I did listen to it. I just didn't listen to it with an idiot filter.
She said that there were far fewer objects than expected and that they estimated that about 90% of the mapping was complete.
She did NOT say that there were any "huge" objects, what she said was that if there were some hypothetical huge object that it would have to be very distant and in a circular orbit which absolutely precludes it being either a brown dwarf or your "missing" gas giant.
The reason your "missing" gas giant isn't possible is two fold. If it were not in a circular orbit and very distant the perturbations it caused would be easily noticeable and it would not be able to assume a circular orbit by being deflected from low energy near circular orbit to a higher energy highly elliptical orbit. Which means it basically couldn't effect earth, ever.
If it were a gas giant even the size of saturn it would be spotted by its IR signature very quickly.
Now, since the solar accretion disk would have been too thin to support the mass required to form a gas giant at it's outer edge, that pretty much precludes there being one in a distant circular orbit to begin with.
Probably everything larger than 1 km wide that is not in a stable orbit has been mapped, or at least there are very few left to find.
NEOWISE conference [Sept 29] Admits there is a large object out there hidden. Now you are smarter then they with their camera and bi-yearly scan of the sky done in the manner you described? So Popular Science and Neowise can claim it, but it cannot be even though it is best knowledge? You are not smarter then the professional astronomers nor do you have the equipment to prove your assertions. I am not saying Nibiru, just another planet or VERY large ORRT object.
@DeathofSpeech Look at the NEOWISE conference. Watch it. Listen to it. It is admitted and if you cannot hear Amy say it, then you have a mental filter that won't allow you to hear the truth.
I did... and what was said is that the satellite has detected a new class of star (brown dwarfs) and that none of them are closer than proxima centari.
At the same time what was also said was that there have been no large bodies detected in our system and that if one remained undiscovered that it would have to be very distant and in a circular orbit (otherwise it would be obvious).
So, none of your assertion is supported by the source you cite... again.
In short, you're lying and your own cited source says nothing which supports you.
It just doesn't fit your brand of batshit, so you're making up meaning to very precise statements which say exactly the opposite of what you require that they say to suit you.
I told you to bring actual evidence, not more horseshit.
Anyone who wants to watch the entire video can find it as the first item here:
In case you have trouble reading, what it says is that they announced that there are fewer large objects than expected and that an estimates 90% of them have been mapped.
It says nothing about anything really really big "hiding" out there.
Quite the opposite.
Now... Where is this "VERY large ORRT object" hiding and what is it hiding behind?
Keep in mind that the sun can only hide things from our view for 3 or 4 months at a time.
I suggest you come up with something that isn't a lie or empty assertion.
I'm getting tired of your habitual trolling and paranoia whoring.
So far you have presented evidence only of the fact that you appear willing to take the claims made by complete idiots as fact and aren't able to present any supporting evidence to support either their batshit or yours.
All you need to do is to google 5th gas giant. There is lots of current articles on the missing 5th planet. Computer simulations by scientist David Nesvorny of the Southwest Research Institute in Colorado insist the model only works if you include the premise there was once a fifth gas giant in addition to Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus. So it possible somewhere in the galaxy a planet that had been in orbit is play pinball.
No dude... all you need to do is answer two questions.
Where is the evidence that a gas giant is missing... where are the gravitational perturbations that would be required of a gas giant that was not in a shepherding orbit within the plane of the ecliptic...
...and where the hell is the gas giant.
Easy.
Pointing to conjecture and websites doesn't replace evidence.
I don't care what one guy insists if the evidence says otherwise.
@DeathofSpeech "A 'violent encounter with Jupiter' may have hurled a fifth gas giant out of our solar system billions of years ago." - Popular Science [PopSci]
You saying the evidence that is presented in web sites does not negate the evidence just because you say it is not evidence. I cannot take you in a time machine and show you it. So we go by the published best evidence. Not just sticking your head in the sand and pretending that such evidence does not exist.
I don't give a shit what someone posts on a web page. Anyone can post a web page from a faerie tale they made up after a bad acid trip or psychotic break.
