9/11 In Plane Site [4-8] Director's Cut [Dave VonKleist]

[CoD6HModthedeisel]

They couldn't have been collapsed by demolition devices. If it were, the bottom of the tower would have been blown to take the impact, and create less of a mess like 7. But 7 could have been rigged in 8 hrs. They have experts who can demo a building in an emergency to control the situation on a moments notice. The pentagon in the beginning videos were interesting though.

[PlasmaCutter117]

wow every page the same people arguing! lol pretty funny actually. Not the video - the bickering (great documentary though!)

[drifter402]

actually the belly on a boeing 757 does have a flat part by the wings

[taymengindo3212]

@drifter402 767 * and your right. Plus that the belly of it has those two " Missile looking" objects and its jus the design of the UA models of the 67

[scottieman2]

Don't care what people say that this video has been disproved and all that. I think it's still very interesting.

[TheUtubeNaziMovement]

@scottieman2 show me proof of this being wrong!

[scottieman2]

@TheUtubeNaziMovement go on Wikipedia and they say its all disproved and all that shit.

[TheUtubeNaziMovement]

@scottieman2 lmao who owns wikipidea? IDIOT

[scottieman2]

@TheUtubeNaziMovement Thanks for calling me an idiot. I'm so glad assholes like you are still out there.

[TheUtubeNaziMovement]

@scottieman2 well its a shame retards like you are out there brainwashed wankers get back to cnn

[scottieman2]

@TheUtubeNaziMovement You know, get over yourself and go back to beating up people that are different then you, fag. I'm don't defending myself against people like you.

[TheUtubeNaziMovement]

@scottieman2 u are a fool i ask for proof and you give me wikipidea! then jump off the subject onto another one! are u working for the government in any kind of way? if not u should u seem a perfect candidate

[Gzuzluvzu]

@sportzfann1919 You're obviously ignorant. This man is using physics and evidence to support his claims. What happened to those people? You know what happened to those people. But your mind doesnt want you to believe it. If everything adds up, theres only one answer..They were killed by the Gov. You may say its crazy, but have you seen what humans are capable of? And it would make sense to kill them b/c it wouldnt make sense if they were alive and the "airline" crashed. Deny all you want.

[flamarella]

i don't understand the ignorance of the human race. There is still people who think the USA had nothing to do with this. yea LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE. of corse they are not going to show you this again. i never once saw the fire dept talking about how it sounded like a bomb went of on each floor. and how does a plain just disappear in a crash. in loose change they also talk about how they shipped the steal from the towers overseas and sold it to the lowest bidder without testing

[MopDMTBARTL]

our own fuking military missles attacked us. even if from Israel, who supplied them all their power? WE DID.

[gymsocker]

@sportzfann1919 No your misunderstanding these were not the regular airport planes, the governemtn took army planes and painted them like an airport plane and used that instead, for a more powerful explosion.

[shoelace00]

Whoa I never noticed that thing on the bottom of the plane.

[xxcowsxx]

09:08 the side of the plane has white wrighting on it... mabey a us air force logo?

[tonnieboywonder]

this man failed to mention the one most important flaw in this investigation. Note in the photos underneath the airplane that there are two canoe shaped attachments. In each and every one of the photos of the military aircraft, there is only one canoe shaped attachment. Also, explain to me the translated quote of Osama Bin Laden: "I predict a black day for the United States."

[Gzuzluvzu]

@tonnieboywonder Ugh..There was 2. One is in the side of the bottom of the plane and that big one is not an attachment its comes with the plane..You know those missiles that are attached to like jets and helicopters? Lol you answered your own question. "Translated" They could've made up what he was saying..and if he did in fact say that..so what? Anybody could have said that around the world so he is much as a suspect as i am if i had said the same thing ehh??

[islandguy911]

I would also say that the plane that hit the second tower was a 737 by the look of the wings. but what do I know. really though I have been in const work for over 30 years and worked all over canada and sweden for Skanska there is no way those buildings should of fell as they did, no god dam way.

