BTW, Global climate change is happening. The polar ice caps are melting, so the climate is changing. Some places are getting hotter, some are getting colder, but the water levels are very likely to rise and all I can say is my house will be underwater. Yay expensive Florida properties. If you haven't heard, the oil fields in the arctic are being explored to be opened up. Yay! its raining money thanks to global warming being a "hoax"!
So basically Christians PICK AND CHOOSE WHAT TO BELEIVE IN THE BIBLE... Thank you Mr. Webster. I'm glad you said that. Now I know why all Churches are Hypocritical by nature.
@SaudaraLink Regardless of what he didn't say about truth, he's acknowledging bigoted verses and otherwise not so bigoted scripts that are controversial. I think that glossing over them is wrong, and we can't be "fair-weathered" about our faith, if you understand my meaning. Obviously people want to put a positive face on an archaic faith to make it seem like a friendly, loving, and accepting religion, which is the face I like, but nonetheless is untrue to reality. Thanks though.
@JRooster101 Please, please stop making me feel sorry for you. It's well-known fact that they STOLE money from Social Security to pay for their bad mistakes.
No, going back to big government high tax-and spend policy is a regression in American policy. A mistake we seem to keep repeating no matter how many times it failed. Not to mention, the founding principles our successful experiment of a country were founded on, are in opposition to the failed socialist monarchies that came before it. "Spreading the wealth around ut of fairness" isn't a new scam.
@JRooster101 And stop calling Obama a fucking messiah. That's how dick head brainwashed conservatives think. And they pumped it through the media from day one! And now it's stuck in your pathetic little head that people were looking for a messiah, when all they really wanted was change in Washington. But you couldn't grapple with that for the life of you because you support the puppet on the right and retardedly believe I bow down and worship the puppet on the left.
@JRooster101 HAHAHA. Oh please! Conservatives fought TOOTH AND NAIL to stop the civil rights act! You think the KKK was liberal??? YOU'RE A FUCKING MORON! Okay, FDR's internment camps were fucked up. But how about Richard Nixon's "War on Drugs" (not to mention Watergate) which still is useless and has been proven useless time and time again! But I bet YOU still fucking support that, don't you? SS is broke because the Bush STOLE our money to pay for the war in Iraq dumb ass! YOU FAIL!
@JRooster101 Who forced oil rigs to pull oil from the deep end? You mean somebody MADE BP rush through safety procedures and denied inspection and didn't wait a full 48 hours for the cement to harden before drilling and causing the biggest oil spill in history because the government MADE them do it?? No, the government was so hapless that it didn't blink an eye until way too late. There was NO REGULATION on BP to stop the accident from happening in the first place!
@seanotube85 "Who forced oil rigs to pull oil from the deep end?"
That would be Obama you dipshit. The State authority of Louisiana had already approved a drilling site MUCH closer in land, where this disaster would have been easier to contain. FEDERAL REGULATORS, given the power to do so after Valdez, voided that apporval and sent them further out than ANYONE had experience dealing with.
BTW, Obama's sending Brazil $2 billion to do offshore drilling, TWICE as deep as this was.
@JRooster101 "The public option is medicare for all."—this sentence is stupidity in a bubble. It's an OPTION! That means it's NOT for anyone but those who CHOSE TO PAY FOR IT! People will pay for QUALITY. There is no competition among insurance companies because they have monopolized our health providers under their sickening practices. SHAME ON YOU FOR PROTECTING THEM! People pay right now and they're not getting shit for it, and they're losing all their money to these fucking evil companies!
@JRooster101 You've gotta be fucking kidding me... you're trying to tell me there was no value in the woman's rights movement, the civil rights movement or the labor movement? You're a fucking joker. Those were all progressive causes and those shaped this country. You're a fucking loser stuck in the past. If FDR's program was such a failure how come the important things that got passed are still around to this day? I suppose you're one of those idiots wants to do away with social security too?
@JRooster101 "A government monopoly on health care kills competition." The public option IS competition you poor stupid bastard. YOU are regressive because you want the same system to exist which has been failing us at exponentially increasing rates for YEARS! "The progressive policies of FDR extended the great depression by over 7 years"--Evidence?? "The free-market creates competition."--Is it a free market when super-corporations monopolize business? NO IT IS NOT! It's communism for the RICH!
@pimpdalyrical GM Takeover: good point. He should have let them fail so they could get paid bankruptcy and fire all their workers. "Obamacare"... Socialist?? Give me a fucking break. The government is not making money from anyone except the insurance company lobbyists who pay them off! Ya know who won on that deal? Your buddies over at the huge insurance corporations, that's who! Stimulus.. created thousands of jobs.. You're right, terrible idea.. "Bush was no conservative"—HAH! cut and run!LOL!
As opposed to sucking soo much money out of the free market that twice as many people lose their jobs? Yes, that would have been the better move. Bankruptcy would not mean GM would have vanished and laid off everybody. They would have kept most of their workers.
There's also these subtle differences between Controlling, and NON-controlling shares. Obama could have given GM the same amount of financial help, without getting involved over his head.
@pimpdalyrical The enormous amount of bankruptcy money still comes out of our taxes all the same. I'm sort of mixed on this issue anyways. GM is no longer an innovator in the automotive industry, and the Obama administration, after taking "control", didn't do much to change that. Pretty much weak sauce all around, there. But let's be honest with ourselves here: GM was putting ITSELF into the role of a fairly shitty enterprise BEFORE the market collapse in '08.
True, either way it was a waste of our money. Except one way leaves the company in the hands of people who understand the care business, and the other leaves decisions up to people with no experience in the industry, with none of their own money invested.
"GM was putting ITSELF into the role of a fairly shitty enterprise BEFORE the market collapse in '08."
Agreed. Which is why it should have to get itself out of trouble. THAT'S what capitalist conservatives wanted.
@pimpdalyrical If it went bankrupt the option to "get itself out of trouble" would be OVER. The company would go out of operation under a bankruptcy status because it cannot make payments to the bank to keep itself running.. So while the owners might leave with a fat paycheck, everyone else goes home without a job.
Bankruptcy does not mean the entire company evaporates numbnuts. Blockbuster video has filed for bankruptcy. You know what? I rented a movie there last night. It's just a protective measure from creditors that helps you fix the situation you're in. So that you can pay the bank first, and everybody else later. Like when republicans get power again and make sure it stays worth it to earn more money.
That's due to the invent of downloadable movies to flatscreen TV's and simpler services like Netflix, Redbox, and Blockbuster's own mail service (whom all those employees could go work for.)
Hell, they closed two Starbuck's near me. You think they're in bankruptcy?
The point is Blockbuster's obsolete in- store business plan should not be given life support by raiding my bank account and yours. They should be forced to adapt like every other business.
You're confusing IN-volunatary bankruptcy- Where creditors call for the liquidation of a company' assets- with Voluntary Bankruptcy, which is called for BY the company. Both Blockbuster, and the GM/Auto industry poblems were dealing with VOLUNTARY bankruptcy.
Basically, the company gets a court to arbitrate which of it's creditors need to be paid, and which can F-off til they're profitable again. It does not mean they have to liquify ALL their assets and payoff everybody.
@pimpdalyrical Yeah, they don't liquify ALL their assets, just a large portion of them. Like I said though, I'm a bit divided on this particular issue, cuz they're basically letting the same people make the same decisions to run the company into the dirt. They should have obviously changed that.And it's a shit company as far as I'm concerned. So they could have let it fail and put a lot of people out of a job on the down side, but teach the idiot administrators a lesson in failure on the upside.
Well yeah, that's why instead of bailing our a failed company, you let it suffer until somebody else takes over. Although I can't see any more logic in putting in somebody in charge who has no business experience whatsoever, let alone in the car industry, when the experts failed.
@pimpdalyrical I wouldn't say that means he's running the company, but I would call that a start. We need more products that depend on less gas/oil. Or better yet, we need products that don't depend on gas or oil at all. Energy dependence is what's holding us back from REAL progress on this planet.
Except for the fact that there is no gas/oil/ coal alternative that's viable yet. Well, and that Global Warming is a hoax, but that's beside the point.
Obama's administration is running the company. Their bail out was actually a purchase of the majority controlling shares in the company. That means they are the boss. As you pointed out, he's using that position to push his green agenda, instead of running a business. Hello money pit.
@pimpdalyrical More than 90% scientists agree on this: human-caused Global Warming is a FACT. If you don't believe it, replicate their experiments and find out for YOURSELVES! You'll get HUGE profits from oil companies if you CAN do this, so WHY would they hide it?? But besides that, it's not even ABOUT the environment. Do you have ANY idea how many trillions of dollars would be saved using ALTERNATIVE ENERGY? Oh, but it's a big waste of time/money to look into that. You fucking MORONS!!