"I cannot take you in a time machine and show you it"
Sure you can... You can show me the gravitational perturbations in the other planets and you can tell me the location of this mysterious brown dwarf.
"So we go by the published best evidence."
We go by evidence that other people can see (peer review) not conjecture.
I don't give a shit what someone posts on a web page. Anyone can post a web page from a faerie tale they made up after a bad acid trip or psychotic break.
"I cannot take you in a time machine and show you it"
Sure you can... You can show me the gravitational perturbations in the other planets and you can tell me the location of this mysterious brown dwarf.
"So we go by the published best evidence."
We go by evidence that other people can see (peer review) not conjecture.
I don't give a shit what someone posts on a web page. Anyone can post a web page from a faerie tale they made up after a bad acid trip or psychotic break.
"I cannot take you in a time machine and show you it"
Sure you can... You can show me the gravitational perturbations in the other planets and you can tell me the location of this mysterious brown dwarf.
"So we go by the published best evidence."
We go by evidence that other people can see (peer review) not conjecture.
I don't give a shit what someone posts on a web page. Anyone can post a web page from a faerie tale they made up after a bad acid trip or psychotic break.
"I cannot take you in a time machine and show you it"
Sure you can... You can show me the gravitational perturbations in the other planets and you can tell me the location of this mysterious brown dwarf.
"So we go by the published best evidence."
We go by evidence that other people can see (peer review) not conjecture.
So current best knowledge that the solar system may have had another planet, does not explain a possible loss. I am not saying it is whatever anyone is saying or that it has returned. It is a possible loss of a planet. And if your personal beliefs are such that you cannot see you are forming your own cult beliefs - wow...
"Your title is "How is it possible to lose a planet?" I have shown that it is possible."
No... what you've done is to show that it is possible to insist that something is true without being able to provide evidence.
Basically you have validated cult behavior.
Some of us just aren't stupid enough to believe anything we're told without having some damned compelling evidence (not conjecture) presented to support an extraordinary claim.
Since I obviously proved you with current best known evidence and in that evidence it answered your questions, assuming you could read and understand it, you prove you are just a hostility troll and get your tiny rocks off playing that game.
"Since I obviously proved you with current best known evidence"
You didn't provide any evidence.
You posted an assertion as an appeal to authority, that a speculation unsupported by evidence is fact.
Then you evaded my requirement that you post some actual evidence like explaining how something that massive could have been in the ecliptic plane and then changed trajectory suddenly without leaving any evidence of its existance.
"Since I obviously proved you with current best known evidence"
You didn't provide any evidence.
You posted an assertion as an appeal to authority, that a speculation unsupported by evidence is fact.
Then you evaded my requirement that you post some actual evidence like explaining how something that massive could have been in the ecliptic plane and then changed trajectory suddenly without leaving any evidence of its existance.
Your "reasonable to notice" questions have been answered by the fact we have had NEOs fly by and not know about them until just days before the pass. Also the solar system is missing a planet is being established by Nesvorny. He proposes a solution to problems with the solar system not modeling properly. He suggest a sacrificial giant between Saturn and Uranus that gets pushed out of its orbit at an angle to the rest of the solar system.
"we have had NEOs fly by and not know about them until just days before the pass. "
The only bodies that have escaped detection have been unworthy of note.
"Also the solar system is missing a planet is being established by Nesvorny. He proposes a solution to problems with the solar system not modeling properly. He suggest..."
Interesting... First you say he "establishes" and then you say he speculates. Let me know when you find that gas giant.
If such a body existed the planets wouldn't lie in a plane, or anything close to it.
Where did the angular momentum come from to fling a gas giant out of a planer orbit? Saturn and Jupiter couldn't have done it or they would also have been thrown out of the ecliptic plane.
Don't wander in with idle speculation and zero evidence and expect to be treated as anything but a troll.
@DeathofSpeech news.yahoo.com/blogs/technology-blog/fifth-giant-planet-might-ejected-solar-system-231040732.html You are behind in your reading. Just because your are ignorant does not make you a lesser being. Catch up with your reading.
