castle bravo 15Mt ( better quality)

[pennywise0507]

Chuck Norris' little lamp for the night to keep bad monsters out...

[paulopezz]

nukes arent meant to kill people?

what are they for then.

heating up porridge.

[cbohar84]

No city in the world would be recognizable after something like this being dropped on it

[SRV1]

Little boy was only 10 kilotons and fat man was 15

[trotskydolan]

@SRV1 Litte boy was actually closer to 15 kilotons and fat man was 21 kilotons.

[Avishankk]

A 15kt nuclear weapon would completely destroy a medium size city. The little boy was 27kt almost twice the size. Though small nuclear weapon cause a certain frequency that would cause a lot of damage.

[deNNyTheWiseMAN1]

@Avishankk nope, Little Boy was 13 Kt while Fat Man was 20 kt. If either was dropped on New York City, it would destroy anything in a 2-3 mile radius. Compared to Ivy Mike which is 10 Mt and would destroy everything in a 10 mile radius

[sprengmeister00]

das war die zweit stärkste bombe der menscheit

[Paralyzer]

two birds are flying and talking, one bird says to the other bird. hey look. whats that fireball coming at us? nahh it's probably just a cloud, don't worry says the other bird. wait here he says to the other bird, I have to fly and check on my kids. I'll be back in 10 minutes.

[wizeman5974]

Even if nuclear weapons have been "scaled down" to reduce some components of effect, who would ever want them to be used again at all considering how life-altering the consequences would be. Nuclear weapons, imho, are a gross misuse of nature.

[smadmead1]

@variant126 Houses today are still wood-framed. Also, not only would the blast create a firestorm on it's own, you have to also think about all of the cars, gas stations, oil and natural gas pipelines, etc.

[Cherimoya9]

Chuck Norris's morning workout.

[variant126]

@onlyhuman2121 Third nuclear fallout is not an issuse today Both russia and the us have signed the NNPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) meaning that nuclear weapons today will generate VERY little nuclear fallout all nuclear weapons today are "tactical" meaning that they aren't designed to generate fallout or to kill people, they are designed to take out military targets such as ships, bases or silos.

[FuriousPumpkin]

@variant126 nuclear weapons aren't designed to kill people?

[variant126]

@FuriousPumpkin No not primarily they are designed to take out military targets such as bunkers, bases, ships or silos

[FuriousPumpkin]

@variant126 any people happen to be in those bunkers, bases, ships, or silos?

[variant126]

@FuriousPumpkin Well obviously there will be some, but they still aren't the primary target...

[puncheex]

@variant126: Not true. Many strategic weapons on ICBMs were aimed at population centers, as MAD threats. Such was the madness.

[smadmead1]

@variant126 Actually, the NPT only limits the spread of nuclear weapons. The Partial/Limited Test Ban Treaty limited signatories to only testing underground, and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty bans signatories from testing nuclear weapons anywhere.

Also, "tactical" weapons are those used to destroy buildings. Strategic weapons are used to take out silos and bases, not ships. Nukes do kill, and fallout and blast are produced by any nuclear weapon.

[Nater245689]

@variant126 You horribly misinformed. The non-proliferation treaty has nothing to do with fallout or yield, or any other technical specifications of weapons. It has to do with stopping anymore nations from acquiring nuclear weapons. The weapons of today are smaller in yield than weapons like Castle Bravo, but they still get a large percentage of their yield from fission so they're still quite dirty.

[Nater245689]

@variant126 Furthermore, you don't understand the difference between tactical and strategic. There are still many, many strategic nuclear weapons. That is what is used to target counter force targets(missile silos, submarine bases, airbases) and countervalue targets (cities). Saying these weapons aren't designed to kill people is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard. Both tactical and strategic weapons are designed to kill people.

