Lol.. i always knew that space was infinite. Geometry is only usefull when you want to built a house. NOT when you want to explain life/matter/existence as a whole.
"You have to think outside of the box." - "What box?"
Someone should have told the moron operating the camera that when Nassim is showing/discussing figures on the screen that the camera should be trained... ON THE SCREEN. Kind of annoying having to try to visualize what he's saying when he's already showing it. Camera man = fail in cut 3/45
I watched thus video on google videos earlier so I'll be going, I do have questions however I think the inky place where I could get a reasonable response to a question is nassim, a master mathematician or, someone else smart enough to give me the answer. To summarize these comments, Why the fuck am I so addicted to the Internet that I either post or read comments on anything science or speculative ever?
As for one of those sentences being wrong, in what I said... The in general was due to forgetting I had already written general because of not giving a fuck... About people's eyes.
r nonsense that people can espouse in certain fields provided that its what people want to hear, people who Atleast have something to say get dismissed by just as qualified people who otherwise permit utter nonsense under the condition that it doesn't suit their own emotions. Actually as for the mainstream, a qualified consensus, that follows the pattern of accumulating evidence should generally be trusted in general by the lay men the exceptions are not for them to judge, that is my remark to
@Spieldamelenium This qualified consensus is (on the whole) interested in maintaining its academic status. New evidence that calls established 'theories' into question is largely disregarded. The Red Shift issues for instance, call into serious question the Big Bang (or expanding universe) validity (the universe is electrical)... as the establishment disregards growing evidence, the religious fundies are jumping all over it to support creationism. I like Nassim's work. His mind is free to think.
LOL there's a lot of haters in here. I think they're scared. You're looking for one little slip in his wording so that you can dissmiss it all. Or you say he's not the first person to come up with this type of theory. It doesn't matter. He's not selling you something. He's just sharing a theory. I choose to believe that there is a lot of valid information here.
Wow, you clearly didn't pay attention. This guy who seems like an average joe just basically proved all of western physics incomplete and therefor inaccurate. And furthermore he proved that the nature of the universe is not cyclical like all your precious textbooks advocate. Of course if you open a textbook and use their equations in a non-existent environment like physics does then you will get verifiable evidence that it is correct. The equations are wrong, not someone executing it
Wow, you clearly didn't pay attention. This guy who seems like an average joe just basically proved all of western physics incomplete and therefor inaccurate. And furthermore he proved that the nature of the universe is not cyclical like all your precious textbooks advocate. Of course if you open a textbook and use their equations in a non-existent environment like physics does then you will get verifiable evidence that it is correct. The equations are wrong, not someone executing it
@anitclothing No he didn't, he just told some pretty stories.
The world is way too full of people who dismiss things they don't understand in favour of things that feel nice. The word for this is PREJUDICE, and it ain't good.
The 'physics' Haramein uses is easy to understand for anyone familiar with science, and it's easy to see that it's wrong and to explain why without resorting to any 'textbooks'. Physics is about exploring, understanding, finding out.
@TheBobathon Prejudice? What exactly is he pre-judging? You mean speculation? Nassim basically is trying to connect the micro w/ the macro. Einstien with Newton. Stop hating on his math and his economic status. If some dumbass that went to Harvard was saying the same thing with a little better presentation you'd be wetting urself and you know it. If we do have a major scientific revolation it will come from some one JUST like Nassim. You would probably like Aristotle. Go read his crap.
Fractals are found all over; clouds are self similiar; lung alveloi are fractal folded on each other, to maximize surface area, as are brain convolutions(folds) to maximize contact with cerebrospinal fluid, the Star of David is the second order fractal to the Koch Snowflake. Finally, he's hinting at something.
I agree with TMZ... and for myself i love listening to Haramein...And Oh then i think about this so called"Lucy" that these so smart scientist came up with and of course that was a Lie..Lucy was a Chimp.. People need to explore and use their Brains. Yes he will make mistakes, but at least he questions what is and was and why, Not like all this Crap they show on the history and discovery channels where they are onesided and unfair.
Is it deeply unfair that we value the views of people who know what they're talking about higher than the views of people who don't?
People need to explore and use their brains, but let's not let our brains be slaves to a self-centred "it's true because I like it". Let's use them for something other than confirming the stories we like or absorbing whatever we hear from people we happen to enjoy listening to.
Haramein doesn't encourage questioning! He encourages us to ignore everyone but him.
@TheBobathon Often when people cry 'fraud', it comes from their ego's fear or ignorance ! Most of your comments here are quite cynical. I prefer healthy scientific skepticism instead of unscientific judgments. (CIA) Cynicism = Ignorance + arrogance
@lomi1 I agree, skepticism is good. Which is why I'd encourage anyone to explore and to question. A cynic is someone who dismisses things without question. You can find how much questioning I've done by searching for "fraud or sage" - I hope you'll agree it's quite a lot. Eventually, when EVERY question you ask comes up showing him to be wrong, mistaken, misleading, misselling, I think any sensible person would say fraud. Some people ARE frauds. When you have enough info to say so, you should.
@TheBobathon Bob , allow me to ask you : who the fuk are you ? You are the only person on this internet trying to make this guy look like a moron . This looks like you have something with this person . You make people say this guy is a fraud without telling them to think . You even made a blog where you started to say stupid things that made no sense . I bet you are a fat stupid guy who doesnt use his brain , but for eating . You ever heard of the Phantom DNA or illusion of reality ? moron
@Borgilian I'm the only person? I make people say things? I don't tell people to think? My friend, I'd *love* it if people would think carefully for themselves, rather than just believing the things that they like, or making things up (as you are about me). Thoughtfulness is precisely what I'm trying to encourage.
If what you read on my blog didn't make sense to you, there are simpler examples at bit(dot)ly/aWGy5z
Tell me what you find convincing about this guy's science, I'm interested.
@TheBobathon You don't see anything interesting ? Don't call me friend , watch out . You encourage stupidness . I see you know nothing of the phantom dna , illusion of reality , quantum physics , rutterford , tesla , the bible and our planets history . Before posting another crack-pot comment think again who i am . His theory binds many things togheter , things without sense . Things that troubled physicians for many years . You don't think that is interesting ? you are a fraud .->The Doctor
@TheBobathon The same thing for you Bob . Bring solid evidence . Till then , shut up . And im not believing anybody . My knowledge allows me to see many things . Here you go , a thought : authspot(dot)com/journals/reality-of-the-unbelievable/
scienceray(dot)com/physics/time-travel-the-impossible-is-becoming-real/ . I don't see anything made by you Bob . Not a single thing showing me you have a bit of value . Should i expect from you the same thing you've done to Nassim ?
@TheBobathon Btw , didn't stories and ideas brought us things like the TV ? you ever read a story in which a magic mirror had the power to talk ? Should i make the connection for you ? DA TV . TADAAA , very hard , huh ? Sry , this thing is so simple that i dont need math formulas . Bad for you
@TheBobathon Um he's explaining a theory... You're just speculating... do you want him to stand up there and explain everyone elses theories and compare theirs to his so that he's not bias? I think you need to use your brain a bit less and get outside yourself. You're being ignorant brother. There is a lot of truth in what hes saying. Can't you feel it?
His "award" was from a private computing symposium, not physics, not peer reviewed, not taken seriously by ANYBODY in the international physics community.
Who are you? Are you the one that defines what a physicist is? You think he needs a college degree? What are the exact criteria one must be to be defined as a physicist? I wouldn't care if he was still living in his VAN. He has many valid points here and I don't understand why people are so deffensive of that. Is it because hes not like you? Explain yourself. Even if the math isn't solid, its the most logical unified field theory i've come across.
RIGHT ON!!! Those that went to a university were fe lies by the offspring of the Nazi/vatican paid for Project Papaer clip.
They know all of this in black ops and purposefully dissiminate lies and missconnections or no-connections in universities, BUT if you are smart you can see right through it like I did.
@ChristyNiNe let me see now, you said that everyone "that went to a university were fe lies by the offspring of the Nazi/vatican paid for Project Papaer clip."
Just seems uncanny how many of the people standing up for Haramein are either spouting obnoxious prejudices or they sound like they're off their face on something. Or both.
Right...he's a cult leader who has won awards for his physics papers. I've never known a cult leader to be so highly regarded scientifically and publicly.
In ongoing research you travel many roads to try to find an answer, and more often than not, you're wrong, but you only have to be right once. So what if he's made errors while traveling. Are you suggesting that you don't?
As for asking for $, So? All non-profits do.
The government TAKES your money, so whose the real cult leader?
Yes, he does ask for money - he sells DVDs of his drivel at $85, he takes payments through Paypal, he asks for "donations" to his "project" (many ways to pay), he even asks for money for phone conversations with himself, a subscription for this "privilege" being $120.00. About as worthwhile as paying a Psychic hotline.
Can you imagine any "great physicist" doing this?
He's a cultist / scammer.
His website also triggers every PHISHING SCAM alert on my computer!