Why dont some ever actually do some fricking research instead of making stupid comment about someone is trying find an explaination. Stop being so Dumb Down DeatofSpeech
@DeathofSpeech are you denying that in order to see a object light has to be able to bounce off of it? I know more about this subject then you could imagine.. try me..
"are you denying that in order to see a object light has to be able to bounce off of it? I know more about this subject then you could imagine.. try me.."
There is no known object that is not detectable.
A brown dwarf still has an albedo as well as an emission spectrum. It both emits and reflects light.
Even a black hole can be detected.
You're an illiterate moron... Youtube is full of those. You're nothing special.
@DeathofSpeech news.google.com/newspapers?id=Za80AAAAIBAJ&sjid=jaUFAAAAIBAJ&pg=6060,3461403&dq=heavenly+body+iras&hl=en read for yourself.. "It's so cold, it casts no light and has never been seen by optical telescopes. Insulting me doesn't make you right, I can prove what i say over and over and over, you have only proven that you can call people morons better then citing data and facts, you tube is full of those..
@DeathofSpeech Not everyone is angry with you when they write you. They may be posting comments to further conversation, and not create hostility. Cool your heels. You have already shown you might be literate, but you are behind in the journals. Such could have been a nice exchange of information and sources. Or are you trolling for hateful discourse?
Don't evade by pretending this is cutting edge science.
I asked you to explain where the angular momentum could come from to force a gas giant out of the plane of the ecliptic.
Jupiter and Saturn combined couldn't propel a brown dwarf anywhere. You would end up with both of them being flung out of their orbits and the brown dwarf would barely be perturbed.
And if i may add,im only asking you this,as there does as diddy says,seem to be an increase in both volcanic eruptions and earthqakes.Especially the ring of fire in the southern hemisphere.Japan and indonesia are sinking and that whole region highly unstable.Why the increase?Something does appear to be preturbing the mantle of the earth and also the magma.Any ideas?
has anybody actually seen comet elenin through the telescoope? this comet is ether too small to be seen or dont exist , and all alignments that trigger eqs etc. sounds too scatchy to me how about elenin dont exist and elenin jpl is a mirror tajectory of planet x thats coming retrograde from the othets side of the sun from orion constellation u do exactly what nasa want yous to do by looking in wrong place in the sky , it their propaganda to confuse ppl
@DeathofSpeech last year we were missed by 2 large asteroids who seen it ?hah u only see what the gov wants you to see i look at the evidence not some videos on yt and some jpl made by nasa why would they show yous the trajecotry of the real thing and called it elenin they do everything to hide whats coming and why this is all happening/ i tell you this earth rotation is slowing down this cause friction in the core as the 3 layers dont move at the same speed no more somethng is pullin on us
Last week we were missed by a small asteroid... It came within lunar orbit.
I only see what I can look up and see...
The government can't hide the sky from you unless you are locked up in your parents basement and people are feeding you through a slot under the door.
I'll ask you again to post credible evidence for anything you assert.
If you can't give me Right Ascension and Declination and mean apparent visual magnitude, so I can look for myself, then you're talking out your ass.
@diddy00777 dont have time for ppl lyk you if u dont see evidence u look in wrong places earth 's roatation has slowed down dramatically its a fact do your own research o perhaps u another skinhead skull and bones illuminati spreading propaganda hah wouldnt suprise me at all
You mean you don't have the evidence that you would have to have if you could support yourself.
No evidence, just another sales pitch for DOOM.
.
Now why exactly would someone want people to believe this type of crap?
Could it have something to do with trying to sell them a fortune in cans of powdered food, and a cinderblock cave to live in while the realization soaks in that they've been conned?
@DeathofSpeech just lyk i said before i dnt have time for ppl lyk you i dont care what u got to say keep your shit to yourself u best on gtf out off yt before my dick smack your face u lyin skinhead!
Like I said... if you have the time to post at all, then you have time to post objective evidence rather than whiny paranoid bullshit and lame excuses.
"before my dick smack your face
Well, that's a small matter for concern, isn't it?
If you want to prove your case, and prove that what I've posted is incorrect, then put your penis back in your pants and post the evidence for which I asked.
Lame excuses aren't evidence. Neither is your tiny penis.