[islandguy911]

this guy also missed something on the photo of a normal 767 note the back of the wings are straight from engine but on the bottom photo of the plane that hit the tower the back part of the wings are anything but straight from engine to engine, the plane that hit WTC south sure is not a 767 pause it and you will see what I am speaking about. I with all my heart supported the USA into the war with Afghanistan and then Iraq but since starting to open my eyes a few short years ago I don't anymore.

[Rene09091971]

What, if there was Thermite inside this hump. 757 + Thermite = PBAN. The addition of barium nitrate to thermite increases its thermal effect, produces a larger flame, and significantly reduces the ignition temperature. Although the primary purpose of Thermate-TH3 by the armed forces is as an incendiary anti-materiel weapon, it also has uses in welding metal components. Put water on it and you have a Steam explosion. Check pictures or video on google. How simultan is this to the fire in the WTC.

[lonewolf2379]

im just ...ASTONISHED ...at what im looking at

i never once took any serious view of that picture as it hit the tower.....

is there something on the bottom of the plane??????????????/

[rkoguy]

@lonewolf2379 Looks like it.

[cigpapers]

Turkey April 2010 - dozens of top military and intelligence service personnel believed to be CIA assets have been arrested for their parts in " Operation Sledgehammer ".

Operation Sledgehammer was a plot to lauch a series of terrorist attacks across Turkey culminating in a hijacked plane being crashed in to Istanbul and blaming muslim extremists for the attacks.

The military would then step in to take over at the request of the Turkish People.

Anyone recognise the plot?

[cigpapers]

The British media , at the time , reported that WT7 was brought down by a demolition crew due to structural damage.

[rocknrollhoocheecoo]

Anyone trying to rationalize the pentagon strike as being what they said it was,iz a camle with his head stuck in the sand or somewhere else for that matter!

[TRMerc]

@rocknrollhoocheecoo

Yes cause the truther explanation is better. The military mocked up 2 planes to fly into the WTC towers and using 0 decibel sound explosives to control demo it... fly the real planes to an undisclosed location kill the passengers... and decide "What the hell... lets hit the pentagon with a missile after spending so much time and effort into making the attack on the TWC twin towers."

Oh and the fourth plane that crashed... well they just ignore that one

[honeybunch2k6]

Ok, wtc's were not boxes...And if they were meant to be built to withstand 2 boeing 707s why would they have weak supports??? Then wtc 7 which wasn't hit by anything fell in the same way. It was foretold years ago that these buildings would be brought down by "nukes."

[TRMerc]

Ummm have you looked a buildings? Most of them look like boxes

Building 7 was build on a Smaller foundation then the building actually was. The solution to this problem was a special structure build on the 7th floor to move the weight from the outside to the middle

Floor 7 was one of the hottest floors of that building during that day. Take the keystone out of a stone bridge and it will collapse. Building 7 also sustained more damage at the base of the building then any other building that day

[TRMerc]

The planes hitting the buildings were much bigger then the 707, but the buildings didn't collapse from the impact

They collapsed from a key point in the structure failing. If you watch the towers collapse they take 9 seconds to reach the NYC SKY LINE. They had another 2 seconds of falling AFTER they go out of view putting their collapse at SLOWER then free fall

[TRMerc]

How could the explosions have been so quite not even cameras close to the scene captured them. Explosions can be heard 2 miles away

Where are the passengers. If these planes were not the flights what happened to the people?

You say building 7 was demoed, how? Again 0 sound explosives?

How can the buildings be rigged in less time then a stripped down building can?

And how can so many people be involved and able to sleep at night without one coming forward?

[scottieman2]

When he says pull it he should have said "That is when I wanted everyone out of the building." Instead of pulling it.

[rocknrollhoocheecoo]

Can someone clear this up for me.Where did all the people go if the plane that hit the towers wasan't AA flight wahetever it was.Did they exist in the 1st place. Same with the other planes where did the people go? Are they all keeping secret?