" More than 90% scientists agree on this: human-caused Global Warming is a FACT."
Really? Name them. Certainly not the ones who had to sue to get their names taken off the debunked IPCC report, or all the others that simply have to relate their research to Global Warming to get grant money. Maybe if you didn't want to emit more water vapor instead of CO2. (H2O=95% worse greenhouse gas)
"Alternative" energy has cost jobs and wasted subsidies. It's not cost effective at all.
@pimpdalyrical Yes, without the IDIOT scientists who sued to get their names off the list, it's still more than 90%. "have to relate their research to Global Warming to get grant money."--You don't want to know whether or not Global Warming EXISTS?? That's the money scientists have been using to find out the TRUTH about global warming. What's so horrible about finding the truth? Want to replicate scientific experiment and prove them wrong? Then fucking DO IT! That's what the money's there for!
Idiots?. Or they have principles. Got a list of that other 90%?
It's going to be mostly researchers that have tied their unrelated study to Global warming, just to get their grant money. I know a guy studying insect nesting habits. He couldn't get funding until he agreed to present his findings as a study of how "Global Warming" effects them. That's how they get scientists on board, not because they're actually finding evidence of this BS.
@pimpdalyrical Water vapor is what keeps our greenhouse INTACT. Without water vapor, in other words, we would all be dead. Venus is too close to the sun—it has a much thicker atmosphere, because there's much more vapor, making it a very bad place to live. We have a BALANCE. Our carbon emissions are adding to the thickness of our atmosphere, and it has been PROVEN that this is responsible for heating our planet, causing MORE water vapor to rise into the atmosphere. It's now melting our ice caps!
95 % of the green house effect, the trapping of solar radiation within our atmosphere, is caused by Water vapor. Moron Greenies, who just want to do away with CO2 because of the crippling economic effect, have actually suggested and built cars that emit water vapor instead of C02. Which is a piss poor greenhouse gas. So their answer is for us to add a much WORSE greenhouse gas to the atmosphere.
@pimpdalyrical "Obama's administration is running the company." So, uhm.. which of the company owners exactly works for the Obama administration? Now THINK before you speak so you stop sounding like a damned fool.
@seanotube85 "So, uhm.. which of the company owners exactly works for the Obama administration?"
You do know that a corporation is owned by stock holder's right? The current majority stock holder in GM is the US government. Did you miss the part where he appointed a Car Czar? Where do you think he got the authority to fire GM's CEO? Maybe you should read Rattner's own book on the matter.
Sure it is. Except for the thousands of scientists not on anybody's payroll or requiring Government grants for research, and established chemistry that says it isn't. Don't believe anybody who claims they can decrease the Green House effect by replacing CO2 emissions with water vapor. They obviously haven't done their chemistry homework or studied the Greenhouse effect at all.
All they have ever proven, is that the climate changes, and it effects CO2. That's not causality.
All the national science academies have publicly affirmed anthropogenic global warming as a fact of science. But even though science says it, you always get a few goofballs who say "it be a conspiracy!". lol.
The science doesn't say it. Bought people in lab coats do. How much money do national science academies get from the government?
Give me one solution any of the green nazis have come up with that will actually decrease atmospheric CO2 levels at an efficient global level to alter the climate. (Let me save you some time, they have none.) Thankfully, the majority of human beings aren't as gullible as you, and your fearmongering will cause no real policy shifts.
yeah, yeah, "it's a conspiracy!" such a boring argument. you science-haters make me lol. u should stop questioning climate change science or else the men in black helicopters may show up and take you away.
Nope. I'm a scientist, not a creationist. You can't pigeon hole the true science of it all in theology just so you can dismiss it. Man made global warming is nothing but politicians fearmongering, scaring you gullible fucks into handing them more power.
It's the shrinking number of scientists who actually support this that have been bought, not the dissenters.
"it's a conspiracy!" that's all you've got, science-hater. it doesnt matter the national scientific academies have publicly accepted global warming as scientific fact, coz dubya dubya dubya lush limpbaugh dut cum says otherwise.
That's what you got? Pathetic. I'm a scientist by profession numbnuts. And no scientific academies even list CO2 as qualifying as a green house gas. Math and cold hard fact trump Al Bore and the socialists infecting academia. Look it up for yourself instead of listening to GEs Obama administration parrot network.
Do the homework, and see if you can explain for yourself how our contribution of CO2 could possibly effect the atmosphere.
"It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities ...human activities are now causing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases – including CARBON DIOXIDE..." signed and endorsed by national science academies of: USA, Canada, UK, Germany, Italy, France, Japan, Russia, Brazil, China, India.
@robocong7420 Signed by Governments. Gosh, their honesty and integrity could never be questioned. Show me the science, not the bullshit. Like heat coefficients: Water Vapor--4.1813 Methane--2.34 Nitrogen gas--1.040 Oxygen gas--.918 Aluminum--.897 CO2--.839 Show me one list of Greenhouse gases that lists Oxygen, or Aluminum, which transfers energy well enough to be used in power lines. You owned yourself thinking what others told you is evidence.
" no scientific academies even list CO2 as qualifying as a green house gas" ..said the dropout
"human activities are now causing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases – including CARBON DIOXIDE" ...said the national science academies of: USA, Canada, UK, Germany, Italy, France, Japan, Russia, Brazil, China and India.
"but it's a conspiracy!" ...said the dropout - owned
Pathetic You have one task. Explain the facts behind your opinion. All you can do is post a list of failing Leftist countries (and our own) who actively seek totalitarian power.
And that's a NO on explaining why we would replace emissions that only absorb photons of an infrared wavelength that barely hits the earth's surface with WATER VAPOR, when H2O is 90% of the greenhouse effect.
You are correct that H2O is the dominant GHG but you clearly have no idea about the direct relation between the amount of it and the temperature in the atmosphere.
You also doesn't seem know that increased amount of CO2 equals more H2O in the atmosphere and that causes the temperature to go up even further, a so called "positive feedback".
So drop your attitude you're in over your head, masters degree or not.
@checkcall123 Except CO2 increases have never correlated to increased water vapor. You're still assuming CO2 CAN warm the climate, when it can't. Swap H@O for CO2, we would freeze, not burn.
Co2 only abosrbs photons at a very specific wavelength of infrared, barely any of which ever reaches the surface of the earth to begin with. It also radiates energy as heat very well. . Do your own math, stop listening to the State media.
@pimpdalyrical lol just stop it, you can repeat the same lines as many times you want, it will not change the fact that have been PROVEN in studies, I don't understand how you can deny this.
"Swap H2O for CO2, we would freeze, not burn." really why is that?! Because CO2 would block out all heat and energy from the sun so it would never reach the surface of earth?
An enhanced greenhouse effect from CO2 has been confirmed by multiple lines of empirical evidence.
What's been proven in studies Checkcall? Do you even know? Do you even have the ability to look into this yourself?
CO2 dominating the atmosphere would make us freeze because it cant form the nice warm fuzzy blanket around the earth like Water vapor, oxygen, and Nitrogen do. Let alone how we would all suffocate to death long before the ratios were high enough to even effect climate.
But you wouldn't know that, you have to rely on what others tell you.
WHY do you repeat a lie over and over again (maybe someone told you? Because you obv. haven't looked into this yourself :)
Could you please explain why the planet Venus is the one planet with the highest avg. temperature in our solar system and Venus atmosphere consists of 96,5% Carbon dioxide, a hint it's not because it's close to the Sun because if that was the only factor Mercury would be the hottest planet.
That's the best you could do in an hour? Yes, it's because of how close it is to the Sun. Mercury is cooler, because it really doesn't have an atmosphere. MERCURY'S proximity to the Sun means it's atmosphere is literally blasted off the planet.
Did you skim over that part where Mars and Venus are going through consistent temperature fluxuations with the Earth, WITHOUT factories and SUV's on them? I know, it's almost like that giant ball of fire is driving the climate!
@pimpdalyrical HAHAHAHAHA you are insane. WHY DOES THE ATMOSPHERE MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE WHEN IT CONSISTS OF 96.5% CO2???? Thats the relevant part you needed to respond to.
God you are so brainwashed you can't even see when what you're saying contradicts itself, I swear you extrem RW'ers must have something missing in your DNA. It's like talking to a fucking wall no understanding of facts or evidence AT ALL...
