Noam Chomsky is an Illuminati shill, I mean he works for MIT! All he does is attempt to provide strife against us real Americans, so those in power have more reason to take our rights. He was also recently discovered as a Freemason, doubt me at your peril.
@stinnetbennet yeah because anyone that works at a university must be an "Illuminati shill" and a "Freemason?" create a thought of your own instead of just regurgitating the nonsense that jones spews...
a large part of what Jones says is propaganda and rhetoric. he sells books on his website that describe how Obama and Clinton are reptilian aliens.... need i say more?
Noam Chomsky is really a hologram projected from the year 3056 by the Illuminati, who control the present by controlling the past by controlling the future by controlling the past... they control EVERYTHING!!! THROUGH TELEVISION!!!
TIMECUBE!!!
P.S. The Illuminati were about civilising society, not dominating it. There is no evidence that they are influential or even necessarily exist today. If they were powerful, the world would probably be nicer given their Enlightenment values.
Are chomsky and Jones real Dissidents Or are theY cOntrolled by the illUminati playing both sides against the middle. alot on the left scoff at that SECRET SOCIETY stuff but looking at human Nature iT Would only be naTural for pOwerful men to try And cover all the bases and InflueNce the socio/pOlitical agenda in fact it is probably far more unlikely that they would just sit back and let the chips fall were they may - sometimes i wish we little people could form a secret society for the poor
here are a couple of anarchists pretending to disagree - nicely done - in reality they are two sides of the same libertarian coin. The manufacturing of 'dissent' is essential for the anarcho/libertarian conspiracy to roll back socialism.
Alex Jones is a right libertarian, that's not an anarchist. Left-libertarians (like Naom Chomsky) are anarchists and opposed to every level of state, right-libertarians are still in favor of some government.
Naom Chomsky is a libertarian socialist, there is no secret or conspiracy in that. What are you even talking about?
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH they are both anti-statist just like the neo liberals, the neo cons, the tea party, ron paul, ayn rand, occupy wall street, anonymous - which is all very convenient for the masters of globalization. The state is becoming a pejorative term just like communism, socialism and protectionism. Left right and centre, Anti statism is the new orthodoxy. Softening up the world for globalization - weather Jones and Chomsky are colluding or not..
A statist is someone who thinks government is essential to society. That includes right libertarians, who feel the government serves to protect your freedoms.
Most left libertarians are against globalization. Right libertarians like Alex Jones claim to be, but at the same time they are in favor of free trade, so I don't see how that would work.
Neo cons may be the biggest statists of the lot. They basically want the government to place camera's in your bedroom, invade as much countries as they can, set up a police state. Neocons is just a nice word for fascists.
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH On the right the key here is free trade - capital flight to the Cayman Islands and industrial flight to China will slowly but surely bleed out the English speaking world - paving the way for globalization. The Anarchists on the Left are useful to the Globalists because of their anti-statist obsession. The Global elite are petrified of a statist revival - weather on the left or the right. They prefer an amorphous global movement attacking a faceless global enemy.
so glad theres videos like this to shut these paranoid morons up. check under the 'conspiracy theories' tab at itwastyped. com .. a lot of interesting posts there also
To say that Alex has made no contribution to society would be a lie. To say he has done no damage would almost certainly also be a lie.
Plenty of absolute truth makes it through his outrageous rambling. Take what you can and learn, do not reject anything outright. Something can be learned from both Alex Jones and Noam Chomsky.
alex jones is NOT the "uneducated" chomsky, he's a fat arsed bj that used to be funny. at this point he's like lenny bruce(aside from the being funny part) when lenny was insane and obsessed with his legal matters, and his comedy turned into....well.....this.
not to mention that alex jones was NEVER really funny, outside of funny by association to rogan and hicks.
Its the ghost of Rothchild inleague with communist liberal facsist neo conservative lennonists trying to get everyone rfid chipped to put us into fema concentration camps to scale back population to make us all athiests. lol come on ppl! alex jones is a FUCKING MORON!
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
Chomsky ignores the fact all evidence related to US GOV's orchestration and subsequent cover-up of the 9/11 mass murders has been deemed CLASSIFIED by the NSA and the FBI.
U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein has rendered strict GAG orders prohibiting ANY USGOV employee/agent/operative from whistleblowing facts relevant to 9/11 TRUTH.
Chomsky's reference to the lack of proof 9/11 was an inside job is rebutted by the legal fact such evidence is inadmissable as per Hellerstein's GAG orders
Noam Chomsky squeezes AJ whispering. People who born after 9/11 and know him for his opinions rather then his reasons and claim he is total new world order illuminati whatever, I mean, old guys is time to leave the PS2 and read a book
Check out my videos, "Debunking Alex Jones", two out now, more to come. I used to be a big AJ fan, but got tired of hearing him lie and stretch the truth for the benefit of selling Chinese made t-shirts and fear-mongering videos. After he started to insult Noam Chomsky, that was the last straw.
@ThatGuyOnTheSquare Strangely enough, I used to like Chomsky, but his interviews show that he is naive and clueless. His main arguments against conspiracies are that people would be insane to carry out conspiracies, and that conspiracies are impossible to keep secret. LOL. Sorry if he should be sacrosanct to you, but he is still staunchly mainstream, or he is deadly afraid to tell what he is really thinking. For me it was sad to recognize that.
@GeorgeAlexanderOz How someone can just toss out a sentence like "Noam Chomsky is naive an clueless" amazes me. You are talking about a man who has been voted, by other leading intellectuals, as the world's top intellectual. A lot of what Chomsky made mainstream was thought to be conspiracy before people like him started addressing it. Whatever interview's you are referring to, there are thousands, where he explains his argument point by point with systematic logic.
@costa020 My statement was a bit too universal, I apologize. Maybe Chomsky is still someone to listen to, but not with the brain shut down. Regarding his arguments on conspiracy, he IS clueless and mainstream, sorry that remains. To me it does not matter if he was elected for Buddha and Christ in billions of worlds. Titles, image and prestige have become worthless for me, and if it's Chomsky talking bull, I will be the one to tell that your emperor is naked.
@costa020 Sorry to pick at you further. You apparently have lost even the readiness to come close to think that "Noam Chomsky is naive and clueless". Then what is Chomsky to you, a saint? Once somebody has come that far, Chomksy can sell anything to them. That is the last moment you can recognize that YOU have become naive and clueless. Somebody else is thinking for you. You have become a follower, a repeater, a fan defending his champion. Go Noam, go!
@costa020 Sorry, Costa, no offense meant to your person, but that one is a BS non-argument. It has no content whatsoever except for the attempt to insult. You can do better.
@GeorgeAlexanderOz A bit of socratic scepticism is very admirable. However I think the problem with a lot of conspiracy theorists is that they underestimate the power of human stupidity. One way of unconsciously confessing such stupidity is often found in the belief that a secret intellectual elite is running the world. These ideas tend to defy proven patterns in behavioural economics. You're right, I try not to step too far out the framework of nobel-prize winning science.
@costa020 But wait a moment, the normal argument for your position would be that conspiracy theorists JUST USE the power of human stupidity, it couldn't be powerful enough. If conspiracy theories were all wrong, then the stupidity of the audience would be the only way to sustain them. So there is an implicit contradiction in what you say. I advise to simply retract this underestimation argument, it is false.
@costa020 But more grave is the following. Real science has no framework that it would not break. Real science is not for winning nobel prizes. Just hypothetically, if the nobel-prize-framework science was bent in a wrong direction, a real scientist would have to leave it, wouldn't he? Really great scientists do not eye prizes but truth.
@costa020 And even more grave, it is stupidity to say, a secret elite running the world is impossible. Which physical law does prevent THAT? Now open your eyes, and take some scientific observations: humanity tries EVERYTHING in a methodical, even scientific way. Humans group together and organize themselves in every area: science, politics, economy, religion, sports, art, crime. Whatever activities you study, humans cluster. That is human nature and biological, perhaps even physical LAW.