@indie3 You must have hated being put down by people in your past. Your attacks are a symptom of your ignorance. Have some courage man & get some therapy. You'll feel a lot better than your pathetic attempt to smear a visionary scientist !
@lomi1 Please consider the difference between these two things: a personal attack or smear out of ignorance or envy, and pointing out where someone is wrong and telling others that what they're saying is misleading. Can you see a difference? Haramein is wrong. Almost everything he says (when it's not vague and meaningless) can be shown by fairly simple reasoning to be wrong.
Many people recognise that he's a fraud. Would it be 'courageous' for us not to say so? We're quite happy to explain why.
idk how he can have "hallmarks of a cult-leader", has he asked you for money? Has he asked you to participate in any weird rituals? He answers questions that science doesn't care to explain. The status-quo of science we have been taught disregards stuff like how Egyptians moved 1k ton stones when we can't today. I mean hell science is crap, what gets into text books has to go through peer-review by scientists who are not ready to give up their mantle or change what is considered fact.
He makes up problems that aren't there, and then makes up answers to them. He tells stories and encourages people to take them as facts. He goes out his way to convince people that he's important by cultivating an image of himself as being at the cutting edge of scientific research, which is false. He presents himself as leading some revolution in the way we see things. He has the charisma to lie to people and have them not only believe him but keep defending his silly theories. And so on.
@indie3 All the great minds throughout time were NUTS. Some scientist that can't think outside the box and has no imagination can't come up with anything new! Einstein=NUT Tesla= NUT Rodin= NUT Nassim= NUT. You have to be outside the box, and people that don't conform to that box are called NUTS. All great creators seem differnet because they are being their true selves. Probably think I'm nuts too now! MUAHAHAHAHAHA GOOD, I HOPE SO!
"yes, I realize the arbitrary units of Planck's constant have nothing to do with the dimensionless phi ratio, it's merely a coincidence that the digits appear close to 1.618..."
This guy is a crank, and so are the people who believe anything he says.
He has all the hallmarks of a cult-leader.
His audience is not made up of scientists, but UFO-nutters and gullible morons who want to feel that they have access to privileged information, and people who have fried their brains on drugs.
It's all razzle-dazzle, with his swirly patterns and 'trippy' ideas.
He mispronounces 'civilization', and doesn't even seems to know what the term 'polarization' means.
@TinyCoconut This guy is not a crank and he DOES NOT have the hallmarks of a cult-leader lol (But that was funny "TinyCoconut") It's just that he's presentation sicks big time. But if you just check out what he is saying,, he makes a lot of sense.
@Majorjoy6565 I think the point is that if you 'just check out what he is saying' and don't question it, then maybe it does make sense. But if you also compare it with reality then it is clearly garbage (see bit [dot] ly/schproton ). And if you look at his 'awards' and his claims to be doing serious research (or to have any clue about research) then it becomes clear that he's lying. And if you have any knowledge of any of the subjects he speaks on, it becomes clear that he doesn't. That's all.
@Majorjoy6565 There's a big difference between a great mind saying controversial things that are ahead of their time and not being understood or appreciated, and someone making stuff up that is perfectly transparent and obviously false.
I guess his ideas might set people thinking a little, and that's no bad thing, so long as you don't hold onto his ideas for security and dismiss everything that disagrees with them (as some do). Keep exploring and don't be afraid to find out where he's wrong. :)
@TheBobathon Part 2; I lose nothing from listening to NASS. Nothing he is saying will pay me rent lol So it's pure entertainment. If you have someone that speaks on the same subject that's cool to check out,,Pleas let me know. I'm open.
@TheBobathon @TheBobathon Part 1B: I say this things to myself when anyone tells me anything about life, religion, relationships, politics or anything,, I say to myself,, "Look for yourself, Stay open minded & take the best & leave the rest, what does the person telling me this have to gain by telling me this, what do I gain or lose by hearing this person out? :)
@TheBobathon@TheBobathon Part 1A; I hear you & i understand what your saying. You are right what he is saying helps people from different disciplines and backgrounds to think in different directions that there so called higher education sometime limits them to. Cats like NASS (whether it be science, architecture, music, dance ex..) help us all to open our minds to alternative possibilities in what we think we already know.
@Majorjoy6565 If it's entertainment, I'm cool with that :-)
Some people value the distinction between fact and fiction more than this. Sure, we can learn a lot from fiction, it's entertaining, it does us good and can get us really thinking. But if someone is pretending to be something he's not and passing off his fantasies as scientific fact in order to convince people he's really onto something, and to sell his stuff, that's manipulative, and it's pretty low. Guess it doesn't bother everyone.
@TheBobathon I feel you, no 1 likes a fraud. But he does make some great points about a # of things,, like sacred geometry. Most people don't even know what sacred geometry is or means & it's been around for Thousands of years. I've talk to scientist, doctors & so call religious people that have never heard of sacred geometry. This Cat Nass & other (like Tm Wise,jacque fresco,Malcom Gladwell) helps us ( you & I) to talk about this stuff. Like I said take the best and leave the rest.
@TheBobathon Your right,, but how many time have we seen so called science fiction become science fact?? I would hated to be the guy that had to tell everyone the world was not flat lol That cat must have really had it hard!! lol I say hear the Cat out, check it out,, take the best & leave the rest. If he's fell of shit as you say,, it will be seen by all very soon. I don't take the shit that seriously. All things everywhere come from the same thing "ENERGY"!!
@Majorjoy6565 if you want something cool to check out, there are some things on my channel. I still think you can't go wrong with Carl Sagan: watch?v=_3NAW1U-swc (there's about 80 of those!) even after 30 years. More recently, anything by Brian Cox or Neil Tyson if you want cosmic. And Susskind's brilliant lecture series, if you're lucky enough that your imagination can get fired up by equations. And loads of great TED stuff, e.g. Carolyn Porco's stunning talk on Saturn watch?v=xxXa9pxwzoY :e)
He finds a "relationship" between the Planck length in cm and the the dimensionless Phi Ratio. This screams nonsense to any physicist.
The centimetre is an ARBITRARY unit, derived from arbitrary base-ten division of an arbitrary distance - one ten-millionth the distance from Earths equator to the North Pole.
Use ANY other unit and the "relationship" fails. Unless all scientists in the entire Universe base their physics on Earths size and base 10. lmao.
Why is the planck length arbitrary?and the centimeter is a ratio of the earth, which is very entwined with the phi ration. none of these things are arbitrary.You should pay attention to what he is saying, it isn't new he is just trying to put it into a language people such as yourself who need logic and structure can understand. you will just burn yourself out attacking this stuff man, because there are plenty more where Haramein came from, this guy is just a little more mainstreem than most
@Karma01010 absolutely pathetic? man im not the one devoting all my energy to attacking people who are curious. get a grip, i didnt even watch these videos i just couldn't believe that you could have invested so much faith in current scientific convention. do you really think in the next few centuries anything you think about physics now will be all that relavent? people will reinvent this field, im not saying Nassiem is it, im just saying come on man find constructive uses for your smarts.
Even "alienscientist" , one of Harameins greatest supporters on YouTube, has posted "apologising" for Harameins Phi / Planck error. Even HE has admitted that it is PURE NONSENSE to compare an arbitrarily dimensioned quantity with a dimensionless Ratio.
You don't even know what the word "arbitrary" means do you, Beerious, you don't understand why Ratios are dimensionless. You are exactly the sort of clueless idiot that Haramein appeals to.
The same old lame whining from those, like Beerius, who don't understand or appreciate real science. I am at a loss as to what can be done to get some sense to percolate through their thick skulls. Is it just plain ignorance? Or is it some fundamental fault in their reasoning abilities? Or is it some other agenda? How can they not see the ever increasing speed of progress of real science and instead support charlatans like Haramein? (How long has his proton paper been out - going nowhere!)
@karma01010 what sort of degree do you have?or do you get your "appreciation and understanding" of science from wired magazine? why are you so worked up about this fellow who has something interesting to say? why dont you tell us exactly whats wrong with mr harameins theory before you start using words like ignorant to discribe the people who consider it feasable. It just makes you sound a bit ignorant yourself, is all. Try approaching things with an open mind, you might like it!
I've already stated a few of the glaring errors, and deliberate lies, in harameins "work" in other threads.
Science, and every scientist I know, and myself, are totally open minded to new ideas, we LOVE new ideas, science consists OF new ideas, otherwise it would STOP. All we ask is supporting EVIDENCE.
Rauscher seems to me one of those scientists who go a bit loopy in their later years despite having been apparently sane earlier on. Haramein also "hangs out" with Marko Rodin, who is a total fruitcake - even alienscientist, who has met him, admits he is not the "genius" he proclaims himself to be. Rodin has been promoting a silly toroidal coil for many years with no apparent progress. Reminds me of Tom Bearden and his perpetually-almost-there but-never-quite-working MEG generator.
