RACHEL MADDOW YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF FOX NEWS CREDIBILITY PROBLEM

[NiceHandTick]

Of course Stossel is not a news reporter. No one at Fox should be called a reporter. They should be called Infomercialists for Americans for Prosperity, Inc. There is NO news at Fox News.

[nodeceit]

Stossel is NOT a news reporter, you bone head!

[upinya25]

I just find it funny that this little boy maddow, and countdown with jimmy legs talk about how they are such a news broadcast, but all they do is talk about FOX, if fox isn't news, why worry about them then, why not report news? Its funny too bc the only thing they show clips from are Hannity and Beck, two ppl that are OPINION shows and openly biased, not real news on the network. I mean you can just as easily find videos of Olby lying on here, but i guess those things are made up.

[youngwolverine2]

.........................

"it's just not what's called news in this country"

And her reporting this is news?

Rachel Maddow is easily the most retarded person on Earth.

[celmser]

@youngwolverine2 she is smarter than the republican party put together.

[youngwolverine2]

@celmser well seeing as I'm a Republican, and I have an IQ of over 150. No, she is not smarter than the Republican party put together.

[hatfisc]

@celmser Why? Because she has a doctorate in PHILOSOPHY? Do you think she considers herself a "Dr." when she nothing more than an expert in fortune cookie thinking?

[Ellipser]

Holy Crap!? Is that John Stewart. I thought I was seeing his double, or is John working two shifts?

[healthhavencom]

Stossel is a Champion of Truth.

Maddow on the other hand, is dumber than dirt.

[Travincall]

@healthhavencom Yes she is!!!

[metalnat28]

No worries [=

That's enviousness. No one can't stand Fox because of their massive success and uniqueness.

Well, actually only irrelevant species disagree with Fox. And what's even best, is that majority of Fox's haters, still watch Fox ^.^

And i am REALLY GLAD to report that "RACHEL MADDOW" is one of em ; )

Without mentioning that Hannity's show beats her own show by a very LONNNGGGG shot.

But yeah, you get the picture ^.~

[brian19701974]

nothing but hate from this no talent, ignorant liberal, without Fox and Palin to complain about, she has nothing, she should be thanking them

[TheSocratesian]

What a joke... A partisan hack like Maddow has no business complaining about FOX.

[ooMONKEYoo]

Give me one clip where her thoughts aren't backed up by facts. I dare you.

[metalnat28]

I never quite watch her shows. But i bet you money that i can find some.

She seems very delusional when it comes to "Fox"

Which is enviousness.

[ooMONKEYoo]

"I bet you money that I can find some."

A lot of talk and no action. Feel free to email me some when you find some. Or you could just mail me that check -- OR you can do what I'm guessing you'll do which is not say anything at all about it and change the subject to how Obama and all democrats are idiots.

[metalnat28]

OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO No beautiful [=

Obviously, you do not know me ^0^ When i feel like you're very incorrect, then i never stop until you prove me wrong which by the way, is very unlikely. I have been doing this kinda shit for a very long time.

And i certainly didn't have to go FAR to already save an irrelevant video from her ; P

And i saved it JUST for you in case you would of reply back to me ^.^ Hah

And there you are already.

I will PM you the vid ; )

[ooMONKEYoo]

How is the video you gave me irrelevant? At the time the video was made this story was very relevant. Obama had that interview session with a whole bunch of different reporters none of which were form Fox. Rachel was just explaining why Obama didn't waste his time with children who don't know how to properly report news without distorting it.

[metalnat28]

Don't forget who's got Van Jones to resigned.

Glenn Beck.

AKA

Fox-News.

Which is something that MSNBC wouldn't be capable of doing so, which is having a strong impression on our government from all aspects.

[ooMONKEYoo]

What does that have to do with anything other than the fact it's adorable that you're forced to change the subject?

[metalnat28]

Uh? : \ How exactly am i changing the subject? -_-

You said... "children who don't know how to properly report news without distorting it"

And i said "Don't forget who's got Van Jones forced to resigned

Glenn Beck

AKA

Fox New"...

Now, tell me how this irrelevant? -_-

Or unless, you couldn't grok the meaning out of it?

[ooMONKEYoo]

I've read quite a bit about speculative reasons why Van Jones resigned - and none of them were because of Glenn Beck.

[metalnat28]

Hah!!

That's right, this is what "MSNBC" and CNN, or whatever wants to make you believe [=

Even though it was highly proven that it was because of "Glenn Beck" That this dude resigned.

Go head, and deny more of the truth [=

I like seeing Fox-News haters going at it.

[ooMONKEYoo]

I love when you do this. You say "obviously dis is tru ur stoopid if u dnt knoo dis!!" without giving any kind of video to back yourself up.

I see you get your debating techniques from Fox News correspondents.

[metalnat28]

What the hell? I mean come one now. You WATCH Fox-News all the time. And so does "Rachel" By the way. So you already know what's going on with em. So why the hell should i bother sending you links about it if you already know everything? -_-

Without mentioning, that your videos "Black up claims supposedly" are filled with criticisms and not "Facts" nor concrete evidence.

[ooMONKEYoo]

Yet another post with no facts. I'm getting bored with you.