@costa020 For a scientist such as Chomsky not to recognize this universal law of interest clustering is naive, stupid, perhaps criminal, if he is involved in a cover-up. Can you imagine such a scientist NOT to see the obvious?
@costa020 There is another law: If you find ONE example, there are NUMEROUS examples of that species. If you find one diamond, there are more; if you find one planet with life, they are countless. If you find just one secret society in humanity, forming secret societies is universal for humans.
@costa020 To close the argument: Considering the law of interest clustering, what should prevent humans from running secret societies for their agenda? Why clustering in science, politics, economy, religion, sports, art, crime, but not in secret societies? My capstone: every clustering tends to form hiearchies, economic monopols. federations, unions, one pope, one guru, one president, perhaps soon one world president, the scientific nobel prize nobility. Why not in secret societies?
@costa020 Final word: Why is a genius such as Chomsy unable to see that? Is he drugged, stupid, stubborn, no genius at all, or is he even an accomplice? I don't know, but I am sad that he is not my hero anymore.
@ThatGuyOnTheSquare It's ironic that Alex have clearly picked up on Chomskys work, everything he says about corporatism is just a repetition. And in this interview he just says what he knows Chomsky has talked about earlier just to seem like he knows as much. It's pretty transparent.
@ThatGuyOnTheSquare "After he started to insult Noam Chomsky, that was the last straw. " Now he's off on a new vent telling every poor knave that will listen that Occupy Wallstreet is a Soros operation and nothing more. LOL The guy is a circus clown and nothing more!
Chomsky can't tell us to question authority any longer with any credibility when he has fallen in line with the worst possible fascist authority that perpetrated 9/11.
@srspower If you never work up the courage to question authority, sure you would think 9/11 was perpetrated by Muslims. But the facts and law of physics show otherwise resoundingly. Watch the documentary 9/11 Mysteries.
I question it all the time but not from the realms of idiocy. Sure there are lots of odd things about 911 but to say becuase of this 'the government did it' is as retarded as saying that just because we don't know all the facts about evolution we should assume a god made the earth in seven days.
Lack of evidence of one thing does not make the case for somthing there is no evidence for whatsoever.
And this also takes attention away from the REAL conspiracy, that being the difference between how things are run and what we are told. Yes leaders of countries do not really run things, yes party politics is effectively a stage show for the masses but there isn't one all seeing all knowing masonic world governement.
Those controlling things behind the scenes argue, war and compete just as much as those we are told run things.
The 9/11 false flag operation is the perfect object lesson in how these behind-the-scenes leaders, who choose the puppets that become our elected politicians, will kill off innocent people by the thousands to make their schemes come to fruition. But if you can't see the obviousness of 9/11's being an inside job, take a course in Physics. Buildings don't fall down like WTC 1,2 or 7 without tons of carefully placed & timed explosives.
Thats EXACTLY my point. You are asserting this was done by a government as a 'false flag' policy just because the physics doesn't add up.
Just because it doesn't add up does not make somthing there is no evidence for the case to be answered. Its simple logic.
And there are plenty of real things to be upset about ie: That for Raegans Star wars project they exploded a nuke in the austrailian desert and it iradiated my grand father who died ten years later. Thats still secret ..
It's more than the physics surrounding 9/11. Multiple independent samples of dust from WTC show the presence of unexploded particles of thermate, as you'd expect in a military controlled demolition. It wasn't Boy Scouts who put thermate there, nor Muslims.
9/11 was done & covered up on a grand scale, involving military contractors, media organizations globally, politicans etc & is an order of magnitude more serious than nukes in Australia.
@zck7 So why would Islamic Terrorists take credit if they didn't do it? Wouldn't they be better off saying something like "the zionist Americans did this to themselves and are trying to make it's citizens hate Muslms" ... type of thing.... i just don't see why they would take blame for something they supposedly didn't do..... Your thoughts please!
Bin Laden initially said he didn't do it, but that's immaterial because Al Qaeda is a fictional creation of the CIA. It is well documented e.g. that the CIA gave Bin Laden $1 billion to start the Mujahadeen to fight the Soviets. And that Bin Laden met with CIA while in hospital (in Dubai) just before 9/11. And that Pakistan's ISI (spy agency) chief was having breakfast with Cheney at the White House on 9/11/2001. Too much evidence suggests a conspiracy by security services.
this is part of the new world order plan that was announced by George bush on September 11th 1990, obviously to make something believable you have to make it reality , if you read some history , bin laden is another creation of the CIA . he was paid $1 billion to start creating El qaida , basically the american government created their enemy
why? because they needed a reason to take over Iraq and Afghanistan to control the oil every thing is staged to serve personal interest.
if you want philosophy and the bigger picture, listen to chomsky. if you want some information on a specific event (ex: 9/11), listen to jones. actually just skip jones and listen to webster tarpley
Although i don't agree with a lot of Chomsky's views, he utterly outclasses Jones in terms of intellect. Jones is a ridiculous court jester. Listening to this is like watching a serious scientist debate a creationist.
frist there is no conspiicuously about freud and einston no body see tham as Religiositys like Figures that but people see marx and chomsky just like a religiositys persons tham Following of tham see as Perfect persons in the eyes they cant make mistkes evey thing that thay say its holy for just like thay Opponents see Jesus.
about the racist thing its not racist its pure.Empirical historys facts dont you thing people who are racist need to know this things just like the most chomsky funs
My problem with the Tea Parties and paleolibertarianism (Rand, Rockwell, Hayek) versus social anarchism (Chomsky, I.W.W., Emma Goldman) is simply this. When you have a crisis and the government or society ignores a group (underprivileged) you create a group of people who will actively work against society--like Malcolm X who said blacks (an underprivileged group if there was one) are not Americans therefore they have no duty towards America--the State or society in general.
you gentiles are Pathetic Always take some jew and make him god or Messiah just like the jesus and kerl marx and know this noam chomsky did you ever wondering why is this all your biggst gods and messiah and your intellectuals from right and left are jewish and you wonder how we the jews call are self the chosen people dont diss this
comment in 100 yreas from know your kids will things that holly histroy just like your Fathers Though't even the arebs belive in a jewish idea of god
@ehudnold9 You conspicuously left out Freud and Einstein. Sure, jews are smart... and good with money... and pretty damn funny. But take your racist bullshit somewhere else. Thanks :)
@ehudnold9 Chomsky isn't even a jew himself, his dad was a rabbi. Funny you'd call him a jew when he's portrayed by the right as constantly slandering Israel. hell, he has nothing but negative things to say about Israel's handling of the palestinians. And seriously, "Kerl Marx"? Are you 10 years old or is english your third language? Any of you who think Chomsky's some sort of "NWO gatekeeper" don't realize you're biting the hand that feeds.
I never really agreed with a lot of Alex Jones said. He have some interesting veiws, but he is really passive agressive to people. Also now suspect him of being a goverment plant. Does a good of distracting people with paranoid crap.
@JoeStunner Jones was not debating controversial issues here. Their respective opinions are almost identical. He tried to impress Chomssky that he he fully understands and agrees with his views on propaganda. Jones was quite clear and articulate in the discussion.-to say he is a a bufoon is nonsense.
. Chomsky typically concludes that the public have a greater awareness of politicians' subservience to the elite than Jones believes -but he is using tact here -not established facts
@JoeStunner Don't be childish mate. Diffrent strokes for differnet folks. IOW he just puts issues in a manner that the uneducated can digest. Not everybody has the attention span or the intellect to listen to Chomsky.
The only childish person here is Alex Jones. Have you heard some of the outright paranoid rubbish he spouts? He's like a ranting adolescent, slinging all sorts of disparate facts and theories at a wall, in the desperate hope that some of it will randomly stick.
Take 2 cups Noam Chomsky, add one cup Buckminster Fuller, throw in a tablespoon of Jesus, a teaspoon of Kermit the frog and a dash of Alex Jones for spice - I'd eat that...
Too bad the ingredients don't set well together...
"I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within."