[TRMerc]

@rocknrollhoocheecoo

They can't because that is the hole the size of Alaska in the conspiracy theory. No one has dared try and explain

And if they do I bet they'll say some black souled soldiers (probably 40 or so considering that's over 1,000 passengers) rounded all 4 plans worth of passengers into a building and shot them all burning the bodies and they can keep this a secret for 9 years cause of how evil they are. Plus the people who rigged up and flew the planes... they can sleep well to

[honeybunch2k6]

Yes, WTC 7 fell down b/c of weak supports and a few isolated fires at free fall speed while other buildings burn for 20hrs straight and don't fall. Makes loads of sense. Do they really think we'll believe buildings are that American buildings are that structurally unsound?

[TRMerc]

@honeybunch2k6

Take a 2' by 2' box that is heavy and place it on top of a 1.5' by 1.5' box that is relatively empty... see how long the 1.5' by 1.5' box lasts.

[rocknrollhoocheecoo]

No dice honeybunch...the weak support's theory is weak itself." You have to stand for something or you'll fall for anything!"

[TRMerc]

I do stand for something... I stand for believing that a group of fanatical religious terrorists did what they've been doing for 30 years and just stepped it up a notch

They tried to bring the towers down once... why do you find it so hard they tried it again?

[rocknrollhoocheecoo]

Ok there are holes in the WTC and what planes actually(but there does appear to be some soret of long object connected to the underbelly?)crashed into them. Granted. But the Pentagon theory totally makes sense. Ain't no airliner going in that neat with no wings,engines etc strewn about? There is where it gets interesting!

[TRMerc]

Well the Pentagon one doesn't if you do a one thing. One put a scaled 747 across the damaged area of the Pentagon

The damage to the pentagon actually is as wide as the engines of a 747... so they would have been inside the collapsed part of the building

Also the base of the building next to the hole is damaged, There are even some pillars exposed and cracked

Most photos of with fire fighters are with to much smoke and other things blocking to show what is really there

[TRMerc]

That "Flash" before the plane does happen when the nose touches the building. Don't believe me? Take a toothpick or a Qtip and measure from the wings to the nose. Then when the "Flash" happens place it where you measured and tell me where the tip of it is. For me in every clip that was AT the nose, not before like he suggests AT

[scottieman2]

My question is why there is a flash at all?

Was not electricity.

[TRMerc]

@scottieman2

You're one of those missile believers aren't you.

Ok riddle me this oh wise one... where is the flash from the plane and fire streak of a missile coming off of the plane. Why is there only a flash of "impact" of a missile and no other signs of one?

[scottieman2]

My question is if it isn;t a missle why was there even a fire? There was nothing flamible outside the window of the building or on the plane.

[TRMerc]

@scottieman2

Who knows, it might have been a ghosting effect due to the fact the camera wasn't of high quality and the fact the plane is shown outside the building in one frame, and half way in the next

It might be an effect what happened between those points, it could be the nose being crumpled and it was never brought into a full frame so it looks like an explosion

Any expert would tell you, you don't need an explosion for the plane to go through the building

[scottieman2]

I know you don't need an expert to tell me that. But still wonder what that flash was.

[TRMerc]

@scottieman2

Find a film annalist specialist. Digital recordings get some strange effects in them. One of the reasons Hollywood took so long to switch over to them.

Remember Digital Cameras have been out since the start of television

[scottieman2]

I still say there is something fishy about that flash. It's weird.

[TRMerc]

I know, but the evidence against an explosion outweigh the evidence for. Maybe there were 550 volt lines running along the main supports of the building and it was an electrical explosion

Most people don't know but the Twin Towers were build like tubes not like traditional buildings with the support in the middle

[scottieman2]

Oh... okay.

[TRMerc]

One more thing... if it was a missile how small of a warhead was it?

The "explosion" was just larger then the fuselage

That size had to be a shoulder fired model, which if mounted on the outside of the plane could not be easily identified by the ground. And a missile as large as the "shape" people refer to as a missile is big enough it would make an explosion large enough to level a house to the foundation

[blueshadow1996]

Ever fire an armour piercing bullet,notice a spark cuased from metal meeting metal.I am commenting as he is showing this.notice the sunshine,and the reflection of the underside of the airliner.From the different angles you cant see anything underneath