This unification theory, known as the Haramein-Rauscher metric (a new solution to Einstein's Field Equations that incorporates torque and Coriolis effects) and his most recent paper The Schwarzschild Proton, lays down the foundation of what could be a fundamental change in our current understandings of physics and consciousnesscontinued next comment
(a) It's not a solution to Einstein's Field Equations - it's a metric that doesn't work in the EFEs, and a subsequent attempt to 'fix' the EFEs (on the basis that it must be Einstein that's wrong).
(b) Haramein pretends that a proton has a mass of a billion tons, and shows that gravity would stick them together, therefore it's all gravity! Can't argue with that (apart from maybe the billion tons bit)
Have you looked at the certificate, TheMikejk? It's not from the University, it's from fellow participants on a computing conference. For best quantum/relativistic physics paper presented at that conference.
I do think it's a real shame that people are taken in by this stuff.
It was on the university website. If it is a trick, then I have to agree with you that it's a good one. I want to see more information from sources I have contacted before making up my mind though.
Even then, it often takes many years for people to be given due recognition, so I will continue to give this guy some kudos for his efforts, until or unless I am convinced otherwise. The need to survive in the tough and skeptical community that science is must also be taken into consideration.
That's interesting - I've not seen it on the university website. Could you point me to it? Thanks.
I think you're right to check things out for yourself, don't take my word for it. I'll no doubt carry on saying what I think and my reasons for thinking it - please don't take it personally. After all, I can't blame anyone for believing what they hear and then ask them to believe me instead.
Good luck with the investigations - I'm interested to see what you find.
Bobathon: Surely you're not asking me to do a simple search for the university website? I just search the university name and Haramein together.
Moreover, his colleague, Dr Rauscher, seems highly credentialed to me. Whatever you think of his (their) theories, they don't seem to be "fraud", just theories. What are you really trying to achieve with this crusade against this guy?
1. It's easy to "understand" on a gut level, without the need to learn lots of difficult math and science.
2. It uses pretty pictures and geometrical shapes, easy to draw in crayon.
3. It "feels nice"
4. It REBELS against that corrupted, money-driven, nasty old "mainstream" crowd of established scientists who want to hold back human progress. as if. lol.
Neither of you gents have addressed the credibility of the highly esteemed professor Rauscher. That, of course, is plan B of all debunkers: ignore the glaringly obvious.
I haven't looked too closely to be honest. She's not giving this talk, and she's not out there making blatantly false claims about being a physicist. Nothing wrong with her qualifications, though seems to have spent the last couple of decades focusing on parapsychology, telekinesis and anti-gravity machines. Seems like a bit of a nutcase to me, but who knows. I don't feel the need to accuse her of anything. Apart from associating with Nassim.
@karma01010you don't think "mainstream" wants to hold back human progress? I see it the other way around. thats all they seem to do. I'm not saying this guy is right, but the things we learn at school are definately wrong. Attacking this man is what you are conditioned to do. Attack everything that is different so you never have to admit that your narrow view is wrong. to some people what you have written here inspires pitty because you so enthusiastically defend your own prison.
@BEERIOUS. Typical "us and them" bullshit! Look at the ever increasing speed of scientific progress - countless new ideas, new technologies - the Hubble's spectacular views into deep space and deep time - we went from from not even knowing dna existed to decoding the human genome in just a few decades - quantum mechanics giving us semiconductors - the whole electronics revolution, on and on - and progressing faster every year.
How the FUCK is that "WANTING TO HOLD BACK progress" ??!
@karma01010All thesediscoveries fit neatly into an agenda and have little to do with improving our lives. figure it out bud it is "us and them". Our medical system is a sham, history has been entirely rewritten, and the discoveries you cite are sort of silly man. so much more is possible and in much more easy, clean and safe ways than we currently accomplish them. holding us back? more like they got thier boot on our face and are grinding us into the dirt.
Ok, I now realise you are a CONSPIRATARD. ALL the standard indicators are there. So there is little point in my usiing rational arguments.
Science has improved lives immeasurably. And improving lives also includes deepening our understanding of the world we live in. If you regard the stunning images, explorations, and deep insights of modern astronomy as "silly" then you should go live in a cave, rear some goats, go back to the pre-enlightenment times of astrology and superstition.
lmao. nassims fanboys are parading his "award paper" around like it's a boy scout badge. The paper was "awarded" the title most "interesting" paper at a computing symposium. It's worth nothing.
haramein is easy to put down because his "physics" is transparently wrong (to anyone with a basic scientific education). And "whats in the text books" can be verified at any time you like thru repeatable experiments.
Thinking "holistically" is fine, as long as the parts being put together into the holistic view are themseves correct. But every part of nassims thinking is wrong! He is wrong on fractals (see my comments in part 4), he is wrong on quantum mechanics (it is proven more accurately than any theory in history), he is wrong on simple gravitation (he confuses size of a comet with its mass), the list goes on and on! Then he "holistically" puts all these wrong parts into an even wronger whole!
I mean, Nassim thinks holistically, having enough of technical knowledge. This allows him to use a combination of visual and abstract languagem because it is exactly this melange that shows the point in the most complex and undestandable way. No getting bogged down in technical language or religion, just a complex holistic approach. Maybe I understand him so well because I myself prefer this way of looking into/out of the problem/universe/point/whatever.
I totally agree, bebop, rationality is thrown RIGHT OUT THE WINDOW in nassims videos, together with rational physics, rational geology, rational chemistry, rational biology, rational embryology, rational mathematics, rational astronomy, and rational cosmology. All on LONG vacation from nassims irrational little head (if they were ever resident there to start with).
Ancient astronomers once considered epicycles to be a rational explanation in support of the geocentric solar system so being "rational" isn't always the most important quality in scientific discovery.
Ancient astronomers once considered epicycles to be a rational explanation in support of the geocentric solar system so being "rational" isn't always the most important quality in scientific discovery.
extended psychotherapy might help nassim, but i doubt it. all i can suggest is put him in a sack along with david icke and lloyd pye and hit it with sticks.
muralartist; "intuition" told people that the earth was flat, that it is stationary, and that the universe rotated around it ! Naive human intuition was proved wrong by Science. Your and harameins "intuitions" are in the exact same category as the Flat Earth. They "feel right" but are wrong.
REAL SCIENCE is often counter-intuitive and requires hard work to understand - but the effort is worth it - because real science is far more rewarding and valuable than harameins "intuitive" crap.
indie3 i agree with you on this post. most of what this guy says is intuition. even much of what einstien said was intuition, but i have seen many posts of you saying you have a good physics backround, and claiming this guy isnt credible at all. what id like to see is your reason why. you saying its crap means nothing unless you can prove why you think it is and back it up with a logical arguement.
I think that you have a point in saying that intuition has led us stray before, but it doesn't prove that nothing can come of it. I think Nassim is uncovering dust on a picture that current physics is painting, and the belief that everything nassim says is wrong will not allow you to view that picture through clearly! Ultimately I think his science isn't 100% fool proof, but it's showing the possibilties, and realy his ideas aren't that ludicrus! Ty for reading.
Unfortunately all Nassim is doing is misusing scientific terminology and obscuring the truth. His ideas have nothing to do with any theories of physics, it's just stuff he's made up.
This is why the only people who like or defend his ideas are those who haven't studied any physics at all, and so can't see that his ideas ARE ludicrous, and happily pay for his stories.
The only argument left to his supporters is the one that says learning physics 'closes your mind' to the truth of physics...
I can't say that your wrong, because I am just a person that listened to him, without any prior knowledge of physics, and find his theories to be very compelling. However this may be, I found that through listening to him, and thinking about spirituality and Quantum physics, it put it into a perspective that is tangible and real for me. So in my own conclusion I agree with you, and can now see Nassim as more of a spiritual guider than physicist.
Farseer, you sound like a decent and thoughtful person, and I don't want to argue, but he does sell himself very much as a physicist - that's where his reputation comes from, and he claims to speak with authority because of this. This is manipulative and deceitful, and these aren't qualities that many would consider spiritual.
@TheBobathon Yes. Manipulative he certainly is. He knows how to manipulate the scientifically naive "anti mainstream" personality. He slants his presentations specifically to reel these people in (and subequently buy his dvds).
There is plain evidence of his deceit in his editing of the Comet footage to make it look as if a Coronal Mass Ejection made the comet "jump". Also his claim that the comet had "massive gravity". He knows very well it's a lie, but it appeals to his target audience.
I'm trying to come to some sort of conclusion about how I feel about all this, can you tell me in more detail why his theories are necessarily ludicrous?
I wrote an article on him, you can read that if you search for "haramein fraud or sage". Not exactly why his theories are ludicrous, more about why it's evident that he's just reading a few popular books and then making stuff up, and has very little understanding of physics.
@indie3 That's not true. unless we knew everything you couldn't state your hypothesis to be correct. once we know everything, a la God, we can state that. Science has a habit of being totaly wrong over and over. there's a difference between intuition and fear of the unknown. I submit that the "scholars" of the day who said the earth was flat are more in line with the "scientists" of today than the people who intuitively knew things were related like Einstein.