@pmsan29 how is he "pro-nwo" and how is he a zionist? if your definition of Zionism is the definition used by jews before the establishment of the state of israel then yes he is a Zionist, but if your definition of zionist as used AFTER the establishment of the jewish state, then he most certainly is not a zionist. the two are very different
@Salvysahagun Anarcho-syndicalism is the way Chomsky wants policy to be decided, by the masses. And when Chomsky would vote, he would vote with a Libertarian-socialist mindset.
@Salvysahagun OFC he isn't a fan of the founding fathers. Back when America was first established, only a small elite land-owning minority could vote. In New York Less than a dozen people owned 75 percent of the land. And how does mob rule equal failure?
It is the spirit of the founding fathers that people foundly remember by their documents and compositions. It is accepted that they had failures and errors in ethicial implentation of their philosophies. However in the spirit of Classical Libertainism the ammendments where made. Mob Rule doesn't work very effectively in large populations. This is why a balance was formed a republic, however even in those days people wanted Absolute govern
@pmsan29 ok sure he is do you have any proof could you elaborate a little more I don't understand rabble babble buzz words where did you find that out? or are you just making stuff up? Noam Chomsky gets his information from real sources i.e. books, government documents he tells you not to believe him but to go look for yourself duh. He tells you where to look and he promotes you to think for yourself how is that fake anti-establishment Pro-NWO/Zionist shill? He is a true patriot and a pioneer
The central belief of every moron is that he is the victim of a mysterious conspiracy against his common rights and true deserts. He ascribes all his failure to get on in the world, all of his congenital incapacity and damfoolishness, to the machinations of werewolves assembled in Wall Street, or some other such den of infamy.
"How is it capitalist..." very true. Almost every politician who uses the "free-market" as a talking point has a record of turning around and offering unfair competitive advantage to corporations at every chance. Bush for example wanting free markets, anti-nationalization neo-liberal econ. policy around the globe but trying to constitutionally ban seniors from getting cheaper drugs from canada, citing "terrorism" though these drugs are from the same factories and shipped easily & safely.
Every time Chomsky gives a patient nuanced analysis, Alex Jones intercedes with something like "it's because aliens are putting chemical-X in our drinking water to make our wangs shrivel up," or some other nonsense.
I like how Jones decries folks for uncomfortable alliances (Chomsky and MIT)
yet he (Jones) has had Charlie Sheen on his show-----Sheen is a member of the celebretocracy---- who Jones was drooling over (quite humorously) I might add, he said he saw Charlie in his mankini---(homoerotocism anyone?) what did Jones say about homosexuals?? oh yeah----they hate themselves---
@AUSM92 Leaves a lot of real estate, but conspiracy freaks don't care about details. Plus, calling someone a "puppet" doesn't make him one. Black and white thinking is necessary for conspiracy enthusiasts.
@AUSM92 Depends upon your definition of neocon. Amazing how one editorial in the CSM can influence so many pretend conservatives. Again, you haven't responded to Jones' falsehood. If we planned the attack on the USS Liberty to take over Egypt and then the Mediterranean...why didn't we?
@AUSM92 Believe it or not, I am a huge Ron Paul supporter and I do not agree with Chomsky (or Paul for that matter) on everything. However, I would like you to clarify what free association, democratic syndicalism (which may very well be naive) has to do with fascism? The fascists and Nazis believed in an state-capitlaist, extremely nationalist, war-industry state. Whatever Mussolini's syndicalist-socialist roots were, nationalistic war-industry statism has nothing to do Chomsky's view.
You know what? Any one of us could easily be a professional conspiracy theorist. Think about it: You find a conflict or a tragedy that pulls at the heartstrings of most everyday people, cook up some theories regarding it, use non-existent proof and hearsay to legitimize your arguments, use the words "lies" "truth" and "NWO" a lot, write a book, get a radio show, and BOOM! People think you are a prophet, cha-ching! One only need to watch the Y2K video of Jones lying his head off to get it.
Alex does more harm to his cause (which is not that different from Chomsky's) than good by promoting paranoia and fear. Thinking that being armed will protect himself or anyone else from the mind manipulation that is taking place is a fruitless waste of time, its like trying to cure cancer with a fly swatter. I understand his feeling of powerlessness, but he does own a gun and so far it hasn't helped him one iota.
By the same token that some may feel Chomsky is an "agent" (rolls eyes) others say that Alex Jones and Glenn Beck are of the same cloth. Absolutley obsered to say the two names in the same breath, but one would have to have listened to both to know the difference. Alex is far more comprehensive and factual than is Beck. Chomsky is far more refined than Alex Jones, but the two are hardly in disagreement.
Noam is correct, most people are aware of the fact that the US is ran by the corperations. The paradox here is that propaganda has silenced most people from expressing their knowing this fact by making them feel they will be stamped as "paranoid". This fear is what has stunted what would otherwise be a natural cultural evolution, naturally we educate one another thru discussion. "Discussion" has been smothered much in the same way an abusive parent stunts the full potential of their child.
I'd heard troubling things about Jones prior to this, yet heard him out throughout the piece, and thought he was showing an open mind until he dissed Prof. Chomsky after NC had finished his statements (and could no longer make any contributions to the discussion). Jones could have accomplished something worthwhile here, but instead opted for the comfort of his own flawed views - he came off as more of a shill than NC ever could, and I have to wonder if that wasn't the aim all along. Sad...
Jones should have emphasized his agreement points with Chomsky instead of lambasting him as an "agent" - Jones mixes some salient observations and dot linking with inaccurate and misleading generalizations. Please document how Chomsky is being payed by the government. Please specify his "agent" status, or how his proposed "solutions" are intentionally false and intentionally geared towards ramifying the NWO's control. Instead of generalizing, please specify and demonstrate this claim!
i mean i support free-markets, but this is a retard and a well informed (depending on your perspective) professor.
it's sad that people connect Alex Jones to market libertarians when he really doesn't understand it himself and is just giving it a bad name. just as glenn beck is..
thinking alex jones is nonsense isnt helping either of us meet eye to eye, im not anti any one but i think hes paid not to state the obvious that why we can come off as anti chomper...the obv being that governments sponser terrorism...
I will use some big words within compelling arguments that attack your core emotional aspects! I won't allow most people to speak more than me and only allow them to speak within the realm of my own intelligence. I will allow criminals to take president on my shows and support the hell out of them in order to make money. But, mostly I will scare you because "business wants to keep it's finger on the public pulse."
@TheWanderinSoul Watch it to the very end and you will realize that even though it starts out as a civil interview, it devolves into another of Alex Jones's rants, against (drum roll...) ... Chomsky. From now on, before calling someone a fucking idiot on Youtube, learn a bit about context, watch the entire video before passing judgment and, well, don't be such a fucking idiot.
@forrestcrow I see what you are saying but as you said, it didn't start out that way. It's easy for a debate to get out of hand, but I do not believe this was started so that Alex could attack Noam. You insinuated that Alex meant to take him on from the start, I don't see it that way.
@forrestcrow Interesting statement considering they both have similar views on almost every topic except for some of their viewpoints on capitalism and the free-market.
Let me just state the obvious. Most of the anti-Chomsky people on this comment page are New World Order conspiracy theorists who hate Chomsky because he doesn't believe the nonsense that is promoted by Alex Jones.
leave Noam alone he has revealed more, through his research, and stood up to the powers that be, demonstrating and being involved with the Pentagon papers, both of which could have got him put in prison back in the 60s for a long time.
Alex Jones is a fucking retard. Dude went to community college and just straight up sounds like he has clinical paranoia. I honestly think he is very very uneducated and Noam chomskey is far and away more qualified to talk about anything at all.
@ewoknroll anyone who dispels 9/11 conspiracies always have the same ad hominem arguments attacking the messengers and talking about where they went to college or some b.s....they never debate the evidence because they wouldn't have a leg to stand on. ..either you've researched 9/11 and you know we were lied to or you haven't researched it...period. Wake up, people and stop letting your fears drive you.
