crisis"--cited by McClain. Pi, Phi, and Fibonacci series depends on 528, as does 5280 ft/mile,. It is false to claim 512 is close enough to 528 to have phase-locking (i.e., coherence), for healing. I highly recommend you redo this video to reflect the greater truth.
DrLenHorowitz 11 months ago
@DrLenHorowitz The Pythagorean comma is not a single frequency but is a group of frequencies. Our music today is in equal temperament, which means the Pythagorean circle of 5ths doesn't resolve to the next higher octave (because Nature is an Infinity) so we sharpen the notes up and flatten them going down from middle C. The 528 is at the heart of everything just like the 174 and 396 are at the heart. The 432Hz (and PHI) is the vibrational frequency that links them all together.
jamiebuturff 11 months ago
More great stuff,. I love the road this is going down....looking forward to more to come
maximumgravity 11 months ago
I wanted to suggest the ABRAHADABRA forums too. I am overwhelmed by the information on that website though, so I havn't gone that deep yet. Thanks again, just wanted to share some stuff and see what you thought. I anxiously await more videos from you.
Indigozek 11 months ago
Also, check out The Template videos. Its a 3 part series that you may resonate with. The theme of the video is sacred geometry and how it relates to the human being. The video itself is presented more poetically instead of mathematically though. Regardless, its probably my favorite series of all time. Also check out the series about DNA and implosion by Dan Winter. Really interesting stuff relating to fractal implosion and bliss through the golden ratio in the dodecahedron.
Indigozek 11 months ago
Thank you for this amazing video! That is no understatement. Although I recently purchased a set of chakra tuning forks. One of them is the Heart chakra which is tuned to 136.10 HZ. I don't see any logical pattern for how these are tuned other than the idea of them being an octave of the planets. Do you know how these frequencies relate to the work you are doing, or if they are correct? the 136.10 is supposed to be in tune with the cosmic OM as well.
Indigozek 11 months ago
@Indigozek Using the 432Hz as the standard pitch with Pythagorean tuning the 136 would be a C# (136.68Hz). According to my research the cosmic OM is the vibration and the Sri Yantra is the geometric equivalent. The oldest Sri Yantra we know of is found at Mt. Meru where there are 432 Buddha statues and 72 stupas. I'm pretty sure the builders were trying to tell us something.
jamiebuturff 11 months ago
@jamiebuturff Ok, I am doing my best to understand. I have researched this, and watched the video about 10 times and I just don't get it. How are the chakra frequencies derived from 432? What I don't understand is, if 432hz is the "middle" or 'base" pitch to derive other frequencies from. How do we get 128hz, 256hz from 432? Also, how does 136.10 relate to 432? Why is 136.10 the frequency of the heart chakra, yet this chart indicates 128 or 256? How are the solfeggio and chakras related?
Indigozek 11 months ago
@Indigozek Also, you are not obligated to answer these questions, but I have been trying to understand the musical piece of the puzzle for a long time. I may just need to dig deeper into music theory or take a class.
Indigozek 11 months ago
@Indigozek The chakra frequencies came from a Tibetan chakra bowl CD by Ben Scott and Christa Mitchell. It just so happens that all of the frequencies of the bowls are tuned to 432Hz using Pythagorean tuning. For example, we get the 128Hz (the note of C one octave below middle C) by taking the 108, or two octaves below the 432 and multiplying it by 1.18518 (see chart in movie) using Pythagorean tuning making it a Minor Third of the note of A.
jamiebuturff 11 months ago
@jamiebuturff Alright, thank you for clarifying. The only other thing i'm wondering is why there is a difference with tuning forks. Why not tune the Heart fork frequency to 128 instead of 136.10? How do these frequencies, 136.10 (heart), 172.06 (crown) etc relate to 432 and its respective octaves?
Indigozek 11 months ago
@Indigozek You will have to ask the people who made your tuning forks how they arrived at the frequencies they did. As for researching how the 136 and 172 relate to the 432 you have all the tools you need in the above video. Good luck and thanks for watching!
jamiebuturff 11 months ago
@jamiebuturff Thanks. I wasn't sure if you were aware of that set of frequencies or how they are different.
Indigozek 11 months ago
@Indigozek I don't know where you got your chakra tuning forks from but I bet they might have an answer to why they made them the way they did. The 136Hz is a C# and not a C. The 172Hz is an F.
jamiebuturff 11 months ago
@jamiebuturff Yeah its really frustrating. They are basically the frequencies of the planets rotations, which relate to the chakras from what I understand. These frequencies are used on a few different websites, yet there are no mathematical proofs that I can find. I really need to learn this stuff myself so I can figure out the truth.
Indigozek 11 months ago
@Indigozek The chakra frequencies are from Tibetan monks' hand-made chakra bowls. I put my tuner up to the speaker and all of them are tuned to Pythagorean intervals of the 432Hz. Your reference to"...the frequencies of the planets rotations..." is what Pythagoras called The Music of the Spheres. The 2 frequencies you mentioned - 136 and 172 - are tuned to Pythagorean intervals of the 432 as well. But I'm going to trust the Tibetan monks about the veracity of the chakra frequencies.
jamiebuturff 11 months ago
@jamiebuturff Great information. Thank you. Also, I agree about the monks. Maybe both sets have benefits, yet if I truly want to bring my chakras into resonance, i'll buy the other one.
Indigozek 11 months ago
@Indigozek To get the 256Hz you can either multiply it by 2 since its one octave up or you can take the next octave up from the 108, which is 216, and multiply 216 x 1.18518 (a minor third) and get the same frequency.
jamiebuturff 11 months ago
It's so amazingly simple!! Great work!!
Givy55 11 months ago