@muzapstar We don't have to know EVERYTHING to be able to dismiss some things. For example, we don't have to know EVERYTHING about the Moon to know it is not made of cheese. And we don't have to know everything about physics to know that Haramein's pseudo crap is wrong.
And if I hear this stupid "they said the earth was flat" mantra once more ......
@indie3 YOU WILL FEEL INTUITION SOMEWHERE ALONG YOUR LIFE ,I WILL JUST LIKE U TO REMEMBER WHAT U HAVE SAID ABOUT IT. IT WILL OPEN YOUR EYES AND U WILL THINK THAT MAYBE,JUST MAYBE U WERE WRONG ABOUT SOME OTHER THINGS
I have intuitively felt this for many years!! I am more excited now than ever in my life that someone with the education and insight has paid it all out for the rest of us! I am infinately grateful!! Those who are Poo-pooing this are filled with fear and stuck in the old paradigm or working for the shadow side who actually know the information and do not want it desceminated to the general public. Too late!
mewsie, it doesnt matter whether this stuff is put in laymans terms or in equations, its still bullshit. Almost everything this guy says is demonstrably wrong, but his audience lack the critical thinking skills and basic scientific education to be able to see through it.
indie, why can't this stuff be put in layman terms so that the average person can understand it? Perhaps what you really disagree with is the joining of philosophy, or free thought and imagination with physics - (which is such a threat to the "educated") and we remember what Einstein said about imagination, that it's more important than knowledge. Bit of a leap of faith isn't it...
this needs to be on all the major networks on primetime until all are deprogrammed and reminded of the truth. what an exciting time we've chosen to have this physical experience!
There's a guy named Felipe Sparx that seems to have stolen Haramein's ideas and seems to try to be passing them off as his own. He briefly mentions Wicock, Haramein, in passing, but seems to be totally ripping off wholesale, the fruits of Haramein's work. If you visit Felipe's vids, please feel free to call this Felipe out as the fraud he appears to be
I do not want to scare any of you but.... I hope you know that we are born with infinite knowledge. Every possible outcome, time, location, and interaction you will ever account for is there from conception. All we are doing through life is narrowing down possibilities and knowledge. Knowledge is energy and energy cannot be created nor destroyed but transformed. Every thing you will know you already knew driven by your choices. Choice is transfer of energy. Choose wisely.
Have you ever considered why Jesus Christ was sent by God the Father to take that place of the Wrath of God for us on The Cross? Because we were on our way (body, soul, and spirit) to the lake of Fire like Satan and his angels.
Nassim is a true Rennasance man, who reveals well how self questioning with BIG questions has lead to deeper understandings. I remember this Cosmos footage as having a very powerful effect when I saw it. Nassim's Unified Field Theory, which he is now leading viewers through, is so elegant that if you follow through the next several videos you will be further inspired and exhilerated by your unique singularity and unity within infinate Creation.
Lol.. i always knew that space was infinite. Geometry is only usefull when you want to built a house. NOT when you want to explain life/matter/existence as a whole.
"You have to think outside of the box." - "What box?"
kroese1870 3 weeks ago
anyone has a higher quality of these videos?
biax123456 1 month ago
Someone should have told the moron operating the camera that when Nassim is showing/discussing figures on the screen that the camera should be trained... ON THE SCREEN. Kind of annoying having to try to visualize what he's saying when he's already showing it. Camera man = fail in cut 3/45
UseUrDamnHead 3 months ago in playlist Nassim Haramein - The Unified Field Theory
all physics arguments aside, why was this recorded with a cucumber?
profhe 4 months ago
@profhe Because Nassim extracts sunbeams from them.
steeltable218 3 months ago
His theory implies that the nucleus of a single atom of hydrogen has a mass of nearly a billion tons!!!
justincgs 4 months ago
I watched thus video on google videos earlier so I'll be going, I do have questions however I think the inky place where I could get a reasonable response to a question is nassim, a master mathematician or, someone else smart enough to give me the answer. To summarize these comments, Why the fuck am I so addicted to the Internet that I either post or read comments on anything science or speculative ever?
Spieldamelenium 5 months ago
@Spieldamelenium Peer review?
ikemkrueger 4 months ago
As for one of those sentences being wrong, in what I said... The in general was due to forgetting I had already written general because of not giving a fuck... About people's eyes.
Spieldamelenium 5 months ago
r nonsense that people can espouse in certain fields provided that its what people want to hear, people who Atleast have something to say get dismissed by just as qualified people who otherwise permit utter nonsense under the condition that it doesn't suit their own emotions. Actually as for the mainstream, a qualified consensus, that follows the pattern of accumulating evidence should generally be trusted in general by the lay men the exceptions are not for them to judge, that is my remark to
Spieldamelenium 5 months ago
@Spieldamelenium This qualified consensus is (on the whole) interested in maintaining its academic status. New evidence that calls established 'theories' into question is largely disregarded. The Red Shift issues for instance, call into serious question the Big Bang (or expanding universe) validity (the universe is electrical)... as the establishment disregards growing evidence, the religious fundies are jumping all over it to support creationism. I like Nassim's work. His mind is free to think.
immayhem 4 months ago
I would put criticism towards him in this case this way, I get the impression it is like the utte
Spieldamelenium 5 months ago
Polarity? dualism...
parousia555 8 months ago
Polarity?
parousia555 8 months ago
this relates to chaos theory i think.... Been doing a bit of reading and what he says here seems to relate..... Thoughts anyone?
10100003 8 months ago
Oh when oh when will someone stand up for his science.
Don't you ever wonder that?
TheBobathon 1 year ago
Wow. Can these people get any stupider.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon I know. It's frightening.
steeltable218 1 year ago
@TheBobathon Ironically, "stupider" is not a word. :P
MistressKarumi 1 year ago
@MistressKarumi :-)
TheBobathon 1 year ago
LOL there's a lot of haters in here. I think they're scared. You're looking for one little slip in his wording so that you can dissmiss it all. Or you say he's not the first person to come up with this type of theory. It doesn't matter. He's not selling you something. He's just sharing a theory. I choose to believe that there is a lot of valid information here.
letmeseethat1 1 year ago
@letmeseethat1 aw, that's nice for you
TheBobathon 1 year ago
wow camera man, seriously?... beautiful job.
woodwhips 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow, you clearly didn't pay attention. This guy who seems like an average joe just basically proved all of western physics incomplete and therefor inaccurate. And furthermore he proved that the nature of the universe is not cyclical like all your precious textbooks advocate. Of course if you open a textbook and use their equations in a non-existent environment like physics does then you will get verifiable evidence that it is correct. The equations are wrong, not someone executing it
anitclothing 1 year ago
Wow, you clearly didn't pay attention. This guy who seems like an average joe just basically proved all of western physics incomplete and therefor inaccurate. And furthermore he proved that the nature of the universe is not cyclical like all your precious textbooks advocate. Of course if you open a textbook and use their equations in a non-existent environment like physics does then you will get verifiable evidence that it is correct. The equations are wrong, not someone executing it
anitclothing 1 year ago
@anitclothing No he didn't, he just told some pretty stories.
The world is way too full of people who dismiss things they don't understand in favour of things that feel nice. The word for this is PREJUDICE, and it ain't good.
The 'physics' Haramein uses is easy to understand for anyone familiar with science, and it's easy to see that it's wrong and to explain why without resorting to any 'textbooks'. Physics is about exploring, understanding, finding out.
Haramein relies entirely on prejudice.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon Prejudice? What exactly is he pre-judging? You mean speculation? Nassim basically is trying to connect the micro w/ the macro. Einstien with Newton. Stop hating on his math and his economic status. If some dumbass that went to Harvard was saying the same thing with a little better presentation you'd be wetting urself and you know it. If we do have a major scientific revolation it will come from some one JUST like Nassim. You would probably like Aristotle. Go read his crap.
letmeseethat1 1 year ago
@letmeseethat1 no, none of that. Any more ideas?
TheBobathon 1 year ago
I like his way of talking and challenging our traditional wievs of reality.
Some people like playing with thoughts, ideas, visions.
Some find relief in routines and konservvative thought patterns.
Thank god we are all individuals and non of us are alike any other person.
Love and light of wisdom to us all. And courage to be vocal individuals.
edewit08 1 year ago
haters haters... tsk tsk. He must be doing something right.
ParapaDrifter 1 year ago
@ParapaDrifter Whoa - If people disagree, it must be right?? That's wild logic. Would you apply it to someone who killed your best friend?
(For my part, I don't 'hate' him. I just see that he's a fake and think it's worth pointing out.)