Check, you can't be this stupid. Read the post. The reason it's hotter is the proximity to the heat source. If Venus had our atmosphere, it would be thousands of times hotter. The fact that a hotter planet is left with 96.5% of it's atmoshphere as CO2 tells anyone with a third grade education that obviously, CO2 CONDUCTS heat better than the other elements that were there, and boiled off. Since your theory relies on CO2 RETAINING heat, you are you're own worst evidence.
@checkcall123 Well what do you know, about 5 minutes of looking, turns out the galileo space prove tooke a look at Venus in infrared. That spectrum of light your theory needs that CO2 rich atmosphere to absorb from being released out into space. What do you think it saw. Nothing? Darkness, since no Infrared was getting by the thick layers of CO2. 4+ times as dense as our atmosphere? Put this in Google and see for youself.
@pimpdalyrical I give up Mr brick wall, you contradict yourself at least two times every comment, can't take it anymore. Go to skepticalscience or some shit like that, maybe you can find someone to explain this for you there.
HA HA HA! Ok loser. I'll take your inability to contemplate science as a need for ME to look some hack science blog. Thankfully the rest of the world is smarter than you, and can look into these things for themselves.
@checkcall123 Any clues as to why those other planets would warm the same way we are? No? Of course not. You just WANT to believe what you have been told. Can't fracture your fragile little leftist world view.
@checkcall123 Now since I have proven you're a fucking idiot, and don't even understand the theory you're such a believer in, why don't you just shut the fuck up and quit pretending to have value as a human being. Your attempt at hiding the fact you can't handle the necessary math to understand the topic was pathetic, by the way.
@pimpdalyrical Oh you're so funny! We are all lucky that brainless,clueless monkeys like you will never have anything to say about how we face this problem.
"necessary math" that's the point it has NOTHING to do with what we were talking about.
Begone stupid, republican, tyllernullish, uneducated, religious TROLL ignored.
(we all know you are not a scientists so stop pretending, do something with your life ffs...)
Ha! Math and Chemistry have nothing to do with the Global Warming debate???!!!
Thank you for making your ignorant, leftist talking point regurgitating opinion so obvious. I'll let the irony of YOU trying to insult anyone's intelligence speak for itself.
You're useless. Crawl back to your fantasy world where politicians can actually solve your problems for you.
@pimpdalyrical LOL like all retarded RW'ers you change the subject to something thats not relevant I understand, must be hard to be born stupid though.
The IRONY of you talking about fantasy world when it's so obvious you are a crazy religious person.
Not reading any more retarded jitter from you anymore, begone troll....
Ok moron, what's the topic? Global Warming? Yeah, that takes science. What else have I been talking about you useless turd?
All you have is the garbage that has been shoved down your throat. Like every other gullible leftist tool out there, you simply trust without verifying.
Thank God the vast majority of the country stopped doing that and have turned off MSNBC. You should do the same.
I thought I could block you but that wasn't possible:(, I have to read your stupid comments in my mail...
Must be nice to be as crazy as you, you sound like a holocaust denier...
FACTS>OPINIONS (you are not getting any kid's right?! World sure as hell doesn't need more inbreads like you!) There is something REALLY strange in RW'ers heads, no I mean it REALLY STRANGE!
Just delete it if you don't want to read it. You don't HAVE to. But let's be honest, you know you can't let go. You have been outed as a moron, and you're praying I'll just go away and not embarrass you anymore. Not gonna happen.
You will leave this discussion outed as the gullible leftist idiot you are, hiding behind meaningless rhetoric like "holocaust denier." Sure sign of having lost an argument.
OPINION = the wastes of oxygen you open wide and swallow without verifying, then spit back out thinking it means you know something.
"Maybe I will 'get' your 'science' if you keep on writing! lmao"
Yes, the idea that you could "get" science no matter how much is presented to you, makes me lmao too. Thanks for admitting you're too stupid. You can crawl away now.
@JRooster101 The military industrial complex is supported by congress.. they get paid off.. So does the president. Bobby Kennedy was against the war in Vietnam, but he got assassinated before he even got a chance to make a change for the better. The military industrial complex follows a strictly right-wing ideology. JFK was no saint. Neither is Obama. But both were/are pressured by the right wing military industrial complex.
Grayson also removed & disabled comments on ALL the video's of his dispicable commercial here on youtube!
Grayson is a lying, thieving, twisting, editing, deceiving, shameless, dispicable piece of Garbage!! He sure as hell can't run on what he's done so all he can do is make up blatant lies about his opponent! Typical Democrat! Vote him out Florida or hang your head in shame!
Liberals attack people like Beck and Limbaugh for "Quote mining" and taking democrats out of context. However they can never produce a single instance where a larger sample of the soundbite proved a different meaning to what was being said.
Yet, here we have a typical lib tactic, outwright lie, that will never make it on the supposedly "unbiased" big networks.
lol good point seanotube85. i like how instead of expanding on his ideals, grayson has to make attack adds that are totally ridiculous. what does the military have to do with this? perhaps we can also talk about obama and his government take over and increasing taxes? you make great points!!! moron.
its not about being right or left, its about being right or wrong!
The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin.
The Nation a Socialist Magazine has no creditability.
The fact that he wants to deny women the right to divorce their abusive spouse speaks a lot louder to me than him not outright commanding wives to submit to their husbands (it's up to them to submit after all, if they want to follow the bible word for word like a good little fundi, brainwashed midwives and get into heaven nice n clean). Cry me a f*'n river if Grayson's ad offends you by "taking Dan's words out of context." Read the facts and maybe wake up and smell the self-deception—God forbid!
@StoogeWatcher Notice how Dan does NOT tell women not to submit to their husbands in this? Notice how he mentions that it's in the bible that women should submit to their husbands while talking to a mostly fundamentalist audience? Furthermore, it's not a fake document, dummy. The document is real, but the fact that you're all up in a huff is because you don't want people to think of this guy as having an extreme ideology while he tries to deny rape victims medical aid. Sorry, can't have both.
@seanotube85 CBS was caught lying, moron. Fascist bitch Mary Mapes got fired. Alan Grayson is in desperation mode. He's trailing in polls. Liberals are the extremists who support animal rights nutjobs that firebomb research labs and anti-military "peace activists" who shoot soldiers and vandalize war memorials.
@StoogeWatcher You mean how the military has no common sense and how they don't check up on the mental state of their troops? I thought everyone knew that already... Oh, right, not idiots.. What "leftist sob stories"?? Do leftists control the military now according to you? hahahaha! lol! Sorry, you're STILL retarded!
"Do leftists control the military now according to you? "
Uh, the Commander in Chief and the Majority in both houses that control whether or not we're at war, are all controlled by leftists. So yes, leftists run the military.
@pimpdalyrical What the fuck is your definition of a leftist now? I thought you idiots thought tree-hugging hippies were leftists? Now it's pro-war militants? Make up your fucking minds! So you believe Obama, Congress, and the house of representatives were all conspiring to have some random crazy Muslim fuck go on a shooting rampage? That's STILL retarded! PLEASE pull your head out of your ass, moron!
10-2-10 is being co-sponsored adn organized by numerous communist and socialist groups. You can look it up for yourself, if you want to bother being correct about anything you say.
The tree hugging hippies are just useful idiots to the leftists who want power. You will give up your independence to them in the name of Environmentalism, Secularism, Egalitarianism, or "Social Justice." Either way, the people behind all the leftist movements don't have your best interest in mind.
@pimpdalyrical Do you suggest we start putting people on trial for being communists like we did in the McCarthy era? You ARE fucking retarded. I looked up the groups involved with the march.. which of them would you like to suggest are connected with Stalin? Which ones are looking out for the better interests of Fidel? lmfao! You're a fucking moron!
Who said anything like that? I just want the leftists to be honest about what they believe so it can be honestly debated. If you're a communist or a socialist, be upfront with it and lets compare ideas. The only reason to deny it or hide it, I think, is if your on the extreme and dark ends of leftist thought.
@pimpdalyrical Who do you believe is denying their true ideology? Obama? He's a fucking corporatist! So are all his Republican buddies and a few Democrats to boot! That's why this rally is happening in the first place! Because that sell-out is not delivering the change he delivered in the first place! And I notice how you mentioned NOTHING WHATSOEVER about the extreme and dark ends of Right-Wing thought (the reason why we keep going into all these wars IN THE FIRST PLACE!)