[Nater245689]

@variant126 Lastly, tactical weapons are for battlefield use. They have small yields, at least as far as nuclear weapons go, and are for use against conventional military targets like armored formations and assembly areas.  They're very much meant to kill people. The US developed a series of weapons that were designed to expend a larger percentage of their energy through ionizing radiation instead of blast effects for killing tank crews.

[ChamplainDivision]

@variant126 Check your facts, onlyhuman2121! The NNPT, iirc, was enacted as an agreement between the nuclear powers to do everything in their power to prevent the spread of nuclear weaponry to any other and/or third world nations. Hasn't been very effective seeing as Pakistan, India, North Korea and soon Iran have joined the club since then. Also, there is no such thing as a nuclear weapon that does not produce fallout on/near a target. I think you are confusing nukes with neutron weaponry.

[illshockyou]

@variant126 Lol@ you saying nuclear weapons aren't made to kill people. And about not generating fallout, all nuclear explosions cause fallout.

[variant126]

@illshockyou read again...

[puncheex]

@variant126: No. The NNPT only promises not to help non-nukes get nuclear bombs. The only technical treaties in effect are concerning bomb sizes and locations for testing. Strategic weapons are still very much available if needed, mainly by sub IR/CBM and bombers. Bombs aren't designed to create fallout, but it exists in all nukes, to a greater or lesser extent. They actually depend on blast, thermo, and immediate radiation effects; fallout is to unpredictable.

[variant126]

@onlyhuman2121 A large city like london is 13 sq miles so you can see a single 450kt warhead is not nearly enough to kill the majority of the population.

[smadmead1]

@variant126 A 15kt weapon can decimate a mid-sized city; look at Hiroshima. A ground burst 450kt bomb (which would actually be bigger- the Russians use 600kt to multimegaton weapons) would cause a respectably large fireball, and fallout and firestorm damage would kill millions.

[variant126]

@smadmead1 A 15kt weapon can not decimate a mid-sized city not even close, the only reason Hiroshima and Nagasaki were decimated is because the houses there were built out of crap, comparing the buildings that where used back there in japan to modern buildings built today is like comparing modern buildings to huts made out of straws in Africa.

[NANOFORGE]

@variant126 Well actually a 15 KT weapon would decimate a city of any size saying it would'nt is ludacris. It would destroy infastucture, the power grid, contaminate food and water supplies aswell as scorch everything in a 30 kilometer radius. Thing is Little Boy detonated about 500 meters above Hiroshima, if it was a ground detonation it would of caused much more damage. Heck even a MOAB which has the explosive power of 12 tons of TNT can flatten a 10 city block radius.

[trotskydolan]

@NANOFORGE not true, an airbust creates more damage because you are not losing downward explosive force into the ground, the atom bomb designers actually spent quite some effort determining the optimum air burst height to create maximum damage.

[NANOFORGE]

@trotskydolan Thats a good point, thats what makes MOAB's so powerful and destructive.

[trotskydolan]

@variant126 it would still ruin your day though :P and somehow I think London would be assigned one if not more of the big boys of the Russian missile stockpile, it would probably get a few 3-5 megaton warheads fired at it in an all out nuclear war.

[variant126]

@onlyhuman2121 You're wrong, First of all there are about 25000 city's just in the United States alone so when you say 600 largest city's in the world that's like 3% of the world population. Second a 450kt warhead is not even close to being enough to kill the majority of a modern sized city... a 450kt warhead has a "kill-zone" of roughly 2 miles surely people close to the "kill-zone" will be wounded by things like windows breaking, the shock wave and burns but in the end a lot will survive.

[dragonxanimation]

so i just have to make one of these and go to new york right?

[HiDefTutorials]

Shoot and I use to believe Las Vegas could survive a 1000 Megaton nuke! But not anymore.......

[lee8264]

@HiDefTutorials Checkout an article called "trapped by radiation"by the saturday evening post.It is the story about scientists who were trapped in a bunker on Bikini beach when castle Bravo was detonated.These poor scientists were 20 miles away when they detonated this test.A Japanese fishing boat was 70 miles away and all the fishermen suffered horrible burns.Native people on the surronding islands suffered exposure to radiation.Search the wetokian web issue fall 1999 it tells the whole story.