TheBobathon 1 year ago
EVERYONE ON THE COMMENT PAGE IS SMART...except for the worthless scared bashers. LOVE YA NASSIM, AND I LOVE THE PEOPLE HERE...
support ANDREW BASIAGO in this EQUAL QUEST OF TRUTH AND FREE UNDERSTANDING.... before the fucking fema camps get ya
WilAzzamEdison 1 year ago
kids also think Santa Claus is quite logical
tonowicz1 1 year ago
Fractals are found all over; clouds are self similiar; lung alveloi are fractal folded on each other, to maximize surface area, as are brain convolutions(folds) to maximize contact with cerebrospinal fluid, the Star of David is the second order fractal to the Koch Snowflake. Finally, he's hinting at something.
newbetterandhappy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sign up to enter the Dinair Airbrush Makeup Giveaway.
Each month the 4 Grand Prize winners will receive a Free Airbrush Makeup Kit from Dinair. Enter below for your chance to win—good luck!
dinairairbrushmakeup 1 year ago
I agree with TMZ... and for myself i love listening to Haramein...And Oh then i think about this so called"Lucy" that these so smart scientist came up with and of course that was a Lie..Lucy was a Chimp.. People need to explore and use their Brains. Yes he will make mistakes, but at least he questions what is and was and why, Not like all this Crap they show on the history and discovery channels where they are onesided and unfair.
onefeather33 1 year ago
Is it deeply unfair that we value the views of people who know what they're talking about higher than the views of people who don't?
People need to explore and use their brains, but let's not let our brains be slaves to a self-centred "it's true because I like it". Let's use them for something other than confirming the stories we like or absorbing whatever we hear from people we happen to enjoy listening to.
Haramein doesn't encourage questioning! He encourages us to ignore everyone but him.
TheBobathon 1 year ago 3
@TheBobathon Often when people cry 'fraud', it comes from their ego's fear or ignorance ! Most of your comments here are quite cynical. I prefer healthy scientific skepticism instead of unscientific judgments. (CIA) Cynicism = Ignorance + arrogance
lomi1 1 year ago
@lomi1 I agree, skepticism is good. Which is why I'd encourage anyone to explore and to question. A cynic is someone who dismisses things without question. You can find how much questioning I've done by searching for "fraud or sage" - I hope you'll agree it's quite a lot. Eventually, when EVERY question you ask comes up showing him to be wrong, mistaken, misleading, misselling, I think any sensible person would say fraud. Some people ARE frauds. When you have enough info to say so, you should.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon Bob , allow me to ask you : who the fuk are you ? You are the only person on this internet trying to make this guy look like a moron . This looks like you have something with this person . You make people say this guy is a fraud without telling them to think . You even made a blog where you started to say stupid things that made no sense . I bet you are a fat stupid guy who doesnt use his brain , but for eating . You ever heard of the Phantom DNA or illusion of reality ? moron
Borgilian 1 year ago
@Borgilian I'm the only person? I make people say things? I don't tell people to think? My friend, I'd *love* it if people would think carefully for themselves, rather than just believing the things that they like, or making things up (as you are about me). Thoughtfulness is precisely what I'm trying to encourage.
If what you read on my blog didn't make sense to you, there are simpler examples at bit(dot)ly/aWGy5z
Tell me what you find convincing about this guy's science, I'm interested.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon You don't see anything interesting ? Don't call me friend , watch out . You encourage stupidness . I see you know nothing of the phantom dna , illusion of reality , quantum physics , rutterford , tesla , the bible and our planets history . Before posting another crack-pot comment think again who i am . His theory binds many things togheter , things without sense . Things that troubled physicians for many years . You don't think that is interesting ? you are a fraud .->The Doctor
Borgilian 1 year ago 2
@Borgilian oh yes, I didn't say it wasn't interesting. Lots of pretty ideas and stories. But don't you care whether they're made up or not?
Oh, and you're inventing things about me again. Do you know you're doing it?
I'm starting to think our conversation might not be especially fruitful, my lovely man.
When you have a thought rather than an opinion, do let me know it.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon The same thing for you Bob . Bring solid evidence . Till then , shut up . And im not believing anybody . My knowledge allows me to see many things . Here you go , a thought : authspot(dot)com/journals/reality-of-the-unbelievable/
scienceray(dot)com/physics/time-travel-the-impossible-is-becoming-real/ . I don't see anything made by you Bob . Not a single thing showing me you have a bit of value . Should i expect from you the same thing you've done to Nassim ?
Borgilian 1 year ago
@Borgilian Oops , the reality thing was another link . Here you go , the real one : scienceray(DOT)com/physics/time-travel-reality-or-sci-fi/
Borgilian 1 year ago
@TheBobathon Btw , didn't stories and ideas brought us things like the TV ? you ever read a story in which a magic mirror had the power to talk ? Should i make the connection for you ? DA TV . TADAAA , very hard , huh ? Sry , this thing is so simple that i dont need math formulas . Bad for you
Borgilian 1 year ago
@TheBobathon Um he's explaining a theory... You're just speculating... do you want him to stand up there and explain everyone elses theories and compare theirs to his so that he's not bias? I think you need to use your brain a bit less and get outside yourself. You're being ignorant brother. There is a lot of truth in what hes saying. Can't you feel it?
letmeseethat1 1 year ago
His "award" was from a private computing symposium, not physics, not peer reviewed, not taken seriously by ANYBODY in the international physics community.
Stop pretending it was important.
Stop pretending he is a real physicist.
Karma01010 1 year ago 3
@Karma01010 Like your a real agent Mr Troll
Farscape1Contact 1 year ago
Who are you? Are you the one that defines what a physicist is? You think he needs a college degree? What are the exact criteria one must be to be defined as a physicist? I wouldn't care if he was still living in his VAN. He has many valid points here and I don't understand why people are so deffensive of that. Is it because hes not like you? Explain yourself. Even if the math isn't solid, its the most logical unified field theory i've come across.
letmeseethat1 1 year ago 21
@letmeseethat1
RIGHT ON!!! Those that went to a university were fe lies by the offspring of the Nazi/vatican paid for Project Papaer clip.
They know all of this in black ops and purposefully dissiminate lies and missconnections or no-connections in universities, BUT if you are smart you can see right through it like I did.
ChristyNiNe 1 year ago
@ChristyNiNe hello?
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon yes?
ChristyNiNe 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ChristyNiNe let me see now, you said that everyone "that went to a university were fe lies by the offspring of the Nazi/vatican paid for Project Papaer clip."
Just seems uncanny how many of the people standing up for Haramein are either spouting obnoxious prejudices or they sound like they're off their face on something. Or both.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@ChristyNiNe "...dissiminate lies and missconnections or no-connections " You really don't do 'irony', do you?
steeltable218 1 year ago
@steeltable218
You're right... mnot lies... they are limp dick truths which hold little potency and foster consumptive behaviors... I must have been pissy that day.
ChristyNiNe 1 year ago
@letmeseethat1 people that dont understand often get scared or when it is shoking their perception of live they also get on defensive !
benny6666 11 months ago
@benny6666 You're right. Just look at some of the hateful things his followers say when he is criticised.
steeltable218 10 months ago
@Karma01010 obama got the nobel peace prize, do you trust him?
tissetatten 1 year ago
@Karma01010 I don't care about both. I do care about people who help me understand my world.
ikemkrueger 4 months ago
Right...he's a cult leader who has won awards for his physics papers. I've never known a cult leader to be so highly regarded scientifically and publicly.
In ongoing research you travel many roads to try to find an answer, and more often than not, you're wrong, but you only have to be right once. So what if he's made errors while traveling. Are you suggesting that you don't?
As for asking for $, So? All non-profits do.
The government TAKES your money, so whose the real cult leader?
TZMSocialEvolution 1 year ago
@kilikadork.
Yes, he does ask for money - he sells DVDs of his drivel at $85, he takes payments through Paypal, he asks for "donations" to his "project" (many ways to pay), he even asks for money for phone conversations with himself, a subscription for this "privilege" being $120.00. About as worthwhile as paying a Psychic hotline.
Can you imagine any "great physicist" doing this?
He's a cultist / scammer.
His website also triggers every PHISHING SCAM alert on my computer!
indie3 1 year ago 4
@indie3 You must have hated being put down by people in your past. Your attacks are a symptom of your ignorance. Have some courage man & get some therapy. You'll feel a lot better than your pathetic attempt to smear a visionary scientist !
lomi1 1 year ago
@lomi1 Please consider the difference between these two things: a personal attack or smear out of ignorance or envy, and pointing out where someone is wrong and telling others that what they're saying is misleading. Can you see a difference? Haramein is wrong. Almost everything he says (when it's not vague and meaningless) can be shown by fairly simple reasoning to be wrong.
Many people recognise that he's a fraud. Would it be 'courageous' for us not to say so? We're quite happy to explain why.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@indie3 Absolutely right, hear hear!
steeltable218 1 year ago
@indie3
RewardHonesty 1 year ago
@indie3 just because you dont understand the material doesnt mean you have to knock the guy down
rustytromboneextract 5 months ago
@indie3 "Can you imagine any "great physicist" doing this?" what do you think physicist professors charge?