I know you’re there to protest that Obama hasn’t fleeced us enough, despite that the left turn he has taken us on has proven to be the wrong direction already. Somehow, you also missed that these groups support the same ideology that naturally leads to Stalin style human rights horrors:
@pimpdalyrical The ones you call "hippies" (a.k.a. left leaning protesters) and the ones who want power in the form of war profits, environmental hazard profits, etc., are OBVIOUSLY against one another. That's why people are PROTESTING how WEAK the Obama administration has been so far! Name one progressive thing Obama has done.. And don't go to his health care plan because NOBODY wanted that piece of crap of a bill. Stimulus maybe? That's it!
What's not "Progressive" about ramming a healthcare blll down our throats? All I ever hear from progressives that we all should be forced to live under their opinion on Family, Life, and reace relations. I fyou don't, you're just a hate filled racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe. Judicial activism? Ever heard of that? That's a "progressive" concept.
Also, taking control of GM is pretty damn socialist progressive.
@pimpdalyrical GM was collapsing under its own weight! They SOLD THEMSELVES to the government. The government didn't just annex GM. "What's not "Progressive" about ramming a healthcare blll down our throats?"—this question demonstrates that you know NOTHING about progressives, and I don't entirely blame you either considering your being brainwashed by Glenn Beck and Fox "News." The Public Option was a progressive bill because it gave Americans choice and opportunity for affordable health care.
Sefl described "Progressives" Wilson and Roosevelt were big government asswipes too. It's nothing new. Maybe you don't realize it, but having regulation forced upon you is what you're asking for. It's just liberalism in a fancy new dress, which is socialism anyway. The only people who don't understand the true goals of the liberal "Progressive" agenda are the ones who vote for it. Hell, tey actually think Obama's low polling is due to the things he HASN'T done.
@pimpdalyrical Yeah? well Abraham Lincoln was pretty cool, and he was a Republican.. oh how the times change.. Ya, regulation would be a HORRIBLE thing in this time where corporations own most of congress and have virtually NO regulations.. "new dress, which is socialism anyway." Stop watching Glenn Beck you retarded fucking zombie fucktard! "Hell, tey actually think Obama's low polling is due to the things he HASN'T done." Name a bill he's passed that was NOT conservative leaning ya dumb fuck!
"corporations own most of congress and have virtually NO regulations."
If only reality shared your view. Try opening your own business, try drowning in red tape and regulations for a year.
The Regulations aren't meant to make it harder for Congress' corporate owners. Government will ALWAYS be corruptable with money. That's why you're supposed to keep what they can do LIMITED. You really think Big Gov. is for the little guy, don't you? Jesus Christ!!!
@pimpdalyrical "You really think Big Gov. is for the little guy, don't you?" Uhhh.. no. Where was it I said this?? I believe I said the exact opposite thing. Not too quick are ya? Government is mostly for the BIG GUY, which is why you should keep THEM limited, using LAWS AND REGULATIONS that keep them from taking advantage of and manipulating congress! JESUS CHRIST ALMIGHTY! LMAO!
Good God Seanotube. There will always be big guys, as long as Government has useful amounts of power for sale. The ONLY way for corporations to become the all encompassing evil you are paranoid of, is for the government to gain more control over the market place. There's only one reason to do that, so they can turn around and sell it. Youre handing them their outlet, and you're too stupid to see it.
@pimpdalyrical "communist sponsored rally"--who's a communist sponsoring what rally? Please think before you speak... But of course you won't, so this should be entertaining..
volcom you're an idiot! He didn't say pick out the ones you don't like MORON. He said, pick out the ones that apply to YOU. In other words, men you pick out the verses that tell you to love your wife as Christ loved the church, let your wife worry about the verses directed at wives and let her pray on those.
@volcombillx3 -- You mean like how Grayson picked only the phrases that Webster uttered, and cut out the rest so as to make it look like he meant the exact opposite of what he was actually saying? Seriously, dude. The fact that you'd make that *one* particular argument in the context of THIS video tells me you must be a fucking idiot all the way around. You've completely 'missed the plot', as they say.
@rovibe No I caught the plot and I called it how it is. Yes Grayson's add was a play on his words but the point of the add was totally legitimate. Crazy ass conservative Christians want America to be a theocracy, and Taliban Dan is one of them. Do you even get the "Taliban Dan" line? Cuz i think you missed the plot.
But my point was that conservatives like to pick things out of the bible to run campaigns and legislate with. You know what the bible says about eating shrimp and lobster?
Webster bills TALK AND THEY ARE IN WRITING. The liar is Webster. Grayson just demonstrated in his ad that Webster tells the opposite of what he puts in WRITING. Webster Bills says : "YOU SHOULD SUBMIT TO ME" and Webster tells the opposite of what he WRITES just to look appealing to husbands and women.
@1samothrace77 sounds like YOU'RE the idiot. I guess maybe they shouldn't read that part of the bible. Maybe they should just throw those verses out. He said that men should worry about the verses directed to them and women should do the same and they should pray about those verses.
He never denied that she shouldn't submit. Just that he wouldn't "pick" those verses for her and just use the ones he is supposed to do. He even gave a slight chuckle after saying that.
@AmericanNohbuddy You're right he said it's "in the bible BUT" with an unoppositional tone and "she can pray that if she wants to". Thanks for pointing it out. So it's not as bad of a lie as I originally thought, but it's still a very bad lie by Grayson's team.
Submit to me.
sugmegpls 4 months ago
BTW, Global climate change is happening. The polar ice caps are melting, so the climate is changing. Some places are getting hotter, some are getting colder, but the water levels are very likely to rise and all I can say is my house will be underwater. Yay expensive Florida properties. If you haven't heard, the oil fields in the arctic are being explored to be opened up. Yay! its raining money thanks to global warming being a "hoax"!
chuckotronic 1 year ago
So basically Christians PICK AND CHOOSE WHAT TO BELEIVE IN THE BIBLE... Thank you Mr. Webster. I'm glad you said that. Now I know why all Churches are Hypocritical by nature.
chuckotronic 1 year ago
@chuckotronic He is talking about what to pray about with someone else. He did not say those other verses were not true.
SaudaraLink 1 year ago
@SaudaraLink Regardless of what he didn't say about truth, he's acknowledging bigoted verses and otherwise not so bigoted scripts that are controversial. I think that glossing over them is wrong, and we can't be "fair-weathered" about our faith, if you understand my meaning. Obviously people want to put a positive face on an archaic faith to make it seem like a friendly, loving, and accepting religion, which is the face I like, but nonetheless is untrue to reality. Thanks though.
chuckotronic 1 year ago
bush cheney rove rummy rice LOVE webster
ryanshaunkelly 1 year ago
Comment removed
seanotube85 1 year ago
@JRooster101 Please, please stop making me feel sorry for you. It's well-known fact that they STOLE money from Social Security to pay for their bad mistakes.
seanotube85 1 year ago
@JRooster101 I think you need to look up regressive. It describes your cause more than anyones, dickhead.
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
No, going back to big government high tax-and spend policy is a regression in American policy. A mistake we seem to keep repeating no matter how many times it failed. Not to mention, the founding principles our successful experiment of a country were founded on, are in opposition to the failed socialist monarchies that came before it. "Spreading the wealth around ut of fairness" isn't a new scam.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@JRooster101 And stop calling Obama a fucking messiah. That's how dick head brainwashed conservatives think. And they pumped it through the media from day one! And now it's stuck in your pathetic little head that people were looking for a messiah, when all they really wanted was change in Washington. But you couldn't grapple with that for the life of you because you support the puppet on the right and retardedly believe I bow down and worship the puppet on the left.
seanotube85 1 year ago
@JRooster101 HAHAHA. Oh please! Conservatives fought TOOTH AND NAIL to stop the civil rights act! You think the KKK was liberal??? YOU'RE A FUCKING MORON! Okay, FDR's internment camps were fucked up. But how about Richard Nixon's "War on Drugs" (not to mention Watergate) which still is useless and has been proven useless time and time again! But I bet YOU still fucking support that, don't you? SS is broke because the Bush STOLE our money to pay for the war in Iraq dumb ass! YOU FAIL!
seanotube85 1 year ago
Hey everybody! It's TALIBAN DAN!!!
HUMANSAREBENEATHME 1 year ago
@JRooster101
Hell, Seanotube's favorite politicians just gathered to honor a man who filibustered the civil rights act!
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@JRooster101 Who forced oil rigs to pull oil from the deep end? You mean somebody MADE BP rush through safety procedures and denied inspection and didn't wait a full 48 hours for the cement to harden before drilling and causing the biggest oil spill in history because the government MADE them do it?? No, the government was so hapless that it didn't blink an eye until way too late. There was NO REGULATION on BP to stop the accident from happening in the first place!
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85 "Who forced oil rigs to pull oil from the deep end?"