@gavrilo2007 this low life guy you are talking about hinted at the possibility of blaming Bin Laden for an attack on the twin towers. He said that 2 months prior to sept 11. It is on youtube.
oh my god, the intro is hilarious! i mean we can joke, but it is inspiring, you know? a down syndrome man with a radio show... this is truly the land of opportunity.
The internet has so much potential, but it's ruined b/c of the people who post things which are baseless and negative...supporting hate and swaying the ignorant to go back to their mainstream propaganda. If you have an issue with Alex Jones, that's fine, but express the issue rather than lowering yourself to name-calling. It's easy to call people names and impress those who use hate as motivation, but it takes intelligence to have a valid, logical point. There is irony in your words.
Scuola Normale Superiore University of Western Ontario University of Toronto Harvard University Universidad de Chile University of Bologna Universidad de La Frontera University of Calcutta Universidad Nacional de Colombia Vrije Universiteit Brussel Santo Domingo Institute of Technology Uppsala University University of Athens University of Cyprus Central Connecticut State University National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) Peking University National Tsing Hua University
Chomsky has received Honorary Degrees in the: University of London University of Chicago Loyola University of Chicago Swarthmore College University of Delhi Bard College University of Massachusetts University of Pennsylvania Georgetown University Amherst College University of Cambridge University of Colorado University of Buenos Aires McGill University Universitat Rovira i Virgili Columbia University Villanova University University of Connecticut University of Maine
@tridentmovies: How about this for smart? Not a single person with any credibility takes 9/11 conspiracy theories seriously. Not one. And they never will. The US government has killed hundreds of thousands of people, all over the world, in the past 30 years. Even if 9/11 was an inside job, it would be completely insignificant.
@athabascka , Also, the U.S. government would only need to blow up one plane and blame it on the ''enemy'' to get the American population angry as hell and ready for war. Destroying 4 planes along with the WTC and Pentagon is so unnecassary and any government plan to do such a thing would have already been leaked. Why would a rational person believe such conspiracies?
Noam Chomsky is an Illuminati shill, I mean he works for MIT! All he does is attempt to provide strife against us real Americans, so those in power have more reason to take our rights. He was also recently discovered as a Freemason, doubt me at your peril.
stinnetbennet 1 week ago
@stinnetbennet yeah because anyone that works at a university must be an "Illuminati shill" and a "Freemason?" create a thought of your own instead of just regurgitating the nonsense that jones spews...
DeweyZinnChomskyFisk 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
a large part of what Jones says is propaganda and rhetoric. he sells books on his website that describe how Obama and Clinton are reptilian aliens.... need i say more?
DeweyZinnChomskyFisk 2 weeks ago
Cool fact: Chomsky was old before Jones was even born!.
samer721 3 weeks ago
Jones you blew this one
Chomsky owned you on this one,,
samsonlt123 1 month ago
Noam Chomsky is really a hologram projected from the year 3056 by the Illuminati, who control the present by controlling the past by controlling the future by controlling the past... they control EVERYTHING!!! THROUGH TELEVISION!!!
TIMECUBE!!!
P.S. The Illuminati were about civilising society, not dominating it. There is no evidence that they are influential or even necessarily exist today. If they were powerful, the world would probably be nicer given their Enlightenment values.
FrogmortonHotchkiss 1 month ago 2
There are no stupid ideas, only stupid people. Whilst there ideas are similar Alex Jones is clearly stupid.
TheMa11lman 1 month ago
Are chomsky and Jones real Dissidents Or are theY cOntrolled by the illUminati playing both sides against the middle. alot on the left scoff at that SECRET SOCIETY stuff but looking at human Nature iT Would only be naTural for pOwerful men to try And cover all the bases and InflueNce the socio/pOlitical agenda in fact it is probably far more unlikely that they would just sit back and let the chips fall were they may - sometimes i wish we little people could form a secret society for the poor
32peartree 2 months ago
@32peartree "I bet I'll look real smart if I go around making unfalsifiable claims about Noam Chomsky being an 'Illuminati puppet'"
You don't look smart; you look like a moron.
GiantSandles 1 month ago
holy...i never thought i'd hear a conversation between these two...they are like dimensions away from each other
Gonko100 2 months ago
here are a couple of anarchists pretending to disagree - nicely done - in reality they are two sides of the same libertarian coin. The manufacturing of 'dissent' is essential for the anarcho/libertarian conspiracy to roll back socialism.
32peartree 2 months ago
@32peartree
Alex Jones is a right libertarian, that's not an anarchist. Left-libertarians (like Naom Chomsky) are anarchists and opposed to every level of state, right-libertarians are still in favor of some government.
Naom Chomsky is a libertarian socialist, there is no secret or conspiracy in that. What are you even talking about?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 2 months ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH they are both anti-statist just like the neo liberals, the neo cons, the tea party, ron paul, ayn rand, occupy wall street, anonymous - which is all very convenient for the masters of globalization. The state is becoming a pejorative term just like communism, socialism and protectionism. Left right and centre, Anti statism is the new orthodoxy. Softening up the world for globalization - weather Jones and Chomsky are colluding or not..
32peartree 2 months ago
@32peartree
A statist is someone who thinks government is essential to society. That includes right libertarians, who feel the government serves to protect your freedoms.
Most left libertarians are against globalization. Right libertarians like Alex Jones claim to be, but at the same time they are in favor of free trade, so I don't see how that would work.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 2 months ago
@32peartree
The protesters at OWS demanded more regulation of the banks. That means a bigger state.
The Tea Party demanded a fence at the border, crackdown on illegal aliens etc. yet were ok with the Patriot Act. That's statism.
Ayn Rand is just a twat, I really don't care for her.
Ron Paul is still a statist and not even a libertarian. Check his views on immigration for that.
How exactly do you see anti-statism leading to globalization?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 2 months ago
@32peartree
Neo cons may be the biggest statists of the lot. They basically want the government to place camera's in your bedroom, invade as much countries as they can, set up a police state. Neocons is just a nice word for fascists.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 2 months ago
@SSTTEEAALLTTHH On the right the key here is free trade - capital flight to the Cayman Islands and industrial flight to China will slowly but surely bleed out the English speaking world - paving the way for globalization. The Anarchists on the Left are useful to the Globalists because of their anti-statist obsession. The Global elite are petrified of a statist revival - weather on the left or the right. They prefer an amorphous global movement attacking a faceless global enemy.
32peartree 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so glad theres videos like this to shut these paranoid morons up. check under the 'conspiracy theories' tab at itwastyped. com .. a lot of interesting posts there also
culturebully3 3 months ago
To say that Alex has made no contribution to society would be a lie. To say he has done no damage would almost certainly also be a lie.
Plenty of absolute truth makes it through his outrageous rambling. Take what you can and learn, do not reject anything outright. Something can be learned from both Alex Jones and Noam Chomsky.
msingletary1984 3 months ago 7
@msingletary1984
Well said
AnaLoGMunKy 2 months ago
Alex Jones is possibly the most dangerous putz on radio....period !
Enahse 3 months ago
oh joestunner
alex jones is NOT the "uneducated" chomsky, he's a fat arsed bj that used to be funny. at this point he's like lenny bruce(aside from the being funny part) when lenny was insane and obsessed with his legal matters, and his comedy turned into....well.....this.
not to mention that alex jones was NEVER really funny, outside of funny by association to rogan and hicks.
oceankiddd 3 months ago
CHOMSKY is GENIUS!
wufrudelu 3 months ago
Its the ghost of Rothchild inleague with communist liberal facsist neo conservative lennonists trying to get everyone rfid chipped to put us into fema concentration camps to scale back population to make us all athiests. lol come on ppl! alex jones is a FUCKING MORON!
KearaJay 3 months ago
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 3 months ago
A.J.'s network is Jewish owned, and so is he...
klscott5 4 months ago
A.J.'s network is Jewish owned, and so is he...
klscott5 4 months ago
interview starts at 4:23
sandleparf 4 months ago 21
@sandleparf Thanks for the warning.