[roquefortfiles]

I cant even process how horrible this weapon would be to endure. Scientists who were 50 miles away said the heat at that range was verging on unbearable. If you were 10 miles away from this thing you would be too close. This hitting a major city? Would be an annihilation beyond anything you could possibly imagine.

[marco71lucca]

mentecatti ...

[LOLWTFBBQz]

Anyone acting like an expert, you're simple retarded. Any "YouTube" discussion on this... or "discussion" would simply be backed up by elementry physics. Looool.. the actually people that know real physics about these bombs, are not going to be found posting comments on this :)

[puncheex]

@LOLWTFBBQz: Really. :Grin:

[geckoboy222]

PRETTY!!!!!!!!

[MrSpEeDrUn]

its sounds so wonderful

[sojtesttest]

please throw Justin Bieber in

[telebaiestpaul]

@sojtesttest and Celine Dion please!

[Joseph565112]

@YUSKHAN funny for you to say that considering Americans are about the the only people left that really believe there is a hell.

[YUSKHAN]

You know when you americans go to hell, it's going to be warmer then that

[madskrillz2]

Just watching this gives me chills. The cloud always gives off an eery aura

[Dortaj9]

I love how people read Wikipedia, and come on here and pretend to be experts.

[thebeetlebros]

it looks fake but its not

[SmashFascism93]

FUCK US IMPERALISM!

[PlatzhirschDE]

Nice Quality

[ValpurgiusDeBragga]

Comment is obvious rubbish. This was 15 MT test and anything closer than 10 miles was eradicated. The width of the fireball 3 seconds after detonation was 4 miles according to the military report and standard distance of camera airplanes on this test was 50 miles, because photographic measuring was only way to get some data about these insanely hot radioactive balls of fire. Maybe the comment is not related to Bravo, about testing in NTS, where only kiloton-yield devices were tested.

[puncheex]

@ValpurgiusDeBragga: Blasts are funny. Bravo was housed in a steel shed on an island called Irioj (Dog Island to the Navy) on Eniwetak Atoll. It obliterated the island, and left a crater about 7000ft across. There was a causeway to the next two islands, which are still visible today in google earth, .8 miles from the blast, even after 7 other nukes in the same place. Yes, everything on the islands were scraped clean, for a couple of miles. Had it been 1/2 mile higher...

[aVoXchannel]

what are those rings in the air?

[StargateMunky]

@aVoXchannel science!!

[ValpurgiusDeBragga]

@aVoXchannel Layers of atmosphere, where compression resulting from shockwave condenses humidity...

[Me6adeth01]

were was this nuke set off

[glcb7]

2nd biggest bomb in all history 15 megatons...its kinda crazy to think that the soviets tested a bomb that had three times the power of this (Tsar Bomb 50megatons)

[ValpurgiusDeBragga]

@glcb7 And fallout from Tsar was lesser than from Castle Bravo...

[puncheex]

@ValpurgiusDeBragga: Yes, because it detonated 2 km high over rock and water, while CB was on an island. Tsar would have been much worse if they'd left the uranium238 blanket in it instead of substituting lead, even without the fireball reaching the ground.

[nucleartactician]

@glcb7 More like 4 times. Tsar Bomba is closer to 57 MT, 50MT is just an estimate. In such high yield devices, every megaton of yield counts.

[Sidewinder9877]

Can't we watch a nuke test video without some gay ass Chuck Norris comment?

[JIMINIK1]

@Balnazzardi I never said that ALL nukes are fake, this one in particular IS. They brought in the Army Corps of Engineers to dig a massive crater and distribute atomic radiation. The "explosion" was filmed elsewhere in the Nevada desert and exaggerated. It was the cold war. We used this lie to scare the Russians and make Americans feel safer, read a book.