@DeathofSpeech I hear ya.But what about this?Its just a theory ok?So dont jump on me,as its only a question.What if planet x is coming from underneath us.Ie the south pole?Directly underneath.Only govt officials would be able to see it as not every normal joe,packs his scope and can pop off to antarctica for a stargazin trip,know what i mean?And they wouldnt tell us would they if they did see it coming from that direction,as it would cause widespread panic.Just a theory.
Or, were you under the impression that the earth just sort of stood around in one place?
Were you awake during any part of this video?
If an object takes 1800 years to arrive from the most distant part of its orbit, did you think that it did that inside a year and then just sorts hung around for another 1800 years before heading back?
Do you suppose that during the last couple of CENTURIES that it could go unnoticed?
Nobody is disputing that a tiny chunk of ice that will come nowhere near earth is a small comet.... which has no possibility of having any effect at all on Earth.
There is plenty of information on C2010 X1 Elenin... It is for example smaller than 10 km in width, not twice the size of Jupiter.
In October of this year it will pass within 0.23 AU of Earth...
It will be a spectacular example of nothing happening.
Listen to Amy when she answers the question about another object out there.
desertbard 5 months ago
@desertbard
I did listen to it. I just didn't listen to it with an idiot filter.
She said that there were far fewer objects than expected and that they estimated that about 90% of the mapping was complete.
She did NOT say that there were any "huge" objects, what she said was that if there were some hypothetical huge object that it would have to be very distant and in a circular orbit which absolutely precludes it being either a brown dwarf or your "missing" gas giant.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
@desertbard
The reason your "missing" gas giant isn't possible is two fold. If it were not in a circular orbit and very distant the perturbations it caused would be easily noticeable and it would not be able to assume a circular orbit by being deflected from low energy near circular orbit to a higher energy highly elliptical orbit. Which means it basically couldn't effect earth, ever.
If it were a gas giant even the size of saturn it would be spotted by its IR signature very quickly.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
@desertbard
Now, since the solar accretion disk would have been too thin to support the mass required to form a gas giant at it's outer edge, that pretty much precludes there being one in a distant circular orbit to begin with.
Probably everything larger than 1 km wide that is not in a stable orbit has been mapped, or at least there are very few left to find.
Take off the idiot filter.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
A trolll is one who will not learn. Your refusal to look at fresh knowledge means that you are what you call others.
desertbard 5 months ago
NEOWISE conference [Sept 29] Admits there is a large object out there hidden. Now you are smarter then they with their camera and bi-yearly scan of the sky done in the manner you described? So Popular Science and Neowise can claim it, but it cannot be even though it is best knowledge? You are not smarter then the professional astronomers nor do you have the equipment to prove your assertions. I am not saying Nibiru, just another planet or VERY large ORRT object.
desertbard 5 months ago
@desertbard
"NEOWISE conference [Sept 29] Admits there is a large object out there hidden."
LOL... No, it didn't. That's a complete fabrication.
jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2011-304&rn=news.xml&rst=3154
This is what they actually said.
"I am not saying Nibiru, just another planet or VERY large ORRT object."
Then you're still a shitwit.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
@DeathofSpeech Look at the NEOWISE conference. Watch it. Listen to it. It is admitted and if you cannot hear Amy say it, then you have a mental filter that won't allow you to hear the truth.
desertbard 5 months ago
@desertbard
I did... and what was said is that the satellite has detected a new class of star (brown dwarfs) and that none of them are closer than proxima centari.
At the same time what was also said was that there have been no large bodies detected in our system and that if one remained undiscovered that it would have to be very distant and in a circular orbit (otherwise it would be obvious).
So, none of your assertion is supported by the source you cite... again.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
@desertbard
In short, you're lying and your own cited source says nothing which supports you.
It just doesn't fit your brand of batshit, so you're making up meaning to very precise statements which say exactly the opposite of what you require that they say to suit you.
I told you to bring actual evidence, not more horseshit.
Anyone who wants to watch the entire video can find it as the first item here:
space-multimedia(dot)nl(dot)eu(dot)org/
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
@desertbard
In case you have trouble reading, what it says is that they announced that there are fewer large objects than expected and that an estimates 90% of them have been mapped.