NicTheNZer 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chomsky ignores the fact all evidence related to US GOV's orchestration and subsequent cover-up of the 9/11 mass murders has been deemed CLASSIFIED by the NSA and the FBI.
U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein has rendered strict GAG orders prohibiting ANY USGOV employee/agent/operative from whistleblowing facts relevant to 9/11 TRUTH.
Chomsky's reference to the lack of proof 9/11 was an inside job is rebutted by the legal fact such evidence is inadmissable as per Hellerstein's GAG orders
dpetrano 4 months ago
Noam Chomsky squeezes AJ whispering. People who born after 9/11 and know him for his opinions rather then his reasons and claim he is total new world order illuminati whatever, I mean, old guys is time to leave the PS2 and read a book
TurpentineRec 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my videos, "Debunking Alex Jones", two out now, more to come. I used to be a big AJ fan, but got tired of hearing him lie and stretch the truth for the benefit of selling Chinese made t-shirts and fear-mongering videos. After he started to insult Noam Chomsky, that was the last straw.
ThatGuyOnTheSquare 5 months ago 20
@ThatGuyOnTheSquare Strangely enough, I used to like Chomsky, but his interviews show that he is naive and clueless. His main arguments against conspiracies are that people would be insane to carry out conspiracies, and that conspiracies are impossible to keep secret. LOL. Sorry if he should be sacrosanct to you, but he is still staunchly mainstream, or he is deadly afraid to tell what he is really thinking. For me it was sad to recognize that.
GeorgeAlexanderOz 4 months ago
@GeorgeAlexanderOz How someone can just toss out a sentence like "Noam Chomsky is naive an clueless" amazes me. You are talking about a man who has been voted, by other leading intellectuals, as the world's top intellectual. A lot of what Chomsky made mainstream was thought to be conspiracy before people like him started addressing it. Whatever interview's you are referring to, there are thousands, where he explains his argument point by point with systematic logic.
costa020 4 months ago
@costa020 My statement was a bit too universal, I apologize. Maybe Chomsky is still someone to listen to, but not with the brain shut down. Regarding his arguments on conspiracy, he IS clueless and mainstream, sorry that remains. To me it does not matter if he was elected for Buddha and Christ in billions of worlds. Titles, image and prestige have become worthless for me, and if it's Chomsky talking bull, I will be the one to tell that your emperor is naked.
GeorgeAlexanderOz 4 months ago
@costa020 Sorry to pick at you further. You apparently have lost even the readiness to come close to think that "Noam Chomsky is naive and clueless". Then what is Chomsky to you, a saint? Once somebody has come that far, Chomksy can sell anything to them. That is the last moment you can recognize that YOU have become naive and clueless. Somebody else is thinking for you. You have become a follower, a repeater, a fan defending his champion. Go Noam, go!
GeorgeAlexanderOz 4 months ago
@GeorgeAlexanderOz
I try not to be so open minded my brain's at risk of falling out.
costa020 4 months ago
@costa020 Sorry, Costa, no offense meant to your person, but that one is a BS non-argument. It has no content whatsoever except for the attempt to insult. You can do better.
GeorgeAlexanderOz 4 months ago
@costa020 My point is not about being open minded, not at all. It is about keeping your brain to yourself, and not handing it over to your emperor.
GeorgeAlexanderOz 4 months ago
@GeorgeAlexanderOz A bit of socratic scepticism is very admirable. However I think the problem with a lot of conspiracy theorists is that they underestimate the power of human stupidity. One way of unconsciously confessing such stupidity is often found in the belief that a secret intellectual elite is running the world. These ideas tend to defy proven patterns in behavioural economics. You're right, I try not to step too far out the framework of nobel-prize winning science.
costa020 4 months ago
@costa020 But wait a moment, the normal argument for your position would be that conspiracy theorists JUST USE the power of human stupidity, it couldn't be powerful enough. If conspiracy theories were all wrong, then the stupidity of the audience would be the only way to sustain them. So there is an implicit contradiction in what you say. I advise to simply retract this underestimation argument, it is false.
GeorgeAlexanderOz 4 months ago
@costa020 But more grave is the following. Real science has no framework that it would not break. Real science is not for winning nobel prizes. Just hypothetically, if the nobel-prize-framework science was bent in a wrong direction, a real scientist would have to leave it, wouldn't he? Really great scientists do not eye prizes but truth.
GeorgeAlexanderOz 4 months ago
@costa020 And even more grave, it is stupidity to say, a secret elite running the world is impossible. Which physical law does prevent THAT? Now open your eyes, and take some scientific observations: humanity tries EVERYTHING in a methodical, even scientific way. Humans group together and organize themselves in every area: science, politics, economy, religion, sports, art, crime. Whatever activities you study, humans cluster. That is human nature and biological, perhaps even physical LAW.
GeorgeAlexanderOz 4 months ago
@costa020 For a scientist such as Chomsky not to recognize this universal law of interest clustering is naive, stupid, perhaps criminal, if he is involved in a cover-up. Can you imagine such a scientist NOT to see the obvious?
GeorgeAlexanderOz 4 months ago
@costa020 There is another law: If you find ONE example, there are NUMEROUS examples of that species. If you find one diamond, there are more; if you find one planet with life, they are countless. If you find just one secret society in humanity, forming secret societies is universal for humans.
GeorgeAlexanderOz 4 months ago
@costa020 To close the argument: Considering the law of interest clustering, what should prevent humans from running secret societies for their agenda? Why clustering in science, politics, economy, religion, sports, art, crime, but not in secret societies? My capstone: every clustering tends to form hiearchies, economic monopols. federations, unions, one pope, one guru, one president, perhaps soon one world president, the scientific nobel prize nobility. Why not in secret societies?
GeorgeAlexanderOz 4 months ago
@costa020 Final word: Why is a genius such as Chomsy unable to see that? Is he drugged, stupid, stubborn, no genius at all, or is he even an accomplice? I don't know, but I am sad that he is not my hero anymore.
GeorgeAlexanderOz 4 months ago
@GeorgeAlexanderOz I will respond to you in a message so I don't end up boring everyone with this debate
costa020 4 months ago
@GeorgeAlexanderOz E-mail him and ask, he responded to all three of my seperate mails last year.
Tyrfingr 4 months ago
@ThatGuyOnTheSquare It's ironic that Alex have clearly picked up on Chomskys work, everything he says about corporatism is just a repetition. And in this interview he just says what he knows Chomsky has talked about earlier just to seem like he knows as much. It's pretty transparent.
Tyrfingr 4 months ago
@ThatGuyOnTheSquare I don't think he does it to just sell t-shirts and video. He plays the part way too well.
RPShredow 4 months ago
@ThatGuyOnTheSquare "After he started to insult Noam Chomsky, that was the last straw. " Now he's off on a new vent telling every poor knave that will listen that Occupy Wallstreet is a Soros operation and nothing more. LOL The guy is a circus clown and nothing more!
tstruss912 3 months ago
“The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media.”-–William Colby, former CIA Director
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
-- William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
..Wake up and smell the coffee people. Noam is bought and paid for. Do your homework, the 'official' story of 911 is a monumental fraud.
FeelGood30 5 months ago
Chomsky can't tell us to question authority any longer with any credibility when he has fallen in line with the worst possible fascist authority that perpetrated 9/11.
zck7 5 months ago 2
@zck7
Except there is no evidence 911 was anything to do with the government and there is a clear connection with terrorism.
srspower 5 months ago
@srspower If you never work up the courage to question authority, sure you would think 9/11 was perpetrated by Muslims. But the facts and law of physics show otherwise resoundingly. Watch the documentary 9/11 Mysteries.
zck7 5 months ago
@zck7
I question it all the time but not from the realms of idiocy. Sure there are lots of odd things about 911 but to say becuase of this 'the government did it' is as retarded as saying that just because we don't know all the facts about evolution we should assume a god made the earth in seven days.