[Sidewinder9877]

@JIMINIK1 WTF are you talking about? This was an actual documented thermonuclear test. LOL every book I ever read had something on this test.

[JIMINIK1]

I agree, total fake. You can tell by the clouds. Believe what you want sheep. Guess we've been to the moon as well right? Lol, get a life.

[VrxzAssassin]

@JIMINIK1 im sure you would know what the clouds on a thermonuclear detonation would look like right?

[Balnazzardi]

@JIMINIK1 why dont you get a life, fucking troll...next thing you are saying is that thermonuclear hydrogen bombs have never existed....how would you explain the craters of castle bravo and tsar bomba then?

[Bboeing787]

it was a little fart of chuck norris...

[cameron946969]

its damn pretty depressing that we cant find ways to stop illness and diseases like cancer, because we are too busy making bigger bombs that can blow up whole cities in a blink of an eye. i dont know why the leaders of the world are willing to shoot nukes at each other when they know that the world will be fucked by nuclear winter and fallout. there is no hope for mankind. eventually... we will blow ourselves up.

[Robotdrummerzzk]

@cameron946969 we won't. we could have, back in the 50s and 60s, but not now

[DieserBenuterIstCool]

Utterly frightening...yet breathtaking at the same time. Sheer might for the win.

[KingRay711]

These weapons weren't made to destroy ourselves, that's what the American and Soviet governments wanted us all to believe. The truth is, these bombs were created to scare off advanced alien civilizations that were debating whether to annihilate us and colonize our planet. But when they saw how insane we were to create such monstrous weapons and came so close to actually using them on ourselves, the aliens thought "these motherfuckers are crazy, they're gonna destroy this planet, let's bounce"

[AVIATIO]

@KingRay711

Ah...lay off the weed....

If aliens craved our world, there is no way in hell that atombombs will halt their plans!

[BroadswordTULL]

Satan.

[IronGuantlet]

@BroadswordTULL No, the Russians use the Satan warhead. Not us.

[XBxUxTxCxHxExRX]

Instead Of using Nuclear bombs as weapons. Why don't we just use it as an example Of Infinite Posibilities... Instead Of blowing the shit outa people. Why cant we just get off this Fucking Planet!!!!!! Staring at this Fireball just slowley growing just shows me how sad our world is.. When this is the best we can do.. Just think. if the blast don't get you. the fallout will.. you have no idea how real this shit gets.. i wouldnt be born if the cold war came to midnight, thats amazing.

[recoveringcultmember]

Don't worry. The space aliens have come down to earth and neutralized all the nuclear weapons.

[recoveringcultmember]

@orkneymist Oh, yeah, the Navy guys: The ones that were ordered to put on dark goggles, and keep their backs turned. Yeah, those are great eyewitnesses.

And, oh yeah, a blast crater: That would prove there was a blast. Yeah, it would. And if you sprinkle some radioactive substance around, you might get people to thinking it's somekind of mythical nuclear blast.

[recoveringcultmember]

@orkneymist Yes, I am saying it's a fake.

[GliTCH11]

Absolutely nothing we possess now is more efficient than energy generated by a nuclear reaction. The most powerful chemical bomb reactions are still in the order of 1,000,000 times less powerful than a nuclear bomb. I think we really should go back and investigate other ways of using nuclear energy in ways that minimize radioactive contamination, possibly by using Thorium or other fuels, as a solution to the energy crisis.

[jk47hm4]

30 Megatons.. vs. the 10 kiloton Fat man.. Next thing you know, everyone will have an 'End World' button on the side of their phones.

[recoveringcultmember]

They set off some small explosion, superimpose it over some desert or ocean scene. Add some clouds. And they have people believing it's some giant explosion that can kill us all.

[xshalludiex]

@recoveringcultmember maybe you should talk to the former residents of the Marshall Islands and see what they have to say about that...