It says nothing about anything really really big "hiding" out there.
Quite the opposite.
Now... Where is this "VERY large ORRT object" hiding and what is it hiding behind?
Keep in mind that the sun can only hide things from our view for 3 or 4 months at a time.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
@desertbard
I suggest you come up with something that isn't a lie or empty assertion.
I'm getting tired of your habitual trolling and paranoia whoring.
So far you have presented evidence only of the fact that you appear willing to take the claims made by complete idiots as fact and aren't able to present any supporting evidence to support either their batshit or yours.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
All you need to do is to google 5th gas giant. There is lots of current articles on the missing 5th planet. Computer simulations by scientist David Nesvorny of the Southwest Research Institute in Colorado insist the model only works if you include the premise there was once a fifth gas giant in addition to Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus. So it possible somewhere in the galaxy a planet that had been in orbit is play pinball.
desertbard 5 months ago
@desertbard
No dude... all you need to do is answer two questions.
Where is the evidence that a gas giant is missing... where are the gravitational perturbations that would be required of a gas giant that was not in a shepherding orbit within the plane of the ecliptic...
...and where the hell is the gas giant.
Easy.
Pointing to conjecture and websites doesn't replace evidence.
I don't care what one guy insists if the evidence says otherwise.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
@DeathofSpeech "A 'violent encounter with Jupiter' may have hurled a fifth gas giant out of our solar system billions of years ago." - Popular Science [PopSci]
You saying the evidence that is presented in web sites does not negate the evidence just because you say it is not evidence. I cannot take you in a time machine and show you it. So we go by the published best evidence. Not just sticking your head in the sand and pretending that such evidence does not exist.
desertbard 5 months ago
@desertbard
I don't give a shit what someone posts on a web page. Anyone can post a web page from a faerie tale they made up after a bad acid trip or psychotic break.
"I cannot take you in a time machine and show you it"
Sure you can... You can show me the gravitational perturbations in the other planets and you can tell me the location of this mysterious brown dwarf.
"So we go by the published best evidence."
We go by evidence that other people can see (peer review) not conjecture.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
@desertbard
I don't give a shit what someone posts on a web page. Anyone can post a web page from a faerie tale they made up after a bad acid trip or psychotic break.
"I cannot take you in a time machine and show you it"
Sure you can... You can show me the gravitational perturbations in the other planets and you can tell me the location of this mysterious brown dwarf.
"So we go by the published best evidence."
We go by evidence that other people can see (peer review) not conjecture.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
@desertbard
I don't give a shit what someone posts on a web page. Anyone can post a web page from a faerie tale they made up after a bad acid trip or psychotic break.
"I cannot take you in a time machine and show you it"
Sure you can... You can show me the gravitational perturbations in the other planets and you can tell me the location of this mysterious brown dwarf.
"So we go by the published best evidence."
We go by evidence that other people can see (peer review) not conjecture.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
@desertbard
I don't give a shit what someone posts on a web page. Anyone can post a web page from a faerie tale they made up after a bad acid trip or psychotic break.
"I cannot take you in a time machine and show you it"
Sure you can... You can show me the gravitational perturbations in the other planets and you can tell me the location of this mysterious brown dwarf.
"So we go by the published best evidence."
We go by evidence that other people can see (peer review) not conjecture.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
So current best knowledge that the solar system may have had another planet, does not explain a possible loss. I am not saying it is whatever anyone is saying or that it has returned. It is a possible loss of a planet. And if your personal beliefs are such that you cannot see you are forming your own cult beliefs - wow...
desertbard 5 months ago
@desertbard
"So current best knowledge that the solar system may have had another planet, does not explain a possible loss. "
It is NOT current best knowledge. It is a conjecture unsupported by evidence.
There is currently far too much evidence against it be pay it credence and no evidence that it should be taken the least bit seriously.
The missing perturbations that would be evident for one thing and the absence of this "missing" planet for another...
unless you can give me the location.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
Your title is "How is it possible to lose a planet?" I have shown that it is possible.
desertbard 5 months ago
@desertbard
"Your title is "How is it possible to lose a planet?" I have shown that it is possible."