That would be Obama you dipshit. The State authority of Louisiana had already approved a drilling site MUCH closer in land, where this disaster would have been easier to contain. FEDERAL REGULATORS, given the power to do so after Valdez, voided that apporval and sent them further out than ANYONE had experience dealing with.
BTW, Obama's sending Brazil $2 billion to do offshore drilling, TWICE as deep as this was.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@JRooster101 "The public option is medicare for all."—this sentence is stupidity in a bubble. It's an OPTION! That means it's NOT for anyone but those who CHOSE TO PAY FOR IT! People will pay for QUALITY. There is no competition among insurance companies because they have monopolized our health providers under their sickening practices. SHAME ON YOU FOR PROTECTING THEM! People pay right now and they're not getting shit for it, and they're losing all their money to these fucking evil companies!
seanotube85 1 year ago
@JRooster101 You've gotta be fucking kidding me... you're trying to tell me there was no value in the woman's rights movement, the civil rights movement or the labor movement? You're a fucking joker. Those were all progressive causes and those shaped this country. You're a fucking loser stuck in the past. If FDR's program was such a failure how come the important things that got passed are still around to this day? I suppose you're one of those idiots wants to do away with social security too?
seanotube85 1 year ago
@JRooster101 "A government monopoly on health care kills competition." The public option IS competition you poor stupid bastard. YOU are regressive because you want the same system to exist which has been failing us at exponentially increasing rates for YEARS! "The progressive policies of FDR extended the great depression by over 7 years"--Evidence?? "The free-market creates competition."--Is it a free market when super-corporations monopolize business? NO IT IS NOT! It's communism for the RICH!
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85 "Name a bill he's passed that was NOT conservative leaning ya dumb fuck!"
Are you serious? Are you sure which side you're on!
Car company bailouts and GM takeover: Socialist not conservative. Conservatism says let them fail.
Obamacare: Socialist not conservative
Stimulus bill, taking money out of the market, and blowing half of it, to help the market with. Definitely not conservative.
Bush was no conservative. If you're basing this on him, you have your head up your ass.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical GM Takeover: good point. He should have let them fail so they could get paid bankruptcy and fire all their workers. "Obamacare"... Socialist?? Give me a fucking break. The government is not making money from anyone except the insurance company lobbyists who pay them off! Ya know who won on that deal? Your buddies over at the huge insurance corporations, that's who! Stimulus.. created thousands of jobs.. You're right, terrible idea.. "Bush was no conservative"—HAH! cut and run!LOL!
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
As opposed to sucking soo much money out of the free market that twice as many people lose their jobs? Yes, that would have been the better move. Bankruptcy would not mean GM would have vanished and laid off everybody. They would have kept most of their workers.
There's also these subtle differences between Controlling, and NON-controlling shares. Obama could have given GM the same amount of financial help, without getting involved over his head.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical The enormous amount of bankruptcy money still comes out of our taxes all the same. I'm sort of mixed on this issue anyways. GM is no longer an innovator in the automotive industry, and the Obama administration, after taking "control", didn't do much to change that. Pretty much weak sauce all around, there. But let's be honest with ourselves here: GM was putting ITSELF into the role of a fairly shitty enterprise BEFORE the market collapse in '08.
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
True, either way it was a waste of our money. Except one way leaves the company in the hands of people who understand the care business, and the other leaves decisions up to people with no experience in the industry, with none of their own money invested.
"GM was putting ITSELF into the role of a fairly shitty enterprise BEFORE the market collapse in '08."
Agreed. Which is why it should have to get itself out of trouble. THAT'S what capitalist conservatives wanted.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical If it went bankrupt the option to "get itself out of trouble" would be OVER. The company would go out of operation under a bankruptcy status because it cannot make payments to the bank to keep itself running.. So while the owners might leave with a fat paycheck, everyone else goes home without a job.
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
Bankruptcy does not mean the entire company evaporates numbnuts. Blockbuster video has filed for bankruptcy. You know what? I rented a movie there last night. It's just a protective measure from creditors that helps you fix the situation you're in. So that you can pay the bank first, and everybody else later. Like when republicans get power again and make sure it stays worth it to earn more money.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical Well all the blockbusters in my city have officially shut down... hmm.. how about that?
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
That's due to the invent of downloadable movies to flatscreen TV's and simpler services like Netflix, Redbox, and Blockbuster's own mail service (whom all those employees could go work for.)
Hell, they closed two Starbuck's near me. You think they're in bankruptcy?
The point is Blockbuster's obsolete in- store business plan should not be given life support by raiding my bank account and yours. They should be forced to adapt like every other business.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical So where does the bankruptcy money come from?
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
You're confusing IN-volunatary bankruptcy- Where creditors call for the liquidation of a company' assets- with Voluntary Bankruptcy, which is called for BY the company. Both Blockbuster, and the GM/Auto industry poblems were dealing with VOLUNTARY bankruptcy.
Basically, the company gets a court to arbitrate which of it's creditors need to be paid, and which can F-off til they're profitable again. It does not mean they have to liquify ALL their assets and payoff everybody.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical Yeah, they don't liquify ALL their assets, just a large portion of them. Like I said though, I'm a bit divided on this particular issue, cuz they're basically letting the same people make the same decisions to run the company into the dirt. They should have obviously changed that.And it's a shit company as far as I'm concerned. So they could have let it fail and put a lot of people out of a job on the down side, but teach the idiot administrators a lesson in failure on the upside.
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
Well yeah, that's why instead of bailing our a failed company, you let it suffer until somebody else takes over. Although I can't see any more logic in putting in somebody in charge who has no business experience whatsoever, let alone in the car industry, when the experts failed.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical I'm pretty sure the same old "experts" are still running GM. That's the problem.
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
Nope. Obama is. didn't you see him debut that crappy electric car?
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical I wouldn't say that means he's running the company, but I would call that a start. We need more products that depend on less gas/oil. Or better yet, we need products that don't depend on gas or oil at all. Energy dependence is what's holding us back from REAL progress on this planet.
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
Except for the fact that there is no gas/oil/ coal alternative that's viable yet. Well, and that Global Warming is a hoax, but that's beside the point.
Obama's administration is running the company. Their bail out was actually a purchase of the majority controlling shares in the company. That means they are the boss. As you pointed out, he's using that position to push his green agenda, instead of running a business. Hello money pit.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical More than 90% scientists agree on this: human-caused Global Warming is a FACT. If you don't believe it, replicate their experiments and find out for YOURSELVES! You'll get HUGE profits from oil companies if you CAN do this, so WHY would they hide it?? But besides that, it's not even ABOUT the environment. Do you have ANY idea how many trillions of dollars would be saved using ALTERNATIVE ENERGY? Oh, but it's a big waste of time/money to look into that. You fucking MORONS!!
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
" More than 90% scientists agree on this: human-caused Global Warming is a FACT."
Really? Name them. Certainly not the ones who had to sue to get their names taken off the debunked IPCC report, or all the others that simply have to relate their research to Global Warming to get grant money. Maybe if you didn't want to emit more water vapor instead of CO2. (H2O=95% worse greenhouse gas)
"Alternative" energy has cost jobs and wasted subsidies. It's not cost effective at all.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical Yes, without the IDIOT scientists who sued to get their names off the list, it's still more than 90%. "have to relate their research to Global Warming to get grant money."--You don't want to know whether or not Global Warming EXISTS?? That's the money scientists have been using to find out the TRUTH about global warming. What's so horrible about finding the truth? Want to replicate scientific experiment and prove them wrong? Then fucking DO IT! That's what the money's there for!
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
Idiots?. Or they have principles. Got a list of that other 90%?
It's going to be mostly researchers that have tied their unrelated study to Global warming, just to get their grant money. I know a guy studying insect nesting habits. He couldn't get funding until he agreed to present his findings as a study of how "Global Warming" effects them. That's how they get scientists on board, not because they're actually finding evidence of this BS.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical Water vapor is what keeps our greenhouse INTACT. Without water vapor, in other words, we would all be dead. Venus is too close to the sun—it has a much thicker atmosphere, because there's much more vapor, making it a very bad place to live. We have a BALANCE. Our carbon emissions are adding to the thickness of our atmosphere, and it has been PROVEN that this is responsible for heating our planet, causing MORE water vapor to rise into the atmosphere. It's now melting our ice caps!
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
I guess I need to slow down.