[Rock4evr1000]

its sad tht we can make weapons that can end all humanity in a day...but we cant:

1.Stop a oil leak.

2.we cant end a stupid war(not using nuclear warfare)

3.we cant controle our own government

so...are we dumbshts or r we just lazy fucks?

[GloryOfItAll]

this is amazing...

[bombsquad817]

coming to a middle east near YOU!

[naxa321]

@bombsquad817 lol, that was a good one.

[bombsquad817]

@naxa321 thanks, i thought so myself LOL

[geinman1287]

recoveringcultmember: FYI, a new born mushroom cloud is yellow ( or reddish-yellow) due to the formation of nitrous compounds because of the heat. They turn white later as condensation occurs. The footage is real.

[hypercarbon]

You guys do realize that is is probably the "safest" and best war deterrent ever created. How many full scale wars have we had since WW2? I rest my case.

[recoveringcultmember]

It's just napalm burning. Then they play it back in slow motion to make it look much bigger than it is. You can look at pictures and video of napalm burning, and you can see that it burns yellow, with smoke, just like this video.

[Rock4evr1000]

@recoveringcultmember lol dude...its Operation Castle Bravo...ITS REAL =]

©_©

[recoveringcultmember]

@Rock4evr1000 YEah, it's real napalm. THe joke's on you.

[FrickaFreshTV]

omg. how can they do this. if this were to be dropped in war, it would massacre a country

[Balnazzardi]

@FrickaFreshTV The irony is that without nuclear weapons, there propably would have been third world war long time ago...it was the balance of fear, the fear of total annihilation that prevented Cold War from heating up to full scale war.

[valkyrie1960s]

does someone know, how big the cloud is in diameter? looks massive!

[jpongsin2002]

ROBLOX IS SPEAKING! At 00:00

[goofypowerallday]

i want to see one of these in person

[xshalludiex]

@goofypowerallday lol me too, but thank god they dont test these anymore (in the atmosphere anyways).

[calgaryfox]

isn't it amazing that these are all day tests? It completely blocks out the sunlight with its own brilliance, just like the way the suns does for the stars.

[tamenga88]

Hard to believe that the over 3 times bigger Tsar Bomba test was cleaner than this.

[valkyrie1960s]

@tamenga88 was it really?! I thought tsar was just clean compared to its size!?

[tamenga88]

@valkyrie1960s

The Tsar test was Cleaner than even Bravo test.

No Joke.

Bravo was a Groundblast and based on a very Dirty design (Uranium tamper)

Both contribute significantly to fallout.

1000s of Tons of coral got irradiated and launched in the atmosphere leaving a 1.5 mile crater behind.

The Tsar test was done in the air and it had a lead tamper which means that 97% of it's energy was from Fusion.

Barely any dirt was tossed in the air.

[valkyrie1960s]

@tamenga88 thanks for answering! yeah makes sense!

[Nuker1337]

@tamenga88 A lot of dirt was thrown in the air, as can be seen from the massive dust pedestal in tsar. But the fireball had cooled significantly, and barely any dirt was molten or vaporized, which is what traps radiation (since radiation isn't induced to any significant degree). 100+ million tonnes got thrown up in the air (either sucked up or molten, but millions of tonnes were vaporized in the blast) from Bravo.

[SHL101]

Beautiful, But nothing compared to Ivan.

[CheatEngines]

just call it the tsar ok..? most people dont know where you're talkin about XD

[SHL101]

xD sorry

[supressorgrid]

God gave man the ability to build these things. Satan gave us the desire to use them.

[geinman1287]

Eliminating our nuclear weapons will accomplish nothing. It will only leave us vulnerable. The genie is out of the bottle. We can now only live with it.

[GEKGanon]

It is mindblowing that physicists sat in a lab and figured out how to end worlds by fusing the tiniest of all things.