No... what you've done is to show that it is possible to insist that something is true without being able to provide evidence.
Basically you have validated cult behavior.
Some of us just aren't stupid enough to believe anything we're told without having some damned compelling evidence (not conjecture) presented to support an extraordinary claim.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
Since I obviously proved you with current best known evidence and in that evidence it answered your questions, assuming you could read and understand it, you prove you are just a hostility troll and get your tiny rocks off playing that game.
desertbard 5 months ago
@desertbard
"Since I obviously proved you with current best known evidence"
You didn't provide any evidence.
You posted an assertion as an appeal to authority, that a speculation unsupported by evidence is fact.
Then you evaded my requirement that you post some actual evidence like explaining how something that massive could have been in the ecliptic plane and then changed trajectory suddenly without leaving any evidence of its existance.
Evidence or STFU.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
@desertbard
"Since I obviously proved you with current best known evidence"
You didn't provide any evidence.
You posted an assertion as an appeal to authority, that a speculation unsupported by evidence is fact.
Then you evaded my requirement that you post some actual evidence like explaining how something that massive could have been in the ecliptic plane and then changed trajectory suddenly without leaving any evidence of its existance.
Evidence or STFU.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
Did We Once Have a 5th Gas Giant Planet? Missing Planet Explains Solar System's Structure - New Scientist 9/22/11 ...
desertbard 5 months ago
Your "reasonable to notice" questions have been answered by the fact we have had NEOs fly by and not know about them until just days before the pass. Also the solar system is missing a planet is being established by Nesvorny. He proposes a solution to problems with the solar system not modeling properly. He suggest a sacrificial giant between Saturn and Uranus that gets pushed out of its orbit at an angle to the rest of the solar system.
desertbard 5 months ago
@desertbard
"we have had NEOs fly by and not know about them until just days before the pass. "
The only bodies that have escaped detection have been unworthy of note.
"Also the solar system is missing a planet is being established by Nesvorny. He proposes a solution to problems with the solar system not modeling properly. He suggest..."
Interesting... First you say he "establishes" and then you say he speculates. Let me know when you find that gas giant.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
@desertbard
Now then...
If such a body existed the planets wouldn't lie in a plane, or anything close to it.
Where did the angular momentum come from to fling a gas giant out of a planer orbit? Saturn and Jupiter couldn't have done it or they would also have been thrown out of the ecliptic plane.
Don't wander in with idle speculation and zero evidence and expect to be treated as anything but a troll.
.
Where is this gas giant hiding?
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
@DeathofSpeech news.yahoo.com/blogs/technology-blog/fifth-giant-planet-might-ejected-solar-system-231040732.html You are behind in your reading. Just because your are ignorant does not make you a lesser being. Catch up with your reading.
desertbard 5 months ago
@DeathofSpeech You obvously behind in your reading. Just because your are ignorant does not make you a lesser being. Catch up with your reading.
desertbard 5 months ago
@desertbard So how is life in Trollville?
desertbard 5 months ago
@desertbard You are still trolling for hateful argument instead of reading the current best knowledge.
desertbard 5 months ago
@desertbard
"You are still trolling for hateful argument instead of reading the current best knowledge."
You came to my channel to post bullshit in my comment thread.
I told you that conjecture was not evidence.
Answer my questions without evasion.
Where is this mystery planet? Where is the evidence that it ever existed?
Repeatably observable material evidence not more raving batshit.
Last chance.
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
Why dont some ever actually do some fricking research instead of making stupid comment about someone is trying find an explaination. Stop being so Dumb Down DeatofSpeech
MrRobby833 6 months ago
@MrRobby833
Why don't you post some credible research rather than posting bullshit apologetics for paranoia whores and morons?
DeathofSpeech 6 months ago
it absorbs light, so u cannot see it.. thats simple science..
poIebot 6 months ago
@poIebot
LOL... no actually a brown dwarf emits light.
Who told you such a moronic thing? Someone who was trying to get around the fact that a gas giant could not remain invisible within our solar system?