95 % of the green house effect, the trapping of solar radiation within our atmosphere, is caused by Water vapor. Moron Greenies, who just want to do away with CO2 because of the crippling economic effect, have actually suggested and built cars that emit water vapor instead of C02. Which is a piss poor greenhouse gas. So their answer is for us to add a much WORSE greenhouse gas to the atmosphere.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical "Obama's administration is running the company." So, uhm.. which of the company owners exactly works for the Obama administration? Now THINK before you speak so you stop sounding like a damned fool.
seanotube85 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@seanotube85 "So, uhm.. which of the company owners exactly works for the Obama administration?"
You do know that a corporation is owned by stock holder's right? The current majority stock holder in GM is the US government. Did you miss the part where he appointed a Car Czar? Where do you think he got the authority to fire GM's CEO? Maybe you should read Rattner's own book on the matter.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical
global warming is indisputable modern science. dont believe everything you read on christian republican websites.
robocong7420 1 year ago
@robocong7420
Sure it is. Except for the thousands of scientists not on anybody's payroll or requiring Government grants for research, and established chemistry that says it isn't. Don't believe anybody who claims they can decrease the Green House effect by replacing CO2 emissions with water vapor. They obviously haven't done their chemistry homework or studied the Greenhouse effect at all.
All they have ever proven, is that the climate changes, and it effects CO2. That's not causality.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical
All the national science academies have publicly affirmed anthropogenic global warming as a fact of science. But even though science says it, you always get a few goofballs who say "it be a conspiracy!". lol.
robocong7420 1 year ago
@robocong7420
The science doesn't say it. Bought people in lab coats do. How much money do national science academies get from the government?
Give me one solution any of the green nazis have come up with that will actually decrease atmospheric CO2 levels at an efficient global level to alter the climate. (Let me save you some time, they have none.) Thankfully, the majority of human beings aren't as gullible as you, and your fearmongering will cause no real policy shifts.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical
yeah, yeah, "it's a conspiracy!" such a boring argument. you science-haters make me lol. u should stop questioning climate change science or else the men in black helicopters may show up and take you away.
robocong7420 1 year ago
@robocong7420
Do the science for yourself, kid. I'm not the one paranoid about impossible floods and acid rain becausenot enough people don't drive a hybrid.
Look out, there's a CO2 spewing monster right behind you, oh wait. That's just another person.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical
next thing youll tell me the earth is 6000 years old and evolution never happened
robocong7420 1 year ago
@robocong7420
Nope. I'm a scientist, not a creationist. You can't pigeon hole the true science of it all in theology just so you can dismiss it. Man made global warming is nothing but politicians fearmongering, scaring you gullible fucks into handing them more power.
It's the shrinking number of scientists who actually support this that have been bought, not the dissenters.
But you earned your DNC paycheck, go collect.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical
"it's a conspiracy!" that's all you've got, science-hater. it doesnt matter the national scientific academies have publicly accepted global warming as scientific fact, coz dubya dubya dubya lush limpbaugh dut cum says otherwise.
robocong7420 1 year ago
@robocong7420
"Science hater"
That's what you got? Pathetic. I'm a scientist by profession numbnuts. And no scientific academies even list CO2 as qualifying as a green house gas. Math and cold hard fact trump Al Bore and the socialists infecting academia. Look it up for yourself instead of listening to GEs Obama administration parrot network.
Do the homework, and see if you can explain for yourself how our contribution of CO2 could possibly effect the atmosphere.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical
"It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities ...human activities are now causing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases – including CARBON DIOXIDE..." signed and endorsed by national science academies of: USA, Canada, UK, Germany, Italy, France, Japan, Russia, Brazil, China, India.
-owned
robocong7420 1 year ago
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical
" no scientific academies even list CO2 as qualifying as a green house gas" ..said the dropout
"human activities are now causing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases – including CARBON DIOXIDE" ...said the national science academies of: USA, Canada, UK, Germany, Italy, France, Japan, Russia, Brazil, China and India.
"but it's a conspiracy!" ...said the dropout - owned
robocong7420 1 year ago
@robocong7420
Pathetic You have one task. Explain the facts behind your opinion. All you can do is post a list of failing Leftist countries (and our own) who actively seek totalitarian power.
And that's a NO on explaining why we would replace emissions that only absorb photons of an infrared wavelength that barely hits the earth's surface with WATER VAPOR, when H2O is 90% of the greenhouse effect.
Maybe if you repeat it again, it will matter.
Douche Greenie FAIL - Robo the nobody.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical Wow let me guess you watch Glenn Beck A LOT?!
" All you can do is post a list of failing Leftist countries (and our own) who actively seek totalitarian power." Amazing quote, just amazing...
checkcall123 1 year ago
@checkcall123
Yes, but actually my information comes from a master's degree in organic chemistry.
Nothing better to ad? OK then. Good post. See ya round the DNC blogosphere.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical Makes it even more amazing...
You are correct that H2O is the dominant GHG but you clearly have no idea about the direct relation between the amount of it and the temperature in the atmosphere.
You also doesn't seem know that increased amount of CO2 equals more H2O in the atmosphere and that causes the temperature to go up even further, a so called "positive feedback".
So drop your attitude you're in over your head, masters degree or not.
checkcall123 1 year ago
@checkcall123 Except CO2 increases have never correlated to increased water vapor. You're still assuming CO2 CAN warm the climate, when it can't. Swap H@O for CO2, we would freeze, not burn.
Co2 only abosrbs photons at a very specific wavelength of infrared, barely any of which ever reaches the surface of the earth to begin with. It also radiates energy as heat very well. . Do your own math, stop listening to the State media.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical lol just stop it, you can repeat the same lines as many times you want, it will not change the fact that have been PROVEN in studies, I don't understand how you can deny this.
"Swap H2O for CO2, we would freeze, not burn." really why is that?! Because CO2 would block out all heat and energy from the sun so it would never reach the surface of earth?
An enhanced greenhouse effect from CO2 has been confirmed by multiple lines of empirical evidence.
checkcall123 1 year ago
@checkcall123
What's been proven in studies Checkcall? Do you even know? Do you even have the ability to look into this yourself?
CO2 dominating the atmosphere would make us freeze because it cant form the nice warm fuzzy blanket around the earth like Water vapor, oxygen, and Nitrogen do. Let alone how we would all suffocate to death long before the ratios were high enough to even effect climate.
But you wouldn't know that, you have to rely on what others tell you.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical ...
WHY do you repeat a lie over and over again (maybe someone told you? Because you obv. haven't looked into this yourself :)
Could you please explain why the planet Venus is the one planet with the highest avg. temperature in our solar system and Venus atmosphere consists of 96,5% Carbon dioxide, a hint it's not because it's close to the Sun because if that was the only factor Mercury would be the hottest planet.
checkcall123 1 year ago
@checkcall123
That's the best you could do in an hour? Yes, it's because of how close it is to the Sun. Mercury is cooler, because it really doesn't have an atmosphere. MERCURY'S proximity to the Sun means it's atmosphere is literally blasted off the planet.
Did you skim over that part where Mars and Venus are going through consistent temperature fluxuations with the Earth, WITHOUT factories and SUV's on them? I know, it's almost like that giant ball of fire is driving the climate!
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical HAHAHAHAHA you are insane. WHY DOES THE ATMOSPHERE MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE WHEN IT CONSISTS OF 96.5% CO2???? Thats the relevant part you needed to respond to.
God you are so brainwashed you can't even see when what you're saying contradicts itself, I swear you extrem RW'ers must have something missing in your DNA. It's like talking to a fucking wall no understanding of facts or evidence AT ALL...
checkcall123 1 year ago
@checkcall123
Check, you can't be this stupid. Read the post. The reason it's hotter is the proximity to the heat source. If Venus had our atmosphere, it would be thousands of times hotter. The fact that a hotter planet is left with 96.5% of it's atmoshphere as CO2 tells anyone with a third grade education that obviously, CO2 CONDUCTS heat better than the other elements that were there, and boiled off. Since your theory relies on CO2 RETAINING heat, you are you're own worst evidence.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@checkcall123 Well what do you know, about 5 minutes of looking, turns out the galileo space prove tooke a look at Venus in infrared. That spectrum of light your theory needs that CO2 rich atmosphere to absorb from being released out into space. What do you think it saw. Nothing? Darkness, since no Infrared was getting by the thick layers of CO2. 4+ times as dense as our atmosphere? Put this in Google and see for youself.
Venus_clouds_Galileo_Color_PIA00124 JPEG
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical I give up Mr brick wall, you contradict yourself at least two times every comment, can't take it anymore. Go to skepticalscience or some shit like that, maybe you can find someone to explain this for you there.
checkcall123 1 year ago
@checkcall123
HA HA HA! Ok loser. I'll take your inability to contemplate science as a need for ME to look some hack science blog. Thankfully the rest of the world is smarter than you, and can look into these things for themselves.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@checkcall123 Any clues as to why those other planets would warm the same way we are? No? Of course not. You just WANT to believe what you have been told. Can't fracture your fragile little leftist world view.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@checkcall123
Look, I'll do the 12th grade algebra for you. .