[smeghead666]

some children like to build things with lego, others like to take it apart (as quickly as possible)

[Dallows65]

@GEKGanon Not Fusing... but Splitting

[GEKGanon]

@Dallows65

Thermonuclear bombs fuse atoms. There is some fission, but fusion is what sets "nuclear" weapons apart from "atomic" weapons.

[TinyTitian]

@GEKGanon ya hopefully when amercia scraps dis idea and has a more powerful weapons we wont leave it all on da internet like how 2 make da a bomb -__- just cause we have nukes dat can blow up continents does not mean we should leave knoledge out on how to blow up a city

[datzfast]

@GEKGanon where is the guy that has the masturbating trouble. i guess he hasnt seen this one yet.



[variant126]

@GEKGanon you're a fucking moron it would take over 1 million b83 warheads (most powerful warheads the us owns today) to destroy all human life and guess what there are only about 8000 armed warheads (80% being much less powerful than the b83) that exist in the world currently.

[GEKGanon]

@variant126

Wow. Way to stay civil. When did I ever say we had enough nuclear weapons to kill everyone? I didn't. When did I say we had enough to destroy half of humanity? A quarter? A tenth? I didn't.

[onlyhuman2121]

@variant126 it would take around 600 450kt warheads to destroy every major city in the world (judging from the blast radius which is 5 miles plus fallout and smoke). We have enough to destroy the surface of every continent,  the nuclear winter, fallout, lack of resources, lack of food would be more then enough to kill most complex life on the surface so 1 million b83 (1.2mt) would be far more then needed.

[NANOFORGE]

@variant126 Correct, It would actually take something on the order of 150 Teratons to compeltely sterilize the Earth. 150 Teratons = 150,000,000 Megatons which almost rivials the asteroid that killed the Dinosaurs. Thing is every nuke on Earth combined only equals 5,000 Megatons. I hate it when people think one nuke will kill us all when in reality this nuke does'nt posses even 1% of the energy required to kill us all.

[Rais155]

hey FUCK YOUR SELF your pussy ass would be dead right now if it werent for america. ever researched the cold war or WWI or WWII? yeah it took six of your shitty ass tanks to kill 1 russian one america has saved you UK ass so much you should be loving us instead of licking the queens asshole thanking her for socialisam so do some research and then will talk you british bastard

[exorbium]

hey hey hey watch your fucking tongue its only those little english pussys that worship the queen, we scotts despise her decrepit engiish ass

[HarlockOfArcadia]

@Rais155 Dude, by that logic you should be thanking England for colonizing in the first place.

[ImperatorDerGalaxis]

Beautiful, yet frightening. Let's throw these weapons away.

[iamthemagoon]

destroying the thing tht in the end will destroy us will destroy us....

[doutormisterio]

beautiful

[kasijatiss]

@doutormisterio you call this beautiful?! o.O

[LordDavid6]

It looks very High Quality to be a film taken in 1954.....

[tamenga88]

You can digitally restore old film reels

[Sevoverkill]

the military had better filing euipment (mainly because theydeveled it first)

[unspecifieds]

Small dicked white men? Yeah and the invasion rape and devastation of a neighbouring country (tibet), the using of human beings flesh in trade (sale of organs) and the killing of girls because their not boys can only be the invention of tiny wee microscopic dicked chinese men. Also, the theory and invention of nucs was largely by Jews not Nazis, you must be thinking of rockets.

[ugowar]

Nope, this is Bravo. The slightly asymmetrical potato-shaped cloud matches all other Bravo views. Tewa had a more "generic" fireball appearance.

[MrINEEDNAME]

to be honest the explosion isnt that bad i mean oh hell yea if your close to the explosion its going to kill you a bit obvious but its all about the fallout that affects the people thats what people need to learn

[daishi2442]

if you were anywhere near (within 30 miles) of an explosion of this magnitude, you would be roasted.

[Nuker1337]

As a note on this one, this photography was not taken from 4 miles; more like 50 or 70 miles from ground zero.