MrChirobb 4 months ago
idk how he can have "hallmarks of a cult-leader", has he asked you for money? Has he asked you to participate in any weird rituals? He answers questions that science doesn't care to explain. The status-quo of science we have been taught disregards stuff like how Egyptians moved 1k ton stones when we can't today. I mean hell science is crap, what gets into text books has to go through peer-review by scientists who are not ready to give up their mantle or change what is considered fact.
kilikadork 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He makes up problems that aren't there, and then makes up answers to them. He tells stories and encourages people to take them as facts. He goes out his way to convince people that he's important by cultivating an image of himself as being at the cutting edge of scientific research, which is false. He presents himself as leading some revolution in the way we see things. He has the charisma to lie to people and have them not only believe him but keep defending his silly theories. And so on.
TheBobathon 1 year ago 12
@TheBobathon That is the best summary of nassim-nut so far. Nicely written.
indie3 1 year ago 2
Thanks @indie3 :-)
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@indie3 All the great minds throughout time were NUTS. Some scientist that can't think outside the box and has no imagination can't come up with anything new! Einstein=NUT Tesla= NUT Rodin= NUT Nassim= NUT. You have to be outside the box, and people that don't conform to that box are called NUTS. All great creators seem differnet because they are being their true selves. Probably think I'm nuts too now! MUAHAHAHAHAHA GOOD, I HOPE SO!
letmeseethat1 1 year ago
Alienscientist wrote 2 months ago;
"yes, I realize the arbitrary units of Planck's constant have nothing to do with the dimensionless phi ratio, it's merely a coincidence that the digits appear close to 1.618..."
Karma01010 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
This guy is a crank, and so are the people who believe anything he says.
He has all the hallmarks of a cult-leader.
His audience is not made up of scientists, but UFO-nutters and gullible morons who want to feel that they have access to privileged information, and people who have fried their brains on drugs.
It's all razzle-dazzle, with his swirly patterns and 'trippy' ideas.
He mispronounces 'civilization', and doesn't even seems to know what the term 'polarization' means.
He's a moron.
TinyCoconut 1 year ago 17
@TinyCoconut
..and you misspell and instead of writing
"seem" you write "seems"
so we're not flawless any of us, are we?
-he seems to be..
-but he doesn't SEEM to know etc..
all smiles. :)
( I expect to get a low level crackpot attack from you soon, that's normal in these cases.)
syncro16se 1 year ago
@TinyCoconut This guy is not a crank and he DOES NOT have the hallmarks of a cult-leader lol (But that was funny "TinyCoconut") It's just that he's presentation sicks big time. But if you just check out what he is saying,, he makes a lot of sense.
Majorjoy6565 1 year ago
@Majorjoy6565 I think the point is that if you 'just check out what he is saying' and don't question it, then maybe it does make sense. But if you also compare it with reality then it is clearly garbage (see bit [dot] ly/schproton ). And if you look at his 'awards' and his claims to be doing serious research (or to have any clue about research) then it becomes clear that he's lying. And if you have any knowledge of any of the subjects he speaks on, it becomes clear that he doesn't. That's all.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon I'm sure the same things would have been said about a number people that we Now think were great. I'm Not saying this Cat is great,, lol
I'm just saying that he makes a lot of sense on a number of points & that's all :)
Majorjoy6565 1 year ago
@Majorjoy6565 There's a big difference between a great mind saying controversial things that are ahead of their time and not being understood or appreciated, and someone making stuff up that is perfectly transparent and obviously false.
I guess his ideas might set people thinking a little, and that's no bad thing, so long as you don't hold onto his ideas for security and dismiss everything that disagrees with them (as some do). Keep exploring and don't be afraid to find out where he's wrong. :)
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon Part 2; I lose nothing from listening to NASS. Nothing he is saying will pay me rent lol So it's pure entertainment. If you have someone that speaks on the same subject that's cool to check out,,Pleas let me know. I'm open.
Majorjoy6565 1 year ago
@TheBobathon @TheBobathon Part 1B: I say this things to myself when anyone tells me anything about life, religion, relationships, politics or anything,, I say to myself,, "Look for yourself, Stay open minded & take the best & leave the rest, what does the person telling me this have to gain by telling me this, what do I gain or lose by hearing this person out? :)
Majorjoy6565 1 year ago
@TheBobathon @TheBobathon Part 1A; I hear you & i understand what your saying. You are right what he is saying helps people from different disciplines and backgrounds to think in different directions that there so called higher education sometime limits them to. Cats like NASS (whether it be science, architecture, music, dance ex..) help us all to open our minds to alternative possibilities in what we think we already know.
Majorjoy6565 1 year ago
@Majorjoy6565 If it's entertainment, I'm cool with that :-)
Some people value the distinction between fact and fiction more than this. Sure, we can learn a lot from fiction, it's entertaining, it does us good and can get us really thinking. But if someone is pretending to be something he's not and passing off his fantasies as scientific fact in order to convince people he's really onto something, and to sell his stuff, that's manipulative, and it's pretty low. Guess it doesn't bother everyone.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon I feel you, no 1 likes a fraud. But he does make some great points about a # of things,, like sacred geometry. Most people don't even know what sacred geometry is or means & it's been around for Thousands of years. I've talk to scientist, doctors & so call religious people that have never heard of sacred geometry. This Cat Nass & other (like Tm Wise,jacque fresco,Malcom Gladwell) helps us ( you & I) to talk about this stuff. Like I said take the best and leave the rest.
Majorjoy6565 1 year ago
@TheBobathon Your right,, but how many time have we seen so called science fiction become science fact?? I would hated to be the guy that had to tell everyone the world was not flat lol That cat must have really had it hard!! lol I say hear the Cat out, check it out,, take the best & leave the rest. If he's fell of shit as you say,, it will be seen by all very soon. I don't take the shit that seriously. All things everywhere come from the same thing "ENERGY"!!
I always start from there first:)
Majorjoy6565 1 year ago
@Majorjoy6565 if you want something cool to check out, there are some things on my channel. I still think you can't go wrong with Carl Sagan: watch?v=_3NAW1U-swc (there's about 80 of those!) even after 30 years. More recently, anything by Brian Cox or Neil Tyson if you want cosmic. And Susskind's brilliant lecture series, if you're lucky enough that your imagination can get fired up by equations. And loads of great TED stuff, e.g. Carolyn Porco's stunning talk on Saturn watch?v=xxXa9pxwzoY :e)
TheBobathon 1 year ago 2
@TheBobathon Thank you!! I will check it out
Majorjoy6565 1 year ago
Beerius, try a Haramein "fact";
He finds a "relationship" between the Planck length in cm and the the dimensionless Phi Ratio. This screams nonsense to any physicist.
The centimetre is an ARBITRARY unit, derived from arbitrary base-ten division of an arbitrary distance - one ten-millionth the distance from Earths equator to the North Pole.
Use ANY other unit and the "relationship" fails. Unless all scientists in the entire Universe base their physics on Earths size and base 10. lmao.
Karma01010 1 year ago 3
Why is the planck length arbitrary?and the centimeter is a ratio of the earth, which is very entwined with the phi ration. none of these things are arbitrary.You should pay attention to what he is saying, it isn't new he is just trying to put it into a language people such as yourself who need logic and structure can understand. you will just burn yourself out attacking this stuff man, because there are plenty more where Haramein came from, this guy is just a little more mainstreem than most
BEERIOUS 1 year ago
@BEERIOUS
I KNEW you wouldn't get it. Absolutely pathetic.
Karma01010 1 year ago
@Karma01010 absolutely pathetic? man im not the one devoting all my energy to attacking people who are curious. get a grip, i didnt even watch these videos i just couldn't believe that you could have invested so much faith in current scientific convention. do you really think in the next few centuries anything you think about physics now will be all that relavent? people will reinvent this field, im not saying Nassiem is it, im just saying come on man find constructive uses for your smarts.
BEERIOUS 1 year ago
@BEERIOUS
Even "alienscientist" , one of Harameins greatest supporters on YouTube, has posted "apologising" for Harameins Phi / Planck error. Even HE has admitted that it is PURE NONSENSE to compare an arbitrarily dimensioned quantity with a dimensionless Ratio.
You don't even know what the word "arbitrary" means do you, Beerious, you don't understand why Ratios are dimensionless. You are exactly the sort of clueless idiot that Haramein appeals to.
Karma01010 1 year ago 3
The same old lame whining from those, like Beerius, who don't understand or appreciate real science. I am at a loss as to what can be done to get some sense to percolate through their thick skulls. Is it just plain ignorance? Or is it some fundamental fault in their reasoning abilities? Or is it some other agenda? How can they not see the ever increasing speed of progress of real science and instead support charlatans like Haramein? (How long has his proton paper been out - going nowhere!)
Karma01010 1 year ago
@karma01010 what sort of degree do you have?or do you get your "appreciation and understanding" of science from wired magazine? why are you so worked up about this fellow who has something interesting to say? why dont you tell us exactly whats wrong with mr harameins theory before you start using words like ignorant to discribe the people who consider it feasable. It just makes you sound a bit ignorant yourself, is all. Try approaching things with an open mind, you might like it!