You can look this up for yourself, it's a formula for determining elemental conductivity, using heat coefficients (how well an element retains heat)
Amount of Heat Energy (Q) = cm(T1 - T2).
c = the specific heat coefficient, m = mass, T1 - T2 = change in temperature.
C for CO2 = .839
C for Nitrogen (70% of atmosphere) = 1.04
Pesky Newton and his laws of thermodynamics. He must have been paid by Exxon!
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical lmao nice C a P, this isn't relevant to my comment at all, now answer the question about Venus 96,5% CO2 atmosphere.
checkcall123 1 year ago
@checkcall123 Now since I have proven you're a fucking idiot, and don't even understand the theory you're such a believer in, why don't you just shut the fuck up and quit pretending to have value as a human being. Your attempt at hiding the fact you can't handle the necessary math to understand the topic was pathetic, by the way.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical Oh you're so funny! We are all lucky that brainless,clueless monkeys like you will never have anything to say about how we face this problem.
"necessary math" that's the point it has NOTHING to do with what we were talking about.
Begone stupid, republican, tyllernullish, uneducated, religious TROLL ignored.
(we all know you are not a scientists so stop pretending, do something with your life ffs...)
checkcall123 1 year ago
@checkcall123
Ha! Math and Chemistry have nothing to do with the Global Warming debate???!!!
Thank you for making your ignorant, leftist talking point regurgitating opinion so obvious. I'll let the irony of YOU trying to insult anyone's intelligence speak for itself.
You're useless. Crawl back to your fantasy world where politicians can actually solve your problems for you.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical LOL like all retarded RW'ers you change the subject to something thats not relevant I understand, must be hard to be born stupid though.
The IRONY of you talking about fantasy world when it's so obvious you are a crazy religious person.
Not reading any more retarded jitter from you anymore, begone troll....
checkcall123 1 year ago
@checkcall123
Ok moron, what's the topic? Global Warming? Yeah, that takes science. What else have I been talking about you useless turd?
All you have is the garbage that has been shoved down your throat. Like every other gullible leftist tool out there, you simply trust without verifying.
Thank God the vast majority of the country stopped doing that and have turned off MSNBC. You should do the same.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical Endless stupidity... You will never understand why either, funny!
LEAVE ME ALONE NOW PLEASE.
checkcall123 1 year ago
@checkcall123
What happened to not reading anymore of my posts?
You'll be left alone when you stop posting your idiotic regurgitated opinion. BS will never go unchallenged.
You're a believer in Global Warming, because of who told you that you should be, not because you know what you're talking about, and I proved it.
Try and project your ignorance on to me all you want, you fool no one.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical OK you 'sane' one!
I thought I could block you but that wasn't possible:(, I have to read your stupid comments in my mail...
Must be nice to be as crazy as you, you sound like a holocaust denier...
FACTS>OPINIONS (you are not getting any kid's right?! World sure as hell doesn't need more inbreads like you!) There is something REALLY strange in RW'ers heads, no I mean it REALLY STRANGE!
checkcall123 1 year ago
@checkcall123
Just delete it if you don't want to read it. You don't HAVE to. But let's be honest, you know you can't let go. You have been outed as a moron, and you're praying I'll just go away and not embarrass you anymore. Not gonna happen.
You will leave this discussion outed as the gullible leftist idiot you are, hiding behind meaningless rhetoric like "holocaust denier." Sure sign of having lost an argument.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical Holy shit, are you a (idiot)bot?!
Your stupidity is really only matched by TyllerNull on YT, and thats really something to be proud of!
LOL at me being leftist, can you be more DUMB?!?!
Not responding any more now, but please don't you stop with the comments. Maybe I will 'get' your 'science' if you keep on writing! lmao
FACTS>OPINIONS
checkcall123 1 year ago
@checkcall123
FACTS= Math and science, which you lack.
OPINION = the wastes of oxygen you open wide and swallow without verifying, then spit back out thinking it means you know something.
"Maybe I will 'get' your 'science' if you keep on writing! lmao"
Yes, the idea that you could "get" science no matter how much is presented to you, makes me lmao too. Thanks for admitting you're too stupid. You can crawl away now.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical Submit to me. Its in the bible. Submit to me.
sugmegpls 9 months ago
@sugmegpls
You're not God twerp.
pimpdalyrical 9 months ago
Check out "Alan Grayson ad against american taliban Daniel Webster" by Vogter2100 on youtube and give this liberal sack of excrement the business.
borntobewilder9 1 year ago
@JRooster101 The military industrial complex is supported by congress.. they get paid off.. So does the president. Bobby Kennedy was against the war in Vietnam, but he got assassinated before he even got a chance to make a change for the better. The military industrial complex follows a strictly right-wing ideology. JFK was no saint. Neither is Obama. But both were/are pressured by the right wing military industrial complex.
seanotube85 1 year ago
Grayson also removed & disabled comments on ALL the video's of his dispicable commercial here on youtube!
Grayson is a lying, thieving, twisting, editing, deceiving, shameless, dispicable piece of Garbage!! He sure as hell can't run on what he's done so all he can do is make up blatant lies about his opponent! Typical Democrat! Vote him out Florida or hang your head in shame!
flyboymd82 1 year ago
Grayson is a big fat LIAR !!!!!!
bootjackjenny 1 year ago
Liberals attack people like Beck and Limbaugh for "Quote mining" and taking democrats out of context. However they can never produce a single instance where a larger sample of the soundbite proved a different meaning to what was being said.
Yet, here we have a typical lib tactic, outwright lie, that will never make it on the supposedly "unbiased" big networks.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
lol good point seanotube85. i like how instead of expanding on his ideals, grayson has to make attack adds that are totally ridiculous. what does the military have to do with this? perhaps we can also talk about obama and his government take over and increasing taxes? you make great points!!! moron.
its not about being right or left, its about being right or wrong!
blakerw87 1 year ago
Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble
Sean Trende 9-9-1
The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin.
The Nation a Socialist Magazine has no creditability.
crusades0917 1 year ago 2
hmm a 50 second snippet from a 15 minutes long speech...
deathiswaitin 1 year ago
Alan Grayson is desperate.
StoogeWatcher 1 year ago
The fact that he wants to deny women the right to divorce their abusive spouse speaks a lot louder to me than him not outright commanding wives to submit to their husbands (it's up to them to submit after all, if they want to follow the bible word for word like a good little fundi, brainwashed midwives and get into heaven nice n clean). Cry me a f*'n river if Grayson's ad offends you by "taking Dan's words out of context." Read the facts and maybe wake up and smell the self-deception—God forbid!
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85 What do liberals know about facts? They're still defending the CBS fake documents.
StoogeWatcher 1 year ago 2
@StoogeWatcher Notice how Dan does NOT tell women not to submit to their husbands in this? Notice how he mentions that it's in the bible that women should submit to their husbands while talking to a mostly fundamentalist audience? Furthermore, it's not a fake document, dummy. The document is real, but the fact that you're all up in a huff is because you don't want people to think of this guy as having an extreme ideology while he tries to deny rape victims medical aid. Sorry, can't have both.
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85 CBS was caught lying, moron. Fascist bitch Mary Mapes got fired. Alan Grayson is in desperation mode. He's trailing in polls. Liberals are the extremists who support animal rights nutjobs that firebomb research labs and anti-military "peace activists" who shoot soldiers and vandalize war memorials.
StoogeWatcher 1 year ago
@StoogeWatcher Nobody supports those people you stupid retard. hahahaha! lmfao!
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85 How do you retarded leftists explain the leftist sob stories for radical Islamists like the Fort Hood assassin?
StoogeWatcher 1 year ago
@StoogeWatcher You mean how the military has no common sense and how they don't check up on the mental state of their troops? I thought everyone knew that already... Oh, right, not idiots.. What "leftist sob stories"?? Do leftists control the military now according to you? hahahaha! lol! Sorry, you're STILL retarded!
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
"Do leftists control the military now according to you? "
Uh, the Commander in Chief and the Majority in both houses that control whether or not we're at war, are all controlled by leftists. So yes, leftists run the military.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical What the fuck is your definition of a leftist now? I thought you idiots thought tree-hugging hippies were leftists? Now it's pro-war militants? Make up your fucking minds! So you believe Obama, Congress, and the house of representatives were all conspiring to have some random crazy Muslim fuck go on a shooting rampage? That's STILL retarded! PLEASE pull your head out of your ass, moron!
