@Planjane69 really? besides, given that Craig repeats the same sentences in debates for the past 20 yrs, and had said nothing new (nor has convinced anyone), I don't think that's a point against me
Craig is the most existentially insecure person I've ever seen. his constant whining about the absurdity of life without his Master and without eternal life, apart from being just pathetic, reveals his utter immaturity and selfishness: nothing makes sense unless it's approved by God! nothing is worthwhile unless there's a reward waithing at the end of the road! Craig seems unable to swallow the possibility that he's not the object of Divine plan and the Universe wasn't designed with him in mind
A shark being raped is not going without reason to defend itself because ultimately there is no moral agency to condemn it. Same thing with human societies. We have moral codes to protect ourselves. But we have no plum line, only our intuitions and empathy.
If human societies have no plum line then no one has an *objective* right to condemn anyone else. Any condemnation, while feeling right, is purely subjective. The point behind the Moral Argument is that we as humans really do apprehend a moral reality. This is why we condemn those who don't comply with this moral reality as sociopaths. We all know objectively that Hitler was a monster no matter how many people agreed with what he was doing.
@Planjane69 really? besides, given that Craig repeats the same sentences in debates for the past 20 yrs, and had said nothing new (nor has convinced anyone), I don't think that's a point against me
AgeOfReasonXXI 11 months ago
I LOLed @ the sexist language.
MauricXe 1 year ago
Craig is the most existentially insecure person I've ever seen. his constant whining about the absurdity of life without his Master and without eternal life, apart from being just pathetic, reveals his utter immaturity and selfishness: nothing makes sense unless it's approved by God! nothing is worthwhile unless there's a reward waithing at the end of the road! Craig seems unable to swallow the possibility that he's not the object of Divine plan and the Universe wasn't designed with him in mind
AgeOfReasonXXI 1 year ago
@AgeOfReasonXXI Your comment was very idiotic and ignorant.
Proletariat12 11 months ago
@Proletariat12 a religious moron, being in denial, and with a typical response (for a moron, that is)
AgeOfReasonXXI 11 months ago
@Proletariat12 Yet you raise no points to prove that ?
Lipitorforall 11 months ago
I do not think William Craig can handle how messed up our position in the Universe is. He lost this debate
SuperSharko 2 years ago
A shark being raped is not going without reason to defend itself because ultimately there is no moral agency to condemn it. Same thing with human societies. We have moral codes to protect ourselves. But we have no plum line, only our intuitions and empathy.
Scientialist 2 years ago
If human societies have no plum line then no one has an *objective* right to condemn anyone else. Any condemnation, while feeling right, is purely subjective. The point behind the Moral Argument is that we as humans really do apprehend a moral reality. This is why we condemn those who don't comply with this moral reality as sociopaths. We all know objectively that Hitler was a monster no matter how many people agreed with what he was doing.
OrdinaryClay 2 years ago