Lack of evidence of one thing does not make the case for somthing there is no evidence for whatsoever.
srspower 5 months ago
@zck7
And this also takes attention away from the REAL conspiracy, that being the difference between how things are run and what we are told. Yes leaders of countries do not really run things, yes party politics is effectively a stage show for the masses but there isn't one all seeing all knowing masonic world governement.
Those controlling things behind the scenes argue, war and compete just as much as those we are told run things.
srspower 5 months ago
@srspower
The 9/11 false flag operation is the perfect object lesson in how these behind-the-scenes leaders, who choose the puppets that become our elected politicians, will kill off innocent people by the thousands to make their schemes come to fruition. But if you can't see the obviousness of 9/11's being an inside job, take a course in Physics. Buildings don't fall down like WTC 1,2 or 7 without tons of carefully placed & timed explosives.
zck7 5 months ago
@zck7
Thats EXACTLY my point. You are asserting this was done by a government as a 'false flag' policy just because the physics doesn't add up.
Just because it doesn't add up does not make somthing there is no evidence for the case to be answered. Its simple logic.
And there are plenty of real things to be upset about ie: That for Raegans Star wars project they exploded a nuke in the austrailian desert and it iradiated my grand father who died ten years later. Thats still secret ..
srspower 5 months ago
@srspower
It's more than the physics surrounding 9/11. Multiple independent samples of dust from WTC show the presence of unexploded particles of thermate, as you'd expect in a military controlled demolition. It wasn't Boy Scouts who put thermate there, nor Muslims.
9/11 was done & covered up on a grand scale, involving military contractors, media organizations globally, politicans etc & is an order of magnitude more serious than nukes in Australia.
zck7 5 months ago
@zck7 So why would Islamic Terrorists take credit if they didn't do it? Wouldn't they be better off saying something like "the zionist Americans did this to themselves and are trying to make it's citizens hate Muslms" ... type of thing.... i just don't see why they would take blame for something they supposedly didn't do..... Your thoughts please!
quincee33 5 months ago
@quincee33
Bin Laden initially said he didn't do it, but that's immaterial because Al Qaeda is a fictional creation of the CIA. It is well documented e.g. that the CIA gave Bin Laden $1 billion to start the Mujahadeen to fight the Soviets. And that Bin Laden met with CIA while in hospital (in Dubai) just before 9/11. And that Pakistan's ISI (spy agency) chief was having breakfast with Cheney at the White House on 9/11/2001. Too much evidence suggests a conspiracy by security services.
zck7 5 months ago
this is part of the new world order plan that was announced by George bush on September 11th 1990, obviously to make something believable you have to make it reality , if you read some history , bin laden is another creation of the CIA . he was paid $1 billion to start creating El qaida , basically the american government created their enemy
why? because they needed a reason to take over Iraq and Afghanistan to control the oil every thing is staged to serve personal interest.
dacca12 4 months ago in playlist Alex Jones SECRET OZ Noam Chomsky
@dacca12 damn jews!
quincee33 4 months ago
@dacca12 also Americans get their oil mostly from Canada.
quincee33 4 months ago
I have to give Jones credit though, he gives Chomsky plenty of time to talk.
rujiel17 5 months ago
Chomsky=pretentious, gatekeeping, MIT disinformant
FeelGood30 5 months ago 2
if you want philosophy and the bigger picture, listen to chomsky. if you want some information on a specific event (ex: 9/11), listen to jones. actually just skip jones and listen to webster tarpley
EndWesternTyranny 5 months ago
Although i don't agree with a lot of Chomsky's views, he utterly outclasses Jones in terms of intellect. Jones is a ridiculous court jester. Listening to this is like watching a serious scientist debate a creationist.
JACKtheRIPP3R189 5 months ago 2
frist there is no conspiicuously about freud and einston no body see tham as Religiositys like Figures that but people see marx and chomsky just like a religiositys persons tham Following of tham see as Perfect persons in the eyes they cant make mistkes evey thing that thay say its holy for just like thay Opponents see Jesus.
about the racist thing its not racist its pure.Empirical historys facts dont you thing people who are racist need to know this things just like the most chomsky funs
ehudnold9 5 months ago
My problem with the Tea Parties and paleolibertarianism (Rand, Rockwell, Hayek) versus social anarchism (Chomsky, I.W.W., Emma Goldman) is simply this. When you have a crisis and the government or society ignores a group (underprivileged) you create a group of people who will actively work against society--like Malcolm X who said blacks (an underprivileged group if there was one) are not Americans therefore they have no duty towards America--the State or society in general.
perdondaris 5 months ago
you gentiles are Pathetic Always take some jew and make him god or Messiah just like the jesus and kerl marx and know this noam chomsky did you ever wondering why is this all your biggst gods and messiah and your intellectuals from right and left are jewish and you wonder how we the jews call are self the chosen people dont diss this
comment in 100 yreas from know your kids will things that holly histroy just like your Fathers Though't even the arebs belive in a jewish idea of god
ehudnold9 5 months ago
@ehudnold9 You conspicuously left out Freud and Einstein. Sure, jews are smart... and good with money... and pretty damn funny. But take your racist bullshit somewhere else. Thanks :)
mightyafrowhitey 5 months ago
@ehudnold9 Chomsky isn't even a jew himself, his dad was a rabbi. Funny you'd call him a jew when he's portrayed by the right as constantly slandering Israel. hell, he has nothing but negative things to say about Israel's handling of the palestinians. And seriously, "Kerl Marx"? Are you 10 years old or is english your third language? Any of you who think Chomsky's some sort of "NWO gatekeeper" don't realize you're biting the hand that feeds.
rujiel17 5 months ago
I never really agreed with a lot of Alex Jones said. He have some interesting veiws, but he is really passive agressive to people. Also now suspect him of being a goverment plant. Does a good of distracting people with paranoid crap.
brownie1982ad 5 months ago
skip to 4:00
majorkeybaree 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a blustering, blathering, paranoid buffoon Jones is. Listening to him try to "debate" Chomsky is like watching a chimp play Kasparov at chess.
JoeStunner 6 months ago 28
@JoeStunner Jones was not debating controversial issues here. Their respective opinions are almost identical. He tried to impress Chomssky that he he fully understands and agrees with his views on propaganda. Jones was quite clear and articulate in the discussion.-to say he is a a bufoon is nonsense.
. Chomsky typically concludes that the public have a greater awareness of politicians' subservience to the elite than Jones believes -but he is using tact here -not established facts
golsno147 5 months ago
@JoeStunner Don't be childish mate. Diffrent strokes for differnet folks. IOW he just puts issues in a manner that the uneducated can digest. Not everybody has the attention span or the intellect to listen to Chomsky.
Hornet0biker 3 months ago
@Hornet0biker
The only childish person here is Alex Jones. Have you heard some of the outright paranoid rubbish he spouts? He's like a ranting adolescent, slinging all sorts of disparate facts and theories at a wall, in the desperate hope that some of it will randomly stick.
JoeStunner 3 months ago
@JoeStunner Ah, stfu, I suppose you are out trying to change your world?
watertonrivers 3 months ago
@watertonrivers
Yes. Unlike self-absorbed, paranoid twat, Alex Jones.
JoeStunner 3 months ago
A crazy liberal recipe:
Take 2 cups Noam Chomsky, add one cup Buckminster Fuller, throw in a tablespoon of Jesus, a teaspoon of Kermit the frog and a dash of Alex Jones for spice - I'd eat that...
Too bad the ingredients don't set well together...
fagandog5560 6 months ago
Chumsky=overrated gatekeeping shill
pmsan29 6 months ago
Jones is right
MrWuldntulike2kno 6 months ago
Should be "Paranoid idiot rants at Chomsky".
bcbobbie 6 months ago
I can't trust anyone who speaks like a fox news reporter. #instinct
jigmixalot 6 months ago
Alex you annoy me. Go back to school and learn how to speak. Dont get brainwashed this time though.
FarhadTv 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within."