DeathofSpeech 6 months ago
@poIebot
Try actually learning something about the subject from a real textbook. It will keep you from looking like a complete illiterate.
DeathofSpeech 6 months ago
@DeathofSpeech are you denying that in order to see a object light has to be able to bounce off of it? I know more about this subject then you could imagine.. try me..
poIebot 6 months ago
@poIebot
"are you denying that in order to see a object light has to be able to bounce off of it? I know more about this subject then you could imagine.. try me.."
There is no known object that is not detectable.
A brown dwarf still has an albedo as well as an emission spectrum. It both emits and reflects light.
Even a black hole can be detected.
You're an illiterate moron... Youtube is full of those. You're nothing special.
DeathofSpeech 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DeathofSpeech news.google.com/newspapers?id=Za80AAAAIBAJ&sjid=jaUFAAAAIBAJ&pg=6060,3461403&dq=heavenly+body+iras&hl=en read for yourself.. "It's so cold, it casts no light and has never been seen by optical telescopes. Insulting me doesn't make you right, I can prove what i say over and over and over, you have only proven that you can call people morons better then citing data and facts, you tube is full of those..
poIebot 6 months ago
@DeathofSpeech Not everyone is angry with you when they write you. They may be posting comments to further conversation, and not create hostility. Cool your heels. You have already shown you might be literate, but you are behind in the journals. Such could have been a nice exchange of information and sources. Or are you trolling for hateful discourse?
desertbard 5 months ago
@desertbard
Don't evade by pretending this is cutting edge science.
I asked you to explain where the angular momentum could come from to force a gas giant out of the plane of the ecliptic.
Jupiter and Saturn combined couldn't propel a brown dwarf anywhere. You would end up with both of them being flung out of their orbits and the brown dwarf would barely be perturbed.
Where is this brown dwarf?
DeathofSpeech 5 months ago
And if i may add,im only asking you this,as there does as diddy says,seem to be an increase in both volcanic eruptions and earthqakes.Especially the ring of fire in the southern hemisphere.Japan and indonesia are sinking and that whole region highly unstable.Why the increase?Something does appear to be preturbing the mantle of the earth and also the magma.Any ideas?
anthonyp43 6 months ago
@anthonyp43
Yes... it's called vulcanism.
The earth does that.
DeathofSpeech 6 months ago
@anthonyp43
I have a news bulletin for you.... That area is call the ring of fire because it has a longass history of volcanic activity.
Do you understand that?
Is there an "increase?"
An increase compared to what time period? last week or a million years ago?
Ideas?
Yeah, start studying and stop listening to illiterate paranoia whores.
DeathofSpeech 6 months ago
@anthonyp43
",im only asking you this,as there does as diddy says,"
diddy is a shitwit.
First he says that it's due to increased solar activity until I point him to actual solar weather reports...
He says it's because of gravitational tides, when the ocean tides haven't changed.
He says it's due to magnetic fields, when an ordinary compass would show this and doesn't.
diddy is just one of those people who is addicted to DOOM!
DeathofSpeech 6 months ago
has anybody actually seen comet elenin through the telescoope? this comet is ether too small to be seen or dont exist , and all alignments that trigger eqs etc. sounds too scatchy to me how about elenin dont exist and elenin jpl is a mirror tajectory of planet x thats coming retrograde from the othets side of the sun from orion constellation u do exactly what nasa want yous to do by looking in wrong place in the sky , it their propaganda to confuse ppl
diddy00777 10 months ago
@diddy00777
Yes... the description text includes a link to some pics.
Earthquakes, are caused by the shifting of tectonic plates, not by imaginary bullshit and a small icecube in pace.
The people who understand that you can walk outside and see the sky, understand that the sky can't be hidden.
DeathofSpeech 10 months ago
@PlanetXwormwood
The people who missed C2010 X1 can be forgiven for failing to see an object <10km diameter for 20 years.
The fact is that the people who found it, found it and confirmed the finding with film dating back that far.
.
If we can find an object that small and that far out, there is zero excuse for missing something about 80,000 km wide cold or not.