[valkyrie1960s]

@Nuker1337 you are probadly right, because 4 miles could be deadly with a weapon that big but if this is really taken from 50 miles away, the mushroom cloud is more than what can be described as massive!!! This would be absolutely fucking amaising

[Nuker1337]

@valkyrie1960s Yes, just the fireball was 4 miles wide. The mushroom cloud is expanding all the time, and would be at least 5 miles wide at the start of this video.

[valkyrie1960s]

@Nuker1337 this is absolutely crazy!!!! Just imagine how much room on the ground would be covered by the cloud!! one could fit the center of every big city in the world inside the cloud, thats just so evil!

[destroyed14MCfly]

@Nuker1337 at 4 miles it would have blown ut ass away :D

[scholarlylad85]

@Nuker1337 50 to 70 miles? Incredible.

[ValpurgiusDeBragga]

@Nuker1337 Comment is obvious rubbish. This was 15 MT test and anything closer than 10 miles was eradicated. The width of the fireball 3 seconds after detonation was 4 miles according to the military report and standard distance of camera airplanes on this test was 50 miles, because photographic measuring was only way to get some data about these insanely hot radioactive balls of fire. Maybe the comment is not related to Bravo, about testing in NTS, where only kiloton-yield devices were tested.

[TankyPanky1]

it is true that a nuke is terrible damage, but it still is quite exagerated, we only use TNT to test and simulate a nuke even though it dosnt do near the damage of a nuke, even if a nuke damage is highly overexagerated. NK giving government a scare cus established UN protocals state that a real nuke not be used, but NK using real ones anyways, and they are pretty close to a fault line, nukes are exagerated, but if ur as close to a fault line as NK, a nuke can cause quite a quake

[ProjektPete]

nukes aren't exagerated my friend..ONE thermonuclear blast can level an entire metropolis, what the hell are you talking about? any ONE bomb that can level a city the size new york, chicago, LA, etc PLUS MOST OF IT'S SUBURBS is not to be fucked with. the blast/fire alone would kill 3-5 million if detonated over times square. then the fallout blows all over the place giving shitloads more ppl cancer. NK's nukes are nothing like that, but china, russia and the us have nukes that hit fucking HARD.

[roquefortfiles]

No shit. I heard that the Mike bomb, 10.5 megs would have obliterated all five New York city Burroughs. I mean that is hard to comprehend. All of those huge buildings in New York pretty much disappeared. 3rd degree burns at 40 miles. Its just a nightmare you cant even begin to process. Truly scary scary shit!!

[xshalludiex]

@roquefortfiles The Tzar gave 3rd degree burns at 70 miles away and the shockwave shattered windows 600-700 miles away

[roquefortfiles]

@xshalludiex

Scary!! to put that bombs yield in perspective. Imagine the largest oil tanker you can think of stuffed to capacity with crates of tnt. Then line 50 of them up side by side. Put a long wick into it and light it.

Oh yeah, RUN!!

[xshalludiex]

@roquefortfiles Yeah, 250 empire state buildings all full of tnt put together

[mullaahmed]

Go masturbate with your mother you wanker!

[ProjectW013]

the reason this is such, er, a big explosion is because they misscalculated and this was the result. if we trully wanted to we could make a nuke that would set out atmosphere aflame and well the rest is history. the world at gun-point, that is why it has been put to rest. not to include the after-effects of radiation. overexagerated, perhaps, but they tried to keep the blast as small as possible, a SMALL miscalculation an this is the result.

sorry for the lecture

[goofoffproductions]

go back and live in your cave

[goofoffproductions]

go live in your cave

[monobrowperson]

LOL!

[mullaahmed]

As far as I know China also has conducted thermonuclear tests, so stop calling white people names.

There will always be a technological and scientific progress. Whether you like it or not.

[smithbroz08]

Beautiful and deadly at the same time.

[broubies]

from the film "atomic filmakers"

[xXbelmontXx]

Hey , what is that clip from?