BEERIOUS 1 year ago
I've already stated a few of the glaring errors, and deliberate lies, in harameins "work" in other threads.
Science, and every scientist I know, and myself, are totally open minded to new ideas, we LOVE new ideas, science consists OF new ideas, otherwise it would STOP. All we ask is supporting EVIDENCE.
Karma01010 1 year ago 2
Rauscher seems to me one of those scientists who go a bit loopy in their later years despite having been apparently sane earlier on. Haramein also "hangs out" with Marko Rodin, who is a total fruitcake - even alienscientist, who has met him, admits he is not the "genius" he proclaims himself to be. Rodin has been promoting a silly toroidal coil for many years with no apparent progress. Reminds me of Tom Bearden and his perpetually-almost-there but-never-quite-working MEG generator.
Karma01010 1 year ago
This unification theory, known as the Haramein-Rauscher metric (a new solution to Einstein's Field Equations that incorporates torque and Coriolis effects) and his most recent paper The Schwarzschild Proton, lays down the foundation of what could be a fundamental change in our current understandings of physics and consciousnesscontinued next comment
PapeModa 1 year ago
(a) It's not a solution to Einstein's Field Equations - it's a metric that doesn't work in the EFEs, and a subsequent attempt to 'fix' the EFEs (on the basis that it must be Einstein that's wrong).
(b) Haramein pretends that a proton has a mass of a billion tons, and shows that gravity would stick them together, therefore it's all gravity! Can't argue with that (apart from maybe the billion tons bit)
Yes, these are classics of modern physics :-)
Keep 'em coming, we love 'em.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
TheBob.
Yet, the University of Leige seemed suitably impressed, even if you and your coterie were not.
TheMikejk 1 year ago
Sorry, that's "Liege".
TheMikejk 1 year ago
Have you looked at the certificate, TheMikejk? It's not from the University, it's from fellow participants on a computing conference. For best quantum/relativistic physics paper presented at that conference.
I do think it's a real shame that people are taken in by this stuff.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
It was on the university website. If it is a trick, then I have to agree with you that it's a good one. I want to see more information from sources I have contacted before making up my mind though.
TheMikejk 1 year ago
Even then, it often takes many years for people to be given due recognition, so I will continue to give this guy some kudos for his efforts, until or unless I am convinced otherwise. The need to survive in the tough and skeptical community that science is must also be taken into consideration.
TheMikejk 1 year ago
That's interesting - I've not seen it on the university website. Could you point me to it? Thanks.
I think you're right to check things out for yourself, don't take my word for it. I'll no doubt carry on saying what I think and my reasons for thinking it - please don't take it personally. After all, I can't blame anyone for believing what they hear and then ask them to believe me instead.
Good luck with the investigations - I'm interested to see what you find.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
Bobathon: Surely you're not asking me to do a simple search for the university website? I just search the university name and Haramein together.
Moreover, his colleague, Dr Rauscher, seems highly credentialed to me. Whatever you think of his (their) theories, they don't seem to be "fraud", just theories. What are you really trying to achieve with this crusade against this guy?
TheMikejk 1 year ago
I figured that as you'd asked me to point out what you were searching for, it seemed reasonable to ask you to do likewise.
He appears twice on the university website: contents list of '07 symposium, and contents list of '09 symposium. That's all I can find.
I'm not on a crusade, but I do have good reason to believe he's a fraud - I hope you can understand if I think that's worth pointing out.
Also if there are independent-minded people who sometimes agree with me, that's hardly a "coterie".
TheBobathon 1 year ago
People are taken in by it because;
1. It's easy to "understand" on a gut level, without the need to learn lots of difficult math and science.
2. It uses pretty pictures and geometrical shapes, easy to draw in crayon.
3. It "feels nice"
4. It REBELS against that corrupted, money-driven, nasty old "mainstream" crowd of established scientists who want to hold back human progress. as if. lol.
The most important factor is probably 4.
Karma01010 1 year ago
5. He makes fun of established science and scientists, which makes the audience feel part of a special in-group who are "in the know".
Karma01010 1 year ago
@Karma01010 - Spot on.
The triumph of 'niceness' over truth, image over content, feeling over reason.
Lying to and taking advantage of people - if they're happy to consume it, why not give them what they want.
Works for some.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
Neither of you gents have addressed the credibility of the highly esteemed professor Rauscher. That, of course, is plan B of all debunkers: ignore the glaringly obvious.
TheMikejk 1 year ago
I haven't looked too closely to be honest. She's not giving this talk, and she's not out there making blatantly false claims about being a physicist. Nothing wrong with her qualifications, though seems to have spent the last couple of decades focusing on parapsychology, telekinesis and anti-gravity machines. Seems like a bit of a nutcase to me, but who knows. I don't feel the need to accuse her of anything. Apart from associating with Nassim.
You're side-stepping my question, Mr Mikejk.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@karma01010you don't think "mainstream" wants to hold back human progress? I see it the other way around. thats all they seem to do. I'm not saying this guy is right, but the things we learn at school are definately wrong. Attacking this man is what you are conditioned to do. Attack everything that is different so you never have to admit that your narrow view is wrong. to some people what you have written here inspires pitty because you so enthusiastically defend your own prison.
BEERIOUS 1 year ago
@BEERIOUS. Typical "us and them" bullshit! Look at the ever increasing speed of scientific progress - countless new ideas, new technologies - the Hubble's spectacular views into deep space and deep time - we went from from not even knowing dna existed to decoding the human genome in just a few decades - quantum mechanics giving us semiconductors - the whole electronics revolution, on and on - and progressing faster every year.
How the FUCK is that "WANTING TO HOLD BACK progress" ??!
Karma01010 1 year ago
@karma01010All thesediscoveries fit neatly into an agenda and have little to do with improving our lives. figure it out bud it is "us and them". Our medical system is a sham, history has been entirely rewritten, and the discoveries you cite are sort of silly man. so much more is possible and in much more easy, clean and safe ways than we currently accomplish them. holding us back? more like they got thier boot on our face and are grinding us into the dirt.
BEERIOUS 1 year ago
Ok, I now realise you are a CONSPIRATARD. ALL the standard indicators are there. So there is little point in my usiing rational arguments.
Science has improved lives immeasurably. And improving lives also includes deepening our understanding of the world we live in. If you regard the stunning images, explorations, and deep insights of modern astronomy as "silly" then you should go live in a cave, rear some goats, go back to the pre-enlightenment times of astrology and superstition.
Karma01010 1 year ago
We perceive. This is a hard fact. But what we perceive is not a fact of the same kind, because we learn what to perceive. Don Juan
bartalome 2 years ago
I agree with you. Your reality is dependent on the way you think.
MuseFlows 2 years ago
Wrong. The epicycles model was replaced due to further rational inquiry and observation.
indie3 2 years ago
Citations please? Just a link would be nice thanks. PM if you have to.
wexarexthexStorm 2 years ago
Just Google "ptolemy galileo epicycles"
mfnickster 2 years ago
lmao. nassims fanboys are parading his "award paper" around like it's a boy scout badge. The paper was "awarded" the title most "interesting" paper at a computing symposium. It's worth nothing.
indie3 2 years ago 5
How do you compute complex physics or chem eq asshole.
Thank you. Prick.
wexarexthexStorm 2 years ago
That's better than nothing.
roen04 2 years ago
know a quote from his award math paper?
dasgroover 2 years ago
The universe contains the points but the points don't contain the universe. Just like his teacher, he is straight away spouting absurdities.
ZionistHunter2 2 years ago 4
oh, and the "big bang" is something more than a dot containing a universe? ;d
ludbobar 2 years ago
haramein is easy to put down because his "physics" is transparently wrong (to anyone with a basic scientific education). And "whats in the text books" can be verified at any time you like thru repeatable experiments.
Karma01010 2 years ago 6
why is everyone so easy to put anything down just because its different to whats said in a text book, give everything a chance.
Jonnylesliewinter 2 years ago
Thinking "holistically" is fine, as long as the parts being put together into the holistic view are themseves correct. But every part of nassims thinking is wrong! He is wrong on fractals (see my comments in part 4), he is wrong on quantum mechanics (it is proven more accurately than any theory in history), he is wrong on simple gravitation (he confuses size of a comet with its mass), the list goes on and on! Then he "holistically" puts all these wrong parts into an even wronger whole!
indie3 2 years ago 6
I mean, Nassim thinks holistically, having enough of technical knowledge. This allows him to use a combination of visual and abstract languagem because it is exactly this melange that shows the point in the most complex and undestandable way. No getting bogged down in technical language or religion, just a complex holistic approach. Maybe I understand him so well because I myself prefer this way of looking into/out of the problem/universe/point/whatever.
leopodstanicky 2 years ago
I totally agree, bebop, rationality is thrown RIGHT OUT THE WINDOW in nassims videos, together with rational physics, rational geology, rational chemistry, rational biology, rational embryology, rational mathematics, rational astronomy, and rational cosmology. All on LONG vacation from nassims irrational little head (if they were ever resident there to start with).
indie3 2 years ago 4
Ancient astronomers once considered epicycles to be a rational explanation in support of the geocentric solar system so being "rational" isn't always the most important quality in scientific discovery.