-- General Douglas MacArthur
FeelGood30 7 months ago
Chomsky=Fake anti-establishment Pro-NWO/Zionist shill
pmsan29 7 months ago
@pmsan29 how is he "pro-nwo" and how is he a zionist? if your definition of Zionism is the definition used by jews before the establishment of the state of israel then yes he is a Zionist, but if your definition of zionist as used AFTER the establishment of the jewish state, then he most certainly is not a zionist. the two are very different
slovakmath 7 months ago
@slovakmath
I'm not disagreeing with you, but what did Zionism mean before the state of Israel?
Onepretentiousdude 7 months ago
@pmsan29 Chomsky is an anarchist, retard.
Onepretentiousdude 7 months ago
@Onepretentiousdude
Libertarian Socialist?
Salvysahagun 6 months ago
@Salvysahagun Anarcho-syndicalism is the way Chomsky wants policy to be decided, by the masses. And when Chomsky would vote, he would vote with a Libertarian-socialist mindset.
Onepretentiousdude 6 months ago
@Onepretentiousdude
hmm,
Well then he must not be a fan of the Founding Fathers. mob rule = faliure
Salvysahagun 6 months ago
@Salvysahagun OFC he isn't a fan of the founding fathers. Back when America was first established, only a small elite land-owning minority could vote. In New York Less than a dozen people owned 75 percent of the land. And how does mob rule equal failure?
Onepretentiousdude 6 months ago
@Onepretentiousdude
Anit-Trust a Case for Repeal by Ludwig Von MIses
Its 100% true but it leaves out other factors that matter.
I support Anti Trust. But in reality. A real Monopoly is unsistanable.
Salvysahagun 6 months ago
@Salvysahagun
What is Sustainable?
Ryukikon 6 months ago
@Onepretentiousdude
It is the spirit of the founding fathers that people foundly remember by their documents and compositions. It is accepted that they had failures and errors in ethicial implentation of their philosophies. However in the spirit of Classical Libertainism the ammendments where made. Mob Rule doesn't work very effectively in large populations. This is why a balance was formed a republic, however even in those days people wanted Absolute govern
Ryukikon 6 months ago
@pmsan29 ok sure he is do you have any proof could you elaborate a little more I don't understand rabble babble buzz words where did you find that out? or are you just making stuff up? Noam Chomsky gets his information from real sources i.e. books, government documents he tells you not to believe him but to go look for yourself duh. He tells you where to look and he promotes you to think for yourself how is that fake anti-establishment Pro-NWO/Zionist shill? He is a true patriot and a pioneer
MrUNREAL78 6 months ago
The central belief of every moron is that he is the victim of a mysterious conspiracy against his common rights and true deserts. He ascribes all his failure to get on in the world, all of his congenital incapacity and damfoolishness, to the machinations of werewolves assembled in Wall Street, or some other such den of infamy.
- H.L Mencken, 1936
HioPojac 7 months ago
"How is it capitalist..." very true. Almost every politician who uses the "free-market" as a talking point has a record of turning around and offering unfair competitive advantage to corporations at every chance. Bush for example wanting free markets, anti-nationalization neo-liberal econ. policy around the globe but trying to constitutionally ban seniors from getting cheaper drugs from canada, citing "terrorism" though these drugs are from the same factories and shipped easily & safely.
enigmism4life 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Every time Chomsky gives a patient nuanced analysis, Alex Jones intercedes with something like "it's because aliens are putting chemical-X in our drinking water to make our wangs shrivel up," or some other nonsense.
kolomgorov 7 months ago 8
@kolomgorov HAHAHAHAHA!!! It's so true, I think Borat did a better interview with him.
munkyusm 6 months ago
I like how Jones decries folks for uncomfortable alliances (Chomsky and MIT)
yet he (Jones) has had Charlie Sheen on his show-----Sheen is a member of the celebretocracy---- who Jones was drooling over (quite humorously) I might add, he said he saw Charlie in his mankini---(homoerotocism anyone?) what did Jones say about homosexuals?? oh yeah----they hate themselves---
metalreign81 8 months ago
4:15 the actual start of the interview if you want to just skip the demagoguery.
EllyMcCormack 8 months ago
Last year Dr. Chomsky told Iranian TV that at the time the USA attacked Afghanistan they had no evidence that al Qaeda had done 9/11.
See my video:
Chomsky on Faith-Based Wars and 9/11
punxsutawneybarney 8 months ago
'He is a in-atoot professor of...semantical syntax...." Ugh.
1844Freddy 8 months ago
so true about cartoons, and series he should add video games to that list.
kotkee 8 months ago
@AUSM92 Leaves a lot of real estate, but conspiracy freaks don't care about details. Plus, calling someone a "puppet" doesn't make him one. Black and white thinking is necessary for conspiracy enthusiasts.
CSM stands for "Christian Science Monitor"...
masercot 8 months ago
@AUSM92 Depends upon your definition of neocon. Amazing how one editorial in the CSM can influence so many pretend conservatives. Again, you haven't responded to Jones' falsehood. If we planned the attack on the USS Liberty to take over Egypt and then the Mediterranean...why didn't we?
masercot 8 months ago
@AUSM92 Brilliant! Rather than addressing Alex Jone's lie about the USS Liberty, you change the subject. Typical neocon...
masercot 8 months ago
@AUSM92 Believe it or not, I am a huge Ron Paul supporter and I do not agree with Chomsky (or Paul for that matter) on everything. However, I would like you to clarify what free association, democratic syndicalism (which may very well be naive) has to do with fascism? The fascists and Nazis believed in an state-capitlaist, extremely nationalist, war-industry state. Whatever Mussolini's syndicalist-socialist roots were, nationalistic war-industry statism has nothing to do Chomsky's view.
forrestcrow 8 months ago
You know what? Any one of us could easily be a professional conspiracy theorist. Think about it: You find a conflict or a tragedy that pulls at the heartstrings of most everyday people, cook up some theories regarding it, use non-existent proof and hearsay to legitimize your arguments, use the words "lies" "truth" and "NWO" a lot, write a book, get a radio show, and BOOM! People think you are a prophet, cha-ching! One only need to watch the Y2K video of Jones lying his head off to get it.
TheGreaterGood80 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
GNOME CHUMPSKY - ELITIST HEEB
brahmbhattbhavna 8 months ago
Alex Jones is a counter-revolutionary.
bjarczyk 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
masercot is a troll if u encounter him then repost this n warn ur friends. He calls everyone neocons n insutls texans.
crazyboycid 9 months ago
I cannot believe that Chomsky was on the air with this imbecile...
masercot 9 months ago
@masercot
Alex is a loooooooot smarter than most people give him credit for. he really gets the big picture
suchafool990 8 months ago
@suchafool990 Yeah, like when he stated that Johnson planned Israel's attack on the USS Liberty...so we could take over the Mediterranean...
Oh wait, if that were true, we'd have taken over the Mediterranean...
masercot 8 months ago
Alex Jones rules
teecuzbruh 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@teecuzbruh you are dumb
MrCrgl 9 months ago
Alex does more harm to his cause (which is not that different from Chomsky's) than good by promoting paranoia and fear. Thinking that being armed will protect himself or anyone else from the mind manipulation that is taking place is a fruitless waste of time, its like trying to cure cancer with a fly swatter. I understand his feeling of powerlessness, but he does own a gun and so far it hasn't helped him one iota.
SaveEarthEndGreed 9 months ago
By the same token that some may feel Chomsky is an "agent" (rolls eyes) others say that Alex Jones and Glenn Beck are of the same cloth. Absolutley obsered to say the two names in the same breath, but one would have to have listened to both to know the difference. Alex is far more comprehensive and factual than is Beck. Chomsky is far more refined than Alex Jones, but the two are hardly in disagreement.