DeathofSpeech 10 months ago
@DeathofSpeech last year we were missed by 2 large asteroids who seen it ?hah u only see what the gov wants you to see i look at the evidence not some videos on yt and some jpl made by nasa why would they show yous the trajecotry of the real thing and called it elenin they do everything to hide whats coming and why this is all happening/ i tell you this earth rotation is slowing down this cause friction in the core as the 3 layers dont move at the same speed no more somethng is pullin on us
diddy00777 10 months ago
@diddy00777
Last week we were missed by a small asteroid... It came within lunar orbit.
I only see what I can look up and see...
The government can't hide the sky from you unless you are locked up in your parents basement and people are feeding you through a slot under the door.
I'll ask you again to post credible evidence for anything you assert.
If you can't give me Right Ascension and Declination and mean apparent visual magnitude, so I can look for myself, then you're talking out your ass.
DeathofSpeech 10 months ago
@diddy00777
Evidence or STFU, skippy...
Back it, or pack it.
DeathofSpeech 10 months ago
@diddy00777 dont have time for ppl lyk you if u dont see evidence u look in wrong places earth 's roatation has slowed down dramatically its a fact do your own research o perhaps u another skinhead skull and bones illuminati spreading propaganda hah wouldnt suprise me at all
diddy00777 10 months ago
@diddy00777
You mean you don't have the evidence that you would have to have if you could support yourself.
No evidence, just another sales pitch for DOOM.
.
Now why exactly would someone want people to believe this type of crap?
Could it have something to do with trying to sell them a fortune in cans of powdered food, and a cinderblock cave to live in while the realization soaks in that they've been conned?
DeathofSpeech 10 months ago
@DeathofSpeech just lyk i said before i dnt have time for ppl lyk you i dont care what u got to say keep your shit to yourself u best on gtf out off yt before my dick smack your face u lyin skinhead!
diddy00777 10 months ago
@diddy00777
Like I said... if you have the time to post at all, then you have time to post objective evidence rather than whiny paranoid bullshit and lame excuses.
"before my dick smack your face
Well, that's a small matter for concern, isn't it?
If you want to prove your case, and prove that what I've posted is incorrect, then put your penis back in your pants and post the evidence for which I asked.
Lame excuses aren't evidence. Neither is your tiny penis.
DeathofSpeech 10 months ago
@DeathofSpeech I hear ya.But what about this?Its just a theory ok?So dont jump on me,as its only a question.What if planet x is coming from underneath us.Ie the south pole?Directly underneath.Only govt officials would be able to see it as not every normal joe,packs his scope and can pop off to antarctica for a stargazin trip,know what i mean?And they wouldnt tell us would they if they did see it coming from that direction,as it would cause widespread panic.Just a theory.
anthonyp43 6 months ago
2009 DD45 passed within about 48,800 miles of Earth last Monday.
That's about twice the distance to the communications satellites that keep your world working.
Nobody noticed.
A chunk of ice is due to pass us a quarter of the distance to the sun, and it makes people's assholes pucker up?
DeathofSpeech 10 months ago
Comment removed
ooJesusiscomingoo 10 months ago
@ooJesusiscomingoo
Were you aware that the earth orbits the sun?
Or, were you under the impression that the earth just sort of stood around in one place?
Were you awake during any part of this video?
If an object takes 1800 years to arrive from the most distant part of its orbit, did you think that it did that inside a year and then just sorts hung around for another 1800 years before heading back?
Do you suppose that during the last couple of CENTURIES that it could go unnoticed?
DeathofSpeech 10 months ago
@RepublicAmerica
You know what...
Tracking Elenin, is a really good idea.
DeathofSpeech 10 months ago
@RepublicAmerica
Nobody is disputing that a tiny chunk of ice that will come nowhere near earth is a small comet.... which has no possibility of having any effect at all on Earth.
There is plenty of information on C2010 X1 Elenin... It is for example smaller than 10 km in width, not twice the size of Jupiter.
In October of this year it will pass within 0.23 AU of Earth...
It will be a spectacular example of nothing happening.
DeathofSpeech 10 months ago