ConsciousCosmic 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ancient astronomers once considered epicycles to be a rational explanation in support of the geocentric solar system so being "rational" isn't always the most important quality in scientific discovery.
ConsciousCosmic 2 years ago
extended psychotherapy might help nassim, but i doubt it. all i can suggest is put him in a sack along with david icke and lloyd pye and hit it with sticks.
Karma01010 2 years ago 3
No way, these vids are awesome while you're high. Rational is thrown out the window.
14bebop14 2 years ago
muralartist; "intuition" told people that the earth was flat, that it is stationary, and that the universe rotated around it ! Naive human intuition was proved wrong by Science. Your and harameins "intuitions" are in the exact same category as the Flat Earth. They "feel right" but are wrong.
REAL SCIENCE is often counter-intuitive and requires hard work to understand - but the effort is worth it - because real science is far more rewarding and valuable than harameins "intuitive" crap.
indie3 2 years ago 8
indie3 i agree with you on this post. most of what this guy says is intuition. even much of what einstien said was intuition, but i have seen many posts of you saying you have a good physics backround, and claiming this guy isnt credible at all. what id like to see is your reason why. you saying its crap means nothing unless you can prove why you think it is and back it up with a logical arguement.
ghettodwarf69 2 years ago
I think that you have a point in saying that intuition has led us stray before, but it doesn't prove that nothing can come of it. I think Nassim is uncovering dust on a picture that current physics is painting, and the belief that everything nassim says is wrong will not allow you to view that picture through clearly! Ultimately I think his science isn't 100% fool proof, but it's showing the possibilties, and realy his ideas aren't that ludicrus! Ty for reading.
THEFARSEER2 2 years ago
Unfortunately all Nassim is doing is misusing scientific terminology and obscuring the truth. His ideas have nothing to do with any theories of physics, it's just stuff he's made up.
This is why the only people who like or defend his ideas are those who haven't studied any physics at all, and so can't see that his ideas ARE ludicrous, and happily pay for his stories.
The only argument left to his supporters is the one that says learning physics 'closes your mind' to the truth of physics...
TheBobathon 1 year ago 3
I can't say that your wrong, because I am just a person that listened to him, without any prior knowledge of physics, and find his theories to be very compelling. However this may be, I found that through listening to him, and thinking about spirituality and Quantum physics, it put it into a perspective that is tangible and real for me. So in my own conclusion I agree with you, and can now see Nassim as more of a spiritual guider than physicist.
THEFARSEER2 1 year ago
Farseer, you sound like a decent and thoughtful person, and I don't want to argue, but he does sell himself very much as a physicist - that's where his reputation comes from, and he claims to speak with authority because of this. This is manipulative and deceitful, and these aren't qualities that many would consider spiritual.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@TheBobathon Yes. Manipulative he certainly is. He knows how to manipulate the scientifically naive "anti mainstream" personality. He slants his presentations specifically to reel these people in (and subequently buy his dvds).
There is plain evidence of his deceit in his editing of the Comet footage to make it look as if a Coronal Mass Ejection made the comet "jump". Also his claim that the comet had "massive gravity". He knows very well it's a lie, but it appeals to his target audience.
Karma01010 1 year ago 2
@TheBobathon
I'm trying to come to some sort of conclusion about how I feel about all this, can you tell me in more detail why his theories are necessarily ludicrous?
zzajizz 1 year ago
I wrote an article on him, you can read that if you search for "haramein fraud or sage". Not exactly why his theories are ludicrous, more about why it's evident that he's just reading a few popular books and then making stuff up, and has very little understanding of physics.
TheBobathon 1 year ago
@indie3 That's not true. unless we knew everything you couldn't state your hypothesis to be correct. once we know everything, a la God, we can state that. Science has a habit of being totaly wrong over and over. there's a difference between intuition and fear of the unknown. I submit that the "scholars" of the day who said the earth was flat are more in line with the "scientists" of today than the people who intuitively knew things were related like Einstein.
muzapstar 1 year ago
@muzapstar We don't have to know EVERYTHING to be able to dismiss some things. For example, we don't have to know EVERYTHING about the Moon to know it is not made of cheese. And we don't have to know everything about physics to know that Haramein's pseudo crap is wrong.
And if I hear this stupid "they said the earth was flat" mantra once more ......
Karma01010 1 year ago
@muzapstar I second that!! :-)
mylaylay18 1 year ago
@indie3 YOU WILL FEEL INTUITION SOMEWHERE ALONG YOUR LIFE ,I WILL JUST LIKE U TO REMEMBER WHAT U HAVE SAID ABOUT IT. IT WILL OPEN YOUR EYES AND U WILL THINK THAT MAYBE,JUST MAYBE U WERE WRONG ABOUT SOME OTHER THINGS
dedskin1 1 year ago
I have intuitively felt this for many years!! I am more excited now than ever in my life that someone with the education and insight has paid it all out for the rest of us! I am infinately grateful!! Those who are Poo-pooing this are filled with fear and stuck in the old paradigm or working for the shadow side who actually know the information and do not want it desceminated to the general public. Too late!
Muralartist1 2 years ago
mewsie, it doesnt matter whether this stuff is put in laymans terms or in equations, its still bullshit. Almost everything this guy says is demonstrably wrong, but his audience lack the critical thinking skills and basic scientific education to be able to see through it.
indie3 2 years ago 7
Clueless pseudoscience, aimed at a scientifcally uneducated amateur audience who can't tell one equation from another.
indie3 2 years ago 7
indie, why can't this stuff be put in layman terms so that the average person can understand it? Perhaps what you really disagree with is the joining of philosophy, or free thought and imagination with physics - (which is such a threat to the "educated") and we remember what Einstein said about imagination, that it's more important than knowledge. Bit of a leap of faith isn't it...
Mewsie 2 years ago
I love these ideas. We need a man who can think like this and make the links between ideas.
SubliminalAttraction 2 years ago
this needs to be on all the major networks on primetime until all are deprogrammed and reminded of the truth. what an exciting time we've chosen to have this physical experience!
sunshinespirit7 2 years ago
ye man first the millenium and now this. We really picked the right time.
Taunt86 2 years ago
what you think you picked it by chance whole thing created jsut no by a god
look up Annuaki then have look at Desteni universe
333ree 2 years ago
Taunt86
What you think you picked this experiance by accident
Be thinking again Also people like this guy are incarnate to help us let go of out dated models
We would be needing to let go of our the idea of a god and raise our spiritual awarness.
So its all created just not by a god even the beings that created us are still growing
333ree 2 years ago
ever sence i saw my first atom i always wondered weither we are just another 'particle' in some giants table leg or something.....
survival12345 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There's a guy named Felipe Sparx that seems to have stolen Haramein's ideas and seems to try to be passing them off as his own. He briefly mentions Wicock, Haramein, in passing, but seems to be totally ripping off wholesale, the fruits of Haramein's work. If you visit Felipe's vids, please feel free to call this Felipe out as the fraud he appears to be
rapsucks1776 2 years ago 2
im so happy to be apart of this
Namaste.
MidnightDC696969 2 years ago
I do not want to scare any of you but.... I hope you know that we are born with infinite knowledge. Every possible outcome, time, location, and interaction you will ever account for is there from conception. All we are doing through life is narrowing down possibilities and knowledge. Knowledge is energy and energy cannot be created nor destroyed but transformed. Every thing you will know you already knew driven by your choices. Choice is transfer of energy. Choose wisely.
Anothercoilgun 2 years ago
So far the information is great, but I'm not liking the cameraman that much :\
kristofori 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Have you ever considered why Jesus Christ was sent by God the Father to take that place of the Wrath of God for us on The Cross? Because we were on our way (body, soul, and spirit) to the lake of Fire like Satan and his angels.
JesusIsReal777 2 years ago
Are you lol?
Dweepnes 2 years ago
Nassim Haramein's Unified Field Theory is elegantly brilliant!!
RobertaPeck 2 years ago
Nassim is a true Rennasance man, who reveals well how self questioning with BIG questions has lead to deeper understandings. I remember this Cosmos footage as having a very powerful effect when I saw it. Nassim's Unified Field Theory, which he is now leading viewers through, is so elegant that if you follow through the next several videos you will be further inspired and exhilerated by your unique singularity and unity within infinate Creation.
RobertaPeck 2 years ago
I wish I could see the board!!! So frustrating. But REALLY cool stuff. Thx for posting.
pfvloveme 2 years ago
Someone here murder this cameraman!
BeatsRoyale 2 years ago