SaveEarthEndGreed 9 months ago
Noam is correct, most people are aware of the fact that the US is ran by the corperations. The paradox here is that propaganda has silenced most people from expressing their knowing this fact by making them feel they will be stamped as "paranoid". This fear is what has stunted what would otherwise be a natural cultural evolution, naturally we educate one another thru discussion. "Discussion" has been smothered much in the same way an abusive parent stunts the full potential of their child.
SaveEarthEndGreed 9 months ago
I'd heard troubling things about Jones prior to this, yet heard him out throughout the piece, and thought he was showing an open mind until he dissed Prof. Chomsky after NC had finished his statements (and could no longer make any contributions to the discussion). Jones could have accomplished something worthwhile here, but instead opted for the comfort of his own flawed views - he came off as more of a shill than NC ever could, and I have to wonder if that wasn't the aim all along. Sad...
chokkan7 9 months ago
ALEX JONES IS A MUG.
MrGregglesC 9 months ago
Jones should have emphasized his agreement points with Chomsky instead of lambasting him as an "agent" - Jones mixes some salient observations and dot linking with inaccurate and misleading generalizations. Please document how Chomsky is being payed by the government. Please specify his "agent" status, or how his proposed "solutions" are intentionally false and intentionally geared towards ramifying the NWO's control. Instead of generalizing, please specify and demonstrate this claim!
musicalidea 10 months ago
if you want the best video on this IMO.
Youtube: 'propaganda bernays'
(should be first result)
100CommonCents 10 months ago
Alex Jones is so freaking retarded.
i mean i support free-markets, but this is a retard and a well informed (depending on your perspective) professor.
it's sad that people connect Alex Jones to market libertarians when he really doesn't understand it himself and is just giving it a bad name. just as glenn beck is..
100CommonCents 10 months ago
thinking alex jones is nonsense isnt helping either of us meet eye to eye, im not anti any one but i think hes paid not to state the obvious that why we can come off as anti chomper...the obv being that governments sponser terrorism...
scenemaker03 10 months ago
I will use some big words within compelling arguments that attack your core emotional aspects! I won't allow most people to speak more than me and only allow them to speak within the realm of my own intelligence. I will allow criminals to take president on my shows and support the hell out of them in order to make money. But, mostly I will scare you because "business wants to keep it's finger on the public pulse."
xxstealyourface 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Alex Jones vs. Noam Chomsky? Isn't that like a mentally impaired, single celled organism vs. Albert Einstein?
forrestcrow 10 months ago 76
@forrestcrow It's not Chomsky vs Alex Jones you fucking idiot!!!
TheWanderinSoul 9 months ago
@TheWanderinSoul Watch it to the very end and you will realize that even though it starts out as a civil interview, it devolves into another of Alex Jones's rants, against (drum roll...) ... Chomsky. From now on, before calling someone a fucking idiot on Youtube, learn a bit about context, watch the entire video before passing judgment and, well, don't be such a fucking idiot.
forrestcrow 9 months ago
@forrestcrow I see what you are saying but as you said, it didn't start out that way. It's easy for a debate to get out of hand, but I do not believe this was started so that Alex could attack Noam. You insinuated that Alex meant to take him on from the start, I don't see it that way.
TheWanderinSoul 9 months ago
@forrestcrow
Couldn't have said it better myself.
ChomskyandCheetos 9 months ago
@forrestcrow but a single celled organism has a positive reason for existence in the world...
chrisold97 8 months ago
@forrestcrow Interesting statement considering they both have similar views on almost every topic except for some of their viewpoints on capitalism and the free-market.
Bouchon211 8 months ago
@forrestcrow
Jones is sharper than you give him credit for, but he completely sandbagged Chomsky with his bullshit gun control debate
all babies should have guns because their nannies might be Charlie Sheen
metalreign81 8 months ago
@forrestcrow Einstein = god?
souplovesongs 8 months ago
@forrestcrow I think he must've decided that Manufacturing Consent was similar to his idiotic beliefs.
Nationstatesuser 7 months ago
oh my god. the only reason this video has so many views is because of all the arguing
TheHipHopSpot 10 months ago
Let me just state the obvious. Most of the anti-Chomsky people on this comment page are New World Order conspiracy theorists who hate Chomsky because he doesn't believe the nonsense that is promoted by Alex Jones.
knowthetruth1492 10 months ago
leave Noam alone he has revealed more, through his research, and stood up to the powers that be, demonstrating and being involved with the Pentagon papers, both of which could have got him put in prison back in the 60s for a long time.
cheebaism 10 months ago
All he can find is that in Chomsky being a hypocrite is the pentagon funding MIT the place he worked for? Sad. Just makes me like Chomsky even more.
RPShredow 10 months ago
Alex Jones is a fucking retard. Dude went to community college and just straight up sounds like he has clinical paranoia. I honestly think he is very very uneducated and Noam chomskey is far and away more qualified to talk about anything at all.
ewoknroll 10 months ago
@ewoknroll anyone who dispels 9/11 conspiracies always have the same ad hominem arguments attacking the messengers and talking about where they went to college or some b.s....they never debate the evidence because they wouldn't have a leg to stand on. ..either you've researched 9/11 and you know we were lied to or you haven't researched it...period. Wake up, people and stop letting your fears drive you.
CLINTSZAF 10 months ago
GNOME CHUMPSKY
sh4p3shifter 11 months ago
Alex Jones hates democracy
metalreign81 11 months ago
Jones isn't any better than Michael Savage
metalreign81 11 months ago
This is the first time that I've ever seen Chomsky completely wrong about something: he was wrong to bother with this low-life, sensationalist tool.
gavrilo2007 11 months ago 43
@gavrilo2007 Well at least he can reach his poor audience, that's good right?
RoyalKnightVIII 9 months ago
@gavrilo2007 Spoken just like an ignorant sheep.
TheWanderinSoul 9 months ago
@gavrilo2007 you must have never seen the chomsky ali g interview
matthew18452 8 months ago
@gavrilo2007 this low life guy you are talking about hinted at the possibility of blaming Bin Laden for an attack on the twin towers. He said that 2 months prior to sept 11. It is on youtube.
guscaldas2 8 months ago
oh my god, the intro is hilarious! i mean we can joke, but it is inspiring, you know? a down syndrome man with a radio show... this is truly the land of opportunity.
rysw19 11 months ago 3
@rysw19
The internet has so much potential, but it's ruined b/c of the people who post things which are baseless and negative...supporting hate and swaying the ignorant to go back to their mainstream propaganda. If you have an issue with Alex Jones, that's fine, but express the issue rather than lowering yourself to name-calling. It's easy to call people names and impress those who use hate as motivation, but it takes intelligence to have a valid, logical point. There is irony in your words.
songdiver 7 months ago
@songdiver
SHUT. THE FUCK. UP.
GnomesAmok 6 months ago
@songdiver no, bullshit needs to be called bullshit. to spread needless fear is to ask to be ridiculed.
rysw19 5 months ago
knowthetruth1492 11 months ago
knowthetruth1492 11 months ago
I can't believe Chomsky agreed to this. Maybe he's trying to persuade the so-called truthers to use reason.
beorhav 11 months ago
Chomsky is a rational thinker, Jones is a right wing conspiracy theorist loudmouth. I've never heard of a smart "paleoconservative".
athabascka 11 months ago
@athabascka , Exactly.
knowthetruth1492 11 months ago
@athabascka
Well, that certainly proves how "smart" you are, right there.
tridentmovies 11 months ago
@tridentmovies: How about this for smart? Not a single person with any credibility takes 9/11 conspiracy theories seriously. Not one. And they never will. The US government has killed hundreds of thousands of people, all over the world, in the past 30 years. Even if 9/11 was an inside job, it would be completely insignificant.
athabascka 11 months ago
@athabascka , Also, the U.S. government would only need to blow up one plane and blame it on the ''enemy'' to get the American population angry as hell and ready for war. Destroying 4 planes along with the WTC and Pentagon is so unnecassary and any government plan to do such a thing would have already been leaked. Why would a rational person believe such conspiracies?
knowthetruth1492 11 months ago
@athabascka Ron Paul
rjksoccer06 8 months ago