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
10-2-10 is being co-sponsored adn organized by numerous communist and socialist groups. You can look it up for yourself, if you want to bother being correct about anything you say.
The tree hugging hippies are just useful idiots to the leftists who want power. You will give up your independence to them in the name of Environmentalism, Secularism, Egalitarianism, or "Social Justice." Either way, the people behind all the leftist movements don't have your best interest in mind.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical Do you suggest we start putting people on trial for being communists like we did in the McCarthy era? You ARE fucking retarded. I looked up the groups involved with the march.. which of them would you like to suggest are connected with Stalin? Which ones are looking out for the better interests of Fidel? lmfao! You're a fucking moron!
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
Who said anything like that? I just want the leftists to be honest about what they believe so it can be honestly debated. If you're a communist or a socialist, be upfront with it and lets compare ideas. The only reason to deny it or hide it, I think, is if your on the extreme and dark ends of leftist thought.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical Who do you believe is denying their true ideology? Obama? He's a fucking corporatist! So are all his Republican buddies and a few Democrats to boot! That's why this rally is happening in the first place! Because that sell-out is not delivering the change he delivered in the first place! And I notice how you mentioned NOTHING WHATSOEVER about the extreme and dark ends of Right-Wing thought (the reason why we keep going into all these wars IN THE FIRST PLACE!)
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
I know you’re there to protest that Obama hasn’t fleeced us enough, despite that the left turn he has taken us on has proven to be the wrong direction already. Somehow, you also missed that these groups support the same ideology that naturally leads to Stalin style human rights horrors:
Communist Party- USA
Democratic Socialists of America
International Socialist Organization
Single Payer Action Network
A.N.S.W.E.R.
And of course, La Raza.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical The ones you call "hippies" (a.k.a. left leaning protesters) and the ones who want power in the form of war profits, environmental hazard profits, etc., are OBVIOUSLY against one another. That's why people are PROTESTING how WEAK the Obama administration has been so far! Name one progressive thing Obama has done.. And don't go to his health care plan because NOBODY wanted that piece of crap of a bill. Stimulus maybe? That's it!
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
What's not "Progressive" about ramming a healthcare blll down our throats? All I ever hear from progressives that we all should be forced to live under their opinion on Family, Life, and reace relations. I fyou don't, you're just a hate filled racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe. Judicial activism? Ever heard of that? That's a "progressive" concept.
Also, taking control of GM is pretty damn socialist progressive.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical GM was collapsing under its own weight! They SOLD THEMSELVES to the government. The government didn't just annex GM. "What's not "Progressive" about ramming a healthcare blll down our throats?"—this question demonstrates that you know NOTHING about progressives, and I don't entirely blame you either considering your being brainwashed by Glenn Beck and Fox "News." The Public Option was a progressive bill because it gave Americans choice and opportunity for affordable health care.
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
Sefl described "Progressives" Wilson and Roosevelt were big government asswipes too. It's nothing new. Maybe you don't realize it, but having regulation forced upon you is what you're asking for. It's just liberalism in a fancy new dress, which is socialism anyway. The only people who don't understand the true goals of the liberal "Progressive" agenda are the ones who vote for it. Hell, tey actually think Obama's low polling is due to the things he HASN'T done.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical Yeah? well Abraham Lincoln was pretty cool, and he was a Republican.. oh how the times change.. Ya, regulation would be a HORRIBLE thing in this time where corporations own most of congress and have virtually NO regulations.. "new dress, which is socialism anyway." Stop watching Glenn Beck you retarded fucking zombie fucktard! "Hell, tey actually think Obama's low polling is due to the things he HASN'T done." Name a bill he's passed that was NOT conservative leaning ya dumb fuck!
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
"corporations own most of congress and have virtually NO regulations."
If only reality shared your view. Try opening your own business, try drowning in red tape and regulations for a year.
The Regulations aren't meant to make it harder for Congress' corporate owners. Government will ALWAYS be corruptable with money. That's why you're supposed to keep what they can do LIMITED. You really think Big Gov. is for the little guy, don't you? Jesus Christ!!!
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical "You really think Big Gov. is for the little guy, don't you?" Uhhh.. no. Where was it I said this?? I believe I said the exact opposite thing. Not too quick are ya? Government is mostly for the BIG GUY, which is why you should keep THEM limited, using LAWS AND REGULATIONS that keep them from taking advantage of and manipulating congress! JESUS CHRIST ALMIGHTY! LMAO!
seanotube85 1 year ago
@seanotube85
Good God Seanotube. There will always be big guys, as long as Government has useful amounts of power for sale. The ONLY way for corporations to become the all encompassing evil you are paranoid of, is for the government to gain more control over the market place. There's only one reason to do that, so they can turn around and sell it. Youre handing them their outlet, and you're too stupid to see it.
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@seanotube85 "Nobody supports those people you stupid retard. hahahaha! lmfao!
So, nobody will show up to the mall on Saturday for the big communist sponsored rally?
pimpdalyrical 1 year ago
@pimpdalyrical "communist sponsored rally"--who's a communist sponsoring what rally? Please think before you speak... But of course you won't, so this should be entertaining..
seanotube85 1 year ago
Repubs have been using attack ads with the opponent's dialog taken out of context for YEARS. This is payback.
theforkofjustice 1 year ago
Alan Grayson is a certifiable COMMULOON.
Wake up, Florida- this guy must have syph or something.
coolpillow 1 year ago
Volcom, you dipshit! Are you 8 years old? Grayson = classic lying libertard!
borntobewilder9 1 year ago
volcom you're an idiot! He didn't say pick out the ones you don't like MORON. He said, pick out the ones that apply to YOU. In other words, men you pick out the verses that tell you to love your wife as Christ loved the church, let your wife worry about the verses directed at wives and let her pray on those.
hulenb 1 year ago
Grayson should be sued for changing websters words in the video he put out
farahnet1 1 year ago
Textbook Republican. Pick out the verses you like and use them for your political agenda.
The one's you don't like so much meeeehhh.... lets just pretend like they don't exist.
volcombillx3 1 year ago
@volcombillx3 -- You mean like how Grayson picked only the phrases that Webster uttered, and cut out the rest so as to make it look like he meant the exact opposite of what he was actually saying? Seriously, dude. The fact that you'd make that *one* particular argument in the context of THIS video tells me you must be a fucking idiot all the way around. You've completely 'missed the plot', as they say.
rovibe 1 year ago
@rovibe No I caught the plot and I called it how it is. Yes Grayson's add was a play on his words but the point of the add was totally legitimate. Crazy ass conservative Christians want America to be a theocracy, and Taliban Dan is one of them. Do you even get the "Taliban Dan" line? Cuz i think you missed the plot.
But my point was that conservatives like to pick things out of the bible to run campaigns and legislate with. You know what the bible says about eating shrimp and lobster?
volcombillx3 1 year ago
@volcombillx3 Democrats are the Taliban. They are anti-Christian, anti-Jewish, and pro-Sharia.
StoogeWatcher 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Webster bills TALK AND THEY ARE IN WRITING. The liar is Webster. Grayson just demonstrated in his ad that Webster tells the opposite of what he puts in WRITING. Webster Bills says : "YOU SHOULD SUBMIT TO ME" and Webster tells the opposite of what he WRITES just to look appealing to husbands and women.
MrFreedomdemocracy 1 year ago
this idiot just said that women should read the parts of the bible that says women should submit to him.
1samothrace77 1 year ago
@1samothrace77 sounds like YOU'RE the idiot. I guess maybe they shouldn't read that part of the bible. Maybe they should just throw those verses out. He said that men should worry about the verses directed to them and women should do the same and they should pray about those verses.
hulenb 1 year ago
Florida! Are you really evil and/or ignorant enough to return the Grayson clown to Congress? I can't believe he even has a shot at re-election.
jimmmmie 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
AIPAC fears the real 9/11 investigation.
ryanshaunkelly 1 year ago
He never denied that she shouldn't submit. Just that he wouldn't "pick" those verses for her and just use the ones he is supposed to do. He even gave a slight chuckle after saying that.
AmericanNohbuddy 1 year ago
@AmericanNohbuddy You're right he said it's "in the bible BUT" with an unoppositional tone and "she can pray that if she wants to". Thanks for pointing it out. So it's not as bad of a lie as I originally thought, but it's still a very bad lie by Grayson's team.
TheNavigateur 1 year ago