[ndes0532]

i think people should recognize that there's a difference between stossels objective journalism and o'reillys dogmatic preaching.

[ndes0532]

stossel was under attack from liberals from the moment he began bashing government. and he is not a mouth for hire. his opinions are always consistent with each other.

[ooMONKEYoo]

They may be consistent with each other but their not that consistent with the facts.

[YentaY0]

John Stossel is an operator in the Rupert Murdoch stable of media pimps. He has no intellectual credentials. He is a mouth for hire. Why listen to him?

[WSOR4025]

They were not protest rallies. I went to one in Madison WI. It was more like a lecture. John and a few others gave speeches about health care and why they feel a market solution is better than a government solution. This is perfectly inline with his political beliefs. After all he is a libertarian. I don't really see the big deal.

[LordVigeous666999]

did people go after Stossel, only after he went to FOX?

I just noticed it, it seemed to me to happen with Stossel and Beck. its weird

[lisamariefan]

Doesn't matter too much, they both sucked before, and they both suck now.

[cano21]

Maddow is an unbalanced, penis envying man-girl which, surprise surprise, is more than likely why she's on pitiful little MSNBC. (A typical 8th grade media club has more viewers that this joke of a network) I'll give her credit though, she's good at being a smartass. But, then again, so is my 12 year old nephew and I'm not taking his advice on serious issues. Guess what - THERE'S ACTUALLY A REASON SO MANY MORE PEOPLE WATCH FOX AND IT'S NOT BECAUSE THEY'RE BEING FOOLED.

[highway234]

they're not being fooled! they KNOW fox, like professional wresting, is real!

they also know the caps lock key always makes you right.

[hotdogwell]

LMAO, yeah, Cano21 sure showed us with his caps lock , LOL !

[cano21]

LMAO, the caps lock sure worked wonders on your mama's panties.

[cano21]

well said winston churchill. get back to your comics now.

[birthdaythesuit00]

@cano21

Fox News has admitted that it's not a news station and that it's Opinion based programing. If your only source or 'news' is from Fox you need to stop posting on the internet.

[cano21]

Of course it's not my only source jackass. Is that the best you've got? Really? Come on, give me some debate here! Oh, and can you point me to the actual source you are referring to where Fox admitted to any such thing? Give me a direct source, a name I can look up - not a "well I heard it on MSNBC" cop out.

[sokoboo]

You want to debate on you tube? You are Faux fool.

BTW John Stossel is the best thing to ever happen to FOX

[cano21]

Sure I do. Why, are you afraid to debate on Youtube for some reason? You wouldn't be the first. And exactly where would you like to debate genius? At a Starbucks?

[sokoboo]

You are a tool. How can you debate anyone when you are limited to 500 characters and it takes you 4 days to make a response.

[TheWarriorsGold]

Great counterpoints...

Her looks & Fox's ratings.

First of all, Dancing with the Stars gets good ratings too. It doesn't qualify it as a credible news source.

Secondly, congrats that a network that reaches fewer homes has less viewers than Fox.

Third, whether you're salty about her ability to put Fox News in their place and prove them wrong or not, the fact remains, she makes her points, and usually proves them with resources while proving Fox was wrong quite often.

[cano21]

Like when she said "gun toting whites are showing up at Tea Party protests b/c they simply can't adjust to the notion of a black president" and then it turns out the footage MSNBC had been running all day was of a BLACK man with a gun who was protesting? It was edited to not show his face or skin, but where you could only see the gun. You buy this MSNBC shit too? LMAO!

[hatfisc]

@cano21 Don't forget when Rachel had Lauren Valle from Moveon.org who was involved in that "head stomping" incident when she rushed Pauls motorcade. She allowed Valle to use her program to tell her fabricated version of the story omitting the part where she shoved a sign in Pauls face. Maddow saw the same video that the rest of us did 24 hours later proving Valle to be a liar. No correction retraction or mention of Valles lie or Maddows role in reporting the lie.

[Smartassawhip]

I imagine now that some progress has been made regarding health care reform the republicans and fixed news will be getting downright ridiculous send in the clowns.. I have my popcorn ready.

[thevirtueallliberal]

Lol, "send in the clowns" .Yeah SmartAssWhip fox is one big circus tent,ha...What do you think of the public option unveiled today by Pelosi ?

[Smartassawhip]

From what I have heard I like it. I think it's a foot in the door even though it has the opt out clause in it. We know that the majority of folks do want this so I imagine the states who opt out will soon have new leadership and it is only a matter of time before they will demand to be included. I have not had the chance to actually read it for myself just yet but I intend to as soon as possible,

[hollywoodartchick]

I am thinking the same. Some governors grandstanded about not taking stimulus money then went ahead and did it anyway...because they needed it after all. Perhaps the same pattern will emerge. Let's hope.

[nt0xik8ed]

don't bogart the popcorn...

[hatfisc]

@Smartassawhip "Send in the clowns." Do you guys ever pat yourselves on the back for an original comment or something not already cracked by Jon Stewart? This is just embarassing. I wonder if you can read any archives of Huffington Post or Media Matters after Rachels laughable segment on the "reptilian brian." People were using that in their vocab like it had always been there. You still hear libs echoing blurbs of "false equivilencies" after Stewarts rally. Evolve already.